Cooperative Development of Operational Safety & Continuing Airworthiness Programme

Similar documents
Economic and Social Council

24th COSCAP-SA Steering Committee Meeting 29 September 1 October 2015, New Delhi, India

ASSEMBLY 39TH SESSION

ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION AND PREVENTION (AIG) DIVISIONAL MEETING (2008)

9351/15 AF/cb 1 DG G 3 C

14767/1/17 REV 1 VK/nc 1 DGE 2A

SUMMARY REPORT ON THE SAFETY OVERSIGHT AUDIT FOLLOW-UP OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL AVIATION OF BOTSWANA

22 nd STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING SEPTEMBER 2012, DHAKA, BANGLADESH

Draft Policy Proposals on a Global MBM Scheme (GMBM) (As of 17 December 2015)

Draft Outline of the 2016 Work Programme

Arrangements for the revision of the terms of reference for the Peacebuilding Fund

Report of the Seventeenth Meeting of the Independent Expert Oversight Advisory Committee (IEOAC) of the World Health Organization

Workshop wrap-up October ATO Certification workshop, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

The Sustainable Insurance Forum

AFI SECFAL PLAN RESOURCE MOBILISATION STRATEGY TABLE OF CONTENTS

Agenda item 3: Review of Progress made by the Task Force Teams

Options to streamline the reporting of and communication with Member States

8187/11 GL/mkl 1 DG C I

Discharge 2012: Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking

for action The Nexus Dialogues The proposed EU programme

EAST AFRICAN COMMUNITY CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AND SECURITY OVERSIGHT AGENCY

Distr. GENERAL. A/RES/49/233 1 March 1995 RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY. [on the report of the Fifth Committee (A/49/803/Add.

Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Economiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

Project Title: INFRASTRUCTURE AND INTEGRATED TOOLS FOR PERSONALIZED LEARNING OF READING SKILL

CFM CONDUCT POLICIES

Prepared by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

DG REGIO, DG EMPL and DG MARE in cooperation with OLAF. Joint Fraud Prevention Strategy. for ERDF, ESF, CF and EFF

15536/17 FP/aga 1 DGC 2B

Institutional Strengthening for Aviation Regulation

Statement by Andrew Crockett Chairman of the Financial Stability Forum International Monetary and Financial Committee Meeting

THE INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATION OF PENSION SUPERVISORS (IOPS)

Council conclusions on the review of the European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region

First Progress Report on Supervisory Convergence in the Field of Insurance and Occupational Pensions for the Financial Services Committee (FSC)

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 15 May /07 DEVGEN 89 ACP 94 RELEX 347

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly. [on the report of the Second Committee (A/66/438/Add.3)]

L 165/30 Official Journal of the European Union

The Addis Ababa Action Agenda of the Third. United Nations Capacity Development Programme on International Tax Cooperation

MANUAL OF PROCEDURES FOR DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS TO PARTICIPATING PARTNERS

Economic and Social Council

WORKING DOCUMENT. EN United in diversity EN

Fifteenth Meeting of the IMF Committee on Balance of Payments Statistics Canberra, Australia, October 21 25, 2002

REPORT OF THE JOINT AUDIT BODY

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly. [on the report of the Second Committee (A/67/435/Add.3)]

REPORT 2015/115 INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION

Draft Outline of the 2019 Work Programme

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

Effective Approaches to Support the Implementation of the G20 High-Level Principles on Financial Consumer Protection

ERAC 1202/17 MI/evt 1 DG G 3 C

Proposal to adopt International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS) by the Agency

Terms of Reference for the Solvency II Project of the Groupe Consultatif

UNESCO/BIE/C.62/Decisions Geneva, 25 January 2013 Original: English SIXTY-SECOND SESSION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE INTERNATIONAL BUREAU OF EDUCATION

NGO Forum Statutes of Operation. 5 February 2016

SRI LANKA ACCOUNTING STANDARD CONSOLIDATED AND SEPARATE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Fact Sheet 13 Roles and responsibilities in project partnerships

FINAL 26 February PARTNERSHIP FOR PROGRESS: UN Civil Society Fund

Transfer or surrender of a product certificate PR.TOC

Roles and Responsibilities (in replacement of Edinburgh doc. HLG 1523a, Poitiers doc. HLG 2209 and Nice doc )

