HAZARD DESCRIPTION... 1 LOCATION... 2 EXTENT... 4 HISTORICAL OCCURRENCES... 6 PROBABILITY OF FUTURE EVENTS... 6 VULNERABILITY AND IMPACT...

Similar documents
DAMS BACKGROUND. Page 1 of 7

2009 Ohio Infrastructure Report Card Dams Fact Sheet Grade: C

JANUARY 13, ILL. ADM. CODE CH. I, SEC TITLE 17: CONSERVATION CHAPTER I: DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES SUBCHAPTER h: WATER RESOURCES

Testimony of the Association of State Dam Safety Officials to the Environment and Public Works Committee U.S. Senate March 1, 2017

Requirements for Mapping Levees Complying with Section of the NFIP Regulations

US Army Corps of Engineers Dam Safety

State Conservation Commission

Analysis Item 37: Water Resources Department High-hazard Dams

FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT: A PRESENT AND A 21st CENTURY IMPERATIVE. Gerald E. Galloway, Jr. United States Military Academy

7.0 RISK MANAGEMENT. Table of Contents

ANNEX B: TOWN OF BLUE RIVER

Stronger Storm Water Standards Will Reduce Flood Risks and Cut Costs

LEGAL LIABILITY OF DAM OWNERSHIP IN MONTANA

COMMUNITY SUMMARY LINN COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN CITY OF LISBON

The City of El Paso APPENDIX D DAM RISK INVENTORY ASSESSMENT

COMMUNITY SUMMARY LINN COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN CITY OF CENTRAL CITY

Catastrophe Risk Engineering Solutions

Final Rulemaking 25. Pa. Code Chapter 105 Dam Safety and Waterway Management

Village Glen HOA P.O. Box 1537, Arroyo Grande, CA. Reserve Study

BRITISH COLUMBIA DAM SAFETY REGULATION 44/2000

Implementing risk-based asset management strategies

Managing the Impact of Weather & Natural Hazards. Council Best Practice natural hazard preparedness

CARIBBEAN DEVELOPMENT BANK SUPPORT FOR HAITI TO MEET COMMITMENT TO CARIBBEAN CATASTROPHE RISK INSURANCE FACILITY FOR THE HURRICANE SEASON

ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN

CHAPTER 15: FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT "FP"

DAM SAFETY RISK MANAGEMENT FOR HYDROELECTRIC PROJECTS

APPENDIX H TOWN OF FARMVILLE. Hazard Rankings. Status of Mitigation Actions. Building Permit Data. Future Land Use Map. Critical Facilities Map

National Flood Policy Challenges Levees: The Double-edged Sword

Improving Flood Hazard Identification & Flood Risk Communication: Lessons Learned from Dam Failures in South Carolina

Community Rating System. National Flood Insurance Program

2015 International Workshop on Typhoon and Flood- APEC Experience Sharing on Hazardous Weather Events and Risk Management.

PHASE 2 HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT

*Individualised letter to Mining company CEO/Chair* Address Address Address 5 th April 2019

4.1 Risk Assessment and Treatment Assessing Security Risks

VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

Vocabulary of Flood Risk Management Terms

Southwest Florida Healthcare Coalition

Natural Hazards Risks in Kentucky. KAMM Regional Training

A GUIDE TO BEST PRACTICE IN FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT IN AUSTRALIA

Hazard Vulnerability Assessment for Long Term Care Facilities

Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Kankakee County, Illinois Executive Summary

The Power of Water: How to Prepare and Protect Your Business from Floods

The Citadel. Multi-Hazard Mitigation Disaster Resistant University Plan

Evaluation of marina disaster potential for use in planning and design J. Guerry Taylor Gwcrry 7by/or, f.&, /^c., f.o. Box 70% Mr.

CHAPTER THREE Natural Hazard Mitigation Strategy

SUBJECT: EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT FOR JANUARY 19, 2017 WATER INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE NATION (WIIN) ACT

Emergency Management. Alden Graybill, Recovery / Mitigation Division Manager, OEM

DEPARTMENT OF WATER AFFAIRS. No. R February 2012 NATIONAL WATER ACT, 1998

' New Orleans District. Lake Pontchartrain, Louisiana, and Vicinity (Hurricane Protection) Lower Mississippi Valley Division '---..

