WID.world/TECHNICAL/NOTE/SERIES/N /2015/7/

Similar documents
Working paper series. Simplified Distributional National Accounts. Thomas Piketty Emmanuel Saez Gabriel Zucman. January 2019

TOP INCOMES IN THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA OVER THE TWENTIETH CENTURY

Recent Development in Income Inequality in Thailand

A. Data Sample and Organization. Covered Workers

Distributional National Accounts DINA

The MIT Press Journals

Fiscal Fact. Reversal of the Trend: Income Inequality Now Lower than It Was under Clinton. Introduction. By William McBride

Income Inequality in France, : Evidence from Distributional National Accounts (DINA)

Inequality Dynamics in France, : Evidence from Distributional National Accounts (DINA)

Striking it Richer: The Evolution of Top Incomes in the United States (Updated with 2009 and 2010 estimates)

Introduction of World Wealth and Income Database

High incomes and personal taxation in Colombia

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES TOP INCOMES IN THE LONG RUN OF HISTORY. Anthony B. Atkinson Thomas Piketty Emmanuel Saez

Summary of the Latest Federal Income Tax Data, 2018 Update

Spain:'Estimates'of'Top'Income'Shares' ,' and'revision'for' ' ' ' Facundo(Alvaredo( and(luis(estévez(bauluz( ( ( September(2014' (

Taxable Income Elasticities. 131 Undergraduate Public Economics Emmanuel Saez UC Berkeley

Summary of Latest Federal Income Tax Data

Applying Generalized Pareto Curves to Inequality Analysis

Distributional National Accounts (DINA) Guidelines : Concepts and Methods used in WID.world

Volume 35, Issue 2. Pedro Ferreira de Souza Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (Ipea) and University of Brasília (UnB)

Examining the Great Leveling: New Evidence on Midcentury American Income and Wages

Measuring Wealth Inequality in Europe: A Quest for the Missing Wealthy

Income and Wealth Concentration in Switzerland over the 20 th Century

Summary of the Latest Federal Income Tax Data, 2017 Update

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES GLOBAL INEQUALITY DYNAMICS: NEW FINDINGS FROM WID.WORLD

WHAT DO HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS SUGGEST ABOUT THE TOP 1% INCOMES AND INEQUALITY IN OECD COUNTRIES? Nicolas Ruiz (OECD)

Estimating Inequality with Tax Data: The Problem of Pass-Through Income

Striking it Richer: The Evolution of Top Incomes in the United States (Updated with 2017 preliminary estimates)

Over the last 40 years, the U.S. federal tax system has undergone three

The Material Well-Being of the Poor and the Middle Class since 1980

Top Wealth Shares in the United States, : Evidence from Estate Tax Returns

Income Inequality and Progressive Income Taxation in China and India, Thomas Piketty and Nancy Qian

Reassessing Trends in U.S. Top Income Shares: The Role of Population and Productivity Growth

INCOME INEQUALITY IN THE UNITED STATES, *

The Distribution of US Wealth, Capital Income and Returns since Emmanuel Saez (UC Berkeley) Gabriel Zucman (LSE and UC Berkeley)

How Closely Do Top Income Shares Track Other Measures of Inequality? Andrew Leigh * Abstract

Introduction to Taxes and Transfers: Income Distribution, Poverty, Taxes and Transfers. 131 Undergraduate Public Economics Emmanuel Saez UC Berkeley

Income Inequality Measurement in Greece and Alternative Data Sources:

The World Wealth and Income Database (WID.world) aims to provide open and convenient access to the historical evolution of

Graduate Public Finance

Health and Retirement Study Imputations of Lifetime Earnings Records

Income Inequality in France, : Evidence from Distributional National Accounts (DINA)

!"#$%&'$()!*%+,+#$%-#$)#-.'+%&#,/.0%-0,$#-%)!%.0#%1!).#2%-.,.#-3% : #;)2#!<#%=$'>%#-.,.#%.,?%$#.1$!- #JJKLHDM%-KDG

About Capital in the 21 st Century

Changes in the Distribution of After-Tax Wealth: Has Income Tax Policy Increased Wealth Inequality?

