Study of Revenue Implications of 14 th Finance Commission Recommendations and Union Budget FY on Odisha

Similar documents
Annual Plan [Regular Budget]

Planning Commission (Financial Resources Division) ---- Brief for Annual Plan JAMMU & KASHMIR

Annual Plan Planning Commission.

Of Bold Strokes and Fine Prints

Social Security Provisioning in Bihar: A Case for Universal Old Age Pension

4. Taking all these resources into account, the Annual Plan size for Punjab for Annual Plan has been fixed at Rs 16,125 crore.

No. 4/25/2012-FR Planning Commission (Financial Resources Division)

20 th Year of Publication. A monthly publication from South Indian Bank.

Centrally Sponsored Schemes

Impact of the 14 th Finance Commission and CSS Sharing Pattern on Health Expenditures

PROCEEDINGS OF THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA

Kerala Budget Analysis

HIGHLIGHTS OF KARNATAKA S BUDGET

(17 th March, 2016)

Public Financing for Nutrition in Bihar. Working Paper Budget Outlays for Nutrition Sensitive Programmes in Bihar 1

14 th Finance Commission: Review and Outcomes. Economics. February 25, 2015

Medium-term Expenditure Framework Statement laid before Parliament as required under the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act, 2003

Union Budget : An overview

PROCEEDINGS OF THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA. Subject : Release of Funds Delegation of Financial Powers. *****

Kerala Budget Analysis

Odisha Budget Analysis

The achievement of the Annual Plans for the Eleventh Plan is shown below: Achievement of Plan outlay

Planning commission (Financial Resources Division)

CHAPTER-IV REFORMS IN THE CSS

Madhya Pradesh Budget Analysis

Jammu and Kashmir Budget Analysis

Public Expenditure Tracking For Social Sector Programs in India: Case Study of Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan in Nalanda, Bihar

Farmers and rural population

Gram Panchayat Development Plan(GPDP) Ministry of Panchayati Raj

Telangana Budget Analysis

How Responsive is the Union Budget to the MDGs?

REPORT OF THE COMPTROLLER AND AUDITOR GENERAL OF INDIA STATE FINANCES

Honourable Prime Minister and Members of the National Development Council, It gives me immense pleasure to. attend the National Development Council

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Page No.

State Finances of Odisha:

Chapter V Financial Resource Mobilization of PRIs in Karnataka

No. M-13048/35/(PY)/2009-SP-S Government of India Planning Commission (State Plans Division)

Haryana Budget Analysis

INTERIM UNION BUDGET 2019

Pratidhwani the Echo ISSN: (Online) (Print) Impact Factor: 6.28

TAMILNADU STATE FINANCES

BASELINE SURVEY OF MINORITY CONCENTRATION DISTRICT. Executive Summary of Leh District (Jammu and Kashmir)

National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA)

Balanced Regional Development in India Issues and Policies

CONTENTS SL. NO. PARTICULARS PAGE NOS. 1 Preamble 3. 2 CSR Mission 3. 3 Objectives 3. 4 Focus Areas 4. 5 Approach to Implementation 5.

International Journal of Academic Research ISSN: ; Vol.4, Issue-1(1), January, 2017 Impact Factor: 4.535;

1,07,758 cr GoI allocations for Ministry of Rural Development (MoRD) in FY

Analytical Study on the Criteria and Processes for Devolution of Plan Funds through Centrally Sponsored Schemes and Central Assistance

BUDGET: TABLE 1: BUDGET AT A GLANCE (Actuals) A. Revenue Receipts

India s model of inclusive growth: Measures taken, experience gained and lessons learnt

STATE OF STATE FINANCES

Power to the States: New pathways to Intergovernmental fiscal transfers for health

GOVERNMENT OF MADHYA PRADESH APPROPRIATION ACCOUNTS

BUDGET (Highlights)

Fiscal Performance Index Of The States in India An Empirical Model Based Evidences

Telangana Budget Analysis

Chhattisgarh Budget Analysis

Pradhan Mantri Awaas Yojana - Gramin (PMAY-G) Ministry of Rural Development Government of India

UTTAR PRADESH. Tracking Public Investments for Children. Budgeting for Change Series, 2011

GOVERNMENT OF MIZORAM. BUDGET SPEECH of PU LAL THANHAWLA HON BLE CHIEF MINISTER for in the MIZORAM LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY on

An explanatory note on Formats for Union Finances

Union Budget: A Window of Opportunity for Our Children?

