) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JOSEPH MOCK SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

Similar documents
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) UPDATED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF S. NASIM AHMED SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

Southern California Gas Company. and. San Diego Gas & Electric Company. Pipeline Safety Reliability Project. Application (A.

CHAPTER X DIRECT TESTIMONY OF MARJORIE SCHMIDT-PINES (RATES) ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF GARY LENART ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

SDG&E DIRECT TESTIMONY OF IFTEKHARUL (SHARIM) CHAUDHURY (PRESENT AND PROPOSED GAS TRANSPORTATION REVENUE AND RATES)

CHAPTER XII DIRECT TESTIMONY OF SHARIM CHAUDHURY ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

REVISED UPDATED PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JASON BONNETT SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF RYAN HOM (UPDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS REPORT) January 2018

Company: Southern California Gas Company (U 904 G) Proceeding: 2019 General Rate Case Application: A Exhibit: SCG-46-R REVISED SOCALGAS

THIRD REVISED SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF IFTEKHARUL (SHARIM) CHAUDHURY (PRESENT AND PROPOSED GAS TRANSPORTATION REVENUE AND RATES) July 31, 2018

REVISED SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF GARY G. LENART (REVENUES AT PRESENT AND PROPOSED RATES) March 2015

SECOND REVISED SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF IFTEKHARUL (SHARIM) CHAUDHURY (PRESENT AND PROPOSED GAS TRANSPORTATION REVENUE AND RATES) April 6, 2018

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF KHAI NGUYEN ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

CHAPTER IV DIRECT TESTIMONY OF KAREN C. CHAN ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

January 12, 2017 Advice Letter 5070

PREPARED SUPPLEMENTAL TESTIMONY OF SIM-CHENG FUNG SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

) ) ) ) ) ) ) REVISED REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF STEVE WATSON SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

CHAPTER 4 COST RECOVERY AND REGULATORY TREATMENT PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF REGINALD M. AUSTRIA ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

CHAPTER V PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF REGINALD M. AUSTRIA ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

CHAPTER VII DIRECT TESTIMONY OF PATRICK MOERSEN (OVERHEADS) ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

CHAPTER III COST TRACKING & REGULATORY TREATMENT PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JOHNNY M. HULEIS

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF SHARIM CHAUDHURY ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY (RATE DESIGN)

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

CHAPTER III COST TRACKING AND REGULATORY TREATMENT PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF REGINALD M. AUSTRIA ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

January 29, 2018 Advice Letter 5133-G

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF GARRY G. YEE ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

SoCalGas Response 01: a & b. Please refer to the schedule on next page.

Subject: Core Pricing Flexibility and Noncore Competitive Load Growth Opportunities Programs

Conceptually what specific costs should the compression rate adder recover?

CHAPTER III PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF EDWARD J. REYES

SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF REGINALD M. AUSTRIA (REGULATORY ACCOUNTS) November 2014

CHAPTER VIII DIRECT TESTIMONY OF NEIL CAYABYAB (INSURANCE) ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

July 1, 2015 Advice Letter: 4814-G. Advice Letter 4814-G is effective as of June 29, 2015 with corresponding Tariffs effective as of July 1, 2015.

PREPARED REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF SCOTT R. WILDER ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY (PHASE 2)

CHAPTER II NEW CURTAILMENT ORDER PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF STEVE WATSON BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SCHEDULE GTC Sheet 3

SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF GARRY G. YEE RATE BASE. November 2014

SDG&E DIRECT TESTIMONY OF NORMA G. JASSO (REGULATORY ACCOUNTS) November 2014

QUESTION 6.1: RESPONSE 6.1:

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

CHAPTER 5 REVENUE REQUIREMENT PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF KAREN C. CHAN AND RAMON GONZALES ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

1. Following is Question 13 of Clean Energy s Third Data Request and SoCalGas response to the data request:

REVISED SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF RONALD M. VAN DER LEEDEN POST-TEST YEAR RATEMAKING. March 2015

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF TODD J CAHILL ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

Testimony of Stephen E. Pickett

February 10, 2016 Advice Letter 4896

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

December 5, Advice No (U 904 G) Public Utilities Commission of the State of California

December 14, 2016 Advice Letter 5053

June 5, Advice No (U 904 G) Public Utilities Commission of the State of California. Subject: Schedule No. G-CPS May 2018 Cash-Out Rates

REVISED PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF TODD J. CAHILL ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

SECOND REVISED SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF ANNETTE M. STEFFEN (MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES) April 6, 2018

CHAPTER X DIRECT TESTIMONY OF NEIL CAYABYAB ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

March 7, 2018 Advice Letter 5234-G. SUBJECT: Modification of the New Environmental Regulation Balancing Account (NERBA).

