Review of integrated territorial development and challenges in V4+2 countries and Hungary

Similar documents
Investing in regions: The reformed EU Cohesion Policy

Investing inregions and cities: EU Cohesion Policy Cohesion policy

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Accompanying the document

Sustainable urban development in cohesion policy programmes

LEADER implementation update Leader/CLLD subgroup meeting Brussels, 21 April 2015

LEADER implementation update Leader/CLLD subgroup meeting Brussels, 21 April 2015

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Accompanying the document

OVERVIEW OF CURRENT FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS ON TRANSNATIONAL WATER MANAGEMENT

Economic Integration and Social Cohesion: the European Union s experience. Vasco Cal Mexico November 2004

OVERVIEW OF CURRENT FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS ON TRANSNATIONAL WATER MANAGEMENT

Launch Event. INTERREG IPA CBC Croatia- Serbia

Financing Climate Action by the ESIF

Summary of the Partnership Agreement for Hungary,

Axis 4 (Leader) Implementing Local Development Strategies

EU Budget 2009: billion. implemented. 4. The European Union as a global player; ; 6.95% 5. Administration ; 6.

EU Cohesion Policy- ESF

PART 1: DANUBE TRANSNATIONAL PROGRAMME

Investing in Europe s Future: A regional development strategy for 2020

budgetary implementation

The Future of CAP: Community led local development based on Leader approach

Andor Urmos European Commission Directorate General for Regional and Urban Policy

COHESION POLICY

LITHUANIAN EXPERIENCE IN IMPLEMENTING EUSBSR

Regional Policy. Oldřich Dědek. Institute of Economic Studies, Charles University. European economic integration

Cohesion Policy support for Sustainable Energy

Programming Period. European Social Fund

EU Funds in Central and Eastern Europe 2011 kpmg.com/cee

Financial instruments under the European Structural and Investment Funds

ANNEX. Graph 4 GDP per capita (PPS) in 1995 and average annual growth

Lisboa, 19 junho Altis Grand Hotel Sala Roma

DANUBE. (0) Introduction. (1) The DANUBE Transnational Cooperation Programme. (2) Relation of the Programme to the Danube Region Strategy.

Embedding macro-regional strategies

mostof of the potential of LEADER/CLLD for innovation

EU Budget for the future New legislative package for cohesion policy #CohesionPolicy #EUinmyRegion

Growth, competitiveness and jobs: priorities for the European Semester 2013 Presentation of J.M. Barroso,

Themes Income and wages in Europe Wages, productivity and the wage share Working poverty and minimum wage The gender pay gap

Key elements of the Commission proposal for the future European Social Fund

EU Funds in Central and Eastern Europe

ESF Evaluation Partnership 17 November Key elements of the Commission proposal for the future ESF

DANUBE DANUBE Transnational Programme and CENTRAL EUROPE 2020 Richárd GÖNCZI National Contact Point, Hungary Széchenyi Programme Office

Evaluation in : Challenges and Opportunities First annual conference of the National Coordination Authority s Evaluation Unit

Fiscal competitiveness issues in Romania

COHESION POLICY

Introduction to EU Regional and Innovation Policy

EU Funds investments and projections, preparation for the period December, 2014

Results of the Policy Analysis EU Funding Possibilities for Urban-Rural Partnerships in Europe

FOCUS AREA 6B: Fostering local development

Financial instruments under the European Structural and Investment Funds

Articles 42 to 44 - LEADER. Articles 58-66

Portugal Norte Region View

Financial stability is seen in the narrow sense of households being able to repay loans, and banks being exposed to the risk of non-performing loans,

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT

B U I L D I N G P A R T N E R S H I P S F O R E N E R G Y S E C U R I T Y

DRAFT GUIDANCE FICHE FOR DESK OFFICERS VERSION 3-28/01/2014 RELEVANT PROVISIONS IN THE LEGISLATION INTEGRATED TERRITORIAL INVESTMENT (ITI)

The EFTA Statistical Office: EEA - the figures and their use

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

DRAFT TEMPLATE AND GUIDELINES ON THE CONTENT PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT OF THE

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 19 October /05 Interinstitutional File: 2004/0163 (AVC) LIMITE

Katarina Ivanković Knežević, Assistant Minister Ministry of Labour and Pension System, Republic of Croatia European Parliament, Bruxelles, 7 April

Sustained and sustainable economic growth in Bucharest-Ilfov Region. Liviu Rancioaga, ADRBI

DRAFT GUIDANCE FICHE FOR DESK OFFICERS PROGRAMMING OF TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE AT THE INITIATIVE OF THE MEMBER STATES VERSION 2 25/06/2014

