Impact of recent U.S. tax legislation on Israeli Companies May 13, 2008 Doron Sadan, Tax Partner, PwC Israel Tel:

Similar documents
M&A Tax Aspects for Portfolio Companies

Year End Planning and other Issues

Exploitation of US Intellectual Property Rights in Ireland

MANAGING INTERNATIONAL TAX ISSUES

WELCOME TO OUR WEBINAR

Onshoring Manufacturing

Coming to America. U.S. Tax Planning for Foreign-Owned U.S. Operations. By Len Schneidman. Andersen Tax LLC, U.S.

TEI School - Houston. Intangible Property ( IP ) - Basics in IP Planning. May 3, 2017

SOUTH AFRICA GLOBAL GUIDE TO M&A TAX: 2017 EDITION

Presented to: NRF Canadian Tax Clients. New U.S. tax legislation Impact on Selected Cross-Border Transactions

CONTROLLED FOREIGN COMPANIES

What Entity Do You Want To Be?

2014 Latin America Tax Summit

SUMMARY OF INTERNATIONAL TAX LAW DEVELOPMENTS

Cyprus Tax Update. Kyiv May 2018

Ministerial Circulars 1037/2015, 1039/2015 & 1042/2015

Intellectual property in the age of BEPS

Tax Management International Forum

Israeli Taxes on Swiss Properties

CHILE GLOBAL GUIDE TO M&A TAX: 2017 EDITION

Part I. Rulings and Decisions Under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986

Year-End Planning & Opportunities

Setting up your Business in Peru Issues to consider

Spanish Tax Considerations for U.S. Investors

International Tax Slovenia Highlights 2018

International Tax Japan Highlights 2019

Setting up your Business in Georgia Issues to consider

Annual International Bar Association Conference Sydney, Australia. Recent Developments in International Taxation. Republic of Cyprus

Coming to America. U.S. Tax Planning for Foreign-Owned U.S. Operations. By Len Schneidman. Andersen Tax LLC, U.S.

GERMANY GLOBAL GUIDE TO M&A TAX: 2017 EDITION

Canadians with International Assets

NEW ZEALAND. Country M&A Team Country Leader ~ Peter Boyce Arun David Declan Mordaunt Todd Stevens David Rhodes Eleanor Ward Mark Russell Peter J Vial

CHINA GLOBAL GUIDE TO M&A TAX: 2017 EDITION

US TAXATION SYSTEM. Omri Yaniv International Tax Manager, PwC

Tax planning for U.S. business operations of Indian enterprises

TECHNICAL EXPLANATION OF THE SENATE COMMITTEE ON FINANCE CHAIRMAN S STAFF DISCUSSION DRAFT OF PROVISIONS TO REFORM INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS TAXATION

Taxation of cross-border mergers and acquisitions

Recent developments in international tax

25th Annual Health Sciences Tax Conference

US Tax Reform: Impact on Private Funds

Understanding the Basic Building Blocks of the Canadian Foreign Affiliate Rules

International Tax Japan Highlights 2018

Taxation of cross-border mergers and acquisitions

International Tax Primer Andrew D. Oppenheimer, Esq. October 31, 2017

International Tax Greece Highlights 2019

International Tax Israel Highlights 2018

Structures. Including Cyprus

BUSINESS MODELS IN THE CURRENT BEPS ENVIRONMENT DO YOU NEED TO CHANGE? Lyndon James, Partner Pete Rhodes, Senior Manager PwC

Greek tax considerations on Real Estate investment. 21 January 2019

Setting up your Business in the PRC Issues to consider

U.S. Tax Reform Key Highlights

Cloud Computing Vered Kirshner, Tax Partner, PwC Israel Rayla Rappaport, Tax Senior Manager, PwC Israel November 2017

ROMANIA GLOBAL GUIDE TO M&A TAX: 2018 EDITION

FDU: U.S. International Corporate Tax

South Korea Tax Profile Produced in conjunction with the KPMG Asia Pacific Tax Centre

International Tax Malta Highlights 2019

Agenda. South African Tax and Exchange Control Implications of Export of Intellectual Property ( IP )

Is it time for your country to consider the "patent box"?

STEP Silicon Valley Ireland: Gateway to Accessing the EU Market

International Tax Update

CYPRUS GLOBAL GUIDE TO M&A TAX: 2017 EDITION

1. What are recent tax developments in your country which are relevant for M&A deals? CFC

International Tax Greece Highlights 2018

Basic International Taxation

Headquarter Jurisdictions Around the World: A Comparison

POLAND GLOBAL GUIDE TO M&A TAX: 2017 EDITION

Recent cases on the application of Taiwan sourcing rules

Outbound investments -Tax issues. 21 April 2012 CA. N.C.Hegde

TECHNICAL EXPLANATION OF THE REVENUE PROVISIONS OF H.R. 5982, THE SMALL BUSINESS TAX RELIEF ACT OF 2010

Cross-border Outsourcing

US Taxation- A Primer

Taxation of cross-border mergers and acquisitions Denmark

INITIAL GUIDANCE ON NEW DEFERRED COMPENSATION RULES

Comparison of Key Anti-Base Erosion Rules in the Tax Reform Act of 2017 and under UK Tax Law Calum Dewar, PwC Mike Williams, HM Treasury

Chapter 12. Tax Administration. 94 PwC

COMPARISON OF EUROPEAN HOLDING COMPANY REGIMES

Provisions affecting private equity funds in tax reform bills House bill and Senate Finance Committee bill

