War Bonds in the Second World War: A Model for a New Iraq/Afghanistan War Bond?

Similar documents
CRS-2 issuance of United States Defense of Freedom Bonds to aid in funding the war against terrorism... S would authorize the issuance of United

The Feasibility of Alternative IMF-Type Stabilization Programs in Mexico,

Veterans Benefits: Pension Benefit Programs

Real or Illusory Growth in an Oil-Based Economy: Government Expenditures and Private Sector Investment in Saudi Arabia

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per re

The U.S. Financial Crisis: Lessons From Sweden

Increases in Tricare Costs: Background and Options for Congress

75th MORSS CD Cover Page UNCLASSIFIED DISCLOSURE FORM CD Presentation

Unemployment Compensation (Insurance) and Military Service

Defense Affordability Expensive Contracting Policies

The Federal Government Debt: Its Size and Economic Significance

Military Base Closures: Role and Costs of Environmental Cleanup

VALIDATION & SURVEILLANCE

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per

Army Commercial Vendor Services Offices in Iraq Noncompliant with Internal Revenue Service Reporting Requirements

CRS Report for Congress

GAO. DEFENSE CONTRACTING Progress Made in Implementing Defense Base Act Requirements, but Complete Information on Costs Is Lacking

ATPA Renewal: Background and Issues

Controls Over Funds Appropriated for Assistance to Afghanistan and Iraq Processed Through the Foreign Military Sales Network

China s Currency: A Summary of the Economic Issues

Financial Innovation in an Islamic Setting: The Case ofpakistan

Saudi Arabia: Measures ojtransition from a Rentier State

Life After Service Study (LASS): How are Canadian Forces Members doing after Transition to Civilian Life?

Testimony The 2014 Long-Term Budget Outlook Douglas W. Elmendorf Director Before the Committee on the Budget U.S. House of Representatives July 16, 20

Financing the U.S. Trade Deficit

July 16, Audit Oversight

Research Study of River Information Services on the US Inland Waterway Network

Author: Robert T. Ford

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

CRS Report for Congress

Impacting PMPM Through Strong Clinical Management AMEDD Example: Redstone Arsenal vs. Ft Anywhere

TRICARE Operations and Policy Update

Oversight Review March 7, 2012

National Defense. Commerce. Assurance Cases. Robert A. Martin Sean Barnum May 2011

Improving the Accuracy of Defense Finance and Accounting Service Columbus 741 and 743 Accounts Payable Reports

DEFENSE SPENDING AND THE ECONOMY. Rudolph G. Penner Director Congressional Budget Office. Before the

Form Approved OMB No. 74- Report Documentation Page Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average hour per respons

Report No. D March 24, Funds Appropriated for Afghanistan and Iraq Processed Through the Foreign Military Sales Trust Fund

METU STUDIES IN DEVELOPMENT

Cost Growth, Acquisition Policy, and Budget Climate

~ industry - - Tht InduJlriaI BankojJUumJ KSC. .,;",~\",~)'I.J ':"l&.ll.4llp;:""; ~I~-, ~~~(;,. :'~\Ii;.'_!).;.JI):/t\~~~J::LoU..h..l~ijpl NO.

Financial Management

East Asia s Foreign Exchange Rate Policies

Financial Management

Defense Finance and Accounting Service Needs to Improve the Process for Reconciling the Other Defense Organizations' Fund Balance with Treasury

PUBLIC BUDGETING AND FlNANCIAL MANAGEML"'IT

Headquarters U.S. Air Force

September 30, The Honorable Tom Coburn, M.D. Ranking Member Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs United States Senate

Modelling the Growth of a Canadian Military Occupation. MORS Personnel and National Security Workshop January 2010

Innovation in Defense Acquisition Oversight: An Exploration of the AT&L Acquisition Visibility SOA

6 Military expenditures and fiscal constraints in Pakistan

Analytical Tools for Affordability Analysis. David Tate Cost Analysis and Research Division Institute for Defense Analyses

Estimating Hedonic Price Indices for Ground Vehicles (Presentation)

CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE CBO The Budget and Economic Outlook: Fiscal Years 2012 to 2022 Deficits or Surpluses (Percen

Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress

On Machin s formula with Powers of the Golden Section

Independent Auditor's Report on the Agreed-Upon Procedures for Reviewing the FY 2011 Civilian Payroll Withholding Data and Enrollment Information

CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web

Foreign Investment in U.S. Securities

Review Procedures for High Cost Medical Equipment

Report No. D

In his Better Buying Power memorandum, the under secretary of Defense (acquisition, technology. Been There, Done That. Got the T-Shirt, Mug, and Hat.

