ALL INDIA BANK OFFICERS CONFEDERATION

Similar documents
ALL INDIA BANK OFFICERS CONFEDERATION

To: All Affiliates, Office Bearers & Central Committee Members

ALL INDIA BANK OFFICERS CONFEDERATION

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER W.P.(C) No.5282/2012 DATE OF DECISION : 2nd July, 2013

WP NO. 507 of IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Original Side

We are reproducing hereunder one circular & one letter of CBPRO addressed to Chairperson, IBA on above subject for information of members.

K.J.S. Buttar Vs Union of India and Anr (Civil Appeal No of 2006) MARCH 31, 2011 [MARKANDEY KATJU AND GYAN SUDHA MISRA, JJ] SERVICE LAW: ARMED

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. ORIGINAL APPLICATION No. 537 of Friday, this the 16 th day of November, 2018

THE INDIAN JURIST

Jaipur Court Case IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER. 1. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.

D. Malleswara Rao vs Andhra Bank And Anr. on 22 August, 2005

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF (Arising out S.L.P. (C) NO OF 2007) Versus

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.5566 OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO of 2006 Union of India

CIRCULAR NO.39 DATE: TO ALL OUR AFFILIATES/MEMBERS: STRIKE NOTICE

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH REGIONAL BENCH AT CHANDIMANDIR -.- OA 1989 of 2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR C.S.T.A. NO.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NOS OF 2018 (Arising out of SLP(Civil) Nos.

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, CHENNAI. O.A.No.62 of 2014

In this petition short point is involved which is. with respect to the petitioner s right to get the benefit of

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE PRESENT THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE N.KUMAR AND THE HON BLE MRS.JUSTICE RATHNAKALA

Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi. OA No.571/2017

FORM NO 21 (See Rule 102 (1) ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, KOLKATA APPLICATION NO: O.A. 10 OF 2011 THIS 25TH DAY OF APRIL, 2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2012 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N. KUMAR AND

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. Original Application No. 221 of Tuesday, this the 23 rd day of January, 2018

BOARD OF TRUSTEES, VISAKHAPATNAM PORT TRUST & OTHERS V. T.S.N. RAJU & ANOTHER [2006] INSC 566 (6 September 2006)

T. A. NO.01/2015 THIS 25TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2016 HON BLE JUSTICE N. K. AGARWAL, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO OF 2016

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, KOCHI

RBI/ /205 DCM (Plg) No.2170 / / December 31, 2016

Present: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH C.A.V. on: Pronounced on:

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. Original Application No. 06 of 2018

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment Reserved On: 3 rd August, 2010 Judgment Delivered On: 6 th August, W.P.(C) NO.

[2016] 68 taxmann.com 41 (Mumbai - CESTAT) CESTAT, MUMBAI BENCH. Commissioner of Service Tax. Vs. Lionbridge Technologies (P.) Ltd.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No OF Food Corporation of India.Appellant(s) VERSUS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2019 (Arising out of SLP (Civil) No.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No.1381 OF Chennai Port Trust.Appellant(s) VERSUS

To The Governor, Reserve Bank of India, Central Office, Mumbai Respected Sir,

TO ALL MEMBERS/UNITS. With Greetings. (General Secretary)

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, KOCHI

IN THE ITAT BANGALORE BENCH C. Vinay Mishra. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax. IT Appeal No. 895 (Bang.) of s.p. no. 124 (Bang.

RBI/ /551 DNBR (PD).CC.No.028/ / April 10, 2015

TO ALL MEMBERS/UNITS. With Greetings. (General Secretary)

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. Original Application No. 11 of Thursday, this the 15th day of March, 2018

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.91 of 2017

CIRCULAR NO.32 DATE: TO ALL OUR AFFILIATES/MEMBERS:

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + W.P. (C.) No.12711/2009. % Date of Decision : Through Mr. Rajat Gaur, Adv.

RBI/ /122 DNBR (PD) CC.No. 065/ / July 09, All Non-Banking Financial Companies (excluding Primary Dealers)

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE BENCH B BEFORE SHRI JASON P BOAZ, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI N V VASUDEVAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER

Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. vs Mool Singh And Anr. on 7 December, 2001

ASN 1/18 WP-2632.doc. vs. 1. The Director of Income Tax (International Taxation) 11, having his office at Scindia House, Mumbai.

