EUROPEAN COMMISSION. The Commission has based its decision on the following considerations:

Similar documents
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. (3) Welsh Government Rural Communities - Rural development programme Rural Community Development Fund.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. SA (2017/N) Saxony: Aid for the closing of milk production capacity

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. The Commission has based its decision on the following considerations:

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. State aid / Germany (Bavaria) SA (2017/N) Bavarian mountain farmers scheme (BBP) 2017

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. State Aid - Netherlands SA (2018/N) NL_LNV_AGRO Energy-efficiency glasshouse horticulture

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. The Commission has based its Decision on the following considerations:

Embargo VISTA illimité(*)

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. SA (2018/N) Aid for restoring forestry potential after storm damage

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. State aid/czech Republic SA (2017/N) Framework program for risk and crisis management in agriculture

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. State aid / Netherlands SA (2016/N) Subsidy Regulation Nature and Landscape management (SVNL)

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. State aid SA (N/2014) Germany - Subordinated loans for SMEs Saxony

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. SA (2017/NN) Rheinland-Pfalz Implementation of the law on sales promotion of wine

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. The Commission has based its decision on the following considerations:

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. The Commission has based its decision on the following considerations:

State Aid / Germany (Sachsen-Anhalt) - Aid No SA (2014/N) - Compensation for losses caused by floods 2013 (losses in the agricultural sector)

State aid N 668/2008 Germany Federal Framework "Small amounts of compatible aid"

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. State aid SA (2014/NN) Germany Alleged State aid to medical centre in Durmersheim

Aid No NN 67/2007 Stamp duty relief for farm consolidation

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. State aid / Netherlands SA (2016/NN) Model regulation - Grant Scheme nature and landscape management

Subject: N 117/2007, - Germany Decontamination of the site "Neue Maxhütte Stahlwerke GmbH" by "57 Profi-Start GmbH 2003"

PART III. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SHEETS. Part III.4 a Provisional Supplementary Information Sheet on regional investment aid schemes

Official Journal of the European Union. (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Brussels, C(2015) 2820 final. State Aid SA (2014/NN) Germany Sea Port extension Wismar.

State aid N 426/2009 Germany Federal Framework for low interest loans for the production of green products

PE-CONS 3619/3/01 REV 3

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. State Aid SA Austria Restructuring aid scheme "TOP-Tourismus-Förderung, Teil D"

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. State Aid/Hungary SA (2016/N) Temporary aid granted in the frame of the Agricultural Széchenyi Card Loan Programme

(2) Quality Label Baden-Württemberg Bio Label Baden-Württemberg Baden-Württemberg: EU quality regulations for agricultural products and foodstuffs

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) / of XXX

State aid N 27/2009 Germany Guarantee scheme under the Temporary Framework ("Befristete Regelungen Bürgschaften")

Official Journal of the European Union. (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. (1) On 7 October 2016, Germany notified public support for an infrastructure project in the port of Magdeburg.

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 108(4) thereof,

Council of the European Union Brussels, 4 May 2017 (OR. en) Mr Jeppe TRANHOLM-MIKKELSEN, Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union

State aid SA (2011/N) Greece Aid in favour of the gas supply companies in Anatoliki Makedonia Thraki, Kentriki Makedonia and Sterea Ellada

Embargo VISTA illimité (*)

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. The Commission has based its decision on the following considerations:

Official Journal of the European Union

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. State aid No. N 303/2008 Creating value-added agricultural products Latvia

1 st call for proposals, 2 nd call for proposals, 3 rd call for proposals, Priority 3 Better network of harbours version

1. PROCEDURE 2. DESCRIPTION EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Brussels, C(2008)9026 endgültig

11080/13 HKE/DOS/vm DGG 3B

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. SA (2014/NN ex 2011/CP) Germany - Städtische Projektgesellschaft "Wirtschaftsbüro Gaarden - Kiel"

Embargo VISTA illimité(*)

Aid No SA (2014/N) Production and pro mille levy funds in agriculture

[ ALTERNATIVE

REGIONAL STATE AID. Article 107 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), in particular 107(3) (a) and (c) thereof.

