Office of Medicaid BOARD OF HEARINGS

Similar documents
Office of Medicaid BOARD OF HEARINGS

Office of Medicaid BOARD OF HEARINGS

Office of Medicaid BOARD OF HEARINGS

Office of Medicaid BOARD OF HEARINGS

Office of Medicaid BOARD OF HEARINGS

Office of Medicaid BOARD OF HEARINGS

Office of Medicaid BOARD OF HEARINGS

Office of Medicaid BOARD OF HEARINGS

Office of Medicaid BOARD OF HEARINGS

;< 0 I :A - o9 _ o ;;;.

Office of Medicaid BOARD OF HEARINGS

Office of Medicaid BOARD OF HEARINGS

Office of Medicaid BOARD OF HEARINGS

Office of Medicaid BOARD OF HEARINGS

Office of Medicaid BOARD OF HEARINGS

Office of Medicaid BOARD OF HEARINGS

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES BOARD OF HEARINGS

Office of Medicaid BOARD OF HEARINGS

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER ON THE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys Volume 12 Number 2 Fall 2016

956 CMR 6.00 Determining Affordability for the Individual Mandate

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT July Term 2006

FINANCING LONG TERM CARE: PROTECTING THE HOME

GUERRIERO v. COMMISSIONER

FINANCING REST HOME SERVICES

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI APPEAL NO CC PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MISSISSIPPI (PERS) BRIEF OF THE APPELLEE

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

Enclosed is a copy of the decision resulting from the hearing held in the above-referenced matter. Sincerely,

CHAPTER 3 MEDICAID (MASSHEALTH)

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS APPELLATE TAX BOARD. These are appeals filed under the formal procedure

Trusts in Financial and Gift Planning

Circuit Court for Prince George s County Case No. CAL UNREPORTED

CHERRY CREEK CORPORATE CENTER 4500 CHERRY CREEK DRIVE SOUTH #600 DENVER, CO DISCLAIMER

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT CHAMPAIGN COUNTY

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS APPELLATE TAX BOARD. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., v. COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE AS TRUSTEE FOR CERTAIN TRUSTS

FINAL APPEAL DECISION

ELEANOR BALANDA OHIO DEPARTMENT OF JOB AND FAMILY SERVICES

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : : : : : : :

Case law update Matrimonial matters

MEDICAID LIENS AND ESTATE RECOVERY IN MASSACHUSETTS

Trusts An Introduction

ESTATE PLANNING DICTIONARY

PROTECTING the Homefront PROTECTING. the Homefront

S U M M A R Y P L A N D E S C R I P T I O N PayPal 401(k) Savings Plan

ESTATE PLANNING 101:

IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR IRREVOCABLE TRUST

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI JACKSON COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

Introduction. 1. Bequests Charitable Gift Annuity Charitable Remainder Annuity Trust Charitable Remainder Unitrus 6-7

Putting what s important to you first

WILL QUESTIONNAIRE. Northgate House Devizes Wiltshire SN10 1JX Tel: Fax:

BEFORE THE ARBITRATOR

Hearing Date: May 21, Briefs: October 16, 2015

/CAP CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

FINAL APPEAL DECISION

Description of Basic Steps Required in an Independent Administration of an Estate

MUKESH NARANG, as Trustee of the Rakesh Malhotra Qualified Personal Residence Trust; RAKESH MALHOTRA, a single man, Plaintiffs/Appellees,

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND Melvin R. Hughes, Jr., Judge. This appeal is from an order removing George B.

680 REALTY PARTNERS AND CRC REALTY CAPITAL CORP. - DECISION - 04/26/96

Beverly Hills Bar Association Trusts & Estate Section September 2018 Legal Updates

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

MARGOLIS & BLOOM, LLP CLIENT INFORMATION FORM Today's Date:

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

Case: Document: Filed: 07/03/2012 Page: 1. NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 12a0709n.06. No.

