Top 10 Issues in APM Contract Negotiations

Similar documents
Provider and Provider Relationships. Primary Fraud and Abuse Issues

Avoiding Regulatory Land Mines in Commercial ACOs

Compliance Program. Health First Health Plans Medicare Parts C & D Training

Medicare Parts C & D Fraud, Waste, and Abuse Training

Medicare Parts C & D Fraud, Waste, and Abuse Training and General Compliance Training

Patient Access Programs: A Legal Perspective

Developed by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Issued: February, 2013

STRIDE sm (HMO) MEDICARE ADVANTAGE Fraud, Waste and Abuse

Current Status: Active PolicyStat ID: Fraud, Waste and Abuse

Investigator Compensation: Motivation vs. Regulatory Compliance

GAINSHARING & PAY FOR PERFORMANCE -- P4P UPDATE ON RECENT DEVELOPMENTS AND INITIATIVES

Medicare Parts C & D Fraud, Waste, and Abuse Training and General Compliance Training. Developed by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

Federal Fraud and Abuse Enforcement in the ASC Space

This Webcast Will Begin Shortly

This course is designed to provide Part B providers with an overview of the Medicare Fraud and Abuse program including:

Developed by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

7/25/2018. Government Enforcement in the Clinical Laboratory Space. The Statutes & Regulations. The Stark Law. The Stark Law.

FRAUD, WASTE, & ABUSE (FWA) for Brokers. revised 10/17

FAST BREAK : HOLIDAY GIFTS Jake Harper December 18, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP

Improving Integrity in Nursing Centers

Stark and the Anti Kickback Statute. Regulating Referral Relationship. February 27-28, HCCA Board Audit Committee Compliance Conference.

FRAUD AND ABUSE LAW IMPLICATED BY COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS. Lee Rosebush, PharmD, RPh, MBA, JD

Hospital Incentive Payments to Physicians for Quality and Cost Savings

Managing Financial Interests: The Anti Kickback Statute (AKS)

Compliance and Fraud, Waste, and Abuse Awareness Training. First Tier, Downstream, and Related Entities

Mission Statement. Compliance & Fraud, Waste and Abuse Training for Network Providers 1/31/2019

Stark, AKS, FCA Primer

Disclaimer. The materials and views expressed in this presentation are the views of the presenters and not necessarily the views of Northwell Health

WHAT EVERY NEW PRACTITIONER SHOULD CONSIDER

Anti-Kickback Statute and False Claims Act Enforcement

Supplemental Special Advisory Bulletin: Independent Charity. Patients who cannot afford their cost-sharing obligations

PI Compensation: Methods, Documentation, and Execution

PI Compensation: Methods, Documentation, and Execution

Completing the Journey through the World of Compliance. Session # COM6, March 5, 2018 Gabriel L. Imperato, Managing Partner Broad and Cassel

Anti-Kickback Statute Jess Smith

The Anti-Kickback Statute. May 3, 2013 Tennessee Hospice Organization Compliance Forum

National Policy Library Document

Hancock, Daniel & Johnson, P.C., P.O. Box 72050, Richmond, VA , ,

Goals of the Presentation. ACO Compliance Planning: Navigating 1/22/2016. Disclaimer

Gainsharing Is it Still Feasible? May 14, 2010

ACO Contracting Guide for SNFs

Check Your Physician Contracts

Certifying Employee Training Navicent Health s Corporate Integrity Agreement Year Two

2014 Lathrop & Gage LLP Lathrop & Gage LLP Lathrop & Gage LLP

DEFICIT REDUCTION ACT AND FALSE CLAIMS POLICY INFORMATION FOR All MASSACHUSETTS WORKFORCE MEMBERS

Contracting with Specialty Pharmacies and Hubs 17 th Annual Pharma and Medical Device Compliance Congress. October 20, 2016

Mar. 31, 2011 (202) Federal agencies address legal issues regarding Accountable Care Organizations

AHLA. F. Anti-Kickback Primer. David E. Matyas Epstein Becker & Green PC Washington, DC

