Appendix C Application of the Entity-Level Requirements to Swap Dealers and MSPs*

Similar documents
ADVISORY Dodd-Frank Act

Direct and Significant Connections: CFTC Provides Guidance on Extraterritoriality

U.S. Response: Jurisdictions Authority and Process for Exercising Deference in Relation to OTC Derivatives Regulation

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION. Amended Order Designating the Provider of Legal Entity Identifiers to be Used in

Introduction to the U.S. Regulation of Cross-Border Transactions Involving Swaps and Security-Based Swaps

EDF TRADING A leader in the international wholesale energy market. 27 February 2012

US OTC derivatives reforms Impact on UK and other non-us asset managers. Second update October 2013

Client Alert. CFTC Issues Proposals on the Extraterritorial Application of US Swaps Regulations. Overview

Dodd-Frank Title VII: Three Years Out, Still Buyer Beware

Clearing Exemption for Inter-Affiliate Swaps

CFTC and SEC Issue Final Swap-Related Rules Under Title VII of Dodd-Frank

CLIENT UPDATE FINAL CFTC RULES ON CLEARING EXEMPTION FOR SWAPS BETWEEN CERTAIN AFFILIATED ENTITIES

CLIENT UPDATE THREE NO-ACTION LETTERS ON SWAP REPORTING OBLIGATIONS

Comparison of the Dodd Frank Act Title VII and the European Market Infrastructure Regulation

OTC Derivatives US/EU comparison EIFR, 18 December 2013

Clearing Requirement Determination Under Section 2(h) of the CEA RIN Number 3038 AD86

July 16, Key Takeaways: Contents

Dodd-Frank Act OTC Derivatives Reform

Comment on TW SEF LLC Self-Certification for Swaps Made Available to Trade

April 24, Re: Interim Final Rule on Swap Data Repositories - Access to SDR Data by Market Participants (RIN 3038-AE14)

Dodd Frank Swaps Regulation. David Lucking: Partner, New York

International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc.

Dodd-Frank Title VII Update: Where Are We Today and Where Are We Going? Ten Important Issues Facing Derivatives Users

MAJOR NEW DERIVATIVES REGULATION THE SCIENCE OF COMPLIANCE

February 22, RIN 3038 AD20 -- Swap Data Repositories. Dear Mr. Stawick:

CFTC ISSUES MULTIPLE NO-ACTION LETTERS ON REPORTING AND BUSINESS CONDUCT RULES. Portfolio reconciliation; Swap trading relationship documentation;

Dodd Frank and inter affiliate trading of derivatives

End-User Guide to CFTC Implementation of Dodd-Frank Act

ADVISORY Dodd-Frank Act

ADVISORY Dodd-Frank Act

Hard Brexit: An Impact Assessment for US Market Participants and Entities Registered with the CFTC 1 November 2018

Re: Comments Regarding Review of Swap Data Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements (RIN 3038 AE12)

Dodd Frank Update: Impact on Gas & Power Transactions

Comparison of the Dodd Frank Act Title VII and the European Market Infrastructure Regulation

August 27, Dear Mr. Stawik:

Good morning Mr Azariah and Mr Prasad

CFTC, SEC Propose to Delay the Applicability of Certain Swap Provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act

CFTC Federal Register Notice

Comparison of the Dodd Frank Act Title VII and the European Market Infrastructure Regulation September 26, 2013 Anna Pinedo James Schwartz

Re: Comments in Response to Notice of Meeting of the Technology Advisory Committee

U.S. House of Representatives Passes Comprehensive OTC Derivatives Legislation

June 8, 2013 SUBMITTED ELECTRONICALLY

Security-Based Swap Execution Facilities

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission. SUMMARY: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (Commission or CFTC) is

Overview of Final Rules on Recordkeeping and Reporting of Swaps

Via Electronic Service at comments.cftc.gov May 27, 2014

CFTC Exemptive Relief Upon Effective Date of Title VII of Dodd-Frank

MARCH 2014 KEY RECENT DEVELOPMENTS. 1. Overview of FX Swap Regulatory Framework

Re: Confirmation, Portfolio Reconciliation, and Portfolio Compression Requirements for Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants [RIN 3038-AC96]

