OVERVIEW OF THE MEDICAID DISPROPORTIONATE SHARE HOSPITAL (DSH) PROGRAM

Similar documents
Jim Frizzera, Principal Health Management Associates

Primer: Disproportionate Share Hospitals

CENTER FOR TAX AND BUDGET ACCOUNTABILITY

Appendix B. Medicaid and the State Children s Health Insurance Program in Texas: History, Current Arrangements, and Options

P. Medicaid Supplemental Payments and Financing Issues

Oklahoma Health Care Authority Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

CRS Report for Congress

Coverage Expansion [Sections 310, 323, 324, 341, 342, 343, 344, and 1701]

WikiLeaks Document Release

Medicaid Financing and Expenditures

Texas Medicaid Program

4012 FORM CMS

Chapter 4 Medicaid Clients

CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web

Medicaid Supplemental Payments

Health Reform Summary March 23, 2010

January 1, State Notification Regarding Exchanges

AHLA. R. Current Issues in Medicaid Supplemental Payments and Financing. Barbara D. A. Eyman Eyman Associates PC Washington, DC

Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013

CRS Report for Congress

Republican Senators Unveil New ACA Repeal and Replace Legislation

Medicaid Program; Disproportionate Share Hospital Payments Uninsured Definition

Governor s FY 2014 Budget: Articles. Staff Presentation to the House Finance Committee February 13, 2013

ACA AHCA BCRA ORRA GCHJ Medicaid. rate 5% each year over a threeyear. period (CYs ), grandfathered federal match for CY 2024 and

Medicaid Spending: A Brief History

Reimbursement and Funding Methodology For Demonstration Year 11. Florida s 1115 Managed Medical Assistance Waiver. Low Income Pool

HFMA DISCUSSION RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN TEXAS SUPPLEMENTAL PAYMENTS JANUARY 2019 BILL GALINSKY & JASON DURRETT

Reimbursement and Funding Methodology. Florida Medicaid Reform Section 1115 Waiver. Low Income Pool

Uncompensated Care Payments and Worksheet S-10. HFMA Maine Chapter

Reimbursement and Funding Methodology. Florida Medicaid Reform Section 1115 Waiver. Low Income Pool

Medicare: Insolvency Projections

SENATE COMMITTEE ON FINANCE AND ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS JOINT SUBCOMMITTEE ON HUMAN SERVICES CLOSING REPORT

Medicaid. (Title XIX and Title XXI) STATE REPORTS FY 2004 IDAHO. Text7:

Comparison of the House and Senate Repeal and Replace Legislation

T H E P O L I C Y P A G E

Senate s BCRA Includes Major Changes to Medicaid and the ACA

Estimating the Impact of Repealing the Affordable Care Act on Hospitals

The Present and Future of. Medicaid. Presenter - David Salsberry August 17, 2017

MEDICAID: STATE DISPROPORTIONATE SHARE HOSPITAL ALLOTMENT REDUCTIONS FOR FYs 2014 AND 2015 FINAL RULE SUMMARY. September 17, 2013

South Carolina Medicaid Disproportionate Share Reimbursement Summit March 21, 2018

The Future of Healthcare from a Public Health System Perspective. George V. Masi President and Chief Executive Officer

Tips and Tricks For Understanding Worksheet S-10. Presented By Ellen Donahue, Senior Manager October 3, 2017

Thirty-six states stand to lose at least $100 million in federal funding. 1

Medicaid. (Title XIX and Title XXI) STATE REPORTS FY Division of Health Services Research OREGON. SUK-FONG S TANG, PhD.

Medicaid. (Title XIX and Title XXI) STATE REPORTS FY Division of Health Services Research MICHIGAN. SUK-FONG S TANG, PhD.

Affordable Care Act Repeal and Replacement Legislation

Impact of the MMA on Dual Eligible Beneficiaries and State Medicaid Programs. Joy Johnson Wilson, Health Policy Director, NCSL

HOUSE REPUBLICANS RELEASE ACA REPLACEMENT PLAN

Medicaid. (Title XIX and Title XXI) STATE REPORTS FY Division of Health Services Research TEXAS. SUK-FONG S TANG, PhD.

Medicaid. (Title XIX and Title XXI) STATE REPORTS FY Division of Health Services Research OKLAHOMA. SUK-FONG S TANG, PhD.

Medicaid. (Title XIX and Title XXI) STATE REPORTS FY Division of Health Services Research NEW HAMPSHIRE. SUK-FONG S TANG, PhD.

