International Trade Lecture 5: Increasing Returns to Scale and Monopolistic Competition Yiqing Xie School of Economics Fudan University Nov. 22, 2013 Yiqing Xie (Fudan University) Int l Trade - IRTS-MC Nov. 22, 2013 1 / 19
Outline Introduction to "New" Trade Theory Monopolistic Competition Krugman (JIE, 1979) CES Preferences Yiqing Xie (Fudan University) Int l Trade - IRTS-MC Nov. 22, 2013 2 / 19
"New" Trade Theory What s wrong with neoclassical trade theory? In a neoclassical world, differences in relative autarky prices due to differences in technology, factor endowments, or preferences are the only rationale for trade. This suggests that: "Different" countries should trade more. "Different" countries should specialize in "different" goods. In the real world, however, we observe that: The bulk of world trade is between "similar" countries. These countries tend to trade "similar" goods. Yiqing Xie (Fudan University) Int l Trade - IRTS-MC Nov. 22, 2013 3 / 19
"New" Trade Theory Merchandise Trade by Region Source: International Trade Statistics 2011, WTO Yiqing Xie (Fudan University) Int l Trade - IRTS-MC Nov. 22, 2013 4 / 19
"New" Trade Theory Intra-Industry Trade [ Grubel Lloyd Index: IT T j = 100 1 EX ] j IM j (EX j + IM j ) Yiqing Xie (Fudan University) Int l Trade - IRTS-MC Nov. 22, 2013 5 / 19
"New" Trade Theory Why Increasing Returns to Scale (IRTS)? "New" Trade Theory proposes IRTS as an alternative rationale for international trade and a potential explanation for the previous facts. Basic Idea: Because of IRTS, similar countries will specialize in different goods to take advantage of large-scale production, thereby leading to trade. Because of IRTS, countries may exchange goods with similar factor content. In addition, IRTS may provide new source of gains from trade if it induces firms to move down their average cost curves. Yiqing Xie (Fudan University) Int l Trade - IRTS-MC Nov. 22, 2013 6 / 19
"New" Trade Theory Potential Channels for Gains from Trade Production efficiency gains: By producing more of one good for the whole world, firms become more productive. Pro-competitive gains from trade: Trade induces more competition and hence more output and lower prices (imperfect competition). Love of variety gains: Gains through increased product diversity for consumers Gains through increased variety of specialized intermediate inputs for producers Yiqing Xie (Fudan University) Int l Trade - IRTS-MC Nov. 22, 2013 7 / 19
Monopolistic Competition Trade economists preferred assumption about market structure Monopolistic competition, formalized by Dixit and Stiglitz (1977), is the most common market structure assumption among "new" trade models. It provides a very mild departure from imperfect competition, but opens up a rich set of new issues. Classical examples: Krugman (1979): IRTS as a new rationale for international trade Helpman and Krugman (1985): Inter- and intra-industry trade united Krugman (1980): Home market effect in the presence of trade costs. Yiqing Xie (Fudan University) Int l Trade - IRTS-MC Nov. 22, 2013 8 / 19
Monopolistic Competition Basic idea Monopoly Pricing: Each firm faces a downward-sloping demand curve. No Strategic Interaction: Each demand curve depends on the prices charged by other firms. But since the number of firms is large, each firm ignores its impact on the demand faced by other firms. Free Entry: Firms enter the industry until profits are driven to zero for all firms. Yiqing Xie (Fudan University) Int l Trade - IRTS-MC Nov. 22, 2013 9 / 19
Monopolistic Competition Graphical analysis Yiqing Xie (Fudan University) Int l Trade - IRTS-MC Nov. 22, 2013 10 / 19
