Re: Lanterns Fiscal Impact Analysis. Background. Analysis Process. June 7, Mr. Scott Carlson Carlson Land PO Box 247 East Lake CO 80614

Similar documents
CHAPTER 11: Economic Development and Sustainability

SKECHERS HERMOSA BEACH DESIGN CENTER & EXECUTIVE OFFICES

Statistical Section (Unaudited)

River Edge Fiscal Impact Analysis

Statistical Section (Unaudited)

Town of Ramapo, New York

DESCRIPTIONS OF BUDGET TERMS

Primary Government Net Assets

THE CITY OF FREDERICK

THE CITY OF FREDERICK

Draft-Fiscal Impact Analysis of Union Square and Boynton Yards

JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI Combining Balance Sheet Nonmajor Governmental Funds December 31, 2017

Original Budget Amount. Variance Favorable (Unfavorable) 1000 General

Quigley Canyon Ranch Cost/Benefit Study Update

How are property values calculated? What to expect: 2009 property valuations

EXHIBIT 1. Salt Lake City

OVERVIEW OF BUDGETED RESOURCES

Fiscal Year Mid-Year Budget Status Report

Taxes: This 2019 Budget holds property and income taxes for city services at their current rates.

QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT

INTRODUCTORY SECTION

COLE COUNTY MISSOURI

SPRINGVILLE CITY CORPORATION. Financial Statements and Independent Auditors Report. Year Ended June 30, 2017

COLUMBIA COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FINAL BUDGET FISCAL YEAR PREPARED BY BEN SCOTT COUNTY MANAGER

Indian River County 2030 Comprehensive Plan

PROPERTY TAXES Property Taxes $209, Proposed 2017 Property Taxes $221, Change from %

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE 2013 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN AUSTIN NOVEMBER 2016

ecreation Comprehensive Annual For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2007

Revenue Manual December 2017

A GUIDE TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2018 MUNICIPAL BUDGET

This Publica on is produced by the Department of Informa on and Public Affairs and the Fulton County Finance Department. Your Your Service

New Mexico Department of Finance and Administration Local Government Division Property Valuation Estimate

OTHER GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS - SPECIAL REVENUE

Name. Basic Form Instructions

OPERATING BUDGET - REVENUE CONTENTS

The Fiscal Impact of the Proposed City of Sharon Springs on Forsyth County, Georgia

Section 19 Revenues. Overview

9.C.2.a. Attachment: FY 2016 Budget [Revision 1] (1727 : FY2016 Budget) Packet Pg. 75

CITY OF LANCASTER FISCAL BUDGET REVENUE SOURCES

Arizona Low Income Housing Tax Credit and Housing Trust Fund Economic and Fiscal Impact Report

CITY OF WAYNE, MICHIGAN

Roosevelt City Corporation Duchesne County, Utah

VILLAGE OF LEXINGTON, MICHIGAN

Falcon Highlands Metropolitan District Financial Statement Variances March 31, 2018

BUDGET FOOTNOTES GENERAL FUND REVENUES

This page left blank intentionally

OVERVIEW OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVENUE SOURCES. Joint House and Senate Finance, February 2, 2011 Rodney Bizzell, Fiscal Research Division

CITY OF EDMONTON ANNEXATION APPLICATION APPENDIX 7.0 FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS

Borough of East Stroudsburg East Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania Monroe County. Financial Statements Year Ended December 31, 2015

Falcon Highlands Metropolitan District Financial Statement Variances April 30, 2018

JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI Combining Balance Sheet Nonmajor Governmental Funds December 31, 2014

Revenue Manual

Economic Impact of the Proposed General Plan Update

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK, GEORGIA

JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI Combining Balance Sheet Nonmajor Governmental Funds December 31, 2016

VILLAGE OF THE CITY OF GALLIPOLIS GALLIA COUNTY DECEMBER 31, 2017 AND 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS. Independent Auditor s Report... 1

MOTOR VEHICLE HIGHWAY DISTRIBUTION FORMULA

FARR WEST CITY Tentative Revised Budget

FY18 BUDGET. Kevin J. Mizikar Town Administrator

POPULAR ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT

Town of Wellington, Colorado. Financial Statements and Supplementary Information For the Year Ended December 31, 2017