A monthly publication from South Indian Bank. To kindle interest in economic affairs... To empower the student community...

RAJASTHAN. Tracking Public Investments for Children. Budgeting for Change Series, 2011

Impact of Multi Sector Development Plan on Muslims: A Case Study of Moradabad District

1,14,915 cr GoI allocations for Ministry of Rural Development (MoRD) in FY

PRESENTATION BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION

How to Read the Union Budget

Budgeting for School Education in Tamil Nadu: What Has Changed and What has not? Policy Brief

ACCOUNTS AT A GLANCE GOVERNMENT OF MADHYA PRADESH

Government Schemes. Pehal- A Max Life CSR initiative

Budget Analysis Rajasthan Budget

BLOSSOM INDUSTRIES LIMITED

No.M.13048/23 (Sikkim)/2008/SP. Planning Commission (State Plans Division)

Budgeting for School Education in Bihar: What Has Changed and What Has Not? Policy Brief

Himachal Pradesh Budget Analysis

Government of Bihar. Particulars

TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No.

Valakom Grama Panchayat Receipt And Payment Statement Schedules

MEDIUM TERM FISCAL POLICY STATEMENT

Odisha. Tracking Public Investments for Children. Budgeting for Change Series, 2011

PROPERTY TAX Repeal Various State Aid, Credit and Property Tax Programs. March 1, 2011

Universalising Social Protection in India: Issues and Challenges

Budget for Children in Assam:

Two Decades of Fiscal Decentralization Reforms In Karnataka: Opportunities, Issues and Challenges

Contents. Who Does the FM Meet? Promises in the Election Manifesto of Congress vs. Initiatives in Union Budget Summary

Assam Budget Analysis

9,000cr GOI allocation for SBM in FY

The first of February was just. A Pittance for Our Children Union Budget

M /Guj/2007-SP (West) Government of India Planning Commission (State Plans Division) Approval of Annual Plan ( ) of Gujarat.

STATE FINANCES for the year ended 31 March 2015

1,07,758 cr GoI allocations for Ministry of Rural Development (MoRD) in FY

Government s Agricultural economic initiatives and challenges ahead

Government of Mizoram R F D. (Results-Framework Document) for. Department of Rural Development ( )

BUDGET FOR CHILDREN WEST BENGAL TO Society for Peoples Awareness (SPAN) A Study by : Supported by : UNICEF, West Bengal

`6,244 cr GOI allocations for Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation(MoDWS) in FY

Distribution of Public Spending across Health Facilities: A study of Karnataka, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh and Assam

SAILENT FEATURERS OF THE BUDGET SPEECH OF HON. FINANCE MINISTER SHRI SUDHIR MUNGANTIWAR ON WEDNESDAY, 18 TH MARCH Part 1

ANNUAL PLAN Government of Punjab Department of Planning

Budgeting for School Education in West Bengal: What Has Changed and What has not? Policy Brief

Transcription:

S.R. No. 005 11/2015/CEFT Study of Revenue Implications of 14 th Finance Commission Recommendations and Union Budget FY 2015-16 on Odisha 1. Recommendations of Fourteenth Finance Commission The recommendation of finance commission (FC) broadly comprises of tax devolution from Centre to States, non-plan grant & loan to State, central assistance for States & UTs and assistance for central and centrally sponsored schemes. The fourteenth finance commission (FFC) recommends to raise the tax devolution from 32 percent to 42 percent from total divisible pool which is a weighted base formula, i.e. fiscal capacity had been given weightage 47.5 percent in thirteenth finance commission (TFC) but in FFC it has been increased to 50 percent, population of 1971 has been given 25 percent and 17.5 percent in TFC and FFC respectively, population of 2011 is newly introduced with a weightage of 10 percent, the area of the States has 10 percent and 15 percent of weightage in TFC and FFC respectively, fiscal discipline has been deleted in FFC whereas the weightage of 17.5 percent was represented in TFC and the forest cover which plays an opportunity cost for the States, has been given 7.5 percent weightage in this FFC recommendations. Similarly, the changing revenue sharing pattern in CSS, removing some of major schemes in CSS and restructuring of both plan & non plan grants are the major changes in the FFC recommendations. 2. Union Budget 2015-16 The recommendations of FFC are reflected in the Union Budget 2015-16. To examine the impact of recommendations of FFC on the Union Budget 2015-16, a comparative study is carried out with respect to Union Budget 2014-15(B.E). The following observations are made from the comparative analysis of the Budget Estimate of the Union Government (see Table 1). 1 P a g e

A compositional shift in 2015-16(BE) is established as compared to 2014-15(BE). Because of recommendations of FFC, States' share of taxes and Duties has increased by 37% in 2015-16(BE). Besides, Non Plan Grants & Loans to States has gone up by 55.14% in 2015-16(BE). However, the rise in Non Plan Grants & Loans to States has been completely neutralized by a significant decline in Plan Grants & Loans to States by 40.62%. It is further noticed that, during 2015-16(BE), the Non Plan Grants & Loans to States have increased by Rs. 3,8611 crore with respect 2014-15(BE), whereas the Plan Grants & Loans to States have declined drastically by Rs.1,33,934 crore. This shift clearly indicates an adverse impact of the Central funding towards the States in terms of Centrally Sponsored Schemes (CSS), Normal Central Assistance (NCA), Additional Central Assistance (ACA) and Special Central Assistance (SCA). It is also observed that the rise in Non Plan Grants & Loans to States will be mainly used for the purpose of post devolution revenue grants. Therefore, both the State specific and Sector specific grants will be adversely affected. The total transfer to States relative to Gross Tax Revenue of Centre is calculated at 57.15% in 2015-16(BE) which is lower (57.31%) than 2014-15(BE). The total Transfer to States relative to Gross Revenue Receipt of Centre is estimated at 49.57% in 2015-16(BE) which is lower (48.58%) than 2014-15(BE). The total Transfer to States relative to GDP is estimated at 5.87 % in 2015-16(BE) which is lower (6.07%) than 2014-15(BE). 2 P a g e

Table 1: Compositional Shift in Union Budget on Account of FFC Recommendations (In crores of Rupees) 2014-15 2015-16 Change (Y-O-Y) BE BE Sl. No Particulars A B C= (B/A)-1 1 States' share of taxes and Duties 382216 523958 37.08% 2 Non-Plan Grants & Loans to States 70019 108630 55.14% 3 Plan Grants & Loans to States 329712 195778-40.62% 4=(2+3) Total Grants & Loans to States 399731 304408-23.85% 5=(4+1) Total Transfer to States 781947 828366 5.94% 6 Gross Tax Revenue of Centre 1364524 1449490 6.23% 7 Non Tax Revenue of Centre 212505 221733 4.34% 8=(6+7) Gross Revenue Receipts 1577029 1671223 5.97% 9 GDP at Current Prices(B.E) 12876653 14108945 9.57% 10=(5/6) 11=(5/8) Total Transfer to States relative to Gross Tax Revenue of Centre Total Transfer to States relative to Gross Revenue Receipt of Centre 57.31% 57.15% -0.27% 49.58% 49.57% -0.03% 12=(5/9) Total Transfer to States relative to GDP 6.07% 5.87% -3.32% 3. Objective of the Study The objective of the study is to examine the impact of recommendations of FFC and Union Budget 2015-16 on the total Central Transfer (both Share tax and Grants from Centre) to Odisha at a disaggregated level. The State Budget 2015-16 was presented before the declaration of the recommendations of the FFC and presentation of the Union Budget 2015-16. Hence, the net impact due to Share Tax and Grants from Centre is calculated based upon the Budget Provision of Govt. of Odisha 2015-16 as it captures unanticipated revenue implications. 3 P a g e