Income Inequality in France, : Evidence from Distributional National Accounts (DINA)

From Communism to Capitalism: Private Versus Public Property and Inequality in China and Russia

WID.world$WORKING$PAPER$SERIES$N $2015/6$

Taxing the Rich More: Evidence from the 2013 Tax Increase

From Communism to Capitalism: Private vs. Public Property and Rising. Inequality in China and Russia

Distributional National Accounts: Methods and Estimates for the United States

How Progressive is the U.S. Federal Tax System? A Historical and International Perspective

Estimating the regional distribution of income in sub-saharan Africa

Lecture 4: Income Taxes Over Time & Across Countries

Richer or more Numerous or both? The Role of Population and Economic Growth for Top Income Shares

!! Inequality in Poland: Estimating the whole distribution by g-percentile,

Online Appendix of. This appendix complements the evidence shown in the text. 1. Simulations

EMBARGOED UNTIL TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 17, Issue Brief

Wealth Inequality Reading Summary by Danqing Yin, Oct 8, 2018

Inequality in Oregon

Finance, an Inequality Factor

ECONOMIC COMMENTARY. Income Inequality Matters, but Mobility Is Just as Important. Daniel R. Carroll and Anne Chen

Incomes Across the Distribution Dataset

Income Inequality in Korea,

Steven N. Kaplan* and Joshua Rauh*

Policy Brief March 2017

No Rise in Income Inequality?

Measuring the Trends in Inequality of Individuals and Families: Income and Consumption

Income and Wage Inequality in the United States,

Growth, Inequality, and Social Welfare: Cross-Country Evidence

The Role of Capital Income for Top Income Shares in Germany

QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS

Sarah K. Burns James P. Ziliak. November 2013

Reported Incomes and Marginal Tax Rates, : Evidence and Policy Implications

What Do the States Tell us About Rising Top Income Shares?

The Elephant Curve of Global Inequality and Growth *

Inequality, thecrisis, and stagnation

Notes and Definitions Numbers in the text, tables, and figures may not add up to totals because of rounding. Dollar amounts are generally rounded to t

Online Appendix to: The Composition Effects of Tax-Based Consolidations on Income Inequality. June 19, 2017

These three points are elaborated below. 820 First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC Tel: Fax:

PWBM WORKING PAPER SERIES MATCHING IRS STATISTICS OF INCOME TAX FILER RETURNS WITH PWBM SIMULATOR MICRO-DATA OUTPUT.

Measuring inequality Issues to be addressed by the HLEG subgroup on income and wealth inequality

Obamacare Tax Subsidies: Bigger Deficit, Fewer Taxpayers, Damaged Economy

The Economic Program. June 2014

On the distribution of wealth and the share of inheritance

The SOI Databank: A case study in leveraging administrative data in support of evidence-based policymaking

Real Median Family Income is Falling. Family incomes have stagnated since the mid-1980s. Income in 2012 ($51,017) is lower than in 1989 ($51,681).

OVERALL FEDERAL TAX BURDEN ON MOST FAMILIES AT LOWEST LEVELS SINCE AT LEAST Income Taxes for Median Family of Four at Lowest Level Since 1957

Deciphering the fall and rise in the net capital share by Matthew Rognlie, MIT BPEA Conference Draft (March, 2015)

Top incomes and inequality in the UK: reconciling estimates from household survey and tax return data

Accounting for Wealth Inequality Dynamics: Methods, Estimates and Simulations for France ( )

Recent Trends in Top Income Shares in the USA: Reconciling Estimates from March CPS and IRS Tax Return Data

Extract from Divided We Stand: Why Inequality Keeps Rising

Working paper series. Distributional national accounts: Methods and estimates for the United States. Thomas Piketty Emmanuel Saez Gabriel Zucman

Results are preliminary. Comments welcome.