Draft as of. Hospitals. To be completed by organizations that answer yes to Form 990, Part VII, Line 9. (c) Total community benefit expense

Medicaid. (Title XIX and Title XXI) STATE REPORTS FY 2004 TENNESSEE. Text7:

DEFICIT REDUCTION ACT OF 2005: IMPLICATIONS FOR MEDICAID PREMIUMS AND COST SHARING CHANGES

Low Income Pool SFY

Medicaid. (Title XIX and Title XXI) STATE REPORTS FY 2004 ARKANSAS. Text7:

Medicaid. (Title XIX and Title XXI) STATE REPORTS FY 2004 LOUISIANA. Text7:

Small Rural Hospital Transition (SRHT) Project Guide

Role of Community Mental Health Centers In Texas Medicaid 1115 Demonstration Waiver

Current Issues in Medicaid Financing An Overview of IGTs, UPLs, and DSH. By David Rousseau and Andy Schneider

National Association of Public Hospitals and Health Systems. Final Rule Regarding Cost Limit for Public Providers and Defining Public Status

Medicaid. (Title XIX and Title XXI) STATE REPORTS FY 2004 KANSAS. Text7:

MEDICAID AND BUDGET RECONCILIATION: IMPLICATIONS OF THE CONFERENCE REPORT

Budget Uncertainty in Medicaid. Federal Funds Information for States

Medicaid. (Title XIX and Title XXI) STATE REPORTS FY 2005 SOUTH CAROLINA. Text7:

RHP 9, 10 & 18 Learning Collaborative. Ardas Khalsa Deputy Medicaid CHIP Director Texas Health and Human Services Commission February 22, 2017

Select Provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , H.R Overview: Disproportionate Share Hospital (DSH) Payments:

AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT OF 2009 SUMMARY - MEDICAID PROVISIONS

Health Care Reform Reference Guide

Medicare: Insolvency Projections

Health Reform HEALTH REFORM IMPLEMENTATION TIMELINE

July 27, 2018 Emergency Board Meeting Report on Medicaid for Fiscal Year 2018

Program Update. October 26, 2017

Medicare DSH Update and Recent Developments TAHFA & HFMA Lone Star Chapter West Texas Seminar * Winds of Change * February 13, 2015

The Affordable Care Act: Opportunities to Influence Implementation

Presentation to the Actuaries Club of the Southwest

Health Reform Implementation Timeline

MEDICAID: STATE DISPROPORTIONATE SHARE HOSPITAL ALLOTMENT REDUCTIONS FOR FYs 2014 AND 2015 SUMMARY

Medicaid. (Title XIX and Title XXI) STATE REPORTS FY 2007 FLORIDA. Text7:

medicaid and the uninsured

Medicaid Financing and Expenditures

HIGHLIGHTS OF THE HEALTH REFORM RECONCILIATION BILL AS OF 3/15/2010

Executive Waiver Committee. February 2, :00 a.m. 12:00 p.m.

THE IMPACT OF THE MEDICAID BUDGETARY CRISIS ON RURAL COMMUNITIES

Many states entered FY 2005 faced with a mix of good and bad. A National Challenge: How States Try to Control Medicaid Costs and Why It Is So Hard*

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA)

Here are some highlights of the revised Senate language released July 13:

Summary of Healthy Indiana Plan: Key Facts and Issues

Evaluation of the Low-Income Pool Program Using Milestone Data: SFY

Health Insurance Glossary of Terms

Health Reform and NACo Policy

Key Medicaid Financing Changes in Repeal and Replace Legislation

Introduction. Medicare and Medicaid: A Brief Introduction. Definitions. Insurance. ECON Fall 2007

FY 2010 BUDGET REDUCTIONS - SUMMARY OF ISSUES ARIZONA HEALTH CARE COST CONTAINMENT SYSTEM GENERAL FUND

How it helps individuals and families who live with mental illness

Factors Affecting the Development of Medicaid Hospital Payment Policies

Reforming The Medicaid Disproportionate-Share Hospital Program

WebMemo22. Health Care Reform in Massachusetts: Medicaid Waiver Renewal Will Set a Precedent. Published by The Heritage Foundation

1115 Waiver Extension and Low Income Pool Update

Fiscal Year 2016 Approved Budget Executive Summary

Transcription:

OVERVIEW OF THE MEDICAID DISPROPORTIONATE SHARE HOSPITAL (DSH) PROGRAM Prepared by the Legislative Budget Board Staff for the House Select Committee on State Health Care Expenditures February 11, 2004

Disproportionate Share Hospital (DSH) Purpose The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981 allowed states to access additional federal funds to reimburse hospitals in the form of DSH payments. The Medicaid DSH program provides supplemental payments to hospitals that serve large numbers of Medicaid beneficiaries and low-income or uninsured patients. Hospitals receive DSH payments to offset the costs not covered by payments from Medicaid, third-party reimbursement, and patient revenue collections. Legislative Budget Board Page 2

