ECONOMIC IMPACT OF TALBERT HOUSE on greater cincinnati

Similar documents
Economic and Fiscal Impacts of St. Elizabeth Healthcare System (Hospitals and Physician Offices)

July The Economic Impact of The Children s Home of Cincinnati on the Greater Cincinnati Area,

KENTON COUNTY AIRPORT BOARD OVERALL DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE GOAL FISCAL YEARS INTRODUCTION

A Hannah News Service Publication. Population and Employment in Ohio s Metropolitan Areas

Employment Situation: Ohio and U.S. (Seasonally Adjusted) 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 -5,000. In This Issue

Employment Situation: Ohio and U.S. (Seasonally Adjusted) 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000. In This Issue

Businesses in Kentucky

FROM CMS PRESS RELEASE April 2, DESCRIPTIONS OF MSAs INCLUDED IN EACH OF THE INITIAL 10 SITES CHARLOTTE-GASTONIA-CONCORD, NC-SC

Economic Impact Analysis

A Hannah News Service Publication. Population and Employment in Ohio s Metropolitan Areas

The Economic Base of Sandoval County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University.

The Economic Base of Sandoval County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University.

Economic Impact of Tennessee HOUSE Grants

The Economic Base of Eddy County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University.

A Vital Force in Florida s Economy

A Vital Force in Ohio s Economy

The Economic Base of Bernalillo County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University

The Economic Base of Bernalillo County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University

Economic Impact of The Bradley Center. Prepared by: Bret J. Mayborne Economic Research Director Metropolitan Milwaukee Association of Commerce

The Economic Base of Curry County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University.

Economic Impacts of the First 5 Placer Children & Families Commission s Funded Programs

The Economic Base of the Albuquerque, NM, Metropolitan Statistical Area

The Economic Base of San Miguel County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University

The Economic Base of San Juan County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University.

The Economic Base of Curry County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University.

The Economic Base of the Albuquerque, NM, Metropolitan Statistical Area

The Economic Base of Valencia County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University.

Amendment 1 - OKI 2040 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN

The Economic Benefits of the Cherry Creek School District

Contributions and Impact of Coconino County Accommodation School District #99. The Arizona Rural Policy Institute

Measuring the economic pulse of Health Care and Related Industries on the Wichita Regional Economy

Quantifying the Economic Impact of the Florida Museum of Natural History on Alachua County and Florida

A Tutorial for Understanding Your Hospital s Economic and Community Impact Report. Healthcare Association of New York State April 2003

ECONOMIC AND FISCAL IMPACT OF A WAL-MART DISTRIBUTION CENTER IN OPELOUSAS, LOUISIANA AUGUST 2008

Funding Local Public Transportation

The Economic Impact of Population Growth in Great Falls, Montana

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE ROUND ROCK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP

ECONSULT CORPORATION Member of the Econsult/Fairmount Group

COLORADO FILM INCENTIVES

The Economic Base of Doña Ana County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University.

The Economic Base of Doña Ana County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University.

ECONOMIC IMPACT OF LOCAL PARKS FULL REPORT

Impacts of the Commercial Gaming Industry in Indiana. November 2014

The Local Economic Impact of Short Term Rentals in Galveston, Texas

The Economic Impact of Flagstaff Unified

The Economic Base of Quay County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University.

Another Record Setting Year for Indiana Tourism. The 2017 Contribution of Travel & Tourism to the Indiana Economy

Expected Economic Impact of Constructing and Operating a New Onsite Disposal Facility in Oak Ridge

The Economic Base of Rio Arriba County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University

The Economic Base of Rio Arriba County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Fairfield County, Ohio. June 2016

Minnesota Printing Industry Economic & Fiscal Contribution

The Economic Base of Rio Arriba County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University

Economic Impact of the Hotel Roanoke and Conference Center. Prepared by the

Access to Care for the Uninsured and Underserved:

A Report of the Economic Impact of Sanderson Farms in Mineola, Texas

North Dakota Printing Industry Economic & Fiscal Contribution

Hamilton County, Ohio The Metropolitan Sewer District of Greater Cincinnati Rate Structure and Comparisons. October 21, 2015

The Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on the Woodford County Economy