DIRECT TESTIMONY OF AMANDA D. WHITE SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

SDG&E REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF CYNTHIA S. FANG (ELECTRIC RATES AND BILL COMPARISON) JUNE 18, 2018

SECOND REVISED SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JAWAAD A. MALIK (POST-TEST YEAR RATEMAKING) April 6, 2018

FOR TRANSMISSION LEVEL CUSTOMERS. (Continued)

SECOND REVISED SDG&E DIRECT TESTIMONY OF KENNETH J. DEREMER (POST-TEST YEAR RATEMAKING) April 6, 2018

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY ADVANCED METERING INFRASTRUCTURE CHAPTER VII SOCALGAS AMI BUSINESS CASE MODELING METHODOLOGY AND REVENUE REQUIREMENT

March 28, 2018 Advice Letter 5257-G

With the first paragraph above in mind, please respond to the following:

SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF MICHELLE A. SOMERVILLE MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES. November 2014

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF MICHAEL W. FOSTER ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

August 15, 2017 Advice Letter 5167-G

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JONATHAN B. ATUN CHAPTER 4 ON BEHALF OF SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

(DATA REQUEST CAL ADVOCATES-DR-033)

July 7, 2015 Advice Letters: 4668-G & 4718-G. SUBJECT: Request for Approval of Interruptible Transportation Capacity Contracts with Affiliates

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Residential Line and Service Extension Allowance Testimony. Application No.: Witnesses: C. Silsbee S. Reed J. Schichtl L. Vellanoweth (U 338-E)

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY Revised CAL. P.U.C. SHEET NO. LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA CANCELING Revised CAL. P.U.C. SHEET NO.

November 16, Advice Letter 5178-A

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF ROBERT C. LANE ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF HUGO MEJIA ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

SECOND REVISED SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF KAREN C. CHAN (WORKING CASH) APRIL 6, 2018

April 4, 2014 Advice Letter 4616-G

July 25, Advice 2473-G (Pacific Gas and Electric Company ID U 39 G) Public Utilities Commission of the State of California

a. Please describe the scope of safety concerns that the curtailment rules seek to address.

SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY 2013 TRIENNIAL COST ALLOCATION PROCEEDING (A )

ALJ/CAB/avs Mailed 11/25/2002

May 22, Advice No A (U 904 G) Public Utilities Commission of the State of California

CHAPTER 13 AMI FINANCIAL MODELING. JULY 14, 2006, AMENDMENT Prepared Supplemental, Consolidating, Superseding and Replacement Testimony of SCOTT KYLE

NOTICE OF SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY S REQUEST TO INCREASE ELECTRIC RATES FOR 2016 ERRA FORECAST APPLICATION NO. A

APPLICABILITY TERRITORY. Applicable throughout the service territory. RATES. Customer Charge. Per meter, per day:

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY Revised CAL. P.U.C. SHEET NO G LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA CANCELING Original CAL. P.U.C. SHEET NO.

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

March 8, 2018 Advice Letter 5224-G

Please note: In accordance with Gas Accord D , as of March 1, 2001, customers may no longer take service under Schedule G-CSP.