DSH Program Funding DSH payments have the same matching rate* as medical services (60.87% federal, 39.13% state in FFY 2004). DSH payments, however, differ from other Medicaid payments because DSH payments do not reimburse for any specific patient s services. Federal appropriations for each state, plus the amount of state or local matching funds needed to draw down the total amount of available federal funds, determines the size of Texas DSH payments. DSH payments may not exceed 12% of total state Medicaid expenditures. *Federal Medical Assistance Percentage, or FMAP, is based on a state s three-year average per capita income relative to the national per capita income. The enhanced FMAP related to state fiscal relief provisions does not apply to the DSH program. Legislative Budget Board Page 3

DSH Program Implementation By the mid-1980s, very few states had implemented DSH programs. To increase states participation in the DSH program, federal regulations were published in 1985 that allowed states to generate matching funds through provider taxes and donations. By 1992, 39 states had implemented provider taxes or provider donation programs. DSH payments increased nationally from $5.3 billion in FY 1991 to $17.5 billion in FY 1992. Texas DSH program grew from $338.1 million (All Funds) in FY 1991 to $1.5 billion (All Funds) in FY 1992. Legislative Budget Board Page 4

Texas DSH Program Funding Figure 1 Texas Disproportionate Share Hospital Expenditures Federal Fiscal Years 1991-1997 In Millions Total Funding $1,513.1 $1,513.0 $1,513.1 $1,513.0 $1,513.0 $1,513.1 $542.0 $538.0 $542.0 $555.5 $570.4 $566.5 $971.1 $975.0 $971.1 $957.5 $942.6 $946.6 $338.1 $123.3 $214.8 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 Federal Share State Share Federal Fiscal Year Sources: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and Legislative Budget Board. Legislative Budget Board Page 5

DSH Program Funding Congress passed the Medicaid Voluntary Contribution and Provider Specific Tax Amendments of 1991 to curb the significant increase in DSH payments. As a result of a ban on provider donations and a cap on provider taxes, states turned to intergovernmental transfers (IGTs) as a revenue source to draw down federal funds under the DSH program.* Appropriations of General Revenue made to state-owned hospitals and mental health facilities are counted as match for the DSH program. Nine large-volume Medicaid public hospitals transfer local funds to the state to draw down DSH funds for local hospitals. * IGTs are fund exchanges among or between different levels of government. Legislative Budget Board Page 6

Texas DSH Program Funding In Millions Figure 2 Texas Disproportionate Share Hospital Funding Federal Fiscal Years 1998-2005 Total Funding $1,572.0 $1,521.2 $1,496.2 $1,479.7 $593.0 $1,420.8 $571.2 $1,375.7 $1,313.6 $595.5 $564.9 $1,294.2 $541.5 $507.6 $517.8 $579.0 $979.0 $950.0 $806.0 $834.2 $855.9 $776.4 $900.7 $900.7 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Federal Cap State Share Federal Fiscal Year Sources: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and Legislative Budget Board. Legislative Budget Board Page 7

DSH Program Funding DSH payments decreased beginning in 1999 as a result of the passage of the Balanced Budget Act (BBA) of 1997, which established new federal DSH allotments for FYs 1998-2002. Thereafter, state allotments would be the previous year s allocation adjusted by inflation. Congress later passed the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Benefits Improvement and Protections Act (BIPA) of 2000, which provided temporary relief to states by increasing state allotments for FY 2001 and FY 2002. For FY 2003, BIPA reverted state allocations to capped amounts in the BBA of 1997. Legislative Budget Board Page 8

Recent DSH Federal Legislation Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 Each state will receive a 16% increase over its FY 2003 DSH allotment. Thereafter, each state will continue to receive its FY 2004 allotment until it equals or no longer exceeds the allotment amount determined under the methodology of the BBA of 1997. Texas will receive $900.7 million in DSH payments for FY 2004 (an increase of $124.2 million over FY 2003). This annual allocation continues through FY 2010; beginning in FY 2011 this amount may be adjusted by inflation. State allotments will still be subject to the 12% cap. Legislative Budget Board Page 9

DSH Hospital Criteria While Congress stipulates a minimum criteria, it provides flexibility to states to determine which hospitals are eligible for DSH funds and how these funds are distributed. There are qualifying criteria that determine whether a hospital receives a DSH payment. Hospitals must have at least a 1% Medicaid utilization rate.* Hospitals must have at least two physicians with staff privileges at the hospital, who have agreed to provide non-emergency obstetrical services to Medicaid clients. * Medicaid Utilization Rate = the total number of inpatient days attributed to Medicaid patients divided by the hospital s total inpatient days. Legislative Budget Board Page 10

