Risk Appetite. What is risk appetite?

Similar documents
ERM Implementation and the Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA)

Prudential Standard GOI 3 Risk Management and Internal Controls for Insurers

LEGAL & GENERAL GROUP PLC risk management supplement

Solvency II Insights for North American Insurers. CAS Centennial Meeting Damon Paisley Bill VonSeggern November 10, 2014

ERM Concepts and Framework. Paul Duffy

IAIS: Enterprise Risk Management for Capital Adequacy & Solvency Purposes. George Brady. IAIS Deputy Secretary General

Increased Corporate Governance Requirements for Insurers

Society of Actuaries in Ireland Solvency II for Beginners. Mike Frazer. 19 May 2011

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE SUPERVISORS

INSURANCE CORE PRINCIPLES, STANDARDS, GUIDANCE AND ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY

Risk Appetite Survey Current state of the Insurance Industry

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE SUPERVISORS

BERGRIVIER MUNICIPALITY. Risk Management Risk Appetite Framework

Consultation Paper 53: Corporate Governance Code for captive Insurance and captive Reinsurance Undertakings

SOLVENCY & FINANCIAL CONDITION REPORT. SureStone Insurance dac

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE CODE FOR CREDIT INSTITUTIONS AND INSURANCE UNDERTAKINGS

AIA Group Limited. Terms of Reference for the Board Risk Committee

Unlocking Value with Enterprise Risk Management. presented by Jim Toole, FSA, CERA, MAAA Bob Daino, FCAS, MAAA

AIA Group Limited. Terms of Reference for the Board Risk Committee

CAPTIVE BEST PRACTICE GUIDELINES

Solvency & Financial Condition Report. Surestone Insurance dac March

Risk appetite. Getting in shape building and sustaining your risk appetite. 27 February 2014

Solvency and Financial Condition Report Aegon Ireland

ORSA: A relevant part of the governance system within Solvency II

Sampo Group Risk Management Principles. 9 May 2018

Risk Appetite for Life Offices IFoA working party

Life under Solvency II Be prepared!

We referred to ICP 20 which deals with public disclosures and is therefore directly comparable to the SFCR.

CATTOLICA LIFE DAC SOLVENCY AND FINANCIAL CONDITION REPORT 31 ST DECEMBER 2017

SOLVENCY AND FINANCIAL CONDITION REPORT EUROLIFE LTD

Enterprise Risk Management

Ingenious Capital Management Limited: Pillar III Disclosure

Public Disclosure. To know more about our Company's history, our profile and business objectives, please click on the below link.

Session 7 Evolution of ERM Across Industries An ERM Practitioner s Perspective. Danielle Harrison, Chief Risk Officer, The Co-operators Group

Karel VAN HULLE. Head of Unit, Insurance and Pensions, DG Markt, European Commission

Sections of the ORSA Report

Insurance Summit Mr Raymond Tam Executive Director (Policy and Development) Insurance Authority 21 September 2017

Statement of Guidance for Licensees seeking approval to use an Internal Capital Model ( ICM ) to calculate the Prescribed Capital Requirement ( PCR )

A.M. Best s New Risk Management Standards

Solvency and financial condition report 2017

Corporate Governance Code for Credit Institutions and Insurance Undertakings 2013

Solvency II - Risk Management Strategies for Insurance Businesses

Rynda Property Investors LLP (the Firm )

FIL Life Insurance (Ireland) DAC. Solvency and Financial Condition Report as at 30 June 2016

ORSA An International Development

Critical Reflection of Two State-of-the-Art Risk Management Frameworks (SRM004)

ORSA An international requirement

Guidance on the Actuarial Function MARCH 2018

Solvency and Financial Condition Report 20I6

RED 2.1 & 4.2: Quantifying Risk Exposure for ORSA. Moderator: Presenters: Lesley R. Bosniack, CERA, FCAS, MAAA

Solvency II - Risk Management Strategies for Insurance Businesses

Risk Management for Pensions. October 2014

The Rating Agency View of Capital Modelling. Simon Harris Team Managing Director European Insurance

BMS International Insurance DAC

SOLVENCY AND FINANCIAL CONDITION REPORT EUROLIFE LTD

American Academy of Actuaries Webinar: The Practice of ERM in the Insurance Industry. Enterprise Risk Management Committee November 19, 2013

Subject SP9 Enterprise Risk Management Specialist Principles Syllabus

Sasol International Insurance DAC

LONGEVITY SWAPS. Impact of Solvency II AN EFFECTIVE, INNOVATIVE WAY TO MANAGE THE LONGEVITY RISK. Presenter: Tom O Sullivan, F.S.A, F.C.I.A, M.A.A.A.

