ALL Counties. ALL Districts

Similar documents
Funding Update. House Transportation Subcommittee on Long-Term Infrastructure Planning September 10, 2015, 9:00 A.M. Capitol Extension E2.

FY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM

House Bill 20 Implementation. House Select Committee on Transportation Planning Tuesday, August 30, 2016, 1:00 P.M. Capitol Extension E2.

Texas Department of Transportation Page 1 of 42 Planning and Development of Transportation Projects

2017 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AND HB 20 IMPLEMENTATION

HB 20 Initial Report. Revenue Projections Funding Categories & Allocations Performance-Based Decision Making

2017 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AND HB 20 IMPLEMENTATION

Financial Snapshot October 2014

DRAFT UTP November Update - Funding Adjustments Summary EXHIBIT A REVISION DATE 11/7/14. (Amounts in millions) Sum $0

Technical Appendix. FDOT 2040 Revenue Forecast

GLOSSARY. At-Grade Crossing: Intersection of two roadways or a highway and a railroad at the same grade.

APPENDIX I REVENUE PROJECTION AND ASSUMPTIONS

Mobility / Other Modes Roger Nober Executive Vice President Law and Secretary BNSF Railway

FY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

PENNSYLVANIA S 2017 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM FINANCIAL GUIDANCE

INVESTMENT STRATEGIES

Financial. Snapshot An appendix to the Citizen s Guide to Transportation Funding in Missouri

FY Statewide Capital Investment Strategy... asset management, performance-based strategic direction

Appendix. G RTP Revenue Assumptions REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY

Texas Department of Transportation Page 1 of 66 Planning and Development of Transportation Projects. Proposed Preamble

Contents. Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization. Introduction S. St. Mary s Street San Antonio, Texas 78205

WASATCH FRONT REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN FINANCIAL PLAN. Technical Report 47 May 2007 DAVIS MORGAN SALT LAKE TOOELE WEBER

APPENDIX FOR THE METROPOLITAN LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN Forecast of State and Federal Revenues for Statewide and Metropolitan Plans

2017 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AND HB 20 IMPLEMENTATION

TESTIMONY. The Texas Transportation Challenge. Testimony Before the Study Commission on Transportation Financing

10-Year Capital Highway Investment Plan DRAFT

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION FUNDING, INCLUDING TEXAS CLEAR LANES AND CONGESTION RELIEF UPDATE

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BRYAN DISTRICT T I P

Chapter 6: Financial Resources

Corridors of Commerce DRAFT Scoring and Prioritization Process. Patrick Weidemann Director of Capital Planning and Programming November 1, 2017

Fiscal Year VDOT Annual Budget June 2017

Transportation Trust Fund Overview

RIDOA STATEWIDE PLANNING PROGRAM Transportation Planning

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2009 SESSION LAW HOUSE BILL 148

23 USC 601. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

JACKSONVILLE URBAN AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM AMENDMENT 1 FISCAL YEAR 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Proposition 1B and the Strategic Growth Plan

FY LEGISLATIVE APPROPRIATIONS REQUEST OVERVIEW

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD. Transportation Funding Options

Prioritization and Programming Process. NCDOT Division of Planning and Programming November 16, 2016

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION HOUSE DRH70631-LBxz-401T (1/22) Short Title: Congestion Relief/Intermodal Transport Fund.

OHIO MPO AND LARGE CITY CAPITAL PROGRAM SFY 2015 SUMMARY

Fiscal Year VDOT Annual Budget June 2011

10-Year Capital Highway Investment Plan DRAFT

QUALITY TRANSPORTATION SUMMARY

CHAPTER 5 INVESTMENT PLAN

Redbook. Department of Transportation

2017 Educational Series FUNDING

APPENDIX 5 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

OHIO MPO & LARGE CITY CAPITAL PROGRAM SFY 2017 SUMMARY

Fiscal Year VDOT Annual Budget June 2018

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. BE SAFE. C R I le Si 1ART UTP PROGRAMMING. Laredo District