A very simple but ticklish issue arises in this writ. petition. The issue is whether a person retiring from a higher grade

Case No. 129 of Shri V.P. Raja, Chairman Shri Vijay L. Sonavane, Member

Na.Vijayashankar Ujvala, 37, 20 th Main, B.S.K.Stage I, Bangalore Web: : Ph: : M:

Indirect Tax Alert PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT HOLDS NON-TAXABILITY OF LAND TRANSFER IN BUILDING CONTRACTS (WORKS CONTRACT)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No. 7 OF 2019 [Arising out of SLP (C) No of 2014] Versus

Supreme Court quashes 1% notional loading in Customs valuation when actual charges are ascertainable. Executive summary

Before Sh. J. S. Reddy, AM And Sh. George George K., JM

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No.958 OF Prem Nath Bali Appellant(s) VERSUS J U D G M E N T

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : CORAM. THE Hon'ble Mr.JUSTICE M. DURAISWAMY. W.P.No.1226 of 2016

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2017 VINOD VERMA APPELLANT(S) VERSUS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

F.No.6/41/2012-FI( Vol.III) Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Financial Services

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, UCKNOW. Original Application No. 166 of Tuesday, this the 13 th day of March, 2018

BHEL : ROD : MUMBAI NOTICE INVITING TENDER

PF & PENSION FUND DEPTT. CIRCULAR NO. 04/2018

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No.4380 OF 2018 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.

Employees Pension Scheme, 1995 and Employees Provident Fund & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DILIP B.BHOSALE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE B.MANOHAR ITA NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU. DATED THIS THE 14th DAY OF AUGUST, 2015 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CENTRAL EXCISE ACT, 1944 Judgment delivered on: W.P.(C) 5636/2010. versus W.P.

EY Tax Alert. Supreme Court reaffirms constitutional validity of Aadhaar PAN linking requirement. Executive summary

TO ALL MEMBERS/UNITS. With Greetings. (General Secretary)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2017 VERSUS WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.9365 OF 2017 VERSUS WITH

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: G NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G. D. AGRAWAL, PRESIDENT AND MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 324 of Friday, this the 09 th day of February, 2018

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH REGIONAL BENCH AT CHANDIMANDIR -.- OA 2952 of 2012

Madras High Court Madras High Court Indian Overseas Bank vs C.R.Chandrasekaran on 17 June, 2013 DATED CORAM

STATUS OF THE CASES OF PRE 2006 PENSIONERSS IN VARIOUS COURTS : AS ON COMPILED BY M. L. KANAUJIA, IRSSE

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27 TH DAY OF JULY 2015 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND

for private circulation only

$~23. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7131/2015 % Judgment dated 29 th July, versus

4. The Officer in charge, Madras Engineer Group Record Office Madras Engineering Group Sivanchetty Garden (PO) Post Box No.4201, Bangalore

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, CHENNAI. O.A. No.23 of 2014

Reserve Bank of India Department of Non-Banking Supervision Central Office, Centre No 1 World Trade Centre Mumbai

Coöperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A. GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL POLICY & PROCEDURE

Versus P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR This writ application has been filed for the following. reliefs:

The Indian Hume Pipe Co. Ltd.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment Reserved On: 12 th November, 2010 Judgment Delivered On: 19 th November, 2010

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER. W.P (C ) No. 5562/2002. Judgment reserved on: October 05, 2006

the income was received from letting out of the properties, it was in the nature of rental income. He, thus, held that it would be treated as income f

Additional Pension on the basis of Contribution over and above Wage Limit of either Rs.5,000/- or Rs.6,500/- per Month.

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER Judgment delivered on: 2nd February, 2011 WP(C) No.5774 of 1998

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. ORIGINAL APPLICATION No. 633 of Friday, this the 18 th day of January, 2019

ALL INDIA BANK OFFICERS CONFEDERATION

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL AND THE HON BLE MRS.JUSTICE S. SUJATHA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HON BLE MRS.JUSTICE S SUJATHA

FAQ ABOUT CPF-GPF ISSUE

21 May, The Secretary BSE Ltd. Phiroze Jeejeebhoy Towers Dalal Street Mumbai

Transcription:

