Ready to Switch from Guaranteed-Cost to Loss-Sensitive? 5 Considerations for Your Insurance Program

Similar documents
Protecting Your Credit Union

Safety initiatives can lead to financial forecasting errors

Claims denied. 1 No medical evidence of injury. 2 No injury per statutory definition. 3 Reservation of rights. 4 Pre-existing condition.

Horse Racing Program. Gaming, Entertainment & Sports Practice

CAPTIVE INSURANCE PROGRAMS. Turning your Workers Compensation Premiums into Profits

Introduction to STOP LOSS CAPTIVES

Corporate Risk Appetite and Program Structuring White paper 3 of 3

AICUM Benefits of Self-Funded Health Plans

Daniel Keough & Martin Brauch, CFA Innovative Captive Strategies, Inc. (ICS)

The hidden impact of product recall

THE COMIC-CON OF RISK FINANCING

In-Plan Guaranteed Lifetime Income:

Results of Lockton s 2018 risk management survey

Time for a Captive Refresh?

Anthem funding solutions More options, more control over health care spending

The right endorsement

Could an All-Payer System Improve the Affordability of US Health Care? Overview. David V. Axene, FSA, FCA, CERA, MAAA

The Role of ERM in Reinsurance Decisions

A GUIDE TO UNDERSTANDING, COMMUNICATING, AND INFLUENCING ACTUARIAL RESULTS

15285 AccessIntroBookEngCover 4/3/06 12:34 PM Page 1 ACCESS A NEW LEVEL OF PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT

U.S. P&C Law Departments Rate the Metrics They Use to Manage Costs and Performance. LexisNexis Property & Casualty ALAE Cost Containment Survey

Captives and Medical Benefits

WELCOME TO THE WORLD OF CAPTIVES

ORSA for Captives. Vermont Captive Insurance Association 2013 Annual Conference. Moderator: Sandy Bigglestone, Director of Captive Insurance, VT DFR

1-2-3s of Allocating Cost of Risk

Sexual Harassment. Is your company exposed? Explosive allegations of sexual harassment against high-profile

New legislation brings changes to how data is handled

Understanding Owner-Owned Captives

What s in a Name: White-Label Funds in DC Plans

The Art of Self Insurance

ERM in the Rating Process: A Practical Perspective

Risk Management Solutions. Delivering High-Quality Outcomes for Large Accounts

Lockton Benefits Bureau. Benefits made easy

Lockton Surety Operations. Offering Our Clients Surety Bond Programs and Solutions

Considerations for a Hospital-Based ACO. Insurance Premium Construction: Tim Smith, ASA, MAAA, MS

Improve claims outcomes through data, analytics, and advocacy

2018 Medicare Fact Sheet

Portrait Portfolio Funds

NEW YORK STATE WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD ASSESSMENTS

Creative Solutions to Rising Employee Benefit Costs. September 12, 2016

RISK FINANCING AND ALL THAT JAZZ:

Reviewing In Force (Pre Regulation) Corporate Split Dollar Plans

A Never-Ending Battle

What to Do When the Actuary s Answer is Too High. Timothy C. Mosler, FCAS, MAAA

The Feasibility Process

Investment Policy Statement Questionnaire

LONG TERM CARE 2010 GENERAL LIABILITY AND PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY Actuarial Analysis August 2010

Construction. Industry Advisor. Fall Year end tax planning for construction companies. How to self-insure your construction business

Aon Insurance Managers Bermuda

Medical Stop Loss Carriers Evaluation & Selection

THE PITFALLS OF EXPOSURE RATING A PRACTITIONERS GUIDE

CHAPTER 13 STRUCTURE OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY. by Larry Harris, PhD, CFA

Lockton Commercial Surety Operations. Offering Our Clients Surety Bond Programs and Solutions

Aligning products and investments to investor goals. Taking a holistic view of client goals to deliver the best solution

TRENDS IN SENIOR LIVING LITIGATION

RISK COMMITTEE TERMS OF REFERENCE. The Board has resolved to establish a Committee of the Board to be known as the Risk Committee.

Lockton SCORE System. Contractor User Guide

Aon Hewitt Solutions. Curtiss Wright. June 2, 2014 Meeting. Risk. Reinsurance. Human Resources.

The PAINLESS GUIDE TO HRPS

Reg 114 Trusts: How They Work, Who Can Benefit, and Why They re Not All Alike

Insurance built to protect your business.

