Sims. Teresa v. Fred's, Inc.

Similar documents
Fonseca, Edward v. Rimax Contractors, Inc.

Funez, Victor v. Brothers Concrete Company

Henderson, Debbie v. South Central Communications

Davis, Carlotta v. GCA Services Group, Inc.

Morris, Jimmy v. Spec Personnel, LLC

Richards, Michael v. A-1 Expert Tree Service

Holmes, Daryl v. Ellis Watkins d/b/a Watkins Lawn Care

White, Paul v. G&R Trucking, Inc.

Coker, Alyce v. Fleetwood Homes, Inc.

Ledford, George v. Mid Georgia Courier, Inc.

Barlow, Troy J. v. The Car People, LLC

Limberakis, George v. Pro-Tech Security, Inc.

Whaley, Joyce v. First Tennessee Bank National

Cotton, Alan v. HUMACare, Inc.

Girgis, Kaled v. LaCosta, Inc.

King, Terry De Wayne vs. ARD Trucking Co., Inc.

Foriest, James v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Harper, Randall v. USF Holland Trucking Co.

Osborne, Darry v. Starrun, Inc., et al.

Lamm, Terry v. E. Miller Construction, Inc.

Lepes, Michael v. TA Operating, LLC d/b/a/ Travel Centers of America

Ricketts, David v. Dana Holding Corporation

Hartley, Kevin v. Allen Hammons (General Contractor)

Willis, Joseph v. All Staff

Gilbert, Thomas v. United Parcel Service

Burnett, Jay v. Builders Transportation

Davis, Steven v. RW Tree Service and Stump Removal

Willis, Earl Dwain v. Express Towing

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F COOPER ENGINEERED PRODUCTS, SELF-INSURED EMPLOYER RESPONDENT NO.

Armas, Juan v. Lucas Enamorado

Dugger, Paula v. Home Health Care of Middle TN, LLC

Dennis, Robert, Jr. v. Polymer Components

Poindexter, Robert v. Estes Express Lines

STATE OF ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS & APPEALS ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION

Burleson v. Germantown Partners Supercuts

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F JACOB BOWMAN, Employee. HOLMES ERECTION, Employer

Appealed from the Office of Workers Compensation District 6. Livingston LA. Judgment Rendered February Attorney for.

Jacobs, Thomas Wayne v. Bridgestone Americas

James, Bobby v. Landair Transport, Inc.

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs January 30, 2008

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE. STATE OF TENNESSEE v. GLENDA R. DOTSON

Baumgardner, William v. UPS

Dugger, Paula v. Home Health Care of Middle Tennessee, LLC, et al.

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F ORDER AND OPINION FILED FEBRUARY 16, 2010

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE December 15, 2004 Session

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT JACKSON June 24, 2013 Session

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NUMBER F JERRY F. BLACKLEDGE, EMPLOYEE COOPER STANDARD AUTOMOTIVE, INC.

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs September 20, 2000

Ellis, John v. A Air-One Service

TRICARE Operations Manual M, April 1, 2015 Claims Adjustments And Recoupments

Burnette, Sr., DeWayne v. WestRock

Metro Nashville vs. Angela Coleman, Appellant

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO CA APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ATTALA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI

STATE OF ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS & APPEALS ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION TODD EVANS, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. G HEATHER LAWSON, Employee. SHILOH NURSING & REHAB, Employer

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G JEROME ANDERSON, EMPLOYEE FREIGHT SYSTEMS, INC., EMPLOYER

Batey, Christopher v. Deliver This, Inc.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE DECEMBER 2, 2008 Session

DEFERRAL/WAIVER OF FEES & COSTS. Packet #2. Separate forms from packet before filing.

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 22, 2005

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO WC COA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE July 29, 2014 Session

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY. Trial Court No. CI * * * * *

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F MERIDIAN AGGREGATES, EMPLOYER RESPONDENT NO. 1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs September 2, 2016

Prince William County JDR Model Interrogatories (Support) IN THE JUVENILE AND DOMESTIC RELATIONS DISTRICT COURT OF PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs January 14, 2009

Notice of Rulemaking Hearing

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE January 3, 2007 Session

ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI WILLIAM M. MILEY, JR.

