Are Missoula s Property Taxes High? An Update

Similar documents
An Overview of Montana Taxes

The Outlook for Real Estate and Construction

Local Outlook: Butte-Anaconda. By Paul E. Polzin Director Emeritus Bureau of Business and Economic Research The University of Montana

Local Outlook: Fergus County. By Paul E. Polzin Director Emeritus Bureau of Business and Economic Research The University of Montana

PROPERTY ASSESSMENT AND TAXATION

Total state and local business taxes

Montana Manufacturing & Forest Products: 2013 Outlook. Todd A. Morgan, CF

MT Billings CA NV. Calgary, Alberta CANADA. Seattle Spokane. Fargo. Portland. Salt Lake City. Denver. Williston. Great Falls.

Montana Manufacturing: Issues & Outlook Todd A. Morgan, CF

Montana Manufacturing & Forest Products: 2014 Outlook. Todd A. Morgan, CF

Understanding Property Taxes 2007

Total state and local business taxes

Total state and local business taxes

Montana Manufacturing & Forest Products: 2010 Outlook. Todd A. Morgan, CF

Certified Taxable Values

PROPERTY ASSESSMENT AND TAXATION

Understanding Property Taxes

MAXIMUM STATUTORY LEVY RATES

50-State Property Tax Comparison Study: For Taxes Paid in Executive Summary

Introduction. Evaluation of Utah s Tax System

MAXIMUM STATUTORY LEVY RATES

Montana Manufacturing & Forest Products:

Background & Overview

Proposition D Fire, Police and Emergency Services Bond Measure

FORMER MACY S DEPARTMENT STORE 1406 N GALLERIA DR NAMPA, ID

Background & Overview

Tax Rates and Tax Burdens in the District of Columbia - A Nationwide Comparison

Department of. Assessment & Taxation

Tax Millage and Levies

Transportation Funding Overview. Travis Brouwer, ODOT Assistant Director House Transportation Policy Committee March 8, 2017

917 S. LUSK STREET BOISE, ID LEW MANGLOS, MBA, CCIM, SIOR

The City of Arden Hills Truth-In-Taxation Hearing:

BUSINESS OUTLOOK PRESENTATION

FINANCING STRATEGIES FOR LIVABLE COMMUNITIES AARP Livable Communities National Conference Dallas, Texas November 15, 2017

Capital Gains: Its Recent, Varied, and Growing (?) Impact on State Revenues

Las Vegas Housing Market Conditions Volume 34, 1st Quarter, 2005

Utah Taxpayers Association 2009 Property Tax Report

Tax Comparisons for Nebraska

DEBT STRATEGY REPORT. City of Boise FY 2012/2013 Biennial Budget OVERVIEW

TABLE 1 TABLE 2. STATUTORY STATE LIMITATION MEASURES Year Limitation

Western Economic. evelopments IN THIS ISSUE. District economies gain momentum in early Job growth intensifies and spreads

To the Citizens of Cedar Falls:

GENERAL REVENUE SHARING AND TAX REFORM CHANGES: IMPLICATIONS FOR STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS

Proposed Public Safety Levy. City of Billings

brand basics what s your story?

Local Government in Carroll County and the New County Income Taxes

The House Proposal for Property Tax Relief & Reform HB 7001 & HJR 7089

REVENUE ASSUMPTIONS. Actual Actual Adopted Revised Adopted TOTAL SOURCES BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $

Economic Indicators for the Laramie Area Annual Trends Edition

PUBLIC DISCLOSURE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ACT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

TABOR, GALLAGHER, AND MILL LEVIES

2007 Utah Property Tax Report

FY15 REVENUES. FY 14 Adopted Taxes. General Fund $ $ $753.50

Total State and Local Business Taxes

Faculty Paper Series

Population Trends in the Larger Greater Yellowstone Region Population Trends in the 8-County Area Surrounding Park County, WY

