Rating criteria for securities firms. July 2017

Similar documents
Rating Criteria for Sugar Industry. February 2018

CRISIL s criteria for grading real estate developers

Rating criteria for the mining industry. February 2018

CRISIL s rating process. June 2017

CRISIL Criteria for Rating Hybrid Instruments Issued by NBFCs/HFCs. December 2016

CRISIL s bank loan ratings process, scale and default recognition. August 2017

CRISIL s bond fund credit quality ratings criteria. February 2018

Rating criteria for upstream oil & gas sector. February 2018

Ratings. Sample Report. Abc Limited. June 2017

CRISIL s criteria for rating Education institutions. January 2017

Rating criteria for toll road projects. February 2018

Rating criteria for the construction industry. February 2018

The infrastructure sector: unique rating drivers. February 2018

Rating Criteria for Power Distribution Utilities. February 2018

CRISIL s ratings and rating scales June 2017

Criteria for Rating power transmission projects. October 2016

CRISIL s criteria for consolidation. December 2016

CRISIL revises rating scale for micro and small enterprises

CRISIL s rating methodology for collateralised debt obligations (CDO) September 2018

Ratings. REIT and InvIT. A primer. August 2016

CRISIL Composite Bond Fund Index

CRISIL s criteria for rating instruments backed by guarantees

Ind AS impact. Financial statements to undergo changes, but no major rating or criteria changes foreseen since fundamentals remain the same

CRISIL Mutual Fund Ranking Methodology

Rating criteria for banks and financial institutions. November 2017

CRISIL s approach to financial ratios. December 2017

CRISIL Real Estate Star Ratings (CREST) FAQs

CRISIL Unit Linked Insurance Plan (ULIP) Ranking. Methodology document

Changes in Hybrid Segment of Indices. CRISIL Funds and Fixed Income Research

Grading Assigned: Mumbai 5 Star out of 7 Star (Assigned in September 2017) Vartak Nagar, Thane, Mumbai. Total 98,237 sq. ft.

CRISIL Indices. Summary of indices relevant for mutual fund categories specified by SEBI

CRISIL s criteria for rating annuity road projects. June 2018

CRISIL s criteria for rating annuity road projects. January 2017

Ofira. Project profile. Grading Assigned: Surat 7 Star out of 7 Star (Assigned in September 2017) Valid till September 25, Location of project

Criteria for rating wind power projects

Securitisation Market Overview Securitisation market hits a trillion, propelled by PTCs

CRISIL - AMFI Balance Fund Performance Index. Factsheet March 2018

CRISIL - AMFI ELSS Fund Performance Index. Factsheet September 2017

CRISIL - AMFI Short Term Debt Fund Performance Index. Factsheet March 2018

Planet SKS. Project profile

Evaluating risks in securitisation transactions: A primer. September 2018

Complying with CECL. We assess five ways to implement the new regulations. September 2017

Rating criteria for state governments. May 2018

Labour pain. Chartbook. Research

CRISIL - AMFI GILT Fund Performance Index. Factsheet December 2017

CRISIL - AMFI Hybrid Fund Performance Index. Factsheet September 2017

In a sweet spot. Firm prices, deleveraging to improve the credit profiles of sugar companies. May 2017

CRISIL - AMFI Small & Midcap Fund Performance Index. Factsheet March 2018

CRISIL - AMFI Income Fund Performance Index. Factsheet March 2018

Built up area: LIG ( sq.ft.); MIG ( sq.ft.); HIG ( sq.ft.)

CRISIL - AMFI Liquid Fund Performance Index. Factsheet December 2017

Swastik Universal. Project Profile. Existing Rating: Surat 5 Star. November No. of villas/blocks. No. of units Offices: 278, corporate house: 5

CRISIL - AMFI Money Market Fund Performance Index. Factsheet March 2018

CRISIL - AMFI Diversified Equity Fund Performance Index. Factsheet September 2017

10,11,497 square feet (sq ft; developer s share is 8,26,133 sq ft)

CRISIL s rating methodology for RMBS transactions. September 2018

GDP to grow at 7% in fiscal CRISIL Outlook September 2017

Residential : 2,71,235 square feet Commercial : 1,940 square feet

Seafood exports to stay robust, US shrimp export realisations to drop 10% April 2018

Tata Teleservices (Maharashtra) Limited Ratings upgraded to 'CRISIL AA-/Stable/CRISIL A1+', removed from 'Watch Developing'

CRISIL - AMFI Equity Fund Performance Index. Factsheet March 2018

CRISIL Unit Linked Insurance Plan Ranking. As on October 2017

Criteria for notching down standalone ratings of companies based on support extended to parent

Managed by ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Ltd.