How to make changes to your annuity income

The Purpose of a Captive Captives vs. Traditional Insurance Structuring a Captive Determining the Feasibility and Goals of a Captive Domicile

Self-funding can give employers more control over every aspect of their medical insurance programs

An Alternative to the ACA for Small Groups. Level Funding: Introduction. Joe Slater, FSA, MAAA

Capital Base Expectations and Solvency

Pension Reform - A Top-Down Roadmap to Success

Ratemaking for Captives and Alternative Market Vehicles

BENEFITS & COMPENSATION INTERNATIONAL TOTAL REMUNERATION AND PENSION INVESTMENT

Collateral Challenges and Alternatives for Workers Compensation Self Insurers

R02 Portfolio Construction and Management

SANDELL HOLDINGS LTD. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

Practice Set #2 and Solutions.

Case Studies in Success: Employee Benefits in Single-Parent Captives

Financial Highlights

Making Voluntary Benefits an Employer Benefit

Self-Insuring Worker s Compensation through a Tennessee Captive

How to Choose Your DME billing Company

Determining your investment mix

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FISCAL YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2018 AND 2017 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

2017 Your. Connector Access Guide

Transitioning to T+2 Settlement 1 FOR PLAN SPONSOR USE ONLY. NOT FOR PLAN PARTICIPANT DISTRIBUTION

Aon Risk Maturity Index

Get experience on your side. Non-Profit Organizations Directors and Officers. Management Liability Insurance

GALLAGHER REAL ESTATE & HOSPITALITY PRACTICE. Real Insurance Solutions for Real Estate and Hospitality

REDUCING TOTAL COST OF RISK THROUGH ANALYTICS

A New Approach for Determining Claim Expense Reserves in Workers Compensation

Determining Exchange Rates. Determining Exchange Rates

Lesson 3 Permanent Life Insurance

Basic Reserving: Estimating the Liability for Unpaid Claims

Actuarial Review of the Self-Insured Liability Program

How are the funds diversified among asset classes and sectors?

Group Captives - Competing in a Soft Market

Re: Informational Bulletin: Notice to Actuaries Submitting Actuarial Summaries and Studies for Private Self-Insured Employers

Under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), groups with 50 or

President s Report March 18, 2015

Insurance Contracts for 831(b) Enterprise Risk Captives Policies and Pooling Agreements

OHIO PLAN RISK MANAGEMENT, INC. Columbus, Ohio. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2016 and 2015

Ready, Set, Implement

ACA Reporting Software/Vendor Setup:

Transcription:

Ready to Switch from Guaranteed-Cost to Loss-Sensitive? 5 Considerations for Your Insurance Program January 2018 Lockton Companies Fixed pricing is convenient. Small businesses can benefit from an insurance program that provides this convenience while minimizing their risk. Guaranteed-cost programs often fit the bill. In a guaranteed-cost program, all liabilities and administration costs are transferred to the carrier; the insured pays an up-front premium to cover these costs. However, as your business grows, you may want to explore more financially beneficial options for financing and managing risk. With a loss-sensitive program, the cost of risk varies with loss experience. The insured is responsible for costs incurred up to a retention amount, and the carrier pays for all excess costs. Although the total cost depends substantially upon ultimate losses, there are additional determining factors to consider. LIZETH MCDONALD Risk Analyst 972.204.9105 mlmcdonald@lockton.com KELLY BILLINGS, FCAS, MAAA Vice President Manager of Casualty Analytics 816.960.9933 kbillings@lockton.com GUARANTEED-COST: Insured pays a set cost. Carrier pays all claims and admin costs. LOSS-SENSITIVE: Cost varies based on loss experience. Insured pays a premium and costs up to a retention amount. Carrier pays excess costs. L O C K T O N C O M P A N I E S

Deciding which insurance program is best for your growing company is sometimes overwhelming. Here are five factors to help you determine whether you are ready to make a switch: 1. Determine your risk tolerance with volatility modeling The first thing to consider when evaluating a program is how much risk your company is willing to take. In a guaranteed-cost program, the final cost of each policy year does not depend on the losses from that year, but instead on those from the previous two to three years combined with industry experience. An experience modification factor (emod) is calculated from this loss experience to modify industry rates, and once exposures are determined for the policy year, the premium is fixed. How much risk is your company willing to take? By contrast, the total cost of a given policy year in a loss-sensitive program is dependent on the losses. The total cost is an estimate until all losses are fully closed, which could take up to 20 or 30 years. Lockton looks at a range of outcomes to measure volatility based on total cost of risk, including retained losses, vendor costs and premiums. Looking at point estimates, as well as ranges around these estimates, can help you make an informed decision on acceptable risk tolerance from both expected cost and variability standpoints. If the insurance carrier isn t giving you enough credit for your favorable experience in its pricing, this option can help you capture that additional benefit. Program comparison Total program cost Projected Losses Lowest Loss amount Highest Retention: Guaranteed cost $250K $500K $750K 2