TOWN OF SHELBURNE, VERMONT AUDIT REPORT JUNE 30, 2017

CITY OF MAUSTON GENERAL FUND SUMMARY SCHEDULE OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES

Statistical Section. Statistical Section

Falcon Highlands Metropolitan District Financial Statement Variances June 30, 2018

CITY OF TWIN FALLS, IDAHO

CITY OF CHARLESTON, ILLINOIS. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS For the Year Ended April 30, 2015

Township of Grosse Ile

CITY OF LANCASTER FISCAL BUDGET REVENUE SOURCES

GENERAL FUND Revenues

FY PROPOSED ANNUAL BUDGET

Town of South Palm Beach Adopted Budget Fiscal Year

Lower Swatara Township General Fund Budget Budget ******************* 2010 Budget

GENERAL FUND Revenues

Falcon Highlands Metropolitan District Financial Statement Variances November 30, 2017

Concord s Historic Beebe House

Cash Basis Reporting Form Excerpts

CITY OF SALIDA, COLORADO FINANCIAL REPORT YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015 WITH REPORT OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

IROQUOIS COUNTY, ILLINOIS. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION November 30, 2013

Financial Worksheet - Budget 2017 Village of Aquilla Budget Year 2016

OTHER GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS - SPECIAL REVENUE

Salt lake City. FISCAL YEAR Budget Summary

2019 THREE YEAR OPERATING PLAN APPROVED BY COUNCIL DECEMBER 10, 2018

TAUSSIG DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE JUSTIFICATION STUDY CITY OF ESCALON. Public Finance Public Private Partnerships Urban Economics Clean Energy Bonds

Big Chino Water Ranch Project Impact Analysis Prescott & Prescott Valley, Arizona

CHART OF ACCOUNTS AND DEFINITIONS

The City of Arden Hills Truth-In-Taxation Hearing:

TOWNSHIP OF FRANCONIA FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016

JEFFERSON COUNTY, MISSOURI

REVENUE ASSUMPTIONS. Actual Actual Adopted Revised Adopted TOTAL SOURCES BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $

City of Coeur d Alene, Idaho. Audited Financial Statements

Township of Spring. Financial Statements and Supplementary Information. December 31, 2016

City Services Appendix

Best Practices for Treasurers 2018 Summer Specialized Training RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE TREASURER

Greenwood. Village UNDERSTANDING TAXES IN INSIDE: Licensing and Permits Occupational Privilege Tax Sales Tax

The Canyons Metropolitan District Nos Consolidated Annual Report

STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR

TOWN OF POUGHKEEPSIE, NEW YORK FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015

MONTANA TOWN OF FROID FINAL BUDGET DOCUMENT

Procter Properties P.O. Box 3484 Greensboro, NC

Transcription:

June 7, 2013 Mr. Scott Carlson Carlson Land PO Box 247 East Lake CO 80614 Re: Lanterns Fiscal Impact Analysis Dear Mr. Carlson: As per your request, this analysis quantifies the likely fiscal effects of developing approximately 1,200 single family homes at the Lanterns subdivision within the city of Castle Rock, Colorado. A full description of the subject property is provided elsewhere in the development application. Background The city of Castle Rock is located in central Douglas County, approximately 30 miles south of the Denver Central Business District and 40 miles north of Colorado Springs. The city has approximately 18,300 households and nearly 50,000 residents along with a complementary mix of commercial, industrial, and public land uses. Castle Rock is the Douglas County seat and the largest incorporated community in the county. The city provides a full array of municipal services on a general fund budget of about $32 million per year. The city also operates a number of enterprise funds in which annual revenues from dedicated taxes, fees and charges are sufficient to recover annual operating costs. Enterprise funds include water and sewer services, golf operations, a community center and development services. The proposed Lanterns development site is approximately two miles south of the city s center, just north of the Bell Mountain Ranch property. The site adjoins I 25 on its western boundary and the existing Crystal Valley Ranch subdivision to the north. The property owners anticipate the eventual construction of 1,200 single family units. The pace of development is uncertain, but the developer foresees a gradual build up to roughly 100 new homes per year. Project build out will likely take 12 15 years. Analysis Process This analysis quantifies how development of the Lanterns will affect Castle Rock general fund revenues and associated service delivery costs. This analysis is based on a Castle Rock specific fiscal impact model developed by BBC Research & Consulting, which translates development expectations into new city revenues and reciprocal service delivery costs.

