Mecklenburg County Department of Internal Audit. Office of Tax Collector Cash Collection Audit Report 1562

Similar documents
Internal Audit. Orange County Auditor-Controller. Internal Control Audit: Social Services Agency - Revolving Cash Funds

A Key Controls Audit of the Friendly Neighborhood Senior Center

Internal Audit. Orange County Auditor-Controller

Office of the City Auditor. Committed to increasing government efficiency, effectiveness, accountability and transparency

AUDIT REPORT. Kearns Recreation Center. An Audit of Key Controls at Salt Lake County s

Salt Lake County Auditor. A Key Control Audit of the Kearns Senior Center

Accounts Receivable and Debt Collection Processes. Internal Controls and Compliance Audit

Internal Audit. Orange County Auditor-Controller

Audit Report 2018-A-0011 Town of Glen Ridge Revenue and Credit Cards

Internal Audit. Orange County Auditor-Controller. Audit of Unearned Revenue: OC Community Resources. For the Year Ended June 30, 2016

Audit Report 2018-A-0001 City of Lake Worth Water Utility Services

INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT

United States Department of the Interior

TOWN OF BURLINGTON, MASSACHUSETTS MANAGEMENT LETTER JUNE 30, 2013

A REPORT TO THE CITIZENS OF SALT LAKE COUNTY. BEN McADAMS, MAYOR. An Audit of the Key Controls of. Emergency Services.

In Brief IA Audit of Department Cash Receipts Process

LA16-06 STATE OF NEVADA. Performance Audit. Office of the Attorney General. Legislative Auditor Carson City, Nevada

COUNTY OF SONOMA. CAL-Card USER MANUAL

Audit of the Orange County Tax Collector s Office, Occupational Licensing Function

GOVERNMENT OF GUAM RETIREMENT FUND (A Public Corporation) Schedule of Findings. September 30, 2001 and 2000

Audit of the Orange County Tax Collector s Office Delinquent Tangible Personal Property Tax Collection Function

Salt Lake County Library Imprest Fund

Review of Community Centres Final Report March Audit Department. Leaders in inbuilding public trust in incivic government

Whitman County, Washington

Our Mission: To receive, safeguard, and disburse County funds. FY 2015 Proposed Budget - General Fund Expenditures

STATE OF MINNESOTA Office of the State Auditor

An Audit of Key Controls at the Midvale Senior Center Report Number 2018-MLR10

INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT

The Fire Chief, by authorization of the Board of Commissioners, has management authority over the Budget.

STATE OF NEW YORK OFFICE OF THE STATE COMPTROLLER 110 STATE STREET ALBANY, NEW YORK 12236

Review of Cash and Revenues Collection Procedures

INVESTIGATIVE FOLLOW-UP REPORT OF FORT DE SOTO PARK DEPOSIT SHORTAGE

Town of Essex. Internal Controls Over Selected Financial Operations. Report of Examination. Period Covered: January 1, 2013 October 31, M-60

SEMINOLE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT WATER AND SEWER DIVISION REVENUE AUDIT

Our Mission: To receive, safeguard, and disburse County funds

The Texas A&M University System Internal Audit Department

City of West Palm Beach Internal Auditor s Office

Board of Barber and Cosmetologist Examiners. Internal Control and Compliance Audit July 1, 2004, through June 30, 2008

An Audit of Key Controls at Copperview Recreation Center Report Number 2018-MLR12

FINAL REPORT Audit of Controls over Cable Franchise Fee Revenue

UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO INTERNAL AUDIT DEPARTMENT MANAGE CASH FLOW

Impact on Actuarially Determined Items SEAC Fall Meeting - Atlanta, GA November 19, 2003

SECTION 5 FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING

Audit Report. Franchise Agreement with Comcast Cable Communications, Inc., of Tallahassee. of the. Summary. Scope, Objectives, and Methodology

O R A N G E C O U N T Y AUDITOR CONTROLLER I N T E R N A L A U D I T

Orange County Auditor-Controller. Internal Audit. Internal Control Audit: Sheriff-Coroner Special Revenue Funds. For the Year Ended December 31, 2016

Controls Over Unclaimed Bottle Deposits. Department of Taxation and Finance

Audit and Assurance. Certificate in Accounting and Business II Examination September 2012 THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF SRI LANKA

SPECIFIC PRACTICES Cash Management Page 1

Tax Audit and Enforcement Units

The Texas A&M University System Internal Audit Department MONTHLY AUDIT REPORT

This AGREEMENT, made and entered the day of, 2013, by and W I T N E S S E T H:

(385) ; TTY / fax. Scope and Methodology. May 22, 2018

TOWN OF SOUTHAMPTON, MASSACHUSETTS. Management Letter. For the Year Ended June 30, 2014

Michigan Association of County Treasurers

The County of Chester Office of the Controller Internal Audit Department

Office of the City Auditor Audit of Oceanfront Parking

(385) ; TTY / fax. Scope and Methodology. April 30, 2018

Audit Report 2018-A-0012 City of Greenacres Capital Assets

HARDEE COUNTY PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM POLICIES AND PROCEDURES AMENDED 10/01/2015

TOWN OF WEST BROOKFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS MANAGEMENT LETTER FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2007

INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT

Lac qui Parle County Job Description

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Office of the County Administrator ADMINISTRATIVE BULLETIN SUBJECT: CASH RECEIVING, SAFEGUARDING AND DEPOSITING

Special Considerations in Auditing Complex Financial Instruments Draft International Auditing Practice Statement 1000

Internal Accounting Procedures. Approval / Amendments June 24, 2015 (AGM) Amendment 1 Amendment 2

This AGREEMENT, made and entered this the-3

AUDIT UNDP COUNTRY OFFICE AFGHANISTAN FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT. Report No Issue Date: 10 December 2013

County of Chester Office of the Sheriff

David E. Moran, Director of Education Practice

Office of Paula S. O Neil. Clerk & Comptroller. Pasco County, Florida. Pasco County Board of County Commissioners. Petty Cash and Change Fund Audit

An Audit of Key Controls at the Mount Olympus Senior Center Report Number 2018-MLR01

Capital Adequacy MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL. Weak controls may increase the bank's exposure to errors and omissions.

Internal Audit Department

AUDITOR - CONTROLLER Marcia Salter, Auditor-Controller

OFFICE OF THE CITY AUDITOR

February 2016 Recommendations

A REPORT TO THE CITIZENS OF SALT LAKE COUNTY. BEN McADAMS, MAYOR. An Audit of the Key Controls of. Tenth East Senior Center.

Philip J. LaTessa City Auditor

Internal Audit Department

CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI

State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations General Assembly Office of the Auditor General

REPORT OF INTERNAL AUDIT ACTIVITIES

Elko County Human Services Employment Opportunity Announcement

Citywide Cash Handling Procedures Performance Audit

VENTURA COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION RETIREMENT ADMINISTRATOR CHARTER

STATE OF MINNESOTA Office of the State Auditor

March 3, Re: Audit of Outside Counsel Engagement and Oversight Procedures (Audit #15-002) Executive Summary

Village of East Rockaway

Chapter 2 Books, Records, Accounts and Vouchers

Audit of Orange County s Self- Funded Employee Medical Benefits Insurance Program

Report on Internal Control Over Statewide Financial Reporting. Year Ended June 30, 2011

AUDITOR - CONTROLLER Marcia Salter, Auditor-Controller

STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION OF WELFARE AND SUPPORTIVE SERVICES

Escambia High School Audit of School Internal Accounts For the Year Ended June 30, 2017

LOUISIANA INTERNATIONAL DEEP WATER GULF TRANSFER TERMINAL AUTHORITY STATE OF LOUISIANA

FOREIGN TRADE ZONES (FTZ) MANUFACTURING TECHNICAL INFORMATION FOR PRE-ASSESSMENT SURVEY (TIPS)

Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation Division of Occupational and Professional Licensing

Chapter 10. Auditing the Revenue Process

Dairy Inspections. Department of Agriculture and Markets

Transcription:

Mecklenburg County Department of Internal Audit Office of Tax Collector Cash Collection Audit Report 1562 July 6, 2016

Internal Audit s Mission Internal Audit Contacts Staff Acknowledgements Obtaining Copies of Internal Audit Reports To support key stakeholders to cultivate an environment of accountability, transparency, and good governance. Joanne Prakapas, CPA/CFF, CIA, CRMA, CFE, Audit Director (980) 314-2889 or joanne.prakapas@mecklenburgcountync.gov Felicia Stokes, CIA, CISA, CRMA, Audit Manager (980) 314-2893 or felicia.stokes@mecklenburgcountync.gov Crystal Turner, CIA, CDFM, Auditor-In-Charge Rick Kring, CISA, Information Technology Auditor This report can be found in electronic format at http://charmeck.org/mecklenburg/county/audit/reports/pages/default.aspx