Krugman(1979) Endowments, Preferences, and Technology Endowments: All agents are endowed with 1 unit of labor. Preferences: All agents have the same utility function given by where: U = n 0 u [c i ] di u(0) = 0, u > 0, and u < 0 (love of variety). σ(c) u cu > 0 is such that σ < 0 (by assumption). n is the number/mass of varieties i consumed. IRTS Technology: Labor used in the production of each variety i: l i = f + q i /ϕ where ϕ common productivity parameter (firms/plants are homogeneous). Yiqing Xie (Fudan University) Int l Trade - IRTS-MC Nov. 22, 2013 11 / 19
Krugman(1979) Equilibrium Conditions Consumer maximization: p i = λ 1 u (c i ) Profit maximization: p i = [ σ(ci ) ] ( ) w σ(c i ) 1 ϕ Free entry: ( p i w ) q i = wf ϕ Goods and labor market clearing: q i = Lc i L = nf + n q i 0 ϕ di Yiqing Xie (Fudan University) Int l Trade - IRTS-MC Nov. 22, 2013 12 / 19
Krugman(1979) Equilibrium Conditions Rearranged Symmetry p i = p, q i = q, and c i = c for all i [0, n]. c and p/w are simultaneously characterized by (see graph): (PP): (ZZ): p w = [ σ(c) σ(c) 1 ] 1 ϕ p w = f q + 1 ϕ = f Lc + 1 ϕ Given c, the number of varieties n can then be computed using market clearing conditions: n = 1 f/l + c/ϕ Yiqing Xie (Fudan University) Int l Trade - IRTS-MC Nov. 22, 2013 13 / 19
Krugman(1979) Graphical Analysis PP is upward sloping because elasticity σ is falling with c. Yiqing Xie (Fudan University) Int l Trade - IRTS-MC Nov. 22, 2013 14 / 19
Krugman(1979) Gains from Trade Revisited Suppose that two identical countries open up to trade. This is equivalent to a doubling of country size (which would have no effect in a neoclassical trade model). Because of IRS, opening up to trade now leads to: Increased product variety: c 1 < c 0 1 f/2l+c 1 /ϕ > 1 f/l+c 0 /ϕ Pro-competitive/efficiency effects: (p/w) 1 < (p/w) 0 q 1 > q 2 Yiqing Xie (Fudan University) Int l Trade - IRTS-MC Nov. 22, 2013 15 / 19
CES Preferences Trade Economists Preferred Demand System Constant Elasticity of Substitution (CES) preferences correspond to the case that: [ n ] σ U = (c i ) σ 1 σ 1 σ di 0 where σ > 1 is the (constant) elasticity of substitution between any pair of varieties. What is there to like about CES preferences? Homotheticity Tractibility Is it empirically reasonable? Rejected in field of IO long ago (independence of irrelevant alternatives property, constant markups, and other features we deemed just too unattractive). Yiqing Xie (Fudan University) Int l Trade - IRTS-MC Nov. 22, 2013 16 / 19
CES Preferences Special Properties of the Equilibrium Because of monopoly pricing, CES constant markups: [ ] ( ) p σ 1 w = σ 1 ϕ Because of zero profit, constant markups constant output per firm: p w = f q + 1 ϕ Because of market clearing, constant output per firm ) constant number of varieties per country: n = L f + q/ϕ Yiqing Xie (Fudan University) Int l Trade - IRTS-MC Nov. 22, 2013 17 / 19
CES Preferences Gains from Trade Gains from trade come only from access to Foreign varieties. IRTS provide an intuitive reason for why Foreign varieties are different. But consequences of trade would now be the same if we had maintained CRTS with different countries producing different goods (the so-called "Armington assumption"). Yiqing Xie (Fudan University) Int l Trade - IRTS-MC Nov. 22, 2013 18 / 19
Summary Comparative advantage is determined by IRTS and Imperfect Competition. Monopolistic Competition Model Potential Gains from Trade: Production efficiency gains Pro-competitive gains from trade Love of variety gains CES Preferences: Gains from trade come only from access to Foreign varieties. Yiqing Xie (Fudan University) Int l Trade - IRTS-MC Nov. 22, 2013 19 / 19