Page 2 In order to model city service delivery and revenue systems, BBC collected municipal budget information and demographic data from the city and the State of Colorado Department of Revenue, as well as property tax rate information from the Douglas County Assessor s Office. These data were supplemented by personal interviews with city and county staff. The property owner and developer provided project specific detail, including likely home values and expectations of development pace. Summary of Results The Lanterns project is expected to produce a modest negative impact on the city s general fund, estimated at about $100 per unit/year. By way of example, in year five with an estimated 450 units on the ground, the development will produce costs in excess of revenues in the amount of about $55,991. By way of comparison, the city s current general fund budget is $32 million. A summary of project effects is provided below: Figure 1. General Fund Net Fiscal Impact Source: BBC Research & Consulting. Net General Fund Lanterns Project Year 1 Year 5 Build Out Revenues $58,061 $536,103 $1,458,528 Expenditures 65,788 592,095 1,578,919 Net Impact ($7,727) ($55,991) ($120,391) Built Units 50 450 1,200 Per Unit General Fund Impact ($155) ($124) ($100) Per unit losses in the early years are the result of a modest time lag in property tax and sales tax collections between the time of unit construction, eventual occupancy and tax receipts. A few points are worth noting in considering these conclusions: The city of Castle Rock is a regional service and retail center. The community s retail base generates considerable business from persons living outside of the city. No internal residential development can replicate this level of non resident sales. While the Lanterns project on paper presents a small net loss to the city, so too does every current household in the city. The Castle Rock community is essentially subsidized by non resident sales tax collections and can thus afford relatively high levels of public services in comparison with other similarly sized communities that lack the stimulation of regional retail sales. It is quite possible that Castle Rock will continue to enjoy the importation of sales tax revenue from outside the community, or even grow that external capture rate, which would negate the modest losses associated with in town residential development. Residential growth within the city, such as the Lanterns, will reinforce the community s regional shopping position and help stimulate an increasingly diverse and robust retail environment. The Lanterns developer will provide all on site infrastructure necessary for the development of the project. In addition, construction of the 1,200 units will produce over $8.0 million in impact fees designated for expansion of capital infrastructure elsewhere in the city.

Page 3 Beyond the general fund, the proposed Lanterns project will also produce over $1.0 million per year in various fees, charges and taxes that accrue to the city s transportation, development services and community center funds. These funds are designed to be operated on a cost recovery basis. Each unit in the Lanterns will generate about $8,000 in use tax in the year of its construction. If a small share of these funds were allocated to the general fund, the Lanterns would cover its associated operating costs for most of its entire development period. This analysis reinforces the perception that residential units in Castle Rock are modestly subsidized by commercial land uses, particularly retail operations that draw sales tax revenue from regional markets. Castle Rock Financial Structures Castle Rock pays for most key public services out of the general fund. The city also accounts for certain specific services and targeted revenues by way of special purpose and enterprise funds. The focus of this study is on the city s general fund, although project specific revenues accruing to other funds are also documented. In completing fiscal impact projections for the Lanterns project, BBC used the city s most recent full year s financial data (2012), which presents the most current profile of city service delivery expenses and revenue generation characteristics. Castle Rock has certain notable broad financial management practices that influence how new development affects costs and revenues. Particularly relevant practices are noted below: Sales tax dedication. The city s 4.0 percent sales tax accrues to the general fund. By policy, not by statute, the city allocates sales tax revenues to the transportation fund (25%), community center (5%), and the general fund (70%). BBC has assumed continuation of this policy. Use tax. The city s use tax on imported residential building materials is also designated for certain special funds. This project produces considerable use tax revenue, over $8,000 per unit in the year of construction, which is distributed to the transportation and transportation capital fund, the community center fund and long term planning. Internal charges. The city provides a variety of administrative and support services to the enterprise funds. The general fund charges enterprise and other operating funds for these services and thus the general fund budget shows a substantial cash transfer from other funds. We ve anticipated continuation of this practice. Enterprise funds. Castle Rock to its credit has multiple enterprise funds, where annual operational costs and replacement capital investment expenses are recovered from a specific set of taxes, fees and charges and the funds are balanced each year. In most Colorado communities, water and sewer operations are operated as enterprise funds. In Castle Rock, the city also operates enterprise funds for the golf course, the community center (recreation center), and building services functions. Transportation fund. The city maintains a transportation fund for snow removal, maintenance, repair, and expansion of street systems. This is not a true enterprise fund