Contracting With Research Sites And Investigators: A Fraud And Abuse Primer

Stark Self-Disclosure. Thomas S. Crane 1/ Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo, PC

The Impact of the Fraud and Abuse Laws on Pharmaceutical Advertising and Marketing Compliance: A Manufacturer s Perspective

Stark/Anti- Kickback Fundamentals

D E B R A S C H U C H E R T, C O M P L I A N C E O F F I C E R

Region 10 PIHP FY Corporate Compliance Program Plan

Fraud and Abuse Compliance for the Health IT Industry

Ohio Hospital Association 2014 Annual Meeting. Compensating Employed Physicians In An Evolving Health Care Environment

Conflicts of Interest 9/10/2017. Everything a Health Care Executive Needs to Know about the Anti-Kickback Statute. May 2, 2017 Article from JAMA:

CORPORATE INTEGRITY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AND TEXAS GENERAL SURGEONS

Medical Ethics. Paul W. Kim, JD, MPH O B E R K A L E R

Manufacturer Patient Support Initiatives: Current Practices and Recent Challenges. Andrew Ruskin Morgan Lewis

Legal Issues: Fraud and Abuse Navigating Stark and Kickback. Reece Hirsch, Esq. Jordana Schwartz, Esq. HIT Summit West March 7, 2005

Ridgecrest Regional Hospital Compliance Manual

Gifts to Referral Sources. Kim C. Stanger (11-17)

Contracting with an ACO Webinar. September 17, :00 pm 1:00 pm. Thank you for joining us. The webinar will begin shortly.

C. Enrollees: A Medicaid beneficiary who is currently enrolled in the MCCMH PIHP.

Charging, Coding and Billing Compliance

Medicare Parts C & D Fraud, Waste, and Abuse Training and General Compliance Training

DEFICIT REDUCTION ACT AND FALSE CLAIMS POLICY INFORMATION FOR All NEW YORK WORKFORCE MEMBERS

Industry Funding of Continuing Medical Education

S ark L aw aw An A t n i-kickbac b k S atut u e an an d Fal F se Cl C aims A c A t E f n orcement Jay y P. P A n A sti t n i e, e JD R adma m p

HCCA Compliance Institute Dallas, Texas Session 401- Monday, April 19, 2010

HELAINE GREGORY, ESQ.

The Impact of Emerging Reimbursement Models on Physician Compensation

Montefiore Medical Center Compliance Program. Welcome House Staff Orientation

Repay Overpayments (18 USC 1347; 42 CFR et seq.)

It s Here: The Final 60 Day Overpayment Rule

FEDERAL HEALTH CARE PROGRAM ANTI-KICKBACK STATUTE Social Security Act 1128B(b), 42 U.S.C. 1320a-7b(b)

Commitment to Compliance

CBI PAP LEGAL UPDATE MEDICARE & MEDICAID A REVIEW OF COMPLIANCE WITH GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS. September 26, Sarah difrancesca Partner Cooley LLP

Physician Care: Physician Compensation. Presented by Albert R. Riviezzo, Esq. Fox Rothschild LLP Exton, PA

HEALTH CARE FRAUD. EXPERT ANALYSIS HHS OIG Adopts New Anti-Kickback Safe Harbor and Civil Monetary Penalty Exceptions

Ensuring Compliance with the Law - Properly Structuring Innovative Marketing and Creative Joint Ventures. Top 5 Things to Know for CE:

Ensuring Compliance with the Law - Properly Structuring Innovative Marketing and Creative Joint Ventures. Clay Stribling, Esq.

