Revenues. Property Tax. Property Tax Revenue vs. Assessed Valuations

Similar documents
Revenues. Property Tax

DEFINITION OF REVENUE SOURCES GENERAL FUND

Budget Introduction Proposed Budget

Final Report Review of the Fiscal Year Revenue Estimates Included in the Proposed Operating Budget for the City of Dallas

CITY OF LANCASTER FISCAL BUDGET REVENUE SOURCES

TOP SIX GENERAL FUND REVENUES

CITY OF LANCASTER FISCAL BUDGET REVENUE SOURCES

General Fund Revenue Summary

City of Modesto Revenue Manual Date: 1 July 2017

City and County of San Francisco

CITY OF LOS ANGELES. Revenue Outlook. Supplement to the Proposed Budget

Urban Analytics FISCAL ANALYSIS FOR THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE

SUPPLEMENT TO THE PROPOSED BUDGET REVENUE OUTLOOK AS PRESENTED BY MAYOR ANTONIO R. VILLARAIGOSA

Seven General Fund Taxes

Supplement to the Proposed Budget Mayor Antonio R. Villaraigosa

Description of Fund Types and Funds

City of Modesto Revenue Manual Date: 1 July 2018

CITY OF LOS ANGELES FISCAL YEAR BUDGET

Fiscal and Economic Impact Analysis of Proposed IKEA in Dublin, California

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO STATISTICAL SECTION

CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ADELAIDE METCALFE. Financial Statements. December 31, 2015

CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ADELAIDE METCALFE. Financial Statements. December 31, 2016

Accounting for Local Revenue Realignments Adopted in the State of California Budget (Including Triple Flip )

San Francisco Multi-Purpose Venue Project. Fiscal Impact Analysis: Revenues. Draft Report. Prepared for: The City and County of San Francisco

The City of Vacaville. Established 1850 OPERATING BUDGET AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY 2010/2011

How to Read the Budget

mjgc revoct06 CalifroniaCityFinance.Com Page1 of 5

Proposed Budget. Fiscal Year Revenue Overview

COMPARISON OF SALES, HOTEL AND PROPERTY TAX REVENUES AMONG MUNICIPAL JURISDICTIONS IN SANTA BARBARA COUNTY

Budget Summary Fiscal Year 2015/2016

City of Benicia. Rate Study Update: Water & Wastewater Rates

City of San Mateo Economic and Revenue Forecast

BUDGET FOOTNOTES GENERAL FUND REVENUES

CITY OF LOS ANGELES. Revenue Outlook. Supplement to the Proposed Budg et Prepared by the City Administrative Officer - April 2016

SALES & USE TAX HIGHLIGHTS COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA, Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2015

Glossary of Property Tax Terms

TOWN OF CARY OPERATING BUDGET ORDINANCE

Understanding the Basics of County and City Revenues (Footnoted Version)

California Municipal Treasurer s Association April 18, 2014 Burlingame, CA

FY 2018 Revenue Manual CITY OF ST. AUGUSTINE

Memorandum. Background memorandum for Independence/Constitution Project fiscal impact analysis

Economic Analysis & Revenue Assumptions

Quarterly Financial Status Report

CITY. RIALTO W w w. R I a l t o c a. g o v. Fiscal Year 2009/10 Interim Financial Report. 5 months ended November 30, 2009

March 1, Honorable Eric Garcetti, Mayor SUBJECT: FINANCIAL FORECAST REPORT MARCH 1, 2016

Overview Property Taxes. Proposition 13

TAX POLICY BACKGROUND

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council

Dave Culver, Finance Director Doris Koo, Treasury and Budget Manager. Walter Kieser, Richard Berkson, and Ashleigh Kanat

SALES & USE TAX HIGHLIGHTS

SKECHERS HERMOSA BEACH DESIGN CENTER & EXECUTIVE OFFICES

City of Elko, Nevada FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2018

PROJECTED CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE

Courtroom, Legislative, and Ballot Box Strategy Response to the State s Fiscal Problems

