Benefits of Advanced Traffic Management Solutions: Before and After Crash Analysis for Deployment of a Variable Advisory Speed Limit System

Similar documents
SafetyAnalyst: Software Tools for Safety Management of Specific Highway Sites White Paper for Module 4 Countermeasure Evaluation August 2010

Standard Tort Claim Form Packet

d t m m Standard Tort Claim. A New Law that Impacts Presenting a Standard Tort Claim Form

GENERAL GUIDELINES. Report all accidents regardless of the degree of injury or damage.

Defendant only Claim notification form(form RTA2)

APPENDIX E: ATM MODEL TECH MEMORANDUM. Metropolitan Council Parsons Brinckerhoff

developed the Washington State Tort Claim Form Packet.

Claim for Damages Form Packet

Police Agency: (Ex.: SSM Police Service, OPP, etc.)

Incorporating Climate and Extreme Weather Risk in Transportation Asset Management. Michael Meyer and Michael Flood WSP Parsons Brinckerhoff

Pierce County Fire Protection District No. 6 (PCFD6) Standard Tort Claim Form Packet.

1.8 Organisation details. Name

A New Cost-Benefit Methodology for Highway-Railway Grade Crossing Safety Programs

1.8 Organisation details. Name

1.8 Organisation details. Name

Johns Hopkins University Hop Vans. Collision Report Form

INSURANCE ACT AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE FAULT DETERMINATION REGULATIONS

Smart Contracts Use Cases in Insurance

Review and Update of Year 2035 Regional Transportation Plan

Road Accident Database

Instructions for the Claim Notification Form

Economic Appraisal Objectives

Driver s accident report kit:

Don t Let Your Fleet Fleece You! The elements of an effective fleet program

Volvo City Safety loss experience by vehicle age

An Assessment of Interstate Safety Investment Priorities in Washington State

Initial Evaluation of Crash Avoidance Technologies Using Insurance Data

H2P CAR INSURANCE MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIM FORM

KAWASAKI MOTORCYCLE INSURANCE CLAIM FORM

Tiger Sanitation, Inc US Hwy 87 E San Antonio, TX 78222

INCIDENT WITNESS STATEMENT Department of Environmental Health & Safety

DMP (Decision Making Process)

Telematics Impacts on CTP and WC Kaise Stephan Deloitte Actuaries & Consultants Limited

2010 Mazda Adaptive Front Lighting System time of day analysis

AUTO ACCIDENT INTAKE FORM

SUBJECT: TRAFFIC COLLISION INVESTIGATION

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

Austin Independent School District Police Department Policy and Procedure Manual

Insurance For Your Auto, Home, Business, Motorcycle, Boats, RV & More

final report Benefit/Cost Analysis for U.S. 41 Corridor ITS New Start - Winnebago, Outagamie, and Brown Counties

Cannabis Regs City of San Luis Obispo

Honda Accord collision avoidance features

I-44/US-75 Interchange and Related Improvements on I-44 in Tulsa County

HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA IN THE MATTER BETWEEN HARTLEY SIDNEY JOHN V THE ROAD ACCIDENT FUND

Impact of Honda Accord collision avoidance features on claim frequency by rated driver age

Standard Tort Claim Form Packet

HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (HSIP)

OREGON OFFICE OF STATE FIRE MARSHAL HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INCIDENT REPORTING PROGRAM GUIDANCE MANUAL

SOUTH CENTRAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION. Scope of Services. Terrebonne Parish

How Does Your Company Handle Distracted Driving

Strategic Plan Progress Report Goal 2 Focus. July 2015 San Francisco, California

Safe Driving at Work Procedure

SOUTHWEST TENNESSEE COMMUNITY COLLEGE

Date of loss: Time of loss: am/pm Loss Location:

CTRE EVALUATION OF THE IOWA DOT S SAFETY IMPROVEMENT CANDIDATE LIST PROCESS. CTRE Project 00-74

Traffic Control. Project Title

The Future in Transportation: Autonomous Vehicles

MOTOR ACCIDENT & THEFT CLAIM FORM

DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLE (DMV) AUTHORIZATION FORM

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS. A. Introduction

Insurance that s with you... mile after mile! PROMPT CLAIMS REPORTING A KEY TO LOWER LOSS COSTS

HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (HSIP) Greater Minnesota Solicitation for Local Projects for 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2020.

