FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: September 9, 2015

Similar documents
CFPB Takes Action Against National Collegiate Student Loan Trusts, Transworld Systems for Illegal Student Loan Debt Collection Lawsuits

2 Navigating Debt Buying in a Regulation By Enforcement Environment

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act

MAR CFPB Wins Final Judgment Against Morgan Drexen for Illegal Debt-Relief Scheme

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (Bureau) has reviewed the practices

Debt Collection & the Fair Debt Collection Practice Act (FDCPA)

Texas State Statutes Regulating Debt Collection / Debt Collectors FINANCE CODE: CHAPTER 392. DEBT COLLECTION

DEBT COLLECTION: ISSUES WITH TIME-BARRED DEBT

2016-CFPB-0005 Document 1 Filed 02/23/2016 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECI'ION BUREAU

The CFPB s Consent Orders Regulating the ARM Industry

Summary of Debt Collection Proposals Under Consideration 1

The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. 1692, et seq. Richard J. Perr, Esquire

CONSUMER CONCERNS. Dealing with Debt Collection Harassment. Information for Advocates Representing Older Adults. What Can a Debt Collector Really Do?

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 3-1 Filed 09/18/17 Page 1 of 40 PageID #: 23 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

CFPB Consumer Laws and Regulations

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF THURSTON NO.

Prepared Remarks of Richard Cordray Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Field Hearing on Debt Collection

STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD CFPB

Bureau Update: Debt Collection. Sep 2018

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

CFPB Releases FDCPA Rule Outline; Creditor Collection Rule to Come

NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES 23 NYCRR 1 DEBT COLLECTION BY THIRD-PARTY DEBT COLLECTORS AND DEBT BUYERS

CFPB TOPICS CFPB SUPERVISORY HIGHLIGHTS COLLECTIONS UADAAP ARBITRATION ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS MORTGAGE SERVICING RULES

Frequently Asked Questions

Initial Analysis of Consumer Financial Protection Bureau s Proposed Outline to Address Debt Collection Abuses

The CFPB, UDAAP s and the FDCPA. Presented by Scott Holmquist President, Second Alliance, Inc.

79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. House Bill 2356

Senate Bill 1553 Ordered by the Senate March 2 Including Senate Amendments dated March 2

Re: Request for Information Regarding Bureau Enforcement Processes (Docket No. CFPB )

Fair Debt Collection: What Every Bankruptcy Attorney Should Know

Fair Debt Collection Practices

Debt Collection CFPB Reveals Outline for Future Rulemaking

CFPB Takes Action Against Top Notch Funding for Lying in Loan Offers to NFL Players, Deepwater Horizon Victims, and 9/11 First Responders

Consumer Protection: The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. By Hillary R. Ross, Esq. The FDCPA Overview

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Turns Five: The Evolving Legal and Regulatory Landscape

Senate Bill 1553 Sponsored by Senator BOQUIST (Presession filed.)

Update on CFPB Enforcement Actions; UDAAP and Third-Party Lending

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU

USAACE & Fort Rucker Preventative Law Program. Debt Collection

Case 2:17-cv SDW-LDW Document 1 Filed 06/07/17 Page 1 of 16 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : :

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION. In the Matter of: CONSENT ORDER

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU

Presentation Overview

Bureau Update: Debt Collection

Sokaogon Chippewa Community Ordinances


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION

Risk Alert Navy FCU Consent Order

Case 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 06/17/14 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

YOUR GUIDE. To Stopping. Workbook. Workbook. Debt Collectors. DebtDefensePrograms. DebtDefensePrograms DDP DDP

RULES OF THE TENNESSEE COLLECTION SERVICES BOARD CHAPTER STANDARDS OF PRACTICE TABLE OF CONTENTS

4 Nonpayment Steps to Take if You Have Credit Card Debt You Cannot Afford to Pay

June 6, Introduction

UDAAP. Understanding What It Is and Where It Applies. Presented by: Thomas Fox, Partner Schwartz & Ballen LLP

In the Supreme Court of the United States

Lawyers & Debt Collection. Legal Disclaimer

In Dallas and Northeast Texas. BBB Home Business Directory Debt Settlement Companies Credit Solutions. Oprime Aquí Para Español. Ratings Explanation

FILLING OUT THE ANSWER

SecurePlus Provider universal life insurance policy SecurePlus Paragon universal life insurance policy. a class action lawsuit may affect your rights.