SCOTTISH ENTERPRISE REGIONAL AIRPORTS, MARITIME PORTS AND INLAND PORTS AID SCHEME

Transparency Interpretation of the notion of individual aid award

Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION

State aid C7/2010 (ex NN5/2010) Scheme on the fiscal carry-forward of losses ("Sanierungsklausel")

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Brussels, C(2013) 4775 final

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. State aid No. N 166/2007 Regional aid Corporate Income Tax Act (Article 184) Bulgaria

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. State aid SA (2015/N) Greece Prolongation of the Greek financial support measures (Art.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. (2) The initial aid scheme was first approved by the Commission in 2012 for the period ("the 2012 Decision") 1.

Embargo VISTA illimité(*)

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Background and objectives of the notified project

Official Journal of the European Union L 347/185

DISCLAIMER COMPLIANCE CHECK (OK?)

Paper of the services of DG Competition containing draft guidelines on regional State aid for (Text with EEA relevance)

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. State aid / Denmark SA (2015/FC) Complaint concerning alleged unlawful State aid through the sale of the Lurpak trademarks

PART III. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SHEETS. Part III.4 b Provisional Supplementary Information Sheet on individual regional investment aid

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Brussels, C(2011)

EU financing for biodiversity and nature: German experiences show need of fundamental changes Christa Ratte

DECISIONS Official Journal of the European Union L 7/3

Official Journal of the European Union

C. ENABLING REGULATION AND GENERAL BLOCK EXEMPTION REGULATION

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. State Aid SA (2013/N) Portuguese Guarantee Scheme on EIB lending

2004R0794 EN

GUIDANCE FICHE PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK REVIEW AND RESERVE IN VERSION 1 9 APRIL 2013 RELEVANT PROVISIONS IN THE DRAFT LEGISLATION

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMISSION STAFF PAPER PRELIMINARY DRAFT. Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION

(Information) INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES EUROPEAN COMMISSION

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION

Official Journal of the European Union. Guidelines for the examination of State aid to fisheries and aquaculture (2008/C 84/06)

FISHERIES MEASURES FOR MARINE NATURA 2000 SITES A consistent approach to requests for fisheries management measures under the Common Fisheries Policy

PUBLIC. Brussels, 28 October 2002 COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION 13545/02 LIMITE FISC 271

ELIGIBILITY RULES. Rule No 1: Expenditure Actually Paid Out

State aid N 47 a/2009 Austria Limited amounts of compatible aid under the Temporary Framework ("Österreichregelung Kleinbeihilfen")

The Commission wishes to inform Germany that it has decided not to raise objections against a capital injection for Hypo Real Estate as rescue aid.

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION

Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development. of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development

FINANCIAL CONTROL OF FUNDS CO-FINANCED FROM THE EU BUDGET: POSSIBILITIES OF CONSIDERING NEW AND MORE FAVORABLE LEGAL PROVISIONS

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. State aid No SA (2015/NN) Hungary Hungarian health contribution of tobacco industry businesses

DRAFT REVISED GUIDANCE NOTE ON MAJOR PROJECTS IN THE PROGRAMMING PERIOD : THRESHOLD AND CONTENTS OF COMMISSION DECISIONS

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. State aid SA Romania Prolongation of scheme "Regional development by direct investment" (N 103/2008)

Draft Communication from the Commission. A new framework for the assessment of State aid which has limited effects on intra-community trade

(NORWAY) HAVING REGARD TO the Agreement on the European Economic Area 1, in particular to Articles 61 to 63 thereof,

Official Journal of the European Union L 358/3

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

Embargo VISTA illimité(*)

SI Natura2000 Management - Natura 2000 Management programme for Slovenia for the period LIFE11 NAT/SI/000880

State aid N 522/2009 Austria Prolongation of State aid N 75/2007 Guarantee scheme for the restructuring of SMEs in Austria

Managing compliance of ESI Funds with State aid rules

SEA&RDP. SEA and rural development programmes. Yvette IZABEL DG environment- Unit A3: Cohesion Policy and Environmental assessments

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Brussels, C(2016) 4506 final. State Aid SA Germany Investment for the Port of Wyk auf Föhr. Sir, 1.