SKATS FY 2018-FY 2023

1 (b) Reconstruct and rehabilitate state highways to better maintain 2 them and prevent and avoid costly future repairs; 3 (c) Support local

Chapter 5: Cost and Revenues Assumptions

FUNDING AND FINANCE FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS STATE FUNDING OPTIONS

Public Works and Development Services

APPENDIX B HIGH PRIORITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM (HPP) ( )

SFY 2018 (July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018) Annual Report

Fiscal Year Revised VDOT Annual Budget November 2014

The Oregon Department of Transportation Budget

MoDOT Dashboard. Measurements of Performance

Portal North Bridge Project Hudson County, New Jersey Core Capacity Project Development (Rating Assigned February 2017)

P.L.2016, CHAPTER 56, approved October 14, 2016 Assembly, No. 10 (Fourth Reprint)

Safety Target Meeting Summary 10/3/2017

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

32 nd Street Corridor Improvements

Measure I Strategic Plan, April 1, 2009 Glossary Administrative Committee Advance Expenditure Agreement (AEA) Advance Expenditure Process

FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

RIDOT The Ten Year Plan, Asset Management, and Innovation Moving Ahead in the 21 st Century

Chapter VIII Financial Plan

Introduction. December 2008

Estimated Financial Summary for the Highway and Bridge Construction Schedule

Review and Update of Year 2035 Regional Transportation Plan

PROGRAM FINANCING FUNDING

Technical Memorandum. Finance. Prepared for: Prepared by: In cooperation with: High Street Consulting Group

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OF GEORGIA TIA PROJECT CONCEPT REPORT

APPENDIX B TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #2 TRANSPORTATION FUNDING

Appendix E: Revenues and Cost Estimates

NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL ASSEMBLY

Table of Contents. Study Overview. Corridor Needs Analysis. Financial Strategies. Legislative Review

Intergovernmental Agreement Between Illinois Department of Transportation, DMATS Metropolitan Planning Organization and JULE Transit Provider

JULY 17, 2018 FINAL AGENDA SENIOR CITIZEN AND DISABLED RESIDENT TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE REPORT (NEXT SCHEDULED REPORT DECEMBER 2018)

Transportation Finance Overview. Presentation Contents

EXCELLENCE INNOVATION SERVICE VALUE

FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Chapter 4: Regional Transportation Finance

INVESTING STRATEGICALLY

VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION. FY2016 Budget. Sue Minter, Secretary of Transportation House Transportation Committee

Georgia Department of Audits and Accounts Performance Audit Division

Chapter 15. Transportation Improvements Financing. Ohio Kentucky Indiana Regional Council of Governments Regional Transportation Plan

TXDOT CONGESTION RELIEF INITIATIVE, INCLUDING

2035 Long Range Transportation Plan Update

Financial Analysis Working Paper 1 Existing Funding Sources Draft: April 2007

Florida Department of Transportation INITIAL TRANSPORTATION ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN

Appendix L Camino Real Regional Mobility Authority Tolling Policies and Road Use

FY 2011 Continuing Appropriations Act. TIGER Discretionary Grant Program

FY February Quarterly Revision. Bryan DISTRICT

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. TxDOT has a Plan STRATEGIC PLAN FOR

Transcription:

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ALL Counties rhnute ORDER Page of ALL Districts The Texas Transportation Commission (commission) finds it necessary to propose amendments to. and., relating to Transportation Funding, and to be codified under Title, Texas Administrative Code, Part. The preamble and the proposed amendments, attached to this minute order as Exhibits A and B, are incorporated by reference as though set forth verbatim in this minute order, except that they are subject to technical corrections and revisions, approved by the general counsel, necessary for compliance with state or federal law or for acceptance by the Secretary of State for filing and publication in the Texas Register. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED by the commission that the amendments to. and. are proposed for adoption and are authorized for publication in the Texas Register for the purpose of receiving public comments. The executive director is directed to take the necessary steps to implement the actions as ordered in this minute order, pursuant to the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act, Government Code, Chapter 00. Submitted and reviewed by: Di ector, Transportation Planning and Programming Division Minute Number Date Passed

