Loss Prevention Strategy & Framework for Manitoba Public Insurance

Similar documents
Combining Financial Management and Collections to Increase Revenue and Efficiency

Copyright Sopheon plc. All rights reserved worldwide. Next

Affecting Capital Planning and Investment Control (CPIC)

CATEGORY 8 PLANNING CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT

Introduction. The Assessment consists of: A checklist of best, good and leading practices A rating system to rank your company s current practices.

IFRS 9 Moving Forward 2015

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Office of Audit and Evaluation. Audit of Major Capital Project Management

Enhanced Cyber Risk Management Standards. Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

Resource Allocation Charter Document

PEFA Training. Dakar, Senegal January & February 1, #PEFA. PEFA Secretariat

GHANA AID HARMONISATION AND EFFECTIVENESS MATRIX

PROPOSED INTER- AGENCY AGREEMENT (IAA) PILOT

Version 2.0- Project. Q: What is the current status of your project? A: Completed

21 out of the 24 (88%) investors surveyed said the model was equally relevant or more relevant than the existing climate assessments.

Brief course information Strategic planning and project selection Project integration management Project scope management

CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING TRAINING AND EDUCATION APPLICATIONS RESEARCH AND WORKPLACE INNOVATION PROGRAM 27/02/2017

Guidelines. on PD estimation, LGD estimation and the treatment of defaulted exposures EBA/GL/2017/16 20/11/2017

Part A: Strategic assessment

Risk Management Strategy

Treasury Board Secretariat. Follow-Up on VFM Section 3.07, 2015 Annual Report RECOMMENDATION STATUS OVERVIEW

Commonwealth Research and Technology Strategic Roadmap

Cabinet (Performance Management) Panel 12 June 2017

Increase career awareness Build the pipeline Foster retention and development in the career Improve and strengthen the organization

INDIVIDUAL CONSULTANT PROCUREMENT NOTICE TOR - CONSULTANCY IC/2012/026. Date: 16 April 2012

PRISM Supervisory Commentary 2018

UCISA TOOLKIT. Major Project Governance Assessment. version 1.0

TERMS OF REFERENCE TRANSFORMATION OF THE TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO POSTAL CORPORATION

SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

CIVIC. partnerships. Guide to Policy & Administration

Duration of Assignment: Apprx. 150 working days from January to September 2015

Duration of Assignment: Approx. 150 working days from January to September 2015

Public Private Partnerships. Alberta Infrastructure Guidance Document

Program: Library Services Program Based Budget Page 199

MANITOBA PUBLIC INSURANCE ANNUAL BUSINESS PLAN

Review Criteria. Robotics Program. Reviewer SCORE SUMMARY. Extent of Need 25 Goals Objectives and Milestones

Global Insurance CFO Survey 2014

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR INDIVIDUAL CONTRACT

Budget Process and Details

Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada. Internal Audit Report. Audit of the Income Assistance Program. Prepared by:

Managing Grid Infrastructure. Kevin Dasso VP, Electric Asset Management Overview

Alexander Hamilton Best Practices Summit. USAA Enterprise Risk Management

NYISO Capital Budgeting Process. Draft 01/13/03

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED

CITY OF VILLA PARK The Hidden Jewel

Office of the Provost University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. 3 February 2016

Central Connecticut State University Integrated Budget Model. Pilot Department Overview and Training Session

A Roadmap: Impact Evaluation to Development Impact (i2i)

Portfolio Management Package Insights A quarterly briefing with best practices and thought leadership concepts from your Portfolio Management Package

Proposed FY FSRA Priorities and Budget

Financing for Energy & Sustainability

Project Integration Management

CECL Financial Statement Disclosures What s Changing?

OVERVIEW OF CONVERGENCE BLENDED FINANCE INFORMATION SESSION & NETWORKING BREAKFAST ZÜRICH, 28 TH AUGUST, 2018

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF WINDSOR POLICY

PROJECT AND PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT - NUCLEAR

Making Predictive Modeling Work for Small Commercial Insurance Risk Assessment

1. Nokia Business System 2. Financial Metrics and Targets 3. Capital Structure and Capital Allocation

Helping Asset Management Firms in Hong Kong Face Regulatory and Operational Challenges

