ConsensusDocs Guidebook

Similar documents
ConsensusDocs Guidebook

Educational Use Only S A M P L E S A M P L E

Educational Use Only S A M P L E S A M P L E

Educational Use Only S A M P L E S A M P L E

Better Contracts, Better Projects: The ConsensusDocs Solution

Document A Instructions

CIOB TIME AND COST MANAGEMENT CONTRACT CONSULTANCY APPOINTMENT CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR SCHEDULES EDITION

ConsensusDocs 751 STANDARD SHORT FORM AGREEMENT BETWEEN CONSTRUCTOR AND SUBCONTRACTOR

Document A107. Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Contractor for a Project of Limited Scope

Educational Use Only S A M P L E S A M P L E

Educational Use Only S A M P L E S A M P L E

Contingent Payment Frequently Asked Questions

Change Orders and Consensus Contracts

Document B Instructions Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Architect for a Project of Limited Scope

Accounting for Investments

Document Comparison Matrix

White Paper on Project Financing

AGC s Preliminary Commentary to the 2007 Edition of the AIA A201 General Terms and Conditions Document

Document A General Conditions of the Contract for Construction, Construction Manager as Adviser Edition

Page 1 CONTRACT DATA. used in conjunction with the. JBCC Minor Works Agreement. Edition published March 2014

WCIRB Data Reporting Handbook

SUBPART FIXED-PRICE CONTRACTS (Revised January 15, 1999) Fixed-price contracts with economic price adjustment.

Document Comparison Matrix

Valuations: Businesses, Securities, and Real Estate

mew Doc 1860 Filed 12/04/17 Entered 12/04/17 21:17:32 Main Document Pg 1 of 8

Subcontract conditions

Per the publisher's request, the full file is available after purchase. A Guide to IFRS

Managing design professional risks arising out of the Prime/Subcontractor relationship

Document B101. Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Architect

PART VII CONTRACT DELIVERABLES

Understanding the Risks of Construction Management (CM)

Recovery of Material Escalation Costs Arising From Steel and Aluminum Tariffs

Full Disclosures in Financial Reporting

BENEFITS OF COST ACCOUNTING CONSISTENCY FOR CONTRACTORS AND SUB CONTRATORS - THE APPLES TO APPLES COMPARISON

Document A SP General Conditions of the Contract for Construction, for use on a Sustainable Project, Construction Manager as Adviser Edition

General Conditions of the Construction Contract Between CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AND CONTRACTOR

CIOB TIME AND COST MANAGEMENT CONTRACT SUBCONTRACT APPENDICES 2015 EDITION

Key Contracting Issues

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 49

Advantages of the ConsensusDOCS Construction Contracts

Document B Instructions

Trade Association Form Subcontracts: The Good, The Not So Bad, And the Ugly

California Small Deductible Plan Effective January 1, 2019

The 2011 Comprehensive Update to ConsensusDOCS

PART VII CONTRACT DELIVERABLES

The Battle Royal: AGC Consensus Contracts vs. AIA Documents

CIOB TIME AND COST MANAGEMENT CONTRACT CONTRACT APPENDICES 2015 EDITION

AIA Document G

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT ANALYSIS. Robert Zellmer, CCA Manager Baker Tilly

Chapter 16 Completing the Tests in the Sales and Collection Cycle:

In September 2018, NCARB updated the ARE 5.0 Handbook to include 2017 AIA Contract Documents updates for the following documents:

Contracts Bulletin #98 Change Orders and Extra Work: Tools for Change

A Study of the Alignment of the NWEA RIT Scale with the Maryland Assessment System. Deborah Adkins

General Conditions for Construction GCC201. Contract Type: Document No. for the following PROJECT: (Name and location or address) EXAMPLE

a B Competitive Sealed Proposals b C.1 Procurement not exceeding one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000)

VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION FOR SECTION 109 MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT

Accounting for Related Party Financial Instruments and Significant Risk Disclosures

SECTION ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING CPM SCHEDULES

FEDERAL CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGER S BULLETIN Devoted exclusively to problems encountered while performing Government construction contracts

Catholic Mutual..."CARES"

Luxemburger Juristische Studien Luxembourg Legal Studies. Daniel Rosentreter

H&R Block Canada, Inc All Rights Reserved. Copyright is not claimed for any material secured from official government sources.