Texas Department of Transportation Page of Proposed Preamble The Texas Department of Transportation (department) proposes amendments to. and., concerning Transportation Funding. 0 EXPLANATION OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS The Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) was created by the Moving Ahead for Progress in the st Century Act (also known as MAP-). The TAP provides federal funding for a variety of alternative transportation projects, many of which were previously eligible for funding under separate programs. The TAP is contained in Title, United States Code,. The amendments to., Funding Categories, and., Transportation Allocation Funding Formulas, are necessary to implement the TAP as authorized by federal law. The TAP replaces the Transportation Enhancement Program, which is currently referenced in the amended sections. 0 Amendments to., Funding Categories, remove the reference to the Safe Routes to School Program from Category, since funding for eligible projects under that program is now available through the TAP. In addition, the title and description of Category has been revised to reference the TAP, as contained in Chapter, Subchapter F, of the department s OGC: //0 : PM Exhibit A

Texas Department of Transportation Page of administrative rules. 0 0 Amendments to., Transportation Allocation Funding Formulas, clarify the new funding distributions applicable to the TAP. Specifically, the formula allocation for Category in subsection (a)() has been revised to provide that a portion of the funds will be allocated to metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) serving urbanized areas with populations over 00,000 based on their relative share of population, unless the Federal Highway Administration approves a joint request from the department and the MPO to use other factors in determining the allocation. In addition, the non-formula allocation for Category in subsection (c)() has been revised to provide that of the remaining funds in the category, a portion will be allocated to certain areas of the state, based on their relative share of population, and a portion may be allocated in any area of the state or transferred to other eligible federal programs as authorized by law. This funding methodology is consistent with the provisions of MAP- and associated federal guidelines concerning the TAP. In addition, other eligible entity has been added in subsection (c) to the list of entities that may receive funding, since that terminology is used in federal law. FISCAL NOTE James Bass, Chief Financial Officer, has determined that for OGC: //0 : PM Exhibit A

Texas Department of Transportation Page of each of the first five years in which the amendments as proposed are in effect, there will be no fiscal implications for state or local governments as a result of enforcing or administering the amendments. James Koch, Director, Transportation Planning and Programming Division, has certified that there will be no significant impact on local economies or overall employment as a result of enforcing or administering the amendments. 0 PUBLIC BENEFIT AND COST Mr. Koch has also determined that for each year of the first five years in which the sections are in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing or administering the amendments will be clarity in the methodology by which funding will be allocated through the department s Unified Transportation Program. There are no anticipated economic costs for persons required to comply with the sections as proposed. There will be no adverse economic effect on small businesses 0 SUBMITTAL OF COMMENTS Written comments on the proposed amendments to. and. may be submitted to Rule Comments, Office of General Counsel, Texas Department of Transportation, East th Street, Austin, Texas 0- or to RuleComments@txdot.gov OGC: //0 : PM Exhibit A

Texas Department of Transportation Page of with the subject line "Transportation Funding." The deadline for receipt of comments is :00 p.m. on August, 0. In accordance with Transportation Code, 0.(a)(), a person who submits comments must disclose, in writing with the comments, whether the person does business with the department, may benefit monetarily from the proposed amendments, or is an employee of the department. 0 STATUTORY AUTHORITY The amendments are proposed under Transportation Code, 0.0, which provides the Texas Transportation Commission (commission) with the authority to establish rules for the conduct of the work of the department, and more specifically, Transportation Code, 0., which requires the commission to adopt rules that define program funding categories, and Transportation Code, 0., which requires the commission to specify the formulas for allocating funds by rule. 0 CROSS REFERENCE TO STATUTE Transportation Code, Chapter 0, Subchapter P. Title, United States Code,. OGC: //0 : PM Exhibit A