APPENDIX A THE COUNTY

FY 08/09 ADOPTED GENERAL FUND REVENUES $224,391,325

APPLICATION OF THE REVENUE RECOGNITION CRITERIA SET FORTH IN GASB NO. 33 TO REVENUE SOURCES SIGNIFICANT TO CALIFORNIA CITIES

CITY OF BREVARD

Fiscal Analysis of the City of Palo Alto 2030 Comprehensive Plan

A Report of the Economic Impact of Sanderson Farms in Mineola, Texas

Notice of a public hearing

Fiscal Impact Analysis

FY 13 Funding Sources General Fund

APPENDIX A THE COUNTY

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM K-1

March 1, Honorable Eric Garcetti, Mayor Honorable Members of the City Council City of Los Angeles, California SUBJECT: REVENUE FORECAST REPORT

City of Manassas, Virginia City Council Meeting AGENDA. City Council Special Meeting

Santiago Canyon College Budget Forum December 6, 2011 December 6, 201

City of Los Altos, CA

2018 Five Year Financial Plan

FY 09/10 ADOPTED GENERAL FUND REVENUES $218,840,522

Fully Utilized Transportation Funding Sources

Daytona Beach, FL, City of

Revenue Overview FY 2019 PROPOSED BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS. County Board Work Session February 28, 2018

FY15 APPROPRIATIONS. Specific highlights for the General Fund, Special Capital

State-Collected Local Taxes: Basis of Distribution

Redevelopment and Financial Consulting 225 Holmfirth Court Phone: (916) Roseville CA FAX: (916) ANNUAL REPORT

FY 12 Funding Sources General Fund

DEBT SERVICE FUNDS DEBT SERVICE FUNDS. Variance with. Budgeted Amounts. Original Final Amounts Over (Under) REVENUES:

The May Revision estimates that major General Fund revenues will be higher than

REVENUES AND APPROPRIATIONS

CITY OF BANNING, CALIFORNIA FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2016

CITY of BANNING. Fiscal Year 2011/12 Interim Financial Report. 6 months ended, December 2011 (50% of the year complete)

1.0 FISCAL BENEFITS OF PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN

FY 2013/14 Proposed Operating Budget

Attachment B. City of Banning. INTERIM FINANCIAL REPORT Fiscal Year months ended, December 2014(50% of the year complete)

Revenue vs Expense for February 2019

ALAMEDA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT, ZONE 7

CITY OF SAN MATEO. Administrative Report

Third Quarter Financial Report Fiscal Year and. Mid-Term Budget Update - Fiscal Year June 15, 2015

Concord s Historic Beebe House

Revenue vs Expense for December 2017

CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH FY ADOPTED SUMMARY BUDGET

CITY OF OCEANSIDE FINANCIAL STATUS REPORT Fiscal Year Fourth Quarter Ending June 30, 2017

Finances (Adopted 1969, updated 1975, redone 1976, 1977, 1981 and 1995.)

City of La Mesa La Mesa, California. Basic Financial Statements and Independent Auditor s Report

CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF MALAHIDE. Consolidated Financial Statements

Publication MISSISSIPPI STATE AND LOCAL TAX DEVELOPMENTS IN November 7, 2008

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SECOND EXTRA SESSION 1996 CHAPTER 13 HOUSE BILL 18

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) About Chatham Borough s Water and Sewer Revenue Systems

Transcription:

Property Tax Although property tax has historically been the largest revenue source for the City s General Fund, currently it is a close second to the sales tax revenue. During fiscal year 2012-13, the local real estate market started to rebound from the recession resulting in an increase in property tax and assessed valuation. Property tax and assessed valuation have now recovered to pre-recession levels. The City has projected increases of 5% each year in property tax revenue during the current budget cycle based upon estimates provided by the County Assessor. Property tax projections include Affected Taxing Entity (ATE) payments from the former Redevelopment Agency (RDA). As a result of the dissolution of the RDA, ATE payments are received by the City as part of the Recognized Obligations Payment Schedule (ROPS) process. The ATE payments are the City's proportionate share of funds remaining in the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) after ROPS requirements have been met. Property Tax Revenue vs. Assessed Valuations $35,000,000 $30,000,000 $25,000,000 $20,000,000 $15,000,000 $10,000,000 $5,000,000 Property Tax Revenue Assessed Valuations $18,000,000,000 $16,000,000,000 $14,000,000,000 $12,000,000,000 $10,000,000,000 $8,000,000,000 $6,000,000,000 $4,000,000,000,000 197

Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF) Loss History ERAF is the mechanism by which the State of California uses local entity property tax revenue to meet the State s statutory requirement to fund education. The City is anticipating additional ERAF losses of close to $8.8 million in each of the fiscal years covered in the current Financial Plan. The cumulative loss of property tax revenue to the City of Livermore since the inception of ERAF in fiscal year 1992-93 is a staggering $136 million with additional ERAF losses of the former Redevelopment Agency totaling an additional $2.6 million. City of Livermore ERAF Takeaways by the State Combined City ERAF Losses $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 198

Sales Tax Sales Tax revenue emerged as the General Fund s largest individual revenue source in FY 2013-14 and will continue to be the number one revenue source during the forecast period. Sales tax revenue is volatile and fluctuates with economic trends. The City receives a 1% share of all taxable sales generated within its borders. Sales taxes are imposed on the total retail price of tangible personal property and are authorized under the Constitution, Article XIII 29, Cal. 7200, 37101. The State Board of California Equalization, under the 1955 Bradley-Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Tax Law, administers sales taxes. On March 2, 2004, California Voters approved Prop 57, the California Economic Recovery Bond Act. The measure authorized $15 billion in state bonds, which would be repaid without any increase in taxes. This was implemented via the "Triple Flip" of sales taxes and reduced the City's sales tax rate by 1/4 of one cent as of July 1, 2004. In turn, these monies would be returned, or "backfilled", to the City by Alameda County through the Sales and Use Tax Compensation Fund (SUTCF). A consequence of this change is that 1/4 of the sales taxes, remitted to the City, occurs in a different time frame from the 3/4 base amount because the SUTCF payment is estimated a year in advance by the State Department of Finance (DOF). The state bonds are anticipated to be paid off in full in FY 2015-16 which will eliminate the Triple Flip sales tax for property tax exchange. It is estimated that the final true-up payment associated with the Triple Flip will be made in August 2016 and will be accrued back to fiscal year 2015-16. Sales tax growth in 2016-17 reflects the restoration of full one percent rate on taxable sales with the conclusion of the Triple Flip in 2015-16. The City anticipates continued growth in sales tax revenue due to steady economic expansion coupled with an increasing sales tax base. Sales and Use Tax and SalesTax Comp Fund Revenues Sales & Use Tax Sales Tax Comp Fund $30,000,000 $25,000,000 $20,000,000 $15,000,000 $10,000,000 $5,000,000 199

Garbage Franchise Fee Waste Management, also known as the Livermore Dublin Disposal Company, was the City s service provider through June 2010. The City received 10% of gross revenues. In July 1, 2010 the City entered into a new franchise agreement with Livermore Sanitation Inc. The new agreement increased franchise fees from 10% to 11% of gross revenue in FY 2010-11. In addition, since July 1 st, 2010, rate increases have resulted in an increase in Garbage Franchise Fee revenues. Garbage Franchise Revenue 3,000,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,000,000.00 500,000.00 0.00 200

Cable Television Franchise Fee Prior to January 2007, the City of Livermore was the local franchising authority for cable television. With the passage of the Digital Infrastructure and Video Competition act of 2006 (DIVCA), the California Public Utilities Commission became the sole cable television franchising authority. AT&T and Comcast both now hold franchise agreements for City of Livermore cable television services with the state. DIVCA still requires both franchise holders to pay the City 5% of their gross revenues on a quarterly basis from providing services in the City. FY 2000-01 contains a one-time adjustment of $403,170 to reflect GASB 33 revenues for the January June 2001 period. $1,400,000 Cable Franchise Revenue $1,200,000 $800,000 $600,000 $400,000 $200,000 201