Guidelines on state aid: the basics

(Information) EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Guidelines on regional State aid for (Text with EEA relevance) (2013/C 209/01) INTRODUCTION

Guidance for Member States on Performance framework, review and reserve

An overview of the eligibility rules in the programming period

The main objectives of the eu rural development policy for

Transcription:

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 1.2.2017 C(2017) 693 final Subject: State aid Germany SA.43902 (2016/N-2) Saxony Natural heritage: nature protection related public relation and education activities Sir, The European Commission ("the Commission") wishes to inform Germany that, having examined the information supplied by your authorities on the State aid scheme referred to above, it has decided not to raise any objections to the relevant scheme as it is compatible with the internal market pursuant to Article 107(3)(c) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU"). The Commission has based its decision on the following considerations: 1. PROCEDURE (1) By letter of 15 December 2015, registered by the Commission on the same day, Germany pre-notified the above mentioned aid scheme. The Commission sent a request for additional information to the German authorities on 8 February 2016 which the German authorities answered by letter of 1 March 2016, registered by the Commission on the same day. (2) By letter of 19 October 2016, registered by the Commission on the same day, Germany notified, according to Article 108(3) TFEU, the above mentioned aid scheme. The Commission sent a request for additional information to the German authorities on 23 November 2016 which the German authorities answered by letter of 19 December 2016, registered by the Commission on the same day. Seiner Exzellenz Herrn Frank-Walter STEINMEIER Bundesminister des Auswärtigen Werderscher Markt 1D 11017 Berlin DEUTSCHLAND Commission européenne/europese Commissie, 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel, BELGIQUE/BELGIË

2. DESCRIPTION 2.1. Title (3) Saxony Natural heritage: nature protection related public relation and education activities 2.2. Objective (4) The purpose of the aid scheme is to support, based on the Rural Development Programme (RDP) of the Free State of Saxony for the programming period 2014-2020, the sustainable protection of natural biodiversity and the natural rural heritage including the conservation of historical diversity of the cultural landscape. The focal points of the support are the habitats and the species under Directive 92/43/EEC 1 and Directive 2009/147/EC 2 and other protected and vulnerable habitats and species in Saxony. 2.3. Legal basis (5) The legal basis is the Directive of the Saxon State Ministry of the Environment and Agriculture on support for measures to protect natural biodiversity and the natural rural heritage in Saxony. 2.4. Duration (6) From the date of approval by the Commission until 31 December 2020. 2.5. Budget (7) Overall budget is 4,5 Mio Euro/annual budget is 900 000 Euro. 2.6. Beneficiaries (8) Beneficiaries are undertakings who are natural persons or legal persons governed by private or public law (such as for example service providers, nature protection organisations, education facilities, museums, visitor's centres and others). Both, large enterprises and small and medium-sized enterprises, can be beneficiaries under the present notified aid scheme. (9) The aid will not be granted to undertakings: a) in difficulty within the meaning of point (35)(15) of the European Union Guidelines for State aid in the agricultural and forestry sectors and in rural areas 2014 to 2020 3 (hereinafter "the Guidelines"); b) subject to an outstanding recovery order following a previous Commission decision declaring an aid illegal and incompatible with the internal market. 1 Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora, OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p. 7 2 Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds, OJ L 20, 26.1.2010, p. 7 3 OJ C 204 of 1.7.2014, p. 1, amended by the Notice published in OJ C 390, 24.11.2015, p. 4, and by the Corrigendum published in OJ C 265, 21.7.2016, p. 5. 2