COHESION POLICY

Fiscal sustainability challenges in Romania

Adriatic-Ionian area European Territorial Cooperation Programme and EUSAIR - the experience of the Emilia-Romagna Region

Briefing May EIB Group Operational Plan

Summary of the Partnership Agreement for Croatia,

STRUCTURAL FUNDS - INSTRUMENTS TO SUSTAIN ECONOMIC GROWTH IN ROMANIA

Danube Transnational Programme

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

Poland Social Sector and Public Wages Public Expenditure Review From Maastricht to Vision 2030 Overview

The urban dimension. in the legislative proposals for the future cohesion policy. Zsolt Szokolai DG REGIO C.2 Urban development, territorial cohesion

ROMANIA AND THE LOCAL DEVELOPMENT POLICY

'Smart rural' in the programming period

COVER NOTE The Employment Committee Permanent Representatives Committee (Part I) / Council EPSCO Employment Performance Monitor - Endorsement

HOW RECESSION REFLECTS IN THE LABOUR MARKET INDICATORS

Multi level governance in Poland: program budgeting in the context of strategic planning. Grzegorz Orawiec Cracow 10 December 2013

Communication, Legal Affairs & Civil Protection Protecting the Natural Environment Unit: Nature and Biodiversity

Standard Eurobarometer

The EU Strategy for the Danube. An overview

EU Cohesion Policy ERDF programmes

PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF VAT

Taxation trends in the European Union EU27 tax ratio at 39.8% of GDP in 2007 Steady decline in top personal and corporate income tax rates since 2000

B U I L D I N G P A R T N E R S H I P S F O R E N E R G Y S E C U R I T Y

EU Funds in Central and Eastern Europe

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS, THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

The Reform of the Common Agricultural Policy Implementation. Catherine Combette DG Agriculture and Rural Development European Commission

A New and a Sustainable Approach to Affordable Communities in Europe

Community-Led Local Development in the European Structural and Investment Funds Jean-Pierre Vercruysse European Commission - DG MARE

Draft template and guidelines on the content of the Partnership Agreements (PAs) (Article 14 of the CPR) CLLD aspects

EU Funds in the New Member States: Opportunities and Challenges

CLLD planning in & LEADER Cooperation

EXPERT EVALUATION NETWORK DELIVERING POLICY ANALYSIS ON THE PERFORMANCE OF COHESION POLICY

State of play of CAP measure Setting up of Young Farmers in the European Union

Access to EU-Funding. Ulrich Daldrup Riga, 19th February 2002

The approved ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme. ESPON ECP Meeting 9-10 December 2015 in Luxembourg

Prospects for the review of the EU 2020 Strategy, the Juncker Plan and Cohesion Policy after 2020

11813/17 RGP/kg 1 DG G 2A

European Territorial Cooperation with non-eu-member States

European Funding Joy Holland West Midlands European Service

Annual Implementation Report 2015

Transcription:

Review of integrated territorial development and challenges in V4+2 countries and Hungary ESPON 2020 Conference Integrated Territorial Development in V4+2 countries: new challenges, new ideas, new responses Budapest, 7 th March 2018

Outline 1. Visegrad countries, Bulgaria and Romania Key territorial challenges Integrated territorial development 2. Zooming in Hungary Key territorial challenges Integrated territorial development 2 PowerPoint template 4:3

1 Review of key territorial challenges Visegrad countries, Bulgaria and Romania Integrated territorial development state of play 3 PowerPoint template 4:3

V4+2 Countries and Territorial Cooperation in Europe 4 PowerPoint template 4:3

Source: ESPON 5 PowerPoint template 4:3

Main socio-economic indicators Indicator (2016) EU28 value V4+2 countries % of the EU28 Total area (km2) 4 324 782 882 729 20,4 Population on 1 January 510 278 701 90 691 887 17,8 Total population change over a year 1 242 605-160 990-13,0 Crude rate of total population change ( ) 2,4-1,8 Life expectancy (year) 80,6 76,4 94,8 Tertiary educational attainment, age group 30-34 (%) 39,1 36,9 94,4 Total population having neither a bath, nor a shower, nor indoor flushing toilet in their household (%) 1,9 8,8 463,2 Population who have never used the Internet (%) 14,0 22,8 162,9 GDP at market prices (million PPS) 14 907 852 1 785 227 12,0 GDP per capita (PPS) 29 215,1 19 684,5 67,4 Number of enterprises per 1000 inhabitant 46,0 48,0 104,3 Share of renewable energy in gross final energy consumption (%) 17,0 16,0 94,1 Target 2020 (%) 20,0 15,8 Financial framework of Cohesion Policy 2014-2020 (million ) * Financial framework of Cohesion Policy 2014-2020, per capita ( ) * 369 497 175 752 47,6 724,1 1 937,9 267,6 Average ranking based on the economic development of NUTS2 regions sum 276 NUTS2 unit sum 49 NUTS2 unit; aver.rank.: 218. Source of data: Eurostat * Source of data: European Commission 6 PowerPoint template 4:3