Gifts for Distribution to Individuals

A RISK BASED MODEL FOR DETERMINATION OF INHABITED BUILDING DISTANCE SITING CRITERIA

GAO DEFENSE CONTRACTING. Recent Law Has Impacted Contractor Use of Offshore Subsidiaries to Avoid Certain Payroll Taxes

Report Documentation Page

The Few, The Proud, The Potential Millionaires EWS Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Captain J.C. Schrantz to Major C. Lynn, CG15 19 February

FY2011 Budget Proposals and Projections

EU-U.S. Economic Ties: Framework, Scope, and Magnitude

Military Retirement, Concurrent Receipt, and Related Major Legislative Issues

United States Army Cost and Economic Analysis Center

Army s Audit Readiness at Risk Because of Unreliable Data in the Appropriation Status Report

TOTAL ARMY CAPITAL BUDGETING SEPTEMBER 2002 CENTER FOR ARMY ANALYSIS 6001 GOETHALS ROAD FORT BELVOIR, VA

FOREIGN MILITARY SALES (FMS) WARRANTIES: MAJOR PHILIP L. CUNNINGHAM, USA

CRS Report for Congress

Army Environmental Quality Budget Update

Cost Sharing Cuts Employers' Drug Spending but Employees Don't Get the Savings

Report No. D October 22, Defense Finance and Accounting Service Contract for Military Retired and Annuitant Pay Functions

Report Documentation Page

The Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund

CBO TESTIMONY. Statement of James L. Blum Deputy Director Congressional Budget Office

Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress

FINANCIAL REPORTING FOR THE DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY - GENERAL FUNDS AT DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING SERVICE COLUMBUS

Actions Needed to Mitigate Inconsistencies in and Lack of Safeguards over U.S. Salary Support to Afghan Government Employees and Technical Advisors

GAO FINANCIAL AUDIT. American Battle Monuments Commission s Financial Statements for Fiscal Years 2000 and Report to Congressional Committees

Understanding the Federal Budget 1

Inspector General FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

DEVELOPING COUNTRIES

The Budget Control Act of 2011: The Effects on Spending and the Budget Deficit

United States-Southern African Customs Union (SACU) Free Trade Agreement Negotiations: Background and Potential Issues

NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS

Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

UNITED STATES ARMY PHYSICAL DISABILITY AGENCY

Deficiencies in Journal Vouchers That Affected the FY 2009 Air Force General Fund Statement of Budgetary Resources

COWLES FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH IN ECONOMICS YALE UNIVERSITY

The Trump Administration s March 2017 Defense Budget Proposals: Frequently Asked Questions

ENTERPRISE FOR THE AMERICAS INITIATIVE (EAI) Donald B. Harrington CORE COURSE. The 1980's in Latin America has often been called

Revised November 16, 2007

a GAO GAO INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE Improving Adequacy of Information Systems Budget Justification

Planning and Budgeting for Defense. Cindy Williams Principal Research Scientist

Transcription:

War Bonds in the Second World War: A Model for a New Iraq/Afghanistan War Bond? James M. Bickley Specialist in Public Finance March 1, 2010 Congressional Research Service CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress 7-5700 www.crs.gov R41087

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 01 MAR 2010 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED 00-00-2010 to 00-00-2010 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE War Bonds in the Second World War: A Model for a New Iraq/Afghanistan War Bond? 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Congressional Research Service,Library of Congress,101 Independence Ave, SE,Washington,DC,20540-7500 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 14. ABSTRACT 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified Same as Report (SAR) 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 7 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

Summary The high costs of fighting the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have rekindled congressional interest in the concept of the sale of a Treasury security to help finance these war costs. In the 111 th Congress, three bills have been introduced that would permit the issuance of a war bond: S. 2846, H.R. 4315, and H.R. 4385. Although these bills are silent on any relationship between the proposed war bonds and World War II-era war bonds, the question has been raised whether or not the issuance of war bonds during the Second World War serves as a good model for a new war bond. During the Second World War, war bonds were sold to help finance the cost of national defense. War bonds were simply a new name for already existing U.S. savings bonds. War bonds were aggressively marketed through well organized campaigns, which appealed to citizens sense of patriotism. Their primary purpose was to reduce consumer spending in order to lessen inflationary pressures and black market activity. Also, campaigns to sell war bonds were intended to raise morale by creating a sense of participation in the war effort. The sale of war bonds did reduce consumer spending. Current economic and financial conditions differ from those of the early 1940s. During the Second World War, high inflation and over-employment prevailed. The federal government imposed price and wage controls, production controls, rationing, controls on the level of interest rates on Treasury securities, and regulations on installment loans. As mentioned previously, war bonds were marketed primarily to reduce consumer spending. Today, despite concern about a personal savings rate below historical norms, most federal officials are more concerned about raising consumer spending, because of high unemployment and inadequate aggregate demand. To date, no savings bond or any other Treasury security issue has ever had its funds earmarked for any specific purpose; rather, all funds raised have been placed in the general fund. In summary, the prior war bonds program in the Second World War is a problematic model for Iraq/Afghanistan war bonds. This report will not be updated. Congressional Research Service

