U.S. AFAR Action Plan Implementation Road Map

Similar documents
Italy Asset Recovery Action Plan Implementation Road Map 2013

DRAFT Agenda. Arab Forum on Asset Recovery September 2012 St. Regis Hotel, Doha, State of Qatar

Conference of the States Parties to the United Nations Convention against Corruption

How are legal arrangements (express trusts and trust-like agreements) formed in the United States?

Accelerated International Momentum to Return Stolen Assets

Conference of the States Parties to the United Nations Convention against Corruption

2013 Lough Erne G8 Summit Interim Compliance Report

GLOBAL FORUM ON ASSET RECOVERY COMMUNIQUE. Washington D.C. December 4-6, 2017

Conference of the States Parties to the United Nations Convention against Corruption

Identifying Victims of Corruption

Report on cooperation challenges faced by the Court with respect to financial investigations. Workshop October 2015, The Hague, Netherlands

Eurojust s Casework in Asset Recovery at a Glance

Global Forum on Asset Recovery Washington, DC, December 4-6, In-session summary

Thematic Paper on Organised Crime Asset Confiscation as an Instrument to Deprive Criminal Organisations of the Proceeds of their Activities.

José Lopes da Mota Deputy Prosecutor General Former President of Eurojust

2012 G8 Camp David Final Compliance Report

Strasbourg, 6 November 2015 C198-COP(2015)PROG3-ANALYSIS

Second Evaluation Round

Mauritius Communiqué on the Global Conference on Anti- Corruption Reform in Small Island States

Council of Europe COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS

Conference of the States Parties to the United Nations Convention against Corruption

-Executive Summary- Assessment of the review process. Conduct of process

NEW LEGISLATION FRAMEWORKS IN ASSET RECOVERY

THE KINGDOM OF LESOTHO ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING AND COMBATING THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM REGIME

Conference of the States Parties to the United Nations Convention against Corruption

CAC/COSP/IRG/2011/CRP.12

Strasbourg, 11 February 2000 PC -R-EV (99) 27 Summ. EUROPEAN COMMITTEE ON CRIME PROBLEMS (CDPC)

REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA NATIONAL STRATEGY ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING COMBATTING THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM

Conference of the States Parties to the United Nations Convention against Corruption

Conference of the States Parties to the United Nations Convention against Corruption

Role of Parliamentarians in Asset Recovery

Official web site of the Ministry:

International Monetary Fund Washington, D.C.

OBJECTIVES FOR FATF XXVII ( )

Technical Meeting on Co-operation in Bribery Investigations and Prosecutions

Practical Implementation of UN Standards and Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering (FATF) Recommendations: Challenges and Assistance

Legal Framework on Asset Recovery The United Nations Convention Against Corruption 1. Oliver Stolpe UNODC

Addressing Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing, Preventive Measures and the Proceeds of Crime. Common Law Legal Systems Model Provisions

Objectives for FATF XXV ( ) Paper by the incoming President

BARRIERS TO ASSET RECOVERY STUDY CONCEPT NOTE

CSO GFAR report on Sri Lanka

Fifth Report of the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Counter-Terrorism Committee established by Security Council resolution 1373 (2001) 9 May 2006

Organization of American States OAS Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission CICAD. Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism MEM.

INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION IN THE FIELD OF CONFISCATION AND RECOVERY OF CRIMINAL ASSETS: TOOLS AND INSTRUMENTS

QUESTIONNAIRE Country self-assessment report on implementation and enforcement of G20 commitments on foreign bribery

CONFISCATION OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION CRIMINAL LAW

PROJECT AGAINST CORRUPTION IN ALBANIA (PACA) TECHNICAL PAPER

PROGRESS REPORT ON THE G20 SELF-ASSESSMENT ON COMBATING THE BRIBERY OF FOREIGN PUBLIC OFFICIALS

JIT GUIDELINES ON THE USE OF JOINT INVESTIGATION TEAMS THB WB. Co-funded by the Prevention of and Fight against Crime Programme of the European Union

The Role of Donors in the Recovery of Stolen Assets

Washington, DC December 4-6, 2017

FATF Mutual Evaluation of Ireland 2017

Conference of the States Parties to the United Nations Convention against Corruption

Ref: PSA/WP/DO(2012)32 06 February Dear Alex,

Toshifumi Ishida. International Safety and Security Cooperation Division Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan

Standard Summary Project Fiche. Project number: TR Twinning number: TR02-JH-05

Conference of the States Parties to the United Nations Convention against Corruption

CONTEMPORARY MEASURES FOR EFFECTIVE INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION

COMPACT TO PROMOTE TRANSPARENCY AND COMBAT CORRUPTION: A NEW PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN THE G8 AND NIGERIA

Annual Report January December 2017

PROGRAMME OF THE 1 st EuroMed Forum of the Prosecutors General

STRENGTHENING CAPITAL MARKET REGULATION AND SUPERVISION IN THE MENA REGION

Govern d Andorra Missió Permanent del Principat d Andorra a l OSCE NOTE VERBALE

The Financial Intelligence Service

The following three mandates call for actual work to strengthening the recovery and return of stolen assets:

S/2004/450. Security Council. United Nations

INTER-GOVERNMENTAL ACTION GROUP AGAINST MONEY LAUNDERING IN WEST AFRICA. Fifth Follow Up Report. Mutual Evaluation

Recommendation of the Council for Further Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions

Seminar on Performance Budgeting and Fiscal Transparency

Conference of the States Parties to the United Nations Convention against Corruption

2014 Anti-Corruption Related Events

Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

ClientBrief. International Litigation & Arbitration Practice

Accountability Report: Implementation Review of G8. on Anti-Corruption Commitments

I. INSTITUTIONAL BUILDING / NATIONAL ANTI-DRUG STRATEGY

EUROPEAN COMMITTEE ON CRIME PROBLEMS (CDPC)

INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION IN THE FIELD OF CONFISCATION AND RECOVERY OF CRIMINAL ASSETS: TOOLS AND INSTRUMENTS

COOPERACIÓN POLICIAL INTERNACIONAL EN LA INVESTIGACIÓN DE BLANQUEO CAPITALES

Minutes of Meeting. ADB/OECD Anti-Corruption Initiative for Asia and the Pacific. Participants. Chairs of the Meeting. Summary of the Discussions

No deal Brexit: Criminal justice co-operation

CROSS BORDER STATUTES & OTHER MEASURES TO CURB MONEY LAUNDERING 25 November 2005, Makati Shangrila, Rizal Ballroom Makati, Philippines

CORRUPTION. A Reference Guide and Information Note. on the use of the FATF Recommendations. to support the fight against Corruption

Executive Summary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Key Findings. Preface

ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING/ COUNTERING THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM STRATEGY GROUP

The Fight against Money Laundering

ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING AND COUNTERING THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM (AML/CFT) NEWSLETTER FOR CENTRAL ASIA

OECD draft Guidance to Counter Illicit Trade: enhancing transparency in Free Trade Zones

Consultation Paper. The Review of the Standards Preparation for the 4 th Round of Mutual Evaluation. Second public consultation

Open-Ended Intergovernmental Working Group on Asset Recovery. Asset Tracing & Recovery A Case Study. 17 December 2010 Vienna

Report of the Third Session of the Arab Forum on Asset Recovery

2 nd Enhanced Follow-Up Report for Tunisia Re- Ratings Request

Mutual recognition of judicial decisions on confiscation: the way forward

Strasbourg, 11 February 2000 PC -R-EV (99) 28 Summ. EUROPEAN COMMITTEE ON CRIME PROBLEMS (CDPC)

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES INTERIM REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

BRIEFING NOTE ON THE BAILIWICK OF GUERNSEY S NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT 7 July 2016

High-risk and non-cooperative jurisdictions

International Standards on Combating Money Laundering and the Financing of. The FATF Recommendations

Europol and the Criminal Law: Approximation of Substantive Crimes and Procedural Rules as Prerequisite for Cross-Border Task Forces?

From: Annual Report on the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises 2013 Responsible Business Conduct in Action

CRS-2 develop and promote policies to combat money laundering and terrorist financing. 3 Recently, China and South Korea were granted observer status,

Transcription:

Action Plan commitment Progress so far Timetable for next steps Seek to enhance responsiveness: Take into account the importance of transition countries requests for case assistance in recovering proceeds of corruption and organized crime and accordingly give them priority, where legally permissible, and encourage regional partner countries to do the same. Implementation: Immediate In addition to the Kleptocracy Asset Recovery Initiative launched by the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) in 2011, the United States has a DOJ Attaché based in Cairo, as well as a team of attorneys in the DOJ who are devoted to (1) promoting case cooperation between Deauville Partnership countries and the DOJ and to (2) providing technical training on asset recovery to Deauville Partnership countries. The United States also plans to place an attorney in Doha who will be dedicated to promoting such case cooperation and providing such training. In addition, the DOJ has attorneys dedicated to facilitating mutual legal assistance between the United States and Deauville Partnership countries and has implemented a policy of prioritizing mutual legal assistance requests from transition countries. Ongoing: The MENA-region-based attorney will be in Doha, Qatar, in November 2013. Adopt and enforce international frameworks: Ratify the U.N. Convention Against Corruption as soon as possible, and take steps to enhance their enforcement of laws against foreign bribery, in order to provide a universal legal framework for asset recovery cooperation. Promote transparency and effective cooperation. Each G8 member will: Publish a guide that describes specific steps required for assistance and cooperation in matters related to tracing, freezing, confiscation, and return of proceeds of corruption, whether through formal mutual legal assistance (MLA) or other forms of cooperation and make the guide available in Arabic Designate or appoint the office/persons responsible for inquiries, guidance, or other investigative cooperation The United States ratified the UNCAC in 2006 and is fully compliant with its obligations. The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) of 1977 is the most vigorously enforced anti-bribery legislation in the world. The United States has a specialized unit, the Fraud Section of the Department of Justice, which is dedicated to tackling foreign bribery. The United States guide is available in the 6 UN languages (Arabic, English, French, Spanish, Russian, and Mandarin Chinese) and is published on the StAR website: http://star.worldbank.org/star/arabforum/country-guidesasset-recovery-0 The English version is also available at: http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/190690.pdf The U.S. Department of Justice s Office of International Affairs is responsible for inquiries and guidance related to

permitted by law, both for MLA and for other forms of cooperation not requiring MLA requests MLA. Police-to-police and intelligence enquiries can be initiated through U.S. representatives on CARIN, the Global Focal Point network, and Egmont, or via the contacts provided in the U.S. asset recovery guide, including: kleptocracy@usdoj.gov. Designate the appropriate points of contact to relevant networks, including but not limited to the global asset recovery Focal Point network, UNCAC COSP, and CARIN, that may be useful for coordination Facilitate cooperation leading to effective recovery. The U.S. asset recovery guide is available at http://star.worldbank.org/star/arabforum/country-guidesasset-recovery-0 and at http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/190690.pdf The United States has designated points of contact for each of the relevant networks: Focal Point network: Represented by the Department of Justice s Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Section. UNCAC CoSP: Represented by the Department of State s Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs. CARIN: Represented by the Department of Justice s Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Section and the United States Marshals Service; can be reached at CARIN@usdoj.gov. Each G8 member will act urgently on the following key measures: Ensure that there are mechanisms in place for enforcement The United States can enforce foreign confiscation orders of foreign orders of confiscation unless inconsistent with issued in criminal and non-conviction-based confiscation fundamental principles of domestic law. This would include, proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2467. wherever possible, considering measures as may be necessary to enforce non-conviction based confiscation orders (such as confiscation orders which do not require a criminal trial and conviction), at a minimum in the circumstances envisaged by UNCAC and FATF

Recommendations. Such enforcement should be permitted even in the absence of a domestic system for non-conviction based confiscation or other equivalent avenue Consider, to the extent consistent with fundamental principles of domestic law and judicial proceedings, establishing systems that allow for recovery through nonconviction-based confiscation or equivalent (at minimum in cases of death, flight, or absence) and adopting legislation that establishes a non-criminal standard for burden of proof or reverses the onus of proof through rebuttable presumptions Ensure that domestic legal frameworks (i.e., legislation and/or regulations) allow for swift identification and tracing of assets, including in response to international requests. The United States has a series of statutes, including but not limited to 18 U.S.C. 981 and 21 U.S.C. 881, that permit for non-conviction-based asset recovery (known as civil forfeiture). The United States civil forfeiture statutory framework is much more robust than the minimum standards established by the UNCAC and the FATF recommendations. The burden of proof in U.S. civil forfeiture proceedings is the civil standard, that is, by the preponderance of the evidence, which is a lower burden of proof than is required for criminal conviction. The United States Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), FinCEN, is responsible for providing financial intelligence in response to international requests for assistance in tracing assets. FinCEN is a member the Egmont Group which provides for a channel of sharing FIU information following strict Egmont Group protocols. CARIN is an informal forfeiture group, composed of forfeiture legal practitioners and investigators from fifty-six jurisdictions, that promotes the establishment of an informal asset forfeiture international assistance points-of-contact network. U.S. CARIN contacts process 50 to 75 incoming asset tracing exercises a year for their foreign counterparts to the extent this can be done without the need of a formal assistance request. Formal requests for assistance to swiftly identify and trace assets subject to confiscation are assigned by the U.S. Department of Justice to a specialised international confiscation unit within the Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Section of the Department of Justice for execution using the same variety of intrusive investigative powers that are available to U.S. law enforcement and prosecutors in domestic investigations.