Para más detalles en Español llame al BACKGROUND KEY REASONS WHY SDG&E IS ASKING FOR INCREASES ARE:

July 17, 2013 Advice Letter 4504

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY 2016 PHASE II TCAP

SOCALGAS/SDG&E REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF SHARIM CHAUDHURY (GAS RATES AND BILL COMPARISON & DAILY CORE DEMAND FORECAST GROUP) JUNE 18, 2018

Southern California Gas Company Annual Report on the Gas Cost Incentive Mechanism April 1, 2010 through March 31, 2011

RULE 25 Sheet 2. J. Firm Intrastate Transportation Service. Customers who qualify for this service will be responsible for

SDG&E DIRECT TESTIMONY OF STEVEN P. DAIS (WORKING CASH) October 6, 2017 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Transcription:

Application No: Exhibit No.: Witness: A.1-1-xxx Joseph Mock Application of Southern California Gas Company (U 90 G and San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U 90 G For Authority To Recover North-South Project Revenue Requirement In Customer Rates And For Approval Of Related Cost Allocation And Rate Design Proposals A.1-1-xxx (Filed December 0, 01 DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JOSEPH MOCK SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA December 0, 01

TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PURPOSE...1 II. RATE IMPACTS...1 III. QUALIFICATIONS... - i -

DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JOSEPH MOCK I. PURPOSE The purpose of my direct testimony on behalf of Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas and San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E (collectively, Utilities is to provide illustrative rate impacts for the proposed North-South Project based on the incremental transportation revenue requirements included in this application. II. RATE IMPACTS The North-South Project (Project proposed by the Utilities in this application includes 9 10 11 1 1 constructing new backbone transmission pipeline between the Adelanto and Moreno Stations and the Moreno and Whitewater Stations, as well as rebuilding the Adelanto Compressor Station. The details of the Project are provided in the testimony of Mr. Buczkowski, while Mr. Bisi notes that the Project enhances the reliability and flexibility of the transmission system. The Utilities propose 1 to allocate the incremental gas transportation revenue requirements associated with the 1 Project to its Backbone Transportation Service (BTS rates. The BTS rates, which are designed 1 1 1 1 19 to recover the costs of the backbone transmission system, can be likened to postage-stamp rates. Effectively, customers pay a common rate to deliver gas along the backbone transmission system from any receipt point to the SoCalGas Citygate. From there, customers may then deliver gas to their end-use account at the appropriate Citygate-to-meter transportation rate. Alternatively, customers can purchase gas at the Citygate without directly purchasing backbone capacity. 1 Unless modified in a future Cost Allocation Proceeding. At SoCalGas, cost allocation proceedings, or TCAPs, are currently on three year cycles, with the most recently filed proceeding, A.11-11-00, awaiting a final decision from the Commission. There should be at least one additional TCAP proceeding before the estimated in-service date of 019 for the North-South Project. BTS is available on both a firm and interruptible basis. Firm service is available under either a Straight Fixed Variable (i.e. 100% reservation charge or Modified Fixed Variable (i.e. part reservation, part volumetric charge. Interruptible service charges are 100% volumetric. - 1 -

Table 1 below provides the illustrative BTS Straight Fixed Variable (SFV rate impact of the Project. testimony. The rates shown assume the forecasted revenue requirements included in Mr. Yee s As Mr. Yee explains, the revenue requirements to be ultimately collected in rates 9 10 will be trued-up for actual costs at the conclusion of the Project. The first year s revenue requirement, if placed in rates on a date other than January 1, will be adjusted to ensure it is fully collected over the remaining months in the year. For example, if the Project is placed into service on November 0, 019 then the revenue requirement in rates will be adjusted for the one month remaining in 019. Mr. Ahmed s testimony proposes to establish the North-South Infrastructure Memorandum Account (NSIMA, which is also proposed to be allocated to the BTS rate. Current BTS Revenue Requirement $ Millions North-South Project Revenue Requirement $ Millions TABLE 1 Illustrative BTS Revenue and Rate Impacts Total BTS Revenue Requirement $ Millions Current BTS SFV Rate $/dth/d North-South Project BTS Rate Impact $/dth/d Total BTS SFV Rate $/dth/d A B C = A + B D E F = D + E 019 $19. $1.* $0.9 $0.1 $0.0 $0.0 00 $19. $1.0 $. $0.1 $0.11 $0. 01 $19. $11. $. $0.1 $0.10 $0. 0 $19. $11. $. $0.1 $0.10 $0. 0 $19. $109.9 $9. $0.1 $0.101 $0.9 * 019 Revenue Requirement of $.9MM is grossed-up to $1. million in order to recover the amount over 1 month due to the assumed in-service date of November 0, 019. 11 Customers who directly purchase firm BTS capacity from SoCalGas will be impacted as 1 shown in Table 1. However, most end-use customers do not directly pay the BTS rate. Core 1 customers indirectly pay for BTS through the core procurement tariff. Core Aggregation The rate impact is calculated using the same BTS denominator of,9 Mdth/day that is used for the current BTS rate. This denominator is updated annually to reflect actual BTS capacity utilization. Table 1 shows the rate impact for only the first five years after the estimated in-service date of the Project. As Mr. Yee s testimony shows, the Project will have corresponding revenue requirements beyond this period. Short term firm as well as interruptible service is available at market based prices up to the full tariffed rates listed in Table 1. - -