DSRIP Funds Flow Distribution Process Review of Model Framework

Intro Public-Private Partnership (P3) Finance Course

Board Meeting Handout. Technical Corrections and Improvements July 30, 2014

ROADMAP TO INFRASTRUCTURE AS AN ASSET CLASS

Audit of Regional Operations Manitoba Region

Management. Highlights in 2013 MANAGEMENT 63

The UNOPS Budget Estimates, Executive Board September 2013

Aligning Marketing and Finance with Generally Accepted Standards for Valuing Brands: Opportunities and Obstacles

Report. by the Comptroller and Auditor General. HM Treasury. Spending Review 2015

ROI CASE STUDY SPSS INFINITY PROPERTY & CASUALTY

Making the most of GRESB Real Estate

Successfully navigating the journey to pooling

Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) - Enterprise-wide Risk Management (ERM)

Year end report (2016 activities, related expected results and objectives)

Strategic Plan Foundation to Transformation

Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals in the Era of the Addis Ababa Action Agenda

Actuarial Transformation The Future Actuary

DEEP DIVES ON THE USE OF IMPACT DATA THROUGHOUT THE INVESTMENT PROCESS

Q Quarterly Report

A NON-MARKET STRATEGY FOR ACCELERATING DEVELOPMENT IN PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE IN SOUTH AFRICA: A PROJECT FINANCE APPROACH

Scientific Council Forty-sixth Session 07/12/2009. KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (KPIs) FOR THE AGENCY

Challenges of implementation. a regulatory perspective

January 4, Re: ANNA DSB Product Committee Consultation Paper Phase 1 Final. Dear Sir or Madam:

In-force portfolios are a valuable but often neglected asset that

Society of Actuaries Action Report Presented to. Actuaries Club of the Southwest Bob Beuerlein, SOA President

PFS INGREDIENTS FOR SUCCESS

Second-Party Opinion EUROFIMA Green Bond

Patent Quality Metrics for Fiscal Year 2017 and Request for Comments on. AGENCY: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce.

Energize Your Enterprise Risk Management

Stormwater System Asset Management Plan. June 2018

Managing tax administration reforms

Freshwater Fish Marketing Corporation. Five-Year Corporate Plan Summary

Rulemaking implementing the Exchange provisions, summarized in a separate HPA document.

Quick Reference Card PPM Pro Project Data Field Dictionary

National IT Project Management Methodology. IT Project Steering Committee Support Guide

Keeping Score: Best Practices for Risk Management Reporting

The Big Business of Small Enterprises

Business Plan

Introduction. The Assessment consists of: Evaluation questions that assess best practices. A rating system to rank your board s current practices.

November 10, 2014 Undertaking # 6 Transcript Page 426

Policy Proposals for Reducing Health Care Costs. Marc Boutin, JD Chief Executive Officer

Transcription:

Loss Prevention Strategy & Framework for Manitoba Public Insurance May Version:. Date Revised: May, Document Name: MAIN_MPI Loss Prevention Strategy and Framework.docx Page

0 Executive Summary Manitoba Public Insurance has historically engaged in a range of loss prevention and reduction activities that independently, carry the objective to reduce the number and/or the cost of claims to the Corporation. These programs vary in their structure, management and contribution to the overall return on investment to the loss prevention portfolio. A Loss Prevention Strategy and Framework brings all elements of loss prevention in scope, manages the program design from ideation to development and launch using a standard approach, establishes the governance framework to manage the programs through their lifecycle, enables collective tracking, and recognizes that these elements all work together, contributing in different but complementary ways toward the overall goal of loss prevention, reduced claims, and lower claims costs that ultimately benefit ratepayers in the form of lower insurance premiums. To support the development of the MPI loss prevention strategy and framework, MPI asked IBM to develop a leading practices based framework for managing and evaluating MPIs loss prevention programs. Specifically, the project objectives included leveraging IBMs knowledge, expertise and leading practices to: Assist MPI in the identification of all applicable loss prevention programs Develop and propose a Loss Prevention Governance Framework Develop a governance structure based on leading practices for go forward implementation Develop monitoring and evaluation framework through which key performance indicators can be developed, tracked and reported upon Develop a reporting framework (or scorecard) through which performance indicators from each program can be rolled up to produce an overall ROI measure for the entire loss prevention portfolio A high level assessment of MPIs current loss prevention capabilities revealed a number of strengths and weaknesses. Strengths Comprehensive: MPI has leveraged its role as a public insurer and as administrator of DVA to develop and deploy a large number of initiatives that contribute to its loss prevention efforts. From an individual program perspective, MPIs loss prevention efforts can be viewed as one of the more comprehensive in the auto insurance industry with a broad set of programs covering various aspects of loss prevention Page