Rising Auto Costs. Casualty Actuarial Society Annual Meeting November 7, 2017

INTRODUCTION TO STATISTICAL STUDY OF BUS ACCIDENT ARE THE BUSES SAFE OR NOT?

Strategic Plan Performance Metrics & Targets

City of Los Angeles Los Angeles Fire Department. Cost of Risk Report FY 11-12

Financial Services Commission of Ontario. Analysis of Loss Trend Rates for Ontario

Driving for Work. HSA Perspective. Deirdre Sinnott Senior Inspector Work Related Vehicle Safety Program

MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT CLAIM FORM

Racial Composition. Asian alone Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone. Some other race alone. Two or more races:

Draft Environmental Impact Statement. Appendix G Economic Analysis Report

Chief of Police: Review Date: July 1

Impact Valuation of PTT Group Logistics Zero Accidents

Briefing on IIHS and HLDI

The application packet can be found at the following link:

Update Evaluation of Transport Canada s Road Safety Transfer Payments Program (RSTPP)

10-Year Capital Highway Investment Plan DRAFT

Request For Proposal. for

Future Fit Risk Engineering 2017 Global Risk Engineering Conference

Analysis of Benefits and Costs of Lane Departure Warning Systems for the Trucking Industry

Prince Edward Island

Genesee & Wyoming Railroad Services, Inc.

Newark Rotary February 14, Joe Rutherford, District Deputy Director Jerry Wray, Director John Kasich, Governor

I t has been reported that seat belts reduce fatalities and

Social cost of road crashes and injuries 2016 update. March 2017

The Social Cost of Road Crashes and Injuries 2013 update

The Next Game Changer: Predictive Analytics

TRB Paper Evaluating TxDOT S Safety Improvement Index: a Prioritization Tool

UC Irvine Environmental Health & Safety TITLE: Driver Safety Program

Social cost of road crashes and injuries 2015 update. March 2016

Multi-Vehicle Crashes Involving Large Trucks: A Random Parameter Discrete Outcome Modeling Approach

Social cost of road crashes and injuries 2017 update. December 2017

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY

1. Introduction 2. Aim & Research question 3. Method 4. Theory/Background 5. Case 6. Conclusion 7. Questions & other considerations

Motor Vehicle Claim Form

10-Year Capital Highway Investment Plan DRAFT

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS. Table 1: Total Cost Estimate (Economic Costs) (CNY million)

Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District Sheriff's Unit CRIME LOG / CLERY MEDIA BULLETIN

2014 Customer Satisfaction Survey MTA Bridges and Tunnels

Section 11. Records / Summaries. Table of Contents

Transcription:

Benefits of Advanced Traffic Management Solutions: Before and After Crash Analysis for Deployment of a Variable Advisory Speed Limit System Alex Chambers California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo July 13, 2016

Variable Advisory Speed Limit System Improve Safety

OR 217 Active Traffic Management Project Variable Advisory Speed Limit System Traveler Information System Adaptive Ramp Metering Queue Warning System Three Main Goals Improve Safety Reduce Congestion Utilize Existing Assets Objective: Evaluate the effectiveness of the Variable Advisory Speed Limit System in reducing crashes

28 overhead VSL signs 7 mainline Variable Message Signs (VMS) 6 arterial VMS 4 roadway weather sensors 5 radar traffic sensors 12 Bluetooth sensors 20 mainline dual loop stations

