Workers Compensation Exposure Rating Gerald Yeung, FCAS, MAAA Senior Actuary Swiss Re America Holding Corporation

Similar documents
NCCI s New ELF Methodology

WCIRB Actuarial Committee Meeting

PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Empirical Pennsylvania Loss Distribution

PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Empirical Pennsylvania Loss Distribution

PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Empirical Pennsylvania Loss Distribution

PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Empirical Pennsylvania Loss Distribution

PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Empirical Pennsylvania Loss Distribution

January 1, 2015 Pure Premium Rate Filing Summary of Actuarial Committee Recommendations

Building Actuarial Cost Models from Health Care Claims Data for Strategic Decision-Making. Introduction. William Bednar, FSA, FCA, MAAA

January 1, 2013 Pure Premium Rate Filing Actuarial and C & R Committee Recommendations

Agenda. Trend considerations, including frequency What is trend? Exposure Loss Resources Methodologies. Workers compensation: what about frequency?

The Performance of Total Payroll as the Exposure Base for Workers Compensation An Updated Analysis

PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Empirical Pennsylvania Loss Distribution

PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Empirical Pennsylvania Loss Distribution

To Members of the Actuarial Committee, WCIRB Members and All Interested Parties:

January 1, 2019 Pure Premium Rate Filing Summary of Actuarial Committee Recommendations Governing Committee Meeting August 8, 2018

The Honorable Teresa D. Miller, Pennsylvania Insurance Commissioner. John R. Pedrick, FCAS, MAAA, Vice President Actuarial Services

State of Florida Office of Insurance Regulation Financial Services Commission

Why Pooling Works. CAJPA Spring Mujtaba Datoo Actuarial Practice Leader, Public Entities Aon Global Risk Consulting

2013 California Retrospective Rating Plan Technical Documentation

Reporting of Small Medical Only Claims

Perspectives on European vs. US Casualty Costing

Workers Compensation Ratemaking An Overview

November 29, 2011 VIA HAND DELIVERY

INTRODUCTION TO EXPERIENCE RATING Reinsurance Boot Camp Dawn Happ, Senior Vice President Willis Re

Actuarial Memorandum: F-Classification and USL&HW Rating Value Filing

WORKERS COMPENSATION CLAIM COSTS AND TRENDS IN VIRGINIA

Impact of Senate Bill No. 863 on Loss Development Patterns Released: August 13, 2013

Workers Compensation Ratemaking An Overview

Florida Office of Insurance Regulation I-File Workflow System. Filing Number: Request Type: Entire Filing

Basic Reserving: Estimating the Liability for Unpaid Claims

WC-5 Just How Credible Is That Employer? Exploring GLMs and Multilevel Modeling for NCCI s Excess Loss Factor Methodology

A GUIDE TO UNDERSTANDING, COMMUNICATING, AND INFLUENCING ACTUARIAL RESULTS

WCIRB Actuarial Committee Meeting

To Members of the Actuarial Committee, WCIRB Members and All Interested Parties:

Tennessee. Voluntary Loss Costs, Assigned Risk Rates, and Rating Values Filing Proposed Effective March 1, 2018

Introduction to Increased Limits Ratemaking

Antitrust Notice. Copyright 2010 National Council on Compensation Insurance, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

A REVIEW OF CURRENT WORKERS COMPENSATION COSTS IN NEW YORK

National Council on Compensation Insurance, Inc. Excess Loss Factors

Barbara Thurston, FCAS, MAAA Actuary and Risk Administrator, APEI

RE: PCRB Filing C-369, Loss Cost Filing to Reflect the Impact of the Protz Decision Effective November 1, 2017

Workers Compensation Claim Frequency Continues to Fall in 2006

NCCI Research Investigating the Drivers of the 2015 Workers Compensation Medical Severity Decline

NEW YORK COMPENSATION INSURANCE RATING BOARD Loss Cost Revision

Workers Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau of California. July 1, 2015 Pure Premium Rate Filing REG