Availability of Data: Due to its mandate of providing licensing and vehicle registration services, MPI has access to information that is not easily available to private insurers which it can use to design programs that are more effective in producing the desired loss prevention outcomes 0 Pockets of Excellence: There are pockets of excellence for program design, management and governance (e.g. Road Safety Programming, Value Management Business Case process etc.) within MPI; however an overarching framework is missing Weaknesses Unclear loss prevention objectives: The corporate mission to serve the ratepayer on Loss Prevention is not well understood. Additionally, some of the business units have never been asked to account for their performance on loss prevention metric. Lack of loss prevention management governance: Since most of the current loss prevention programming was designed for serving different corporate priorities, there is no clear and consistent process for ideation and new program development. The current governance structure to ensure that programs are appropriately reviewed, assessed, and managed lacks maturity. There is a lack of ownership and accountability for results, once an initiative is launched. Inconsistent Measurement: There is a lack of a uniform approach to identifying, qualifying and measuring impact by initiative. Some business units measure their performance to a service standard (rather than the inherent loss prevention opportunity). Data Access and Maturity: MPI lacks the ability to easily access and apply MPIs unique line of sight opportunity: data from claims, licensing, registration, inspections, etc. Further there are opportunities to develop big data and advanced analytics based capabilities. As a pre requisite to developing the loss prevention strategy and framework, IBM developed a core definition of loss prevention based on MPIs mandate, founding principles, and corporate strategic goals. Loss prevention at MPI is defined as: The Loss Prevention initiatives undertaken by MPI seek to identify and implement programs to address the primary drivers of claims and claim costs with the intention of reducing the social and financial impact to ratepayers Page

0 IBM recommends a stage gate process to ensure each loss prevention program in the portfolio focuses on objectives that generate the most value. The key features of the new process include: Developing a solution brief document that details the loss issue being targeted, size of the issue, recommended solution, estimated cost of development and operations, benefits expected and other considerations. The process links with the MPI Value Management Business Case process to drive standardization across the enterprise. Program prioritization to ensure that the available resources (financial, workforce etc.) are effectively allocated across all programs based on a pre defined scoring criteria that is defined from the overall corporate strategy. Ensuring all aspects of the program design are covered through the feasibility assessment including changes to current operations to include new monitoring and evaluation mechanisms where applicable. To manage the loss prevention portfolio and the new process, several recommendations have also been made. This includes adding two new governance committees to the existing MPI governance structure: Loss Prevention Internal Working Committee: Owns the MPI Loss Prevention portfolio at MPI setting the direction and evaluating the submissions from each Business Unit. External Stakeholder Committee on Loss Prevention: Maintains the formal relationship with external stakeholders to obtain support for MPI Loss Prevention program delivery and jointly discuss opportunities for new programs. Additionally, roles and responsibilities of various stakeholders required to support the process through the various lifecycle stages have been clearly defined. A portfolio evaluation framework has been designed. The evaluation framework links each programs objectives with the outcome indicators and the related measurements and data points. Additionally the benefit realization timeline and frequency of reporting is also required to be developed and reported. Outcomes are collected from each program (loss prevention or loss payment reduction) and rolled up to define the loss prevention portfolios scorecard. Page

In order to successfully implement the loss prevention framework, there are three foundational efforts that MPI needs to undertake in parallel. Change Management and Communication: 0 In many instances, this framework will represent a change in how current and future programs are designed, managed, perceived and evaluated to ensure alignment with the MPI loss prevention program vision and objectives. Conduct a change management program including communication and training for MPI internal stakeholders to help them adjust to the new process, governance and evaluation standards within MPI. Communicate Loss Prevention intent and objectives with external stakeholders to obtain support required to implement the process, governance and evaluation frameworks. Data Collection, Measurement and Evaluation Data and measurements recommended here may not currently exist in MPI. Conduct a deep dive into available data points and sources (including internal, external sources, paper and electronic formats) to identify gaps between current data available and required data. Develop the program evaluation reporting using the available data and plan for collection and monitoring for data points that are not currently available within MPI Develop the capability to link the data and present it in a form that can be easily managed for various data analysis and reporting. Baseline and Reporting Complete the solution brief for all current and future Loss Prevention programs to clearly develop the program objectives, baseline current performance and develop targets for improvement including associate business case and roadmap for implementation. Page