4. Estimation The FFC recommendations mainly impact the revenue flow to Odisha on account of Share Tax, Removal of both Sector & State specific Grants, Schemes delinked from Central Assistance, Withdrawal of Normal Central Assistance and restructuring of revenue sharing pattern between Centre and State on 33 nos. of identified CSS. 4.1 Impact due to Share Tax The weighted average Share of Odisha (horizontal share) in FFC is calculated at 4.659%. The Share of Odisha is Rs.24, 411.60 crore in the divisible pool (States' share of taxes and Duties) of Rs 5, 23,958 crore in FY 2015-16. This Rs. 5, 23,958 crore in 2015-16 is 42% (Vertical Share) of Net Proceeds of Taxes of the Centre, budgeted for FY 2015-16. Hence, Net Tax Proceeds of the Centre budgeted for FY 2015-16 is calculated at Rs.12, 47,519 crore (Rs 5, 23,958/42%). During 13 th FC (2014-15), 32% (Vertical Share) of Net Tax Revenue of the Centre was the divisible pool (States' share of taxes and Duties). On the assumption of continuance of 13 th FC award (no change in the formula of FFC), the Net Tax Proceeds of the Centre, the divisible pool (States' share of taxes and Duties) in FY 2015-16 would have been Rs.3,99,206 crore(32%* Rs.12, 47,519 crore). During 13 th FC (2014-15), the weighted average Share of Odisha (horizontal share) was at 4.793%. Applying this 4.793% share to the net proceed of Rs.3,99,206 crore, the share tax, the estimated revenue for Odisha in FY 2015-16 would have been Rs.19,132 crore (4.793%.*3,99,206 crore). 4 P a g e

Hence, net gain on account of FFC recommendations on account of Share Tax is calculated at Rs.5279.58 crore (Rs.24, 411.60 crore - Rs.19,132 crore). 4.2 Impact due Sector & State Specific Grants 13th FC (TFC) had made the provision of grants-in aid for five specific segments; i) Revenue deficit, ii) disaster relief iii) local bodies iv) sector-specific schemes iv) statespecific schemes. The 14th FC recommends grants-in aid only for Post Devolution Revenue Deficit, Local Government and Disaster Management. 4.2.1 Sector Specific Grants: The moot objective of sector specific grants was to augment expenditure in specific sectors with a high degree of externalities in order to ensure desired minimum level of expenditures in every state. The 14th FC has not recommended any sector-specific grants for crucial sectors such as education, drinking water, roads & bridges, and district innovation. The revenue loss to Odisha on account of withdrawal of sector specific grants is estimated in the table 2 given below. Table 2: Loss on Account of Sector Specific Grants(Rs. Crore) 754.66 Grants for Maintenance of Roads & Bridges 291.00 Water Sector Management 46.00 Improvement of of Statistical Systems at State and District Level 6.00 Employee & Pension Database 7.50 Grants for improving Delivery of Justice 38.72 Forest Sector Grants 82.74 Grants for Elementary Education 232.00 Grants for UID 35.70 District Innovation Fund 15.00 4.2.2 State Specific Grants: The State specific Grants aim to address the needs specified by the States, which are to take care of deprivation, generate significant externalities and meet the needs of the marginal groups/areas. As no categorization of states in terms of 5 P a g e

