The week's focus. Employment change (monthly average) change 3M y/y % change 6M %pt change 6M, 000s change 7Y, 000s change 4Y %pt % total % total

Similar documents
The fortnight s focus. q/q% France: real GDP hard data estimate*

One year on from François Hollande's social-liberal shift

Very solid Q3; excellent story, but priced in; TP upped to 60.00; downgrade to neutral. Q3 2016: Very solid quarter, better than expected

Flash Economics. What must we assume if we do not believe long-term interest rates will rise sharply in the peripheral eurozone

Flash Economics. What happens when the Federal Reserve starts raising its interest rates? 14 September

Has no impact on growth; Leads to a rise in interest rates;

Flash Economics. What difference does it make having a stable oil price at 50 dollars a barrel or an oil price rising by 10 dollars per year?

Flash Economics. US monetary policy: What matters more: The Fed Funds rate or the size of the Federal Reserve s balance sheet?

Flash Economics. What adjustments are possible when unemployment returns to the structural unemployment level?

Flash Economics. Gradually less expansionary monetary policy in the United States: Could it trigger a rise in long-term interest rates?

Flash Economics. Potential black swans. 16 June

Flash Economics. What will happen when long-term interest rates rise in the United States and the euro zone?

Flash Economics. International monetary system: Return to Bretton Woods September

Flash Economics. Euro zone, France: Potential risk of a "scissor effect" in March

Flash Economics. One concern in the United States: Commercial real estate. 07 October

Flash Economics. Because the structural unemployment rate is high in the euro zone, its growth phases are shorter than in the United States

In particular, we want to see whether: We find: The causes appear to be:

Flash Economics. A simple dollar/euro exchange-rate determination model. 20 February

Flash Economics. What is the ECB s real objective? 05 December

Flash Economics. What is the direction of the causality between real interest rates and total factor productivity growth?

Flash Economics. Euro zone and France: No one can now deny that it is supply-side policies that are needed.

Flash Economics. The three types of capitalism. 21 December

Flash Economics. The discount rate of supply-side policies. 16 May

Flash Economics. Will the euro zone s structural unemployment fall before unemployment catches up with it?

Flash Economics. Two very important structural differences between Germany and the rest of the euro zone: How can the euro zone function?

On public finances; On financial asset prices; The risks seem to come from:

Flash Economics. 11 January

Flash Economics. Can France afford its legitimate economic policy objectives? 06 April

Flash Economics. What to expect from the rise in oil prices for growth in the euro zone and France? 16 January

We seek to determine whether:

Flash Economics. The acceleration in global trade is very good for the euro zone; what accounts for it?

Flash Economics. Over-expansionary monetary policies: A real estate bubble always appears in the end. 16 January

Negatively to labour force skills; Negatively to R&D spending;

Athena Wealth Management. March 2017 Investment Research Report

Flash Economics. 13 September

Flash Economics. Growing heterogeneity in living standards between euro-zone countries: A temporary or permanent feature?

Flash Economics. The more Germany accumulates external assets, the more unlikely a break-up of the euro zone and the more a strong euro hurts Germany

Renewed optimism in the markets

Employment Trend Still Strong in North America

Flash Economics. Why has the euro zone s current-account balance improved? 25 August

Flash Economics. Should governments in the euro zone make additional public investments? 10 October

Monitor Euro area deflation

CORPORATE & INVESTMENT BANKING

Flash Economics. What can be done if total factor productivity diverges between euro-zone countries? 01 December

Flash Economics. The end of quantitative easing in the euro zone: Will banks step in for the ECB to buy government bonds?

Flash Economics. Does monetary policy have an effect on structural unemployment? 16 January

Flash Economics. Is an increase in euro-zone inflation plausible? 27 February

Flash Economics. Measured GDP and true GDP. 14 September

Disappointing Start of the Year for Canada s Economy

Flash Economics. France: Is it possible to return to full employment without increasing inequalities? 08 December

Flash Economics. The common characteristics of countries where labour force skills are weak. 25 October

Flash Economics. Could there no longer be any credible reserve currency? 22 March

Oil at Lowest Point in Nearly a Year

Editor: Thomas Nilsson. The Week Ahead Key Events 31 Jul 6 Aug, 2017

Leumi. Global Economics Monthly Review. Arie Tal, Research Economist. July 12, Capital Markets Division, Economics Department. leumiusa.