NYISO Capital Budgeting Process. Draft 01/13/03

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

2016 APEC JOINT FINANCE MINISTERIAL STATEMENT

UNESCO Institute for Statistics BASIC TEXTS

Council of the European Union Brussels, 23 March 2017 (OR. en)

Partnership Agreement between the Lead Partner and the other project partners

EGMONT GROUP OF FINANCIAL INTELLIGENCE UNITS CHARTER PREAMBLE

Report on the annual accounts of the European Aviation Safety Agency for the financial year together with the Agency s reply

OECD GUIDELINES ON INSURER GOVERNANCE

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

2 nd INDEPENDENT EXTERNAL EVALUATION of the EUROPEAN UNION AGENCY FOR FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS (FRA)

Rolling out Universal Credit

Report from the Board

Council of the European Union Brussels, 18 February 2016 (OR. en)

DG Justice & Consumers. Project Management.General Principles

Report of the International Civil Service Commission

Action number: EU-TM-0136-M Action Title DP Implementation - Call CEF 2014 Deliverable 1.7 FPA information package - Guidelines for execution phase

Implementing measures on the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive: CESR call for evidence

ASIA-PACIFIC FINANCIAL FORUM OVERVIEW

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION

Code of Corporate Governance MOTOR OIL (HELLAS) S.A.

WORKSHOP MANUAL FINAL Strengthening the uptake of EU funds for Natura 2000 (ENV.B.3/SER/2012/002)

COP MOP 2 Agenda Regional Preparatory Meeting. CBD Secretariat Pre-COP Regional Preparatory Meetings August 2016

AUDIT OF THE NATIONAL ARCHIVAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM

APG ANNUAL BUSINESS PLAN

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE SUPERVISORS

G20 STUDY GROUP ON CLIMATE FINANCE PROGRESS REPORT. (November )

EBA FINAL draft regulatory technical standards

HLCM Procurement Network Procurement Process and Practice Harmonization in Support of Field Operations, Phase II

Key Performance Indicators of Rail Freight Corridors. Version 2.0

Follow-up to the Evaluation of the Western Balkan Investment Framework (WBIF) November 2015

Consultation Paper. Principles for Benchmarks-Setting Processes in the EU. 11 January 2013 ESMA/2013/12

SEETO priority projects rating methodology. July, SEETO Priority Projects rating methodology 13/07/2012 Page 1

THE THIRD UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON THE LEAST DEVELOPED COUNTRIES FIRST MEETING OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL PREPARATORY COMMITTEE

Hundred and seventy-fifth session RELATIONS WITH THE EAST AFRICAN COMMUNITY (EAC) AND DRAFT COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN UNESCO AND THAT ORGANIZATION

ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK

NOTE SFIC opinion on the Multi-Annual Roadmaps for international cooperation

STANDING COMMITTEE ON PROGRAMMES AND FINANCE. Twenty-third Session

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT. on the feasibility of a network of smaller credit rating agencies

Auditor General. of British Columbia. Follow-up of Two Health Risk Reports: A Review of Performance Agreements Information Use in Resource Allocation

5th Meeting of the Working Group on Relative Effectiveness

Fact Sheet 14 - Partnership Agreement

Development Impact Bond Working Group Summary Document: Consultation Draft

Transcription:

COSCAP South Asia Cooperative Development of Operational Safety & Continuing Airworthiness Programme 26 th COSCAP-SA STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING Proposal for an Independent Feasibility Study Examining the Case for COSCAP-SA s Development into a Regional Safety Oversight Organisation (RSOO) Discussion Paper 11 (DP-11) (Presented by Sri Lanka and the European Aviation Safety Agency) SUMMARY The purpose of this paper is to seek the COSCAP-SA States views on an independent Feasibility Study examining the option of evolving COSCAP-SA into an RSOO. Action: The COSCAP-SA Steering Committee is invited to: 1. Consider whether an independent Feasibility Study would be of interest and value to the States. 2. Review the Terms of Reference for a Feasibility Study as outlined in the Annex. 3. Support the Feasibility Study insofar as resources permit. 4. Review the results of the proposed Feasibility Study at the next Steering Committee Meeting or on another occasion to be decided by the States. 1. Introduction Traffic forecasts for South Asia are the highest in global aviation, expected to grow at 8.6 percent per year over the next 20 years. The context of rising traffic levels and the increasing complexity of aviation in the face of limited resources implies the need for South Asia to explore new paradigms for safety oversight. The necessity of addressing these issues, cooperatively and regionally, was recognised in 2016 during the 39 th Session of the ICAO Assembly, which in its Resolution A39-14: - Urges Member States to develop and further strengthen regional and subregional cooperation in order to promote the highest degree of aviation safety and - Encourages Member States to foster the creation of regional or subregional partnerships to collaborate in the development of solutions to common problems to build State safety oversight capability, and to participate in, or provide tangible support for, the strengthening and furtherance of subregional and regional aviation safety and safety oversight bodies, including RSOOs.