Special Category vs Non Special Category States has been recommended by the 14th Finance Commission, the revenue loss is estimated in table 3 given below. Table 3: State Specific Grants 436.25 Eco restoration of Chilika Lake 12.50 Construction of Anganwadi Centres 100.00 Upgradation of Health infrastructure 87.50 Incentive Grant for Energy Sector 125.00 Police Training 17.50 Upgradation of Jails 25.00 Fire Service 37.50 Preservation of Monuments and Buddhist Heritage 16.25 Establishment of Market Yard 15.00 4.3 Impact due to Normal Central Assistance(NCA) The distribution of the NCA is formula based and is an untied assistance to States. This has been withdrawn, as recommended by 14th Finance Commission. The revenue loss on account of withdrawal of NCA is estimated at Rs.732.17 crore in FY 2015-16. 4.4 Impact due to Schemes delinked from Central Support As 8nos. of Centrally Sponsored Schemes have been delinked from support of the Centre, the revenue loss on that account is estimated at Rs.1854 crore. Out of these eight schemes both Backward Region Grant Fund (BRGF) and National Scheme for Modernization of Police and other Forces contributes 86.27 % of total revenue loss whereas the BRGF alone contributes to 66.15% of the total loss. The scheme wise loss is depicted in the following table 4. 6 P a g e

Table 4: Delinked Schemes Loss(Rs. Crore) % Share Backward Regions Grant Funds 1226.51 66.15% National Scheme for Modernisation of Police and other Forces 372.89 20.11% Scheme for Setting up of 6000 Model Schools at Block level at Benchmark of Excellence 141.74 7.64% Rajiv Gandhi Panchayat Sasaktikaran Abhiyan (RGPSA) 50.00 2.70% NEGAP 24.71 1.33% Assistance to States for Infrastructure Development for Exports (ASIDE) 16.86 0.91% Tourist Infrastructure 13.63 0.74% National Mission on Food processing 7.71 0.42% Total 1854.05 100.00% 4.5 Impact due to Change in Sharing Pattern of 33 nos. of Centrally Sponsored Schemes Considering the recommendations of the 14 th Finance Commission, the Union Budget 2015-16 has declared that 31 Schemes are to be fully sponsored by the Union Government, 8 Schemes have been delinked from support of the Centre (mentioned above) and 33 Schemes are expected to be run with the changed sharing pattern. The Centre-State funding pattern is being modified wherein the State s contribution in the total shares will go up, as per the recommendations of 14th Finance Commission. This will have additional burden on the State exchequer on account of these 33 numbers of CSS. The State Budget 2015-16 has made a provision of Rs.12, 859.60 crore on account of these 33 CSS, as per the approved work plan. The Central Share is worked out at Rs.9208.16 crore. As per the data available, by applying the expected new share pattern the Central Share will decrease to Rs.6111.41 crore. Hence, additional burden 7 P a g e

on the State is estimated at Rs. 3096.75 crore. The details are given in the following table 5 in Annexure 1. 5. Summary of Results On account of the recommendations of 14 th Finance Commission, the net loss to the State revenue (additional burden) is estimated at Rs.1594.30 crore. Table 6 : Net Impact on the State Description Impact (Rs. Crore) A. Net Gain from Share Tax 5279.58 B. (2+3+4+5) Net Loss from Central Assistance 6873.88 2 Normal Central Assistance 732.17 3 Schemes Delinked from Central Assistance as indicated in Union Budget 2015-16 4 Schemes identified to run with Changed Sharing Pattern (as per Union Budget and indications received from Ministries/ Line Departments) 5 State specific & other 13th Finance Commission Grants (not available as per recommendations of 14th Finance Commission ) Net Loss (B-A) 1854.05 3096.75 1190.91 1594.30 8 P a g e