New York State Workers Compensation Costs

WCIRB Report on June 30, 2017 Insurer Experience

KENTUCKY. August 18, 2016

WCIRB Report on December 31, 2013 Insurer Experience Released: April 4, 2014

Reinsurance Pricing Basics

Workers Compensation Temporary Total Disability Indemnity Benefit Duration 2011 Update

Post-level premium term experience

WCIRB Report on September 30, 2017 Insurer Experience

Large bodily injury claims in Europe. Swiss Re Nordics Motor Roundtable, August 2018, Anita Wackerl

Workers Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau of California. January 1, 2011 Pure Premium Rate Filing

Mary Jean King, FCAS, FCA, MAAA Consulting Actuary 118 Warfield Road Cherry Hill, NJ P: F:

California Workers Compensation Claims Monitoring:

NEW YORK COMPENSATION INSURANCE RATING BOARD Loss Cost Revision

NCCI Presentation to Advisory Council on Workers Compensation. October 14, Amy Quinn (803)

MODELS FOR QUANTIFYING RISK

2016 Chicago Actuarial Association

Estimating the Unpaid Cost of Coal Worker Pneumoconiosis Claims Filed Under the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act

WORKERS COMPENSATION EXCESS LOSS DEVELOPMENT

WCIRB Mod Talks 2019 Experience Rating Plan Treatment of Exception Claims April 26, 2018

Model To Develop A Provision For Adverse Deviation (PAD) For The Longevity Risk for Impaired Lives. Sudath Ranasinghe University of Connecticut

2011 RPM Basic Ratemaking Workshop. Agenda. CAS Exam 5 Reference: Basic Ratemaking Chapter 11: Special Classification *

Consulting Actuaries A REVIEW OF CURRENT WORKERS COMPENSATION COSTS IN NEW YORK

Workers Compensation Mega Claims

Homeowners Ratemaking Revisited

NCCI Research Workers Compensation and Prescription Drugs 2016 Update

Classification Relativities Preliminary Draft

The Role of ERM in Reinsurance Decisions

The Workplace Safety & Insurance Board of Ontario

MEDICAL DATA CALL INTRODUCTION

Farmers Insurance Group of Companies Berkshire Hathaway Homestate Companies. Public Members of Governing Committee State Compensation Insurance Fund

Workers compensation: what about frequency?

January 1, 2019 Pure Premium Rate Filing

Reinsurance Structures and Pricing Pro-Rata Treaties. Care Reinsurance Boot Camp Josh Fishman, FCAS, MAAA August 12, 2013

Određivanje cijene reosiguranja viška štete za zelenu kartu / Pricing of Green Card XL Reinsurance

First Aid Claim Reporting and Potential Future Changes to Experience Rating

Indemnity Data Call Quarterly Record Reporting

Proposed 2017 Rating Values and the 2017 Experience Modification Estimator

STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE 300 Capitol Mall, 17 th Floor Sacramento, CA PROPOSED DECISION

SERFF Tracking #: INCR State Tracking #: Company Tracking #: 1/1/2018 RATES

To: Administration and Finance Committee Date: October 20, 2015

Farmers Insurance Group of Companies Berkshire Hathaway Homestate Companies. Public Members of Governing Committee State Compensation Insurance Fund

Stochastic Analysis Of Long Term Multiple-Decrement Contracts

NEW YORK STATE WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD ASSESSMENTS

Workers Compensation Medical Cost Issues

The Regulatory Filing Process

Workers Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau of California. July 1, 2018 Pure Premium Rate Filing REG

Motor Claims A challenge for the industry. Dr. Nicola Rautmann / Stefan Speer, , Reinsurance EMEA

SECOND EDITION. MARY R. HARDY University of Waterloo, Ontario. HOWARD R. WATERS Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh

Iowa. Voluntary and Assigned Risk Rates and Rating Values Filing Proposed Effective January 1, 2018

W o r k e r s C o m p e n s a t i o n I n s u r a n c e R a t i n g B u r e a u o f C a l i f o r n i a