Flash Economics. Four serious new threats for the euro zone. 12 December

Flash Economics. A euro-zone budget: How, why, when? 19 January

Economic and Financial Markets Monthly Review & Outlook Detailed Report January 2018

The oil price; US tax policy; US inflation and monetary policy; The Italian economy and banks;

Figure 1 Global Economic Data

Flash Economics. The attempts to save Keynesianism in the euro zone are tiresome. 25 January

Flash Economics. Does fiscal policy change course when the long-term interest rate goes above or below the growth rate?

The new budgetary measures in the 2016 Federal Budget will make deficits balloon

TheFinancialEngineer

Flash Economics. Are Asian countries now managing their exchange rates based on movements in the Chinese RMB?

Editor: Felix Ewert. The Week Ahead Key Events 2 8 Oct, 2017

Reading the Markets Sweden

The rise and fall of gold. December 2013

A SLOWER FIRST QUARTER A

China and Hong Kong Forex Market Developments One-way appreciation carrying into the new year

Latino Decisions 2016 Texas Election Eve Poll N=400 MoE +/-3.5% (Field Dates November 2-7, 2016)

Latino Decisions 2016 Election Eve Poll

What s next? A macro view of 2018

Flash Economics. Are the elites unaware that there is a problem? 05 September

Another disappointing quarter for the U.S. economy

Editor: Thomas Nilsson. The Week Ahead Key Events Jul, 2017

Interest Rate Forecast

Canada s trade balance winds up the first quarter on a sour note

[ ] WEEKLY CHANGES AGAINST THE USD

China and Hong Kong Forex Market Developments RMB made the nine-month peak and FX reserves further expanded

Latino Decisions 2016 Colorado Election Eve Poll N=400 MoE +/-4.9% (Field Dates November 2-7, 2016)

UK Outlook. Steady as she goes for the economy. February Economic Research Unit

Euro area fundamentals #1 Potential growth important for bond yields

Economic Update: Fed Delay Bought Calm. But is it Calm Enough to Hike Rates? 2016 AAM Investment Conference Chris Low FTN Financial Chief Economist

Economic and Financial Markets Monthly Review & Outlook Detailed Report October 2017

Uncertainty Lowers Bond Yields

The Federal Reserve expects fewer rate increases

Economic Indicators PENARIS

Canadian inflation has returned to the median target

Canada s Sales Are Disappointing in September

Stronger than forecast inflation in Canada and the United States

The U.S. Economic Outlook

Bank of Canada Still Planning a Key Rate Hike in July

The Federal Reserve Starts Reducing its Balance Sheet

Latino Decisions 2016 Election Eve Poll

NAVIGATING THROUGH THE MIST: INTRODUCING NATIXIS CHINA CAPITAL FLOW TRACKER CHINA HOT TOPICS.

WEEKLY CHANGES AGAINST THE USD MACRO & MARKETS COMMENTARY

KB Home UNDERPERFORM ZACKS CONSENSUS ESTIMATES (KBH-NYSE)

U.S. Economic Update and Outlook. Laurel Graefe, REIN Director Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta October 2, 2013

The weather has hampered the Canadian labor market in April

Transcription:

Focus US# $T ypcap$ $Industr y$ $Categ orie$ $IsWipSource$ $IsWipPending $ $IsWipEmpty$ $compi d$ Page 1/ Focus US N 1-9 US: the economic situation in the swing states Friday August 1 Bruno Cavalier - Chief Economist bcavalier@oddo.fr +33 ()1 1 1 3 Fabien Bossy - Economist fbossy@oddo.fr +33 ()1 1 3 https://www.oddosecurities.com Jobless claims The polls give Hillary Clinton a lead over Donald Trump in the upcoming US presidential elections but nothing decisive 7 days before the vote. To make up his lag, the Republican candidate is honing a protectionist message aimed at the swing states of the north, more industrialised than the national average, and an anti-immigration message for the south which is closer to Mexico. Recently, the economic situation has improved at the national level. We examine in the present note how things stand in the swing states. If the economy is to play a role in this election, it will likely favour the Democrats. The week's focus The presidential campaign is set to accelerate with the first TV debate between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump scheduled for September. The Democratic candidate has a lead of around five points in the national polls, but the election will be determined by the results of a handful of swing states, which are far from certain for either candidate. The US president is elected by an electoral college comprising 3 representatives. Some states have a virtually immutable political colour, 17 for the Democrats (7 electoral college votes) and 3 for the Republicans (191 votes). This leaves approximately ten swing states representing 1 votes. We have categorised them in two groups. The first regroups the Rust Belt states, i.e. manufacturing states faced with deindustrialisation (such as Ohio, Pennsylvania, etc.) in the north. The second, more disparate group, includes southern states (Florida, North Carolina, Virginia), which are probably more sensitive to the immigration issue and where many US retirees are domiciled. Donald Trump's economic programme focuses on criticism of free trade and environmental constraints. One of the targets of his rhetoric is the electorate of the northern swing states as his message implies that these states have been adversely affected by globalisation. However, a closer look at the figures shows that the economic situation of these regions is not as bad as all that. Industrial output has declined, including in recent months, but employment has picked up, admittedly by less than the national average, and the number of jobless claims remains on a downtrend (see table below). One exception is Pennsylvania where unemployment has increased by one point. Whilst industrial activity has been hit by the oil crisis initiated in 1, it is traditionally Republican states especially, such as Texas and Alaska, which have been affected. In the other swing states where growth exceeds the national average, the economic question carries less weight than the immigration issue. In 199, with the US just emerging from a, the economic question took centre stage in the presidential campaign, as succinctly summarised in the slogan "it s the economy, stupid". Will it be the same in 1, even though the situation is completely different as the economy has been in an expansion phase for over seven years, with admittedly a number of jolts? Should this prove to be the case, the beneficiary could, once again be a member of the Clinton family. Unemployment rate Employment change (monthly average) Participation rate Manufacturing employment Mining employment change 3M y/y % change M %pt change M, s change 7Y, s change Y %pt % total % total Total (All states) -3..9 -.1 1 191-1... Democratic states -1.9.1 -. 3 191 -. 7.7. Republican states -3.. -.1 11 19-1. 9.3 1.1 Swing states ("North") * -3..7.3 17 13 -.1 11.9. Swing states ("South")** -1.. -.3 7 3 -...3 * Ohio, Pennsylvania, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iow a. ** Florida, North Carolina, Virginia, Colorado, Nevada Sources: Thomson Reuters, Oddo Securities Conflict of interests: Oddo Securities, a division of Oddo et Cie, limited sharepartnership - Bank authorised by ACPR. Oddo & Cie and/or one of its subsidiaries could be in a conflict of interest situation with one or several of the groups mentioned in this publication. Please refer to the conflict of interests section at the end of this document. Le présent document n'est pas un document contractuel ; il est strictement destiné à l'usage privé du destinataire. Les informations qu'il contient se fondent sur des sources que nous estimons fiables, mais dont nous ne pouvons garantir l'exactitude ni l'exhaustivité. Les opinions exprimées dans le document sont le résultat de notre évaluation à la date de la publication. Elles peuvent donc être révisées à une date ultérieure.

Page / Friday August 1 Home sales were mixed in July. New home sales rose sharply by 1.% over the month to, units, but note that this series is volatile and subject to major revisions. Existing home sales were down 3.% to.39 million. In this segment, sales were restricted by the lower level of existing home inventories. This should continue to push prices up and prompt home-builders to accelerate the production of new units. Durable goods orders rebounded by.% in July, with the core component (capital goods excluding defence and aircraft) gaining 1.%. The series is too erratic to establish any definitive signal but note that the three-month variation is now close to equilibrium for the first time since the beginning of 1. If this trend is confirmed, a rebound in business investment could be observed in Q3. That said, after several quarters of contraction the year-on-year change in industrial orders remains fairly negative. After disappointing GDP growth in Q (1.% q-o-q on an annualised basis), the nowcasts issued by three regional Feds show a clear rebound in Q3. The New York Fed puts growth at 3.%, with the St. Louis Fed at 3.% and the Atlanta Fed (GDPnow) at 3.%. This rebound should partly stem from a positive contribution from investment in the oil sector but also, and above all, from a positive contribution from inventories, which had wiped 1. points off growth in Q. Monetary and fiscal policy In a speech on 1 August, the vice-chairman of the Fed, Stanley Fischer, gave a fairly positive description of the US economy, which he deems close to the Fed s targets on employment and inflation. Granted, Mr Fischer did not omit to mention the problems associated with low productivity over recent years but refused to conclude that there is no way out of the current situation. He also gave no indication regarding his vote at the next meeting on 1 September, but we understand that he would not find the notion of a fresh hike in the Fed funds' rate completely absurd. The week ahead After causing significant disappointment in May, the monthly labour market report improved considerably in June and July, with an increase of, respectively, 9, and, jobs. The unemployment rate is.9%, a level that the Fed deems to represent long-term equilibrium. The August report is due out on September. With jobless claims remaining at a low level,, for the reference week, the result should be satisfactory once again notwithstanding a slightly higher level of volatility in August. The consensus forecasts a return to recent trends (1, jobs created per month over the first half of the year). Lately, the unemployment rate has shown no clear trends, espousing movements in the participation rate (both going up or down simultaneously). Employment conditions clearly remain central to the Fed, but now that full employment has been restored inflation seems to have a greater influence on the decision whether or not to raise rates. Even though the correlation with the ISM is imperfect due to strong volatility, the regional manufacturing surveys that have already been published for August (New York, Philadelphia, Richmond) issue a fairly negative signal for the next ISM manufacturing survey which is due out on 1 September. In particular, the new orders component fell back sharply. At the same time, the PMI manufacturing was slightly down from.9 to.1 points (the ISM stood at. points last month).