Residential market unlikely to look up soon

Oranje Castle. Project profile. Grading Assigned: Lucknow 4 Star out of 7 Star (Assigned in January 2018) Valid till January 23, 2019

Insights. CRISIL'S CRITERIA FOR CORPORATE SECTOR HYBRIDS (Including perpetual securities) EQUITY H BRIDS Y. May 2011

CRISIL s rating methodology for ABS transactions

Risk spectrum of financial assets held by banks and NBFCs

UBS AG, Mumbai Branch (Scheduled Commercial Bank) (Incorporated in Switzerland with limited liability)

Sentiment sustains. CriSidEx readings, Jan-Mar and Apr-Jun April 2018 Volume 2

The South African Bank of Athens Limited. PILLAR 3 REGULATORY REPORT December 2016

UBS AG, Mumbai Branch (Scheduled Commercial Bank) (Incorporated in Switzerland with limited liability)

Risk Concentrations Principles

August CRISIL Insight. Expected Loss Based Provisioning

Amex Bank of Canada. Basel III Pillar III Disclosures December 31, AXP Internal Page 1 of 15

Criteria for rating solar power projects

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited

BERMUDA MONETARY AUTHORITY GUIDELINES ON STRESS TESTING FOR THE BERMUDA BANKING SECTOR

COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. Bank executives are in a difficult position. On the one hand their shareholders require an attractive

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES

CREDIT RATING INFORMATION & SERVICES LIMITED

Pillar 3 Disclosures. Quantitative Disclosures As at 31 December 2015

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES

Pillar 3 Disclosure Statement

Basel Pillar 3 Disclosures

PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

ADITYA BIRLA SUN LIFE PENSION MANAGEMENT LIMITED

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES

Pillar 3 Quantitative Disclosure Report For the Financial Year Ended 31 December 2013

RISK MANAGEMENT REPORT (for the Financial Year Ended 31 March 2014)

CIMB INVESTMENT BANK BERHAD (Company Number M) CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS UNAUDITED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION AS AT 30 JUNE 2015

GUIDELINE ON ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT

Wells Fargo & Company. Basel III Pillar 3 Regulatory Capital Disclosures

Wells Fargo & Company. Basel III Pillar 3 Regulatory Capital Disclosures

CIMB INVESTMENT BANK BERHAD (Company Number M) CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS UNAUDITED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION AS AT 31 MARCH 2015

RATINGS Rs.17.0 Billion Commercial Paper Programme (Enhanced from Rs.12.0 Billion) Fixed Deposit Programme. Short- Term. Rating Watch/Outlook

Merrill Lynch Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Company. Pillar 3 Disclosure. As at 31 December 2017

Wells Fargo & Company. Basel III Pillar 3 Regulatory Capital Disclosures

Transcription:

Rating criteria for securities firms July 2017

Analytical contacts Pawan Agrawal Chief Analytical Officer CRISIL Ratings Email: pawan.agrawal@crisil.com Sameer Charania Director Rating Criteria and Product Development Email: sameer.charania@crisil.com Somasekhar Vemuri Senior Director Rating Criteria and Product Development Email: somasekhar.vemuri@crisil.com Ankit Dhawan Senior Rating Analyst Rating Criteria and Product Development Email: ankit.dhawan@crisil.com In case of any feedback or queries, you may write to us at criteria.feedback@crisil.com

CRISIL rates securities firms such as primary dealers (PDs), brokerages and other financial institutions for their long- and short-term debt and commitments to counterparties. The analytical framework discussed here applies to the securities-related businesses of banks and other financial institutions. Securities firms essentially act as agents or principals in securities or derivatives products. Their business encompasses fund-based activities (government securities underwriting and trading, corporate debt underwriting and trading, and margin lending) and fee-based ones (equity and debt broking, equity and debt placement, advisory services, and asset management). The finances of securities firms are vulnerable to market risk arising from fluctuating security prices or interest rates and credit risk of counterparties. For retail brokers, the large daily transactional volume entails operational and legal risks. Unlike commercial banks and finance firms, analysis of balance sheets and financial ratios does not entirely capture the risk profile of securities firms. That s because the key risks these firms face are market and business risks, which are volatile and difficult to measure from year-end reports. These factors make it necessary to factor in the systems and processes put in place by these companies to mitigate these risks, as well as their ability to absorb losses arising due to adverse market movement. CRISIL s evaluation of securities firms comprises an analysis of the following: Business risk Management quality Risk Management systems Capital adequacy Earnings Liquidity Business risk A securities company s business risk tends to be a function of the inherent volatility, cyclicality and unpredictability of the industry, the strengths of the company s position across business segments, and diverse environmental factors. CRISIL constantly tracks developments in the securities industry and gauges their impact on business conditions. CRISIL s approach to analysing a securities company s risk profile is to deconstruct its operations into various lines of business government securities underwriting and trading, corporate debt underwriting and trading, debt broking, equity broking (retail and institutional), equity trading, and investment banking. Of late, many securities firms have started a dedicated quant desk to trade using algorithms for institutional clients or on their own books (proprietary trading). Since these algorithms run with minimal human intervention, Operational risks arising due to improper input entered (fat finger error) or algorithm malfunctioning (runaway-loop situation) need to be addressed. The risk profiles of the individual business lines are evaluated in terms of inherent business risks, strength and stability of the market position, track record, and systems and processes, including risk management systems, skill level of the staff, profitability, funding profile, and the risk culture. These individual risk profiles are then aggregated, not necessarily by an additive process. A company with a diverse portfolio of businesses that perform countercyclically to one another may achieve a lower aggregate risk profile. External factors such as regulations, state of the economy, government borrowing programme, capital needs of the corporate sector, and liquidity in the capital and money markets also have a direct bearing on business potential. 3