QUALIFIED PERSONAL RESIDENCE TRUST ( QPRT ) General Planning Memorandum

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES OFFICE OF MEDICAID BOARD OF HEARINGS

COURT OF COMMON FLEAS HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO. This appeal is filed from a Final Administrative Appeal Decision of the Ohio Department

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCES

PROBATE IN VIRGINIA Prepared by the Virginia Court Clerk s Association Edited by George E. Schaefer, Clerk Norfolk Circuit Court

Medicaid Eligibility For Nursing Home and Other Long-Term Care

REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST

January 9, 2018 FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DETERMINATION. Retirement System (PFRS) of your client, Bradd Thompson s request for Service retirement benefits

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department

Special Needs Trust Providing for Lifetime Care and Quality of Life

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed September 7, 2006

Standard Mortgage Clause Preserves Coverage for Mortgagee Notwithstanding Carrier s Denial of Named Insured s Claim

State of West Virginia DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCES Office of Inspector General Board of Review 1400 Virginia Street Oak Hill, WV 25901

The review examiner's findings of fact are set forth below in their entirety:

DOCKET NO. AP ) ) ) ) ORDER ) ) ) ) ) This case arises out of a Forcible Entry and Detainer Action that Appellee Rowell, LLC

MA will pay for other MA-covered services.

International Portfolio Bond Discretionary Will Trust for married couples or registered civil partners

ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Submitted July 24, 2018 Decided January 15, Before Judges Ostrer and Vernoia.

Community MassHealth for Elders

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

Wills and Living Trusts: Planning Considerations Gifts Provided through Estates

ESTATE PLANNING DOCUMENT CHECKLISTS GENERAL INFORMATION. 1. Client s Full Current Name: 2. Other Names: 3. Current Residence: 4. Phone: 5.

COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the State of Colorado and Division of Unemployment Insurance, Benefit Payment Control,

Community MassHealth for Elders

ESTATE PLANNING QUESTIONNAIRE Filled out for:

Submitted January 16, 2018 Decided. Before Judges Ostrer and Whipple.

T.C. Memo UNITED STATES TAX COURT. YULIA FEDER, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No.: SC E. MARIE BOTHE, Petitioner, -vs- PAMELA JEAN HANSEN. Respondent.

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Henry M. Jackson Foundation. Defined Contribution Retirement Plan

Child Care Center Licensing Manual (August 2016)

Zarnoch, Wright, Thieme, Raymond, G., Jr. (Retired, Specially Assigned), REPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No.

Transcription:

BOARD OF HEARINGS Appellant Name and Address: Appeal Decision: Approved Appeal Number: 1512120 Decision Date: 12/15 Hearing Date: 10/22/15 Hearing Officer: Stanley Kallianidis Record Open Date: 11/05/15 Appellant Representative: MassHealth Representative: Debbie Farias, Springfield

APPEAL DECISION Appeal Decision: Approved Issue: Trust Assets Decision Date: 12/15 Hearing Date: 10/22/15 MassHealth Rep.: Debbie Farias Authority This hearing was conducted pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 118E, Chapter 30A, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. Jurisdiction Notice dated 08/18/15 was sent to the appellant stating that MassHealth had denied her application for MassHealth benefits due to excess assets (Exhibit 1). The appellant filed this appeal on 09/11/15 and, therefore, it is timely (see Exhibit 2 and 130 CMR 610.015). A denial of MassHealth benefits is grounds for appeal (130 CMR 610.032).

Action Taken by MassHealth MassHealth denied the appellant's MassHealth application due to excess assets. Issue Pursuant to 130 CMR 520.023(C), was MassHealth correct to count the assets of irrevocable trusts in determining the appellant s eligibility?

Summary of Evidence The MassHealth representative testified that the appellant filed a MassHealth application on April 16, 2015 and a re application on July 13, 2015 (Exhibits 3 & 4). The appellant s application was denied due to excess assets. According to the denial letter, the excess assets were over the $2000.00 limit. The assets totaled $775,862.00 and were from two trusts valued at $772,300.00, and other assets. The only issue and dispute was over whether or not assets held in irrevocable trusts were countable. The MassHealth representative explained that, on August 24, 1995, the appellant established a Nominee Trust, and on the same day, a Family Trust, which holds 100% of the beneficial interest of the Nominee Trust. The Nominee Trust holds real estate valued at $772,300; the Family Trust has no assets (Exhibits 5 & 6). Two of the appellant s children are trustees of the Nominee Trust. Under Section 4.1 of the Nominee Trust, the income and principal is paid to the beneficiary, which is the Family Trust. Under Section 5.1 of the Nominee Trust, it can be terminated by the Family Trust. In the event of termination, under Section 5.2, the Nominee Trust shall be distributed to the Family Trust. Under Section 6.1, the Nominee Trust can be amended by an instrument in writing signed by all of the Beneficiaries (Exhibit 5). The appellant s children are beneficiaries of the Family Trust, two of which also serve as trustees. Under Schedule A of the Family Trust, the trustees can sell, lease or mortgage property. Under Article Four of the Family Trust, Any vacancy in the Trusteeship may be filled by the Donor during her lifetime; subject to such power, vacancies may be filled by the remaining Trustee or Trustees Under Article Five of the Family Trust, the Trustees shall give to Donor s Executor or Administrator, any amounts requested to pay the donor s debts, funeral expenses and any estate and inheritance taxes by reason of her death (Exhibit 6).

