Required Sections of Handbook Guidance

Similar documents
To: Financial Examiners. From: NAIC Examination Unit Staff. Date: January 21, Re: Sound Practices in Documenting Reliance on Audit Workpapers

Accreditation Program Manual SEG/IAR Form

Report on Inspection of RSM US LLP (Headquartered in Chicago, Illinois) Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

NAIC POLICY STATEMENT ON FINANCIAL REGULATION STANDARDS

Report on Inspection of BDO Canada LLP (Headquartered in Toronto, Canada) Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

Report on Inspection of McGladrey LLP (Headquartered in Chicago, Illinois) Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

Chapter 2 Professional Standards

CFE 4 Financial Analysis STUDY GUIDE. Effective July 2017

Report on Inspection of B F Borgers CPA PC (Headquartered in Lakewood, Colorado) Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

Report on Inspection of Zachary Salum Auditors PA (Headquartered in Miami, Florida) Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

Report on Inspection of Grant Thornton LLP (Headquartered in Chicago, Illinois) Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

Report on Inspection of KPMG LLP (Headquartered in Toronto, Canada) Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

Report on Inspection of Albert Wong & Co. LLP (Headquartered in New York, New York) Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

Report on Inspection of Ernst & Young LLP (Headquartered in New York, New York) Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

Sections of the ORSA Report

Report on Inspection of Zhang Hongling CPA, P.C. (Headquartered in Flushing, New York) Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

Report on Inspection of Arnett Carbis Toothman LLP (Headquartered in Charleston, West Virginia) Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

Master Document Audit Program. Activity Code Compliance Audit CAS 409 Version 5.22, dated March 2018 B-1 Planning Considerations

Activity Code Compliance Audit CAS 403 Version 6.23, dated March 2018 B-1 Planning Considerations

Report on Inspection of Saturna Group Chartered Professional Accountants LLP (Headquartered in Vancouver, Canada)

The District Municipality of Muskoka

City of Ottawa Financial Statement Audit Results

New Laws and Regulations in Washington, DC

Report on Inspection of MaloneBailey, LLP (Headquartered in Houston, Texas) Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

Report on Inspection of Mark Shelley CPA (Headquartered in Mesa, Arizona) Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

The entity's risk assessment process will assist the auditor in identifying risks of materials misstatement.

Report on Inspection of East West Accounting Services LLC (Headquartered in Miami, Florida) Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

NAIC OWN RISK AND SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT (ORSA) GUIDANCE MANUAL

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY ON BEHALF OF SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Chapter 10. Auditing the Revenue Process

Guidance on the Approval and Supervision of Special Purpose Vehicles under Solvency II

Report on Inspection of Pinaki & Associates LLC (Headquartered in Newark, Delaware) Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

Companion Policy CP to National Instrument Certification of Disclosure in Issuers Annual and Interim Filings.

Report on Inspection of RBSM LLP (Headquartered in McLean, Virginia) Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

ISA 315 (Revised), 1 Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement through Understanding the Entity and Its Environment

STANDARD FOR AUDITS OF SMALL ENTITIES

VILLAGE OF NEW HAVEN REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES

Report on Inspection of M&K CPAS, PLLC (Headquartered in Houston, Texas) Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

Understanding the Entity and Its Environment and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement

[Designated for AT Section 701, Management s Discussion and Analysis]

Finance and Administration Committee 2014 FINANCIAL AUDIT PLAN BKD, LLP

Report on Inspection of George Stewart, CPA (Headquartered in Seattle, Washington) Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

BERMUDA MONETARY AUTHORITY

Report on Inspection of Edward Richardson Jr., CPA (Headquartered in Southfield, Michigan) Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

CFPB Supervision and Examination Process

Report on Inspection of ZAO Deloitte & Touche CIS (Headquartered in Moscow, Russian Federation) Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

Report on Inspection of PLS CPA A Professional Corporation (Headquartered in San Diego, California) Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

Capital Adequacy MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL. Weak controls may increase the bank's exposure to errors and omissions.