H. B. NO , HDl, SD1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

CFPB Policy Considerations and Near Term Priority Goals. NACARA Annual Conference and Training Event October 12, 2016

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THE CFPB WHAT IT DOES, AND WHY YOU SHOULD CARE

Regulation by Enforcement CFPB s Use of UDAAP

Case 3:17-cv BR Document 1 Filed 01/24/17 Page 1 of 21

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/22/16 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #:1

Using the consumer complaint to stay ahead of regulatory trends

Preparing for a CFPB Examination or Investigation

CFPB Outlines UDAAPs for Debt Collectors

Financial Services Update September 23, 2015

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 292 Filed: 05/09/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:5667

Case 1:13-cv PLM Doc #8 Filed 12/23/13 Page 1 of 17 Page ID#44

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU

An FTC Perspective on Debt Collection Litigation Reforms

Having a Problem with a Debt Collector? You Also Have Protections

CLIENT ALERT. Collection Practices Guidance After the CFPB - Navy Federal Credit Union Consent Order. October 17, 2016

CFPB Compliance Bulletin Date: July 31, 2017

IN-DEPTH CIVIL SEMINAR RULE 508: DEBT CLAIM RULES

FTC FACTS for Consumers

KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT COMPLAINT. 17 RCW , RCW , and RCW The Attorney General brings this

Solving Money Problems

CFPB Update. GCOR XI April 5, Operational Risk & The Risk Management. The Risk Management Association JOIN. ENGAGE. LEAD.

Fair Debt Collection Practices Act

Voic Messages for Consumers

Case 1:18-cv AMD-RLM Document 1 Filed 07/02/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

A Single Compliance Footprint for Receivables

3 District Court Decisions Highlight Limits To CFPB Claims

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON COMPLAINT

This article shall be known and may be cited as the Colorado Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.

UDAAP and Its Implications

December 19, Director Kathleen Kraninger Consumer Financial Protection Bureau 1700 G Street NW Washington, DC 20552

Road Map To CFPB Compliance For The Auto Finance Industry

Your Money, Your Goals Spotlight Series. Dealing with debt: A closer look

SHAPING THE FUTURE. CFPB HOLDING ITS FIRE

PRESENTED BY: John Thomas Rybak / BB&T ERM Manager

Fair Lending TILA and RESPA Integrated Disclosures ( TRID ) and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ( CFPB )

THE CONSUMER LAW GROUP, P. C.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA. Plaintiff, v. Case No. COMPLAINT

Transcription:

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: September 9, 2015 CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU TAKES ACTION AGAINST THE TWO LARGEST DEBT BUYERS FOR USING DECEPTIVE TACTICS TO COLLECT BAD DEBTS Encore and Portfolio Recovery Associates Must Refund Millions of Dollars and Overhaul Debt Collection and Litigation Practices WASHINGTON, D.C. Today the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) took action against the nation s two largest debt buyers and collectors for using deceptive tactics to collect bad debts. The Bureau found that Encore Capital Group and Portfolio Recovery Associates bought debts that were potentially inaccurate, lacking documentation, or unenforceable. Without verifying the debt, the companies collected payments by pressuring consumers with false statements and churning out lawsuits using robo-signed court documents. The CFPB has ordered the companies to overhaul their debt collection and litigation practices and to stop reselling debts to third parties. Encore must pay up to $42 million in consumer refunds and a $10 million penalty, and stop collection on over $125 million worth of debts. Portfolio Recovery Associates must pay $19 million in consumer refunds and an $8 million penalty, and stop collecting on over $3 million worth of debts. Encore and Portfolio Recovery Associates threatened and deceived consumers to collect on debts they should have known were inaccurate or had other problems, said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. Now, the two biggest debt buyers in the market must refund millions and overhaul their practices. We will continue to take action to protect consumers from illegal and obnoxious debt collection practices. Encore Capital Group, Inc. is headquartered in San Diego, Calif. Its subsidiaries also named in today s action are Midland Funding LLC, Midland Credit Management, and Asset Acceptance Capital Corp. Together, they form the nation s largest debt buyer and collector. Portfolio Recovery Associates is the nation s second largest debt buyer and collector. Portfolio Recovery Associates is a Delaware for-profit corporation headquartered in Norfolk, Va. and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of PRA Group, Inc. As debt buyers, Encore and Portfolio Recovery Associates purchase delinquent or charged-off accounts for a fraction of the value of the debt. Although they pay only pennies on the dollar for the debt, they may attempt to collect the full amount claimed by the original lender. Together, these two companies have purchased the rights to collect over $200 billion in defaulted consumer debts on credit cards, phone bills, and other accounts. The CFPB found that Encore and Portfolio Recovery Associates attempted to collect debts that they knew, or should have known, were inaccurate or could not legally be enforced based on contractual disclaimers, past practices of debt sellers, or consumer disputes. The companies also filed lawsuits against consumers without having the intent to prove many of the debts, winning the vast majority of the lawsuits by default when consumers failed to defend themselves. These practices violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