Electric and Gas Franchise Taxes For general law cities, the Broughton Act restricts city collection of franchise payments to 2% of gross annual receipts. The Franchise Act of 1937 has a 2% cap, but includes a minimum fee of.5% for electric franchises or 1 % for gas franchises operating within the city limits. Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) is the City of Livermore service provider. These Franchise Taxes remain a stable revenue source for the City. Electric and Gas Franchise Revenues Electric Gas $500,000 $450,000 $400,000 $350,000 $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 202

Business License Tax The recession had a negative impact on business license tax revenue beginning in fiscal year 2008-09 which lasted five years. Additionally, fiscal year 2011-12 is being impacted by the loss of one of the City s traditionally larger business license tax generators which moved outside of the City. Business license revenues have rebounded during the recent economic upswing. The City is anticipating business license tax revenues continuing to strengthen in the next couple of years due increases in retail and commercial development. Business License Revenue vs. Number of Licenses Business License Revenue Number of Licenses $5,000,000 $4,500,000 $4,000,000 $3,500,000 $3,000,000 $2,500,000 $1,500,000 $500,000 10,000 9,000 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 203

Tax on Residential Construction (TORC) / Industrial Construction (TOIC) In 1982, the TORC tax was imposed under LMC 3.08.640 upon the construction of residential units in the city. The tax rate is 1.75% of the cost of construction and not less than $650/unit. In 1995 a refund of four prior years of revenues was made in the amount of $1,428,887 in settlement of a lawsuit by developers based on violations of the special tax provisions of the California Constitution. In 1984, the TOIC tax was imposed under LMC 3.08.750 upon the construction of industrial units in the city. The tax rate is 1.75% of the cost of construction. Development of residential and industrial properties has been severely impacted by the economy resulting in much lower revenue levels since the height of the real estate market. Although development has begun to increase during the past fiscal year, the City does not anticipate a return to historical levels. Tax on Residential (TORC) / Industrial Construction Revenue (TOIC) $3,000,000 TORC TOIC $2,500,000 $1,500,000 $500,000 204

Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) Transient Occupancy Tax is imposed on persons staying 30 days or less in a lodging facility. The tax is authorized under Revenue and Taxation Code 7280-7281. The tax rate in Livermore is 8% and was changed from 6.5% on October 1, 1983. While no new rooms have been added since fiscal year 2005-06, several existing hotels are in the process of upgrading their facilities. The economic recovery, fueled by commercial and residential development has had a positive impact on hotel room stays and this trend is expected to continue through the end of the budget cycle. Transient Occupancy Tax Revenues vs. Total Number of Hotel Rooms Transient Occupancy Tax Total Number of Hotel Rooms $3,000,000 1,400 $2,500,000 1,200 $1,500,000 1,000 800 600 400 $500,000 200 0 205

Documentary Transfer Tax The Documentary Transfer Tax is imposed on any real estate transfer of ownership and is authorized under the Revenue and Taxation Code 11911-11929. These taxes are collected by Alameda County at the rate of $1.10 per $1000 of valuation. As a general law city, Livermore receives one-half of the amounts collected and the County keeps the other half. The large increase in FY 2004-2005 was due to the California housing boom occurring at that time and also includes the effects of increased local building, as well as increased sales prices of existing properties. This revenue source has stabilized during the past three years and is anticipated to remain relatively flat at the current level for the remainder of this budget cycle. Documentary Transfer Tax Revenue $1,200,000 $800,000 $600,000 $400,000 $200,000 206