2.7. Description of the aid scheme (10) The RDP of Saxony 2014-2020 includes EAFRD co-financed measures devoted to nature protection related public relation and education activities and projects under its Chapter 8.2.3 and LEADER. The current notified aid scheme covers nature protection related public relation and education activities and projects under those co-financed measures. (11) The following activities and projects are supported under the present notified aid scheme: awareness raising and education activities related to nature conservation projects, in particular preparation and publication of brochures, leaflets, books, organisation of information events and trainings, establishment and maintenance of offices to provide information to the public (especially about species and projects that involve potential conflict between stakeholders and parties), exhibitions, explanations about products derived from ecological production methods, educational and information projects for visitors and tourists in protected areas, as well as conflict management, animation and follow-up of communication processes related to maintaining biodiversity. (12) The eligible activities and projects must relate to formally recognised natural heritage as follows: habitats recognised under Directive 92/43/EEC and Directive 2009/147/EC (categorised in 1, 2 and 3 categories); biotypes recognised under the Biotopes Red List of the Free State of Saxony as category "R" (extreme rare) or category "V" (warning list). (13) The aid is granted in form of direct grant. (14) The eligible costs are the following costs directly linked to the supported activities and projects referred to in recital 11: personnel and office costs, costs for planning, management and project implementation; investments in tangible and intangible assets like acquisition or rent of land, buildings, equipment and machinery. However, VAT is not eligible except where it is not recoverable under national VAT legislation. 3

(15) The personnel and office costs are based on standard unit costs that are established by the Saxony Office for Environment, Agriculture and Geology (Sächsische Landesamt für Umwelt, Landwirtschaft und Geologie) and verified by isw Institut für Strukturpolitik und Wirtschaftsförderung ggmbh. The standard unit costs are approved as part of the RDP of Saxony 2014-2020 and the ex-ante evaluation is annexed to the program. (16) In case of acquisition of land the eligible costs of such acquisition are limited to 10% of the total eligible costs. (17) The potential beneficiaries have to submit an application before the start of the activity or the project. The application includes data on the applicant and the size of the undertaking, a description of the activity/project, including its location and start and end dates, the amount of aid needed to carry it out and the eligible costs. The official template has to be used. (18) Applicants who are large enterprises shall submit in addition a counterfactual scenario. The description of the counterfactual scenario has to be supported by documentary evidence. The granting authority will perform credibility check of the counterfactual scenario and confirm the presence of the incentive effect. The counterfactual scenario is plausible, in so far as the factors are described that were relevant for the beneficiary regarding the concrete project. (19) The aid for investments granted to large enterprises amounts to the net extra costs for the implementation of the investment, compared to the counterfactual in the absence of aid. The aid shall in that case cover only the minimum necessary to render the project sufficiently profitable. The maximum level of support shall be calculated on the basis of the minimum necessary to render the project sufficiently profitable and the maximum aid intensities. (20) The investment projects must correspond to the local development strategies or to the development plans of the municipalities and the villages concerned. (21) The aid intensity is limited to the following: projects and activities in biotypes recognised under the Biotopes Red List of the Free State of Saxony up to 80% of the eligible costs; projects and activities in category 3 biotypes recognised under Directive 92/43/EEC and Directive 2009/147/EC up to 90% of the eligible costs; projects and activities in categories 1 and 2 biotypes recognised under Directive 92/43/EEC and Directive 2009/147/EC up to 100% of the eligible costs; LEADER projects and activities - up to 80% of the eligible costs; projects and activities carried out by municipalities and communal entities up to 90% of the eligible costs. (22) The net revenues will be deducted from the eligible costs. The deduction follows the rules established in Article 61 of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 4. The beneficiary has 4 Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the 4