DSH Federal Payment Limits Federal rules set out some payment limitations for DSH hospitals. No hospital can receive a DSH payment that exceeds the hospital s unreimbursed costs of Medicaid and uninsured patients. Federal law sets a limit on DSH payments to mental health hospitals, which the federal government terms Institutions for Mental Disease (IMDs). The IMD limit is the lessor of: (1) the state s total 1995 DSH amount for IMDs (All Funds) or (2) 33% of the state s DSH federal allotment. Texas IMD limit for FY 2003 was $250.2 million. Legislative Budget Board Page 11

DSH Payments for State-owned Hospitals State-owned hospitals receive 100% of their unreimbursed costs for Medicaid or uninsured patients. If the payments to the state mental facilities would exceed the federal IMD limit, payments are adjusted proportionately to bring total IMD payments under the IMD limit. After the state-owned hospitals payments are calculated, remaining DSH funds are available for payment to non-state DSH hospitals. Legislative Budget Board Page 12

State-owned DSH Program Figure 3 DSH State Transfers Actual State Fiscal Year 2003 Amounts 10 MHMR Facilities = $273.5 Million* Texas Center for Infectious Disease = $10.1 Million UT Medical Branch at Galveston = $89.0 Million M. D. Anderson = $88.8 Million UT Health Center at Tyler = $18.8 Million Total $480.2 Million Transfer to HHSC General Revenue equal to 100% of unreimbursed costs for Medicaid and uninsured patients $480.2 Million General Revenue HHSC draws Federal Funds at FMAP (60.01% Federal) $192.1 Million GR draws + $288.1 Million Federal $480.2 Million (All Funds) $288.1 Million GR HHSC makes All Funds payment back to hospitals $192.1 Million GR $288.1 Million Federal $480.2 Million Total $288.1 Million Balance = State Revenue *Note: SFY IMD amount exceeds FFY IMD limit due to payments based on 1 month of FFY 2002 and 11 months of FFY 2003. Legislative Budget Board Page 13

Distribution of Texas State-owned Hospital DSH Funding Figure 4 Distribution of Texas State-owned Disproportionate Share Hospital Funding State Fiscal Year 2003 Total = $480.1 M UT Medical Branch at Galveston $89.0 M or 19% MHMR Facilities $273.5 M or 57% M. D. Anderson $88.8 M or 18% UT Health Center at Tyler $18.8 M or 4% Sources: Legislative Budget Board; Health and Human Services Commission. Texas Center for Infectious Disease $10.1 M or 2% Legislative Budget Board Page 14

Distribution of Texas DSH Funding Figure 5 Distribution of Texas Disproportionate Share Hospital Funding State Fiscal Year 2003 Total = $1,320.5 M State-owned Hospitals $480.1 M or 36% Local Hospitals $840.4 M or 64% Sources: Legislative Budget Board; Health and Human Services Commission. Legislative Budget Board Page 15

DSH Federal Legislation Medicaid Voluntary Contribution and Provider Specific Tax Amendments of 1991 Banned provider donations. Capped provider taxes. Proposed provider tax criteria. Capped DSH payments at 1992 levels. Limited state DSH programs to to 12% of total Medicaid expenditures. Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 Limited participation to hospitals with at least a 1% Medicaid utilization rate.* Limited DSH payments to a hospital to no more than the unreimbursed costs of Medicaid patients and low-income or uninsured patients. * Medicaid Utilization Rate = the total number of inpatient days attributed to Medicaid patients divided by the hospital s total inpatient days. Legislative Budget Board Page 16

DSH Federal Legislation Balanced Budget Act (BBA) of 1997 Established new federal DSH allotments to states for FYs 1998-2002. Thereafter, state allotments would be the previous year s allocation adjusted by inflation (subject to 12% cap). Imposed limitations on DSH payments to state mental hospitals. Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Benefits Improvement and Protections Act (BIPA) of 2000 Provided temporary relief to states by increasing state allotments for FY 2001 and FY 2002. For FY 2003, reverted state allocations to capped amounts in the BBA of 1997. Implemented reporting requirements. Legislative Budget Board Page 17

DSH Federal Reporting Requirements States must submit: An annual report that identifies: Each DSH hospital that received a payment. The amount each DSH hospital received. An annual, independent certified audit that verifies: Hospitals receiving DSH payments have reduced their uncompensated care costs to reflect DSH payments received. The state compliance with limiting DSH payments to a hospital to no more than the unreimbursed costs of Medicaid patients and low-income or uninsured patients; the methodology used to calculate unreimbursed costs; and the records maintained by the state regarding claimed costs, expenditures and payments. Legislative Budget Board Page 18