Nation s Uninsured Rate for Children Drops to Another Historic Low in 2016

Similar documents
Kentucky , ,349 55,446 95,337 91,006 2,427 1, ,349, ,306,236 5,176,360 2,867,000 1,462

State Individual Income Taxes: Personal Exemptions/Credits, 2011

Income from U.S. Government Obligations

Annual Costs Cost of Care. Home Health Care

Union Members in New York and New Jersey 2018

Checkpoint Payroll Sources All Payroll Sources

The Effect of the Federal Cigarette Tax Increase on State Revenue

Undocumented Immigrants are:

Federal Rates and Limits

Residual Income Requirements

Pay Frequency and Final Pay Provisions

MEDICAID BUY-IN PROGRAMS

State Corporate Income Tax Collections Decline Sharply

The table below reflects state minimum wages in effect for 2014, as well as future increases. State Wage Tied to Federal Minimum Wage *

AIG Benefit Solutions Producer Licensing and Appointment Requirements by State

Termination Final Pay Requirements

Sales Tax Return Filing Thresholds by State

State Income Tax Tables

Impacts of Prepayment Penalties and Balloon Loans on Foreclosure Starts, in Selected States: Supplemental Tables

EBRI Databook on Employee Benefits Chapter 6: Employment-Based Retirement Plan Participation

Q Homeowner Confidence Survey Results. May 20, 2010

The Costs and Benefits of Half a Loaf: The Economic Effects of Recent Regulation of Debit Card Interchange Fees. Robert J. Shapiro

Federal Registry. NMLS Federal Registry Quarterly Report Quarter I

MINIMUM WAGE WORKERS IN HAWAII 2013

How Much Would a State Earned Income Tax Credit Cost in Fiscal Year 2018?

Motor Vehicle Sales/Use, Tax Reciprocity and Rate Chart-2005

Uninsured Children : Charting the Nation s Progress

Table 1: Medicaid and CHIP: March and April 2017 Preliminary Monthly Enrollment

Aiming. Higher. Results from a Scorecard on State Health System Performance 2015 Edition. Douglas McCarthy, David C. Radley, and Susan L.

Required Training Completion Date. Asset Protection Reciprocity

Ability-to-Repay Statutes

Table 1: Medicaid and CHIP: June and July 2017 Preliminary Monthly Enrollment

NOTICE TO MEMBERS CANADIAN DERIVATIVES CORPORATION CANADIENNE DE. Trading by U.S. Residents

Table 1: Medicaid and CHIP: December 2016 and January 2017 Preliminary Monthly Enrollment

Understanding Oregon s Throwback Rule for Apportioning Corporate Income

ATHENE Performance Elite Series of Fixed Index Annuities

By: Adelle Simmons and Laura Skopec ASPE

Budget Uncertainty in Medicaid. Federal Funds Information for States

medicaid a n d t h e How will the Medicaid Expansion for Adults Impact Eligibility and Coverage? Key Findings in Brief

Fingerprint, Biographical Affidavit and Third-Party Verification Reports Requirements

Forecasting State and Local Government Spending: Model Re-estimation. January Equation

2012 RUN Powered by ADP Tax Changes

DATA AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2010

Nation s Progress on Children s Health Coverage Reverses Course

Medicaid & CHIP: December 2014 Monthly Applications, Eligibility Determinations and Enrollment Report February 23, 2015

Q309 NATIONAL DELINQUENCY SURVEY FROM THE MORTGAGE BANKERS ASSOCIATION. Data as of September 30, 2009

DSH Reduction Allocation Process Flows. DRAFT Based on 5/15/13 NPRM

MINIMUM WAGE WORKERS IN TEXAS 2016

PAY STATEMENT REQUIREMENTS

Medicaid & CHIP: October 2014 Monthly Applications, Eligibility Determinations and Enrollment Report December 18, 2014

Insurer Participation on ACA Marketplaces,

Q209 NATIONAL DELINQUENCY SURVEY FROM THE MORTGAGE BANKERS ASSOCIATION. Data as of June 30, 2009

Media Alert. First American CoreLogic Releases Q3 Negative Equity Data

FAPRI Analysis of Dairy Policy Options for the 2002 Farm Bill Conference

Child Care Assistance Spending and Participation in 2016

Recourse for Employees Misclassified as Independent Contractors Department for Professional Employees, AFL-CIO