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS ST. PETERSBURG DISTRICT OFFICE

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. G JON HARTMAN, Employee. EXTERIOR SOLUTIONS, INC., Employer

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F DOROTHY JANE DURDEN, EMPLOYEE

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F ALFRED L. BLAIR, EMPLOYEE ACME BRICK COMPANY, EMPLOYER

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F ST. EDWARD MERCY MEDICAL CENTER SISTERS OF MERCY HEALTH, INSURANCE CARRIER/TPA

A M E R I C A N A R B I T R A T I O N A S S O C I A T I O N NO-FAULT/ACCIDENT CLAIMS AWARD OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROFESSIONAL

Rohrenbach, Terry v. Yates Services

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F BOBBY A. CASH, EMPLOYEE NUCOR YAMATO STEEL COMPANY, EMPLOYER

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

CASE NO. 1D Kimberly J. Fernandes of Kelley Kronenberg, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellants.

Form 13.2 Affidavit in Forma Pauperis. The Affidavit in Forma Pauperis must be in the following form:

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

STATE BOARD OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION 270 Peachtree Street, NW Atlanta, Georgia (404)

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA., ) ) Petitioner, ) ) Civil Action File No. vs. ) ), ) ) Respondent. ) ) ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel For the Eighth Circuit

Rulemaking Hearing Rule(s) Filing Form

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS & APPEALS ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT **********

ARBITRATION AWARD. Diana Usten. Esq from Baker Sanders, LLC participated in person for the Applicant

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G CARLOS GIVENS, EMPLOYEE SMITH FIBERCAST, EMPLOYER OPINION FILED DECEMBER 3, 2013

No. 47,017-WCA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * versus * * * * *

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 111,980 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. HAROLD E. HEIER, Appellant,

ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON AUGUST SESSION, 1996

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NOS. F & F OPINION FILED JULY 2, 2014

Transcription:

University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims and Workers' Compensation Appeals Board Law 6-25-2018 Sims. Teresa v. Fred's, Inc. Tennessee Court of Workers Compensation Claims Follow this and additional works at: http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_workerscomp This Expedited Hearing by the Department of Labor and Workforce Development, Court of Workers' Compensation Claims is a public document made available by the College of Law Library and the Department of Labor and Workforce Development, Court of Workers' Compensation claims. For more information about this public document, please contact wc.courtclerk@tn.gov.

FILED Jun 25, 2018 09:06 AM(CT TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT NASHVILLE TERESA SIMS, Docket No. 2018-06-0105 Employee, v. FRED S, INC., State File No. 66673-2016 Employer, SAFETY NATIONAL CASUALTY CORP., Carrier. Judge Joshua Davis Baker EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER GRANTING BENEFITS The Court convened an Expedited Hearing on June 14, 2018. Ms. Sims requested reinstatement of medical and temporary disability benefits that Fred s suspended after the authorized physician refused to operate due to Ms. Sims uncontrolled diabetes. Fred s argued Ms. Sims failure to control her preexisting diabetes rendered her noncompliant. For the reasons below, the Court holds Ms. Sims is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits and orders Fred s to reinstitute her benefits. History of Claim On August 29, 2016, Ms. Sims suffered multiple injuries, including injuries to her ankle and back, when she fell from a truck cab while working for Fred s. Fred s accepted her claim as compensable and provided medical treatment with several physicians, including Dr. Tarek Elalayli. Dr. Elalayli treated Ms. Sims back injury and then referred her to Dr. Roger Passmore. Dr. Passmore diagnosed a calcaneus fracture and recommended surgery, but he then cancelled the surgery because of Ms. Sims uncontrolled diabetes. Ms. Sims testified she sporadically received diabetic treatment for twenty-five years. She had no insurance, so she often purchased insulin and supplies out-of-pocket