January 2018 Lockton Companies 2. Evaluate your readiness for claims handling Guaranteed-cost programs give you less control over the cost of claims handling because it is included in the premium. This can be a disadvantage if your company has good loss experience. If the carrier can settle losses for less than anticipated, the benefit goes directly to the carrier, and you forfeit any possible returns from favorable losses. This can also be problematic if the carrier handles claims in a way that s not in your company s overall best interest; for example, handling claims that can affect your company s reputation or increase negative publicity. On the other hand, a loss-sensitive program provides more options to manage claims outcomes. In many cases, you can choose your own claims handler and other risk control vendors and direct their policies and procedures. Taking a higher retention gives your company incentive to prevent losses. Any reduction in losses below the retention lowers the total cost of the program. By having direct control over losses, your company can actively reduce cost through aggressive claims management, effective safety practices and return-towork programs. 3. Be aware of unpaid claims liabilities and potential collateral requirements Because all risk is transferred to the carrier under a guaranteed-cost program, there is no need to worry about how losses pay out in the future. With a losssensitive program, how and when claims are paid needs to be considered. Loss-sensitive programs come in two forms: self-insured retention and deductible. In both instances, the company needs to set aside money on its financial statements to account for the unpaid claims. This can become a point of negotiation if the company ever changes ownership and problematic if claims come in higher than initially expected. 3

With a deductible program, the carrier requires collateral from your business. With deductibles, the carrier pays all losses and seeks reimbursement for retained losses from the insured. This creates a credit risk for the carrier and requires that the company post collateral to securitize the risk of not being reimbursed. The carrier may reduce the amount of collateral required if it s proven that the company is a good credit risk and the company continues to renew with that carrier. Collateral grows because new policy years are added before the prior ones are totally paid out, causing the amount of unpaid loss that the collateral secures to increase. This growth in collateral can be anticipated by forecasting five years of collateral requirements. The graph below demonstrates stacking new policy years at each renewal as the prior year s amount decreases as claims payouts. Since this collateral amount can stack to be a material amount, it is important to identify the best form of collateral to achieve your company s goals and evaluate whether a self-insured program is a viable option to avoid or reduce collateral requirements. Collateral scenario analysis Does the five-year collateral estimate breach your credit capacity? Collateral required Upcoming renewal Next renewal 3rd renewal 4th renewal 5th renewal Total collateral held Collateral held for upcoming renewal Collateral held for next renewal Collateral held for 3rd renewal Collateral held for 4th renewal Collateral held for 5th renewal 4

January 2018 Lockton Companies 4. Know the impact to your cash flow Another important variable to consider when evaluating options is how they will fit your company s cash-flow needs. A loss-sensitive program offers a cash-flow advantage because claims are paid out over time as opposed to prefunding losses through guaranteed-cost premiums. Under guaranteed-cost programs, all investment income on those funds stays with the carrier. Lockton supports program structure decisions by providing estimates of the cash-flow impact to your company s finances. We help you understand your choice of structures, minimize the net present value (NPV) of costs and focus on optimizing cash flow for your business. A loss-sensitive program offers a cash-flow advantage because claims are paid out over time as opposed to prefunding losses through guaranteedcost premiums. 5. Understand the tax implications Changing the structure of your program can also have tax implications. Premiums for guaranteed-cost and loss-sensitive programs are both tax-deductible in the year they are paid. Losses retained under the deductible are only tax-deductible when paid. However, case reserves and incurred but not reported (IBNR) reserves are not deductible, so this creates a book-versus-tax timing difference. This portion of the tax deduction will be delayed until the case and IBNR reserves pay out, which could take several years. 5

Another option: group captive programs Sometimes the size of a company s premiums is not large enough to generate an appropriate amount of premium savings for taking on a large deductible. For example, with a smaller program, the credit for taking a $100,000 deductible might be only $45,000, and the risk-to-reward trade-off is unattractive. In these instances, group captives can be an ideal third option. They offer a company the ability to save on commercial insurance costs by taking risks and benefiting from good loss experience, many times before this opportunity is available in the commercial marketplace with a large deductible. Under a group captive program, the initial premium is paid like a guaranteed-cost premium and is tax-deductible. Your company s historical claims determine the claims-funding portion of the premium. Group captives may be an ideal option for companies with relatively low loss frequency that spend approximately $300,000 $1,200,000 on guaranteed-cost insurance. Changing the structure of your insurance program can be a complicated decision. Lockton can help you evaluate your options and determine the best fit for your company. 6

January 2018 Lockton Companies NOTES 7

Our Mission To be the worldwide value and service leader in insurance brokerage, risk management, employee benefits and retirement services Our Goal To be the best place to do business and to work RISK MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEE BENEFITS RETIREMENT SERVICES lockton.com 2018 Lockton, Inc. All rights reserved. KC: 38001