to describe in the aid application which operations would lead to revenues. In case of revenues during the implementation of the aided activities and projects those revenues are deducted from the eligible costs. This condition is included in the aid granting act. The final off-set is done with the final payment's application. In case of revenues after the completion of the aided activities and projects the principle is that all revenues identifiable in advance will be deducted from the eligible costs ex ante. Where this is not possible the granting act will include a clause that obliges the beneficiary to present report about all incomes and expenses for the three-year period after the completion of the aided activity and project and following this to pay back the amount exceeding the eligible costs reduced by the revenues. (23) The potential negative effects of the aid on competition and trade are overcome by its positive effects on the rural development in Saxony for the following reasons: The aid is operated in the framework of the RDP of Saxony 2014-2020 which targets the cross sectorial rural development. There will be no single benefit for one sector but economic operators active in different sub-sectors will benefit which do not stay in direct competition like for example service providers (engineering offices, landscape offices), nature protection organisations, education facilities, museums, visitors' centres. Moreover, the aid is primarily devoted to nature protection related public relation and education activities the investment component of which is very narrow. In addition, the overall budget for the whole period of implementation is rather low (4.5 mio EUR) and it is expected that about 70 projects will be supported. (24) The project and the activities financed under the current notified scheme shall not receive any other public support. (25) The granting authority is the Saxony Office for Environment, Agriculture and Geology (das Sächsische Landesamt für Umwelt, Landwirtschaft und Geologie). (26) The aid scheme and the individual aid grants above 60 000 EUR/ 500 000 EUR will be published on the following web page: https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/competition/transparency/public/search/home/. 3. ASSESSMENT 3.1. Existence of aid - Application of Article 107(1) TFEU (27) According to Article 107(1) of the TFEU, "[s]ave as otherwise provided in the Treaties, any aid granted by a Member State or through State resources in any form whatsoever which distorts or threatens to distort competition by favouring certain undertakings or the production of certain goods shall, in so far as it affects trade between Member States, be incompatible with the internal market". (28) The qualification of a measure as aid within the meaning of this provision therefore requires the following cumulative conditions to be met: (i) the measure must be imputable to the State and financed through State resources; (ii) it must confer an Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006, OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 320. 5

advantage on its recipient; (iii) that advantage must be selective; and (iv) the measure must distort or threaten to distort competition and affect trade between Member States. (29) The scheme in question confers an advantage on its recipients. This advantage is granted through State resources, namely EAFRD and national co-financing (see recital 10) and it favours the undertakings active in the rural economy (see recital 8). According to the case law of the Court of Justice, the mere fact that the competitive position of an undertaking is strengthened compared to other competing undertakings, by giving it an economic benefit which it would not otherwise have received in the normal course of its business, points to a possible distortion of competition. 5 (30) Pursuant to the case law of the Court of Justice, aid to an undertaking appears to affect trade between Member States where that undertaking operates in a market open to intra- EU trade. 6 The beneficiaries of aid operate on the market of provision of services like nature protection related public relation and education activities in the rural areas, where intra-eu trade takes place. 7. The sector concerned is open to competition at EU level and therefore sensitive to any measure in favour of the production in one or more Member States. Therefore, the present scheme is liable to distort competition and to affect trade between Member States. (31) In light of the above, the conditions of Article 107(1) of the TFEU are fulfilled. It can therefore be concluded that the proposed scheme constitutes State aid within the meaning of that Article. The aid may only be considered compatible with the internal market if it can benefit from one of the derogations provided for in the TFEU. 3.2. Lawfulness of the aid Application of Article 108(3) TFEU (32) The aid scheme was notified to the Commission on 19 October 2016. It has not been implemented yet. Therefore, Germany has complied with its obligation under Article 108(3) TFEU. 3.3. Compatibility of the aid 3.3.1. Application of Article 107(3)(c) TFEU (33) Under Article 107(3)(c) TFEU, an aid may be considered compatible with the internal market, if it is found to facilitate the development of certain economic activities or of certain economic areas, where such aid does not adversely affect trading conditions to an extent contrary to the common interest. (34) For this derogation to be applicable, the aid must comply with the relevant Union State aid rules. 5 Judgment of the Court of 17 September 1980 in Case 730/79 Philip Morris Holland BV v Commission of the European Communities, ECLI:EU:C:1980:209. 6 See in particular the judgment of the Court of 13 July 1988 in Case 102/87 French Republic v Commission of the European Communities, ECLI:EU:C:1988:391. 7 In 2011 the service sector accounted for 64.6% of GVA in the predominantly rural regions (GVA is defined as the value of output less the value of intermediate consumption. Output is valued at basic prices, GVA is valued at basic prices and intermediate consumption is valued at purchasers prices), Source: "CAP context indicators 2014-2020: Structure of the economy", DG Agriculture and Rural Development. 6