CFPB Supervision and Examination Process

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION... 1

Report on Inspection of D. Brooks and Associates CPA's P.A. (Headquartered in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida)

Powell River Regional District and Powell River Regional Hospital District Final Report to the Board of Directors

Report on Inspection of RSM US LLP (Headquartered in Chicago, Illinois) Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

The State of Market Conduct Collaboration

Report on Inspection of AMC Auditing, LLC (Headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada) Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

STATE OF NEW MEXICO Office of the State Auditor

HOSPITAL AUDIT PROGRAM GUIDE

Report on Inspection of MSPC, Certified Public Accountants and Advisors, A Professional Corporation (Headquartered in Cranford, New Jersey)

Conforming Amendments to PCAOB Auditing Standards Resulting from the Adoption of Auditing Standard No. 5

ASB Meeting July 17-20, 2017

Market Regulation Accreditation Guidelines and Assessment Checklist

Report on Inspection of Yu Certified Public Accountant, P.C. (Headquartered in New York, New York) Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

COMPANION POLICY CP TO NATIONAL INSTRUMENT CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE IN ISSUERS ANNUAL AND INTERIM FILINGS TABLE OF CONTENTS

Supervisory Framework JUNE 2012

LIST OF SUBSTANTIVE CHANGES AND ADDITIONS. PPC's Guide to Audits of Employee Benefit Plans. Twenty sixth Edition (February 2016)

ORSA Summary Report Similarities/Differences Regulator Observations

Master Document Master Document. Compensation. Version 6.16, dated March 2018 B-1 Planning Considerations

A SSURANCE AND A DVISORY BUSINESS SERVICES A PRIL 28, City of Ottawa. Audit Results and Communications

THE STATE OF FLORIDA

INTERNAL AUDIT PLAN OF ACTIVITIES

RISK-BASED BANK SUPERVISION MANUAL

Report on Inspection of WDM Chartered Professional Accountants (Headquartered in Vancouver, Canada) Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

British Columbia Lottery Corporation Board Manual Tab 8 TERMS OF REFERENCE: AUDIT COMMITTEE

ASB Meeting October 16-19, 2017

Project Management for the Professional Professional Part 3 - Risk Analysis. Michael Bevis, JD CPPO, CPSM, PMP

Form F Effectiveness

OSFI Supervisory Model

AUDIT UNDP COUNTRY OFFICE AFGHANISTAN FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT. Report No Issue Date: 10 December 2013

Report on Inspection of BDO Auditores, S.L.P. (Headquartered in Madrid, Kingdom of Spain) Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

LEGAL NOTICE TOWN OF FARMINGTON, CONNECTICUT REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR AUDITING SERVICES

Master Document Audit Program. Activity Code Compliance Audit CAS 414 Version 5.20, dated March 2018 B-1 Planning Considerations

Audit Planning PRESENTED BY: MICHAEL L. FORTMAN, CPA SENIOR MANAGER BROK A. LAHRMAN, CPA SENIOR MANAGER

Report on Inspection of Suttle & Stalnaker, PLLC (Headquartered in Charleston, West Virginia) Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

12 th June 2012 NOTICE. subject to. respect to enhanced group s risk. or (ii) the and that the. necessary

MEMORANDUM. Item A: Audit of City of San Juan Capistrano Payroll Transmittals

ANNUAL REPORT ON THE INTERIM INSPECTION PROGRAM RELATED TO AUDITS OF BROKERS AND DEALERS

STATE OF MINNESOTA Office of the State Auditor

ISAE 3000 Staff Adaptation of Requirements from ISAs 210, 300, 315 and 330

Work Plan for the Consideration of Incorporating International Financial Reporting Standards into the Financial Reporting System for U.S.

