Supreme Court rules accumulated losses of amalgamating company to be set off after reducing interest waiver benefit

Similar documents
EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Delhi Tribunal rules on advertisement and promotion expenses involving use of trademarks as not royalty.

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

EY Tax Alert. J&K HC rules that contract receipts of a JV result in diversion of income to JV members; receipt not an income of the JV

MoF issues Notifications and Circular for services relating to transportation of goods by vessel

EY PAS Alert. Finance bill proposes tax on long-term gains arising on sale of listed equity shares Impact on employee stock option plans

EY Tax Alert Delhi High Court upholds weighted R&D deduction for recognized inhouse R&D facility from the date prior to recognition and approval

EY Alert. Kerala High Court quashes 2014 notification amending the Employees Pension Scheme, 1995

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Chennai Tribunal upholds salary taxation of SARs benefits received from foreign parent of employer.

EY Tax Alert. Mumbai Tribunal rules conversion of compulsory convertible preference shares into equity shares is not transfer.

Bombay HC upholds non-taxability of deferred consideration on transfer of shares in the absence of accrual

EY Tax Alert. Supreme Court reaffirms constitutional validity of Aadhaar PAN linking requirement. Executive summary

Pune Tribunal upholds tax deductibility of MTM exchange fluctuation loss on forex loan borrowed to reduce interest cost and hedge export receivables

EY Tax Alert. Supreme Court upholds lease equalization adjustment in finance lease as per the ICAI Guidance Note for tax purposes.

EY Tax Alert. Delhi Tribunal rules guarantee fee income received by foreign parent from Indian subsidiary is taxable in India.

EY PAS Alert. Executive summary. Press release dated 27 February

HC denies refund of SAD paid on import of coil sheets sold after corrugation as proflex roof

EY Tax Alert. Supreme Court negates claim for 100% deduction for fresh five years of new units undertaking substantial expansion.

Amendments at enactment stage of Finance Bill, 2017

Delhi Tribunal rules income of non-resident that is not attributable to PE in India shall still be taxable in India as FTS

EY Tax Alert. Central Government modifies conditions for availing exemption from angel tax provision. Executive summary

EY Tax Alert Bangalore Tribunal rules on constitution of service PE for services rendered virtually as well as physically

EY Tax Alert. Conversion of company into LLP under LLP Act results in transfer subject to capital gains tax. Executive summary

Clarifications on Indirect transfer provisions under the Incometax Act, 1961

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

EY Tax Alert. Full Bench of Karnataka HC rules incidental interest income earned by Taxpayer is eligible for export incentive scheme deduction

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. SC settles certain controversies on profit-linked deduction for export units. 21 December 2016

This Tax Alert provides highlights of the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2017 ( Bill ) introduced in the Lok Sabha on 31 March 2017.

Indian Equalization Levy on digital services to be effective from 1 June 2016, administrative rules notified

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Supreme Court rules on characterization of property rental income as income from house property.

EY Tax Alert Indian tax administration issues final rules on certain aspects for determining buy-back tax in India Executive summary

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. CBDT provides clarifications on Direct Tax Dispute Resolution Scheme, September 2016

and Master File implementation

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

Control premium in India. Ernst & Young LLP July 2017

EY Tax Alert Central Board of Direct Taxes issues final rules prescribing methodology for determining fair market value of unquoted shares

EY Tax Alert. CBEC releases four Rules approved by GST Council and issues Notifications under Central and Integrated GST.

GST: How it will impact advertising budgets? June 2017

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

Tax Alert Key amendments at enactment stage of Finance Bill, 2018

CBDT introduces form for employee investment declarations and extends due date for quarterly withholding statements

AAR rules that provision of business support services to US affiliate are naturally bundled and are not intermediary services

EY Regulatory Alert. Executive summary. SEBI releases Discussion Paper on review of framework for Institutional Trading

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

Amendments to the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Alternative Investment Funds) Regulations, Executive summary

EY India Defence EY s point of view on amended Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) Policy on Defence Sector

CBEC releases draft rules on Assessment and Audit under GST and E-Way Bill. The key highlights of the rules are as under:

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Bangalore Tribunal rules on deductibility of employee share reward discount cross-charged by foreign parent company

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

CBDT releases fifth round of FAQs on Income Declaration Scheme, 2016

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

Guidance Note on FATCA and CRS dated 30 November Key clarifications

Mumbai Tribunal rules reimbursement of expenses on secondment of employees not FTS

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

Delhi Tribunal rules on indirect transfer of shares on transaction undertaken in 2006

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Supreme Court rules on year of deductibility of debenture interest paid upfront. 26 March 2015

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Mumbai Tribunal rules on legality and taxability of certain gift transactions by corporates.