EXAMINING COSTS AND TRENDS OF WORKERS COMPENSATION CLAIMS IN NEW YORK STATE

Creative Solutions to Rising Employee Benefit Costs. September 12, 2016

TENNESSEE. October 6,

RESEARCH BRIEF September 2018 By Robert Fogelson, Brett King, and Ziv Kimmel

Transcription:

Workers Compensation Exposure Rating Gerald Yeung, FCAS, MAAA Senior Actuary Swiss Re America Holding Corporation Table of Contents NCCI Excess Loss Factors 3 WCIRB Loss Elimination Ratios 7 Observations from a Reinsurer's Perspective 12 Swiss Re Claim Valuation Model 14 2 Excess Loss Factors National Council on Compensation Insurance 3 1

NCCI ELFs Key Proposed 2013-14 Changes Source of Data Policy Periods 2000-05 @ 6 th 10 th reports (2005 @ 6 th only) Was Policy Periods 1995-97 (Fatal, PT) and 1995 @ 5 th report (TT, PT, MO) Determination of Claim Grouping Permanent Partial and Temporary Total now split between Likely to Develop and Not Likely to Develop New groupings based on injured body part and claim status Loss Development by Size of Loss Based on annual LDFs observed during a ten year period Ultimate LDFs extrapolated based on exponential mortality Rescaled LDFs are applied to open claims in order to balance to overall ratemaking dollars by state, claim group and report level Source: NCCI Actuarial Committee Meeting Minutes - January 30, 2013 4 NCCI ELFs Key Proposed 2013-14 Changes Dispersion Method Ultimate LDFs distributed log normally Form of Body of Curve Empirical distribution replaced by mixed lognormal fits Form of Tail of Curve Mixed exponential tail replaced by Generalized Pareto Curves by State by Claim Group Data pooled to calculate countrywide curve for each claim group Adjusted to state level based on relative CVs Source: NCCI Actuarial Committee Meeting Minutes - January 30, 2013 5 NCCI ELFs Key Proposed 2013-14 Changes Calculation of Loss Weights by State and Hazard Group for Each Claim Group Multi-level models are used to separately estimate severities and claim counts Models capture state, hazard group and claim group effects Minimal tempering of empirical severities Estimated claim counts and severities are combined to produce loss weights Stabilizing ELFs for Annual Updates Source: NCCI Actuarial Committee Meeting Minutes - January 30, 2013 6 2

Loss Elimination Ratios Workers Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau of California 7 Key 2011 Changes to WCIRB LERs Source of Data PYs 2004 and 2005, skipped 2002 and 2003 because of the reform Adjustments by Injury Type Loss Development "Re-opening rates for the largest claim size layers are 12-15%" Benefit Levels Trend Off-Balance Source: WCIRB 2011 California Retrospective Rating Plan Technical Documentation - January 1, 2011 8 Key 2011 Changes to WCIRB LERs Hazard Groups "The revised weighting scheme was selected as it corresponded closely with the interests of practitioners." Substituted classification severities with aggregate severities for the largest size of loss layers 7 HGs, but classes assigned differently from NCCI 8810 A for California, C for NCCI Form of Tail of Curve (above $2M) Empirical frequency Pareto severity Source: WCIRB 2011 California Retrospective Rating Plan Technical Documentation - January 1, 2011 9 3

Key 2013 Changes to WCIRB LERs Source of Data PYs 2005 (AY 2006), 2006-07 Retro HGs used for Class Ratemaking Truncated Pareto used for Tail Continued Shift to Medical Loss Development "Developments on older claims are often larger than expected because of the rate of inflation." E.g. new prosthetic eye once a decade Source: WCIRB 2013 California Retrospective Rating Plan Technical Documentation - January 1, 2013 10 Key 2013 Changes to WCIRB LERs Vector Trend differential trends by incurred medical percentile Trends for the smallest and largest claims tend to be smaller in absolute value Trends for the medium claims tend to be larger Relativities for years with positive or negative aggregate trends tend to be symmetrical opposites Source: WCIRB 2013 California Retrospective Rating Plan Technical Documentation - January 1, 2013 11 Observations From a Reinsurer's Perspective 12 4