Physician Contracts GOVERNANCE THOUGHT LEADERSHIP SERIES

PREVENTION, DETECTION, AND CORRECTION OF FRAUD, WASTE AND ABUSE

Coding Partners in Patient Safety

Medicare Parts C & D General Compliance Training

REGULATORY ISSUES IMPACTING SUPPLY CHAIN

Recent and Emerging Issues Related to Clinical Laboratory Testing and How to Avoid Them. Compliance

COMPLIANCE; It s Not an Option

Approval Signatures: *This policy is based on VO legacy policy LC310 issued 12/4/06 and last approved 3/14/14

AGENCY: Office of Inspector General (OIG) HHS. to the anti-kickback statute and the civil monetary penalty

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES. Office of Inspector General s Use of Agreements to Protect the Integrity of Federal Health Care Programs

Fraud, Waste and Abuse: Compliance Program. Section 4: National Provider Network Handbook

MENTAL HEALTH MENTAL RETARDATION OF TARRANT COUNTY. Board Policy. Number A.3 July 31, 2001 COMPLIANCE PLAN

Practical Considerations for Medical Practices Considering Converting Their Vascular Access Centers Into Medicare-Certified Ambulatory Surgery Centers

Amgen GLOBAL CORPORATE COMPLIANCE POLICY

Federal Administrative Sanctions

Stark Law Exceptions and Anti-Kickback Safe Harbors

Triad Healthcare Network Accountable Care Organization Participants

Transcription:

Legal Issues in New Contracting and Risk Sharing Models - What To Know Before You Sign Alexis Finkelberg Bortniker Foley & Lardner LLP 617-226-3177 Abortniker@foley.com June 2, 2017 Top 10 Issues in APM Contract Negotiations 1) Negotiations over high cost outliers Responsibility for high cost drug therapies 2) Reinsurance Physician Incentive Plan Rules 3) Risk pool calculations and participants Off-cycle enrollment Off-cycle physician enrollment/disenrollment 4) Antitrust issues Data Access and Anti-Trust 1

Top 10 Issues in APM Contract Negotiations cont 5) Preauthorization requirements 6) Medical necessity and retrospective review Underutilization monitoring 7) Data access What you will get Who will have access Who owns the information What will you be required to share Top 10 Issues in APM Contract Negotiations cont 8) Downstream compliance liability 9) In-network negotiation, buy-in and compliance 10) Understanding payment parameters and potential for upside Upside and downside potential parameters 2

But first Back to Basics Renewed importance in definition of terms Assignment of Members Quality metrics Included and excluded expenses Included and excluded services Example: definition of Readmission You cant forget fraud and abuse compliance ACO waivers and state/federal push to use APMs creates a false sense of freedom Must assess Federal Kickback, Stark and CMP Issues when dealing with MA and potentially Medicaid or other federal healthcare programs. MA AKS rules when dealing with commercial health plans MA Medicaid regulations when dealing with Medicaid agreements. 3

Other Massachusetts Compliance Issues HPC Material Change Filings Corporate Affiliations, Contracting Affiliations, Clinical Affiliations, Discount Arrangements Registration of Provider Organizations Risk Bearing Provider Organization Risk Bearing Certificate Requirements http://www.mass.gov/ocabr/government/oca-agencies/doi-lp/risk-certificate-applicationinformation.html A Provider Organization shall not be permitted to enter into an arrangement with either a Carrier or a Public Health Care Payer whereby the Provider Organization or any entity with which the Provider Organization has a Contracting Affiliation manages the treatment of a group of patients and bears Downside Risk according to the terms of an Alternative Payment Contract, or other alternative payment arrangement as part of an insured health benefit plan network, unless the Provider Organization obtains a Risk Certificate or a Risk Certificate Waiver, as applicable Definition of Alternative Payment Methodologies or Methods: Methods of payment that are not solely based on fee for service reimbursements; provided, however, Alternative Payment Methodologies may include, but shall not be limited to, shared savings arrangements, bundled payments, and global payments; and further provided, Alternative Payment Methodologies may include fee for service payments, which are settled or reconciled with a bundled or global payment. 4

