U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION. Futures Contract Design in Thinly Traded Markets

Similar documents
Live Cattle Delivery Manual Relating to Chapter 101

Commodity Futures with Thinly Traded Cash Markets: The Case of Live Cattle

CHAPTER 7 DELIVERY FACILITIES AND PROCEDURES

Answer each of the following questions by circling True or False (2 points each).

Day 2 (Notice Day) Prior to open of trade, the clearinghouse matches the seller with the oldest long position and notifies both parties.

Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics

Live Cattle Marketing Committee Minutes Denver, CO Hyatt Regency, Capitol Ballroom 4 July 14, :15 AM 12:30 PM

Futures and Options Live Cattle Feeder Cattle. Tim Petry Livestock Marketing Economist NDSU Extension

Livestock Market Terms, Part II

ECON 337 Agricultural Marketing. Spring Exam I. Due April 16, Start of Lab (or before)

Futures and Options Live Cattle Feeder Cattle. Tim Petry Livestock Marketing Economist NDSU Extension Service

Livestock Risk Protection

Introduction to Futures Markets

Hedging and Basis Considerations For Feeder Cattle Livestock Risk Protection Insurance

Livestock Risk Protection (LRP)

The Effectiveness of LRP Insurance for Feeder Cattle Management

Fundamentals of Futures Contracts and Hedging. Overview of discussion. Fundamentals of the hedge 10/6/2016

Western Livestock Price Insurance Program (WLPIP) June 9, 2014 SSGA AGM & Convention

Introduction to Futures & Options Markets for Livestock

Hog Marketing Practices and Competition Questions

Basis Data for Forward Pricing Feeder Cattle: Oregon-Washington; Shasta, California; Billings, Montana

Livestock Risk Protection Insurance (LRP): How It Works for Feeder Cattle

TRADING THE CATTLE AND HOG CRUSH SPREADS

The Role of Market Prices by

Basis Data for Forward Pricing Live Beef Cattle in Oregon-Washington

Overview. What is LRP? LRP policy Calculate your premiums Issues with LRP Results Conclusion/Recommendations

Cattle Market And Controversy

Average Local Bases fur An Aggregation of Cattle Markets in Ohio. Stephen Ott and E. Dean Baldwin. Introduction

The Application of the Tokyo Communiqué to Exchange- Traded Financial Derivatives Contracts

Buying Hedge with Futures

Lecture 3. Futures operation

Higher Beef Prices with Higher Prices to Come

HEDGING WITH FUTURES. Understanding Price Risk

Amendments to Spot Call Butter Contract

Appendix 4. Glossary

Dairy Farm Operating Trends

Dairy Farm Operating Trends

Beef Industry Risk Management: Alternatives and Resources for Producers

An Assessment of the Reliability of CanFax Reported Negotiated Fed Cattle Transactions and Market Prices

EC Hedging and Basis Considerations for Swine Livestock Risk Protection Insurance

Futures, Options, LRP Compared

Fed Cattle Basis: An Updated Overview of Concepts and Applications

More information on other ways of forward contracting hogs is available in the module Hog Market Contracting.

Economic Ranch Tools & Risk Management

Livestock Risk Protection (LRP) A New Price Risk Management Tool for Lamb Producers

Agriculture & Natural Resources

Econiimetric Analysis of Fed Cattle Procurement in the Texas Panhandle*

Captive Supplies and the Spot Market Price of Fed Cattle: The Plant-Level Relationship

By Tom Leffler and Larry Glenn. 14- Day RSI. 10-Day Moving Avg. Today's Low

U.S. Market Hog Sales, *

Western Livestock Price Insurance Program WEB HELP GUIDE

Dairy Farm Operating Trends

Chapter 14B Mini-Sized Wheat Futures

CFTC Proposed Rule on Energy Markets Position Limits and Hedge Exemptions

CFTC Update: High-Frequency Trading, Customer Protection, & Position Limits

Cross Hedging Agricultural Commodities

Livestock Insurance Alternatives For Risk Management February 15 to March 6, 2007 Dr. Darrell R. Mark Price Change ($/cwt) 5.