Management quality CRISIL considers management quality an important credit consideration for securities firms. Even at large firms, business units commonly depend on a few individuals. As a result, the ability to attract, develop and retain quality professionals can impart an important competitive edge. While assessing a company s management quality, CRISIL evaluates the experience and stability of the management and its track record in responding to market changes. The other significant exercise is an assessment of the company s risk culture in terms of the management s risk appetite and risk mitigation strategies. The size of the trading operations vis-à-vis the company s capital and income levels is a significant factor in assessing the management s risk appetite. Risk management systems In its assessment of risk management systems, CRISIL evaluates systems, policies and practices specific to the business lines as well as those pertaining to general operations of the securities company. Through management discussions and client interaction, CRISIL ascertains the risk policies and how well these policies are adhered to. Securities firms face numerous risks, including market, credit, operational, legal, regulatory, and business risks. While some risks can be quantified and measured, CRISIL goes beyond quantitative parameters to evaluate whether appropriate steps have been taken and systems put in place to address the risks. CRISIL assesses a security company s ability to define, measure, monitor and control market, credit and operational risks and lay out clear guidelines for traders and other staff. The extent to which the risk management process is truly independent in terms of reporting lines and in its ability to overcome more subtle pressures to co-opt its independence is very important. In this connection, the following factors are analysed 1 : Business segments Equity broking, loan or margin against shares RMS factors assessed Margin policy Stated margin policies and practices followed by the company, including the thresholds beyond which exposures would be automatically squared off. Debtor policy What is the policy followed by the company regarding collection of dues from its clients? Hair-cut policy While extending margin or loan against shares present in client s depository account, what kind of hair-cuts does the firm apply? Is it in adherence to that stipulated by regulations? Proprietary trading Factors taken into account while assigning limits to a trader Systems in place to prevent traders from exceeding limits or breaching securities she is allowed to invest in Primary dealership Models used for measuring and reporting market risks Capital adequacy to absorb the impact of market-related factors and interest rate shocks 1 Presents only an indicative list of factors considered by CRISIL 4

Business segments Operational risk assessment RMS factors assessed Systems and processes to implement risk management policies. This includes real-time monitoring of exposures, automation of margin calls, and square-off of exposures. Organisational structure and decision making that enables independence of risk management functions; autonomy granted to the risk management function from the trading desk Business continuity/ disaster recovery plans Adherence with compliance policies, such as know your customer and anti-money laundering policies For brokers engaged in algorithmic trading, whether systems and associated infrastructure have been audited by the exchange, or have there been materially adverse observations in the systems audit report. CRISIL notes that the models to evaluate market risks and the assumptions underlying the models are not standardised across Indian securities firms. For instance, the different risk monitoring tools used by debt traders include calculation of modified duration of the portfolio (weighted average maturity), value at risk calculations, and daily earnings at risk calculations. Similarly, sensitivity to interest rate risks is measured by using varied types of interest rate shocks by different debt traders: some consider a non-uniform shift in yield curve while others assume a uniform (or parallel) shift. As a result, CRISIL closely analyses the market risk models used by debt traders and also look at the result of back testing these models with actual historical data. This is done to assess the efficacy of the implemented models for the analysed companies. Capital adequacy CRISIL assesses a securities company s capital position in conjunction with its risk culture. The extent of proprietary trading vis-à-vis capital is also a critical factor. A high level of net worth gives a securities company the strength to withstand shocks from trading and other losses. The traditional methods of measuring capitalisation level, such as gearing (debt-equity ratio) and regulatory capital adequacy ratio, have limitations in realistically reflecting capitalisation levels of securities firms. Therefore, for primary dealers, CRISIL uses net-worth coverage in addition to the traditional measures of capital adequacy. For primary dealers, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has stipulated a minimum capital adequacy of 15% of riskweighted assets (RWAs) that takes into account the underlying credit risk as well as market risk (based on the valueat-risk approach). The PDs have been given the flexibility to adopt either their own internal risk management framework or the standardised approach prescribed by the RBI for arriving at the RWA. Additionally, CRISIL analysis also takes into account the ability of capital to withstand a shock to interest rates 2 -- that is, networth cover for portfolio losses assuming a 100 basis point parallel shift in yield curve. 2 Primary dealers are exposed to MTM losses (on account of drop in prices of held securities) if the systemic interest rates undergo an upward shift. 5