Motor Vehicle License Fee The State Revenue and Taxation code imposes an annual license fee of 2% of the market value of motor vehicles in lieu of a local motor vehicle property tax. Due to the State budget act of 2004, the timing of the payments and the method of calculation has changed dramatically. The majority of the Motor Vehicle In-Lieu Tax revenue was replaced by Property Tax In-Lieu of Vehicle License Fee revenue, although for reporting purposes, it is still considered Motor Vehicle In-Lieu Tax revenue. Most recently, in an effort to balance their budget, the State of California passed SB89 which, effective July 1, 2011, eliminates the allocation of the non-property Tax In-Lieu portion of Vehicle License Fee revenue to Cities. This results in a reduction of revenue for the City of approximately $450,000 per year. Vehicle License Fee (VLF) and VLF Comp Fund Revenues VLF VLF Comp Fund $8,000,000 $7,000,000 $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 207

Water Revenue Water services for the entire City of Livermore are provided by two water retailers. The City of Livermore Municipal Water serves approximately one-third of the City and the California Water Service Company serves the balance of the City. The City of Livermore purchases water from the Zone 7 Water Agency and then distributes the water to the customers in the City of Livermore Municipal Water service area. The City has a combined residential and commercial customer base of just under 10,000 water accounts. Each water bill consists of a flat rate meter service charge based on the size of meter that is located at the property, a pass-through wholesale water charge, and a consumption charge for water used at the property. Residential customers are billed for consumption based on three tiers, while the commercial accounts are billed for consumption based on two tiers. The City of Livermore also provides recycled water that is used for irrigation. Recycled water is billed based on 80% of the tier 2 residential rate by Council policy. Since April 2014 the State of California has been experiencing a severe drought. Due to the drought the City had to enact Stage 3 water rates. In December 2014, the Stage 3 rates were reduced to Stage 1. At present time, the State of California has not lifted the drought restrictions. Municipal Water Revenue vs. Number of Active Accounts Municipal Water Revenue Number of Active Accounts $14,000,000 12,000 $12,000,000 10,000 $10,000,000 8,000 $8,000,000 6,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 4,000 2,000 0 208

Sewer Revenues Sewer revenues are generated for collection, treatment and disposal of wastewater generated by residents and businesses in the City of Livermore. Residential service charges are collected as part of the Alameda County Property Tax Roll. Residential sewer charges are set as a flat rate. Single family homes pay $489.00 per year as part of the property tax bill. This charge equates to $40.75 per month. Condominium and Multi-Family residential rates are $27.60 per month and $22.65 per month respectively. Commercial accounts are charged for sewer service based on the amount of water that flows through their water meter. Commercial service charge rates vary from $4.00 per 100 cubic feet of water to $9.00 per 100 cubic feet of water based on user classification. The City also collects fees from the customers needing special permits for sewer discharge and treatment. Sewer rates have remained unchanged since 2008. A sewer rate increase was approved May 11, 2015 by the City Council which approved two years of rate increases. The first increase was effective on July 8, 2015 and the next increase will be effective on July 1, 2016. Historical Sewer Revenue Sewer Revenue $25,000,000 $20,000,000 $15,000,000 $10,000,000 $5,000,000 209

Airport Revenues Airport revenues are primarily comprised of short- and medium-term hangar and tie-down space rents as well as long-term ground lease rents. Lease revenue is also received from non-aviation businesses located on Airport property. The Airport leases 393 hangar units and has approximately 200 aircraft tie-down spaces available. Over 500 aircraft are currently based at the Airport and all hangar units are occupied. Due to significant demand for hangar space, staff maintains an extensive hangar waiting list. The sale of aviation fuels accounts for a substantial portion of all income. Revenues from fuel sales were expected to drop in FY 14/15 as a result of Five Rivers Aviation, LLC, a full-service Fixed Base Operator (FBO), completing construction of new facilities and assuming the fuel sales. However, construction was delayed and it is projected that fuel sales will be assumed by the FBO by mid FY 15/16, reducing the Airport s fuel sales revenue by 50%. In addition to new FBO ground rent, only revenues from fuel flowage fees and the lease of the Airport s fuel farm will be earned during FY 16/17. Historical Airport Revenue Historical Airport Revenue $4,500,000 $4,000,000 $3,500,000 $3,000,000 $2,500,000 Fuel Sales $3,500,000 $3,000,000 $2,500,000 Rent Revenue $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $500,000 $500,000 210