and rationed them. Ms. Sims said she could not afford the treatment needed to control her diabetes and allow Dr. Passmore to operate. After Dr. Passmore cancelled the surgery, Fred s suspended Ms. Sims benefits on November 21, 2017, for non-compliance with controlling her insulin levels. Ms. Sims testified she earned no income from that date until she began working for a temporary agency on March 26, 2018. Ms. Sims earned an average weekly wage of $855.32 which translated to a compensation rate of $570.21. Both Drs. Passmore and Elalayli completed Standard Form Medical Reports. Dr. Elalayli reported that Ms. Sims inability to work because of her back injury lasted until January 8. Dr. Passmore provided no date and wrote, Unknown as I have only seen the patient once almost one year after her injury. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Ms. Sims has the burden of proof but need not prove every element of her claim by a preponderance of the evidence to receive relief at an expedited hearing. Instead, Ms. Sims must present sufficient evidence to prove she would likely prevail at a hearing on the merits. McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015. The Court finds she carried this burden and orders Fred s to provide her temporary disability and medical benefits. An employer is required to provide an injured worker such medical and surgical treatment... as ordered by the attending physician... made reasonably necessary by accident. See Tenn. Code Ann. 50-6-204(a(1(A (2017. However, when an employee refuses to accept the medical or specialized medical services the employer is obligated to furnish, then compensation shall be suspended and no compensation shall be due and payable while the injured employee continues to refuse. Id. at 50-6- 204(d(8. Fred s argued Ms. Sims is noncompliant with medical treatment because she neglected to control her diabetes. Fred s also insists it should not be required to act as her private health insurer simply because she lacks coverage to control her diabetes. Ms. Sims asserted her benefits were wrongfully suspended, as she did not refuse treatment, services, or an examination. She emphasized she would not need medical care to manage her diabetes if not for her work injury. She requested reinstatement of her benefits, repayment of accrued benefits, and diabetic treatment to facilitate her ankle surgery. 1 1 Ms. Sims also requested assessment of twenty-five percent penalty under Tenn. Code Ann. section 50-6- 205(b(3(A for Fred s failure to timely pay temporary disability benefits after November 27, 2017. The Court will address this issue via a separate order if necessary. 2

The Workers Compensation Law requires an employer to take an employee as he finds him. See Coleman v. Coker, 321 S.W.2d 540, 541 (Tenn. 1959. When the primary injury is shown to have arisen out of and in the course of employment, every natural consequence that flows from the injury likewise arises out of the employment. See Ogden v. McMinnville Tool and Die, Inc., TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 14, at * 11 (May 7, 2018. Additionally, all the medical consequences and sequelae that flow from a primary injury are compensable. Id. Ms. Sims cited Rogers v. Shaw, 813 S.W.2d 397 (Tenn. 1991 to support her argument that Fred s must provide her diabetic treatment. In Rogers, the Tennessee Supreme Court ordered the employer to pay for heart bypass surgery to treat a preexisting cardiovascular condition because the employee could not have surgery for the work injury without first undergoing the bypass. The Court wrote, Although the experts agreed that the bypass surgery was needed, there was no proof that immediate treatment was required or planned solely due to the heart condition. Id. at 400. Significantly, his need for the bypass surgery did not arise from his preexisting condition but arose instead from his work injury. In determining if Ms. Sims need for diabetic treatment is the direct and natural result of her work injury, the essential issue is whether that treatment is reasonably necessary to treat her work injury. Dr. Passmore recommended surgery for Ms. Sims work injury but refused to operate until her diabetes came under control. Ms. Sims credibly testified that she needs treatment to control her diabetes so she can have surgery, but she cannot afford it. As in Rogers, Ms. Sims needs treatment for her preexisting condition, but she planned no immediate treatment until the workplace accident. In other words, Ms. Sims could continue living with poorly controlled diabetes if not for her work injury. Thus, the Court holds she would likely prevail in proving the reasonableness and necessity of the diabetic treatment at a trial on the merits. The Court further holds Fred s must pay Ms. Sims accrued temporary disability benefits. To recover temporary total disability benefits at an expedited hearing, Ms. Sims must show she would likely prevail at hearing on the merits in proving: (1 she is totally disabled and unable to work due to a compensable injury, (2 the work injury and inability to work are causally connected, and (3 the duration of her disability. Jewell v. Cobble Constr. and Arcus Restoration, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 1, at *21 (Jan. 12, 2015. The Court finds Ms. Sims would likely prevail in proving all three elements at a hearing on the merits. Based on Dr. Elalayli s opinion, her back injury prevented her from working until January 8, 2018. 2 Fred s ended her benefit payments on November 2 Because Dr. Passmore declined to offer his opinion on the C-32 Standard Form Medical Report without further examining Ms. Sims, the Court cannot ascertain whether Ms. Sims would likely prevail in proving entitlement to temporary disability benefits from January 8, until she began working for the temporary agency on March 26, 2018. 3