ACO Compliance Requirements Compliance program requirements applicable to MSSP ACOs. The MSSP regulations at 42 C.F.R. 425.300 (the Regulations ) explicitly require that a MSSP ACO s compliance program have the following elements: A designated compliance officer who is not legal counsel (but who may be a lawyer) and who reports directly to the ACO s governing body; Mechanisms for identifying and addressing compliance problems related to the ACO s operations and performance; A method for employees or contractors of the ACO, ACO participants, ACO providers/suppliers and other individuals or entities performing functions or services related to the ACO to anonymously report suspected problems related to the ACO to the compliance officer; Compliance training for the ACO, the ACO participants, and the ACO providers/suppliers; and A requirement for the ACO to report probable violations of law to an appropriate law enforcement agency. The ACO must also update its compliance program periodically to reflect changes in law and regulation. The RFR model agreement for the Model A ACO includes robust contractual requirements for a compliance program that incorporates the federal Managed Care Organization program integrity requirements at 42 C.F.R. 438.608. To adhere to the contractual requirements, a MassHealth ACO s compliance program must include: Written policies, procedures, and standards of conduct that articulate the ACO s commitment to comply with all applicable federal and state standards; A designated compliance officer and compliance committee that is directly accountable to senior management as described in 42 C.F.R. 438.608, and a designated fraud and abuse prevention coordinator (who may also be the compliance officer) that manages the fraud and abuse program and is the referral and education point for employees in conjunction with the compliance officer; Training and education for the compliance officer and the ACO s employees, as well as providing employees, subcontractors, and agents with information about fraud and abuse laws, false claims, and whistleblower protections including in compliance with 42 U.S.C. 1396a(a)(68) where applicable; Effective lines of communication between the compliance officer, fraud and abuse prevention coordinator, and the ACO employees; Provisions for prompt responses to detected offenses and corrective action initiatives; Enforcement standards and disciplinary guidelines for compliance violations that are well-publicized; Provisions for internal monitoring and auditing including provider audits through sampling methods to determine whether represented services were actually delivered by provider and received by enrollees, utilization review, and a mechanism to suspend payments to providers where MassHealth has credible allegation of fraud pursuant to 42 C.F.R. 455.23; Communication of suspected violations of state and federal law to government agencies, including overpayments, circumstances affecting an enrollee s MassHealth eligibility, and circumstances affecting a participating provider s eligibility to participate in MassHealth; A fraud and abuse program to prevent and detect program violations, investigate allegations of misconduct, protect reporting employees from retaliation, recover improper or fraudulent payments, implement corrective actions, and comply with MassHealth s reporting and certification requirements; and Initial and ongoing screening procedures for the ACO and providers to determine if any individuals or entities are excluded from participation in federal health care programs, and notification of any discovered exclusions to MassHealth 5

Fraud and Abuse Reference Materials ACO Waiver Examples Next Generation ACO https://www.cms.gov/medicare/fraud-and- Abuse/PhysicianSelfReferral/Downloads/Next-Generation-ACO-Model-Waiver.pdf ACO Participation Waiver Shared Savings Distribution Waiver Stark Law Waiver Waiver for Patient Engagement Activities MSSP Waivers https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/fr-2015-10-29/pdf/2015-27599.pdf ACO Pre-participation Waiver ACO Participation Waiver Shared Savings Distribution Waiver Stark Law Waiver Waiver for Patient Engagement Activities 6

Fraud and Abuse Compliance: A key question for analysis What kind of Plan is at the top of the food chain? This will determine the applicability of AKS safe harbors, the Stark exception, and applicable MA law There are many plans, and in applying the various potential safe harbors, or exceptions, the greatest opportunity for flexibility occurs when the plan is a risk based plan such as a Medicare Advantage (MA) plan, a competitive medical plan (CMP), a prepaid health plan or another type of plan that operates under a risk based contract with CMS or a State health care program The Analysis Begins: The Anti-Kickback Statute SSA Section 1128B Criminal penalties (42 USC 1320a-7b) -- Knowingly and willfully solicits are receives any kickback or rebate directly or indirectly -- in return for referring for the furnishing or arranging for the furnishing any item or service for which payment may be made... -- in return for purchasing, leasing, ordering or arranging for or recommending any good, facility service or item -- for which payment may be made in whole or in part under a Federal health care program 7