2017 Economic Impact of Companies Funded and/or Assisted by the Northeast Ohio Entrepreneurial Service Provider Program

The Economic Impact of Short-Term Rentals In the State of Texas 2018 Update

MEMPHIS IN MAY INTERNATIONAL FESTIVAL

2016 HERNANDO COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY

The Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on the Owsley County Economy

2016 Economic Impact of Tourism in Morgan County. Methodology, Metrics and Evaluation

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE ROUND ROCK CHAMBER

The Economic Impact of Northern Virginia Transportation Authority Capital Investment

The Economic Capture of the Downtown Phoenix Redevelopment Area. Prepared for:

2016 Upstate Venture CEO Survey Economic Footprint

KENTUCKY STATE FAIR BOARD 2014 ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY KENTUCKY EXPOSITION CENTER KENTUCKY INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION CENTER

AFL-CIO Housing Investment Trust s Construction Jobs Initiative THE ECONOMIC AND FISCAL IMPACTS. of the

The Economic Contribution of Maine s Hospitals

The Local Economic Impact of Short Term Rentals in Monterey County

2016 Economic Impact of Tourism in Tippecanoe County. Methodology, Metrics and Evaluation

Economic Impact of the Commercial Construction Industry on the Economy of the State of Alabama

Impacts of the Commercial Gaming Industry in Iowa. November 2014

Eldred Preserve Project

2014 Economic Impact Of Companies Funded and/or Assisted By The Northeast Ohio Entrepreneurial Signature Program

Margaretville Memorial Hospital. Community

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE SCHUYLKILL RIVER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INVESTMENT

LAFAYETTE, LOUISIANA SMALL FILMS ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS PREPARED BY LAFAYETTE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

ECONOMIC IMPACT OF AMAZON S MAJOR CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS

The Economic Impact of the Milwaukee Brewers

The 2015 Economic Impact Study of the Recreation Vehicle Industry

2016 Economic Impact of Companies Funded and/or Assisted by the Northeast Ohio Entrepreneurial Service Provider Program

Economic Impact Of Ohio Aerospace Institute, FY

Minimum Elements of a Local Comprehensive Plan

Economic Impact. Naval Air Station. Patuxent River. Naval Surface Warfare Center. Indian Head. Analysis of the. of the. and the.

$ FACTS ABOUT KENTUCKY: WAGE STATE FACTS HOUSING MOST EXPENSIVE AREAS WAGE RANKING

2015 Economic Impact of Companies Funded and/or Assisted by the Northeast Ohio Entrepreneurial Signature Program

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF NATIONAL HERITAGE AREAS: A CASE STUDY APPROACH

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE 2013 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN AUSTIN NOVEMBER 2016

Ohio Ethanol Producers Association

Georgia World Congress Center and Georgia Dome Economic Impact Analysis FY 2017

Total State and Local Business Taxes

Georgia World Congress Center and Georgia Dome Economic Impact Analysis FY 2016

Downtown Cincinnati Perceptions Survey Results

State Tax Cuts for Wealthy Households Disproportionately Benefit Urban Counties

The Ward Museum Economic Impact Study. Conducted by:

The Economic Value of Arts, Cultural, and Heritage Organizations to the Central Iowa Economy

Transcription:

ECONOMIC IMPACT OF TALBERT HOUSE on greater cincinnati March 2012

About the Economics Center The Economics Center, founded in 1977, is a leading provider of economic resources for educators, students, businesses, and public agencies. The Research and Consulting Division of the Economics Center provides the knowledge building blocks that help clients make better finance, policy and economic development decisions. Its dynamic approach and critical data analysis empower business and civic leaders to respond to changing economic conditions, strengthen local economies and improve the quality of life for their communities. www.economicsresearch.org

March 2012 Talbert House is one of Southwest Ohio s largest non-profit organizations. We have grown out of a need to respond to community issues and to help our clients heal, recover, be accountable and in turn make our entire community a safer place. Talbert House employs hundreds of dedicated staff who live and work in our service area and ultimately serve those children, adolescents, adults and families in need. It is not just about the number of individuals we impact. The Talbert House team continually makes a difference with its dedication and commitment to quality services. In order to measure our success we track data, engage in continuous quality improvement and submit our programs for external review and audits. We engaged the University of Cincinnati s Economics Center as another way to measure our impact in the region. This report is about the numbers from the 2010 fiscal year. It is a way for us to determine our economic impact as an employer and provider of services. We will use this report to inform funders, stakeholders and the community as well as to benchmark our progress in the future. This report is an important step in measuring and improving our contribution to the community. Neil F. Tilow President / CEO