7 PowerPoint template 4:3

8 PowerPoint template 4:3

Addressed topics and main challenges in the V4+2 strategy 1. Development poles and axes and their no-continuations 2. Transport networks and solutions to their no-continuations 3. Technical infrastructure 4. Socio-economic conditions of the V4+2 countries 5. Environmental conditions 6. Spatial development barriers and possibilities of their elimination 9 PowerPoint template 4:3

Common spatial development strategy of the V4+2 countries Cooperation proposed by CZ (2008) Ministerial Conclusion (2010) Accepted the Common Spatial Development Document of the V4+2 Invited the Steering Group to formulate the Common Spatial Development Strategy Ministerial Conclusion (2014) Accepted the Common Spatial Development Strategy of the V4+2 Recommended the SG to consider updating the strategy by 31 December 2018, taking into account, among others, the results of the cooperation among the countries 10 PowerPoint template 4:3

National territorial development and spatial planning strategies Bulgaria: National Regional Development Strategy of the Republic of Bulgaria for the period 2012-2022 (EN) and National Concept for Spatial Development for the period 2013 2025 (EN): http://sharelink.mrrb.government.bg:8080/share.cgi?ssid=0qa9v3y Czech Republic: Spatial Development Policy of the Czech republic Updated Version 1 (EN): http://www.uur.cz/images/1-uzemni-planovani-a-stavebni-rad/politika-uzemnihorozvoje-aktualizace-1-2015/publikace-apur-cr-2015-en.pdf and its Czech version: http://www.uur.cz/images/1-uzemni-planovani-a-stavebni-rad/politika-uzemniho-rozvojeaktualizace-1-2015/publikace-apur-cr-2015-cz.pdf Hungary: National Development and Territorial Development Concept of Hungary (EN): https://regionalispolitika.kormany.hu/download/b/c9/e0000/oftk_vegleges_en.pdf Poland: The Strategy of Responsible Development (PL): https://rio.jrc.ec.europa.eu/en/library/strategy-responsible-development, + summary in English attached Romania: The national territorial development strategy is currently in Parliament procedure for approval by law. Current version in Romanian: https://senat.ro/legis/pdf/2017/17b274fg.pdf Slovak Republic: Slovak Spatial Development Perspective(EN): http://www.telecom.gov.sk/index/index.php?ids=172817 11 PowerPoint template 4:3

ERDF support to Sustainable Urban Development (Article 7) Share of ERDF budget (%) by MS and delivery mechanism Half of MS spend more than 7.5% CY and BG 20%+ BE 15%+ RO 11% IE, FR, LV, CZ, NL, HU, DE 8-10% Main arrangements under Article 7 A specific priority axis of an OP dedicated to SUD: BG, RO, HU Integrated Territorial Investments (ITI): CZ, PL, SK Source: Matkó M. (2016), Eurocities 12 PowerPoint template 4:3

Cohesion policy support delivered via ITI ERDF, ESF and CF allocation by MS Programming results 20 MS use ITI (PL, SK, CZ, RO from V4+2) 15 MS to deliver SUD 13 MS for other territories Total of EUR 13.8 billion ERDF 11.8 bn ESF 1.7 bn CF 0.3 bn 12 MS use both funds Concentration 80% by 9 MS 28% by PL alone 60% for SUD Article 7 Source: Matkó M. (2016), Eurocities 13 PowerPoint template 4:3

Cohesion policy support to CLLD ERDF and ESF allocation by MS Programming results 18 MS apply CLLD in CP All V4+2 Countries EUR 1.8 billion ERDF 1.1 bn (0.6%) ESF 0.7 bn (0.8%) For comparison: EAFRD 6.9 bn (7%) EMFF 0.5 bn (9%) 14 MS use both funds GR, HU, PL, PT, SE via multi-fund OP Concentration 92% by 9 MS 25% by CZ alone Source: Matkó M. (2016), Eurocities 14 PowerPoint template 4:3

European territorial cooperation CBC Programmes Macroregional ERDF IPA+ENI Transnational Programmes Strategy BG 2 4 Danube, Balkan- EUSDR Mediterranean CZ 5 0 Interreg CE, Danube EUSDR HU 5 2 Interreg CE Danube EUSDR PL 7 2 Interreg CE, Baltic Sea EUSBSR RO 2 5 Danube EUSDR SK 4 1 Interreg CE, Danube EUSDR 15 PowerPoint template 4:3

2 Review of key territorial challenges Zooming in Hungary Integrated territorial development state of play 16 PowerPoint template 4:3