Texas Department of Transportation Page of 0 0 SUBCHAPTER D. TRANSPORTATION FUNDING.. Funding Categories. (a) Highway program funding categories. The ten-year unified transportation program (UTP) described in.0 of this chapter (relating to Unified Transportation Program (UTP)) will contain the following program funding categories for highway related projects: () Category Preventive Maintenance and Rehabilitation - preventive maintenance and rehabilitation on the existing state highway system, including: (A) Preventive maintenance - minor roadway modifications to improve operations and safety; and (B) Rehabilitation - installation, rehabilitation, replacement, and maintenance of pavement, bridges, traffic control devices, traffic management systems, and ancillary traffic devices; () Category Metropolitan and Urban Corridor Projects - mobility and added capacity projects along a corridor that improve transportation facilities in order to decrease travel time and the level or duration of traffic congestion, and to increase the safe and efficient movement of people and freight in metropolitan and urbanized areas; () Category Non-Traditionally Funded Transportation OGC: 0/0/0 :0 PM

Texas Department of Transportation Page of 0 0 Projects - transportation related projects that qualify for funding from sources not traditionally part of the state highway fund including state bond financing under programs such as Proposition (General Obligation Bonds), Texas Mobility Fund, pass-through toll financing, unique federal funding, regional toll revenue, and local participation funding; () Category Statewide Connectivity Corridor Projects - mobility and added capacity projects on major state highway system corridors which provide statewide connectivity between urban areas and corridors, to create a highway connectivity network composed of the Texas Highway Trunk System, National Highway System, and connections from those two systems to major ports of entry on international borders and Texas water ports; () Category Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement - congestion mitigation and air quality improvement area projects to address attainment of a national ambient air quality standard in the nonattainment areas of the state; () Category Structures Replacement and Rehabilitation - replacement and rehabilitation of deficient existing bridges located on the public highways, roads, and streets in the state, construction of grade separations at existing highway-railroad grade crossings, and rehabilitation of deficient railroad underpasses on the state highway system; OGC: 0/0/0 :0 PM

Texas Department of Transportation Page of 0 0 () Category Metropolitan Mobility and Rehabilitation (TMA) - transportation needs within the boundaries of designated metropolitan planning areas of metropolitan planning organizations located in a transportation management area; () Category Safety - safety related projects both on and off the state highway system including the federal Highway Safety Improvement Program, Railway-Highway Crossing Program, Safety Bond Program, [Safe Routes To School Program,] and High Risk Rural Roads Program; () Category Transportation Alternatives [Enhancement] - transportation related activities as described in Chapter, Subchapter F, of this title (relating to the Transportation Alternatives Program);[projects, including:] [(A) categories outlined in federal law; and] [(B) building new safety rest areas and visitor centers along the state highway system;] (0) Category 0 Supplemental - transportation related projects that do not qualify for funding in other categories, including landscape and aesthetic improvement, erosion control and environmental mitigation, construction and rehabilitation of roadways within or adjacent to state parks, fish hatcheries, and similar facilities, replacement of railroad crossing surfaces, maintenance of OGC: 0/0/0 :0 PM

Texas Department of Transportation Page of 0 0 railroad signals, construction or replacement of curb ramps for accessibility to pedestrians with disabilities, and miscellaneous federal programs; () Category District Discretionary - projects eligible for federal or state funding selected at the district engineer's discretion; and () Category Strategic Priority - projects with specific importance to the state including those that generally promote economic opportunity, increase efficiency on military deployment routes or to retain military assets in response to the federal military base realignment and closure reports, and maintain the ability to respond to both man-made and natural emergencies. (b) Program funding categories for other modes of transportation and transportation infrastructure. The UTP will contain the following program funding categories for aviation, public transportation, rail, and the state's waterways and coastal waters projects: () Aviation Capital Improvement Program - projects based on the anticipated funding levels of the Federal Aviation Administration Airport Improvement Program and the Texas Aviation Facilities Development Program for general aviation airport development in Texas; OGC: 0/0/0 :0 PM