ECONOMIC IMPACT Talbert House has an $115.2 million total impact on Greater Cincinnati. Talbert House fiscal year 2010 expenditures are analyzed in two ways: 1 2 Payments to local suppliers of goods and services. These payments generate: New local spending from their suppliers and employee payroll, and Spending outside the area which has no local economic impact Employee payroll which generates: Household spending on purchases of goods and services, and Household spending outside the area, which has no local economic impact The economic impacts attributable to Talbert House come directly from its own spending and indirectly from how local businesses and households spend the money they receive from Talbert House. 1 The total impact of the organization is 2.18 times as large as its direct expenditures. www.economicsresearch.org

DIRECT IMPACT Talbert House contributes directly to the local economy through its employment and spending. 814 Jobs Outside of government agencies, Talbert House is the largest employer in the social services industry sector in Southwest Ohio. 97 percent of Talbert House employees work within its four primary program areas: Residential Programs Non-Residential Programs Jail-Based Programs Centerpoint Health $52,954,800 Total Expenditures in 2010. 2 PURCHASES OF GOODS AND SERVICES $20,455,200 PERSONNEL WAGES AND SALARIES OF EMPLOYEES $32,499,600 First Talbert House building in Cincinnati, 1965.

INDIRECT IMPACT Talbert House spends $53.0 million on its operations generating an additional $62.2 million in economic activity within Greater Cincinnati. 3. As Talbert House and its employees spend dollars on local goods and services, the suppliers of these goods and services create an additional impact by hiring new employees and purchasing supplies from local businesses. Fiscal Year 2010 Economic Impact of Talbert House 4 Residential Programs Non-Residential Programs Jail-Based Programs Centerpoint Health Central Services Capital Expenditures Total Talbert House Operations Indirect impact of Talbert expenditures Total Economic Impact $17,743,700 $12,699,000 $3,411,400 $14,039,800 $4,388,300 $672,700 $ 52,954,800 $62,245,700 $ 115,200,500 Talbert House Board of Trustees www.economicsresearch.org

INDUSTRY Seven industry sectors benefit the most from Talbert House. About 70 percent of the indirect economic impact affects seven industry sectors. The following table shows economic activity produced in each of these major sectors. Fiscal Year 2010 Indirect Economic Impact by Industry Real estate and rental and leasing Manufacturing Finance and insurance Health care and social assistance Professional, scientific, and technical services Retail trade Administrative and waste management services Sub-Total other industry sectors Total Indirect Impact $10,381,300 $7,654,500 $6,888,000 $5,282,600 $4,439,400 $4,107,400 $3,924,000 $42,677,200 $19,568,500 $62,245,700 16.7% 12.3% 11.1% 8.5% 7.1% 6.6% 6.3% 68.6% 31.4% 100% Talbert House Client Family

EMPLOYMENT Talbert House accounts for nearly 1,400 jobs, directly or indirectly. In Fiscal Year 2010, Talbert House employed 814 individuals (97 percent of them in its four major program areas), with an annual payroll of $32.5 million. It is twenty-five times the average size of other entities in this industry. Talbert House expenditures generate additional jobs and wages, resulting in an overall impact of $35.8 million in household income, and 584 additional jobs in the Cincinnati region. Fiscal Year 2010 Total Employment Impact Residential Programs Non-Residential Programs Jail-Based Programs Centerpoint Health Central Services Direct Jobs Sub-Total Jobs created from indirect impacts Total Employment Impact 305 217 59 211 22 814 584 1,398 Fiscal Year 2010 Household Income Impact Payroll and Benefits (direct impact) Indirect impact Overall Impact on Household Income $32,499,600 $18,661,000 $51,160,600 Talbert House Fatherhood Project Graduates www.economicsresearch.org

NON-LOCAL MONEY Talbert House introduces $13 million of non-local money into the Cincinnati region. Federal, state and local funding support the majority of Talbert House expenditures. These government revenues in Fiscal Year 2010 amounted to $49.6 million. A portion of the revenue for Talbert House is coming from sources outside the Cincinnati area. Approximately 25 percent of all revenue comes as new money from the State and Federal government funding. This infusion of money into the region helps the local economy grow. Fiscal Year 2010 Non-Local Revenues for Talbert House State Revenue Federal Revenue Total Non-Local Revenue $10,541,900 $2,491,400 $13,033,300 Award from Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction

METHODOLOGY AND APPROACH This study employs data from Talbert House on revenues and expenditures to assess the impacts on the local economy. This information is combined with other data in an input-output model. Input-output modeling is a tool for measuring how spending by one business affects the larger economy. This analysis used the Regional Input-Output Modeling System (RIMS II) multipliers for the Cincinnati Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA). The input-output multipliers are calculated and maintained by the U.S. Commerce Department s Bureau for Economic Analysis and are available for a number of industries and various geographic areas. This study focuses on the Cincinnati MSA. 3 The RIMS II multipliers estimate how expenditures and changes in demand for one industry affect the overall economy in an area (e.g., employment, goods and services, value added, and gross output). In the case of Talbert House, the average multiplier for the industries most relevant to Talbert House was 2.18, meaning that one dollar invested in Talbert House increased economic activity by $2.18. This multiplier is comprised of two components: the direct impact and the indirect impact. Talbert House s direct impact consists of its purchases of goods and services, capital expenditures, and personnel payments from within the Cincinnati Region. When the direct and indirect economic impacts increase, employers must hire additional employees or increase the pay of existing workers (who are working more hours) leading to more spending in the region by these households. 5 These direct and indirect economic activities also generate tax revenues for local jurisdictions. In the case of Talbert House, these are principally income and sales tax revenues for the City of Cincinnati and Hamilton County. To help explain economic growth and development, economists differentiate types of businesses or industries according to who purchases their products. When sales to local customers are important, they don t attract money from outside the area and don t constitute new spending in the area. When businesses sell their goods or services to non-local customers (in the case of Talbert House, by receiving state and federal funding), this attracts new money into the area and increases the size of the local economy. 6 As noted in the report, about 25 percent of the total revenue comes as outside money from the State and Federal governments. This cash flow into the region (i.e., new money) replenishes the local economy and helps the local economy grow. Because this money can be spent and re-spent within the region, the gross economic impact of the outside funds is greater than if Talbert House was funded solely by local entities. The indirect impact occurs when Talbert House suppliers and employees increase their expenditures. For example, when Talbert House hires a cleaning service, that service will purchase more cleaning materials and hire more people. When Talbert House and its suppliers pay wages to employees, those people increase their household expenditures. All of this adds to the economic activity of the area. www.economicsresearch.org

endnotes 1 Purchases of local resources (labor, goods and services) to produce services are direct impacts. Indirect impacts are the purchases made by local businesses that supply the Talbert House in order to produce the goods and services they supply. Induced impacts are the wage payments made by those local businesses that supply goods and services to the organization. 2 These expenditures, and the resulting impact calculations, include Centerpoint Health because it will be merging with Talbert House in FY2013. Currently, Centerpoint Health is a separate not-for-profit entity, serving as a subcontractor to Talbert House, which serves as the funding channel for nearly all of Centerpoint Health s revenues. 3 In assessing the economic impact of Talbert House, the study area referred to as Greater Cincinnati is the 15-county Cincinnati Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) as defined by the Bureau of the Census. It is a 15-county region including Hamilton, Butler, Warren, Clermont, and Brown Counties in southwestern Ohio; Boone, Kenton, Campbell, Gallatin, Grant, Pendleton, and Bracken Counties in northern Kentucky; and Franklin, Dearborn, and Ohio Counties in southeastern Indiana. 4 Purchases of local resources (labor, goods and services) to produce Talbert House services are direct impacts. Indirect impacts are the purchases made by local businesses that supply the Talbert House in order to produce the goods and services they supply. Induced impacts, which are included in the indirect impacts, are the wage payments made by those local businesses that supply goods and services to the organization. 5 Robey, James E. and Jack Kleinhenz. Economic Impact of the Cleveland Museum of Art: A Tourism Perspective. Greater Cleveland Growth Association 2000. http://www. clemusart.com/downloads/impact.pdf. 6 Andrew C. Krikelas, Why Regions Grow: A Review of Research On the Economic-Base Model Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, July/August 1992, pp. 16-29.

90 West Daniels Cincinnati, OH 45221-0023 www.economicsresearch.org