Tweets Allowed in Proxy Contests and Securities Offerings

Similar documents
NYSE Notice Procedures

Nasdaq Compensation Committee Independence Requirements

SEC Finalizes Guidance to Stock Exchanges on Compensation Committee and Adviser Independence

Final Stock Exchange Rules for Compensation Committees and Advisers

SEC Adopts CEO Pay Ratio Rule

ISS Proxy Voting Policy Updates

Proxy Litigation SUMMARY. February 27, 2013

SEC Proposes Guidance to Stock Exchanges on Compensation Committee and Adviser Independence

SEC Guidance on Reporting for U.S. Tax Reform

SEC Staff Begins Taking Steps to Reform Shareholder Proposals

ISS Releases 2018 Voting Policy Updates

SEC Approves New PCAOB Auditor Reporting Standard

SEC Approves NYSE Proposal to Facilitate Listings of Companies Without a Trading History

NYSE Corporate Governance Standards

Emergency SEC Orders Concerning Short Sales

Recent 2013 Proxy Season Developments

FINRA Corporate Financing

ISS to Introduce QuickScore 3.0 on Friday

SEC Approves New PCAOB Auditing Standard Relating to Communications Between Auditors and Audit Committees

New SEC Staff Guidance on Shareholder Proposals

Foreign Private Issuer Exemption from SEC Registration

Registered Offerings of Debt Securities

ISS Publishes Guidance on Pay-for- Performance Assessments and Updates to Governance Ratings System

In the Matter of Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc. Shareholder Litigation

Property Disclosure Rules for Mining Registrants

Large Trader Reporting System

Private Offering Reform

SEC Proposes Rule Regarding Communications Involving Security- Based Swaps Entered Into Solely by Eligible Contract Participants

SEC Adopts New Rules Affecting Public Company Reporting

In re Micromet, Inc. Shareholders Litigation

SEC Adopts Final Rules to Implement the Resource Payments Disclosure Requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act

Compensation and Corporate Governance Disclosure and Proxy Solicitation

Shareholder Proxy Access

SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP

SEC Provides Relief to Security-Based Swap Dealers From Business Conduct Rules

Proxy System Modernization

Company Halts Initial Coin Offering After SEC Issues Cease-and-Desist Order; SEC Chairman Issues Statement on Blockchain- Based Offerings

Delaware s Most Recent Thinking on the Preferred-Common Conflict: Hsu v. ODN Holding Corp. and In re Appraisal of GoodCents Holdings, Inc.

More Clarity for Delaware Directors When Considering Restructuring Transactions

In re: Appraisal of Dell Inc.

European Commission Proposes Disclosure Requirements for Payments to Governments for the Development of Natural Resources

Agencies Release New FAQ on CEO Certification Requirement, Setting March 31, 2016 Deadline for Initial Submissions

SEC Reopens Comment Period on Proposed Rules Regarding Security-Based Swaps

Adjusting to Shareholder Activism

In re Orchard Enterprises, Inc. Stockholder Litigation

JANA Master Fund, Ltd. v. CNET Networks, Inc.

Brexit: U.S. Agencies Facilitate Legacy Swap Transfers

SEC Work Plan for Consideration of IFRS Adoption

Bank Capital Plans and Stress Tests

OCC Issues Updated Policy for Determining the Impact of Discriminatory or Illegal Credit Practices on Community Reinvestment Act Ratings

Proposed Roadmap For IFRS Adoption

Federal Reserve Issues Statement of Intent to Extend the Volcker Rule Conformance Period Through July 21, 2017 for CLOs

Treasury Issues Comprehensive Report on Capital Markets Reform

Bank Capital Plans and Stress Tests

Recovery Planning Guidelines for Certain Large Banks

In re Southern Peru Copper Corporation Shareholder Derivative Litigation

SEC Exemptive Relief in Connection with Effective Date of Title VII of Dodd-Frank

In re MFW Shareholders Litigation

Regulators Explain Examination Approach for Compliance With FinCEN s Customer Due Diligence Rule