December 19, Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

Key Dodd-Frank Compliance Considerations for End-Users

Re: Comment Letter on the Further Proposed Guidance Regarding Compliance with Certain Swap Regulations (RIN 3038-AD85)

Dodd-Frank Title VII Rule Compliance Schedules A Matrix

REGULATION OF OTC DERIVATIVES Professor Jasmin Sethi. SEC University Spring 2014 Wednesday 5:45 PM 8:00 PM

Impact on End Users of Swaps

Commodity Options and Agricultural Swaps, RIN 3038 AD21

DERIVATIVES & STRUCTURED PRODUCTS

Comment Letter on the Proposed Clearing Determination Under Section 2(h) of the CEA (RIN 3038-AD86)

Swap Transaction Reporting Requirements

CFTC and Derivative Developments

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

Near Final Hong Kong Rules on Margin and Risk Mitigation Standards for Non-Centrally Cleared OTC Derivatives

U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Request for Relief Relating to Aggregation Provision in Final Block Trade Rule

Implementation of Australia s G-20 over-the-counter derivatives commitments

Canadian Margin Requirements For Uncleared Swaps. December 1, Carol E. Derk and Julie Mansi

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) / of XXX

The de minimis exception to designation as a Swap Dealer should be available to regional banks and dealers that intermediate regional Swap markets.

OTC Derivatives Markets Act of 2009

Comparison of the Dodd Frank Act Title VII and the European Market Infrastructure Regulation

Request for Relief Relating to Certain Foreign Exchange Transactions

Re: Swap Trading Relationship Documentation Requirements for Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants / 17 CFR Part 23 / RIN 3038 AC96

Introduction. Reporting The Future: The CFTC s Final Rule On Real-Time Public Reporting Of Swap Data. January 17, 2012

SEC Re-Proposes Rules Establishing a U.S. Personnel Test for Application of Dodd-Frank Security-Based Swap Requirements

September 28, Re: FX Forwards and FX Swaps Determination. Dear Mr. Secretary:

STROOCK SPECIAL BULLETIN

It s Not Just Registration: New Regulation of Swap Transactions by US and non-us Banks under the Dodd-Frank Act

CFTC Issues Final Rules on Cross- Border Uncleared Swap Margin Requirements

The Extra-territorial Impact of EMIR on Non-EU Swap Counterparties

REPORT OF THE INTERNATIONAL ENERGY LAW & TRANSACTIONS COMMITTEE

Review of Swap Data Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements (RIN 3038-AE12)

The CFTC Adopts Final Rules on the Recordkeeping and Reporting of Historical Swaps

Ms. Elizabeth Murphy Secretary Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street NE Washington, DC 20549

PROMOTING U.S. ACCESS TO NON-U.S. SWAPS MARKETS: A ROADMAP TO REVERSE FRAGMENTATION

October 25, Dear Ms. Jurgens:

Request for Interpretative Guidance and Relief on Application of Rule 1.35(a) to Asset Managers

Re: RIN 3038 AD18 / Core Principles and Other Requirements for Swap Execution Facilities

32 Segment reporting (continued) 33 Off balance sheet exposures

ASF Evening Series - OTC Derivatives Tuesday 3 September 2013 Louise McCoach, Partner Clayton Utz

February 22, Ms. Elizabeth M. Murphy Secretary Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, N.E. Washington, DC

CFTC Proposed Rules on Position Limits on Physical Commodity Derivatives

Demystifying Dodd Frank s Impact on Corporate Hedging

January 18, To Our Clients and Friends:

EMIR and DODD-FRANK FAQs. January 2017

Navigating the New Margin Requirements HKMA CR-G-14

Introduction to the Commercial End-User Exception to Mandatory Clearing of Swaps and Security-Based Swaps Under Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act

The road to reform. Helping commercial end users of OTC derivatives comply with Dodd-Frank s Title VII

What End-Users of Derivatives Need to Know About the Dodd-Frank Act

EU and US developments in the regulation of funds and derivative trading

Re: CFTC and SEC Staff Public Roundtable on International Issues relating to Dodd-Frank Title VII

Transcription:

VII. Appendix C Application of the Entity-Level Requirements to Swap Dealers and MSPs* U.S. Swap Dealer or MSP affiliate of a non-u.s.. Also applies when acting through a foreign branch. Swap Dealer or MSP affiliate of a U.S.. First Category: Second Category: 3 for U.S. counterparties; for SDR reporting with non-u.s. counterparties that are not guaranteed or conduit affiliates; compliance (except for Large Trader Reporting) with non-u.s. counterparties 4 *The Appendices to the Guidance should be read in conjunction with the rest of the Guidance. 3 4 Both Entity-Level and Transaction-Level Requirements are the ultimate responsibilities of the U.S.-based swap dealer or MSP. First Category is capital adequacy, Chief Officer, risk management, and swap data recordkeeping (except Commission regulations 3.0(b)(3) and (4)). Second Category is SDR Reporting, certain aspects of swap data recordkeeping relating to complaints and marketing and sales materials (Commission regulations 3.0(b)(3) and (4)), and Large Trader Reporting. compliance does not apply to Large Trader Reporting, i.e., non-u.s. persons that are subject to part 0 would comply with it in the same way that U.S. persons comply. With respect to the SDR Reporting requirement, the Commission may make substituted compliance available only if direct access to swap data stored at a foreign trade repository is provided to the Commission. 89

VIII. Appendix D Application of the Category A Transaction-Level Requirements to Swap Dealers and MSPs* (Category A includes () Clearing and swap processing; () Margining and segregation for uncleared swaps; (3) Trade Execution; (4) Swap trading relationship documentation; (5) Portfolio reconciliation and compression; (6) Real-time public reporting; (7) Trade confirmation; and (8) Daily trading records).** (other than Foreign Branch of U.S. Bank that is a Swap Dealer or MSP) Foreign Branch of U.S. Bank that is a Swap Dealer or MSP by, or Affiliate Conduit of, a Not by, and Not an Affiliate Conduit of, a U.S. U.S. Swap Dealer or MSP affiliate of a non- 3U.S. Foreign Branch of U.S. Bank that is a Swap Dealer or MSP Swap Dealer or MSP affiliate of a U.S. Do Not *The Appendices to the Guidance should be read in conjunction with the rest of the Guidance. ** Where one of the counterparties is electing the Inter-Affiliate Exemption, the Commission would expect the parties to the swap to comply with the conditions of the Inter-Affiliate 90

Exemption, including the treatment of outward-facing swaps condition in Commission regulation 50.5(b)(4)(i). Factors that are relevant to the consideration of whether a non-u.s. person is an affiliate conduit include whether: (i) the non-u.s. person is majority-owned, directly or indirectly, by a U.S. person; (ii) the non-u.s. person controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with the U.S. person; (iii) the non-u.s. person, in the regular course of business, engages in swaps with non-u.s. third party(ies) for the purpose of hedging or mitigating risks faced by, or to take positions on behalf of, its U.S. affiliate(s), and enters into offsetting swaps or other arrangements with such U.S. affiliate(s) in order to transfer the risks and benefits of such swaps with third-party(ies) to its U.S. affiliates; and (iv) the financial results of the non-u.s. person are included in the consolidated financial statements of the U.S. person. Other facts and circumstances also may be relevant. Under a limited exception, where a swap between the foreign branch of a U.S. swap dealer or U.S. MSP and a non-u.s. person (that is not a guaranteed or conduit affiliate) takes place in a foreign jurisdiction other than Australia, Canada, the European Union, Hong Kong, Japan, or Switzerland, the counterparties generally may comply only with the transaction-level requirements in the foreign jurisdiction where the foreign branch is located if the aggregate notional value of all the swaps of the U.S. swap dealer s foreign branches in such countries does not exceed 5% of the aggregate notional value of all of the swaps of the U.S. swap dealer, and the U.S. person maintains records with supporting information for the 5% limit and to identify, define, and address any significant risk that may arise from the non-application of the Transaction-Level Requirements. Notes: The swap trading relationship documentation requirement applies to all transactions with registered swap dealers and MSPs. Participation in multilateral portfolio compression exercises is mandatory for dealer to dealer trades. 9