Collecting Bad Debts Encore and Portfolio Recovery Associates illegally attempted to collect debt that they knew, or should have known, may have been inaccurate or unenforceable. Specifically, the CFPB found that the companies: Attempted to collect on unsubstantiated or inaccurate debt: Encore and Portfolio Recovery Associates stated incorrect balances, interest rates, and payment due dates in attempting to collect debts from consumers. The companies purchased large portfolios of consumer debt with balances that sellers claimed were approximate or that otherwise did not reflect the correct amount owed by the consumer. Sellers also warned the companies that some of the debts they were buying may not have the most recent consumer payments deducted from the balance. Some sellers also represented that documents were not available for some of the accounts. The companies continued purchasing from these sellers and then collecting on that debt without first conducting any investigation to determine whether the debts were accurate and enforceable. Illegal Litigation Practices Encore and Portfolio Recovery Associates collected debts through lawsuits and threats of legal action in unlawful ways. Specifically, the companies: Misrepresented their intention to prove debts they sued consumers over: Encore and Portfolio Recovery Associates regularly attempted to collect on debts by suing consumers in state courts across the country. In numerous cases, the companies had no intention of proving these debts. They placed tens of thousands of debts with law firms staffed by only a handful of attorneys and in many cases made no effort to obtain the documents to back up their claims. Instead, the companies relied on consumers not filing a defense and winning the lawsuits by default. Relied on misleading, robo-signed court filings to churn out lawsuits: Encore and Portfolio Recovery Associates filed affidavits that contained misleading statements in debt collection lawsuits across the country. For example, they both used affidavits that misrepresented that the affiants had reviewed original account-level documentation confirming the consumers debts when they had not. The companies also submitted affidavits with documents attached that they claimed were the consumers specific account contracts or records when they weren t. These shortcuts allowed the companies to churn through lawsuits without doing the research and due diligence required to obtain a legitimate judgment. Sued or threatened to sue consumers past the statute of limitations: From at least July 21, 2011 to March 31, 2013, Encore sent thousands of letters offering a time-limited opportunity to settle without revealing that the debt was too old for litigation. From January 2009 to March 2012, Portfolio

Recovery Associates sent similar letters to consumers. Both of the companies also filed cases past the applicable statute of limitations. Pressured consumers to make payments using misrepresentations: Encore and Portfolio Recovery Associates made other inaccurate statements to consumers to press them to make additional payments. Specifically: o Encore falsely told consumers the burden of proof was on them to disprove the debt: In sworn affidavits, Encore falsely told consumers and courts that the debt should be assumed to be valid because the consumer had not disputed it within a certain time period. In fact, Encore had the burden to first prove the debt was owed and accurate before the consumer had to challenge it. o Portfolio Recovery Associates falsely claimed an attorney had reviewed the file and a lawsuit was imminent: The company s collectors, who identified themselves as from the Litigation Department, misrepresented to consumers that litigation against them was planned, imminent, or even underway. In reality, in many cases, an attorney had not reviewed the account and the company had not decided whether to file suit. Other Illegal Collection Practices: Encore disregarded or failed to adequately investigate consumers disputes: If a consumer disputed their debt more than 45 days after Encore started collecting, Encore would require the consumer to produce specific documents or other proof to support their dispute or it would not conduct the legally-required investigation of the issues raised by the consumer. Encore farmed out disputed debts to law firms without forwarding required information: In numerous instances, Encore assigned disputed debt to law firms and third-party debt collectors without informing them that the debt was disputed. As a result, law firms evaluating Encore accounts for litigation did not know which accounts were disputed. Encore made harassing collection calls to consumers: Encore called consumers repeatedly or continuously with the intent to annoy, abuse, or harass them into paying. Encore s subsidiary, Asset Acceptance, made thousands of calls to consumers before 8 a.m. or after 9 p.m. and called hundreds of consumers more than 20 times in a two-day period. Portfolio Recovery Associates misled consumers into consenting to receive auto-dialed cell phone calls: For approximately a year, and ending in August 2013, Portfolio Recovery Associates told consumers that they could only prevent collection calls to their cell phones before 9 a.m. if they consented