Corporate Disclosure of Government Enforcement Developments

OCC Lending Limit Rules

COBRADesk Same Day Clearance

Proposed Dodd-Frank Section 945 Rules

Another Vice Chancellor Considers Appraisal in Light of Dell and DFC and Another Appraisal Petitioner Gets Less than Deal Price

Bank Capital Plans and Stress Tests

IRS Releases Initial Guidance on the 2017 Amendments to the Internal Revenue Code s Limitation on Deduction for Certain Executive Compensation

Federal Banking Agencies Release New Guidance on the Treatment of Foreign Excluded Funds Under the Volcker Rule

Tax Reform Bill Proposes Significant Compensation Changes

Emergency Economic Stabilization Act

FinCEN Issues Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Customer Due Diligence Requirements

Mandatory CFIUS Filings for Foreign Investment in Specified Critical Technologies Companies

Volcker Rule. Agencies Release Limited Volcker Rule Guidance. June 10, 2014

Proposed Dodd-Frank Section 943 Rules

Federal Reserve Supervision

Conflicts of Interest in Securitizations

Federal Reserve Proposes New Rating System

Bank Capital Requirements

Corporate Expatriation Transactions

SEC and CFTC Adopt Product Definitions Under Title VII of Dodd-Frank

IRS Finalizes Regulations Relating to Allocations of Partnership Items Involving Partners That Are Look-Through Entities

Implementation of Title VII of Dodd-Frank

Proposed Rules Under the Investment Advisers Act

Concentration Limits on Large Financial Companies

FDIC Proposal on Compensation Programs

Risk-Based Bank Capital Guidelines

Basel III and FSB Proposals

Regulated Investment Companies

Depositary Receipts Program Payments

House and Senate Pass NOL Carryback Legislation

CFTC Chairman Releases White Paper on Cross-Border Swaps Regulation Version 2.0

Proposed Regulations Would Greatly Expand Reach of ERISA Fiduciary Exposure

Second Circuit Rejects Listing and Foreign-Squared Claims Under Morrison v. National Australia Bank

Bank Mergers & Acquisitions

Reporting Requirements for Foreign Financial Accounts Including Foreign Hedge Funds and Private Equity Funds

New Disclosure Requirement for Derivatives Over Basket Positions That Are Controlled by the Counterparty

Delaware Supreme Court Rejects Bad Faith Claim Against Lyondell Board

Federal Reserve Board Governor Tarullo Outlines Potential Regulatory Initiatives

Spin-Off and Listing by Introduction of Feishang Anthracite Resources Limited

Failed Bank Acquisitions

Money Market Fund Regulation

Transcription:

Tweets Allowed in Proxy Contests and Securities Offerings New SEC Guidance Allows Use of Hyperlinks to Satisfy Legend Requirements in Social Media Communications with Character Limits and Limits Issuers Responsibility for Social Media Communications Re-Transmitted by Third Parties SUMMARY The staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission has published a number of new Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations facilitating the use of social media in proxy contests, business combination transactions, tender offers and securities offerings. The interpretations allow the use of active hyperlinks to satisfy legend requirements in social media communications if necessary in light of the social media platform s limitations on the number of characters or amount of text that may be included in a communication (as is the case, most notably, with Twitter). 1 In the securities offering context, the guidance also clarifies that messages re-transmitted on social media by a third party that is not an offering participant or acting on the issuer s behalf would not be attributable to the issuer, and therefore the issuer would not be required to ensure compliance with securities laws of those re-transmitted messages. The SEC staff expressly indicates that its guidance is in recognition of the growing interest in using technologies such as social media to communicate with security holders and potential investors. Because the legending requirement with respect to proxy contests and tender offers can apply not only to issuers but to any soliciting party, this guidance can also be expected to enhance the use of social media as a tool for activist investors engaging in a proxy contest, consent solicitation or tender offer. New York Washington, D.C. Los Angeles Palo Alto London Paris Frankfurt Tokyo Hong Kong Beijing Melbourne Sydney www.sullcrom.com