Gallatin County, Montana

Total state and local business taxes

U.S. and Montana Economic Outlook

Computation of the General Obligation Debt Margin ($ in thousands) TOTAL ESTIMATED ACTUAL PROPERTY VALUATION $134,976,735

Ranking of 1998 Per Capita Expenditures Cities Over 2,500 in Population

State Tax Relief for the Poor

Perspectives on Property Tax Exemptions in Texas, Including Those for Economic Development

2013 Mill Levy FACTS

The Fiscal Impact of the Proposed City of Sharon Springs on Forsyth County, Georgia

FY16 REVENUES. FY 15 Adopted Taxes. General Fund $ $ $ Voter Approved Debt Service $37.30 $36.90 $37.50

Volume III Issue III. The Fiscal Impact of Southern Nevada Tourism: The Industry s Contribution to Major Public Revenues 2010 Update

Taxes: This 2019 Budget holds property and income taxes for city services at their current rates.

Property Tax In New Mexico: Background, Recent Trends and Current Issues

City Fee Report State of Minnesota Cluster Analysis for Minnesota Cities By Fee Category

ECONorthwest ECONOMICS FINANCE PLANNING

Bellingham Medic One Levy Frequently Asked Questions

REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND DEBT OF MINNESOTA CITIES OVER 2,500 IN POPULATION YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001

COOPERATIVE EXTENSION Bringing the University to You

New Mexico Department of Finance and Administration Local Government Division Property Valuation Estimate

Property Taxation of Business Personal Property

Questions to consider

GENERAL FUND Revenues

Total state and local business taxes. State-by-state estimates for fiscal year 2011 July 2012

Adoption of Budget and Certification of City Taxes

STATE AND LOCAL TAXES A Comparison Across States

Montana Poverty Report Card

An Overview of Montana Taxes

Property Tax System Overview. Prepared for the Property Tax Working Group

MAJOR REVENUE SOURCES - GENERAL FUND

Commission Memorandum

Las Vegas Housing-Market Conditions

To the Citizens of Cedar Falls:

Chapter 5. REMAINING REVIEW FACTORS

Lake County. Government Finance Study. Supplemental Material by Geography. Prepared by the Indiana Business Research Center

FY2017 BUDGET WHERE DOES THE MONEY COME FROM? AND WHERE DOES IT GO?

MANAGEMENT S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

Property Taxes: A West Virginia Primer

FLORIDA S PROPERTY TAX REFORM LEGISLATION: AN ECONOMIC REVIEW

No Gain, Just Pain Most Oregonians would not benefit from Measure 59, but they would lose public services. by Michael Leachman and Joy Margheim

Cash Basis Reporting Form Excerpts

Revenue Manual December 2017

GENERAL FUND Revenues

Project Montana's Ageing Population. Prepared By: George W. Haynes, Professor Myles J. Watts, Professor Douglas J. Young, Professor Emeritus


Transcription:

Are Missoula s Property Taxes High? Page 1 Are Missoula s Property Taxes High? An Update Douglas J Young Professor Emeritus Montana State University Bozeman djyoung@montana.edu This is an updated version of a report under the same title to the Missoula Organization of REALTORS dated October 1, 2014. This update was paid for by Rhoades, Siefert & Erickson, PLLC. Any errors are the sole responsibility of the author. Updated January, 2018

Are Missoula s Property Taxes High? Page 2 Executive Summary Residents of Missoula pay the highest property tax rates among the major cities in Montana (Billings, Bozeman, Butte, Great Falls, Helena, Kalispell, and Missoula). Tax rates also known as mill levies in Missoula are about 15 percent higher than the average of the seven cities. Missoula s mill levies are higher, because both the county and city mill levies are higher than average. Education levies are close to average. Multiple factors contribute to high mill levies. One is government spending: both Missoula County and Missoula City spending per person are the highest among the comparison communities. A relatively low tax base also contributes to higher mill levies: Missoula s city and county tax bases are 9-13 percent below the average of the comparison governments. Comparisons with other states are more difficult, because property tax systems and property values differ so much across states. However, the evidence indicates that Montana residential property taxes are below national averages in both dollar terms and as a percentage of property value. Property tax mill levies have increased dramatically since the early 1990s in all the major cities and counties in Montana. City of Missoula mill levies increased 85 percent, and Missoula County levies increased 95 percent. One reason for the increases is that the property tax base failed to keep up with inflation, as legislative changes reduced taxable values. In dollar terms, property taxes increased on a per person basis even after accounting for inflation, while they rose slightly as a percentage of income. Although no one enjoys paying property taxes, they are a key element in financing government services at the state and local levels. Whether Missoula s property taxes are too high depends on a comparison of the costs (taxes) and benefits of the services provided.