ALL INDIA BANK OFFICERS CONFEDERATION (Registered under the Trade Unions Act 1926, Registration No: 3427/Delhi) State Bank Buildings, St. Mark s Road, Bangalore 560 001 CIRCULAR NO. 50 04.05.2012 Date: TO ALL AFFILIATES/MEMBERS: BANK EMPLOYEES PENSION REGULATIONS 1995 PAYMENT OF PENSION FOR COMPULSORILY RETIRED EMPLOYEES AND PAYMENT OF COMPASSIONATE ALLOWANCE FOR DISMISSED AND REMOVED EMPLOYEES. In the wake of implementation of Bank Employees Pension Regulations 1995, the officers who were compulsorily retired, officers who were dismissed or removed from the service of the Bank, were denied payment of compassionate allowance. Such of the aggrieved officers had approached the Court of Law to seek justice and the courts had given relief to such officers w.e.f.01.11.1993, though the Pension Regulations were made effective from 01.01.1986. 2. Aggrieved by the orders of the Court in this regard the officers had approached the higher bench seeking the benefits from 01.01.1986 only and not from 01.11.1993 the date on which Compulsory Retirement Pension (Regulation No.38) Compassionate Allowance (Regulation No.31), Invalid Pension (Regulation No.30) and Pension on Voluntary Retirement (Regulation No.29) etc. were implemented.

3. The Apex Court of the Country has ordered in the case of W.A. No.2768 of 2002 of Madras High Court, Sri. C.P. Krishnaswamy Vs Punjab National Bank and in the case of dismissed employees, C.A. No.2729 of 2006, United Bank of India Vs Prasanna Kumar Roy and others, and made it emphatically clear that fixing the date of commencement of payment of Pension from 01.11.1993 is arbitrary and volative of Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India. 4. We have addressed a letter to the Chairman, IBA to implement the orders of the Apex Court and provide relief to the aggrieved officers. We have annexed copy of the letter which is self explicit. 5. Further developments will be posted to you. With greetings (G.D.NADAF) GENERAL SECRETARY

ALL INDIA BANK OFFICERS CONFEDERATION (Registered under the Trade Unions Act 1926, Registration No: 3427/Delhi) State Bank Buildings, St. Mark s Road, Bangalore 560 001 No.1452/103/12 Date: 04.05.2012 To, The Chairman, The Indian Banks Association, World Trade Centre Complex, Centre 1, 6 th Floor, Cuffe Parade, MUMBAI 400 005. Dear Sir, BANK EMPLOYEES PENSION REGULATIONS 1995 PAYMENT OF PENSION FOR COMPULSORILY RETIRED EMPLOYEES AND PAYMENT OF COMPASSIONATE ALLOWANCE FOR DISMISSED AND REMOVED EMPLOYEES.

We wish to bring to your kind notice the fact that originally the Pension Regulations were made effective from 01.01.1986, but the Compulsory Retirement Pension (Regulations No.33), Compassionate Allowance (Regulation 31), Invalid Pension (Regulation 30) and Pension on Voluntary Retirement (Regulation 29) were made applicable only from 01.11.1993. As this created an anomalous situation for the officers who had retired prior to the above Regulations, approached the Court of law and had sought legal remedies and got relief from 01.11.1993. But the officers who retired under Voluntary Retirement Scheme, compulsorily retired officers and also officers who were dismissed / removed from service were not given the pensionary benefits from 01.01.1986. 2. Some of the aggrieved officers of Punjab National Bank and United Ban of India who were compulsorily retired or dismissed /removed from the service had filed writ petitions against the Banks, who had refused to consider pensionary benefit or compassionate allowance as the case may be, from 01.01.1986. Relief was given by the Supreme Court of India to compulsorily retired employees as per W.A. No.2768 of 2002 of Madras High Court in the case of Sri. C.P. Krishnaswamy Vs. Punjab National Bank and Dismissed employees as per C.A. No.2729 of 2006 in the case of United Bank of India Vs Prasanna Kumar Roy and others. The relief given by the Apex Court of the country is w.e.f 01.01.1986. 3. The basic grounds relied upon by the Court in ordering the eligibility date as 01.01.1986, rejecting the differential out off date of 01.11.1993 for Compulsory Retirement Pension was that the cut off date viz 01.11.1993 was held arbitrary, discriminatory and violative, of Article 14 and 16 of the constitution of India. As a consequence, the grounds are applicable for cases involving dismissals who are eligible for compassionate allowances also.

4. We have enclosed a copy of the judgment in the above case for your reference and perusal. We request you to implement the orders of the Supreme Court by instructing all the Banks suitably. 5. Please expedite and render justice to the aggrieved officers. Thanking you Yours faithfully (G.D.NADAF) GENERAL SECRETARY