The decision to count the assets of the trusts was based upon a memo from MassHealth s legal division, which held that, even though the both trusts are irrevocable, their principal is available to the appellant and therefore are countable assets. Specifically, she argues, the Family Trust as beneficiary can terminate the Nominee Trust and receive the property. Thereafter, under Article Five, the Family Trust can sell the property and apply the proceeds towards the appellant s debts (Exhibit 7). The appellant s attorney contended that the Nominee Trust is the only Trust which holds any asset; the Family Trust has not been funded. By deed in 1995, the appellant relinquished her interest in the property. There are no circumstances in either the Nominee Trust or Family Trust in which she could reclaim her interest in the real estate. The attorney noted that both the Nominee Trust and Family Trust are irrevocable and that the appellant is neither a trustee nor a beneficiary of either Trust (Exhibit 8). The record was left open for the appellant to respond to MassHealth s memorandum, and also, for MassHealth to reply to the appellant s memorandum (Exhibit 9). According to argument and a memo from the appellant s attorney, there are no circumstances in either the Nominee Trust or Family Trust in which the appellant may access principal. This limitation along with the limitation of the trustees to pay principal over to her, must be respected. In support of his position, the attorney cited Cohen v. Comm r of Div. of Med. Assistance, 423 Mass. 399, 410 (1996) (Exhibit 10). In its reply memo, MassHealth reiterated the arguments made in its initial brief. Additionally, she contended that the appellant could become a Trustee of the Family Trust, and by amending the Nominee Trust, become its sole beneficiary. She contended that this interpretation is consistent with the principals of Doherty v. Director of the, 74 Mass. App. Ct. 439 (2009) (Exhibit 11).

Findings of Fact The record shows, and I so find: 1. The appellant filed a MassHealth application on April 16, 2015 and a re application on July 13, 2015 (Exhibits 3 & 4). 2. The appellant s application was denied due to excess assets over the $2000.00 limit (Exhibit 1). 3. The countable assets in question were from two irrevocable trusts valued at $772,300.00 (Exhibit 1). 4. On August 24, 1995, the appellant established a Nominee Trust, and on the same day, a Family Trust, which holds 100% of the beneficial interest of the Nominee Trust (Exhibits 5 & 6). 5. The Nominee Trust holds real estate valued at $772.300; the Family Trust has no assets (Exhibits 5 & 6). 6. Two of the appellant s children are trustees of the Nominee Trust (Exhibit 5). 7. Under Section 4.1 of the Nominee Trust, the income and principal is paid to the beneficiary, which is the Family Trust (Exhibit 5). 8. Under Section 5.1 of the Nominee Trust, it can be terminated by the Family Trust (Exhibit 5). 9. In the event of termination, under Section 5.2, the Nominee Trust shall be

distributed to the Family Trust (Exhibit 5). 10. Under Section 6.1, the Nominee Trust can be amended by an instrument in writing signed by all of the Beneficiaries (Exhibit 5). 11. The appellant s children are beneficiaries of the Family Trust, two of which also serve as trustees (Exhibit 6). 12. Under Schedule A of the Family Trust, the trustees can sell, lease or mortgage property (Exhibit 6). 13. Under Article Four of the Family Trust, Any vacancy in the Trusteeship may be filled by the Donor during her lifetime; subject to such power, vacancies may be filled by the remaining Trustee or Trustees (Exhibit 6). 14. Under Article Five of the Family Trust, the Trustees shall give to Donor s Executor or Administrator, any amounts requested to pay the donor s debts, funeral expenses and any estate and inheritance taxes by reason of her death (Exhibit 6). Analysis and Conclusions of Law MassHealth regulation 130 CMR 520.023(C)(1), Irrevocable Trusts states.. (a) Any portion of the principal or income from the principal (such as interest) of an irrevocable trust that could be paid under any circumstances to or for the benefit of the individual is a countable asset. (b) Payments from the income or from the principal of an irrevocable trust made to or for the benefit of the individual are countable income.