LCRA BOARD POLICY 301 FINANCE. April 18, 2018

A. These rules and regulations are promulgated pursuant to the authority conferred by R.I. Gen. Laws

(24 February to date) NATIONAL WATER ACT 36 OF (Gazette No , Notice No See Act for commencement dates)

Future Directions for Civil Works Project Delivery and Partnership

Section 19: Basin-Wide Mitigation Action Plans

Disasters and Localities. Dr. Tonya T. Neaves Director Centers on the Public Service Schar School of Policy and Government

Association of State Floodplain Managers, Inc.

RESERVOIR LEGISLATION IN WALES

Client Risk Solutions Going beyond insurance. Risk solutions for Energy. Oil, Gas and Petrochemical. Start

Infrastructure Investment Ensuring an Effective Economic Recovery Program

Executive Summary. Introduction and Purpose. Scope

This survey is expected to take approximately 20 minutes and must be completed in one session.

CONCHO VALLEY TRANSIT DISTRICT

Non Regulatory Risk MAP Products Flood Depth and Probability Grids

This survey is expected to take approximately 20 minutes and must be completed in one session.

Rationalle for the Sendai Framework for DRR Evidence from the 2009, 2011 and 2013 Global Assessment Report on DRR

Public Assistance: Local, State, Tribal and Non-Profit

WINTER WEATHER PRECAUTIONS. Risk Directory (December 2016)

Village of Blue Mounds Annex

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTION ABOUT FLOODPLAINS Michigan Department of Environmental Quality

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

DISASTER MANAGEMENT MEASURES

Impacts from the July 8, 2013 Storm Event on the City of Toronto

USACE Levee Screening Tool Understanding the Classification

PROJECT INFORMATION DOCUMENT (PID) APPRAISAL STAGE Report No.: AB4291 Project Name. Wenchuan Earthquake Recovery Project Region

Risk-Based Project Management Approach for Large- Scale Civil Engineering Projects

FINAL TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM AWD FLOWS THROUGH FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION AREA July 16, 2012

Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan. Executive Summary

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FUND Department of Environmental Services

MONROE COUNTY 2015 LMS STEP TWO: CHARACTERIZATION FORM

Capitol Region Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Update EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

FLOOD HAZARD AND RISK MANAGEMENT UTILIZING HYDRAULIC MODELING AND GIS TECHNOLOGIES IN URBAN ENVIRONMENT

P art B 4 NATURAL HAZARDS. Natural Hazards ISSUE 1. River Flooding

This discussion provides information related to the damage assessment process and discusses the roles and impact of local and county government.

Regulatory Framework for Dam Safety

DAEN SUBJECT: Little Colorado River at Winslow, Arizona, Flood Risk Management Project

Delaware River Basin Commission s Role in Flood Loss Reduction Efforts

Chapter 10 Mitigation

Hazard Mitigation Overview

Appendix F: Ozark special Road District Addendum

Dade County Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan

Disaster in SDGs. - How can we measure? Youngmi Lee (Statistical Research Institute) Honggyu Sohn (Yonsei Univ.)

Role of Disaster Insurance in Improving Resilience: An Expert Meeting The Resilient America Roundtable

Living with levees: using tolerable risk guidelines in California

The approach to managing natural hazards in this Plan is to: set out a clear regional framework for natural hazard management

Modernization, FEMA is Recognizing the connection between damage reduction and

EvCC Emergency Management Plan ANNEX #11 Hazard Assessment

Private property insurance data on losses

Impacts of severe flood events in Central Viet Nam: Toward integrated flood risk management

Hazard Mitigation Planning

1 Rare Hazard event is not likely to occur within 100 years. 2 Occasional Hazard event is likely to occur within 100 years

Transcription:

DAM FAILURE HAZARD DESCRIPTION... 1 LOCATION... 2 EXTENT... 4 HISTORICAL OCCURRENCES... 6 PROBABILITY OF FUTURE EVENTS... 6 VULNERABILITY AND IMPACT... 6 Hazard Description Dams are water storage, control or diversion structures that impound water upstream in reservoirs. Dam failure can take several forms, including a collapse of, or breach in, the structure. While most dams have storage volumes small enough that failures have few or no repercussions, dams storing large amounts can cause significant flooding downstream. Dam failures can result from any one, or a combination, of the following causes: Prolonged periods of rainfall and flooding, which cause most failures; Inadequate spillway capacity, resulting in excess overtopping of the embankment; Internal erosion caused by embankment or foundation leakage or piping; Improper maintenance, including failure to remove trees, repair internal seepage problems, or maintain gates, valves, and other operational components; Improper design or use of improper construction materials; Failure of upstream dams in the same drainage basin; Landslides into reservoirs, which cause surges that result in overtopping; High winds, which can cause significant wave action and result in substantial erosion; Destructive acts of terrorists; and Earthquakes, which typically cause longitudinal cracks at the tops of the embankments, leading to structural failure. Benefits provided by dams include water supplies for drinking, irrigation and industrial uses; flood control; hydroelectric power; recreation; and navigation. At the same time, dams also represent a risk to public safety. Dams require ongoing maintenance, monitoring, safety inspections, and sometimes even rehabilitation to continue safe service. In the event of a dam failure, the energy of the water stored behind the dam is capable of causing rapid and unexpected flooding downstream, resulting in loss of life and great C O N C H O V A L L E Y H A Z A R D M I T I G A T I O N P L A N U P D A T E

property damage. A devastating effect on water supply and power generation could be expected as well. The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 generated increased focus on protecting the country s infrastructure, including ensuring the safety of dams. One major issue with the safety of dams is their age and the average age of America s 80,000 dams is 51 years. More than 2,000 dams near population centers are in need of repair, according to statistics released in 2009 by the Association of State Dam Safety Officials 1. In addition to the continual aging of dams, there have not been significant increases in the number of safety inspectors resulting in haphazard maintenance and inspection. Location The Association of State Dam Safety Officials estimate that $16 billion will be needed to fix all high-hazard dams, but the total for all state damsafety budgets is less than $60 million 2. The current maintenance budget does not match the scale of America s long-term modifications of its watersheds. Worse still, more people are moving into risky areas. As the American population grows, dams that once could have failed without major repercussions are now upstream of cities and development. The State of Texas has 7,413 dams, all regulated by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). Of these, 854 are considered high-hazard, 779 are considered significant-hazard, and 5,780 are considered low-hazard. According to the American Society of Civil Engineers Report Card, the Association of State Dam Safety Officials reports that there are 403 unsafe dams in Texas. 3 Although classifications for specific dams in the CVCOG area were not provided by TCEQ, location and volume, elevation, and condition information was factored into the risk ranking. Currently, there are 162 dams within the 12 participating counties in the CVCOG Region. 1 Association of State Dam Safety Officials, Journal of Dam Safety 2 Ibid 3 http://www.asce.org/reportcard/pdf/tx.pdf CVCOG Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Page 2

Figure 10-1. Dam Locations in the CVCOG Region CVCOG Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Page 3

Extent The extent or magnitude of a dam failure event is described in terms of the classification of the damages that could result from a dam s failure; not the probability of failure. The National Interagency Committee on Dam Safety defines high hazard dams as those where failure or mis-operation will cause loss of human life. Prior to 2009, high hazard dams were defined as those at which failure or mis-operation would probably cause loss of human life. Dams classified as significant were those at which failure or mis-operation probably would not result in loss of human life but could cause economic loss, environmental damage, disruption of lifeline facilities, or other significant damage. hazard potential dams are those at which failure or mis-operation probably would not result in loss of human life but would cause limited economic and/or environmental losses. Losses would be limited mainly to the owner s property. Classifications for extent after 2009 are found in Table 10-1 below. Table 10-1. Extent Classifications HAZARD POTENTIAL LOSS OF HUMAN LIFE DAM STORAGE CAPACITY None Expected Less than 10,000 acre-feet Significant Probable (1 to 6) Between 10,000 and 100,000 acre-feet High Loss of Life Expected (7 or More) 100,000 acre-feet or more The extent or average magnitude of a dam failure event that could be expected for each county is shown in Table 10-2 based on location data found in Figure 10-1 and the extent classifications in Table 10-1 above. Table 10-2. Extent by Jurisdiction COUNTY EXTENT LEVEL OF INTENSITY TO MITIGATE Coke Significant Dam failure presents a significant threat as the County has at least one high hazard dam and one significant hazard dam, which is in fair condition. Loss of life is probable and economic impact appreciable in the event of a failure. CVCOG Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Page 4