Are Missoula s Property Taxes High? Page 3 1. Property Tax Mill Levies Figure 1 displays the property tax mill levies in the seven large cities in Montana. Residents of Missoula pay the highest mill levies. Mill levies are 106 mills or 15 percent higher than the average of the 7 cities. Figure 1. 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 670 690 Property Tax Mills Levied FY 2015-16 742 666 730 779 836 0 Billings Bozeman Butte Great Falls Helena Kalispell Missoula Montana TaxPayers Association Table 1 displays property tax mill levies by use. 1 Missoula s mill levies are the second highest at the county level and the highest at the city level. Education levies are close to average. Missoula s special district levy to finance Urban Transportation is also above average. Note that the county mill levies in Figure 1 and Table 1 are those applicable to city residents; they do not include county levies for roads which are not assessed within cities. Table 1. Mill Levies by Use County City County+ City Gen'l Educ Univ Sys Spec Dists Totals Billings 108 159 267 393 6 4 670 Bozeman 101 208 309 375 6 0 690 Butte 390 332 6 14 742 Great Falls 122 190 312 328 6 20 666 Helena 174 165 339 382 6 3 730 Kalispell 142 206 348 423 6 3 779 Missoula 168 253 421 369 6 40 836 Average 136 197 341 372 6 12 730 1 Butte Silver Bow levies a combined city-county tax that cannot be broken down into separate city and county components. Source: Montana Taxpayers Association, Montana Taxation (forthcoming), p. 55.

Are Missoula s Property Taxes High? Page 4 Many communities levy additional miscellaneous taxes for fire protection, parks and other special uses, and for special improvement districts (SIDs), which may substantially increase property tax bills. In Missoula County these include Arlee, Clinton, East Missoula, Florence, Frenchtown, Missoula Rural, and Seeley Lake Fire Districts, Carleton and Seeley Lake Cemeteries, an Open Space Bond, a Conservation District, two health-related levies, Animal Control, East Missoula Sewer and Elk Meadows Water. The City of Missoula collects property taxes to finance numerous SIDs such as those to provide street lighting, sidewalks and curbs, sewers and storm drains. 2 Some communities also include fees for water and/or sewer on their property tax bills, while other communities send a separate bill for these services. As a result, the data below are not entirely comparable across communities. Figure 2 below summarizes these Miscellaneous Taxes, SIDs and fees at the county level for fiscal years 2011 and 2016. The various jurisdictions (city, county, fire district, etc.) in Missoula County levy a total of $199 per person, compared with an average of $230 per person among the seven major counties. Miscellaneous taxes, SIDs and fees in Missoula are the fourth highest among the counties. The highest values are in Silverbow County, and the lowest are in Gallatin County. Among these counties, miscellaneous taxes, SIDs and fees increased an average of 19 percent in the last five years; Missoula s increased 34 percent. Figure 2. 2. Property Taxes and Mill Levies This section describes how property taxes are calculated and their relationship to mill levies. It is a little bit technical, but it is helpful for understanding how one s property tax bill is determined. A more complete description is available from the Montana Department of Revenue s Biennial Report 2014-16. 3 2 A 2014 list is available at http://www.ci.missoula.mt.us/documentcenter/home/view/393. 3 The details of the calculations change from year to year. See https://revenue.mt.gov/home/publications/biennial_reports.aspx