INCOME MOBILITY IN THE U.S. FROM 1996 TO 2005 REPORT OF THE

EVIDENCE ON INEQUALITY AND THE NEED FOR A MORE PROGRESSIVE TAX SYSTEM

INCOME AND WEALTH INEQUALITY: EVIDENCE AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS*

The Effect of State Taxes on the Geographical Location of Top Earners: Evidence from Star Scientists

Distributional,National,Accounts:, Methods,and,Estimates,for,the,United,States,,, Thomas'Piketty,'Emmanuel'Saez' and'gabriel'zucman'

Transcription:

! WID.world/TECHNICAL/NOTE/SERIES/N /2015/7/! Frank&Sommeiller&Price/Series/for/Top/Income/Shares/ by/us/states/since/1917/ / / MarkFrank,EstelleSommeiller, MarkPriceandEmmanuelSaez July2015/

The World Top Incomes Database Methodological Notes July 2015 Frank-Sommeiller-Price Series for Top Income Shares by US States since 1917 Mark Frank, Estelle Sommeiller, Mark Price, and Emmanuel Saez 1 We have incorporated in the World Top Income Database the top income shares for each US state since 1917 using the series originally developed by Mark Frank, Estelle Sommeiller, and Mark Price. The series have been adjusted to be consistent with the Piketty and Saez US wide series for income including realized capital gains. All income values are reported in current dollars and need to be deflated using the CPI2014 variable (consumer price index, base 2014) to obtain real values. We plan on updating regularly these state series each year. Methodology We have proceeded as follows starting from the Sommeiller-Price and the Frank series. These two sets of series were created independently. The Sommeiller-Price series cover 1917-2012. They were originally created in Sommeiller s PhD dissertation (Sommeiller, 2006) and later updated and published in Sommeiller and Price (2014). The Sommeiller-Price series can be downloaded online at http://www.epi.org/publication/unequal-states/ The Frank series initially covered the period 1945-2004 and were published in Frank (2009). Frank (2014) later updated the series to 1916-2012. The Frank series can be downloaded online at http://www.shsu.edu/eco_mwf/inequality.html We start from the Sommeiller-Price series since 1917 because they provide more percentiles than the Frank series. 2 The Sommeiller-Frank series also follow more closely the Piketty-Saez methodology before 1942, when only a fairly small fraction of families filed income tax returns. 3 After 1941, when the vast majority of families file tax returns, the Sommeiller-Price series and the Frank series are fairly close (see below).!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 1 The original state level series were created by Mark Frank, Estelle Sommeiller, and Mark Price. Emmanuel Saez just helped coordinate the minor adjustments to the original Frank and Sommeiller-Price series, needed to make them comparable to the Piketty-Saez series. We thank Yang Chen for outstanding research assistance in preparing all the series for posting on the WTID starting from the original Frank and Sommeiller-Price series. 2 Frank series include the top 10 and top 1 income shares, as well as a number of other inequality indexes such as the Gini, Theil, or Atkinson indexes. 3 The Sommeiller-Price series take into account non-filers. The Frank series compute top income shares within the set of tax filers.