Issuers should bear in mind that the newly adopted interpretations do not change the SEC s existing guidance issued in April 2013, stating that social media can be a Regulation FD-compliant means of broad dissemination only if the company has taken adequate steps to alert the market that it intends to disclose such information through that channel. 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE SEC STAFF GUIDANCE COMMUNICATIONS THROUGH SOCIAL MEDIA THAT LIMIT THE NUMBER OF CHARACTERS SEC rules require issuers and other applicable parties to include specified cautionary statements or legends in various written communications in securities offerings, proxy contests and tender offers, including: Free-writing prospectuses under Rule 433 and offering-related announcements under Rule 134 under the Securities Act of 1933; Communications made in offerings in connection with business combination transactions under Rule 165 under the Securities Act; Solicitations made (by the issuer or other soliciting parties) prior to delivery of proxy statements under Rule 14a-12 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and Pre-commencement communications in tender offers under Rules 13e-4, 14d-2 and 14d-9 under the Exchange Act. 3 Those requirements would apply to electronic communications made through social media, which generally would be viewed by the SEC as writings. In the newly adopted interpretations, the SEC staff confirmed that it will not object to the use of an active hyperlink to satisfy those statement or legend requirements in electronic communications made through social media if all the following conditions are satisfied: The electronic communication is distributed through a platform that has technological limitations on the number of characters or amount of text that may be included in the communication; Including the required statements in their entirety, together with the other information, would cause the communication to exceed the limit on the number of characters or amount of text; and The communication contains an active hyperlink to the required statements and prominently conveys, through introductory language or otherwise, that important or required information is provided through the hyperlink. The circumstances in which the use of a hyperlink is permitted to satisfy the SEC legend requirements are limited. Where the social media platform does not limit the number of characters or amount of text of a message, such as on Facebook, or where an electronic communication is capable of including the required statements, along with the other information, without exceeding the applicable limit on number of characters or amount of text, the use of a hyperlink to the required statements would not be sufficient. -2-

THIRD-PARTY RE-TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES ON SOCIAL MEDIA In the newly adopted interpretations, the SEC staff clarified when, in a securities offering, re-transmission of an issuer s message by a third party on social media, such as a re-tweet on Twitter or a repost on Facebook, would not be attributable to the issuer. After an issuer distributes an electronic communication on social media in compliance with Rule 134 or Rule 433, if the third party who re-transmits the issuer s message is neither an offering participant nor acting on behalf of the issuer or an offering participant and the issuer has no involvement in the third party s re-transmission beyond having initially prepared and distributed the communication in compliance with SEC rules, the re-transmission would not be attributable to the issuer and the issuer would not be required to ensure compliance with Rule 134 or Rule 433 of that re-transmission. This interpretation restates the well-established position of the SEC that whether information prepared and distributed by third parties that are not offering participants is attributable to an issuer or other offering participant depends upon whether the issuer or other offering participant has involved itself in the preparation of the information or explicitly or implicitly endorsed or approved the information. * * * ENDNOTES 1 2 3 The new SEC guidance is set forth on the SEC s website at http://www.sec.gov/divisions/corpfin/guidance/securitiesactrules-interps.htm (Questions 110.01, 110.02, 164.02, 232.15 and 232.16). A detailed discussion of the existing guidance can be found in our memorandum, dated April 8, 2013, entitled SEC Guidance on Disclosure Through Social Media. See Rules 134(c), 165(c)(1) and 433(c)(2)(i) under the Securities Act of 1933 and Rules 13e-4(c), 14a-12, 14d-2(b) and 14d-9(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Copyright Sullivan & Cromwell LLP 2014-3-