Are Missoula s Property Taxes High? Page 5 Property taxes are measured in dollars while mill levies are rates of taxation. The relationship between them is: Property Taxes = Mill Levy/1000 x Taxable Value of Property For example, a mill levy of 836 mills applied to a property with a taxable value of $4,000 results in a property tax of 836/1000 x $4,000 = $3,344. Thus, higher mill levies result in higher property taxes for properties of equal value. In particular, residents of Missoula pay higher taxes on properties of equal value because Missoula s mill levies are higher. 4 The taxable value of residential and commercial properties is determined by another formula: Taxable Value = Appraised Value x Tax Rate State law requires appraised value to be market value, which is the value at which property would change hands between a willing buyer and a willing seller when both have reasonable knowledge of the relevant facts and neither is under any compulsion to buy or sell. In practice, the appraised values of residential properties are determined by sales prices of comparable properties, based on location, age, square footage, etc. Other types of property are appraised by other means. For example, commercial property is appraised by capitalization of rental income, and agricultural and forest properties are appraised by capitalization of income in current use. The Tax Rate for 2016 on Residential is 1.35%. 5 For example, a residential property with an appraised value of $300,000 would have a Taxable Value of $4,050. Taxable Value = $300,000 x.0135 = $4,050 The Tax Rate for Commercial Property is 1.4 times the rate for Residential property, or 1.89%. For example, a commercial property with an appraised value of $750,000 would have a Taxable Value of $14,175. Taxable Value = $750,000 x.0189 = $14,175 3. Why Are Mill Levies Higher in Missoula? There are several possible reasons why mill levies are higher in Missoula. City and county spending may be higher, requiring more taxes to pay for the spending. Another possible reason is that the property tax base may be smaller in Missoula, requiring a higher mill levy to raise the same amount of revenue. In addition, Missoula local governments may receive less in non- 4 This report focuses on primarily on residential property. However, many of the same ideas apply to business property. See for example the Montana Policy Institute Report, How Business Friendly are Montana s 25 Largest Cities, which ranks Business Tax Burden by the same criterion used here: mill levies. http://www.montanapolicy.org/2012/10/business-friendly-city-rankings/ 5 Tax Years correspond to calendar years, i.e. January to December. Fiscal Years run from July 1 to June 30 and are designated by the second year. Property owners typically receive bills during the fall of a tax year and make two payments, one during November and the other in May of the following calendar year. Thus Tax Year 2015 property tax bills are paid in Fiscal Year 2016.

Are Missoula s Property Taxes High? Page 6 property tax revenues like grants or transfers from the State and Federal governments. This last possibility is beyond the scope of this study. Total appropriated funds are a measure of government spending. Total appropriated funds include the General Fund and many other funds that cities may utilize, including Library Fund, Planning Fund, Comprehensive Insurance, Health Insurance, Public Employee Retirement System (PERS), Fire Fund, Police Retirement, Bond/Interest and Miscellaneous other tax supported funds. Fee-based services such as water and sewer are not included. Figure 3 displays total appropriated funds per person for Missoula and the other large cities in Montana. Threeyear averages are used to smooth year-to-year fluctuations in the data. Missoula s appropriated funds are the highest among comparable cities. Spending by this measure is about 17 percent above average. Thus, higher City of Missoula spending contributes to higher tax rates. Figure 3. Figure 4 displays total appropriated funds per person for Missoula and the comparison counties. Total appropriated funds by counties include an even longer list of fund categories: General Fund, Public Safety, Road Fund, District Court, Bridge Fund, Weed Fund, Fair Fund, Library Fund, Extension Fund, Airport Fund, Health/Sanitation, Mental Health, Planning Fund, Hospital Fund, Bond/Interest, Senior Citizens, Comprehensive Insurance, Health Insurance, PERS, Ambulance Fund, Museum Fund, and Miscellaneous other tax supported funds. Total appropriated funds by Missoula County are the highest among the large Montana counties. Spending is about 28 percent above the six-county average.