Crashes By Type 6% 9% 10% 4% 700 600 500 400 300 Crash Type By Injury Class n=1118 200 100 n=1118 Fixed Object Rear End Turning 71% Other Sideswipe - Overtaking 0 FATAL INJ A INJ B INJ C PDO Fixed Other Rear End Sideswipe - Overtake Turn

450 Rear End Collision Severity 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Injury PDO n=797

WCCCA TOCS TDS VSL Activation 7/22/2011 7/23/2014 Incomplete Data, No PDO Incidents 12/31/2014 4/11/2016 12/31/2015 4/7/2016

Before 36 months After 21 months Traffic Accident Injury (TAI), Traffic Accident No Injury (TAN), and Traffic Accident Unknown Injury (TAU) are the primary sources used for analysis.

0.00% 5.00% 20.00% 15.00% 10.00% 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 5 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8 7 7.2 7.4 Before After 0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00% 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 5 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8 7 7.2 7.4 Before After

Similar crash trends to the WCCCA data Reduction around north terminus No large changes at VSL locations Milepost 0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00% 0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3 3.3 3.6 Before 3.9 4.2 After 4.5 4.8 5.1 5.4 5.7 6 6.3 6.6 6.9 7.2 7.5

140000 Official OR 217 Traffic Volumes 120000 Average Annual Daily Traffic 100000 80000 60000 40000 20000 0 2011 2012 2013 2014 0.5 1.21 2.16 2.73 3.32 4.02 4.57 5.6 6.3 6.96 Milepost

Portal provides a repository of traffic data for the entire Portland area.

1800000 SB Sanitized By Station 1600000 1400000 Number of Vehicles 1200000 1000000 800000 600000 400000 200000 0 7/1/2011 9/1/2011 11/1/2011 1/1/2012 3/1/2012 5/1/2012 7/1/2012 9/1/2012 11/1/2012 1/1/2013 3/1/2013 5/1/2013 7/1/2013 9/1/2013 Month 1037 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1111 1118 11/1/2013 1/1/2014 3/1/2014 5/1/2014 7/1/2014 9/1/2014 11/1/2014 1/1/2015 3/1/2015 5/1/2015 7/1/2015 9/1/2015 11/1/2015 1/1/2016 3/1/2016

1800000 SB Sanitized Average Traffic 1600000 1400000 Number of Vehicles 1200000 1000000 800000 600000 400000 200000 0 7/1/2011 9/1/2011 11/1/2011 1/1/2012 3/1/2012 5/1/2012 7/1/2012 9/1/2012 11/1/2012 1/1/2013 3/1/2013 5/1/2013 7/1/2013 9/1/2013 11/1/2013 1/1/2014 3/1/2014 5/1/2014 7/1/2014 9/1/2014 11/1/2014 1/1/2015 3/1/2015 5/1/2015 7/1/2015 9/1/2015 11/1/2015 1/1/2016 3/1/2016 Month

3000000 2500000 Monthly Traffic Volumes 2000000 1500000 1000000 500000 0 Before NB SB After

+ 20 % 2000 + 15 % 1500 + 10 % 1000 Change in Crashes + 05 % + 0 % - 05 % TAI TAN TAU Overall 500 0-500 Number of Crashes - 10 % - 15 % - 20 % Change in Crashes Number of Before Crashes Number of After Crashes n=2894-1000 -1500-2000

600 500 After Predicted After 400 300 200 100 0 TAI TAN TAU ABV ANM ASP ATL CRMN DUI HAZ HRN INFO MOA TRF

+ 20 % 1000 + 15 % 800 600 + 10 % 400 Change in Crashes + 05 % + 0 % - 05 % TAI TAN TAU Overall 200 0-200 Number of Crashes - 10 % - 15 % - 20 % Change in Crashes Number of Before Crashes Number of After Crashes n=1374-400 -600-800 -1000

+ 20 % 1000 + 15 % 800 600 + 10 % 400 Change in Crashes + 05 % + 0 % - 05 % TAI TAN TAU Overall 200 0-200 Number of Crashes -400-10 % Change in Crashes -600-15 % - 20 % Number of Before Crashes Number of After Crashes n=1465-800 -1000