3.3.2. Application of the European Union Guidelines for State aid in the agricultural and forestry sectors and in rural areas 2014 to 2020 (35) As regards the notified aid scheme, Part II, Chapter 3.2. Aid for basic services and village renewal in rural areas of the Guidelines is applicable. Thus, the Commission will examine below whether the notified scheme complies with the common assessment principles as well as the specific conditions in Part II, Chapter 3.2 of the Guidelines. 3.3.2.1. Common Assessment Principles Contribution to a common objective (36) Pursuant to point (46) of the Guidelines the Commission considers that measures, implemented pursuant to and in conformity with Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 8 in the framework of a rural development programme, are per se consistent with and contribute to the objectives of rural development. The notified aid scheme is part of the RDP of Saxony for the period 2014-2020 (see recital 10) and therefore the requirement for contribution to a common objective is complied with. Need for State intervention (37) Since the present scheme fulfils the specific conditions laid down in the relevant sections of Part II of the Guidelines, as analysed below under section 3.3.2.2, the Commission considers, in line with point (55) of the Guidelines, that the aid is necessary to address the objective of common interest. Appropriateness of aid (38) According to point (57) of the Guidelines the Commission considers that aid granted in the rural areas which fulfils the specific conditions laid down in the relevant Sections of Part II of these Guidelines is an appropriate policy instrument. The current aid scheme fulfils the specific conditions laid down in Chapter 3.2 of Part II of the Guidelines, as shown below under section 3.3.2.2. (39) According to point (61) of the Guidelines the Commission further considers as regards rural development measures, co-financed by EAFRD that aid granted in the form provided for in the respective rural development measure is an appropriate aid instrument. The aid under the current scheme is granted in a form of direct grant, the same as the form of support provided under the RDP of Saxony for the period 2014-2020. (40) Therefore, the principle of appropriateness of the aid is complied with. Incentive effect and need for aid (41) The aid will be granted only for activities and projects that start after the submission of the application form (see recital 17). (42) The application form contains the data required under point (71) of the Guidelines (see recital 17). 8 Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005, OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 487. 7