FHA-Lender ENGAGEMENT LETTER

BERMUDA MONETARY AUTHORITY

December 30, Mr. Amis Lagzdins Senior Compliance Adviser Financial and Capital Market Commission Kungu Street 1. LV-1050 Riga, Latvia

Report on Inspection of PricewaterhouseCoopers AB (Headquartered in Stockholm, Kingdom of Sweden) Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

Report on Inspection of TJS Deemer Dana, LLP (Headquartered in Dublin, Georgia) Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

2. Identifying missing property/cash: Account for property disposition (in use, returned to respondent, sold, missing)

Report on Inspection of Castillo Miranda y Compañía, S.C. (Headquartered in Mexico City, United Mexican States)

Multifamily Mortgage Business Lender Memo April 30, 2015 HIGHLIGHTS

N A T I O N W I D E S T A T E / F E D E R A L S U P E R V I S O R Y A G R E E M E N T. November 14, 1996

STANDARD STATEMENT OF WORK FOR FINANCIAL AUDITS OF NON-U.S. ORGANIZATIONS CONTRACTED BY THE RECIPIENT

LIST OF SUBSTANTIVE CHANGES AND ADDITIONS PPC's Guide to Audits of Nonpublic Companies. Thirty third Edition (February 2015)

Transcription:

Section 1 - General Examination Guidance 1.I.B 1.I.B 1.I.B.b(3) 1.I.C 1.I.D 1.I.E / Exhibit Z 1.I.H 1.I.I 1.II.B 1.III.A Scheduling an Exam Financial Exam Electronic Tracking System (FEETS) EIC Requirements Coordinating Exams of Multi- State Insurers Coordination of Holding Company Group Exams Review and Reliance on Another State's Workpapers; Exhibit Z Limited-Scope Exams Interim Work Authority and Responsibility of EIC General IT Review Required Sections of Handbook Guidance The following chart is a tool that may be used to assist examiners in identifying which elements within the Financial Condition Examiners Handbook are required to be completed as part of every The requirements listed encompass exam administration and planning, execution and review of examination work (including required exam procedures and exhibits) and examination wrap-up and deliverables. There may be additional procedures that the examination team deems necessary to be conducted during an examination that go beyond the requirements listed below. It is also possible that some elements will not be applicable to every Professional judgment should be utilized in making such determinations. This tool should not be viewed as authoritative guidance. The Financial Condition Examiners Handbook should be consulted for further clarification as necessary. Exams should be scheduled in accordance with state statutes. Regulatory financial examinations should occur no less than once every five years. Exams of multi-state insurers must be called in FEETS. Exams of single-state insurers that are part of a holding company group should be called in FEETS. The Examiner-in-Charge (EIC) of multi-state examinations must be a Certified Financial Examiner (CFE) or be directly supervised by a CFE. Exams of multi-state companies are required to be called in FEETS at least 90 days in advance of fieldwork. Coordination is encouraged, but not required. Examiners are required to document attempts to coordinate if the company under examination is part of a holding company group. Role as a Lead State/Fully Participating State/Other State will be determined based on criteria set forth in this section. Exhibit Z, Part Two should be used to document the coordination plan for the holding company group and how the requirements outlined in Section 1.I.D - Coordination of Holding Company Group Exams have been met. An exam report is required to be shared with the other impacted states when a limitedscope examination is completed. Notification of each round of interim work should be provided to all states in which the insurer is licensed or writing business. Exhibit AA - Summary Review Memorandum (or similar document) should be utilized to summarize the results of each round of interim work. The Examiner-in-Charge (EIC) of multi-state examinations must be a Certified Financial Examiner (CFE) or be directly supervised by a CFE. The 6-step process for conducting an IT Review is required for all exams, except for specific scenarios described in this section in which the IT Work Program may be bypassed. Exhibit C - Evaluation of Controls in Information Technology (IT) should be used to assist in this review. 1.III.B Materiality Planning materiality must be calculated and documented. 1.III.E / Exhibit I 1.III.G 1.IV.B Use of Specialist; Exhibit I Use of Ind. Contractors Examination Documentation The department is required to document decisions on use of specialists in the Exhibit I - Examination Planning Memorandum. For certain examinations, a credentialed actuary is required to be involved. Work performed by a specialist must be performed in accordance with the 7 phases of an exam. The insurance department is required to be involved in directing and monitoring work performed by independent contractors. The standards outlined in this section are required when a contractor is utilized. Exam documentation must be prepared in sufficient detail to provide a clear understanding of the work performed.