Transportation and noncore customers who procure their gas commodity from a marketer or at the Citygate indirectly pay for BTS as it is a likely cost of business for market participants providing gas commodity to them. Since these customers transportation (i.e. Citygate-tometer rates are not impacted by this proposal, an alternative method of illustrating the rate impact of the Project on them is to observe bundled rate impacts that include a proxy gas commodity price. The proposed peak BTS rate impact (Year 00 from Table 1 of $0.11 per decatherm (converted to $0.011 per therm for Table is added to these bundled rates to approximate the Project s impact. These illustrative rates are provided below in Table. TABLE Illustrative Bundled Rate Impacts of North-South Project Current Class- Average Transportation Rates* Gas Commodity Price** Bundled Rate/Bill North-South Project BTS Rate Impact*** % impact on bundled rates/bills A B C = A+B D E = D / C 1 SoCalGas Residential $/th $0. $0.09 $0.99 $0.011 1.% Average Residential Bill $/month (9 th $.09 $1. $.9 $0. 1.% Core C&I $/th $0.0 $0.09 $0.1 $0.011 1.% NGV $/th $0.0 $0.09 $0. $0.011.% Noncore C&I - Distribution $/th $0.0 $0.09 $0. $0.011.% Noncore C&I - TLS $/th $0.0 $0.09 $0. $0.011.% 9 Electric Generation - Distribution $/th $0.09 $0.09 $0.9 $0.011.% 10 Electric Generation - TLS $/th $0.0 $0.09 $0. $0.011.% 11 1 SDG&E 1 Residential $/th $0.9 $0.10 $1.19 $0.011 1.0% 1 Average Residential Bill $/month ( th $0. $11. $1.9 $0. 1.0% 1 Core C&I $/th $0. $0.10 $0. $0.011 1.% 1 NGV $/th $0.0 $0.10 $0. $0.011.% 1 1 Noncore C&I - Distribution $/th $0.1 $0.10 $0. $0.011.0% 19 Noncore C&I - TLS $/th $0.0 $0.10 $0. $0.011.% 0 Electric Generation - Distribution $/th $0.0 $0.10 $0. $0.011.% 1 Electric Generation - TLS $/th $0.0 $0.10 $0. $0.011.% * Transportation rates effective September 1, 01, as approved in AL 9-G at SoCalGas and AL 19-G-A at SDG&E. ** Gas price is the prior twelve month average of the core procurement tariff (January 01 - December 01. *** This is the impact to the BTS Tariff. Individual customers may have impacts that differ due to how they purchase gas. Table reflects a direct impact to end-use customers based on the proposed increase in the BTS rate, and is for discussion purposes only. Since the BTS rate and the Gas Commodity price are market based rates, each customer s impact will be unique to their situation. - -

III. QUALIFICATIONS My name is Joseph Mock. My business address is West Fifth Street, Los Angeles, 9 10 California, 9001-1011. I am employed by the SoCalGas as a Principal Regulatory Economic Advisor in the Regulatory Affairs Department for SoCalGas and SDG&E. I hold a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering and a Master of Business Administration degree, both from Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles, California. I have been employed by SoCalGas since 00; first as an Account Executive in Commercial & Industrial Services, and also as an Engineer in Gas Transmission Planning. I have been in my current position since November, 010. This concludes my prepared direct testimony. - -