Texas Department of Transportation Page of 0 () Public transportation projects based on the anticipated funding levels for public transportation including fixed route city bus service, rural demand response service, special transit service for elderly and persons with disabilities, and intercity bus service from city to city; () Rail - rail related projects including light rail, freight rail, passenger rail, and high-speed rail; and () State waterways and coastal waters - water related projects including lands, easements, and rights of way for the widening, deepening, and expansion of the main channel of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway (GIWW), including beneficial use projects of dredged material, and other maritime related projects. (c) Determination of funding allocations. The commission will determine, subject to the mandates of state and federal law and specific requirements contained in other chapters of this title for programs and projects described in subsection (b) of this section, the amount of funds to be allocated to each program funding category for the appropriate period of time. 0.. Transportation Allocation Funding Formulas. (a) Formula allocations. The commission will, subject to the mandates of state and federal law, allocate funds from OGC: 0/0/0 :0 PM

Texas Department of Transportation Page of 0 0 program funding Categories,,,,,, and, as described in. of this subchapter (relating to Funding Categories), to the districts and metropolitan planning organizations (MPO) as follows: () Category Preventive Maintenance and Rehabilitation - will be allocated to all districts as an allocation program according to the following formulas: (A) Preventive maintenance. (i) Ninety-eight percent for roadway maintenance with percent based on on-system lane miles, and percent based on the pavement distress score Pace factor; and (ii) Two percent for bridge maintenance based on square footage of on-system span bridge deck area; (B) Rehabilitation. Thirty-two and one half percent based on three-year average lane miles of pavement distress scores less than 0, 0 percent based on on-system vehicle miles traveled per lane mile,. percent based on equivalent single axle load miles for on-system, off-system, and interstate, and percent based on the pavement distress score Pace factor; () Category Metropolitan and Urban Corridor Projects - will be allocated to MPOs for specific projects in the following manner: (A) percent to MPOs operating in areas that are OGC: 0/0/0 :0 PM

Texas Department of Transportation Page of 0 0 transportation management areas, according to the following formula: 0 percent based on total vehicle miles traveled on and off the state highway system, percent based on estimated population within the boundaries of the metropolitan planning area using data derived from the most recent census provided by the U.S. Bureau of the Census (census population), 0 percent based on lane miles on-system, percent based on truck vehicle miles traveled on-system, percent based on percentage of census population below the federal poverty level, percent based on congestion, and percent based on fatal and incapacitating vehicle crashes; (B) percent to MPOs operating in areas that are not transportation management areas, according to the following formula: 0 percent based on total vehicle miles traveled on and off the state highway system, percent based on estimated population within the boundaries of the metropolitan planning area using data derived from the most recent census provided by the U.S. Bureau of the Census (census population), percent based on lane miles on-system, percent based on truck vehicle miles traveled on-system, percent based on percentage of census population below the federal poverty level, percent based on centerline miles on-system, 0 percent based on congestion, and 0 percent based on fatal and incapacitating OGC: 0/0/0 :0 PM

Texas Department of Transportation Page of 0 0 vehicle crashes; () Category Statewide Connectivity Corridor Projects - will be allocated to districts for specific projects selected by the commission based on engineering analysis of projects on three corridor types: (A) Mobility corridors - congestion considerations in areas that are not in the boundaries of an MPO; (B) Connectivity corridors - two-lane roadways requiring upgrade to four-lane divided roadways to connect the urban areas of the state; and (C) Strategic corridors - strategic corridor additions to the state highway network; () Category Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement - will be allocated to districts and MPOs as an allocation program for projects in a nonattainment area population weighted by ozone and carbon monoxide pollutant severity; () Category Metropolitan Mobility and Rehabilitation (TMA) - will be allocated to MPOs operating in areas that are transportation management areas as an allocation program based on the applicable federal formula; () Category Transportation Alternatives [Enhancement] a portion [One-half] of the funds in this category will be OGC: 0/0/0 :0 PM