MECKLENBURG COUNTY Department of Internal Audit To: From: Neal Dixon, Tax Collector, Office of the Tax Collector Wanda Reeves, Director, Financial Services Department Joanne Prakapas, Director, Department of Internal Audit Date: July 6, 2016 Subject: Office of the Tax Collector Cash Collection Audit Report 1562 The Department of Internal Audit has completed its audit of the Office of the Tax Collector to determine whether internal controls over cash collections for the Business Tax Collections unit effectively manage key business risks inherent to those activities. Internal Audit staff interviewed key personnel; observed operations; reviewed policies and procedures; performed data analytics; and tested various activities for the period of July 1, 2012 through June 30, 2015. This audit was conducted in conformance with The Institute of Internal Auditors International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing. These standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to provide a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives. We believe the evidence obtained provides a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives. OVERALL EVALUATION Overall, key risks inherent to cash collections were managed to an acceptable level; however, opportunities exist to improve the design and operation of some control activities.

RISK OBSERVATION SUMMARY The table below summarizes the risk observations identified during the course of the audit, grouped by the associated risk factor, and defined in Appendix A. The criticality or significance of each risk factor, as well as Internal Audit s assessment of the design and operation of key controls to effectively mitigate the risks, are indicated by the color codes described in Appendix B. RISK OBSERVATION SUMMARY Risk Factors and Observations Criticality Design Operation 1. Policies and Procedures Risk 1.1 Formal Documentation 2. Reconciliation Risk 2.1 Payments 3. Compliance Risk 4. Accountability Risk 5. Receipt Risk 6. Deposit Risk 7. Physical Security Risk 8. Authorization Risk 9. Accounting Risk 10. Documentation Risk 11. Human Resource Risk 12. Timeliness Risk Internal Audit Report 1562 Page 2 of 10

The risk observations and management s risk mitigation strategies are discussed in detail in the attached document. Internal Audit will conduct a follow-up review at a later date to verify management s action plans have been implemented and are working as expected. We appreciate the cooperation you and your staff provided during this audit. Please feel free to contact me at 980-314-2889 if you have any questions or concerns. c: County Manager Deputy County Manager Assistant County Managers Deputy County Attorney Senior County Attorney Board of County Commissioners Audit Review Committee Internal Audit Report 1562 Page 3 of 10

BACKGROUND The Office of the Tax Collector (OTC) is responsible for determining and collecting business taxes and fees imposed by the City of Charlotte and Mecklenburg County, and used to support and fund local services and programs. The OTC is organized into three primary business units: Enforced Collections, Tax Support Services, and the Business Tax Collections Unit (BTCU). Mecklenburg County also acts as the City of Charlotte s agent for billing and collection of business taxes and fees for all seven municipalities within the County. The OTC s authority to bill and collect taxes and fees is provided by North Carolina General Statute (NCGS) 160A-211, which empowers cities to tax local businesses and occupations operating within city limits, and NCGS 153A, which empowers counties to tax businesses and occupations operating within the county. Business Tax Collections Unit (BTCU) The BTCU is primarily responsible for opening business accounts, processing business tax and fee payments, and enforcing all business tax program collections owed to the City and County. The BTCU uses BizTax, a fully integrated tax software system to support the collection of business taxes and fees. The BTCU also issues garage and attic sale licenses and producer peddler permits; and responds to customer inquiries. The Tax Accounting Unit within the Financial Services Department partners with the OTC to deposit the tax and fee payments; reconcile payments in Advantage, the County s general ledger system; and coordinate tax refunds and checks returned for insufficient funds. They also distribute the collected tax revenues to the County and various municipalities. The BTCU deputy tax collectors mail delinquent tax notices to business owners and conduct field visits to collect taxes. When necessary, the collectors establish and enforce payment arrangements as approved by the Board of County Commissioners, the OTC Director, or the BTCU Deputy Director. The BTCU assesses and collects gross receipt sales tax on: Hotel/motel room occupancy Prepared food and beverages Vehicle and heavy equipment rentals The BTCU also collects other fees such as taxicab licenses; beer and wine licenses; and garage and attic sale licenses. Payment Activity Taxpayers can pay their business tax bills in person, by mail, or via the internet in the form of cash, checks, money orders, credit cards, and electronic checks. The BTCU may also apply a Partial Correct which is the reversal and re-posting of a payment previously applied to an account. For example, if a business had two prepared food accounts and paid all gross receipts sales tax under one account, a Partial Correct would be applied to split payments between both accounts. Internal Audit Report 1562 Page 4 of 10