to receive calls on their cell phones from a dialer. The company penalized representatives who failed to adhere to this policy. Enforcement Action Pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, the CFPB has the authority to take action against institutions or individuals engaging in unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts or practices or that otherwise violate federal consumer financial laws. Under the terms of the CFPB orders released today, Encore and Portfolio Recovery Associates are required to: Stop reselling debts: The companies are prohibited from reselling the debts they buy to other debt collectors. This will protect consumers from the potential harm that results when debt collectors continue to sell and resell debts that may be inaccurate or lack the business records and information needed to collect them. Refund millions of dollars to consumers: o Encore must pay up to $42 million in refunds: The company must provide refunds where it collected payments by misrepresenting that it could sue on a time-barred debt or by misrepresenting in court that a debt was assumed valid because the consumer did not previously dispute it. o Portfolio Recovery Associates must pay $19 million in refunds: The company must provide refunds where it collected payments by misrepresenting that an attorney had reviewed a debt or that collectors were calling on behalf of attorneys, and where it collected payments on judgments that it should not have obtained because they were barred by the statute of limitations from suing to collect the debt. Cease collections on millions of dollars of debt: o Encore must stop collecting on $125 million of debt: The company must release or move to vacate all judgments and dismiss all lawsuits where it misrepresented that a debt was assumed valid, and stop any attempts to enforce or collect on these judgments. The face value of this debt is estimated at over $125 million. o Portfolio Recovery Associates must stop collecting on $3 million of debt: The company must release or move to vacate all judgments and dismiss all pending lawsuits it filed past the statute of limitations and stop any attempts to enforce or collect on those judgments, estimated to have a face value of $3.4 million. Stop collecting debts they can t verify: Encore and Portfolio Recovery Associates can t collect unsubstantiated debt. Under the order, they must review original account-level documents verifying a debt before collecting

on it when, for example, a consumer has disputed it, the seller didn t promise it was accurate or valid, or the debt was part of a portfolio they knew included unsupportable or inaccurate information. Ensure accuracy when filing lawsuits: The companies cannot file lawsuits to enforce debts unless they have specific documents and information showing the debt is accurate and enforceable. Provide consumers information before filing suit: Encore and Portfolio Recovery Associates must provide consumers with information about a debt, such as the name of the creditor and charge-off balance, and offer to provide consumers with original documents relating to the account before they are allowed to file a lawsuit or threaten to file suit to collect the debt. Use accurate affidavits: The companies cannot use affidavits to collect debts unless the statements contained in the affidavits specifically and accurately describe the signer s knowledge of the facts and the documents attached. Reform collection of older debts: Encore and Portfolio Recovery Associates are prohibited from suing or threatening to sue to collect on time-barred debt. They also cannot collect on such debt unless they disclose to consumers that they can t sue to collect it. Pay civil money penalties: o Encore must pay a penalty of $10 million to the CFPB s Civil Penalty Fund. o Portfolio Recovery Associates must pay a penalty of $8 million to the CFPB s Civil Penalty Fund. The Encore consent order can be found at: http://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/201509_cfpb_consentorder-encore-capital-group.pdf The Portfolio Recovery Associates consent order can be found at: http://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/201509_cfpb_consent-order-portfolio-recovery-associates-llc.pdf ###