Earnings The volatility, cyclicality and unpredictability of the securities industry is best reflected in the earnings of securities firms. To get a true sense of the size and stability of a firm s returns, CRISIL examines the company s performance over a full market cycle. It is essential to examine these returns in light of the company s risk appetite. Better-managed firms handle the inherent volatility by diversifying into different segments and by having control on their fixed cost base. Hence, CRISIL s analysis includes an understanding of the management s strategy to address the inherent volatility. Liquidity Securities businesses are very confidence-sensitive; even a perception of trouble in the market can impact a company significantly. To the extent that the company depends on confidence-sensitive financing, it is exposed to the risk of funding disruptions that can have adverse effects. Many firms manage this risk by maintaining adequate levels of alternative liquidity (in the form of unencumbered assets) that can be quickly pledged in return for secured loans. Many also maintain committed bank lines for alternative liquidity. To be effective, these sources require good operational systems that permit the pledging of assets and the drawing-down of committed bank lines, regardless of market conditions. Securities firms may also use extended debt maturities to lower funding risks. In the Indian scenario, however, very few securities firms have raised long-term debt. CRISIL reviews a company s contingency liquidity plans, the feasibility of such plans, the liquidity of assets funded, and access to repo/call or securities lending markets. In the case of primary dealers, especially, CRISIL factors in their strong liquidity (in terms of reasonably liquid nature of government securities holdings and access to RBI refinance and call and repo markets) in its ratings. 1 3 For accessing the previous published document on Rating criteria for securities companies, kindly refer to the following link: https://www.crisil.com/ratings/sectormethodology/methodologydocs/crisil-ratings-crieria-securities-companies_2007-19072017.pdf 6

About CRISIL Limited CRISIL is a global, agile and innovative analytics company driven by its mission of making markets function better. We are India s foremost provider of ratings, data, research, analytics and solutions. A strong track record of growth, culture of innovation and global footprint sets us apart. We have delivered independent opinions, actionable insights, and efficient solutions to over 100,000 customers. We are majority owned by S&P Global Inc., a leading provider of transparent and independent ratings, benchmarks, analytics and data to the capital and commodity markets worldwide. About CRISIL Ratings CRISIL Ratings is part of CRISIL Limited ( CRISIL ). We pioneered the concept of credit rating in India in 1987. CRISIL is registered in India as a credit rating agency with the Securities and Exchange Board of India ( SEBI ). With a tradition of independence, analytical rigour and innovation, CRISIL sets the standards in the credit rating business. We rate the entire range of debt instruments, such as, bank loans, certificates of deposit, commercial paper, non-convertible / convertible / partially convertible bonds and debentures, perpetual bonds, bank hybrid capital instruments, asset-backed and mortgagebacked securities, partial guarantees and other structured debt instruments. We have rated over 24,500 large and midscale corporates and financial institutions. CRISIL has also instituted several innovations in India in the rating business, including rating municipal bonds, partially guaranteed instruments and microfinance institutions. We also pioneered a globally unique rating service for Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) and significantly extended the accessibility to rating services to a wider market. Over 95,000 MSMEs have been rated by us. CRISIL Privacy Notice CRISIL respects your privacy. We use your contact information, such as your name, address, and email id, to fulfil your request and service your account and to provide you with additional information from CRISIL and other parts of S&P Global Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, the Company ) you may find of interest. For further information, or to let us know your preferences with respect to receiving marketing materials, please visit www.crisil.com/privacy. You can view the Company s Customer Privacy at https://www.spglobal.com/privacy Last updated: April 2016 Argentina China Hong Kong India Poland Singapore UK USA CRISIL Limited: CRISIL House, Central Avenue, Hiranandani Business Park, Powai, Mumbai 400076. India Phone: + 91 22 3342 3000 Fax: + 91 22 3342 3001 www.crisil.com