Main territorial trends in Hungary Economic and social disparities did not decrease between regions The economic and social role of Budapest is dominant, the agglomeration is sprawling Greater economic performance in North-West Transdanubia with better accessibility to Western Europe Bigger cities are attracting labour force Low competitiveness of rural areas, labour market tensions and depopulation Territorial concentration of deprived population Demographic trends (2009-2014) GDP per capita (2014) and change (2009-2014) 17 PowerPoint template 4:3

Employment rate (2014) and change (2009-2014) Unemployment rate (2014, pop. of 15-64 years) Monthly net income (2014, income tenth) Accessibility of Budapest (shortest travel)

Monitoring Programme level Strategy level Coordination Planning system of territorial development. tv.) Act on Territorial Development and Spatial Planning COUNTRY National Regional Development Forum (1996. évi. XXI. tv.) COUNTIES CITIES WITH COUNTY RIGHTS County and Regional Level Development Forums SPECIAL REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT COUNCILS National Development and Territorial Development Concept Sectoral strategies Territorial Development Concept Territorial development strategy Settlement Development Concept Integrated spatial development strategy Territorial Development Concept Territorial development strategy Széchenyi 2020 Integrated development programme Integrated development programme Development Packs Parliamentary Report on Territorial Processes, Annual reports Annual and several years Reports 19 PowerPoint template 4:3

Objectives of the National Development and Territorial Development Concept Subject to be revised for post- 2020 20 PowerPoint template 4:3

National Development and Territorial Development Concept Specific territorial goals 1. Strengthening the country s macro-regional role 2. A city network that creates a multi-centred spatial structure 3. Increasing the capacity of rural areas to support the population living there 4. Development of territories with outstanding landscape values 5. Decreasing territorial differences; territorial integration and economic stimulus 6. Connected spaces: ensuring accessibility and mobility 21 PowerPoint template 4:3

Territorial operational programmes 2014-2020 Operational programme Economic Development and Innovation OP ESI Fund ERDF, ESF, YEI Allocation (mn EUR) 7 684 15% 4% 36% Territorial and Settlement OP ERDF, ESF 3 390 Competitive Central Hungary OP ERDF, ESF 464 15% Human Resources Development OP ERDF, ESF 2 613 Integrated Transport OP Environmental and Energy Efficiency OP Public Administration and Services OP ERDF, CF ERDF, CF 3 332 3 217 ESF, CF 795 12% 2% 16% 22 PowerPoint template 4:3

Territorial and Settlement Development Operational Programme Aims to support regional, decentralised economic development and increase employment based on local resources Target area: less developed regions (18 counties of Hungary, except Budapest & Pest county) 23 PowerPoint template 4:3

Integrated Territorial Programmes 24 PowerPoint template 4:3

Territorial Selection System Tender Call Receiving grant applications MANAGING AUTHORITY Evaluation Decision Preparatory Committee County OR City with County Rights Approval Project Development Implementation 25 PowerPoint template 4:3

Pest County Compensation Programme Between 2014-2020 Central Hungary (Budapest+Pest county) is the only more developed NUTS2 region due to the high economic performance of the capital. In 2016 the Government decided to split Central Hungary into two NUTS2 units: Budapest and Pest county. Since Pest county receives much less EU funds than other less developed parts of the country, between 2016-2020 260 million EUR national fund is dedicated to Pest county for compensation. Priorities of the Compensation Programme are connected directly to Pest County Regional Development Program 2014-2020 without applying an ITP: Improve conditions and working environment for business development, especially for raising the competitiveness of SMEs; Tourism as a strategic sector; Complex programmes supporting the lagging regions of Pest county, Increase the mobility of workforce by improving transport infrastructure (internal roads, cycle routes); Improve infrastructural conditions of municipal public service. 26 PowerPoint template 4:3

Special regional development councils Up to now, county councils have set up 9 special regional development councils for supporting their territorial development capacities. Have functional, bottom-up characteristics and may extend beyond administrative borders. 4 endorsed territorial development concept, 2 have territorial development programmes. Financed by founding counties. State-level support only be given to the 2 highlighted ones: 1. Balaton (Lake Balaton) Development Council; 2. Tokaj Borvidék (Tokaj Wine Region s) Regional Development Council. 27 PowerPoint template 4:3

Favouring less developed districts Connecting development measures in 2014-2020: Preferences are given to projects submitted in beneficiary districts/settlements and in free enterprise zones in the relevant measures of operational programmes. 28 PowerPoint template 4:3

// Thank you for your attention Ferenc Tipold Ministry for National Economy Department of Territorial Development Planning e-mail: ferenc.tipold@ngm.gov.hu tel: +36-1-795-2752 This presentation will be made available at: www.espon.eu