CLIENT ALERT: U.S. STRIKES AT RUSSIAN OLIGARCHS, OFFICIALS AND ENTITIES, WITH POTENTIAL IMPACT ON NON-U.S. PERSONS

Similar documents
New Licenses Ease Ukraine, Russia Business Wind-Downs

EXECUTIVE ORDER RE-IMPOSES U.S. SECONDARY SANCTIONS AGAINST IRAN

International Trade Alert

Treasury Designates Russian Oligarchs, Officials, and Entities in Response to Worldwide Malign Activity

FREEHILL HOGAN& MAHAR LLP

U.S. SUSPENDS NUCLEAR-RELATED SECONDARY SANCTIONS AGAINST IRAN

Russia Sanctions United States by Swedish Club and Leigh Hansson, Partner, Reed Smith LLP, Reed Smith Shipping Sanctions 16 April 2018

Page 2 of 5 oligarch-related SDN companies and their subsidiaries. General License 13 authorizes transactions and activities ordinarily incident and n

U.S. and EU Sanctions on Iran and Russia For Le Cercle De la Compliance Beth Peters Lourdes Catrain Andrew Keller Aline Doussin.

U.S. Government Takes Steps Toward Implementation of Sanctions on Russia

Congress Readying Russia Sanctions: Implications for U.S. Nuclear Commerce. Aleksandar Dukic Ari Fridman June 28, 2017

CLIENT ADVISORY: THE OLIGARCH REPORT

Senate Adopts New Sanctions Targeting Russia and Iran

PUBLIC LAW AUG. 2, 2017

Cross-Border Regulatory and National Security Client Alert:

US sanctions against Iran

UNITED STATES WITHDRAWS FROM JCPOA AND REIMPOSES SECONDARY SANCTIONS AGAINST IRAN

Volume 87 December 2017

Russia, Iran, North Korea and Venezuela

Sanctions and End-Use Controls. Paul Whitfield-Jones Norton Rose Fulbright Julie Taylor Meggitt PLC

Issued on May 8, 2018 Updated on June 27, 2018

Selective OFAC Guideline Relating to the Lifting of Certain U.S. Sanctions Under the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) on Implementation Day

PUNISH RUSSIA US CONGRESS HITS THE RUSSIAN ENERGY SECTOR

INTRODUCTION TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY S OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL (OFAC) November 1, 2017

The Changing Sanctions Landscape and Law Enforcement s Perspective

Sanctions Risk Management Symposium

SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is

ECONOMIC SANCTIONS COMPLIANCE GUIDANCE MARCH 2016

President Trump Withdraws the United States from the Iran Nuclear Deal

United States Withdraws from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action with Iran

U.S. Sanctions Relief: Good for Russian Companies but Bad for Policy? By Richard Nephew January 11, 2019

EN+ GROUP PLC Consolidated Interim Condensed Financial Information for the three and nine months ended 30 September 2018

THE UNITED STATES LIFTS SECONDARY SANCTIONS ON IRAN AND TAKES STEPS TO IMPLEMENT CERTAIN OTHER LIMITED SANCTIONS RELIEF

SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is

Congress Reaches Agreement on New Sanctions against Russia, North Korea, and Iran

Responding Properly To OFAC Obligations

U.S. Economic Sanctions

A. 1. What is Implementation Day? When does the lifting of sanctions under the JCPOA go into effect?

Updated Russia Sanctions Bill Is Introduced to the U.S. Congress

Ep. 4: Sanctions and Transactions

UNITED STATES ENACTS NEW LAW REQUIRING THE IMPOSITION OF ADDITIONAL ECONOMIC SANCTIONS WITH RESPECT TO NORTH KOREA, IRAN AND RUSSIA

GUIDANCE RELATING TO THE LIFTING OF CERTAIN U.S. SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO THE JOINT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF ACTION ON IMPLEMENTATION DAY

313. What is the Iran Freedom and Counter-Proliferation Act of 2012 (IFCA)?

Developments in U.S. Sanctions Against Iran, Russia, and Venezuela

HOW SHOULD CHINESE COMPANIES FACE INCREASED US ENFORCEMENT RISK FROM THEIR GLOBAL BUSINESS OPERATIONS?

RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING OFAC AND RELATED SANCTIONS ISSUES

Sanctions (OFAC) Compliance Update

National Bar Association Commercial Law Section Evolution of Financial Crime: FinCEN & Leading Compliance Practices Thursday, February 15, 2018

Opportunities While Meeting Strict,

Frequently Asked Questions and Answers. Questions Related to the NDAA (Section 1245 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012)

Doing business in Iran EHSAN HOSSEINZADEH, ATTORNEY AT LAW & PARTNER AT EDUCATED LAWYERS LAW FIRM

U.S. Sanctions Additional Russian Targets

Securities Update. By Troy M. Calkins and Kimberly K. Rubel. Timing. Heightened Compensation Committee Independence Standards

Group Sanctions Policy

General Questions What is the Iran Freedom and Counter-Proliferation Act of 2012 (IFCA)?

SECURITIES LITIGATION & REGULATION

NEW US SANCTIONS AGAINST RUSSIA SANCTIONS AGAINST RUSSIA. HOW IS SWEDISH TRADE WITH RUSSIA AFFECTED? What is new?

Credendo Client Memo Snap-back of international sanctions regime against Iran April 2017

OFAC Amends and Reissues Syrian Sanctions Regulations

SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is publishing

Compliance and New Legislation in Delaware and Beyond. Sponsored By: Wolters Kluwer. CT Corporation

US Sanctions Summary (updated September 2018)

Economic and Political Environment in Ukraine and Russia

Additional U.S. Sanctions with Respect to Iran Signed Into Law on January 2, 2013

Implications of the EU Blocking Statute and U.S. sanctions on Iran

Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC) New Jersey Bankers Association Compliance University June 23, Asaad A.

Expanding The Extraterritorial Reach Of US Sanctions

PRESIDENT TRUMP ANNOUNCES U.S. WITHDRAWAL FROM THE IRAN NUCLEAR ACCORD AND RE-IMPOSITION OF WIDE-RANGING U.S. SANCTIONS

CONTINENTAL REINSURANCE ( C Re ) ANTI-MONEY LAUDERING/COUNTERING THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM (AML/CFT) POLICY

Evolving U.S. Economic Sanctions and their Legal Implications Cuba, Iran, Russia and Burma

International Trade Compliance and Enforcement Bulletin

Annex II Sanctions-related commitments

THE AMERICAN CLUB SO YOU RE THINKING OF GOING WHERE? THE SHIPOWNER S GUIDE TO SANCTIONS PIRAEUS JUNE 9, 2011

Welcome to Baker McKenzie Stockholm Fifth Annual Trade Day. 7 November 2017

U.S. Sanctions Against Russians, Ukrainian Separatists and Iran What it Means For Insurers OFAC Compliance Programs

Overview of US Sanctions Regarding Crimea

U.S. RESTRICTIONS ON OVERFLIGHTS AND AIR TRANSPORTATION SERVICES. By Lonnie Anne Pera

An Excerpt From: K&L Gates Global Government Solutions 2012: Annual Outlook

GovCon OnDemand: U.S. Sanctions on Trade with Iran - Update on Restrictions Applicable to U.S. and Non-U.S. Persons

How to continue doing business with Iran despite the re-imposition of US Sanctions?

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ( FAQs ) REGARDING ENFORCEMENT AGAINST FOREIGN PERSONS OF U.S. TRADE SANCTIONS AGAINST IRAN OVERVIEW

Official Journal of the European Union

IRAN SANCTIONS OVERVIEW

Impact of Canadian Economic Sanctions, Trade Controls and Anti-Corruption Laws on the AML Compliance Function

The Implications Of Lifting Sanctions Against Sudan

Complying With List-Based Sanctions Programs. Law360, New York (October 12, 2010) -- The majority of recent sanctions programs

Implementing an Effective Sanctions and Export Compliance Program

Deutsche Bank AFC/ Sanctions. TECC London 2015 W2 - Sanctions April 23, 2015

Global Business Club of Mid-Michigan Export 201: Export Controls The Updates Government Regulations You Need to Know

AGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury. SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury s Office of Foreign Assets

KIRKLAND ALERT. Iran Sanctions: A New Era Announced. Implementation Day Summary of Changes and Remaining Restrictions. U.S. Lifting of Sanctions

Publication of Guidance Relating to the Provision of Certain Temporary Sanctions Relief,

FACILITY DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL

Financial Sanctions in the Funds Sector and EMIR Update

Conducting KYC of Third Parties: Best Practices for Conducting Due Diligence

IRAN SANCTIONS UPDATE

Doing Business in an International World: The Importance of U.S. Export Control Compliance

AIBA. 14 September 2010

American Bar Association Section of Real Property, Probate and Trust Law 2008 Annual Spring Symposia May 1-2, Washington, D.C.

In this issue. February Volume 30 Number 2. Timely News and Analysis of Export Regulations. Untangling New 50 Percent Rule

Transcription:

CLIENT ALERT: U.S. STRIKES AT RUSSIAN OLIGARCHS, OFFICIALS AND ENTITIES, WITH POTENTIAL IMPACT ON NON-U.S. PERSONS April 12, 2018 Introduction On April 6, 2018 the United States Office of Foreign Asset Affairs ( OFAC ), in conjunction with the State Department, designated to the U.S. Specially Designated Nationals List ( SDN List ) seven of Russia s wealthiest oligarchs, 12 companies which they own and 17 senior Russian government officials. As a result, any property or interests in property of these individuals or entities, which are subject to U.S. jurisdiction, are now blocked. U.S. persons are prohibited from engaging in any transactions with the designated individuals and entities. Foreign individuals could be subject to U.S. sanctions if they facilitate significant transactions for or on behalf of the designated individuals and entities. Background To understand the implications of the April 6 th designations, it is necessary to look back to the passage of the Countering America s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act ( CAATSA ) on August 2, 2017. That act addressed Iran, North Korea and Russia and had several provisions which relate to the current designations to the SDN list. Section 241 of CAATSA required that within six months of the passage of the Act the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence and the Secretary of State, provide the U.S. Congress with a detailed report on senior political figures and oligarchs in the Russian Federation, as determined by their closeness to the Russian regime and their net worth. CAATSA also directed that the report discuss the potential impacts of imposing secondary sanctions on those identified. Another key provision of CAATSA was Section 228, which amended the Support for the Sovereignty, Integrity, Democracy and Economic Stability of Ukraine Act of 2014 ( SSIDES ) to require the mandatory imposition of sanctions on any foreign person who knowingly facilitates a significant transaction or transactions for or on behalf of any persons subject to sanctions NEW YORK NEW JERSEY CONNETICUT

imposed by the United States with respect to the Russian Federation, or any child, spouse, parent, or sibling of an individual subject to sanctions. On January 29, 2018, the Secretary of the Treasury delivered the Section 241 report to Congress listing 210 individuals along with the additional analysis required by Section 241. While none of those individuals were added to the SDN List at that time, the April 6th designations include a number of individuals from that list. Impact of the Designations As mentioned above, all assets of the individuals and entities designated to the SDN list, which assets are within the jurisdiction of the United States, are now blocked. In addition, U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in any transactions with parties on the SDN list. As a result, U.S. banks cannot process any payments to or from those individual/entities designated to the SDN List. The designated oligarch owned companies are: AGROHOLDING KUBAN BASIC ELEMENT LIMITED B-FINANCE LTD. EN+ GROUP PLC GAZ GROUP GAZPROM BURENIE, OOO JSC EUROSIBENERGO LADODA MENEDZHMENT, OOO NPV ENGINEERING OPEN JOINT STOCK COMPANY RENOVA GROUP RUSSIAN MACHINES UNITED COMPNAY RUSAL PLC In addition, also designated were a Russian state-owned weapons trading company, Rosoboroneksport OAO and a Russian bank which it owns, Russian Financial Corporation. The full list of those designated on April 6th can be found at: https://www.treasury.gov/resourcecenter/sanctions/ofac-enforcement/pages/20180406.aspx While the U.S. SDN List typically does not have extraterritorial effect, in this instance foreign persons are potentially exposed to U.S. sanctions because of the amendment of Section 10 of SSIDES by Section 228 of CAATSA. Under amended Section 10, it is now mandatory that sanctions be imposed on any foreign person who is determined to have knowingly facilitated a significant transaction for or on behalf of any person subject to U.S. sanctions against Russia, which would include all of those individuals and entities designated on April 6th. OFAC FAQs advise that, as used in Section 10, persons subject to sanctions imposed by the United States with respect to the Russian Federation, includes persons listed on either the SDN List or the Sectoral Sanctions Identification List. Section 10 also extends to any child, spouse, parent or sibling of any designated individual. Obviously, of critical importance is what is meant by facilitates and significant transaction.

Key Definitions OFAC FAQ 545 sets forth what OFAC anticipates will be the definitions of key terms to be included in forthcoming regulations implementing Section 10 of SSIDES. FAQ 545 addresses the key terms facilitates and significant transaction as follows: facilitation... for or on behalf of For purposes of section 10(a)(2) of SSIDES, facilitating a significant transaction for or on behalf of a person will be interpreted to mean providing assistance for a transaction from which the person in question derives a particular benefit of any kind (as opposed to a generalized benefit conferred upon undifferentiated persons in aggregate). Assistance may include the provision or transmission of currency, financial instruments, securities, or any other value; purchasing, selling, transporting, swapping, brokering, financing, approving, or guaranteeing; the provision of other services of any kind; the provision of personnel; or the provision of software, technology, or goods of any kind. significant transaction For purposes of section 10(a)(2) of SSIDES, OFAC will consider the totality of the facts and circumstances when determining whether transactions are significant. OFAC will consider the following list of seven broad factors that can assist in the determination of whether a transaction is significant : (1) the size, number, and frequency of the transaction(s); (2) the nature of the transaction(s); (3) the level of awareness of management and whether the transaction(s) are part of a pattern of conduct; (4) the nexus between the transaction(s) and a blocked person; (5) the impact of the transaction(s) on statutory objectives; (6) whether the transaction(s) involve deceptive practices; and (7) such other factors that the Secretary of the Treasury deems relevant on a case-by-case basis. One additional guideline provided by the FAQs is that a transaction is not significant if U.S. persons would not require specific licenses from OFAC to participate in it. However, note that facilitating can include transporting, which suggests that the transport of goods for one of the Russian entities named to the SDN List could conceivably be a sanctionable activity for a non-u.s. shipowner, if the carriage was determined to be a significant transaction. Reviewing the factors listed above which will be considered by OFAC to determine if a transaction is significant, it is difficult to predict how OFAC will evaluate cases of ocean transport. It would seem that a single carriage of goods, involving no deceptive practice, would perhaps not be considered significant. On the other hand, if a shipowner entered a long-term COA with one of the designated entities, that might be viewed as significant.

While it is, at this point, impossible to predict how OFAC will apply these criteria for significant transactions on a case by case basis, we do know that these targeted sanctions are designed to place maximum pressure on individuals and entities with close ties to the Russian regime, while at the same time avoiding unintended consequences. FAQ 545, relating to the activities of foreign persons, states in conclusion: The intent of the designations on April 6, 2018 is to impose costs on Russia for its malign behavior. The United States remains committed to coordinating with our allies and partners in order to mitigate adverse and unintended consequences of these designations. Therefore, it would not be surprising if OFAC took a broad view of these sanctions, but at the same time exercised careful judgment as to what constitutes sanctionable activity by a foreign person. The 50% Rule It should be noted that it is not sufficient to simply confirm that an entity with which you are transacting business is not on the U.S. SDN List, which can be searched by means of an OFAC online search tool found at: http://sanctionssearch.ofac.treas.gov/. That is because entities which are not listed on the SDN List can nonetheless be considered as Specially Designated Nationals if they are 50% or more owned by an entity on the SDN List. This so-called 50% Rule, as implemented by OFAC, provides that if an entity is 50% or more, individually or in the aggregate, directly or indirectly, owned by persons or entities on the SDN List, it is itself considered an SDN, even though not listed. Therefore, even though a company is not listed on the SDN List, an effort should be made to determine the company s ownership, to insure that it is not more than 50% owned by persons/entities who are on the SDN List. General Licenses Nos. 12 and 13 In conjunction with the designation of Russian individuals and entities to the SDN list on April 6, OFAC issued General License No.12 and General License No. 13, both designed to provide parties already engaged in transactions with designated individuals/entities a limited period of time to disengage. General License No. 12 applies to 12 of the designated companies, as well as any entity in which one or more of the companies, directly or indirectly, owns a 50% or greater interest. The license provides that all transactions which are otherwise prohibited by the Ukraine Related Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 589, but which are ordinarily incident and necessary to the maintenance or wind down of operations, contracts or other agreements are authorized to continue until 12:01 AM Eastern daylight time, June 5, 2018. However, any payment for the benefit of a blocked person must be made into a blocked, interest-bearing account located in the United States. The license also lists a number of activities which are specifically not authorized by the license. Finally, the license provides that any U.S. persons engaging in transactions authorized by the general license are required to file a comprehensive, detailed report of each such transaction with OFAC within 10 days after June 5, 2018.

General License No. 13 applies to only three of the designated entities, namely, EN+ Group PLC, GAZ Group and United Company RUSAL PLC. General License No. 13 permits, until May 7, 2018, activities and transactions, otherwise prohibited by the Ukraine Related Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 589, that are ordinarily incident and necessary to divest or transfer debt, equity or other holdings in the three named companies to a non-u.s. person, or to facilitate the transfer of debt, equity or other holdings in the three named companies by a non-u.s. person to another non-u.s. person. The license specifically does not permit U.S. persons to sell to or purchase from the three companies or any other entity whose property is blocked under the Ukraine Related Sanctions Regulations any debt, equity or other holdings in such companies, or to facilitate such transactions with such entities. As with General License No. 12, a U.S. person who engages in transactions authorized by General License No. 13 is required, within 10 days after May 7, 2018, to file a comprehensive and detailed report of each transaction with OFAC. https://www.treasury.gov/resource- General Licenses Nos. 12 and 13 can be found at: center/sanctions/programs/pages/ukraine.aspx. Summary Major Russian oligarchs and their companies were designated to the U.S. SDN list on April 6, 2018. U.S. persons can no longer engage in transactions with those designated individuals and entities, and all property of those individuals and entities, which is subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, is now blocked. Non-U.S. persons may be engaged in sanctionable activity under the U.S. sanctions against Russia if they engage in or facilitate a significant transaction with any individuals or entities who have been designated to the SDN list under the U.S. sanctions against the Russian Federation. FREEHILL HOGAN & MAHAR LLP 80 Pine Street, 25 th Floor New York, NY 10005 212-425-1900 www.freehill.com William L. Juska, Jr. Gina M. Venezia William J. Pallas juska@freehill.com venezia@freehill.com pallas@freehill.com Disclaimer: This Client Alert provides only a general summary of the impact of the April 6, 2018 designation to the U.S. SDN List of various Russian individuals and entities and is not intended to constitute comprehensive legal advice. Specific legal advice should be taken with respect to each individual inquiry regarding the designations. For additional clarification, please feel free to contact Bill Juska (juska@freehill.com), Gina Venezia (venezia@freehill.com) or Bill Pallas (pallas@freehill.com).