Structural perspectives on European employment, productivity and growth in a global context Sintra, Portugal, 23 May 2015 Catherine L. Mann OECD Chief Economist
Key messages Prolonged weak demand has left many European economies with heavy public debt burdens, low investment and slow potential growth Improved structural policies, in the context of active demand management, would address these challenges Some structural policies could also help to contain inequality 2
High public debt ratios are one legacy of the crisis 100 95 From the onset of the crisis, debt ratios were pushed up by higher deficits, financial rescue packages and slow (or negative) nominal GDP growth Bringing them back to prudent levels is among the challenges facing European economies A. General government gross debt, Maastricht definition Per cent of GDP Public debt dynamics in the euro area 1 100 12 95 10 B. Components of annual change in debt-to-gdp ratio Percentage points Nominal GDP growth Nominal debt increase Change in debt/gdp ratio 12 10 90 90 8 8 85 85 6 6 80 80 4 4 75 75 2 2 70 70 0 0 65 65-2 -2 60 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 60-4 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014-4 1. Euro-area 15 countries. Source: Preliminary June 2015 OECD Economic Outlook database (STEP97). 3
Sluggish investment has been a factor preventing growth from reducing debt burdens Non-residential fixed investment Volumes, average annual percentage change from 2007 to 2014 Greece Portugal Italy Spain Ireland Japan France Netherlands United Kingdom Germany United States Sweden Canada Australia -10-8 -6-4 -2 0 2 4 Weak business investment post-crisis mostly explained by subdued demand Economic/policy uncertainty has fallen, but still a drag on investment Restrictive financing conditions pertained in some countries, especially early on in the crisis OECD work finds that restrictive product market regulation hinders investment Public investment, potential higher multipliers, has often been cut to meet fiscal consolidation objectives Note: Non-European countries in blue. Source: Preliminary June 2015 OECD Economic Outlook database (STEP97). 4
Low investment explains much of the post-crisis slowdown in potential growth Growth of OECD potential output per capita Contribution of components in percentage points 2,5 2,0 Active population rate ² TFP Potential per capita growth Potential employment rate¹ Capital per worker 1,5 1,0 0,5 0,0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014-0,5 1. Potential employment as a share of the working-age population (15-74). 2. Share of the population of working age in total population. Source: Preliminary June 2015 OECD Economic Outlook database (STEP97). 5
In the context of weak investment, the Juncker Plan could be a useful initiative Constructive collective action with regulatory harmonisation would generate positive externalities Recent OECD work suggests that cutting the heterogeneity of product market regulation by one fifth could increase intra-eu FDI by about 20% The Plan offers common vocabulary and spending Acts on supply and demand sides Outlays by national governments to the European Fund for Strategic Investment (EFSI) not counted under deficit rules 21 billion in guarantees from EC and EIB for 60 billion in EIB bond issuance to seed the EFSI; target of 315 billion of new investment over 3 years 6
TFP growth has also slowed, with diffusion one apparent problem Solid growth at the global productivity frontier but spillovers disappoint Labour productivity; index 2001=0 Source: Andrews, D. C. Criscuolo and P. Gal (2015), Frontier firms, technology diffusion and public policy: micro evidence from OECD countries forthcoming OECD Working Paper. 7
Structural factors shape diffusion Estimated frontier spillover (% p.a.) associated with a 2 percentage point increase in MFP growth at the global productivity frontier Globalisation Reallocation Knowledge-Based Capital Source: Saia, A., D. Andrews and S. Albrizio (2015), Public Policy and Spillovers From the Global Productivity Frontier: Industry Level Evidence, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, forthcoming. 8
Reducing skill mismatches is a promising avenue for boosting productivity Potential gains from reducing skill mismatch 40 35 30 Percentage of workers with skill mismatch (LHS) Gains to labour productivity from reducing skill mismatch (RHS) 12 10 25 8 20 6 15 10 4 5 2 0 POL CAN BEL SWE USA FRA NLD DNK JPN FIN EST KOR GBR NOR SVK AUS DEU AUT IRL CZE ESP ITA 0 Note: The figure shows the percentage of workers who are either over- or under- skilled and the simulated gains to allocative efficiency rom reducing skill mismatch in each country to the best practice level of mismatch. The figures are based on OECD calculations using OECD Survey of Adult Skills (2012). Source: M. Adalet McGowan and D. Andrews (2015), "Labour Market Mismatch and Labour Productivity: Evidence from PIAAC Data" OECD Economics Department Working Paper No. 1209. 9
Skill matching affected by structural policies and business environment Framework policies and the probability of skill mismatch Note: The dot is the average probability to have mismatch evaluated at the median level of the policy and individual characteristics. The distance between the Min/Max of the relevant policy indicator and the median is the change in the probability of skill mismatch with the respective policy change. Source: M. Adalet McGowan and D. Andrews (2015), "Labour Market Mismatch and Labour Productivity: Evidence from PIAAC Data" OECD Economics Department Working Paper No. 1209. 10
Structural policy choices also affect inequality Structural reforms and change in household disposable income Scaled relative to 1pp increase in GDP per capita in the long run 3 2 average 1 median 0-1 lower-middle class -2 poor -3 Source: OECD Economics Department Working Paper 1180. Can pro-growth policies lift all boats? An analysis based on household disposable incomeby Orsetta Causa, Alain de Serres and Nicolas Ruiz. 11
Summing up Mutually reinforcing macro and structural policies in Europe are needed to revive investment, employment and TFP growth Collective action by the EU/EA could generate positive externalities Choosing the right pro-growth structural policies can mitigate inequality as well 12