Trading Rules of Dalian Commodity Exchange

The Economics of ARC vs. PLC

Tim Petry Livestock Economist Agribusiness and Applied Economics.

ECON 337 Agricultural Marketing Spring Exam I. Answer each of the following questions by circling True or False (2 point each).

Definitions of Marketing Terms

USING RISK MANAGEMENT TOOLS: A LIVESTOCK APPLICATION

Financing hog operations

Table of Contents. Introduction

AGRICULTURAL TRADE OPTIONS WHAT AGRICULTURAL PRODUCERS NEED TO KNOW. Prepared by. Commodity Futures Trading Commission Division of Economic Analysis

Proposed Rule-Making in Energy Markets

MARKET SURVEILLANCE RULE ENFORCEMENT REVIEW OF THE NEW YORK MERCANTILE EXCHANGE AND THE COMMODITY EXCHANGE

Q1. Do you wish for your answers to be entered into the AAEA Extension Forecasting competition? Yes No

A Practical Examination of the Regulatory Oversight of Energy Marketing & Trading Companies in the United States

CME Cattle Market Volatility

Chapter 10B Mini-Sized Corn Futures

What are the institutions related to futures, options, and other (commodity) markets?

Investment Management Alert

Non-Convergence of CME Hard Red Winter Wheat Futures and the Impact of Excessive Grain Inventories in Kansas

Use of Futures and Options in a Retained Ownership Program

A View From the Street

NOTICE. Futures. Summary. commencing with the. NYSE Liffe U.S. March 11, Rule Chapter 121. for sellers and. Bonds. 1.3 The Treasury.

Fats vs. Feeders, Off to a Decent Start!

CONTRACTS: LEARNING FROM THE EXPERIENCE OF DIFFICULT ECONOMIC TIMES IOWA PORK CONGRESS

All Approved Insurance Providers All Risk Management Agency Field Offices All Other Interested Parties

Recent Developments in South Dakota's Hog Market

Pursuant to Section 19(b)(7) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ( Act ), 1 notice is

June 2018 Monthly Commodity Market Overview Newsletter. Stock Index Futures. By the ADMIS Research Team

CLIENT UPDATE PROPOSED CFTC RULES ON POSITION LIMITS

Derivatives Regulation Regulation of financial derivatives in the US code

TIMELY INFORMATION Agriculture & Natural Resources

New Paradigms in Marketing: Are Speculators or the Fundamentals Driving Prices? Scott H. Irwin

Options Trading in Agricultural Commodities

Pricing Issues in Dairy Futures Markets. T. Randall Fortenbery

The new EU regulatory framework for commodity derivatives & MiFiD II/MiFIR implementation Brussels, 20 September 2017

More on Commodity Prices, Volatility and Risk: Is the Corn Market Becoming Riskier?

TERMS OF REFERENCE TRANSFORMATION OF THE TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO POSTAL CORPORATION

Summary Results of the 2016 AAEA Outlook Survey

Feeder Cattle Market Update AgriClear, All Rights Reserved.

December 6, To Our Clients and Friends:

Dairy Farm Operating Trends

AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS. Self-Study Guide to Hedging with Livestock Futures and Options

Bitcoin Futures: A Closer Look At CME's Contract Design

November 2017 Monthly Commodity Market Overview Newsletter

Transcription:

U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION Futures Contract Design in Thinly Traded Markets Christa Lachenmayr, Division of Market Oversight April 4, 2018

2 Deliverable Supply The Commission believes that, to meet the statutory requirement of tending to prevent or to diminish price manipulation, market congestion, or the abnormal movement of a commodity in interstate commerce, a futures contract should have a deliverable supply that, for all delivery months on the contract, is sufficiently large and available to market participants that futures deliveries, or the credible threat thereof, can assure an appropriate convergence of cash and futures prices. - CFTC Federal Register Notice, November 13, 1997 (emphasis added)