REQUEST FOR BID PROPOSALS

AIA Document B101 TM 2007

Mastering Subcontract Performance and Scope Requirements

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL ID# For Banking Services for Lackawanna County

CCF/CCF-II/MDH Transmission Guides Direct Registration System - Data Transmission Facility CCF File: DRSPRO User s Guide

AIA Document A201 TM 1997

ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD STANDARD OF GENERALLY RECOGNISED ACCOUNTING PRACTICE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS (GRAP 11)

CONSTRUCTION LAW AND RISK MANAGEMENT

SECTION PROJECT SCHEDULES (SMALL PROJECTS DESIGN/BID/BUILD)

CONSTRUCTION PROJECT ADMINISTRATION

AiM User Guide Capital Planning and Project Management (CPPM) System

AIA Document A201 TM 1997

[Completely Superseded] GASB Technical Bulletin No. 94-1

Momentum Passive Lifestage Portfolio Range

Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Contractor for a Residential or Small Commercial Project

COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL THE AIA STANDARD DOCUMENTS

AIA Document B141 TM 1997 Part

Compensation Stock Compensation (Topic 718)

Audio Sessions. Session 3 PRECONSTRUCTION. Construction Contract Administration Education Program

AIA Document A201 TM 2007

THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC. CMAA Document CMAR-2 (2013 Edition)

L O S S C O N T R O L

A Guide to Standard Form of Agreement Between Client and Licensed Interior Designer

Preventing and Managing the Risk of a Subcontractor Default A Best Practices Checklist

ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD INTERPRETATION OF THE STANDARDS OF GENERALLY RECOGNISED ACCOUNTING PRACTICE DISTRIBUTIONS OF NON-CASH ASSETS TO OWNERS

September 15, Garfield Traub Development Turner Construction Sundt Construction. ACT Executive Director. Tucson s New Hotel Project

New Standards for Accounting and Review Services (SSARS 21)

ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD INTERPRETATION OF STANDARDS OF GRAP ON

HOW DO COUNTRIES USE AN ASSET AND LIABILITY MANAGEMENT APPROACH? M. Coskun Cangoz Manager, Head of Debt Management Advisory

Revenue Recognition: Rules and Standards

Equip Your Company for the New 2017 AIA A201 & ConsensusDocs Contracts:

Water Utility Disinfection Survey

COMMENTARY ON THE EJCDC ENGINEERING SERVICES DOCUMENTS

DFARS Procedures, Guidance, and Information

Chapter 23 Audit of Cash and Financial Instruments. Copyright 2014 Pearson Education

A Study of the Alignment of the NWEA RIT Scale with the Montana Assessment System. Michael P. Dahlin, Ph.D.

Evolution of Relational Contracting in Construction

Document A201 TM 2007 SP

Transcription:

ConsensusDocs Guidebook ConsensusDocs 200.1 Time and Price Impacted Materials August 2013 Edition Page 1 of 5

Copyright 2013 by ConsensusDocs LLC All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Requests for permission to make copies of any part of this publication should be mailed to: Permissions ConsensusDocs 2300 Wilson Blvd., Suite 400 Arlington, VA 22201 Page 2 of 5