(c) Payments from the income or from the principal of an irrevocable trust made to another and not to or for the benefit of the nursing facility resident are considered transfers of resources for less than fair market value and are treated in accordance with the transfer rules at 130 CMR 520.019(G). (d) The home or former home of a nursing facility resident or spouse held in an irrevocable trust that is available according to the terms of the trust is a countable asset. Where the home or former home is an asset of the trust, it is not subject to the exemptions of 130 CMR 520.007(G)(2) or 520.007(G)(8). (2) Portion Not Payable. Any portion of the principal or income from the principal (such as interest) of an irrevocable trust that could not be paid under any circumstances to or for the benefit of the nursing facility resident will be considered a transfer for less than fair market value and treated in accordance with the transfer rules at 130 CMR 520.019(G). In the instant appeal, I have found that the appellant filed a MassHealth application on April 16, 2015 and a re application on July 13, 2015. The appellant s application was denied due to excess assets. The countable assets in question were from two irrevocable trusts valued at $772,300.00. On August 24, 1995, the appellant established a Nominee Trust, and on the same day, a Family Trust, which holds 100% of the beneficial interest of the Nominee Trust. The Nominee Trust holds real estate valued at $772,300; the Family Trust has no assets.

The appellant s children are beneficiaries of the Family Trust, two of which also serve as trustees. Under Section 4.1 of the Nominee Trust, the income and principal is paid to the beneficiary, which is the Family Trust. Under Section 5.1 of the Nominee Trust, it can be terminated by the Family Trust. In the event of termination, under Section 5.2, the Nominee Trust shall be distributed to the Family Trust. Under Section 6.1, the Nominee Trust can be amended by an instrument in writing signed by all of the Beneficiaries Under Schedule A of the Family Trust, the trustees can sell, lease or mortgage property. Under Article Four of the Family Trust, Any vacancy in the Trusteeship may be filled by the Donor during her lifetime; subject to such power, vacancies may be filled by the remaining Trustee or Trustees Under Article Five of the Family Trust, the Trustees shall give to Donor s Executor or Administrator, any amounts requested to pay the donor s debts, funeral expenses and any estate and inheritance taxes by reason of her death. There is no dispute that the trusts are irrevocable. Herein, the pertinent question is whether the principal of the Nominee Trust and Family Trust are available to the appellant under any circumstance, and if so, to what extent? MassHealth has determined that both the Nominee Trust and Family Trust are countable assets. Principally, MassHealth argues that the Family Trust as beneficiary can terminate the Nominee Trust and receive the property. Thereafter, under Article Five, the Family Trust can sell the property and apply the proceeds towards the appellant s debts. This is simply not true. Even accepting the premise that the Nominee Trust may be terminated by the Family Trust, the trustees are limited to only paying the appellant s Executor or Administrator expenses by reason of her death. Clearly, the trustees have no discretion to pay any principal to her while she is alive.

As further grounds as to why the assets of the Nominee Trust and Family Trust are countable, MassHealth imagines a scenario where the appellant could become a trustee of the Family Trust, and by amending the Nominee Trust, become its sole beneficiary. Such an outcome is highly implausible if not impossible. First of all, while the appellant could potentially name herself to be a trustee of the Family Trust, she can do so only if there are vacancies. No such vacancies were noted in the hearing, however. More importantly, while the Family Trust may be amended, it can only be done with an instrument in writing signed by all of the Beneficiaries The appellant cannot amend the Family Trust on her own so as to make herself the sole beneficiary. The outcome which MassHealth envisions is one which is not only absent from the language of the Nominee and Family Trust, it is wholly contradicted by their terms. In conclusion, the assets of the Nominee Trust and Family Trust are unavailable to the appellant even accepting that the Family Trust may terminate the Nominee Trust. Accordingly, based upon the above cited regulations, none of these assets should have been counted in her eligibility determination. The appeal is therefore approved. Order for MassHealth Re open application and determine appellant s eligibility for MassHealth exempting all trust assets.

Implementation of this Decision If this decision is not implemented within 30 days after the date of this notice, you should contact your local office. If you experience problems with the implementation of this decision, you should report this in writing to the Director of the at the address on the first page of this decision. Stanley Kallianidis Hearing Officer _ cc: