Impacting PMPM Through Strong Clinical Management AMEDD Example: Redstone Arsenal vs. Ft Anywhere

Similar documents
TRICARE Operations and Policy Update

The Feasibility of Alternative IMF-Type Stabilization Programs in Mexico,

75th MORSS CD Cover Page UNCLASSIFIED DISCLOSURE FORM CD Presentation

Real or Illusory Growth in an Oil-Based Economy: Government Expenditures and Private Sector Investment in Saudi Arabia

Life After Service Study (LASS): How are Canadian Forces Members doing after Transition to Civilian Life?

Research Study of River Information Services on the US Inland Waterway Network

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per re

VALIDATION & SURVEILLANCE

Modelling the Growth of a Canadian Military Occupation. MORS Personnel and National Security Workshop January 2010

Veterans Benefits: Pension Benefit Programs

Defense Affordability Expensive Contracting Policies

Saudi Arabia: Measures ojtransition from a Rentier State

Increases in Tricare Costs: Background and Options for Congress

Improving the Accuracy of Defense Finance and Accounting Service Columbus 741 and 743 Accounts Payable Reports

Author: Robert T. Ford

Financial Management

Army Commercial Vendor Services Offices in Iraq Noncompliant with Internal Revenue Service Reporting Requirements

Unemployment Compensation (Insurance) and Military Service

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

GAO. DEFENSE CONTRACTING Progress Made in Implementing Defense Base Act Requirements, but Complete Information on Costs Is Lacking

Military Base Closures: Role and Costs of Environmental Cleanup

METU STUDIES IN DEVELOPMENT

Defense Finance and Accounting Service Needs to Improve the Process for Reconciling the Other Defense Organizations' Fund Balance with Treasury

Analytical Tools for Affordability Analysis. David Tate Cost Analysis and Research Division Institute for Defense Analyses

National Defense. Commerce. Assurance Cases. Robert A. Martin Sean Barnum May 2011

PUBLIC BUDGETING AND FlNANCIAL MANAGEML"'IT

Headquarters U.S. Air Force

Testimony The 2014 Long-Term Budget Outlook Douglas W. Elmendorf Director Before the Committee on the Budget U.S. House of Representatives July 16, 20

Cost Growth, Acquisition Policy, and Budget Climate

Innovation in Defense Acquisition Oversight: An Exploration of the AT&L Acquisition Visibility SOA

Review Procedures for High Cost Medical Equipment

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per

War Bonds in the Second World War: A Model for a New Iraq/Afghanistan War Bond?

Controls Over Funds Appropriated for Assistance to Afghanistan and Iraq Processed Through the Foreign Military Sales Network

Financial Innovation in an Islamic Setting: The Case ofpakistan

6 Military expenditures and fiscal constraints in Pakistan

~ industry - - Tht InduJlriaI BankojJUumJ KSC. .,;",~\",~)'I.J ':"l&.ll.4llp;:""; ~I~-, ~~~(;,. :'~\Ii;.'_!).;.JI):/t\~~~J::LoU..h..l~ijpl NO.

Oversight Review March 7, 2012

July 16, Audit Oversight

Estimating Hedonic Price Indices for Ground Vehicles (Presentation)

CRS Report for Congress

The Few, The Proud, The Potential Millionaires EWS Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Captain J.C. Schrantz to Major C. Lynn, CG15 19 February

Independent Auditor's Report on the Agreed-Upon Procedures for Reviewing the FY 2011 Civilian Payroll Withholding Data and Enrollment Information

United States Army Cost and Economic Analysis Center

The Federal Government Debt: Its Size and Economic Significance

US Army Reserve Personnel Center

UNITED STATES ARMY PHYSICAL DISABILITY AGENCY

On Machin s formula with Powers of the Golden Section

China s Currency: A Summary of the Economic Issues

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Department of Defense Medicare Eligible Retiree Health Care Fund Operations

Gifts for Distribution to Individuals

Financial Management

Army s Audit Readiness at Risk Because of Unreliable Data in the Appropriation Status Report

A RISK BASED MODEL FOR DETERMINATION OF INHABITED BUILDING DISTANCE SITING CRITERIA

Report No. D

Report Documentation Page

The Cost and Economic Analysis Program

Army Environmental Quality Budget Update

CRS Report for Congress

Cost Sharing Cuts Employers' Drug Spending but Employees Don't Get the Savings

Report No. D March 24, Funds Appropriated for Afghanistan and Iraq Processed Through the Foreign Military Sales Trust Fund

The Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund

Form Approved OMB No. 74- Report Documentation Page Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average hour per respons

September 30, The Honorable Tom Coburn, M.D. Ranking Member Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs United States Senate

MAINTAINABILITY DATA DECISION METHODOLOGY (MDDM)

DEFENSE SPENDING AND THE ECONOMY. Rudolph G. Penner Director Congressional Budget Office. Before the

AFSO21 / D&SWS / Tech Development: Air Force Initiative High Confidence Technology Transition Planning Through the Use of Stage-Gates (TD-13)

Controls Over Collections and Returned Checks at Defense Finance and Accounting Service, Indianapolis Operations

Total Cost of Care in Oregon s Commercial Market. February 24, 2017

The U.S. Financial Crisis: Lessons From Sweden

ATPA Renewal: Background and Issues

FOREIGN MILITARY SALES (FMS) WARRANTIES: MAJOR PHILIP L. CUNNINGHAM, USA

Total Cost of Care in Oregon s Commercial Market. March 2, 2017

Report No. D October 22, Defense Finance and Accounting Service Contract for Military Retired and Annuitant Pay Functions

AMSAA TECHNICAL REPORT NO. TR CONFIDENCE INTERVAL METHODOLOGY FOR RATIO MEANS (CIM4RM) AUGUST 2010

TO Approved for public release, distribution unlimited

Financing the U.S. Trade Deficit

Report Documentation Page

NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL THESIS

TOTAL ARMY CAPITAL BUDGETING SEPTEMBER 2002 CENTER FOR ARMY ANALYSIS 6001 GOETHALS ROAD FORT BELVOIR, VA

CONDENSED FINANCIAL REPORT

Risk Management. TARDEC Systems Engineering Workshop June 2, 2011

Health Plans Dashboard

A Study of Outpatient Pharmacy Utilization at Naval Hospital, Camp Lejeune. John G. Meeting, LTJG, MSC, USNR

CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE CBO The Budget and Economic Outlook: Fiscal Years 2012 to 2022 Deficits or Surpluses (Percen

versight eport Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

East Asia s Foreign Exchange Rate Policies

Clinic Comparison Reporting. June 30, 2016

Inspector General FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Deficiencies in Journal Vouchers That Affected the FY 2009 Air Force General Fund Statement of Budgetary Resources

NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS

Form Approved OMB No Report Documentation Page Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per

In his Better Buying Power memorandum, the under secretary of Defense (acquisition, technology. Been There, Done That. Got the T-Shirt, Mug, and Hat.

versight eport Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

GAO DEFENSE CONTRACTING. Recent Law Has Impacted Contractor Use of Offshore Subsidiaries to Avoid Certain Payroll Taxes

US ARMY CIVILIAN APPELLATE REVIEW AGENCY

Report Documentation Page

NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL THESIS

DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION

a GAO GAO INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE Improving Adequacy of Information Systems Budget Justification

Transcription:

2011 Military Health System Conference Impacting PMPM Through Strong Clinical Management AMEDD Example: Redstone Arsenal vs. Ft Anywhere The Quadruple Aim: Working Together, Achieving Success COL Rob Goodman 26 January, 2011 Army OTSG PAE

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Oations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no son shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 26 JAN 2011 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED 00-00-2011 to 00-00-2011 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Impacting PMPM Through Strong Clinical Management: AMEDD Example: Redstone Arsenal vs. Ft Anywhere 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Army Medical Command,Army Office The Surgeon General PAE,Fort Sam Houston,TX,78234 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES presented at the 2011 Military Health System Conference, January 24-27, National Harbor, Maryland 14. ABSTRACT 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified Same as Report (SAR) 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 13 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

PMPM 101 Key Terms Equivalent Lives Amount of care used by demographically similar groups (based on Age, Gender & BenCat) relative to the amount of care used by the average enrollee (1.00). Unit Cost Direct Care (DC) Inpatient and Outpatient MEPRS Cost unit of care (RWP and APG respectively) by location where care is provided. Utilization Amount of care (i.e., number of RWPs and/or APGs) provided to enrollees. APG (Ambulatory Patient Group) Classification system designed to explain the amount and type of resources used in ambulatory visits that: Predicts the average pattern of resource use for a group of patients by combining procedures, medical visits and/or ancillary tests that share similar characteristics and resource utilization. Provides greater weights for higher intensity services and lesser weights for lower intensity services 2011 2 MHS Conference