Ensure that domestic legislation and/or regulations allow sufficient time frames for freezing assets during the pendency of foreign investigations and proceedings Ensure that mutual legal assistance regarding asset recovery can be granted in the absence of a bilateral legal assistance agreement, under appropriate circumstances. If necessary, and without prejudice to the preceding point, recognize UNCAC as a sufficient legal basis for mutual legal assistance (MLA) by States Parties Ensure that MLA requests for freezing can be permitted on an ex parte basis (i.e., no requirement to give the asset holder the opportunity to contest beforehand the provision of MLA) Allow domestic officials, in accordance with its domestic laws, to alert a foreign jurisdiction to an ongoing investigation in the disclosing jurisdiction and indicate that existing information could be of interest, a proactive form of assistance, and to do so on a peer-to-peer basis where permissible In case of a barrier to execution of a mutual legal assistance request, promptly communicate the nature of the difficulty to the requesting authorities so that it may be corrected expeditiously Enhance case cooperation: During the post-transition period, work with local officials in requesting transition countries on the underlying Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2467, the United States can seek to enforce foreign restraining orders and restrain (freeze) assets located in the United States that are subject to foreign criminal or non-conviction-based confiscation proceedings. Assets remain frozen until a court dismisses the restraining order. The United States may provide mutual legal assistance regarding asset recovery pursuant to bilateral and multilateral agreements, including pursuant to the UNCAC. The United States can also provide certain forms of mutual legal assistance regarding asset recovery absent any bilateral or multi-lateral agreement. Upon application to a court, the United States can seek ex parte to enforce foreign restraining orders and to restrain (freeze) property subject to pending foreign criminal and non-conviction-based confiscation proceedings. Many U.S. law enforcement agencies have attachés in U.S. embassies around the world who act as conduits of information and may alert foreign law enforcement of ongoing investigations either spontaneously or as provided for in numerous law enforcement to law enforcement agreements. U.S. CARIN network contacts are permitted to contact foreign peers about the need for confiscation assistance in ongoing investigations. The U.S. Department of Justice has attorneys, including a DOJ Attaché in Cairo, dedicated to facilitating mutual legal assistance between the United States and Deauville Partnership countries. Those attorneys are able to work directly with Deauville Partnership countries to facilitate mutual legal assistance and overcome deficiencies in mutual legal assistance requests. The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has three prosecutors in the MENA region (UAE, Egypt, and Algeria). A fourth one Fully Implemented Fully Implemented Ongoing

investigations to develop leads for records and assets located abroad as well as to facilitate international legal assistance. This would include, upon request, sending practitioners (whether from the G8 country governments themselves, relevant international organizations and initiatives or other appropriate sources) to the requesting country especially dedicated to the work of the Arab Forum on Asset Recovery will be posted to Doha in November 2013. These attorneys complement the work of the Kleptocracy Unit of DOJ s Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Section (AFMLS). The Kleptocracy Unit was formally instituted in 2011 to specifically identify and recover assets of corrupt officials, their families, and cronies. These attorneys have either met or worked with Deauville Partnership country officials either in their countries or in Washington D.C. The Unit has also extended an invitation for Deauville Partnership practitioners to come to the Kleptocracy Unit and work side by side with the Units lawyers and financial investigation team. U.S. government practitioners have also repeatedly visited Egypt to develop case work and share information. Measures Related to Technical Assistance and Capacity Building: Provide Specialized Training: During the post-transition period, to the extent possible, provide funding and/or in-kind expertise to ensure that specialized training by international practitioners from relevant public authorities, whether from the G8 country governments themselves, relevant international organizations and initiatives (such as, inter alia, the World Bank/UN Office of Drugs and Crime Stolen Asset Recovery Initiative - StAR), or other appropriate sources is provided to requesting transition countries. The key topics would include: financial investigations, financial document analysis, asset confiscation and forfeiture, requesting international assistance, asset recovery and asset management tools, and other topics identified by the requesting countries The United States has developed five tailored asset recovery courses for the Deauville Partnership countries. The U.S. Department of Justice delivered four courses (a survey course and three advanced courses) in Egypt in the spring of 2013 and will continue to provide training through the winter of 2014. The United States will deliver a survey course to Yemen in November 2013 and deliver advanced courses in 2014. The United States also plans to deliver the survey course to Libya and Tunisia in early 2014. Under the auspices of the Arab Forum on Asset Recovery, the United States has also provided training on domestic coordination in asset recovery, financial investigations, and the role of civil society in asset recovery. Ongoing In addition, the U.S. Department of Justice has sent attorneys to transition countries to provide training in effective mutual legal assistance and is in the process of negotiating a bilateral