(43) Large enterprises are required to submit counterfactual scenario and documentary evidence which will be verified by the granting authority, in compliance with points (72) and (73) of the Guidelines (see recital 18). (44) Therefore, the incentive effect requirements of the Guidelines are complied with. Proportionality of the aid (45) The notified aid scheme respects the eligible costs and the aid intensities as provided for in Chapter 3.2 of Part II of the Guidelines (see recitals 55-57 below). VAT is not eligible, except where it is not recoverable under national VAT legislation (see recital 14). (46) As regards cumulation, any other public support for projects and activities under the current notified scheme is excluded (see recital 24). (47) As regards aid to large undertakings the aid will correspond to the net extra costs for the implementation of the investment, compared to the counterfactual in the absence of aid (see recital 19). (48) Therefore, the principle of proportionality of aid is complied with. Avoidance of undue negative effects on competition and trade (49) The German authorities demonstrated that the negative effects will be limited taking into account the cumulative aid amount, the expected beneficiaries and the characteristics of the targeted sectors (see recital 23). Based on this the Commission concludes that the negative effects are overweighed by the positive effects in terms of contribution to the objectives of the rural development policy in Saxony. Transparency (50) The transparency requirement is complied with as shown in recital 26. 3.3.2.2. Specific assessment according to the category of aid (Part II, Chapter 3.2. of the Guidelines) (51) According to point (631) of the Guidelines, the aid must be granted in the framework of a rural development programme either as aid co-financed by the EAFRD or as additional national financing to such aid. The notified scheme forms part of the RDP of Saxony for the period 2014-2020 and is co-financed by the EAFRD (see recital 10). Therefore, point (631) of the Guidelines is complied with. (52) The aid covers investments and environmental awareness actions associated with rural landscapes and high nature value sites. The aid activities fall under point (644)(e) of the Guidelines. (53) According to point (645) of the Guidelines investments under this aid scheme are eligible where the relevant operations are implemented in accordance with plans for the development of municipalities and villages in rural areas and their basic services, where such plans exist and must be consistent with any relevant local development strategy. The German authorities demonstrated that the investments under the notified scheme have to be implemented in accordance with the local development strategies or the 8

development plans of the municipalities and the villages concerned (see recital 20). Therefore, the condition of point (645) of the Guidelines is fulfilled. (54) According to point (646) of the Guidelines the aid should be granted for heritage which is formally recognised as cultural or natural heritage. The notified aid scheme covers actions and investments in habitats and biotopes that are recognised as natural heritage (see recital 12). Therefore the condition of point (646) of the Guidelines is fulfilled. (55) The eligible costs under the notified aid scheme cover investment costs for tangible and intangible assets and costs linked to environmental awareness actions (see recital 14). Therefore the conditions of point (647) of the Guidelines are fulfilled. (56) Furthermore, as regards the investment costs for tangible and intangible assets point (635) of the Guidelines applies. The aid towards land acquisition complies with the 10% limit (see recital 16). (57) As regards the aid intensity point (649) of the Guidelines provides for that it must not exceed 100 % of the eligible costs and that the net revenues must be deducted from the eligible costs ex ante or through a clawback mechanism. The aid intensities under the notified aid scheme vary between 80 % and 100 % (see recital 21). As regards the deduction of the net revenues the German authorities explained that such deduction mechanism is foreseen based on Article 61 of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 either during the implementation of the aided activities or projects or after their completion in three-year period (see recital 22). Therefore, the conditions of point (649) of the Guidelines are fulfilled. 3.3.2.3. Other general conditions (58) The legal basis excludes from the scope of the beneficiaries undertakings in difficulty within the meaning of point (35)(15) of the Guidelines and undertakings which are subject to an outstanding recovery order following a previous Commission decision declaring an aid illegal and incompatible with the internal market (recital 9). Therefore, the conditions of points (26) and (27) of the Guidelines are fulfilled. 4. CONCLUSION The Commission has accordingly decided not to raise objections to the notified aid scheme on the grounds that it is compatible with the internal market pursuant to Article 107(3)(c) TFEU. If any parts of this letter are covered by the obligation of professional secrecy according to the Commission communication on professional secrecy in State aid decisions 9 and should not be published, please inform the Commission within fifteen working days of notification of this letter. If the Commission does not receive a reasoned request by that deadline Germany will be deemed to agree to the publication of the full text of this letter. If Germany wishes certain information to be covered by the obligation of professional secrecy please indicate the parts and provide a justification in respect of each part for which non-disclosure is requested. 9 Commission communication C(2003) 4582 of 1 December 2003 on professional secrecy in State aid decisions, OJ C 297, 9.12.2003, p. 6. 9

Your request should be sent electronically via the secured e-mail system Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) in accordance with Article 3(3) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 10, to the following address: agri-state-aids-notifications@ec.europa.eu. For the Commission Phil HOGAN Member of the Commission 10 Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 implementing Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1). 10