Contents Introduction...1 War Bonds in the Second World War...1 Current Savings Bonds...3 Patriot Bonds...3 Conclusion...4 Contacts Author Contact Information...4 Congressional Research Service

Introduction The high costs of fighting the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have rekindled congressional interest in the concept of the sale of a Treasury security to help finance these war costs. In the 111 th Congress, three bills have been introduced that would permit the issuance of a war bond: S. 2846, H.R. 4315, and H.R. 4385. Although these bills are silent on any relationship between the proposed war bonds and World War II-era war bonds, the question has been raised whether or not the issuance of war bonds during the Second World War serves as a good model for a new war bond. On December 8, 2009, Senator E. Benjamin Nelson introduced S. 2846. On December 15, 2009, Representative Michael C. Burgess introduced H.R. 4315. On December 16, 2009, H.R. 4385 was introduced by Representative Kendrick B. Meek. All three bills have the short title of United States War Bonds Act of 2009 and the official title of To authorize the issuance of United States War Bonds to aid in funding of the operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. All three bills are similar and state that the authorized war bonds shall be in such form and denominations, and shall be subject to such terms and conditions of issue, conversion, redemption, maturation, payment, and rate of interest as the Secretary [of the Treasury] may prescribe. In response to congressional attention, this report describes the use of war bonds during the Second World War and examines their relevance as a model for new Iraq/Afghanistan war bonds. This analysis concludes that prior war bonds issued during the Second World War are a problematic model for a new Iran/Afghanistan war bond. War Bonds in the Second World War On March 1, 1935, the first savings bonds (Series A) were issued to provide a savings instrument for small savers and to lower interest costs to the Treasury by expanding the potential market for Treasury securities. 1 This bond was registered and accrued interest at a fixed rate until redeemed. Series B, C, and D, which were similar to Series A, were issued subsequently. Before the Second World War started in Europe, the U.S. economy was still in the Great Depression; hence, unemployment was high, unused productive capacity was extensive, and wholesale and retail prices were declining. After war started in Europe on September 1, 1939, the United States increased defense spending, which was financed by new and higher taxes, cuts in nondefense spending, and an expansion in the national debt. On March 11, 1941, Congress passed the Lend-Lease Act, which empowered the President to provide defense material to foreign governments whose defense the President deems vital to the defense of the United States. 2 1 U.S. Department of the Treasury, Savings Bond Division, A History of the United States Savings Bond Program (Washington: September 1984), p. 5. 2 Paul Studenski and Herman E. Krooss, Financial History of the United States (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., 1963), p. 441. Congressional Research Service 1

Despite higher taxes and cuts in nondefense spending, the large increase in defense-related spending, plus the absorption of a significant proportion of the manpower pool by the armed forces, began generating inflationary pressures as unemployment fell and unused plant capacity diminished. The U.S. government attempted to lessen inflationary pressure by encouraging the general public to buy savings bonds, which were now called defense bonds. 3 On May 1, 1941, the Treasury issued a new savings bond (Series E). Because of the comparatively high rate offered on these securities, a limit of $5,000 (maturity value) was placed on the amount one person could acquire in any one calendar year. 4 After the United States entered the war in December 1941, defense spending soared. Savings bonds were renamed war bonds. During the Second World War, existing taxes were raised, new taxes imposed, and price and wage controls implemented. In addition, production controls were instituted and a rationing system established. The production of many consumer products such as automobiles and refrigerators ended. Controls were imposed on consumer credit and stock market credit. 5 The Treasury and the Federal Reserve fixed interest rates on Treasury securities at low levels to reduce interest costs. The Federal Reserve conducted an easy money policy; hence, the banks had plenty of reserves. Although this policy reduced interest costs, it contributed to inflationary pressures because the money supply expanded. As war production rose, inflationary pressures increased dramatically. Rising employment and extensive overtime resulted in surging growth of wage incomes. Despite higher taxes, workers had more disposable income. In order to assist in lessening inflationary pressures and reducing black market activity, the War Savings Staff at the Treasury managed a series of eight war loan drives. Employees were encouraged to purchase war bonds through payroll deduction plans. While the general population purchased war bonds, the U.S. government decided to promote the purchase of Treasury market-risk securities (bills, notes, bonds, certificates, and tax notes) to large individual and corporate investors. 6 These market-risk securities were simply regular Treasury marketable securities; that is, they were bought and sold on financial markets. Victory Fund Committees consisting of bankers and members of the securities industry were established in each Federal Reserve district to assist the Treasury in marketing both war bonds and marketrisk securities, which were called victory loans. 7 Henry Morgenthau, Secretary of the Treasury, combined the War Savings Staff managed by the Treasury and the Victory Fund Committees into a new organization called the War Finance Division, which reported to the Treasury. 8 From May 1, 1941 through December 1945, the War Finance Division and its predecessors were responsible for the sale of nearly $186 billion worth of government securities. Of this, 3 U.S. Department of the Treasury, Savings Bond Division, p. 11. 4 U.S. Department of the Treasury, Savings Bond Division, p. 7. 5 Margaret G. Myers, A Financial History of the United States (New York: Columbia University Press, 1970), pp. 333-359. 6 U.S. Department of the Treasury, Savings Bond Division, p. 15. 7 Ibid. 8 Ibid. Congressional Research Service 2