Final input from the Groupe Consultatif in regard to the development of Level 3 guidance on the Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA)

NAIC OWN RISK AND SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT (ORSA) GUIDANCE MANUAL

Enhancing Our Risk Appetite Framework. A Case Study

Kongsberg Reinsurance DAC

International Trends in Regulatory Capital & Target Surplus. Caroline Bennet - Trowbridge Deloitte Jennifer Lang - CBA

Guidance on the Actuarial Function April 2016

An Introduction to Solvency II

GUIDELINES ON REINSURANCE PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES

CEIOPS-DOC-06/06. November 2006

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE SUPERVISORS

KPN Insurance Company DAC

BERMUDA MONETARY AUTHORITY DISCUSSION PAPER ON THE OWN RISK AND SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT PROCESS

Cover Note Authorisation and supervision of branches of thirdcountry insurance undertakings by the Central Bank of Ireland

Risk Management Policy Coface Singapore

Subject ST9 Enterprise Risk Management Syllabus

International Certificate in Financial Services Risk Management. Qualification Syllabus. Building excellence in risk management

GUIDELINE ON ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT

New Actuarial Standards of Practice No. 46 Risk Evaluation in ERM No. 47 Risk Treatment in ERM

Judging the appropriateness of the Standard Formula under Solvency II

Ashmore Group plc Pillar 3 Disclosures as at 30 June 2016

Guidance Note System of Governance - Insurance Transition to Governance Requirements established under the Solvency II Directive

Solvency II: Implementation Challenges & Experiences Learned

GUIDANCE NOTE ASSET MANAGEMENT BY AUTHORIZED INSURERS

Exploring the New Era of ORSA Enterprise Risk Management (ERM)/ Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) Committee

RISK MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK

Subject ST2 Life Insurance Specialist Technical Syllabus

RISK COMMITTEE TERMS OF REFERENCE. The Board has resolved to establish a Committee of the Board to be known as the Risk Committee.

Overview of ERM Assessment Viewpoints (June 2016) Overview

The Future of China s Insurance Regulation. Haijing Wang FIA Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Solvency and financial condition report Standard Life Assurance Limited

Orkla Insurance Company DAC

BERMUDA INSURANCE (GROUP SUPERVISION) RULES 2011 BR 76 / 2011

BERMUDA MONETARY AUTHORITY

Guidance Note: Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) Credit Unions with Total Assets Greater than $1 Billion.

Jeff Davies. Group Chief Financial Officer

Pillar III Disclosure Report 2017

Solvency Assessment and Management: Stress Testing Task Group Discussion Document 96 (v 3) General Stress Testing Guidance for Insurance Companies

Contents Summary Directors Report Independent Auditors A. Business and Performance B. System of Governance C. Risk Profile

Guidance paper on the use of internal models for risk and capital management purposes by insurers

Does the ORSA add value? Challenges and initial achievements. Lukas Ziewer Risk Management Perspectives, 18/11/2014

Mizuho Securities UK Holdings Ltd Basel III Pillar 3 Disclosures 31 March 2015

Transcription:

Risk Appetite Presented by Mike Claffey 30 March 2011 What is risk appetite? Risk appetite is the degree of risk that an organisation is willing to accept in order to achieve its objectives, both in terms of levels and types of risk. Impact TRANSFER AVOID RETAIN Likelihood of risk arising The level of aggregate risk that a company can undertake and successfully manage over an extended period of time. A company s ability and/or willingness to absorb declines in the value of an asset, liability, trade, transaction, or portfolio. The broad-based amount of risk a company or other entity is willing to accept in pursuit of its mission or vision 2 1

Regulatory perspective (IAIS) 3 Credit ratings view of ERM 4 2

Terminology Risk Appetite Risk Tolerance Risk Limits Strategy Objectives Controls Risks only, or risk-return trade off Acceptable variances When to stop (or change) 5 Solvency II and risk appetite The Solvency II Directive says insurance and reinsurance undertakings shall have in place an effective risk management system comprising strategies, processes and reporting procedures necessary to identify, measure, monitor, manage and report, on a continuous basis the risks, on an individual and aggregated level, to which they are or could be exposed, and their interdependencies. CEIOPS Final Advice (former CP33) calls for A clearly defined and well documented risk management strategy that includes the risk management objectives, key risk management principles, general risk appetite and assignment of risk management responsibilities across all the activities of the undertaking and is consistent with the undertaking s overall business strategy; 6 3