Are Missoula s Property Taxes High? Page 7 Figure 4. Figure 5 displays the mill value per person a measure of the tax base for the large Montana cities. The mill value per person is the number of dollars per person that is raised by levying one mill. Larger mill values indicate a larger tax base, so the same amount of revenue can be raised with a lower mill levy. Conversely, a lower mill value implies that a higher mill levy is required to raise an equal amount of revenue. Bozeman has the largest tax base by this measure, and Great Falls the lowest. The City of Missoula s tax base is about 9 percent below the six-city average, therefore contributing to higher mill levies. Figure 5.

Are Missoula s Property Taxes High? Page 8 Figure 6 shows mill values per person for counties. The highest mill values are in Flathead and Gallatin counties, and the lowest is in Cascade County. Missoula County s mill value is about 13 percent below average, again contributing to higher mill levies. One reason that Missoula County s mill value is below average is that Missoula has relatively little industrial property: Classes 5, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13 and 14 make up 17 percent of the tax base versus 26 percent in the six-county average. Put differently, residential and commercial property (Class 4) makes up 83 percent of the tax base in Missoula County versus 74 percent in the six-county average. 6 Thus, most of the property tax burden is borne by residential and commercial property. Figure 6. Summarizing this section, Missoula s city and county mill levies are higher than average both because spending is higher than average, and because the tax base is lower than average. 6 Data are for tax year 2012. Source: Private communication with Montana Department of Revenue.

Are Missoula s Property Taxes High? Page 9 3. Comparison with Other States Table 2 compares Montana residential property taxes with those in other states. Specifically, it compares Effective Property Tax rates in the largest cities in several western states and national averages. Effective property tax rates are the dollar value of property taxes divided by the market value of a property. Effective property tax rates are used for cross-state comparisons, because the property tax structures differ so much between the states that concepts like mill levies have very different meanings depending on the state. The effective property tax rate in Billings is estimated to be about 0.7 percent, which is below the national and regional averages. Billings effective rate ranks 45 th highest (or 5 th lowest) in the country. Missoula s mill rates are about 18% higher than Billings. This suggests that effective property tax rates in Missoula are about 0.85%. That would rank Missoula somewhere between 31th and 36 th highest in this table, and below the regional and national averages. Table 2 Effective Property Tax Rates Residential Property State/Metropolitan Area Median Home Price Tax Rank Effective Tax Rate Rank California, Los Angeles Colorado, Denver Idaho, Boise Montana, Billings* Nevada, Las Vegas North Dakota, Fargo Oregon, Portland South Dakota, Sioux Falls Utah, Salt Lake City Washington, Seattle Wyoming, Cheyenne* 339,900 234,700 140,100 175,300 142,300 141,600 238,500 141,400 207,300 307,300 173,600 4,227 1,218 1,171 1,264 1,622 2,225 2,720 1,909 1,674 2,331 1,124 10 46 47 45 38 26 17 30 37 21 48 1.244% 0.519% 0.836% 0.721% 1.140% 1.571% 1.141% 1.350% 0.808% 0.759% 0.648% 27 52 38 45 32 18 31 21 41 42 48 U.S. Average Region Average 205,749 203,818 2,613 1,953 1.34% 0.98% Source: Montana Taxpayers Association, Montana Taxes: Comparisons with Other States (revised 3/17).