26, 2018. Fred s must pay Ms. Sims the accrued temporary disability benefits for this six-week period. It is ORDERED as follows: 1. Fred s shall reinstate Ms. Sims medical benefits. 2. Fred s shall pay Ms. Sims $3,421.26 in accrued temporary disability benefits. 3. Fred s shall provide a panel of physicians from which Ms. Sims shall select one to serve as an authorized treating physician for diabetic treatment that would facilitate surgery for her work-related ankle injury. 4. This matter is set for a status conference on Monday, August 27, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. (CDT. You must call 615-741-2113 or toll-free 855-874-0474 to participate in the Hearing. Failure to call may result in a determination of issues without your further participation. 5. Unless interlocutory appeal of the Expedited Hearing Order is filed, compliance with this Order must occur no later than seven business days from the date of entry of this Order as required by Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-239(d(3. The Insurer or Self-Insured Employer must submit confirmation of compliance with this Order to the Bureau by email to WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov no later than the seventh business day after entry of this Order. Failure to submit the necessary confirmation within the period of compliance may result in a penalty assessment for non-compliance. For questions regarding compliance, please contact the Workers Compensation Compliance Unit via email at WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov. ENTERED ON JUNE 25, 2018. Joshua Davis Baker, Judge Court of Workers Compensation Claims 4

APPENDIX Exhibits: 1. Medical Records 2. Ms. Sims Rule 72 Declaration 3. First Report of Injury 4. Wage Statement 5. Notice of Controversy Technical Record: 1. Petition for Benefit Determination 2. Dispute Certification Notice 3. Request for Expedited Hearing 4. Fred s Prehearing Brief 5. Ms. Sims Prehearing Brief 5

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a true and correct copy of this Order was sent to the following recipients by the following methods of service on June, 25th 2018. Name Zachary Wiley, Employee s Attorney Certified Mail Via Fax Via Email X Service sent to: zwiley@forthepeople.com rforrest@forthepeople.com James Tucker, Employer s Attorney X jtucker@manierherod.com Penny Shrum, Court Clerk Court of Workers Compensation Claims Wc.courtclerk@tn.gov 6

Expedited Hearing Order Right to Appeal: If you disagree with this Expedited Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers Compensation Appeals Board. To appeal an expedited hearing order, you must: 1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal, and file the form with the Clerk of the Court of Workers Compensation Claims within seven business days of the date the expedited hearing order was filed. When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must serve a copy upon all parties. 2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten calendar days after filing of the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at any Bureau office or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the alternative, you may file an Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau s website or any Bureau office seeking a waiver of the fee. You must file the fullycompleted Affidavit of Indigency within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will result in dismissal of the appeal. 3. You bear the responsibility of ensuring a complete record on appeal. You may request from the court clerk the audio recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. If a transcript of the proceedings is to be filed, a licensed court reporter must prepare the transcript and file it with the court clerk within ten business days of the filing the Notice of Appeal. Alternatively, you may file a statement of the evidence prepared jointly by both parties within ten business days of the filing of the Notice of Appeal. The statement of the evidence must convey a complete and accurate account of the hearing. The Workers Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board. If the Appeals Board is called upon to review testimony or other proof concerning factual matters, the absence of a transcript or statement of the evidence can be a significant obstacle to meaningful appellate review. 4. If you wish to file a position statement, you must file it with the court clerk within ten business days after the deadline to file a transcript or statement of the evidence. The party opposing the appeal may file a response with the court clerk within ten business days after you file your position statement. All position statements should include: (1 a statement summarizing the facts of the case from the evidence admitted during the expedited hearing; (2 a statement summarizing the disposition of the case as a result of the expedited hearing; (3 a statement of the issue(s presented for review; and (4 an argument, citing appropriate statutes, case law, or other authority. For self-represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667.