Page 4 because it relies on annual transfers of general fund revenues, but it effectively operates with the same internal spending discipline whereby costs and revenues are balanced each year. In addition to a share of sales and use taxes, the transportation fund receives motor vehicle taxes, highway user trust funds from the state, and road and bridge funds from the county. The city supports a multi year street maintenance and repair program through this fund. Fire and rescue revenue. The fire and rescue department serves the city and a larger fire district surrounding the city. The non municipal district pays the city for contracted services ($427,000/yr). We have removed this expense and the equivalent revenue from the city s fire related budget in order to present a more accurate portrayal of in town fire services. Impact fee fund. Castle Rock charges impact fees on new development. As required by law, these fees are collected and reserved exclusively for expansion of specified capital facilities in proportion to the demand placed on these facilities by new growth. The Lanterns contribution to this fund is calculated later in this report. City General Fund Revenues Residential development in Lanterns will generate sales and property taxes in relationship to household income, local retail spending and household property values. Other revenues are largely forecasted on a per household basis. Figure 2 on the following page shows the 2012 value of all city revenues, current estimated perhousehold revenue attributions and the revenue impact of the Lanterns project in the early years of development and at full build out.

Page 5 Figure 2. The Lanterns General Fund Revenue Effects REVENUES 2012 Council Approved Budget Percent New Unit Amount Lanterns Project (YE Estimates) Residential per Household Year 1 Year 5 Build Out Revenues Property Tax General $987,408 Ind. Calculation $ $13,556 $65,068 General Sales 20,721,135 Ind. Calculation 33,601 302,405 806,413 Motor Vehicle 2,100,423 85 % 98 4,884 43,959 117,224 Utilities Tax 2,025,000 85 94 4,709 42,381 113,015 EMS Transport 1,000,000 85 47 2,325 20,929 55,810 Specific Ownership Tax 238,120 85 11 554 4,984 13,289 Use 18,500 85 1 43 387 1,032 General Intergovernmental 135,000 0 0 License & Permit Tax 89,000 85 4 207 1,863 4,967 Charges for Services 294,444 85 14 685 6,162 16,433 Fines & Forfeitures 475,438 85 22 1,106 9,950 26,534 Other Revenue (Misc) 358,331 85 17 833 7,499 19,998 Investment Earnings 74,854 85 3 174 1,567 4,178 Transfers In from Specific Funds 682,482 85 32 1,587 14,283 38,089 Cost Allocation Fees 2,766,108 85 129 6,432 57,891 154,376 Interfund Loan Revenue 66,016 85 3 154 1,382 3,684 Capital Leases 330,000 85 15 767 6,906 18,417 Total $32,362,259 $489 $58,061 $536,103 $1,458,528 Current Castle Rock Housing Units 18,276 Source: BBC Research & Consulting. Further explanation of these forecasts is provided below. Sales taxes. The city relies heavily on sales tax for general fund operations. Lanterns associated sales tax revenues will be generated by new resident spending within the city. Some additional tax revenue from the purchase of building construction materials within the city is also likely but not included in these forecasts. BBC calculated Lanterns household spending on city taxable retail goods using household expenditure data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Expenditure Survey (CES). These household spending data are available by household income level and geographic region. The CES tables of expenditures by retail category (Appendix Figure A) were used to allocate the after tax income of likely Lanterns residents. Lanterns units are anticipated to attract twoworker households with average family earnings of about $91,000 per year. Two capture rates are applied to the CES expenditure estimates. The first adjustment identifies expenditures that are likely to occur in the city of Castle Rock and the second distinguishes those expenditures that are sales taxable. By this process, each Lanterns household is expected to spend about $23,900 per year in the city of Castle Rock, with approximately 70 percent of the resulting 4.0 percent sales tax accruing to the general fund.