Fingerprint and Biographical Affidavit Requirements

CAPITOL research. States Face Medicaid Match Loss After Recovery Act Expires. health

Mapping the geography of retirement savings

TA X FACTS NORTHERN FUNDS 2O17

A d j u s t e r C r e d i t C E I n f o r m a t i o n S T A T E. DRI Will Submit Credit For You To Your State Agency. (hours ethics included)

STATE AND FEDERAL MINIMUM WAGES

Providing Subprime Consumers with Access to Credit: Helpful or Harmful? James R. Barth Auburn University

2014 STATE AND FEDERAL MINIMUM WAGES HR COMPLIANCE CENTER

Children s Health Insurance Coverage in the United States from

STATE MINIMUM WAGES 2017 MINIMUM WAGE BY STATE

The 2017 CHP Salary Survey

UPDATED BRIEF WITH 2016 DATA

Aetna Individual Direct Pay Commissions Schedule

DFA INVESTMENT DIMENSIONS GROUP INC. DIMENSIONAL INVESTMENT GROUP INC. Institutional Class Shares January 2018

Health Insurance Coverage among Puerto Ricans in the U.S.,

Chapter D State and Local Governments

State Tax Treatment of Social Security, Pension Income

Minimum Wage Laws in the States - April 3, 2006

Estimating the Number of People in Poverty for the Program Access Index: The American Community Survey vs. the Current Population Survey.

S T A T E INSURANCE COVERAGE AND PRACTICE SYMPOSIUM DECEMBER 7 8, 2017 NEW YORK, NY. DRI Will Submit Credit For You To Your State Agency

# of Credit Unions As of March 31, 2011

White Paper 2018 STATE AND FEDERAL MINIMUM WAGES

FHA Manual Underwriting Exceeding 31% / 43% DTI Eligibility Quick Reference

36 Million Without Health Insurance in 2014; Decreases in Uninsurance Between 2013 and 2014 Varied by State

Virginia Has Improved The Tax Treatment of Low-Income Families, And an EITC Modeled on The Federal EITC Would Go Further.

8, ADP,

S T A T E TURNING THE TABLES ON PLAINTIFFS IN TRUCKING LITIGATION APRIL 26 27, 2018 CHICAGO, IL. DRI Will Submit Credit For You To Your State Agency

State-Level Trends in Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance

SECTION 109 HOST STATE LOAN-TO-DEPOSIT RATIOS. The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance

A d j u s t e r C r e d i t C E I n f o r m a t i o n S T A T E. DRI Will Submit Credit For You To Your State Agency. (hours ethics included)

April 20, and More After That, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, March 27, First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002

A d j u s t e r C r e d i t C E I n f o r m a t i o n S T A T E. Pending. DRI Will Submit Credit For You To Your State Agency.

Medicaid & CHIP: March 2015 Monthly Applications, Eligibility Determinations and Enrollment Report June 4, 2015

A d j u s t e r C r e d i t C E I n f o r m a t i o n S T A T E. DRI Will Submit Credit For You To Your State Agency. (hours ethics included)

State Social Security Income Pension Income State computation not based on federal. Social Security benefits excluded from taxable income.

2019 Summary of Benefits

Summary of Benefits. Express Scripts Medicare. Value Choice S5660 & S5983. January 1, 2016 December 31, 2016

THE HOME ENERGY AFFORDABILITY GAP 2017

10 yrs. The benefit is capped at 80% of FAS. An elected official may. 2% (first 10 yrs.); or 2.25% (second 10 yrs.); or 2.5% over 20 yrs.

An Introduction to the American Community Survey Health Insurance Coverage Estimates

THE STATE OF THE STATES IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES

Table 15 Premium, Enrollment Fee, and Cost Sharing Requirements for Children, January 2017

IMPORTANT TAX INFORMATION

CHAPTER 6. The Economic Contribution of Hospitals

Transcription:

Nation s Rate for Children Drops to Another Historic Low in 2016 by Joan Alker and Olivia Pham The number of uninsured children nationwide dropped to another historic low in 2016 with approximately 250,000 children gaining coverage that year, according to newly available data from the U.S. Census Bureau. Nationally, 95.5 percent of children had health insurance in 2016, up from 95.2 percent in 2015, a significant improvement. As the figure on page 2 shows, the uninsured rate has been cut by nearly half since 2009. The progress was widespread across the nation with 16 states seeing a decline in the rate of uninsured children from 2015 to 2016, 34 states holding steady, and only the District of Columbia seeing an increase in the rate of uninsured children. (See Appendix Table 2.) Twenty-seven states had uninsured rates for children lower than the national average of percent and 12 states had rates significantly higher than the national average. The six states with the highest rates of uninsured children in 2016 were Alaska, Texas, Wyoming, North Dakota, Oklahoma, and Arizona ranging from 10 percent to 7.3 percent. (See Appendix Table 2.) The states with the greatest number of uninsured children are Texas, California, Florida, Georgia, and Arizona. (See Appendix Table 1.) 12 s Had Higher Rates for Children than the National Rate 2.5 3.3 4.7 6.8 5.8 2.9 7.3 10.0 4.7 7.8 3.4 3.5 8.8 2.5 5.0 2.4 4.0 4.3 7.3 5.3 3.6 9.2 3.0 2.2 3.6 5.9 3.2 3.5 2.9 2.4 6.5 4.4 2.1 4.8 4.0 6.2 1.62.6 4.6 2.4 0.9 1.9 2.8 3.5 3.3 3.1 3.1 rate lower than national rate (27 states including DC) No statistically significant difference from the national average (12 states) rate higher than national rate (12 states) CCF.GEORGETOWN.EDU uninsured rate for children at new low 1

Trends Since Implementation of the Affordable Care Act Further analysis of the data finds that since the implementation of the major provisions of the Affordable Care Act in 2014, almost 2 million children have gained health insurance. This represents a 37 percent decline in the number of uninsured children. (See Appendix Table 3.) The sharp improvement in children s coverage is a result of more children enrolling in Medicaid and the Children s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) and to a lesser extent new coverage offered through the federal and state-based ACA Marketplace. The Affordable Care Act required states to maintain their income eligibility levels steady for children in Medicaid and CHIP during the examined period. The vast majority of states (44) have seen significant improvements in their child health coverage rates since 2013. Only one state, Wyoming, has seen its child uninsured rate go up since implementation of the ACA. Five states Alaska, Hawaii, Maine, Nebraska and North Dakota and the District of Columbia have seen no statistically significant change. (See Appendix Table 4.) s with the sharpest decline in their rate of uninsured children during the ACA implementation period (from 2013 to 2016) include Nevada, Montana, Florida, Arizona, California, Idaho, and Colorado. (See Appendix Table 4.) Rate of Children, 2009-2016 8.6%* 8.0%* 7.5%* 7.2%* 7.1% 6.0%* 4.8%* %* 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 * Change is significant at the 90% confidence level. 2013 was the only year that did not show a significant one-year decline in the national rate of uninsured children. Conclusion The share of children covered by employer-sponsored insurance has remained largely unchanged over the threeyear period, while all forms of public coverage have had increases in enrollment among children. The nation continues to make considerable progress in reducing the number of uninsured children, which reached a historic low in 2016. This progress is largely due to enrollment in Medicaid and CHIP. 2 uninsured rate for children at new low CCF.GEORGETOWN.EDU

Methodology Data Source This brief analyzes single-year estimates of summary data from the 2008 to 2016 American Community Survey (ACS). The U.S. Census Bureau publishes ACS summary data on American Fact Finder. Where only number estimates are available, percent estimates and their standard errors were computed based on formulas provided in the 2016 ACS s Instructions for Applying Statistical Testing to ACS 1-Year Data. Margin of Error The published Census Bureau data provide a 90 percent margin of error (potential error bounds for any given data point). Except where noted, reported differences of rate or number estimates (either between groups, coverage sources, or years) are statistically significant within a 90 percent margin of error. Georgetown CCF does not take the 90 percent margin of error into account when ranking states by the number and percent of uninsured children by state. Minor differences in state rankings may not be statistically significant. Percent Change Percent change measures differences relative to the size of what is being measured. Percent change is useful in assessing a state s progress in reducing its population of uninsured children by comparing the decline to the size of the population at the starting point. In this report, percent change refers to change in uninsured children from 2013 to 2016, or 2015 to 2016, compared to the original population of uninsured children in 2013 and 2015, respectively. Health Coverage Data on sources of health insurance coverage are point-intime estimates that convey whether a person has coverage at the time of the survey. Individuals can report more than one source of coverage, so such totals may add to more than 100 percent. Additionally, the estimates are not adjusted to address the Medicaid undercount often found in surveys, which may be accentuated by the absence of state-specific health insurance program names in the ACS. We report children covered by Medicare, TRICARE/ military, VA, or two or more types of health insurance as being covered by an other source of health coverage. The Census Bureau provides the following categories of coverage for respondents to indicate source of health insurance: current or former employer, purchased directly from an insurance company, Medicare, Medicaid or meanstested (includes CHIP), TRICARE or other military health coverage, VA, Indian Health Service (IHS), or other. People who indicate IHS as their only source of health coverage do not have comprehensive coverage and are considered to be uninsured. Demographic Characteristics Children are defined as those under the age of 18. Geographic Location We report regional data for the U.S. as defined by the Census Bureau. The ACS produces single-year estimates for all geographic areas with a population of 65,000 or more, which includes all regions, states (including DC), and county and county equivalents. CCF.GEORGETOWN.EDU uninsured rate for children at new low 3