Filed Date Stamp Here EXPEDITED HEARING NOTICE OF APPEAL Tennessee Division of Workers' Compensation www.tn.gov/labor-wfd/wcomp.shtml wc.courtclerk@tn.gov 1-800-332-2667 Docket#:--------- State File #/YR: ---- ---- RFA#: Date of Injury:----- ---- SSN: Employee Notice Employer and Carrier Noticeisg~enthat ~~--~~~~---~~~--------~ [List name(s of all appealing party(ies on separate sheet if necessary] appeals the order(s of the Court of Workers' Compensation Claims at -~~~-----~~~~~~~~-to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board. [List the date(s the order(s was filed in the court clerk's office] Judge Statement of the Issues Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal: Additional Information Type of Case [Check the most appropriate item] D D D Temporary disability benefits Medical benefits for current injury Medical benefits under prior order issued by the Court List of Parties Appellant (Requesting Party:.At Hearing: DEmployer DEmployee Address:. Party's Phone:. Email: Attorney's Name: BPR#: ------------ Attorney's Address:. ~~-~~~~----~~---- Phone: Attorney's City, State & Zip code: Attorney's Email: _ *Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellant* LB-1099 rev.4/15 Page 1 of 2 RDA 11082

Employee Name:------------ SF#: DO l: _ Aopellee(s Appellee (Opposing Party:.At Hearing: OEmployer DEmployee Appellee's Address:------------------------------ Appellee's Phone:.Email: _ Attorney's Name: BPR#: -------- Attorney's Address:. Phone: Attorney's City, State & Zip code: - ------------------------ - Attorney's Email:. * Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee * CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, certify that I have forwarded a true and exact copy of this Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal by First Class, United States Mail, postage prepaid, to all parties and/or their attorneys in this case in accordance with Rule 0800-02-22.01(2 of the Tennessee Rules of Board of Workers' Compensation Appeals on this the day of, 20_. [Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant] LB-1099 rev.4/1s Page 2 of 2 RDA 11082

ll... I Tennessee Bureau of Workers' Compensation 220 French Landing Drive, 1-B Nashville, TN 37243-1002 800-332-2667 AFFIDAVIT OF INDIGENCY I,, having been duly sworn according to law, make oath that because of my poverty, I am unable to bear the costs of this appeal and request that the filing fee to appeal be waived. The following facts support my poverty. 1. Full Name: 2. Address:------------- 3. Telephone Number:--------- 4. Date of Birth:----------- 5. Names and Ages of All Dependents: ----------------- Relationship:------------- ----------------- Relationship:------------- ---------------- - Relationship:------------- ----------------- Relationship:------------- 6. I am employed by:------------------------------,- My employer's address is:------------------------- My employer's phone number is:----------------------- 7. My present monthly household income, after federal income and social security taxes are deducted, is: $ 8. I receive or expect to receive money from the following sources: AFDC $ per month beginning SSI $ per month beginning Retirement $ per month beginning Disability $ per month beginning Unemployment $ per month beginning Worker's Camp.$ per month beginning Other $ per month beginning LB-1108 (REV 11/15 RDA 11082

9. My expenses are: ' ;! ' Rent/House Payment $ per month Medical/Dental $ per month Groceries $ per month Telephone $ per month Electricity $ per month School Supplies $ per month Water $ per month Clothing $ per month Gas $ per month Child Care $ per month Transportation $ per month Child Support $ per month Car $ per month Other $ per month (describe: 10. Assets: Automobile $ Checking/Savings Acct. $ House $ Other $ (FMV - --------- (FMV---------- Describe: 11. My debts are: Amount Owed To Whom I hereby declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing answers are true, correct, and complete and that I am financially unable to pay the costs of this appeal. APPELLANT Sworn and subscribed before me, a notary public, this dayof,20 NOTARY PUBLIC My Commission Expires: LB-1108 (REV 11/15 RDA 11082