The AKS Managed Care Safe Harbors 42 CFR 1001.952 [ 952 ][All regulatory references are to 42 CFR 1001.952 unless otherwise noted] A statement of what is NOT remuneration for purposes of Section 1128B (42 USC 1320 a-7(b)) Discounts -- 952(h) and 42 USC 1320a-7(b)(b)(3)(A) Increased coverage, reduced cost sharing amounts or reduced premium amounts offered by health plans 952(l) Price reductions offered to health plans 952(m) AKS Managed Care Safe Harbors, cont. Price reductions offered to eligible managed care organizations ( EMCOs ) 952(t) Price reductions offered by contractors with substantial financial risk ( SFR ) to managed care organizations 952(u) 8

The most flexible safe harbor The EMCO safe harbor 952(t) The Eligible Managed Care Organization (EMCO) is the most flexible (42 CFR 1001.952(t)) Remuneration does NOT include any payments between an EMCO and a first tier contractor for items or services if three standards are met (1) A signed written agreement, for at least a year, specifies the covered items and services, and no other claims to a federal health care program from the first tier contractor Conditions for EMCO first tier payments (2) No swapping (3) No shifting of costs to claim increased payments from a Federal health care program Items or services are: Health care items, devices, supplies or services OR those services reasonably related to the provision of such, including non-emergency transportation, patient education, social services (e.g. case management), UR, QA, but not marketing or pre-enrollment activities Thus, if part of the payment package includes any item or service listed, it will not be construed as a payment to induce referrals from the plan (e.g. we will provide non-emergency transportation to plan enrollees, free obesity education, take home supplies), it will not run afoul of the AKS If the arrangement includes a marketing component, it would not be within the safe harbor 9

EMCOs EMCOs are Any Medicare Part C health plan that receives a capitated payment and which has its cost sharing approved by CMS Medicaid managed care organizations PACE plans or Federally qualified HMOs This means Any payment arrangement between a provider and an MA plan directly, provided it is in writing, for a least a year, etc. is not a violation of the AKS. This includes discounts, payments based on network configuration, payments based on volume, payments that vary over time, payments that are based on quality, all of which are a part of the payments made for the provision of items or services will not constitute prohibited remuneration under the AKS 10

And furthermore. The payments from the EMCO do not have to be to a provider--- Any first tier contractor for providing or arranging for items or services The payments can be to a TPA, a management company or any other entity that is in the business of arranging for the provision of items or services provided they are licensed to accept the payments Suggestion: To take best advantage of the EMCO exception at a first tier level, have the plan rep and warrant that it is a qualifying EMCO and the payments it makes fall within the EMCO safe harbor; at a downstream level, similar reps and warranties from the first tier contractor If other than MA plan business is involved (e.g. Medicaid) review the law of the applicable state as well, as the exception will not supersede State law for non-federal plan activities At the second tier and downstream levels. Remuneration does not include ANY PAYMENT between a first tier contractor and a downstream contactor (e.g. from an IPA to a hospital or the reverse) or between two downstream contractors to provide OR arrange for items or services so long as: A signed written agreement, for at least a year, specifying the covered items and services, and no claim on another program No swapping No shift of financial burden 11

Downstream continued Condition 4: The EMCO First Tier Agreement does not involve A cost based FQHC, HMO or CMP on a cost basis, or non-risk based Federally qualified HMO Downstream includes those with direct or indirectly with a first tier contractor (an individual or entity). This will include anyone in the arrangement, including suppliers, ancillary providers, independent contractors with contracts with an entity that itself has a contract with the first tier contractor to provider or arrange for provision of items or services Downstream flexibility as well ANY PAYMENT is again covered As long as it is for items or services that are covered in the first tier arrangement Suggestion: Downstream contractors should verify that the services are covered by the First Tier contract. A first tier contract that carves out specialty services, high cost drugs, vision services will not protect hospital physician arrangements downstream that involve the provision of those services (e.g. collateral arrangements) 12