Texas Department of Transportation Page of 0 0 allocated to MPOs serving urbanized areas with populations over 00,000 [operating in transportation management areas] as an allocation program based on the areas relative share of [estimated] population, unless FHWA approves a joint request from the department and the relevant MPOs to use other factors in determining the allocation [within the boundaries of the metropolitan planning area using data derived from the most recent census provided by the U.S. Bureau of the Census]; and () Category District Discretionary - will be allocated to all districts as an allocation program based on state legislative mandates, but if there is no mandate or the amount of available funding in this category exceeds the minimum required by a mandate, the funding allocation for this category or the excess funding, as applicable, will be allocated according to the following formula: 0 percent based on annual on-system vehicle miles traveled, 0 percent based on annual onsystem lane miles, and 0 percent based on annual on-system truck vehicle miles traveled. (b) Pace factor calculation. For purposes of subsection (a)() of this section, the Pace factor is a calculation used to adjust funding among districts according to increases or decreases in a district's need to improve its pavement distress scores. It will slow the rate of improvement for districts with OGC: 0/0/0 :0 PM

Texas Department of Transportation Page 0 of 0 0 the highest condition scores and accelerate the rate of improvement for districts with the lowest condition scores. The Pace factor is calculated by: () determining the district with the highest distress score; () determining the deviation of a district's distress score from the highest score; () totaling the deviations for all districts as determined by paragraph () of this subsection. (c) Non-formula allocations. The commission, subject to the mandates of state and federal law and specific requirements contained in other chapters of this title for programs and projects described in subsection (a) of this section, will determine the amount of funding to be allocated to a district, metropolitan planning organization, political subdivision, governmental agency, local governmental body, [or] recipient of a governmental transportation grant, or other eligible entity from each of the following program funding categories described in. of this subchapter: () Category Non-Traditionally Funded Transportation Projects for specific projects; () Category Structures Replacement and Rehabilitation as an allocation program; OGC: 0/0/0 :0 PM

Texas Department of Transportation Page of 0 0 () Category Safety Projects generally funded as an allocation program with some specific projects designated under the Safety Bond Program; () Category Transportation Alternatives [Enhancement] of the remaining [one-half of the] funds in this category, a portion will be allocated to certain areas of the state, for specific projects, based on the areas relative share of the population, and a portion may be allocated in any area of the state for specific projects or transferred to other eligible federal programs, as authorized by law; [under this subsection as an allocation program;] () Category 0 Supplemental generally funded as an allocation program with some specific projects designated under miscellaneous federal programs; () Category Strategic Priority for specific projects; () Aviation Capital Improvement Program; () Public transportation; () Rail; and (0) State waterways and coastal waters. (d) Allocation program. For the purposes of this chapter, the term "allocation program" refers to a type of program funding category identified in the unified transportation program for which the responsibility for selecting projects and OGC: 0/0/0 :0 PM

Texas Department of Transportation Page of 0 0 managing the allocation of funds has been delegated to department districts, selected administrative offices of the department, and MPOs. Within the applicable program funding category, each district, selected administrative office, or MPO is allocated a funding amount and projects can be selected, developed, and let to contract with the cost of each project to be deducted from the allocated funds available for that category. (e) Listing of projects. The department will list the projects that the department intends to develop and let during the ten-year unified transportation program (UTP) under.0 of this chapter (relating to Unified Transportation Program (UTP)), and reference for each listed project the program funding category to which it is assigned. If a program funding category is an allocation program, the listing is for informational purposes only and contains those projects reasonably expected at the time the UTP is adopted or updated to be selected for development or letting during the applicable period. For the purpose of listing projects in the UTP, "project" does not include preventive maintenance and rehabilitation under Category Preventive Maintenance and Rehabilitation as described in subsection (a) of this section. (f) Limitation on distribution. In distributing funds to OGC: 0/0/0 :0 PM

Texas Department of Transportation Page of the districts, metropolitan planning organizations, and other entities described in subsections (a) and (c) of this section, the department may not exceed the cash flow forecast prepared and published in accordance with. of this subchapter (relating to Cash Flow Forecast). (g) Formula revisions. The commission will review and, if determined appropriate, revise both the formulas and criteria for allocation of funds under subsections (a) - (c) of this section at least as frequently as every four years. OGC: 0/0/0 :0 PM