Page 6 Property taxes. The Lanterns anticipates home values averaging $400,000. Residential property is assessed at 7.96 percent of market value. The city has a general mill levy of 1.7 mills, which is a very low taxing rate by metropolitan Denver measures. Each Lanterns home is expected to generate approximately $50 per year to the general fund. Per household revenues. As reflected in the prior Figure 2, the majority of city revenues were forecasted using the existing per household revenue multiplier and the project s build out schedule. Per household revenue multipliers were derived for each line item in the 2012 general fund budget and applied to the cumulative number of Lanterns households. These projections recognize that other land uses besides residential development contribute to city revenues. For instance, non residential development also generates utility taxes, motor vehicle revenues, and various fines and service charges as well as property tax and some sales tax. Based on county property assessment data that document the amount of non residential development in the city, BBC estimates that about 15 percent of Castle Rocks property development is in commercial, retail, industrial, or institutional uses. Sales and property tax aside, BBC estimates that non residential development pays about 15 percent of the city s general fund revenues. City Expenditures In 2012, the city of Castle Rock provided general fund services to approximately 18,300 housing units at a cost of approximately $32 million. The largest service expenses are in the police department; fire and EMS operations; and recreation/parks programs. Figure 3 shows 2012 city expenses by department, per household service costs with adjustments, and forecasts of Lanterns associated service costs during the first year of development, fifth year (stable year), and at build out.

Page 7 Figure 3. Lanterns General Fund Expenditure Effects EXPENSES 2012 Revised Percent Percent New Unit Amount Lanterns Project Budget Amount Residential Variable per Household Year 1 Year 5 Build Out General Administration Administration $1,444,011 85 % 90 % $60 $3,022 $27,199 $72,531 Human Resources 585,414 85 90 25 1,225 11,027 29,405 Community Relations $522,840 85 90 22 1,094 $9,848 26,262 Finance/Purchasing 3,042,885 85 90 127 6,368 57,315 152,841 Data Processing/IT $1,791,893 85 90 75 3,750 $33,752 90,005 Judicial 271,329 85 90 11 568 5,111 13,629 Legal $498,662 85 90 21 1,044 $9,393 25,047 Facilities 989,259 85 90 41 2,070 18,633 49,689 Public Safety Police Department $8,253,561 85 % 90 % $345 $17,274 $155,462 $414,567 Fire and EMS Depts. 8,651,750 85 90 362 18,107 162,963 434,567 Public Works Engineering/Administration 85 % 90 % $0 Community Development Planning & Zoning Division $445,421 85 % 90 % $19 $932 $8,390 $22,373 Parks and Recreation Parks & Open Space $2,693,650 100 % 90 % $133 $6,632 $59,691 $159,175 Streetscape & Trail Maint. 1,670,256 90 90 74 3,701 33,311 88,830 Total Expenditures $30,860,931 $954 $65,788 $592,095 $1,578,919 Annual Revenues Minus Expenditures ($7,727) ($55,991) ($120,391) Current Castle Rock Housing Units 18,276 Cummulative Households 50 450 1,200 Source: BBC Research & Consulting. Non residential costs. In calculating a per household service cost multiplier, this model recognizes that residential development is not the only land use driving municipal costs. All land uses, including retail, industrial, and commercial, require some city services. Traffic management, police department, ambulance services, and road maintenance expenses are all sensitive to the presence of non resident workers, shoppers, and the demands of commercial property for police and fire protection. Variable costs. Virtually all public service organizations have some fixed costs that are not proportionately affected by new residential growth; e.g. city council expenses, city finance or facility maintenance are examples of service costs that may rise with household growth, but will not rise proportionally with new household growth. In the prior Figure 3, estimates of variable costs are shown by expenditure line item. Lanterns Impact By the process described here, we anticipate that the city general fund will experience a small annual loss as a result of the Lanterns project. Figure 4 shows that at build out, projectassociated general fund expenses will reach $1.58 million while revenues are projected at $1.46 million, leaving a shortfall of $120,391 spread over 1,200 units. This equates to $100/per unit/year.