3 December 2016 contract month Remove Norfolk, NE, as an approved stockyard delivery location. Reconfigure delivery locations from 12 individual stockyard into regional territories of Colorado, Iowa/Minnesota/South Dakota, Kansas, Nebraska, Texas/Oklahoma/New Mexico ( 5 Areas as defined by USDA) in order to allow for more efficient addition and removal of livestock yards, as well as better defining the geographic territory where price discovery occurs on the contract. April 2017 contract month Codify requirements for CME-approved livestock yards and slaughter plants; make process for revocation, expiration, or withdrawal of regularity consistent with other CME products; and define geographical requirements for approved facilities in terms of road miles These amendments allowed for on-boarding new facilities at West Point Livestock, West Point, NE (+60 contract loads); Cattlemen s Livestock, Dalhart, TX (+60 contract loads); Addition of Dunlap Livestock Auction in Dunlap, IA (under consideration) Addition of a step-down spot month speculative position limit of 200 contracts for the last two days of trading to comply with core principles 3, 4, 5 and regulations 150.5 and 38.252 October 2017 contract month Apply discount of $1.50/cwt. to live and carcass graded cattle tendered to Worthing, South Dakota. Adjust par delivery grade to 60% Choice/40% Select steers and heifers

4 December 2017 contract month Expand delivery window and allow Exchange to open up additional (increasing delivery capacity 167%) Allow additional time for carcass delivery to better conform with cash market and make carcass delivery a more viable option Amend tender time and other deadlines (demand, retender, reclaim) to better conform with business practices of feeders and packers October 2018 contract month Resume the regular listing cycle for Live Cattle futures Adjust par delivery grade to 65% Choice/35% Select steers and heifers Increase penalty for failure to present; allow grader to assess the penalty for slowing the grading process without stopping the delivery. These amendments allowed for an existing facility to increase its capacity: Clovis, NM (+60 contract loads, under consideration) Additional measures CME added Live Cattle to an existing rule that caps how many order updates traders can send in relation to the number of trades that they execute (public information) in February of 2016 CME reduced trading hours for livestock futures and options (removing the afternoon session and coordinating the a.m. open and p.m. close/settle with grain hours), which will be 8:30 a.m. to 1:20 p.m. daily to concentrate trading activity during the day and prevent price volatility during transitory liquidity gaps (February 2016).

5 December 2017 contract month Expand delivery window and allow Exchange to open up additional (increasing delivery capacity 167%) Allow additional time for carcass delivery to better conform with cash market and make carcass delivery a more viable option Amend tender time and other deadlines (demand, retender, reclaim) to better conform with business practices of feeders and packers October 2018 contract month Resume the regular listing cycle for Live Cattle futures Adjust par delivery grade to 65% Choice/35% Select steers and heifers Increase penalty for failure to present; allow grader to assess the penalty for slowing the grading process without stopping the delivery. These amendments allowed for an existing facility to increase its capacity: Clovis, NM (+60 contract loads, under consideration) Additional measures CME added Live Cattle to an existing rule that caps how many order updates traders can send in relation to the number of trades that they execute (public information) in February of 2016 CME reduced trading hours for livestock futures and options (removing the afternoon session and coordinating the a.m. open and p.m. close/settle with grain hours), which will be 8:30 a.m. to 1:20 p.m. daily to concentrate trading activity during the day and prevent price volatility during transitory liquidity gaps (February 2016).

6 Futures Contracts Settled by Physical Delivery the terms and conditions of the contract should conform to the most common commercial practices and conditions in the cash market for the commodity underlying the futures contract. The terms and conditions should be designed to avoid any impediments to the delivery of the commodity so as to promote convergence between the price of the futures contract and the cash market value of the commodity at the expiration of a futures contract.

7 Futures Contracts Settled by Cash Settlement. Evaluate the size and liquidity of the cash market that underlies the listed contract in a manner that follows the determination of DS. Index should be a reliable or robust indicator of the value of the underlying commodity or instrument. Potential for manipulation: the volume of cash market transactions and/or the number of participants contacted in determining the cash-settlement price are very low. incentive to manipulate or artificially influence the data from which the cashsettlement price is derived or to exert undue influence on the cash-settlement price's computation in order to profit on a futures position in that commodity. Commercially acceptable, publicly available, and timely. Documentation should be provided.