CBDT releases second round of FAQs on Income Declaration Scheme, 2016

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

EY Tax Alert. Mumbai Tribunal rules intercompany

EY India Real Estate EY s point of view on Amended Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) Policy on Construction Development Sector

Karnataka High Court rules that implementation of customized software is a service and cannot be subject to VAT

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

CBDT amends rules relating to furnishing information in respect of payments to nonresidents

This Tax Alert summarizes the key indirect tax proposals in the Maharashtra State Budget for the financial year

EY Tax Alert Central Government notifies the transactions of listed equity shares not eligible for Long Term capital gains exemption

Operational, prudential and reporting norms for Alternative Investment Funds. Executive summary

Mumbai Tribunal rules charterer includes slot charter arrangement for availing treaty benefit under Article 8 of India Malaysia DTAA

EY Tax Alert. CBEC issues clarifications on exports-related refund issues. Executive summary

Kerala HC upholds the constitutional validity of levy of Service tax on admission and access to entertainment event & amusement facilities

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. CBDT sets up a Committee to deal with retroactive indirect transfer taxation. 1 September 2014

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

Mumbai Tribunal rules on DAPE in case of marketing and distribution activities carried out by an Indian branch for group companies

Bombay HC rules that appropriate State for levy and collection of CST is the State from where movement of goods commences

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Supreme Court rules on scope of statutory dues allowable as deduction on actual payment.

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

Government of India amends Income Computation and Disclosure Standards and also defers them by one year to tax year

CBDT revises rules relating to furnishing information in respect of payments to nonresidents

Applying Ind AS 115 Automotive: The new revenue recognition standard

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Mumbai Tribunal rules write-down of investment loss allowable if a direct and proximate nexus exists with a business

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. CBDT notifies guidelines for onshore management of offshore funds. 17 March 2016

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Supreme Court upholds initiation of prosecution for failure to file return. 3 February 2014

EY Regulatory Alert. Executive summary

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Delhi HC rules payment towards live telecast is not royalty. 1 December 2014

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Third Protocol amending the India-Singapore tax treaty signed. 31 December 2016

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Supreme Court upholds disallowance of expenditure incurred in relation to exempt dividend income.

Reserve Bank of India releases draft guidelines for on tap licensing of Universal Banks in the private sector

High Court rules that in-transit sale in turnkey contracts not eligible for exemption under Section 6(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. CBDT notifies ITR Forms for Company/ Firms/ LLP/ Trusts and others. 05 August 2015 October 2014

EY Regulatory Alert. Executive summary

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

Transfer pricing for Specified Domestic Transactions

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

Measuring the tax cost of investment in India. Through estimation of marginal effective tax rates (METRs)

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

Reserve Bank of India releases final guidelines for on tap licensing of Universal Banks in the private sector

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Protocol signed on 10 May 2016 to amend the 1982 India- Mauritius tax treaty. 12 May 2016

Transcription:

19 April 2017 EY Tax Alert Supreme Court rules accumulated losses of amalgamating company to be set off after reducing interest waiver benefit Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments and changes in legislation that affect Indian businesses. They act as technical summaries to keep you on top of the latest tax issues. For more information, please contact your EY advisor. This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) in the case of McDowell & Company Ltd. [1] (Taxpayer), for tax year 1982-83, in the context of the quantum of benefit of accumulated losses of the amalgamating company available to the amalgamated company. Prior to the amendment to the Indian Tax Laws (ITL) by Finance Act, 1992, with effect from tax year 1992-93, there was no provision in the extant ITL to tax benefit obtained by an amalgamated company in respect of remission of trading liability of the amalgamating company. Despite the absence of such a provision, the SC held that if the amalgamated company is availing the benefit of set off of accumulated losses of the amalgamating company, in accordance with specific provisions of the ITL, the quantum of such benefit needs to be reduced by the value of the benefit obtained in respect of remission of trading liability. Such adjustment is necessary to ensure that the benefit of set off of accumulated losses of the amalgamating company is restricted to the actual accumulated losses. [1] [Civil Appeal No. 3893 of 2006 [TS 147-SC-2017]