Piketty-Saez series benchmarking. The Sommeiller-Price series still differ from the Piketty-Saez series because not all the adjustments carried out by Piketty-Saez can be done at the state level (due to lack of information on the composition of incomes, and in particular realized capital gains, by brackets in the state level statistics). 4 Fortunately, Sommeiller-Price also provide US wide series that are created using the same methodology that they apply to each state. Hence, comparing the US wide Sommeiller-Price series to the Piketty- Saez series allows us to assess the discrepancies that arise because of the difference in methodologies. Fortunately, the difference between these two series is fairly modest and both series have the same overall U-shape over the century. Nevertheless, to correct for this difference, we simply re-adjust each state series in each year by the ratio of the Piketty-Saez series (series including realized capital gains) to the US wide Sommeiller-Frank series for the corresponding year. For example, if the US wide Sommeiller-Frank series has a top 1 income share of 20 in year t and the Piketty-Saez series has a top 1 income share of 22 in the year t, we multiply the top 1 state level income shares by 22/20=1.1 in year t for all states. As an additional check, we have also applied the same correction strategy to the Frank series (using Frank US wide series). The correct Sommeiller-Price series and the corrected Frank series are pretty close for the post 1941 period. 5 Imputations for 1983-1985. Next, the Sommeiller-Price series do not cover years 1983-1985 but the Frank series include the years 1983-1985 thanks to unpublished tabulations that Frank obtained directly from the Statistics of Income division of the IRS. Therefore, we use the Frank series to impute 1983-1985 values so as to have a complete annual series from 1917 to 2012. Wyoming 2012 typo. Finally, as statistics for the State of Wyoming for the top $1m+ bracket have a typo in 2012 (the average income in this bracket is over $10m, which a totally implausible value leading to an absurdly high top 1 income share that year), we correct for this typo by assuming that the average income in top $1m+ in 2012 in Wyoming is equal to its 2011 value adjusted for the US wide growth in the average income in the top $1m+ bracket from 2011 to 2012.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 4!In particular, the micro-level annual public use files available since 1960 do not have state information for high income returns. Hence, they cannot be used for the estimation of state level top income shares. Therefore, all the estimations have to rely on state level tabulations created by the Statistics of Income of the IRS using internal data. Such tabulations for recent years are posted at http://www.irs.gov/uac/soi-tax-stats-historic-table-2 5 Some significant differences arise between the two corrected series in the period 2002-2009 when the IRS Statistics of Income only published State level income tax statistics up to a top AGI bracket of $200,000 and above. Before 2002 and after 2009, the top bracket is $1,000,000 and above. See Internal Revenue Service, Statistics of Income Division, Individual Income and Tax Data, by State and Size of Adjusted Gross Income, online at http://www.irs.gov/uac/soi-tax-stats-historic-table-2 Frank uses a split sample imputation while Sommeiller-Price use a Pareto interpolation, explaining the differences in the two series for these years when the top threshold of $200,000 is below the top 1 threshold. For imputations above the top bracket, the Pareto interpolation is preferable and hence we decided to follow the Sommeiller-Price series.

Dataset description We provide the dataset in two versions. Version 1: A Stata format file (US_state_level.dta) containing the following variables: Year (year), State (state in full name), st (state ID from 1 to 51 (0 for the United States), alphabetical order), Top10_adj, Top5_adj, Top1_adj, Top05_adj, Top01_adj, Top001_adj (top income shares for the top 10, 5, 1,.5,.1,.01 respectively, including capital gains, expressed in percent), N_TaxReturn (number of tax returns filed in the state) in thousand, N_TaxUnit (number of tax units in the State, if everybody had been required to file a tax return) in thousand, AvgInc (average income per tax unit, current US Dollars), TotalInc (total income including imputed income of non-filers, current million US Dollars), AGI (total Adjusted Gross Income reported by tax filers, current million US Dollars), CPI14 (Consumer price index, CPI-U-RS series, base 1 in 2014). From these variables, it is straightforward to recover real values for average income in each group. The variables are provided for each state from 1917 to 2012, as well as for the full United States (Piketty-Saez series including realized capital gains). Version 2: An Excel format file (US_state_level.xlsx) containing the variables described above (which correspond both to the country and state levels), as well as all the other variables available in the World Top Incomes Database at the country level.

References Frank, Mark. W. 2009 "Inequality and Growth in the United States: Evidence from a New State-Level Panel of Income Inequality Measure" Economic Inquiry, Volume 47, Issue 1, Pages 55-68. Frank, Mark. W. 2014 "A New State-Level Panel of Annual Inequality Measures over the Period 1916-2005" Journal of Business Strategies, vol. 31, no. 1, pages 241-263. Internal Revenue Service, Statistics of Income Division, Individual Income and Tax Data, by State and Size of Adjusted Gross Income, online at http://www.irs.gov/uac/soi-tax-stats-historic-table-2 Piketty, Thomas and Emmanuel Saez Income Inequality in the United States, 1913-1998, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 2003, 1-39, series updated to 2014 in June 2015. Sommeiller, Estelle. Regional Income Inequality in the United States, 1913 2003. PhD. dissertation, University of Delaware, 2006. Sommeiller, Estelle, and Mark Price The Increasingly Unequal States of America Income Inequality by State, 1917 to 2011, Economic Analysis and Research Network Report, February 2014.