1.IV.B Preparer and Reviewer Sign-offs Every workpaper is required to be signed off by a preparer and reviewer. 1.IV.C Review of General Ledger and Journal Entries A review of significant nonstandard journal entries should be performed. The exam should leverage work performed by CPAs in this area when possible. 1.IV.D Review of Affiliated Transactions - Workpaper Documentation Much of this section contains informational guidance. However, the examiner is required to gain an understanding of the insurer's relationships and transactions during the planning process. Significant agreements, transactions and/or findings should be documented in Exhibit I - Examination Planning Memo. Additional procedures may be required in later phases of the exam, based on the examiner's assessment of risk in this area. 1.IV.E a-b / Exhibit G 1.IV.E c 1.IV.F / Exhibit Q 1.IV.G / Exhibit T 1.IV.H / Exhibit P Consideration of Fraud; Exhibit G Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Examination Review Responsibilities; Exhibit Q Letter of Representations; Exhibit T Review of Subsequent Events; Exhibit P A consideration of fraud is required on each Exhibit G - Consideration of Fraud (or a similar document) should be used to document this assessment. The examination procedures outlined in this section are required for companies offering covered products. Much of this section contains informational guidance. However, a few specific requirements are listed, including sign-offs at certain points in the examination, timeliness of sign-offs, and the type of review to be conducted. Exhibit Q - Review and Approval Summary may be used to assist in documenting these requirements. A management representation letter must be obtained. Exhibit T - Letter of Representation provides an example template that should be customized to the insurer under A review of events subsequent to the examination period is a required procedure for all examinations. Exhibit P - Review of Events Subsequent to the Examination Period should be used to document this review. 1.IV.I Review of Premium Taxes A review of premium tax is a required procedure for all examinations. 1.IV.J / Exhibit BB Summary of Unadjusted Errors; Exhibit BB If misstatements are detected and not posted, they must be summarized. Exhibit BB - Summary of Unadjusted Errors should be used to accumulate misstatements. 1.V.A Evaluation of Risk Transfer An evaluation of Risk Transfer should be performed for significant reinsurance contracts. 1.IX.A 1.IX.C 1.IX.D 1.IX.E Interim Reporting to Chief Examiner The Report of a Full Scope Examination The Management Letter The Report of a Limited Scope Examination Status reports and the elements contained in this section of guidance are required. An examination report is required for each full-scope The use of a management letter or other form of communication is required on an If no comments necessitate this communication, such should be documented in the file. If a limited-scope exam is conducted, a report is required and should include items a-f of this section. 1.IX.H Coordination and Distribution of the Examination Report of a Multi-State Insurer and the Resolution of Report Conflicts Guidance in this section is required 1.IX.I Timeliness of Examination Reports Guidance in this section is required