Following the 39 th ICAO Assembly, ICAO and EASA jointly organised the RSOO Forum in Swaziland from 22 to 24 March 2017. This Forum endorsed the ICAO Global Strategy and Action Plan for the improvement of regional safety oversight organizations (RSOOs), including the three strategic objectives of strengthening RSOOs, establishing a Global Aviation Safety Oversight System and an RSOO Cooperative Platform. The final report of the RSOO Forum can be found here. Following the RSOO Forum, ICAO has initiated several actions, among them the evaluation of existing RSOOs and COSCAPs. This evaluation recognises COSCAP-SA as a Level 1 1 RSOO, namely one that offers advisory and coordinating functions. In line with the objectives of the EU-South Asia Aviation Partnership Project 2, the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) wishes to work closely with ICAO and the COSCAP-SA States to assist in investigating whether and how COSCAP-SA could evolve in form, type or level, as and when the States are so willing, and in line with ICAO recommendations. 2. Discussion 2.1. COSCAP-SA Development and Evolution COSCAP-SA was established in 1998 and is now completing its 4 th project phase. If COSCAP- SA s mandate is renewed for a 5 th phase, the States may wish to consider the option of evolving from a Level 1 to a Level 2 RSOO, i.e. complementing the COSCAP s advisory and coordinating function with certain operational assistance functions. Thus, COSCAP-SA may evolve into a level 2 RSOO, a development which may occasion a review of ICAO s role and involvement. ICAO s Safety Oversight Manual Part B (Doc 9734) stipulates that a feasibility study should be carried out prior to the establishment of an RSOO, in order to assess the nature of the aviation activity in the prospective Member States as well as their safety oversight capabilities. The information gathered through such a study normally serves as a basis for States to decide what form, type or level of RSOO would deliver the best value for the region. In the case of South Asia, such an independent study has yet to be undertaken in order to examine the feasibility of the various options and models for enhancing regional cooperation. 2.2. Feasibility Study To examine the case for COSCAP-SA s further development in form, type or level, we seek the views of the States on the merits of commissioning an independent feasibility study. The intent would be to give the COSCAP-SA States a clear, objective and open-minded assessment of all the different options available, drawing on the successes and collective experience of RSOOs in other world regions. If commissioned, the Study would: - Deliver results and recommendations that are considered advisory and non-binding. 1 ICAO has classified the tasks and functions carried out by an RSOO in accordance with the level of delegation granted by their Member States. The following three levels of delegation/empowerment have been defined based on the complexity of tasks and functions performed: Level 1 Advisory and coordinating tasks and functions, Level 2 Operational Assistance tasks and functions and Level 3 Certifying Agency tasks and functions. 2 The EU South Asia Aviation Partnership Project is funded by the EU and implemented by EASA.

- Be conducted over an initial period of six months by an independent consultancy with relevant experience in South Asia. - Identify needs as expressed by the States individually and collectively and on this basis outline proposals and options that would best suit the region. - Produce a clear business case including a cost-benefit analysis surrounding each option, taking into account the experience of other RSOOs worldwide. - Describe the impact for the individual States. - Produce a risk analysis for each option. - Rely upon the voluntary participation and cooperation of the States. - Be fully funded by the EU-South Asia Aviation Partnership Project. Proposed Terms of Reference are annexed to this paper for the meeting s review and feedback. 2.3. Action of the Meeting The Steering Committee is invited to: 1. Consider whether an independent Feasibility Study would be of interest and value to the States. 2. Review the Terms of Reference for a Feasibility Study as outlined in the Annex. 3. Support the Feasibility Study insofar as resources permit. 4. Review the results of the proposed Feasibility Study at the next Steering Committee Meeting or on another occasion to be decided by the States.