ABOUT SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP Sullivan & Cromwell LLP is a global law firm that advises on major domestic and cross-border M&A, finance, corporate and real estate transactions, significant litigation and corporate investigations, and complex restructuring, regulatory, tax and estate planning matters. Founded in 1879, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP has more than 800 lawyers on four continents, with four offices in the United States, including its headquarters in New York, three offices in Europe, two in Australia and three in Asia. CONTACTING SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP This publication is provided by Sullivan & Cromwell LLP as a service to clients and colleagues. The information contained in this publication should not be construed as legal advice. Questions regarding the matters discussed in this publication may be directed to any of our lawyers listed below, or to any other Sullivan & Cromwell LLP lawyer with whom you have consulted in the past on similar matters. If you have not received this publication directly from us, you may obtain a copy of any past or future related publications from Stefanie S. Trilling (+1-212-558-4752; trillings@sullcrom.com) in our New York office. CONTACTS New York Francis J. Aquila +1-212-558-4048 aquilaf@sullcrom.com Robert Buckholz +1-212-558-3876 buckholzr@sullcrom.com Catherine M. Clarkin +1-212-558-4175 clarkinc@sullcrom.com Jay Clayton +1-212-558-3445 claytonwj@sullcrom.com Audra D. Cohen +1-212-558-3275 cohena@sullcrom.com H. Rodgin Cohen +1-212-558-3534 cohenhr@sullcrom.com Donald R. Crawshaw +1-212-558-4016 crawshawd@sullcrom.com Robert W. Downes +1-212-558-4312 downesr@sullcrom.com William G. Farrar +1-212-558-4940 farrarw@sullcrom.com Matthew M. Friestedt +1-212-558-3370 friestedtm@sullcrom.com Joseph B. Frumkin +1-212-558-4101 frumkinj@sullcrom.com David B. Harms +1-212-558-3882 harmsd@sullcrom.com Alexandra D. Korry +1-212-558-4370 korrya@sullcrom.com Stephen M. Kotran +1-212-558-4963 kotrans@sullcrom.com John P. Mead +1-212-558-3764 meadj@sullcrom.com Scott D. Miller +1-212-558-3109 millersc@sullcrom.com James C. Morphy +1-212-558-3988 morphyj@sullcrom.com William A. Plapinger +1-212-558-3550 plapingerw@sullcrom.com -4-

Robert W. Reeder III +1-212-558-3755 reederr@sullcrom.com Robert M. Schlein +1-212-558-4848 schleinr@sullcrom.com Glen T. Schleyer +1-212-558-7284 schleyerg@sullcrom.com Marc Trevino +1-212-558-4239 trevinom@sullcrom.com Washington, D.C. Janet T. Geldzahler +1-202-956-7515 geldzahlerj@sullcrom.com Eric J. Kadel, Jr. +1-202-956-7640 kadelej@sullcrom.com Robert S. Risoleo +1-202-956-7510 risoleor@sullcrom.com Los Angeles Patrick S. Brown +1-310-712-6603 brownp@sullcrom.com Eric M. Krautheimer +1-310-712-6678 krautheimere@sullcrom.com Alison S. Ressler +1-310-712-6630 resslera@sullcrom.com Palo Alto Sarah P. Payne +1-650-461-5669 paynesa@sullcrom.com John L. Savva +1-650-461-5610 savvaj@sullcrom.com London Nikolaos G. Andronikos +44-20-7959-8470 andronikosn@sullcrom.com Kathryn A. Campbell +44-20-7959-8580 campbellk@sullcrom.com Richard C. Morrissey +44-20-7959-8520 morrisseyr@sullcrom.com John O Connor +44-20-7959-8515 oconnorj@sullcrom.com David Rockwell +44-20-7959-8575 rockwelld@sullcrom.com George H. White III +44-20-7959-8570 whiteg@sullcrom.com Paris Krystian Czerniecki +33-1-7304-5880 czernieckik@sullcrom.com William D. Torchiana +33-1-7304-5890 torchianaw@sullcrom.com Frankfurt Krystian Czerniecki +49-69-4272-5525 czernieckik@sullcrom.com Melbourne Robert Chu +61-3-9635-1506 chur@sullcrom.com Sydney Waldo D. Jones, Jr. +61-2-8227-6702 jonesw@sullcrom.com Tokyo Izumi Akai +81-3-3213-6145 akaii@sullcrom.com Keiji Hatano +81-3-3213-6171 hatanok@sullcrom.com -5-

Hong Kong William Y. Chua +852-2826-8632 chuaw@sullcrom.com Michael G. DeSombre +852-2826-8696 desombrem@sullcrom.com Chun Wei +852-2826-8666 weic@sullcrom.com John D. Young, Jr. +852-2826-8668 youngj@sullcrom.com Beijing Garth W. Bray +86-10-5923-5958 brayg@sullcrom.com -6- SC1:3632014.4