Page 8 Figure 4. General Fund Net Fiscal Impact Source: BBC Research & Consulting, 2013 Net General Fund Lanterns Project Year 1 Year 5 Build Out Revenues $58,061 $536,103 $1,458,528 Expenditures 65,788 592,095 1,578,919 Net Impact ($7,727) ($55,991) ($120,391) Built Units 50 450 1,200 Per Unit General Fund Impact ($155) ($124) ($100) It should also be noted that this projection does not include the project related sales and use taxes that are dedicated to other funds, which are documented later in this report. Impact fees In addition to general fund receipts, the Lanterns development will produce substantial impact fee revenue. As noted in Figure 5, by project completion the Lanterns will generate over $8.1 million in funds for offsite capital expansion elsewhere in Castle Rock. Figure 5. Impact Fees Schedule Source: BBC Research & Consulting. IMPACT FEES (2,600 2,699 sq ft/unit) Total Fees Fee/Unit Parks & Recreation $3,380,300 $3,073 Municipal Facilities 638,000 580 Fire 696,300 633 Police 363,000 330 Transportation 3,097,600 2,816 Total Impact Fees $8,175,200 $7,432 These capital expansion funds are also afforded a share of Lanterns generated use tax. Special Purpose Funds The city of Castle Rock maintains three special purpose funds that use certain dedicated revenues to support specific city functions. Figure 6 documents the additional revenue from the expected increase in the city s sales tax revenue. Figure 6. Dedicated Funds Revenue Impact Dedicated Funds Revenue Impact Year 1 Year 2 Year 5 Build Out Transportation Fund $164,111 $ 339,914 $410,069 $1,042,711 Community Center Fund 26,072 54,653 69,711 178,041 Development Services Fund 220,584 441,169 441,169 1,102,922 Source: BBC Research & Consulting.

Page 9 As noted above, the city s transportation fund will collect over $1.0 million in Lanterns based fees at build out, mostly from a dedication of sales tax (25.0 percent of sales tax collections), but also from an allocation of state highway reimbursements and a share of use taxes. These funds will be available for roadway repair and maintenance throughout the city. Similarly, the Lanterns will produce substantial revenue for the development services fund, which will cover all costs of building review and related services associated with the Lanterns project. Funds to the Community Center are from 5.25 percent of Lanterns local sales tax generation. I hope these calculations have been helpful in communicating the effects of this development on local revenues and service delivery costs. Sincerely, Ford C. Frick Managing Director

Page 10 Appendix A Figure A 1. Per Household Spending Expenditure Category Average Annual Expenditure Percent Spent in Castle Rock Percent Sales Taxable Per Household Spending in Castle Rock Median Household Income before taxes $91,000 $81,767 Food $9,775 $8,783 Food at home 5,307 4,769 95 % 100 % $4,530 Food away from home 4,467 4,014 80 100 3,211 Alcoholic beverages $844 $758 90 % 100 % $683 Housing $25,689 $23,083 Shelter (75% owned dwellings) 15,229 13,684 15 % 100 % $2,053 Utilities and fuels 4,958 4,455 100 100 4,455 Household operations 2,018 1,813 10 100 181 Housekeeping supplies 924 830 100 100 830 Household furnishings and equipment 2,560 2,300 50 100 1,150 Apparel and services $2,821 $2,535 50 % 100 % $1,267 Transportation $13,580 $12,202 Vehicle purchases (net outlay) 4,824 4,335 65 % 0 % $0 Gasoline and motor oil 3,841 3,451 85 0 0 Other vehicle expenses 3,879 3,485 80 30 837 Public and other transportation 1,036 931 80 0 0 Health care $4,742 $4,261 Health insurance 2,561 2,301 0 % 0 % $0 Medical services 1,423 1,278 80 0 0 Drugs 569 511 90 100 460 Medical supplies 190 170 90 100 153 Entertainment $4,325 $3,886 80 % 75 % $2,332 Personal care products and services $1,053 $946 90 % 100 % $852 Reading $188 $169 90 % 100 % $152 Education $1,976 $1,776 100 % 0 % $0 Tobacco products and smoking supplies $321 $288 95 % 0 % $0 Miscellaneous $1,246 $1,220 90 % 75 % $0 Cash contributions $3,123 $2,806 70 % 0 % $0 Personal insurance and pensions $12,084 $10,858 65 % 0 % $0 Total $81,767 $73,471 0 % 0 % $23,901 Annual Per Household Retail Spending $23,901 Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics; BBC Research & Consulting