Section 2 - Risk-Focused Examination Process 1 / Exhibit A, Exhibit B, Exhibit C Gather Necessary Planning Information; Exhibit A, Exhibit B and Exhibit C The examiner is required to gather information during planning in order to gain an understanding of the Company. The examiner should review information already available to the department or obtained through pre-planning procedures before making additional requests. The examiner should also meet with the department financial analyst prior to requesting information to be used in examination planning. In this meeting, a discussion of the Insurer Profile Summary should occur. After meeting with the department financial analyst and reviewing information previously obtained or otherwise available to the department, the examiner may make additional information requests of the company. Exhibit A - Examination Planning Procedures Checklist, Exhibit B - Examination Planning Questionnaire, and Exhibit C - Evaluation of Controls in Information Technology may be utilized to assist the examiner in fulfilling the requirements outlined in Phase 1. 2 2 / Exhibit CC 3 2.Phase 1.B / Exhibit M 2.Phase 1.B 2.Phase 1.C / Exhibit E 2.Phase 1.D 2.Phase 1.E / Exhibit V Review of Gathered Information Risk Identification/Tracking; Exhibit CC Analytical Reviews Understanding Corporate Governance; Exhibit M Interviews Assessing the Adequacy of the Audit Function; Exhibit E Identifying Key Functional Activities Prospective Risk; Exhibit V Reviewing information obtained in this section to gain an understanding of the company is a required element of the The examiner should consult with the department analyst to determine if analyst work may be utilized. Significant risks or issues identified through reviewing the gathered information should be documented on Exhibit CC (or a similar document). Analytical procedures should be performed during planning to assist in identifying areas of concern that should be investigated further during an The examiner should utilize work performed by the department analyst, when possible, in order to maximize examination efficiencies and reduce duplication of work. A review of the Corporate Governance Structure is a required element of the Exhibit M - Understanding the Corporate Governance Structure is a tool that may be used to document this review and assessment. Interviews with the Board of Directors and/or Management are required to be performed. The extent of which is to be determined by the examination team. Guidance in this section provides various elements that should be considered when assessing the adequacy of the audit function, which is a required element of the Exhibit E - Audit Review Procedures should be utilized to document this review and a clear conclusion regarding planned reliance. A memo may be used to supplement the information documented within Exhibit E. Key activity selection is required. The exam is required to consider the company's prospective solvency position. Prospective risks that relate to just one key activity should be included on the respective key activity matrix. Risks related to multiple or no key activities should be addressed on Exhibit V - Prospective Risk Assessment. A preliminary listing of overarching prospective risks should be identified by the end of Phase 1. Further identification and assessment of prospective risk may extend beyond Phase 1. The assessment of overarching prospective risks should be completed by the end of Phase 5.

2.Phase 2.A Identifying the Risk Examiners are required to identify risks and write risk statements for those identified risks. 2.Phase 2.B 2.Phase2.C 2.Phase2.D / Exhibit DD Identifying the Type of Risk Assessing the Inherent Risk Critical Risk Categories; Exhibit DD A branded risk classification must be assigned to each risk. Examiners should consider assigning exam assertions to FR risks. Likelihood of Occurrence and Magnitude of Impact should be assessed for each identified risk. Examiners should apply judgment in these assessments in order to reach overall IR assessment and document the final conclusion on matrix. At the conclusion of Phase 2, the examiner should utilize Exhibit DD - Critical Risk Categories to demonstrate that all critical risks facing the insurer have been selected for review. If the insurer is not exposed to a particular critical risk category, the examiner is required to document support for that assessment in the planning memo. 2.Phase2.D / Exhibit I 2.Phase2.D 2.Phase3.A Planning Memo; Exhibit I Supervisor Sign-Off on Planning Identifying Controls At the conclusion of Ph. 2, the examiner should document the results of planning in a planning memo. Exhibit I - Examination Planning Memorandum should be utilized to ensure all necessary elements are documented. Planning documentation, including the planning memo, should be reviewed and approved by both the chief examiner (or designee) and the examiner-in-charge prior to the performance of control (Phase 3) testwork. An understanding of controls for each identified risk is required to be documented. Design of control must be appropriate for the inherent risk. 2.Phase3.B&C 2.Phase4 2.Phase5.A / Exhibit K Evaluating Controls Determine Residual Risk Risk Matrix; Exhibit K Examiners must reach a conclusion on the strength of controls. If controls aren't tested, they should be assessed as weak. Examiners are required to conclude upon a residual risk level. If exercising judgmental residual risk, the rationale must be documented. Exhibit K - Risk Assessment Matrix (or similar document) is required to be completed as an all-encompassing documentation tool incorporating all phases of the exam. 2.Phase5.A Sign-off on Planned Detail Tests Prior to the performance of Phase 5 testwork, planned detail examination procedures should be approved and signed-off on by the chief examiner (or designee) and the examiner-in-charge. 2.Phase5 Establish/Conduct Detail Exam Procedures High residual risk requires detail procedures. Moderate requires fewer detail procedures. Low RR without any control testing requires some level of detail tests. 2.Phase 6 / Update Prioritization & Exhibit H, Exhibit Supervisory Plan; Exhibit H, U, Exhibit AA Exhibit U and Exhibit AA A supervisory plan must be maintained for each domestic insurer, which is typically the responsibility of the financial analyst. The supervisory plan is often included in Exhibit H - Insurer Profile Summary (IPS); however, for high-priority or potentially troubled insurers a separate document may be appropriate. Exhibit U - Supervisory Plan provides a template that may be used in those instances. The examiner should update the financial analyst regarding examination results that impact the prioritization level or supervisory plan of the company. This communication may be documented using Exhibit AA - Summary Review Memorandum (SRM). 2.Phase7.A 2.Phase 7.B 2.Phase 7.C / Exhibit AA 2.Phase 7.D Draft Exam Report Management Letter Summary Review Memo Letter of Representations An Exam Report is required to contain significant findings of fact discovered during the exam. The report is required to follow the format outlined in the Handbook. Reports are required to be filed timely. Communication to the BOD or Management is required either through the use of a management letter or other form of communication. If no comments necessitate this communication, such should be documented in the file. Exhibit AA - Summary Review Memorandum or a substantially similar document should be utilized to communicate information to the financial analyst at the conclusion of an A customized Letter of Representation should be obtained from management as part of every Exhibit T - Sample Letter of Representation or a substantially similar document may be utilized.