Are Missoula s Property Taxes High? Page 10 4. Property Taxes over Two Decades This section describes how property taxes have changed over the last two decades. Specifically, we consider whether mill levies have risen, how mill values have changed, and whether property taxes have kept up with inflation and growth in population and income. Figure 7 displays total mills levied by cities in 1991-93 and 2013-13. 7 Two points are noteworthy. First, Missoula s mill levy was the highest among the cities in both the earlier and later periods. In other words, relatively high property taxes are not a new phenomenon in Missoula. Second, mill levies have increased a great deal in all cities. Mill levies doubled in Billings, Great Falls and Helena. Missoula s increase was a smaller 85 percent. Bozeman had the lowest percentage increase: 44 percent. Figure 7. 7 Most mills levied by local governments are subject to limits set by the Montana Legislature and set forth in 15-10- 240 MCA. Specifically, a governmental entity that is authorized to impose mills may impose a mill levy sufficient to generate the amount of property taxes actually assessed in the prior year plus one-half of the average rate of inflation for the prior 3 years. Various exceptions exist, including funding employee health insurance. In addition, citizens may vote to increase mill levies to finance bonds for various projects, e.g. Missoula s Aquatics Bond. http://leg.mt.gov/bills/mca/15/10/15-10-420.htm

Are Missoula s Property Taxes High? Page 11 Figure 8 displays the mill levy data for counties. 8 Property taxes levied by Missoula County were 98 mills in the early 1990s. They have nearly doubled to 191 mills in recent years, the second highest among the comparison counties. As with the city levies, Missoula is not alone: mill levies have increased a great deal in all counties. Figure 8. 8 These data differ from those in Figure 1 and Table 1, because they are for different years and because they include county mills which are not levied within most cities, including county road mills. For example, the data in Figure 7 include 23 mills levied by Missoula County which are not levied within the City of Missoula and are not included in Figure 1 and Table 1. They are included here because of the difficulty of excluding them from the data for the earlier years (1991-93).

Are Missoula s Property Taxes High? Page 12 One reason that mill levies have increased is that tax bases have not increased as fast as inflation and population growth. Thus, higher mill levies are required just to pay for the same level of services. Figure 9 displays the value of a mill per person, adjusted for inflation, for the major cities. For example, one mill levied in the City of Missoula in 1991-93 raised an average of $2.08 per person per year, measured in dollars of 2015 purchasing power. One mill levied in 2013-15 raised an average of $1.56 per person per year, a decrease of 25 percent. All of the cities suffered declines in the real value of a mill per person, except Bozeman. The largest percentage decline was in Billings 33 percent. Figure 9. All counties except Gallatin also experienced declines in real mill value per person. The decline in Missoula County was 28 percent, close to Yellowstone County s decline of 29 percent.

Are Missoula s Property Taxes High? Page 13 Figure 10. Why did the value of a mill fail to keep up with population growth and inflation? Weren t property values rising and new property being added to the tax base, sometimes at very rapid rates? The short answer is that the Montana Legislature repeatedly reduced Taxable Values as a percentage of Market Values. 9 These actions were taken to offset the dramatic rise in property values that occurred during the real estate boom of the 1990s and first half of the 2000s. If no adjustments had been made, considerable shifting among different types of property would have occurred. However, because these actions offset essentially all of the increases in market value including half of general inflation local governments could not continue to raise the same amount of revenue in real terms without increasing tax rates. So, with rising mill levies but declining real mill values, what happened to real property taxes? The answer, as displayed in Figures 11 and 12, is that property taxes went up. City of Missoula property taxes, adjusted for inflation, increased from $273 per person to $380, or 39 percent. The largest percentage increase was in Helena, from $182 to $327, or 80 percent. Missoula taxes per person were the highest among the comparison cities in both the earlier and more recent periods. 9 See Montana Department of Revenue, Biennial Report 2014-16, for a fuller description.

Are Missoula s Property Taxes High? Page 14 Figure 11. The results are similar at the county level. Missoula County property taxes, adjusted for inflation, increased from $242 to $337 per person, or 39 percent. The largest percentage increases were in Lewis and Clark (85 percent) and Gallatin (74 percent) counties. By this measure (which includes county road taxes not levied within cities), Missoula County s property tax burden was the second highest among the comparison counties in 1991-93 and third highest in 2013-15. Figure 12.