Payment Type Transactions by Payment Type FY 2015 Transactions Processed FY 2014 Transactions Processed FY 2013 Transactions Processed Cash 5,320 6,418 6,780 Check 66,360 63,905 73,884 Money Order 132 270 376 Credit Card 8,438 8,753 9,270 Partial Corrects 266 430 327 Total 80,516 79,776 90,637 Source: Business Tax Collections data, unaudited Payment Type Collection Amounts by Payment Type FY 2015 Business Taxes Collected FY 2014 Business Taxes Collected FY 2013 Business Taxes Collected Cash $257,654 $312,835 $350,684 Check $110,693,893 $98,254,222 $99,646,297 Money Order $8,496 $28,624 $36,140 Credit Card $1,618,104 $1,338,801 $1,731,073 Partial Corrects $160,506 $1,061,534 $187,152 Total $112,738,653 $100,996,017 $101,951,346 Source: Business Tax Collections data, unaudited Internal Audit Report 1562 Page 5 of 10

COUNTY MANAGER S OVERALL RESPONSE The County Manager concurs with all risk mitigation strategies and timeframes for implementation. Risk Factor Criticality Design Operation 1. Policies and Procedures Risk Risk Observation 1.1 Formal Documentation While the OTC, has formal documented policies and procedures for many aspects of its cash collection operations, some procedures do not reflect current and/or best practices. Yet, policies and procedures are important control activities to help management ensure its directives are carried out while mitigating risks that may prevent the organization from achieving its objectives. Activities impacted include but are not limited to: Field collection Staff training Roles and responsibilities Change fund reconciliation process Recommendation 1.1 Internal Audit recommends management revise its current policies and procedures to include, at a minimum: Current field collection payment reconciliation and documentation process Cash handling training requirements Change fund roles and responsibilities Change fund monthly reconciliation requirements Management s Risk Mitigation Strategy 1.1 The Business Tax Collections Unit (BTCU) within the Office of the Tax Collector (OTC) will implement the following actions in reply to the risk observation 1.1 in the Cash Collection Audit Report 1562. The actions that will be taken to address the risks are detailed below. Internal audit recommended that management revise current policies and procedures for the following: Current field collection payment reconciliation and documentation process Cash handling training requirements Change fund roles and responsibilities Change fund monthly reconciliation requirements Internal Audit Report 1562 Page 6 of 10

The OTC will implement the following to mitigate the observed risk: Current field collection payment reconciliation and documentation process The BTCU manual will be reorganized to consistently identify/name the payment reconciliation and documentation process. This will result in common terms and consistent report names being used throughout the manual. For example, the report documenting the daily activity of the Deputy Tax Collector staff will be called the Account Contact Listing report. This matches the report name in the tax system. Before this change, the manual referred to it using multiple names. Status: In progress to be completed by June 30, 2016 Cash handling training requirements Section 9 of the BTCU manual will be updated to include the annual requirement that each employee attest that he or she has reviewed, understands, and will comply with the Mecklenburg County and OTC cash handling policies by signing the policies. The manual will include hyperlinks to each individual policy. Status: In progress to be completed by June 30, 2016 Change fund roles and responsibilities Section 9 of the BTCU manual will be updated to include a subsection entitled Change Fund. The subsection defines change fund as outlined in Mecklenburg County s Petty Cash and Change Fund Index. The manual will specifically state that the BTCU Supervisor is the change fund custodian who is directly responsible for the administration of the fund. The manual will also state that the Custodian and the employee who receives the change will verify the amount and attest to it being correct by signature. Signatures are provided when the funds are reconciled. The subsection will also include a hyperlink to the policy. Status: In progress to be completed by June 30, 2016 Change fund monthly reconciliation requirements Section 9 of the BTCU manual will be updated to include a subsection entitled Change Fund. The subsection defines change fund as outlined in Mecklenburg County s Petty Cash and Change Fund Index. The monthly reconciliation requirements administered by the Custodian will be defined and detailed in this section including the following: A. The Custodian must reconcile the fund by the last business day of the month. B. The BTCU staff complies with the Petty Cash and Change Fund Index, OTC Cash Handling Policy, and all associated policies and procedures at all times. C. The change fund is not used to cash checks. D. The change fund is always secured in the money room/safe. E. The fund is always in balance. F. The fund is replenished timely so that funds are readily available as needed. G. Any discrepancies in the fund are reported to the Department Director and Deputy Tax Director immediately. Internal Audit Report 1562 Page 7 of 10