Page 3/ Friday August 1 Appendix 1 - Labour market thousands US initial jobless claims w moving average 7 3 3 thousands US payrolls change per month (3mma) - - - - % labor force US unemployment rate 1 9 % US hours worked (y/y) 3m/3m annualised 7 Fed's long-term equilibrium rate band - - - - Appendix - Consumer US consumer confort (Bloomberg ) 19-1 average 3 % US retail sales ex-auto (y/y) 3m/3m annualised 1 1 - - - - -1 % disp.income US savings rate millions US car sales (annual rate) 1 before tax increase 1 1 1 1 1 Sources : Thomson Reuters, Bloomberg, Oddo Securities

Page / Friday August 1 Appendix 3 - Business climate points ISM manufacturing ISM non-manufacturing 3 points ISM manufacturing new orders ISM non-manuf. new orders 7 3 3 points 7 US homebuilders confidence (NAHB ) % ECRI leading indicator (y/y) 3 3 19-1 average 1-1 average level 1 - -3 Appendix - Conditions of economic activity. 1. avg. expansion level. -1. -. -3. US business conditions (ADS ) % q/q annual. US real GDP US "GDPplus".... -. -. -. -. -. % US core capital goods shipments (y/y) 3m/3m annualised 1 1 - -1-1 - - millions US housings starts building permits 1. 1. 1. 1. 1.... Sources : Thomson Reuters, Bloomberg, Oddo Securities

Page / Friday August 1 Appendix - Inflation and monetary policy % US yy breakeven inflation 3. 3... 1. -1 average 1. % Fed funds rate 3M rate future in one year.... 3. 3... 1. 1... % US PCE deflator (y/y) 3m/3m annualised 3 1-1 - -3 Fed's target bn$ Fed holdings of Tresuries Fed holdings of RMBS 3 1 1 Appendix - Financial markets % US Treasury 1 yield... 3.. spread with US corporate BAA bond yield (bp, rhs) 1. 3 1 Z-score financial stress (Chicago Fed ) (Cleveland Fed ) 3 1-1 - -3 S&P 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 9 7 US dollar effective exchange rate (DXY ) -1 average 7 Sources : Thomson Reuters, Bloomberg, Oddo Securities