Price reductions offered to health plans -- 952(m) Remuneration does not include a reduction in price a contract health care provider offers to a health plan in accordance with a written agreement for the sole purpose of furnishing to enrollees items or services which are covered by the Plan Term not less than a year, items and services specified in advance, Methodology specified in advance The Discount Safe Harbor Discounts -- 952(h) Remuneration does not include a discount that meets the reporting obligations of the safe harbor A MA plan need not report the discount unless specifically required by its contract Must be applicable to Medicare, Medicaid or other Federal health care programs Cannot be in cash Cannot be part of a swapping arrangement Cannot consist of a waiver of a co-pay, coinsurance or deductible 13

Price reductions by contractors with SFR to MCOs 952(u) More challenging than the EMCO safe harbor and, in some cases redundant First tier application to A qualified managed care plan if 5 standards are met An agreement which is for at least a year, signed by the parties, requiring QA program and specifies a methodology that is commercially reasonable and consistent with [fmv] SFR Contractor safe harbor cont. --If 1 st tier contractor has an investment interest, cannot be a kickback (circular criteria?) --First tier contractor must have substantial financial risk (capitation, % of premium, DRG payments, bonus/withhold program [20/10 requirement on target payments], reasonable payments amounts resulting, etc., etc. --Reimbursable items or services must be submitted directly to the Federal program in accordance with a valid assignment and payments must be identical to payment arrangements [related to] other beneficiaries for same items or services AND --No swapping or shifting the financial burden 14

A qualified managed care plan is Operates in accordance with a contract, agreement or statutory demo authority approved by CMS or a State health care program Charges a premium and its premium structure is regulated by the State Is an employer, or welfare fund; OR Is licensed in the State, contracts with an employer, union welfare fund or company furnishing coverage and is paid a fee for administration of the plan which is at FMV AND Runs UR/QA programs and treatment for Federal beneficiaries..is not different AND Has population that matches up to Medicare beneficiary limits (10%/50%) MA Kickback Statute Any person who solicits or receives any remuneration, directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly, in cash or in kind in return for purchasing, leasing, ordering or arranging for or recommending purchasing, leasing, or ordering of any good, facility, service, or item for which payment is or may be made in whole or in part by a health care insurer, or any person who offers or pays any remuneration, including any bribe or rebate, except as provided in subsection (b), directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly, in cash or in kind to induce any person to purchase, lease, order or arrange for or recommend purchasing, leasing or ordering of any good, facility, service, or item for which payment is or may be made in whole or in part by a health care insurer, shall be punished by a fine of not more than ten thousand dollars, or by imprisonment in a jail or house of correction for not more than two and one half years or in the state prison for not more than five years, or by both such fine and imprisonment, and may be held liable in a civil action under section seven. Mass. Gen. Laws Ann. ch. 175H, 3(a). 15

MA Medicaid Statute Whoever solicits or receives any remuneration, including any bribe or rebate, directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly, in cash or in kind in return for purchasing, leasing, ordering or arranging for or recommending purchasing, leasing, or ordering any good, facility, service, or item for which payment may be made in whole or in part under this chapter, or whoever offers or pays any remuneration, including any bribe or rebate, directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly, in cash or in kind to induce such person to purchase, lease, order, or arrange for or recommend purchasing, leasing, ordering any good, facility, service, or item for which payment may be made in whole or in part under this chapter shall be punished by a fine of not more than ten thousand dollars, or by imprisonment in the state prison for not more than five years or in a jail or house of correction for not more than two and one half years, or by both such fine and imprisonment. This section shall not apply to a discount or other reduction in price obtained by a provider of services or other entity under this chapter if the reduction in price is properly disclosed and appropriately reflected in the costs claimed or charges made by the provider or entity under this chapter or to any amount paid by an employer to an employee, who has a bona fide employment relationship with such employer, for employment in the provision of covered items or services. Mass. Gen. Laws Ann. ch. 118E, 41. 16