The subsection will also include a hyperlink to the policy. Status: In progress to be completed by June 30, 2016 Risk Factor Criticality Design Operation 2. Reconciliation Risk Risk Observation 2.1 Tax Payments The Financial Services Department staff does not reconcile tax payments recorded in BizTax and Advantage as required by County policy to ensure accuracy and to timely detect errors or omissions. Recommendation 2.1 Internal Audit recommends the Financial Services Department monthly reconcile payments recorded in BizTax against those revenues posted to Advantage. The reconciliations should evidence the preparer; date of preparation; support for reconciling items; any related corrective actions taken; and management s review and approval of the reconciliation. Management s Risk Mitigation Strategy 2.1 The Finance Team has reconciled Business Tax Collections in BIZTAX to the Advantage Financial System and FY 2016 reconciliations are up-to-date. Effectively immediately, in addition to the daily reconciliation, each month the Finance Team will reconcile the collection for Business Tax Collections in BIZTAX to the Advantage Financial System. Reconciling items will be noted, researched, and resolved within the next accounting period. The preparer, date, supporting documentation, any action taken or needed, the reviewer signature and management approval is noted on the reconciliation. Internal Audit Report 1562 Page 8 of 10

APPENDIX A Risk Factor Definitions Risk Factor Policies and Procedures Risk Reconciliation Risk Authorization Risk Accountability Risk Receipt Risk Deposit Risk Accounting Risk Physical Security Risk Timeliness Risk Documentation Risk Human Resource Risk Compliance Risk Definition Policies and procedures that are non-existent, ineffective, unclear, or outdated may result in poorly executed processes and increased operating costs. Failure to consistently and completely accounts, transactions, and other activities may prevent accounting errors or omissions from being timely detected and adjusted. Failure to clearly articulate and communicate those with the authority to commit the organization may result in internal and external misunderstandings. Failure to establish and maintain accountability of funds collected, assigned, or transferred to individuals may result in lost or stolen, or otherwise diverted funds. Failure to properly receipt cash may compromise accountability and result in untimely or inaccurate compilation and reporting of information needed for financial or internal analysis of operating results. Failure to deposit cash receipts intact may result in a loss of funds or have a material impact on reported financial and operational information. Failure to accurately and timely record transactions may result in untimely or inaccurate compilation of information needed for financial and operational reporting and analysis. Inadequate physical security may allow unauthorized access to data files, programs, hardware, etc., increasing the risk of loss or impairment. Failure to comply with State deposit regulations may increase result in fines, penalties, criminal or civil claims, and/or damage to the organization's reputation. Failure to adequately collect, file, and retain documentation may impair the organization s ability to sufficiently support cash receipt activities, financial reporting, and/or disclosure requirements. Failure to attract, train, develop, deploy, and/or empower competent personnel may inhibit the organization s ability to execute, manage, and monitor key business activities. Lack of compliance with established policies, procedures, and/or statutory requirements may result in unacceptable performance that impacts financial, operational, or customer objectives. Internal Audit Report 1562 Page 9 of 10

APPENDIX B Color Code Definitions The criticality of a risk factor represents the level of potential exposure to the organization and/or to the achievement of process-level objectives before consideration of any controls in place (inherent risk). Criticality Significance and Priority of Action The inherent risk poses or could pose a significant level of exposure to the organization and/or to the achievement of process level objectives. Therefore, management should take immediate action to address risk observations related to this risk factor. The inherent risk poses or could pose a moderate level of exposure to the organization and/or to the achievement of process level objectives. Therefore, management should take prompt action to address risk observations related to this risk factor. The inherent risk poses or could pose a minimal level of exposure to the organization and/or to the achievement of process level objectives. Risk observations related to this risk factor, however, may provide opportunities to further reduce the risk to a more desirable level. The assessment of the design and operation of key controls indicates Internal Audit s judgment of the adequacy of the process and system design to mitigate risks to an acceptable level. Assessment Design of Key Controls Operation of Key Controls The process and system design does not appear to be adequate to manage the risk to an acceptable level. The process and system design appear to be adequate to manage the risk to an acceptable level. Failure to consistently perform key risk management activities may, however, result in some exposure even if other tasks are completed as designed. The process and system design appear to be adequate to manage the risk to an acceptable level. The operation of the process risk management capabilities is not consistently effective to manage the risk to an acceptable level. The operation of the process risk management capabilities is only partially sufficient to manage the risk to an acceptable level. The operation of the process risk management capabilities appears to be sufficient to manage the risk to an acceptable level. Internal Audit Report 1562 Page 10 of 10