IX. Appendix E Application of the Category B Transaction-Level Requirements to Swap Dealers and MSPs* (Category B is External Business Conduct Standards). Foreign (other than Branch of Foreign U.S. Bank Branch of that is a Swap U.S. Bank that Dealer or MSP is a Swap Dealer or MSP) by, or Affiliate Conduit of, a U.S. Not by, and Not an Affiliate Conduit of, a U.S. U.S. Swap Dealer or MSP affiliate of a non- U.S. U.S. Swap Dealer or MSP (when it solicits and negotiates through a foreign subsidiary or affiliate) Do Not Do Not Do Not Foreign Branch of U.S. Bank that is a Swap Dealer or MSP Do Not Do Not Do Not 9

Swap Dealer or MSP affiliate of a U.S. Do Not Do Not Do Not *The Appendices to the Guidance should be read in conjunction with the rest of the Guidance. Factors that are relevant to the consideration of whether a non-u.s. person is an affiliate conduit include whether: (i) the non-u.s. person is majority-owned, directly or indirectly, by a U.S. person; (ii) the non-u.s. person controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with the U.S. person; (iii) the non-u.s. person, in the regular course of business, engages in swaps with non-u.s. third party(ies) for the purpose of hedging or mitigating risks faced by, or to take positions on behalf of, its U.S. affiliate(s), and enters into offsetting swaps or other arrangements with such U.S. affiliate(s) in order to transfer the risks and benefits of such swaps with third-party(ies) to its U.S. affiliates; and (iv) the financial results of the non-u.s. person are included in the consolidated financial statements of the U.S. person. Other facts and circumstances also may be relevant. 93

X. Appendix F Application of Certain Entity-Level and Transaction-Level Requirements to Non-Swap Dealer/Non-MSP Market Participants* (The relevant Dodd-Frank requirements are those relating to: clearing, trade execution, real-time public reporting, Large Trader Reporting, SDR Reporting and swap data recordkeeping).** affiliate of non-u.s. Non- by, or Affiliate Conduit of, a Non- Not by, or Affiliate Conduit of, by affiliate of non-u.s. Non- by, or Affiliate Conduit of, a U.S. person Do Not Non- Not by, or Affiliate Conduit of, Do Not Do Not *The Appendices to the Guidance should be read in conjunction with the rest of the Guidance. ** Where one of the counterparties is electing the Inter-Affiliate Exemption, the Commission would generally expect the parties to the swap to comply with the conditions of the Inter- Affiliate Exemption, including the treatment of outward-facing swaps condition in Commission regulation 50.5(b)(4)(i). 94

Factors that are relevant to the consideration of whether a non-u.s. person is an affiliate conduit include whether: (i) the non-u.s. person is majority-owned, directly or indirectly, by a U.S. person; (ii) the non-u.s. person controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with the U.S. person; (iii) the non-u.s. person, in the regular course of business, engages in swaps with non-u.s. third party(ies) for the purpose of hedging or mitigating risks faced by, or to take positions on behalf of, its U.S. affiliate(s), and enters into offsetting swaps or other arrangements with such U.S. affiliate(s) in order to transfer the risks and benefits of such swaps with third-party(ies) to its U.S. affiliates; and (iv) the financial results of the non-u.s. person are included in the consolidated financial statements of the U.S. person. Other facts and circumstances also may be relevant. compliance does not apply to Large Trader Reporting, i.e., non-u.s. persons that are subject to part 0 would comply with it in the same way that U.S. persons comply. With respect to the SDR Reporting requirement, the Commission may permit substituted compliance only if direct access to swap data stored at a foreign trade repository is provided to the Commission. Issued in Washington, DC, on July 7, 03, by the Commission. Melissa D. Jurgens, Secretary of the Commission. Appendices to Interpretive Guidance and Policy Statement Regarding with Certain Swap Regulations Commission Voting Summary and Statements of Commissioners NOTE: The following appendices do not constitute a part of the Interpretive Guidance and Policy Statement itself. Appendix Commission Voting Summary On this matter, Chairman Gensler and Commissioners Chilton and Wetjen voted in the affirmative; Commissioner O Malia voted in the negative. 95