Appendix Table 1. Change in the Number of Children, 2015 to 2016 2015 Number 2016 Number 2015-2016 Change in Number Percent Change United s 3,534,000 3,277,000-257,000 * -7.3% California 302,000 268,000-34,000 * -11.3% Florida 284,000 257,000-27,000 * -9.5% Ohio 115,000 95,000-20,000 * -17.4% Missouri 80,000 62,000-18,000 * -22.5% Arizona 134,000 119,000-15,000 * -11.2% Indiana 106,000 92,000-14,000 * -13.2% Kentucky 43,000 32,000-11,000 * -25.6% Texas 682,000 671,000-11,000-1.6% Utah 65,000 54,000-11,000 * -16.9% Arkansas 35,000 26,000-9,000 * -25.7% Tennessee 62,000 53,000-9,000-1% Iowa 26,000 18,000-8,000 * -30.8% Alabama 34,000 27,000-7,000 * -20.6% Maryland 52,000 45,000-7,000-13.5% Kansas 37,000 31,000-6,000-16.2% Louisiana 40,000 34,000-6,000-15.0% Montana 17,000 11,000-6,000 * -35.3% Idaho 25,000 20,000-5,000-20.0% Michigan 68,000 63,000-5,000-7.4% New Jersey 75,000 70,000-5,000-6.7% Connecticut 25,000 21,000-4,000-16.0% Illinois 75,000 71,000-4,000-5.3% Nevada 50,000 46,000-4,000-8.0% South Dakota 14,000 10,000-4,000 * -28.6% Georgia 166,000 163,000-3,000-1.8% Massachusetts 16,000 13,000-3,000-18.8% New York 104,000 101,000-3,000-2.9% Rhode Island 7,000 4,000-3,000 * -42.9% West Virginia 11,000 8,000-3,000 * -27.3% Maine 14,000 12,000-2,000-14.3% Oregon 31,000 29,000-2,000-6.5% Virginia 91,000 89,000-2,000-2.2% Washington 43,000 41,000-2,000-4.7% Alaska 20,000 19,000-1,000-5.0% Colorado 52,000 51,000-1,000-1.9% Nebraska 25,000 24,000-1,000-4.0% Oklahoma 71,000 70,000-1,000-1.4% Wisconsin 46,000 45,000-1,000-2.2% Delaware 6,000 6,000 0 0.0% New Hampshire 7,000 7,000 0 0.0% South Carolina 44,000 44,000 0 0.0% North Dakota 13,000 14,000 1,000 7.7% Vermont 1,000 2,000 1,000 100.0% Wyoming 11,000 12,000 1,000 9.1% District of Columbia 2,000 4,000 2,000 * 100.0% Hawaii 5,000 7,000 2,000 40.0% North Carolina 99,000 102,000 3,000 3.0% Minnesota 39,000 43,000 4,000 10.3% Mississippi 29,000 33,000 4,000 13.8% New Mexico 22,000 26,000 4,000 18.2% Pennsylvania 111,000 116,000 5,000 % * Indicates change is significant at 90% confidence level. Numbers are rounded to nearest thousand. Change in number of uninsured children may not sum to total due to rounding. See methodology for explanation of percent change. 4 uninsured rate for children at new low CCF.GEORGETOWN.EDU