Background The ITL provides for clawback of deduction allowed in the past years in respect of loss, expenditure or trading liability if the taxpayer obtains any benefit in cash or any other mode or through remission or cessation of the trading liability. Prior to the amendment to the ITL by the Finance Act, 1992, with effect from tax year 1992-93, there was no provision in the extant ITL to tax benefit obtained by an amalgamated company in respect of remission of trading liability of the amalgamating company. The ITL also provides for transition of business loss and unabsorbed depreciation of the amalgamating company to the amalgamated company, subject to compliance of certain conditions which, during tax year 1982-83, included obtaining approval/declaration of the Central Government. Facts Through a scheme of amalgamation with effect from 1 April 1977, which was sanctioned in tax year 1982-83, the Taxpayer took over a sick company which had accumulated losses and outstanding dues to banks/financial institutions. As part of the proceedings for rehabilitation of the sick company through said amalgamation, the lenders waived off unpaid interest accrued till 1 April 1977. The Taxpayer, as the amalgamated company, became entitled to carry forward and set off business loss and unabsorbed depreciation of the sick amalgamating company in tax year 1982-83.The business loss included unpaid interest to lenders till 1 April 1977, which was subsequently waived by the lenders. The Taxpayer sought to set off the business loss of the sick company, without reducing the waived amount of unpaid interest, on the basis that the extant clawback provision did not cover the benefit obtained by the amalgamated company in respect of any deduction granted to the amalgamating company, whereas the benefit of transition of business loss was claimed as per the statutory right available to the Taxpayer. The Taxpayer relied on an earlier SC ruling in the case of Saraswati Industrial Syndicate Ltd. v. CIT [2] (Saraswati Industrial ruling) which had held that, in order to attract liability under the clawback provision, the identity of the taxpayer in the earlier year in which the deduction had been granted in relation to a trading liability and in the subsequent year in which the benefit was derived, must be the same. The provision is not attracted if there is any change in the identity of the person. When two companies amalgamate, the amalgamating company loses its corporate entity status, though its rights and liabilities are determined as per the scheme of amalgamation. Thus, in the case of amalgamation, the benefit of waiver derived by the amalgamated company in respect of trading liability allowed to the amalgamating company cannot be taxed in the hands of the amalgamated company under this provision. The Tax Authority did not accept the Taxpayer s claim and reduced the benefit of transition of business loss by the amount of the benefit of waiver of unpaid interest, which was upheld by the First Appellate Authority. On further appeal by the Taxpayer, the Tribunal ruled in the Taxpayer s favour. The Tax Authority sought a reference of the question of law to the Karnataka High Court (HC) from the Tribunal which was rejected by the Tribunal, as also the HC. On further appeal by the Tax Authority, the SC directed the Tribunal to refer the question of law to the HC. On such reference, the HC overruled the Tribunal s ruling and ruled in favor of the Tax Authority The Taxpayer appealed further to the SC. [2] [182 ITR 212]

Issue before the SC Whether the quantum of business loss transitioned to the amalgamated company needs to be reduced by the benefit obtained by the amalgamated company in respect of waiver of unpaid interest of the amalgamating company. SC s ruling By virtue of loss, according to the transition provision, the losses suffered by the amalgamating company are treated as losses of the amalgamated company. In such a case, it would not be correct for the amalgamated company to take advantage of losses suffered by the amalgamating company but ignore the benefit accrued in respect of waiver of unpaid dues of the amalgamating company. The adjustment is necessary in order to see that the benefit is restricted to the actual accumulated losses. The SC ruled in the Tax Authority s favor and held that the quantum of business loss transitioned to the amalgamated company needs to be reduced by the benefit obtained by the amalgamated company in respect of waiver of unpaid interest of the amalgamating company, for the following reasons: It is true that, as held in the Saraswati Industrial ruling, the amalgamating company loses its existence and, hence, as per extant law, the benefit obtained by the amalgamated company in respect of waiver of trading liability of the amalgamating company cannot be taxed under the clawback provision. But, the Saraswati Industrial ruling was concerned with the clawback provision, whereas the dispute in the present case concerns the provision relating to transition of business loss of the amalgamating company to the amalgamated company. Hence, the principle of the Saraswati Industrial ruling is not applicable in the instant case. The rights of the amalgamating company are determined in terms of the scheme of amalgamation and the benefit of waiver of interest had accrued after the amalgamating company ceased to exist. It was, in fact, availed of by the amalgamated company. It is important to note that the amalgamated company was allowed to set off the accumulated losses of the amalgamating company. While computing such losses, the benefit obtained by the amalgamated company has to be adjusted and only net losses can be allowed to be set off by the amalgamated company. Comments It may be noted that this SC ruling pertains to tax year 1982-83 during which the extant clawback provision did not permit taxation of the benefit of waiver in the hands of the amalgamated company in respect of trading liability incurred by the amalgamating company. This was addressed by a subsequent amendment, effective from tax year 1992-93, in terms of which the successor entity is made liable to tax in respect of waiver of trading liabilities incurred by the predecessor entity. The ratio of the present SC ruling appears to be that the amalgamated company cannot claim duplicated benefit of transition of business loss of the amalgamating company, without reducing the benefit obtained by the amalgamated company in respect of waiver of trading liability of the amalgamating company, despite the absence of a specific provision to tax such benefit in the hands of the amalgamated company.