Introduction to the ConsensusDocs Guidebook ConsensusDocs is the product of leading construction associations, dedicated to identifying and utilizing best practices in the construction industry for standard construction contracts. The 36 participating associations represent Design Professionals, Owners, Constructors, Subcontractors, and Sureties that literally spell the DOCS in ConsensusDocs. ConsensusDocs contracts and forms attempt to fairly and appropriately allocate risks to the Party in the position to manage and control the risk. The practices articulated in the documents are forward-thinking, and may not always represent the status quo, but rather a better path forward to achieve project results. The goal of the multi-disciplined drafters was to create documents that best place the Parties to a construction contract in a position to complete a project on time and on budget with the highest possibility of avoiding claims. By starting with better standard documents that possess buy-in from all stakeholders in the design and construction industry, you reduce your transaction time and costs in reaching a final Agreement. By using fairer contracts helps eliminate unnecessary risk contingencies and thereby better pricing. In addition, fill-in-the-blanks are intended to lead to productive discussions about how particular risks should be allocated on specific projects before a contract is finalized. Also, the ConsensusDocs catalog includes complete families of documents for each project delivery method that provide a coordinated set of Agreements and complimentary administrative forms. There also are short form agreements that address the Owner-Constructor (205), the Owner-Design Professional (245), and the Constructor-Subcontractor contractual relationships in a more abbreviated manner than do the standard Agreements (ConsensusDocs 200, 240, and 750 respectively). In this Guidebook you will find comments by individual associations regarding particular contract documents. These comments are organized by numeric sequence of the ConsensusDocs contract documents. The overview sections highlight issues and innovative features of the documents generally. Association comments are expressions by an association to its association membership. These comments highlight provisions or alert their membership to consider possible project-specific modifications to a consensus standard Agreement or form. ConsensusDocs contracts covered in this release of this Guidebook include the 200, 200.1, 200.2, 205, 220, 221, 235, 240, 260, 246, 261, 262, 263, 298, 300, 301, 310, 410, 415, 450, 460, 470, 471, 472, 473, 500, 702, 703, 710, 750, 752, and 803. Please note that there has been a significant number of editing changes and section renumbering between the 2007 and 2011 versions that give the appearance that more substantive changes were made in the 2011 update than is actually the case. Consequently, a highlight sheet of changes was created to better pinpoint substantive changes. The 2011 update highlights sheet can be found here for free on the internet. Lastly, the ConsensusDocs coalition organizations and ConsensusDocs staff are deeply indebted to the hard work of the many the seasoned professionals who contributed countless hours in the creation of the ConsensusDocs contracts as well as this Guidebook. Their collective experience represents hundreds of years of practical experience in the construction field. Contributor names can be found at the conclusion of this Guidebook. Page 3 of 5

Comments regarding ConsensusDocs 200.1 Time and Price Impacted Materials Overview: The ConsensusDocs 200.1 Potentially Time and Price-Impacted Materials Amendment is a standardized, three-page Amendment that provides an Owner and Contractor a baseline price and calculation method for potential adjustments to material prices. When material price fluctuations are a concern, the Amendment provides a sensible framework for Owners and Contractors to protect themselves against construction material prices volatility. Only commodities specifically identified in Schedule A can potentially be adjusted up or down, and Parties may limit the amount of price adjustment. Moreover, appropriate documentation for adjustments is required and do not include overhead and profit. Amendment A also addresses time extensions in the event of a project delay caused by scarcity or delivery delay. Parties should take the following issues into consideration. The Amendment is intended to be completed and executed contemporaneously with the construction contract. Because the Amendment is intended to be flexible and to cover many different kinds of construction materials, calculation methods are merely suggested (established market or catalog prices; actual material costs; material cost indices; or other mutually agreed upon method) and no single method is deemed to be the default method. The Parties should agree upon a baseline price and adjustment method. This amendment is a tool to use in the negotiations, but it should be modified by the Parties to reflect the project circumstances. If the document is used in the Owner-Contractor Agreement, then the document should be used in the subcontract Agreements. This document can also be used in other Agreements such as the ConsensusDocs 410 Design-Build or the ConsensusDocs 500 Construction Management At-Risk Agreements. This publication is designed to provide information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is published with the understanding that the publisher, endorsers of ConsensusDocs and contributors to this Guidebook are not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or other professional services. If legal advice or other professional advice is required, the services of a competent professional person should be sought. From the Declaration of Principles jointly adopted by a Committee of the American Bar Association and a Committee of Publishers and Associations Page 4 of 5

AGC Comments for ConsensusDocs 200.1: (Additional Comments by AGC can be found on AGC s website at members only page of http://www.agc.org/galleries/members-only/agc-only_consensusdocs_guidebook.pdf for many of the ConsensusDocs documents.) General Contractors should advocate for the use of this amendment when material price fluctuations are a concern. This innovative contracting tool is designed to eliminate a contingency premium in a Contractors bid. Another contracting alternative to the 200.1 that assists in eliminating materials price contingency is for an Owner to pre-purchase materials. Decreases in Price (section 3.1): Contractors should be aware that this balanced document also carries the possibility that prices fall, and would thereby decrease payment. Price Increase Limit (section 3.3): If this fill-in-the blank section is mutually agreed upon by the Parties, then the amount of decrease or increase is capped. However, doing so eliminates some of the benefit of a Contractor eliminating contingency in submitted bid amounts. Page 5 of 5