Observations Bureau ELFs / LERs not Designed for Reinsurers Empirical Loss Development Prefer modeling based on First Principles, e.g. longevity, medical inflation, technology Limited Observation Period for Loss Development Are carriers adjusting reserves during this time frame? Reserves are not typically payment driven Not forward-looking Loss Development by Size of Loss Uncertainty of large loss development adequately reflected? 13 Claim Valuation Model Swiss Re Proprietary Tool 14 Claim Valuation Model Fundamentals A stochastic model based on the Monte Carlo simulation Quantifies the impact of various factors on large individual workers compensation claims Allows claimant to change status (e.g. from disabled to active) Utilizes transition probabilities Recognizes medical costs increase during critical health conditions Modifies mortality table based on injury type and comorbidity severity Expected lifetime decreases with severe injuries and conditions such as heart disease, cancer, diabetes Models the probability of settlement After Maximum Medical Improvement (MMI) the probability of settlement decreases over time 15 5

Claim Valuation Model Medical Inflation CVM ties medical inflation to a calendar year index (Personal Consumption Expenditures-Health Care) applied to all medical maintenance payments In addition to price changes in consumer goods and services, PCE captures corresponding changes in utilization. PCE includes all expenditures made on behalf of households by consumers, government and employers and is adjusted for population growth. Produced by the BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics) price indices and other data sources PCE tracks medical cost components that align with our big medical claim spends. (Ophthalmic products and orthopedic appliances, drug preparations and sundries, medical care, other professional services, hospitals, nursing homes and health services) Unlike CPI, it accounts for technological advancements and obsolescence. 16 Claim Valuation Model Components Main Life Components: Gender Date of Birth Date of Injury Kind of Injury Loss of Income Benefits: Inforce or Settled? State of Adjudication Medical: Inforce or Settled? Paid to Date: Medical Indemnity Cedent Reserves: Medical Indemnity Non-recurring medical costs year 1 Non-recurring medical costs year 2 Nursing care cost per year Nursing care years until start Chronic meds cost per year Chronic meds years until start Surgery event cost Surgery event years until repeat (0 = no recurrence) 17 Claim Valuation Model Impact Large Loss Examples Example 1: This was a $1.9M ground-up claim from a worker who was hit by a car while unloading a truck from the rear. The worker's legs were injured, requiring amputation. Claimant was 44 yrs. old when injured. Expected remaining lifetime is 23 years. Indemnity benefit is $107 per week. Annual medical expense (before growth) is $82,000 per year. Layer is $9.5M xs $500k. Swiss Re ACR* of $3.3M was posted in September 2012. ACR* increased to $4.1M in March 2013 as annual medical expense is averaging $118,000 per year. Example 2: This was a $916k ground-up claim involving a slip and fall off of a crane. Claimant was 50 yrs. old when injured. Expected remaining lifetime is 22 years. Lifetime indemnity benefit is $485 per week. Annual medical expense (before growth) is $5,650 per year. Layer is $750k xs $250k. Swiss Re ACR* of -$95k was posted in September 2009. Claim closed in November 2010. * Additional Case Reserve suggested by the Claim Valuation Model 18 6

Claim Valuation Model Analysis Cedent Reserves > SR Reserves 0% SR Reserves > Cedent Reserves = Average Reserve Difference Left Edge is 10 th Percentile Right Edge is 90 th Percentile -35% 81% 233% Company 1-35% 27% 179% Company 2-55% -31% 131% Company 3 Layer sample size > 250 19 Thank you Legal notice 2013 Swiss Re. All rights reserved. You are not permitted to create any modifications or derivatives of this presentation or to use it for commercial or other public purposes without the prior written permission of Swiss Re. Although all the information used was taken from reliable sources, Swiss Re does not accept any responsibility for the accuracy or comprehensiveness of the details given. All liability for the accuracy and completeness thereof or for any damage resulting from the use of the information contained in this presentation is expressly excluded. Under no circumstances shall Swiss Re or its Group companies be liable for any financial and/or consequential loss relating to this presentation. 21 7