COUNTY EXTENT LEVEL OF INTENSITY TO MITIGATE Concho Crockett Irion Kimble McCulloch Menard Schleicher Sterling Sutton Significant The County only has two significant hazard dams and multiple low hazard dams located in less densely populated areas. Economic losses would be negligible and loss of life is not anticipated in the event of a dam failure. The County has two significant hazard dams and a couple of low hazard dams, therefore loss of life is not probable. All dams located inside the County are considered low hazard dams. The County only has low hazard dams. Loss of life is not expected and any economic loss would be negligible. The County has at least one high hazard dam, one significant hazard dam, and multiple low hazard dams. Loss of life is probable and economic impact appreciable in the event of a failure. One of the county s dams is breached; however this dam is only eight feet with no storage capacity. The county only has low hazard dams, therefore loss of life is not expected in a breach and any economic loss would be negligible. The County only has low hazard dams, both located in the unincorporated areas. Loss of life is not expected and economic impact appreciable in the event of a failure. The County only has one dam and it is a low hazard dam, therefore loss of life is not expected in the event of a failure. Although the County has one significant hazard dam, this dam is not located in a populated area and is listed as being in good condition. CVCOG Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Page 5

COUNTY EXTENT LEVEL OF INTENSITY TO MITIGATE Tom Green Significant Dam failure presents a significant threat as the County has two high hazard dams, one significant hazard dam, and multiple low hazard dams that are located throughout the County. In the event of a dam failure, loss of life is probable and economic loss is appreciable. Historical Occurrences There are about 80,000 dams in the United States today. 4 Catastrophic dam failures have occurred frequently throughout the past century. Between 1918 and 1958, 33 major U.S. dam failures caused 1,680 deaths. From 1959 to 1965, nine major dams failed worldwide. Some of the largest disasters in the U.S. have resulted from dam failures. More than 520 dam incidents, including 21 dam failures, were reported in the past two years to the National Performance of Dams Program, which collects and archives information on dam performance from state and federal regulatory agencies and dam owners. The State of Texas has not experienced loss of life or extensive economic damage due to a dam failure since the first half of the twentieth century. However, due to limited state staff, many incidents are not reported and, therefore, the actual number of incidents is likely to be greater. There has not been a recorded dam failure event for any of the participating jurisdictions in the planning area. Probability of Future Events No historical events of dam failure have been recorded in the CVCOG Region, though the risk of dam failure is monitored closely. Due the lack of historical occurrences, the probability of a future event is unlikely, meaning an event is possible within the next ten years. Vulnerability and Impact Significant and high hazard dams are located in both rural and populated areas in the CVCOG planning area. Although low hazard dams are those at which failure or misoperation probably would not result in loss of human life and would cause limited economic 4 Federal Emergency Management Agency, Dam Safety Program, http://www.fema.gov/hazards/damsafety/ CVCOG Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Page 6

and/or environmental losses, damage to agriculture and housing is possible due to the amount of low hazard dams in each county. Flooding is the most prominent effect of dam failure. If the dam failure is severe, a large amount of water would enter the downstream waterways forcing them out of their banks. There may be significant environmental effects, resulting in flooding that could disperse debris and hazardous materials downstream that can damage local ecosystems. In addition debris carried downstream can block traffic flow, cause power outages, and disrupt local utilities such as water and wastewater. Surge waves resulting from dam breaks have the potential to create major losses. Annualized loss-estimates for dam failure are not available; neither is a breakdown of potential dollar losses of critical facilities, infrastructure and lifelines, or hazardousmaterials facilities. If a major dam should fail, however, the severity of impact could be substantial. A dam breach could result in multiple deaths with facilities being shut down for 30 days or more, and more than 50 percent of property destroyed or damaged. For these reasons, creating mitigations actions to remove or protect people and structures from the path of destruction is necessary in order to minimize impact from dam failure. CVCOG Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Page 7