Are Missoula s Property Taxes High? Page 15 Another way to present property taxes is as a percentage of personal income. Personal income is a broad measure of ability to pay which includes not only wage and salary income, but also employer provided benefits such as health insurance and retirement contributions, selfemployment income, capital income (rents, dividends, interest), and transfer payments such as Social Security benefits. Missoula s personal income per person of $38,489 is the lowest among the comparison counties, slightly below Flathead County ($38,977), while the highest is in Yellowstone County ($43,799). Real (inflation-adjusted) personal income per capita rose significantly in the last two decades in all counties (Figure 13). In Missoula real personal income per person rose by 37 percent. Figure 13. Figures 14 and 15 display property taxes as a percentage of income for these cities and counties. City property taxes rose as a percentage of income in all the major cities. 10 The largest change was in Helena, where property taxes rose from 0.61% of income to 0.77%. The growth in City of Missoula property taxes was very moderate - from 0.98% of income to 0.99% - but Missoula had the highest property taxes in both the earlier and recent periods. 10 Source: US Bureau of Economic Analysis. Data on income per person are not available at the city level, so the county data are used for both counties and their corresponding cities. For example, income per person for Gallatin County is also used for Bozeman.

Are Missoula s Property Taxes High? Page 16 Figure 14. The results at the county level (Figure 15) are broadly similar. The largest percentage-point increase occurred in Lewis and Clark County, while Missoula s increase was from 0.86% of income to 0.88%. In recent years, Missoula County s property taxes have been third highest among these counties when expressed as a percentage of income. Figure 15.

Are Missoula s Property Taxes High? Page 17 5. Conclusions, Cautions and Caveats Residents of Missoula pay the highest property tax rates among the major cities in Montana (Billings, Bozeman, Butte, Great Falls, Helena, Kalispell, and Missoula). Property tax rates also known as mill levies in Missoula are about 15 percent higher than the average of the seven cities. Missoula s mill levies are higher, because both the county and city mill levies are higher than average. Education levies are close to average. Multiple factors contribute to high mill levies. One is government spending: both Missoula County and City of Missoula spending per person are the highest among the comparison communities. A relatively low tax base also contributes to higher mill levies: Missoula s city and county tax bases are 9-13 percent below the average of the comparison governments. Comparisons with other states are more difficult, because property tax systems and property values differ so much across states. However, the evidence indicates that Montana residential property taxes are below national averages in both dollar terms and as a percentage of property value. Property tax mill levies have increased dramatically since the early 1990s in all the major cities and counties in Montana. City of Missoula mill levies increased 85 percent, and Missoula County levies increased 95 percent. One reason for the increases is that the property tax base failed to keep up with inflation, as legislative changes reduced taxable values. In dollar terms, property taxes increased on a per person basis even after accounting for inflation, while they rose slightly as a percentage of income. The impact of property taxes differs from individual to individual, depending on property value and appraisal, the exact jurisdictions involved (city, county, school district, special districts, etc.), and on individual circumstances. Thus, some individuals may have seen their property taxes increasing far faster than their incomes, while others saw declines. This report does not address this diversity of individual experiences, instead focusing on the broad trends represented by mill levies, mill value, inflation and average income. High property taxes in Missoula do not necessarily imply they are too high. Although no one enjoys paying property taxes, they are a key element in financing government services. In addition, some mill levies require voter approval at the ballot box. For example, in 2013 Missoula voters approved an increase in the mill levy for the Urban Transportation District. Even levies not requiring voter approval so-called permissive levies and their associated spending require approval by elected officials who must ultimately answer to the electorate. At the same time, higher taxes reduce disposable income of property owners and can adversely affect residential and business location decisions and job creation. Thus, whether Missoula s property taxes are too high depends on a balancing of the costs (taxes) and benefits of the services provided. This report relies largely on published data generously provided by the Montana Taxpayers Association and the Local Government Center at Montana State University in Bozeman. These organizations rely in turn on data from the Montana Department of Revenue. The most recent published data available is from Tax Year 2016 (Fiscal Year 2017). Property taxes continue to change over time, so the data in this report do not fully reflect current conditions in January, 2018.