PMPM 101 Calculation Components Work Center Unit DC Institutional (Inpatient) RWPs DC Professional (Outpatient) *APGs DC Ancillary (Radiology & Lab Only) *APGs DC Inpatient & Outpatient Expenses **MEPRS A&B Purchased Care (PC) Inpatient and Outpatient Claims ($$) DC, PC & TMOP Pharmacy Actual Costs Population Enrollees Unit Equivalent Lives * APGs account for Outpatient weighted workload (RVUs) and associated Ancillary weighted workload **Labor (L) plus Non-Labor (NL) expenses (12 month rolling average) Inpatient NL Expenses (A Codes)= Total expenses minus L & depreciation Outpatient NL Expenses (B Codes)= Total expenses minus L, depreciation, & Pharmacy Step-down 2011 3 MHS Conference

PMPM 101 Basic Calculation Numerator DC Outpatient Costs: Number of APGs provided to Enrollees multiplied by Cost APG of the location where care was provided. Cost APG is derived by multiplying total APGs generated at location by the Outpatient Expenses of location. + DC Inpatient Costs: Number of RWPs provided to Enrollees multiplied by Cost RWP of the location where care was provided. Cost RWP is derived by multiplying total RWPs generated at location by the Inpatient Expenses of location. + Pharmacy Costs: pulled directly from database (no calculation) + PC Inpatient and Outpatient Costs: direct claims data (no calculation) Denominator Equivalent Lives

PMPM 101 Drivers Enrollee Market Share Enrollees Enrolled to MTF vs. MCSC Population (Equivalent Lives) Change in Population Demographics PMPM Purchased Care (Inpatient & Outpatient) Institutional Professional Pharmacy *Ancillary Cost RWP Discharge Beneficiary year Cost RVU RVU son year Cost Script Scripts son year Cost test Tests son year Personnel Hours Occupied BedDay (OBD) Workload Sent to Network RVU/ Provider/ Month Support staff labor hours encounter % TMOP % Retail Pharmacy % MTF *Ancillary is wrapped into the APGs

Why Redstone vs. Ft. Anywhere Common factors Small MTFs with Ambulatory Oations Only Have downsized over past several years Slated to move to Business Only Oations (BO2) Why Redstone HA data included them as possible choice of good news story Data reflects relatively low PMPM Data reflects relatively slow upward trend in PMPM Why Ft. Anywhere Data reflects relatively high PMPM Data reflects relatively sharp upward trend in PMPM

Why Redstone vs. Ft. Anywhere $400 Redstone vs, Ft Anywhere PMPM $350 $300 $250 $200 $150 $100 $50 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2007 2008 2009 2010 FOX AHC REDSTONE ARSENAL FT ANYWHERE

What Redstone did Right Expenses $3,000,000 Redstone Cost/APG vs. Expenses $250 Labor and Non Labor Expense $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $200 $150 $100 $50 Cost/APG 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 2007 2008 2009 2010 Sum of Calc Cost/APG Sum of R12 Non Labor Exp Sum of Labor Exp

What Redstone did Right Workload 30,000 Redstone Cost/APG vs. APGs $250 25,000 $200 APGs 20,000 15,000 10,000 $150 $100 Cost/APG 5,000 $50 0 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 2007 2008 2009 2010 Sum of Calc Cost/APG Sum of Aggregate APG Weight

What Redstone did Right Population (Equivalent Lives) 39500 Redstone Equivalent Lives vs. PMPM $300 39000 $250 38500 $200 Eq Lives 38000 37500 $150 PMPM 37000 $100 36500 $50 36000 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2007 2008 2009 2010 FOX AHC REDSTONE ARSENAL Sum of Calc Cost/Eq FOX AHC REDSTONE ARSENAL Sum of PMPM Equivalent Lives

What Ft. Anywhere did Wrong Expenses $6,000,000 Ft Anywhere Cost/APG vs. Expenses $250 Labor & Non Labor Expenses $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $200 $150 $100 $50 Cost/APG 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 2007 2008 2009 2010 Sum of Calc Cost/APG Sum of R12 Non Labor Exp Sum of Labor Exp

What Ft. Anywhere did Wrong Workload 50,000 45,000 40,000 35,000 Ft Anywhere Cost/APG vs. APGs $250 $200 APGs 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 $150 $100 $50 Cost/APG 0 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 2007 2008 2009 2010 Sum of Calc Cost/APG Sum of Aggregate APG Weight

What Ft. Anywhere did Wrong Population (Equivalent Lives) 60,000 Ft Anywhere Equivalent Lives vs. PMPM $400 50,000 40,000 $350 $300 $250 Eq Lives 30,000 $200 PMPM 20,000 $150 $100 10,000 $50 0 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2007 2008 2009 2010 FT ANYWHERE Sum of Calc Cost/Eq FT ANYWHERE Sum of PMPM Equivalent Lives