more than $54 billion was in the form of War Savings bonds. E bonds alone accounted for $33.7 billion. 9 According to most economic historians, the war loan drives were successful in encouraging the average worker to purchase war bonds and those with greater financial resources to purchase victory loans. These sales absorbed potential consumer spending that would have exacerbated inflation and expanded black market activity. The purchase of war bonds represented much new net savings because small savers had limited alternative saving instruments. The war loan drives had a strong patriotic appeal, involved 6 million volunteers, and utilized extensive donated advertising. Each war loan drive... was a unique fusion of nationalism and consumerism. Seeking to stir the conscience of Americans, it invoked both their financial and moral stake in the war. The sale of war bonds provided a way in which patriotic attitudes and the spirit of sacrifice could be expressed. 10 Neither war bonds nor victory loans were earmarked for defense spending. During the Second World War, however, defense-related spending reached over 90% of federal outlays. Current Savings Bonds Currently, Series EE and Series I savings bonds are being issued. Series EE is the dominant series, as measured by sales. Effective May 1, 2005, Series EE bonds issued on or after May 1, 2005, earn a fixed rate of interest. Interest accrues monthly, compounds semiannually, and is payable at the time of redemption. The bond owner has the option of either deferring income taxes on interest earnings until the time of redemption, or paying federal income taxes as interest accrues. Series I bonds are securities that accrue earnings based on both a fixed rate of return and a semiannual inflation rate. A single, annual rate, called the composite rate, reflects the combined effects of the fixed rate and the semiannual inflation rate. The fixed rate is selected by the Treasury, is in effect when a bond is issued, and applies until the bond matures. The semiannual inflation rate reflects the percentage change in the consumer price index for all urban consumers (CPI-U). No savings bond issue or any other Treasury security issue has ever had its funds earmarked for any specific purpose; rather, all funds raised have been placed in the general fund. Patriot Bonds After the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, both houses of Congress considered and passed differing measures authorizing the sale of so-called war bonds to help give the public a greater sense of participation in the war effort and to provide revenues that could be earmarked for 9 Ibid. 10 War Bonds (Loans), World War Two Advertising History, A project of the Digital Scriptorium: Rare Book, Manuscript, and Special Collections Library, Duke University. Congressional Research Service 3

disaster relief and anti-terrorist actions. On December 11, 2001, the Department of the Treasury designated Series EE savings bonds as Patriot Bonds, whose purpose was to fight the war on global terrorism. 11 The only change, however, was to print the words Patriot Bond on the Series EE bond. 12 Conclusion Economic and financial market conditions today differ so much from those of the Second World War that the prior war bond model is problematic for a new war bond debt issue. The present economy is vastly different from that of the Second World War, which had high inflation and over-employment. During the Second World War, the U.S. government imposed extensive controls on wages, prices, and credit. War bonds were then marketed to reduce consumer spending. The current economy, however has a low rate of inflation and high unemployment. No controls exist on prices, wages, production, interest rates on marketable Treasury securities, or installment loans. No goods and services are rationed. Instead of attempting to reduce consumer spending, federal officials are concerned about increasing consumer spending. Today, the U.S. financial system is more complex, sophisticated, diverse, and deregulated than in the Second World War era. Small savers have an array of savings vehicles. For example, they can invest in money market funds and certificates of deposit (CDs) of financial institutions. Today, savings bonds are almost always a substitute mechanism for other forms of personal savings. Author Contact Information James M. Bickley Specialist in Public Finance jbickley@crs.loc.gov, 7-7794 11 U.S. Department of the Treasury, Treasury Department Unveils Patriot Bond on Anniversary of September 11 Attacks, Treasury News, December 11, 2001, p. 1. 12 U.S. Department of the Treasury, Questions and Answers about Series EE Patriot Bonds, December 2001, p. 1. Congressional Research Service 4