Appendix Table 2. Change in the Percent of Children, 2015 to 2016 2015 Percent 2016 Percent 2015-2016 Percentage Point Change United s 4.8-0.3 * Montana 7.6 4.7-2.9 * South Dakota 6.7-2.2 * Rhode Island 3.4 1.9-1.5 * Arkansas 4.9 3.6-1.3 * Missouri 5.7-1.3 * Utah 7.2 5.8-1.3 * Idaho 5.8 4.7-1.1 Kentucky 4.2 3.2-1.1 * Maine 5.7 4.6-1.1 Arizona 8.3 7.3-1.0 * Iowa 3.5 2.5-1.0 * Indiana 6.7 5.9-0.9 * Nevada 7.6 6.8-0.8 West Virginia 2.8 2.1-0.8 Florida 6.9 6.2-0.7 * Kansas 5.1 4.3-0.7 Ohio 4.4 3.6-0.7 * Alabama 3.1 2.4-0.6 * Alaska 10.6 10.0-0.6 Louisiana 3.6 3.0-0.6 * Tennessee 4.2 3.5-0.6 * Connecticut 3.3 2.8-0.5 Maryland 3.9 3.3-0.5 California 3.3 2.9-0.4 * Nebraska 5.3 5.0-0.3 Oregon 3.6 3.3-0.3 Texas 9.5 9.2-0.3 Colorado 4.2 4.0-0.2 Georgia 6.7 6.5-0.2 Massachusetts 1.1 0.9-0.2 Michigan 3.1 2.9-0.2 New Jersey 3.7 3.5-0.2 Illinois 2.5 2.4-0.1 Oklahoma 7.4 7.3-0.1 South Carolina 4.1 4.0-0.1 Virginia 4.9 4.8-0.1 Washington 2.6 2.5-0.1 New Hampshire 2.7 2.6 0.0 New York 2.5 2.4 0.0 North Dakota 7.9 7.8 0.0 Wisconsin 3.6 3.5 0.0 Delaware 3.0 3.1 0.1 North Carolina 4.4 0.1 Pennsylvania 4.1 4.4 0.2 Minnesota 3.1 3.4 0.3 Mississippi 4.0 0.5 Vermont 1.0 1.6 0.5 Hawaii 1.6 2.2 0.6 New Mexico 5.3 0.8 Wyoming 7.8 8.8 1.0 District of Columbia 1.5 3.1 1.6 * * Indicates change is significant at 90% confidence level. Change in percent of uninsured children may not sum to total due to rounding. CCF.GEORGETOWN.EDU uninsured rate for children at new low 5

Appendix Table 3. Change in the Number of Children, 2013 to 2016 2013 Number 2016 Number 2013-2016 Change in Number Percent Change United s 5,234,000 3,277,000-1,957,000 * -37.4% California 673,000 268,000-405,000 * -60.2% Texas 888,000 671,000-217,000 * -24.4% Florida 445,000 257,000-188,000 * -42.2% Georgia 238,000 163,000-75,000 * -31.5% Arizona 192,000 119,000-73,000 * -38.0% New York 171,000 101,000-70,000 * -40.9% Illinois 125,000 71,000-54,000 * -43.2% Washington 95,000 41,000-54,000 * -56.8% Nevada 99,000 46,000-53,000 * -53.5% Colorado 102,000 51,000-51,000 * -50.0% Ohio 141,000 95,000-46,000 * -32.6% New Jersey 112,000 70,000-42,000 * -37.5% North Carolina 144,000 102,000-42,000 * -29.2% Indiana 130,000 92,000-38,000 * -29.2% Missouri 98,000 62,000-36,000 * -36.7% Tennessee 85,000 53,000-32,000 * -37.6% Pennsylvania 147,000 116,000-31,000 * -21.1% Utah 85,000 54,000-31,000 * -36.5% Louisiana 63,000 34,000-29,000 * -46.0% Minnesota 72,000 43,000-29,000 * -40.3% South Carolina 73,000 44,000-29,000 * -39.7% Kentucky 60,000 32,000-28,000 * -46.7% Michigan 90,000 63,000-27,000 * -30.0% Oklahoma 95,000 70,000-25,000 * -26.3% Mississippi 56,000 33,000-23,000 * -41.1% Alabama 48,000 27,000-21,000 * -43.8% Oregon 50,000 29,000-21,000 * -42.0% Idaho 38,000 20,000-18,000 * -47.4% New Mexico 43,000 26,000-17,000 * -39.5% Wisconsin 61,000 45,000-16,000 * -26.2% Maryland 59,000 45,000-14,000 * -23.7% Arkansas 39,000 26,000-13,000 * -33.3% Connecticut 34,000 21,000-13,000 * -38.2% Kansas 44,000 31,000-13,000 * -29.5% Iowa 30,000 18,000-12,000 * -40.0% Virginia 101,000 89,000-12,000 * -11.9% West Virginia 20,000 8,000-12,000 * -60.0% Montana 22,000 11,000-11,000 * -50.0% Massachusetts 21,000 13,000-8,000 * -38.1% Rhode Island 12,000 4,000-8,000 * -66.7% Alaska 22,000 19,000-3,000-13.6% Delaware 9,000 6,000-3,000 * -33.3% Maine 15,000 12,000-3,000 * -20.0% New Hampshire 10,000 7,000-3,000 * -30.0% South Dakota 13,000 10,000-3,000 * -23.1% Hawaii 9,000 7,000-2,000-22.2% Vermont 4,000 2,000-2,000 * -50.0% Nebraska 25,000 24,000-1,000-4.0% District of Columbia 3,000 4,000 1,000 33.3% North Dakota 13,000 14,000 1,000 7.7% Wyoming 8,000 12,000 4,000 * 50.0% * Indicates change is significant at 90% confidence level. Numbers are rounded to nearest thousand. Change in number of uninsured children may not sum to total due to rounding. See methodology for explanation of percent change. 6 uninsured rate for children at new low CCF.GEORGETOWN.EDU