Annexure 1 Sl. No Table 5: Changed sharing pattern of 33 nos. of CSS (Rs crore) Name of the Scheme Schemes identified to run with Changed Sharing Pattern 2015-16/ Approved Work Plan 1 Existing Share Pattern 2015-16 Centre Share (as per Approved Work Plan) 2 Expected New Share Pattern Estimated Central Share due to expected Change in Share Pattern 3 Estimated Loss to State in FY 2015-16 4=(2-3) 12859.60 9208.16 6111.41 3096.75 1 National Food Security Mission 87.41 100% 87.41 50% 43.71 43.71 2 National Horticulture Mission 128.30 85%-15% 109.06 50% 64.15 44.91 3 4 5 National Mission on Sustainable Agriculture National Oilseed and Oil Palm Mission National Mission on Agriculture Extension & Technology 45.41 50%:50% 22.71 50% 22.71 0.00 22.99 75%:25% 17.24 50% 11.49 5.75 87.63 85%:15% 74.48 50% 43.81 30.67 6 RKVY 554.54 100% 554.54 50% 277.27 277.27 7 8 9 10 11 Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) National Livestock Management Programme National Livestock Health & Disease Control Programme(LHDC) National Plan for Dairy Devp.(NPCDD) National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP) 251.67 90%:10% 226.50 50% 125.84 100.67 12.68 90%:10% 11.41 50% 6.34 5.07 18.24 90%:10% 16.41 50% 9.12 7.29 15.22 75%:25% 11.42 50% 7.61 3.81 469.11 75%:25% 351.83 50% 234.55 117.28 12 Swachh Bharat Abhiyan 666.70 75%:25% 500.03 50% 333.35 166.68 13 14 15 16 National Afforestation Programme (National Mission for a Green India) Conservation of Natural Resources & Ecosystem Integrated Development of Wild Life Habitats National Health Mission including NRHM 19.80 100% 19.80 50% 9.90 9.90 2.20 70%:30% 1.54 50% 1.10 0.44 4.29 75%:25% 3.22 50% 2.15 1.07 1088.32 75%:25% 816.24 50% 544.16 272.08 9 P a g e

17 18 19 National Mission on Ayush including Mission on Medicinal Plants National AIDS & STD Control Programme National Urban Livelihood Mission 14.51 75%:25% 10.88 50% 7.26 3.63 46.39 100% 46.39 60% 27.83 18.56 35.00 75%:25% 26.25 75% 26.25 0.00 20 Rajiv Awas Yojana 75%:25% 0.00 0.00 21 National River Conservation Programme (NRCP) 22 SarvaShikshaAbhiyan (SSA) 2250.00 65%:35% 1462.50 50% 1125.00 337.50 23 24 25 National Programme Nutritional Support to Primary Education (MDM) Rashtriya Madhyamik Shiksha Abhiyan (RMSA) Rashtriya Uchachatar Shiksha Abhiyan (RUSA) 760.00 75%:25% 570.00 75% 570.00 0.00 874.00 75%:25% 655.50 75% 655.50 0.00 85.00 65%:35% 55.25 65% 55.25 0.00 26 Skill Development Mission 10.92 75%:25% 8.19 75% 8.19 0.00 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 Development of Infrastructure Facilities for Judiciary including Gram Nyayalayas Rural Housing - Housing for All (IAY) National Rural Livelihood Mission (NRLM) National Land Record Management Programme (NLRMP) Integrated Child Devp. Service (ICDS) Accelerated Irrigation Benefit Programme(AIBP) & other water resources programme Panchayat Yuva Krida aur Khel Abhiyan (PYKKA) 15.61 75%:25% 11.71 50% 7.81 3.90 1286.16 75%:25% 964.62 50% 643.08 321.54 367.69 75%:25% 275.77 50% 183.85 91.92 4.00 100% 4.00 50% 2.00 2.00 1734.36 50%:50% 867.18 50% 867.18 0.00 1889.39 75%:25% 1417.04 10% 188.94 1228.10 12.07 75%:25% 9.05 50% 6.04 3.02 10 P a g e