+ 120 % 1200 + 100 % 1000 + 80 % 800 + 60 % 600 Change in Crashes + 40 % + 20 % 400 200 Number of Crashes + 0 % Clear Rain Snow 0-20 % Change in Crashes -200-40 % - 60 % Number of Before Crashes Number of After Crashes n=2894-400 -600

60 50 FIX OTHER REAR SS-O TURN 40 Crashes 30 20 10 0 7/1/2011 9/1/2011 11/1/2011 1/1/2012 3/1/2012 5/1/2012 7/1/2012 9/1/2012 11/1/2012 1/1/2013 3/1/2013 5/1/2013 7/1/2013 9/1/2013 11/1/2013 Month 1/1/2014 3/1/2014 5/1/2014 7/1/2014 9/1/2014 11/1/2014 1/1/2015 3/1/2015 5/1/2015 7/1/2015 9/1/2015

+ 30 % 1000 800 + 20 % 600 + 10 % 400 Change in Crashes + 0 % - 10 % DRY WET ICE SNO UNK 200 0-200 -400 Number of Crashes - 20 % Change in Crashes Number of Before Crashes -600-800 - 30 % Number of After Crashes n=1301-1000

+ 50 % 1000 + 40 % 800 + 30 % 600 + 20 % 400 Change in Crashes + 10 % + 0 % - 10 % DARK DAWN DAY DLIT UNK DUSK 200 0-200 Number of Crashes - 20 % -400-30 % Change in Crashes -600-40 % - 50 % Number of Before Crashes Number of After Crashes n=1301-800 -1000

+ 70 % Change in Crashes Number of Before Crashes 700 + 50 % Number of After Crashes 500 Change in Crashes + 30 % + 10 % 300 100 Number of Crashes - 10 % ANGL BACK FIX HEAD NCOL OTH PED REAR SS-M SS-O TURN -100-30 % n=1301-300

+ 30 % 800 + 20 % 600 Change in Crashes + 10 % + 0 % - 10 % - 20 % - 30 % FATAL INJ A INJ B INJ C PDO FATAL + INJ A Change in Crashes Number of Before Crashes Number of After Crashes n=1301 400 200 0-200 -400-600 -800 Number of Crashes

+ 70 % 400 + 50 % 300 + 30 % 200 Change in Crashes + 10 % - 10 % FATAL INJ A INJ B INJ C FATAL + INJ A 100 0-100 Number of Crashes - 30 % Change in Crashes -200-50 % Number of Before Crashes Number of After Crashes n=1450-300 - 70 % -400

+ 80 % 400 + 60 % 300 + 40 % 200 Change in Crashes + 20 % + 0 % - 20 % FATAL INJ A INJ B INJ C FATAL + INJ A 100 0-100 Number of Crashes - 40 % Change in Crashes -200-60 % Number of Before Crashes -300-80 % Number of After Crashes n=1450-400

Change 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% WCCCA WCCCA - NB WCCCA - SB TOCS TDS TDS - Rear End TDS - New Data TDS - New TDS - Rear Data End TDS TOCS WCCCA - SB WCCCA - NB WCCCA Change 6.04% 2.80% 3.13% 9.99% 4.43% 3.99% 4.21%

250 200 Site Selected Based on Short Term Trend Regression to the Mean Reduction Perceived effectiveness 150 Expected Average Crash Frequency 100 Reduction due to Treatment 50 0 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016

Crashes 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Predicted Actual Expected

900 800 700 600 Crashes 500 400 300 200 100 0 F+I PDO Total Expected Actual

350 300 250 Crashes 200 150 100 50 0 Fatal and Injury Expected Actual

250 200 150 Crashes 100 50 0 Fatal and injury Expected Actual

Security Safety

Security User perceived improvement Safety

Security Fiasco Safety