Annex 1 TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR A FEASIBILITY STUDY EXAMINING THE CASE FOR COSCAP-SA S DEVELOPMENT INTO A REGIONAL SAFETY OVERSIGHT ORGANISATION (RSOO) 1. Context Traffic forecasts for South Asia are the highest in global aviation, expected to grow at 8.6 percent per year over the next 20 years. Nevertheless, many of the States already find it challenging to cope with the present aviation environment and to meet ICAO requirements in full. The context of rising traffic levels and the increasing complexity of aviation in the face of limited resources implies the need for South Asia to explore new paradigms for safety oversight. The opportunity of addressing these issues cooperatively and regionally is endorsed by ICAO and generally welcomed by the South Asian States. In its Safety Oversight Manual Part B (Doc 9734), ICAO specifies that a feasibility study should be carried out prior to the establishment of an Regional Safety Oversight Organisation (RSOO), in order to assess the nature of the aviation activity in the prospective Member States as well as their safety oversight capabilities. The information gathered through such a study normally serves as a basis for States to decide what form, type or level of RSOO (if any) would deliver the best value for the region. COSCAP-SA was established in 1998 and has recently been classified as a Level 1 RSOO by ICAO, i.e. providing advisory and coordinating functions. COSCAP-SA is about to transition to its 5 th project phase. In consenting to an independent Feasibility Study, the South Asian States wish to examine the feasibility of enhancing regional cooperation, e.g. by establishing an RSOO which could also provide operational assistance functions (level 2 RSOO). 2. Tasks and Deliverables The study shall be conducted in two phases: 2.1. Research phase In coordination with South Asian States as represented by the COSCAP-SA Steering Committee, the study shall initially: 1. Assess the level and type of aviation activity in each COSCAP-SA State today and the anticipated increase in aviation activity over the next 10 years; 2. Identify States individual and collective needs with respect to aviation safety and safety oversight including the ICAO s eight critical elements; 3. Review previous COSCAP-SA Discussion Papers related to the subject matter as well as minutes of relevant discussions held in COSCAP-SA Steering Committee Meetings; 4. Examine the existing national and COSCAP-SA aviation safety oversight tasks, functions and systems in terms of ICAO compliance and effectiveness; 5. Determine the human and financial resources of the individual States and the region as a whole, both in terms of actual capacity today and the capacity required to cope with the forecast traffic increase.

The collection of the data to perform these tasks should be undertaken in cooperation with ICAO (using tools such as istars and the recent RSOO evaluation), IATA and other publicly available sources as well as through direct contact with, and visits to, those States taking part in the study. The research phase shall conclude with an initial feasibility study report aggregating all results, which shall be presented to all COSCAP-SA States during an interim review meeting. This meeting will serve to verify and endorse the initial report. 2.2. Analysis phase Drawing on the information gathered during the research phase, the study shall: 1. Outline scenarios for the further development of national authorities; 2. Provide recommendations for the consideration of the States how to overcome identified weaknesses, either nationally or collectively, e.g. by establishing an RSOO. 3. Develop and outline viable scenarios (if any) for the further development of COSCAP- SA into another form, type or level of RSOO, taking into account the States collective and individual economic, political and technical environment; 4. Produce a clear business case including a cost-benefit analysis surrounding each scenario, taking into account the experience of other RSOOs worldwide; 5. Describe the impact of each scenario for the individual States, including potential costsavings; 6. Produce a risk analysis for each scenario; 7. For each viable scenario identified (if any), include a proposal for a possible RSOO governance and management structure, objectives and tasks, delegation mechanisms by member States, funding and required resources in terms of budget and manpower, and a realistic roadmap outlining a possible transition. The work undertaken during both phases and the resulting recommendations shall be compiled in a final feasibility study report. This will be submitted to the COSCAP-SA States for consideration at the next Steering Committee Meeting or on another occasion to be decided by the States. Throughout the study, EASA shall ensure close coordination with ICAO including its APAC Regional Office, ICAO ANB and COSCAP-SA.