Appendix Table 4. Change in the Percent of Children, 2013 to 2016 2013 Percent 2016 Percent 2013-2016 Percentage Point Change United s 7.1-2.7 * Nevada 14.9 6.8-8.1 * Montana 10.1 4.7-5.4 * Florida 11.1 6.2-4.9 * Arizona 11.9 7.3-4.6 * California 7.4 2.9-4.4 * Colorado 8.2 4.0-4.2 * Idaho 8.9 4.7-4.2 * Utah 9.5 5.8-3.7 * Rhode Island 5.4 1.9-3.5 * Texas 12.6 9.2-3.4 * Washington 5.9 2.5-3.4 * West Virginia 5.3 2.1-3.3 * New Mexico 8.5 5.3-3.2 * Georgia 9.6 6.5-3.1 * Mississippi 7.6-3.1 * South Carolina 6.7 4.0-2.8 Kentucky 5.9 3.2-2.7 * Louisiana 5.7 3.0-2.7 * Oklahoma 10.0 7.3-2.7 * Missouri 7.0-2.5 * Oregon 5.8 3.3-2.5 * Indiana 8.2 5.9-2.4 * Minnesota 5.6 3.4-2.3 * Tennessee 5.7 3.5-2.2 * New Jersey 5.6 3.5-2.0 * Alabama 4.3 2.4-1.9 * Arkansas 5.5 3.6-1.9 * North Carolina 6.3-1.9 * Kansas 6.1 4.3-1.8 * South Dakota 6.3-1.8 * Alaska 11.6 10.0-1.7 Illinois 4.2 2.4-1.7 * Ohio 5.3 3.6-1.7 * Iowa 4.1 2.5-1.6 * New York 4.0 2.4-1.6 * Vermont 3.1 1.6-1.6 * Connecticut 4.3 2.8-1.5 * Delaware 3.1-1.4 * Maine 5.9 4.6-1.4 New Hampshire 3.8 2.6-1.2 * Wisconsin 4.7 3.5-1.2 * Maryland 4.4 3.3-1.1 * Michigan 4.0 2.9-1.1 * Pennsylvania 5.4 4.4-1.1 * Hawaii 3.0 2.2-0.8 Virginia 5.4 4.8-0.7 * Massachusetts 1.5 0.9-0.6 * Nebraska 5.5 5.0-0.5 North Dakota 7.9 7.8-0.1 District of Columbia 2.4 3.1 0.7 Wyoming 5.7 8.8 3.1 * * Indicates change is significant at 90% confidence level. Change in percent of uninsured children may not sum to total due to rounding. CCF.GEORGETOWN.EDU uninsured rate for children at new low 7