Central Bank of Ireland and risk appetite Central bank s Corporate Governance Code states The board is required to understand the risks to which the institution is exposed and shall establish a documented risk appetite for the institution. Requirements - Qualitative and Quantitative Metrics required (VaR, acceptable stress losses etc) - Assess short, medium and long term horizons - Regular reporting to the board on compliance - Annual review - Material deviation and proposed remedies reported to Central Bank within 5 days Compliance with the code must be ensured by 30 th June 2011. 7 Building a risk appetite statement Risk Appetite Statement of business strategy and objectives Risk Tolerances definition of risk categories and subheadings, and acceptable variances Risk Limits maximum and minimum, gross and net of controls, plus risk mitigations Allocation of responsibilities, Metrics and Reporting 8 4

Risk Appetite General Points Insurance companies in business to take risk Which risks do they want to run? Which risks do they want to minimise? How much risk do they wish to take? Board responsible for defining risk appetite Quantitative or Qualitative Quantitative Capital sufficient to absorb all losses over next year with 99.5% probability Qualitative Don t wish to take longevity risk 9 Identifying your risks Market Underwriting / insurance (mortality, morbidity, persistency) Operational / outsourcing Liquidity Credit (counterparty) Sales volume / Distributor Exchange Rates Shareholder 10 5

Risk Categories IAA / IAIS headings 11 Spectrum of risks Complex Simple 12 6

Setting Risk Appetite objectives Involves consideration of various stakeholders (board, parent, policyholders, regulator) Objectives of stakeholders might conflict Objective Adequate capitalisation Stable profitability and growth Sufficient liquidity Sound reputation Criteria Maintain regulatory requirements Meet target economic requirements (Risk capital) Maintain earnings stability Limits on maximum losses in 1-in-200-year event Maintain debt coverage ratio Continued ability to pay dividends Avoidance of regulatory sanctions Maintenance of high standards of corporate governance 13 Risk Reporting Risk Dashboard Current and emerging risks Trends Variety of measures Economic capital Key risk indicators Key residual risks Tailored Internal External 14 7

Possible starting points in your company 3 or 5 year business plan (medium term plan) Risk Register usually owned by risk management function Actuarial Financial Condition Report Economic Capital models often group-wide Internal Audit assessment of risk based audit activities UK ICA style assessments e.g. Pillar 2 assessments Solvency II (Risk Function and CRO) Any Board statements on Strategic Solvency Cover 15 Summary A Board approved Risk Appetite is required by 30 June Quantitative and Qualitative components Risk Appetite Risk Tolerance Risk Limit Ensure a Board reporting process is in place Identify risk controls, and action plans for remedies on a breach Need to have clear breach notification process 16 8

Appendix - references and sources Society of Actuaries in Ireland Constructing a Risk Appetite Framework: an Introduction (plus useful links in appendices) International Actuarial Association Note on Enterprise Risk Management for Capital and Solvency Purposes in the Insurance Industry (which refers to IAIS guidelines) Institute of Actuaries of Australia Risk Appetite: Practical Issues for the Global Financial Services Industry 17 Appendix - Extract from Corporate Governance Code 14.0 Risk Appetite 14.1 The board is required to understand the risks to which the institution is exposed and shall establish a documented risk appetite for the institution. The appetite shall be expressed in qualitative terms and also include quantitative metrics to allow tracking of performance and compliance with agreed strategy (e.g. Value at Risk, leverage ratio, range of tolerance for bad debts, acceptable stress losses, economic capital measures). It shall be subject to annual review by the board. 14.2 The risk appetite definition shall be comprehensive and clear to all stakeholders. The definition shall clearly define the appetite and address separately the short, medium and long term horizons. 14.3 The board shall ensure that the risk management framework and internal controls reflect the risk appetite and that there are adequate arrangements in place to ensure that there is regular reporting to the board on compliance with the risk appetite. 14.4 In the event of a material deviation from the defined risk appetite measure, the details of the deviation and of the appropriate action to remedy the deviation shall be communicated to the Central Bank by the board promptly in writing and no later than 5 business days of the Board becoming aware of the deviation. 14.5 The board shall satisfy itself that all key Control Functions such as internal audit, compliance and risk management are independent of business units, and have adequate resources and authority to operate effectively. 14.6 The board shall ensure that it receives timely, accurate and sufficiently detailed information from risk and Control Functions. 14.7 The board shall ensure that the institution s remuneration practices do not promote excessive risk taking. The board shall design and implement a remuneration policy to meet that objective and evaluate compliance with this policy. 18 9