Considering that the amended law itself has addressed the issue by making the benefit of waiver taxable in the hands of the amalgamated company, the quantum of losses to be transitioned to the amalgamated company need not be reduced by the amount of waiver. Else, it may result in duplicated taxation of the benefit in the hands of the amalgamated company.

Our offices Ahmedabad 2nd floor, Shivalik Ishaan Near C.N. Vidhyalaya Ambawadi Ahmedabad - 380 015 Tel: + 91 79 6608 3800 Fax: + 91 79 6608 3900 Bengaluru 6th, 12th & 13th floor UB City, Canberra Block No.24 Vittal Mallya Road Bengaluru - 560 001 Tel: + 91 80 4027 5000 + 91 80 6727 5000 + 91 80 2224 0696 Fax: + 91 80 2210 6000 Ground Floor, A wing Divyasree Chambers # 11, O Shaughnessy Road Langford Gardens Bengaluru - 560 025 Tel: +91 80 6727 5000 Fax: +91 80 2222 9914 Chandigarh 1st Floor, SCO: 166-167 Sector 9-C, Madhya Marg Chandigarh - 160 009 Tel: +91 172 331 7800 Fax: +91 172 331 7888 Chennai Tidel Park, 6th & 7th Floor A Block (Module 601,701-702) No.4, Rajiv Gandhi Salai Taramani, Chennai - 600 113 Tel: + 91 44 6654 8100 Fax: + 91 44 2254 0120 Delhi NCR Golf View Corporate Tower B Sector 42, Sector Road Gurgaon - 122 002 Tel: + 91 124 464 4000 Fax: + 91 124 464 4050 3rd & 6th Floor, Worldmark-1 IGI Airport Hospitality District Aerocity, New Delhi - 110 037 Tel: + 91 11 6671 8000 Fax + 91 11 6671 9999 Hyderabad Oval Office, 18, ilabs Centre Hitech City, Madhapur Hyderabad - 500 081 Tel: + 91 40 6736 2000 Fax: + 91 40 6736 2200 Jamshedpur 1st Floor, Shantiniketan Building Holding No. 1, SB Shop Area Bistupur, Jamshedpur 831 001 Tel: +91 657 663 1000 BSNL: +91 657 223 0441 Kochi 9th Floor, ABAD Nucleus NH-49, Maradu PO Kochi - 682 304 Tel: + 91 484 304 4000 Fax: + 91 484 270 5393 Kolkata 22 Camac Street 3rd Floor, Block C Kolkata - 700 016 Tel: + 91 33 6615 3400 Fax: + 91 33 2281 7750 Mumbai 14th Floor, The Ruby 29 Senapati Bapat Marg Dadar (W), Mumbai - 400 028 Tel: + 91 22 6192 0000 Fax: + 91 22 6192 1000 5th Floor, Block B-2 Nirlon Knowledge Park Off. Western Express Highway Goregaon (E) Mumbai - 400 063 Tel: + 91 22 6192 0000 Fax: + 91 22 6192 3000 Pune C-401, 4th floor Panchshil Tech Park Yerwada (Near Don Bosco School) Pune - 411 006 Tel: + 91 20 6603 6000 Fax: + 91 20 6601 5900 Ernst & Young LLP EY Assurance Tax Transactions Advisory About EY EY is a global leader in assurance, tax, transaction and advisory services. The insights and quality services we deliver help build trust and confidence in the capital markets and in economies the world over. We develop outstanding leaders who team to deliver on our promises to all of our stakeholders. In so doing, we play a critical role in building a better working world for our people, for our clients and for our communities. EY refers to the global organization and may refer to one or more of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients. For more information about our organization, please visit ey.com. Ernst & Young LLP is one of the Indian client serving member firms of EYGM Limited. For more information about our organization, please visit www.ey.com/in. Ernst & Young LLP is a Limited Liability Partnership, registered under the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 in India, having its registered office at 22 Camac Street, 3rd Floor, Block C, Kolkata 700016. 2017 Ernst & Young LLP. Published in India. All Rights Reserved. ED None This publication contains information in summary form and is therefore intended for general guidance only. It is not intended to be a substitute for detailed research or the exercise of professional judgment. Neither Ernst & Young LLP nor any other member of the global Ernst & Young organization can accept any responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any material in this publication. On any specific matter, reference should be made to the appropriate advisor. 4th & 5th Floor, Plot No 2B Tower 2, Sector 126 NOIDA - 201 304 Gautam Budh Nagar, U.P. Tel: + 91 120 671 7000 Fax: + 91 120 671 7171 EY refers to global organization, and/or one or more of the independent member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited Join India Tax Insights from EY on