Page / Friday August 1 Disclaimer: Disclaimer for Distribution by Oddo & Cie to Non-United States Investors: This research publication is produced by Oddo Securities ( Oddo Securities ), a division of Oddo & Cie ( ODDO ), which is licensed by the Autorité de Contrôle Prudentiel et de Résolution (ACPR) and regulated by the Autorité des Marchés Financiers ( AMF ), and/or by ODDO SEYDLER BANK AG ( Oddo Seydler ), a German subsidiary of ODDO, regulated by Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht ( BaFin ). The research, when distributed outside of the U.S., is intended exclusively for non-u.s. customers of ODDO and cannot be divulged to a third-party without prior written consent of ODDO. This document is not and should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to purchase or subscribe for any investment. This research has been prepared in accordance with regulatory provisions designed to promote the independence of investment research. Chinese walls (information barriers) have been implemented to avert the unauthorized dissemination of confidential information and to prevent and manage situations of conflict of interest. This research has been prepared in accordance with French and German regulatory provisions designed to promote the independence of investment research. The recommendation presented into this document is reviewed and updated at least following each Quarterly Report published by the issuer purpose of this Research Report. At the time of publication of this document, ODDO and/or Oddo Seydler, and/or one of its subsidiaries may have a conflict of interest with the issuer(s) mentioned. While all reasonable effort has been made to ensure that the information contained is not untrue or misleading at the time of publication, no representation is made as to its accuracy or completeness and it should not be relied upon as such. Past performances offer no guarantee as to future performances. All opinions expressed in the present document reflect the current context and which is subject to change without notice. The views expressed in this research report accurately reflect the analyst s personal views about the subject securities and/or issuers and no part of his compensation was, is, or will be directly or indirectly related to the specific views contained in the research report. This research report does not constitute a personal recommendation or take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situations, or needs of individual clients. Clients should consider whether any advice or recommendation in this research is suitable for their particular circumstances and, if appropriate, seek professional advice, including tax advice. Disclaimer for Distribution by Oddo New York to United States Investors: This research publication is produced by Oddo Securities, a division of ODDO and/or by Oddo Seydler. This research is distributed to U.S. investors exclusively by Oddo New York Corporation ( ONY ), MEMBER: FINRA/SIPC, and is intended exclusively for U.S. customers of ONY and cannot be divulged to a third-party without prior written consent of ONY. This document is not and should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to purchase or subscribe for any investment. This research has been prepared in accordance with regulatory provisions designed to promote the independence of investment research. Chinese walls (information barriers) have been implemented to avert the unauthorized dissemination of confidential information and to prevent and manage situations of conflict of interest. This research has been prepared in accordance with French and German regulatory provisions designed to promote the independence of investment research. At the time of publication of this document, ODDO and/or Oddo Seydler, and/or one of its subsidiaries may have a conflict of interest with the issuer(s) mentioned. While all reasonable effort has been made to ensure that the information contained is not untrue or misleading at the time of publication, no representation is made as to its accuracy or completeness and it should not be relied upon as such. Past performances offer no guarantee as to future performances. All opinions expressed in the present document reflect the current context and which is subject to change without notice. Rule 1a- Disclosure: Under Rule 1a-(a)(3), any transactions conducted by ODDO and/or Oddo Seydler, and/or one of its subsidiaries with U.S. persons in the securities described in this foreign research must be effected through ONY. As a member of FINRA, ONY has reviewed this material for distribution to U.S. persons as required by FINRA Rules 1(h) applicable to dissemination of research produced by its affiliate ODDO. FINRA Disclosures: Neither ONY, ODDO, nor Oddo Securities, nor Oddo Seydler beneficially owns 1% or more of any class of common equity securities of the subject company. The research analyst of Oddo Securities or Oddo Seydler, at the time of publication of this research report, is not aware, nor does he know or have reason to know of any actual, material conflict of interest of himself, ODDO, Oddo Securities, Oddo Seydler or ONY, except those mentioned in the paragraph entitled Risk of Conflict of Interest. Oddo Securities or ODDO or Oddo Seydler may receive or seek compensation for investment banking services in the next 3 months from the subject company of this research report, but ONY would not participate in those arrangements. Neither ONY, ODDO, Oddo Securities, nor Oddo Seydler has received compensation from the subject company in the past 1 months for providing investment banking services except those mentioned in the paragraph of Risk of Conflict of Interest. Neither ONY., ODDO, Oddo Securities nor Oddo Seydler has managed or co-managed a public offering of securities for the subject company in the past 1 months except those mentioned in the paragraph of Risk of Conflict of Interest. ONY does not make (and never has made) markets and, accordingly, was not making a market in the subject company's securities at the time that this research report was published. Regulation AC: ONY is exempt from the certification requirements of Regulation AC for its distribution to a U.S. person in the United States of this research report that is prepared by an Oddo Securities research analyst because ODDO has no officers or persons performing similar functions or employees in common with ONY and ONY maintains and enforces written policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent it, any controlling persons, officers or persons performing similar functions, and employees of ONY from influencing the activities of the third party research analyst and the content of research reports prepared by the third party research analyst. Contact Information of firm distributing research to U.S. investors: Oddo New York Corporation, MEMBER: FINRA/SIPC, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Oddo & Cie; Philippe Bouclainville, President (pbouclainville@oddony.com) 1 East nd Street New York, NY 1 1-1-. Statement of conflict of interests of all companies mentioned in this document may be consulted on Oddo & Cie s.