Section 3 - Examination Repositories The examination repositories are not required to be used during an The purpose of the examination repositories is to provide a tool to assist examiners in determining which risks might be relevant in addressing a critical risk category during an The exam repositories are not intended to provide an all-inclusive listing of potential risks, nor to provide a minimum baseline of which risks are required to be identified on all exams. Section 4 - Examination Exhibits Please Note: A number of exhibits have been excluded from this chart as the use of the respective exhibit is not explicitly required. However, in many instances the related assessment is required to be conducted and the respective exhibit or a similar document may be utilized to document that assessment. These required assessments are listed elsewhere on this chart and reference the applicable exhibit that may be utilized. 4.Exhibit C 4.Exhibit E 4.Exhibit H 4.Exhibit I 4.Exhibit K 4.Exhibit P 4.Exhibit T 4.Exhibit V 4.Exhibit Z 4.Exhibit AA 4.Exhibit BB 4.Exhibit CC 4.Exhibit DD Exhibit C - Evaluation of Controls in Information Technology Exhibit E - Audit Review Procedures Exhibit H - Insurer Profile Summary Template Exhibit I - Examination Planning Memorandum Exhibit K - Risk Assessment Matrix Exhibit P - Review of Events Subsequent to the Examination Period Exhibit T - Sample Letter of Representation Exhibit V - Overarching Prospective Risk Assessment Exhibit Z - Examination Coordination Exhibit AA - Summary Review Memorandum (SRM) Exhibit BB - Summary of Unadjusted Errors Exhibit CC - Issue/Risk Tracking Template Exhibit DD - Critical Risk Categories The IT Planning Questionnaire is required to be completed, as well as a summary memo describing the results of the IT Review. A work program is required to be completed, with some exceptions depending on size and complexity, and should be customized to the insurer under A review and assessment of existing audit work is required. Exhibit E should be used for this purpose. An Insurer Profile Summary is required to be maintained for each domestic insurer. Certain elements are required but the format may vary. This document is typically maintained by the financial analyst. The Planning Memo must be signed-off by the supervisor. In addition, Exhibit I should be utilized to ensure all necessary elements are documented. The completion of a risk matrix as shown in Exhibit K (or similar document) is required. Exhibit P should be utilized in identifying and reviewing subsequent events A customized management representation letter must be obtained. This exhibit is required to be completed for those prospective risks that do not fit on a matrix (or relate to multiple matrices). Exhibit Z is required to be used to document coordination efforts if the company under examination is part of a holding company group. Exhibit AA - Summary Review Memorandum or a substantially similar document should be utilized to communicate information to the financial analyst at the conclusion of an This exhibit is required to be used in accumulating errors identified during an exam that are greater than the passed adjusting journal entry amount, if applicable. This exhibit (or similar document) is required to be used in accumulating unique risks and/or those of heightened concern throughout planning. This exhibit is required to be completed to demonstrate that each critical risk category is appropriately addressed in an