mutual legal assistance treaty with Tunisia which will provide for a broad range of mutual legal assistance. Support domestic coordination: During the post-transition period, assist a requesting transition country in setting up locally an Asset Recovery Task Force (ARTF), as a domestic coordination measure for the transition country partner, comprised of representatives of relevant law enforcement agencies (police, customs, prosecutors, etc) and regulatory bodies (such as financial intelligence units, central banks etc.), among whose functions will be cooperation with international practitioners Promote legal and institutional reforms: During the posttransition period, to the extent possible, assist a requesting transition country in drafting appropriate legislation and/or institutional reforms that will adhere to international standards, including, but not limited to, in pursuing criminal and/or non-conviction based forfeiture legislation; and to establish systems for disclosure of assets and interests by senior public officials and appropriate relations, consistent with international best practices; and other relevant legal frameworks. Urge relevant international organizations to assist in this regard Strengthen frameworks to manage recovered funds: During the post-transition period, to the extent possible, assist a requesting transition country with legislative drafting advice or other assistance in setting up locally a central fund, to The United States provided training at AFAR Special Session I on domestic coordination. In addition, the United States Justice Attaché in Cairo is providing support to the Egyptian authorities as they establish an Asset Recovery Task Force in Egypt. The United States has offered assistance in this area but has not yet received specific bilateral requests. Regionally, the United States supports the UN Development Programme (UNDP) s and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) s regional integrity programs, which, inter alia, assist Deauville Partnership countries in implementing reforms called for in the Asset Recovery Action Plan, with $1.7 million granted to UNDP in 2012-2013 and over $1 million granted in 2012-2013 to OECD. The U.S. has also pledged $50 million to the Deauville Partnership Transition Fund which can support specific projects for technical assistance from Egypt, Tunisia, Libya, Yemen, Jordan and Morocco. Projects related to asset recovery, anti-corruption or related topics are eligible for consideration from the Transition Fund. In addition, the U.S. Department of Justice is in the process of negotiating a bilateral mutual legal assistance treaty with Tunisia which will provide for a broad range of mutual legal assistance. The United States has offered assistance in this area but has not yet received specific bilateral requests for assistance. The United States has worked with international organizations such as the IMF on joint projects for asset Ongoing: The United States is willing and able to provide assistance to Deauville Partnership countries seeking support on domestic coordination of asset recovery. Ongoing: The United States is willing and able to provide assistance to Deauville Partnership countries on legislative and institutional reform. Ongoing: The United States is willing and able to provide assistance to Deauville Partnership countries on legislative and institutional reform.

receive assets confiscated at home or abroad and to ensure transparency in their administration. Support the Arab Forum on Asset Recovery: Support the establishment of and participate as appropriate in the Arab Forum on Asset Recovery, including through financial support, where possible, expertise, and attendance at the inaugural meeting at the appropriate level. management in the region. The United States helped launch the Arab Forum on Asset Recovery (AFAR) in its role as the 2012 G8 Presidency and participated in the first AFAR in Doha, providing a high-level delegation including experienced practitioners to participate in workshops and bilateral casework meetings. In 2013, the United States continued to play an active role, working with the UK, StAR, and Qatar, in the planning and delivery of the three Special Sessions, providing expert trainers and participating in bilateral meetings at all three sessions. The United States also provided funding to the StAR initiative to support its work on AFAR. October 2013: The United States will send a Ministerial-level delegation, supported by senior officials and law enforcement practitioners, to the Second Arab Forum on Asset Recovery in October 2013.