FINLAND GLOBAL GUIDE TO M&A TAX: 2017 EDITION

Setting-up shop in the US - tax aspects

Taxation of cross-border mergers and acquisitions

Basics of International Tax Planning with Tax Reform

OECD BEPS ACTION 6. Prevention of Treaty Abuse Case Study

Taxation of cross-border mergers and acquisitions

Practical Implications of BEPS

BEPS Beyond Fortune 1000 October Armanino LLP amllp.com Armanino LLP amllp.com

U.S. Tax Seminar Updates & Developments November 2013

IP BOX TAX REGIMES. Rod Donnelly Thursday, September 14, 2017

EXPAT TAX HANDBOOK. Non-Citizens and U.S. Tax Residency. Tax Year Ephraim Moss, Esq Ext 101

Introduction to the Taxation of Foreign Investment in U.S. Real Estate

U.S. Inbound Investment. April 2017

Taxation of Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions

BUSINESS IN THE UK A ROUTE MAP

TAXATION OF PROFESSIONAL SPORTS PEOPLE

JONES DAY COMMENTARY

CPA Esther Wahome. Thursday, 16 August 2018

Chapter 24. Taxation of International Transactions. Eugene Willis, William H. Hoffman, Jr., David M. Maloney and William A. Raabe

Taxation of cross-border mergers and acquisitions

H. Compensation. Present Law

Cyprus Tax News Amendments to Cyprus s IP regime

Doing Business Guide. United States. 1st Edition. Marks Paneth LLP

Transcription:

Doron Sadan, Tax Partner, PwC Israel Tel: 03-7954584 doron.sadan@il.pwc.com The information contained in this presentation is for general guidance on matters of interest only. As such, it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional tax advisers.

Agenda Impact of Recent U.S. Tax Developments on Common Structures of Investment Deferred Compensation 409A Final Regulations Venture Capital Funds Highlight of Tax Considerations

Impact of Recent U.S. Tax Developments on Common Structures of Investment

Impact of Recent U.S. Tax Developments on Common Structures of Investment Common Structures of Investment Main Issues for Consideration Contemplated mode of operation Location of IP Beneficial tax regimes (e.g., Approved Enterprise in Israel) Finance considerations Inter-company transactions TP considerations Applicability of tax treaties Exit strategies Slide 4

Impact of Recent U.S. Tax Developments on Common Structures of Investment Common Structures of Investment IL Parent / US Sub IP owned by IL Parent US Parent / IL Sub IP owned by IL Sub US Parent / IL Sub IP owned by US Parent IP / AE IL R&D US Distribution IP US Distribution US Distribution IP / AE IL R&D AE IL R&D Slide 5

Impact of Recent U.S. Tax Developments on Common Structures of Investment Common Structures of Investment Israeli Parent Tax Considerations Israel Approved Enterprise. IL Parent / US Sub IP owned by IL parent US Activity performed within the U.S. by IL Parent Permanent Establishment. TP US as a Low Risk Distributor. Withholding Tax classification of transactions as sale, rent or license. Summary Tax efficient. Small tax cost when group is in overall loss position. R&D Distribution LRD IP / AE IL US Slide 6

Impact of Recent U.S. Tax Developments on Common Structures of Investment Common Structures of Investment Israeli Parent PE Issues Protective Return Foreign corporations that have a U.S. tax nexus (a U.S. trade or business or PE in case of a treaty) must file a U.S. tax return on annual basis to determine the foreign corporation s U.S. tax liability. Whenever there is a question whether the foreign corporation has such tax nexus, the foreign corporation may want to file a protective 1120-F. Such filing would generally: - Preserve the right to claim deductions in computing the taxable income for U.S. tax purposes. - Start statute of limitations for timely filing. In the case of Swallows Holding, the court determined that no deduction would be allowed for a foreign corporation which failed to file a return within 18 months* of the due date. Filing protective F-1120? IL US U.S. Trade or business? IP Sale to U.S. Customers Marketing Services * A foreign corporation may generally file its tax return up until the 15th day of the sixth month following the close of its taxable year. Treasury Regulations state that for purposes of computing a foreign corporation's taxable income, deductions will be allowed only if a return is filed by the foreign corporation within 18 months following the due date of the return (i.e., 18 months after the 15th day of the sixth month after the close of the taxable year). Slide 7

Impact of Recent U.S. Tax Developments on Common Structures of Investment Common Structures of Investment Israeli Parent Change of Ownership Section 382 (when no LRD) Facts Group operates for several years, IL performs R&D. No sales have been made by the group. Both IL and US have significant NOLs. A new investor intends to purchase more than 50% of the interests in the group. Issue Change in ownership Section 382 limitations on NOLs. IL IP / AE US R&D Manufacturing Marketing Slide 8

Impact of Recent U.S. Tax Developments on Common Structures of Investment Common Structures of Investment Financing Issues (when no LRD) When no LRD is implemented (i.e., US incurs losses in first few years), there is a need to finance US. US can be financed in one of the following alternatives, each of which entails potential adverse tax consequences: - Capital investment (generally classified as equity for U.S. tax purposes). Repayment IL IP Financing - Interest bearing loan (generally classified as debt for U.S. tax purposes). US - Hybrid instrument, e.g., non interest bearing capital notes (may be classified as equity for U.S. tax purposes on the one hand and as debt for Israeli tax purposes on the other hand). Potential U.S. withholding tax issues. Slide 9

Impact of Recent U.S. Tax Developments on Common Structures of Investment Common Structures of Investment Financing Issues Israeli Perspective Until recently, if a loan granted by IL to US yielded interest which did not meet the statutory measure (the increase in the CPI plus 4%; or, in certain cases, the difference in the NIS/USD plus 4%), the imputed interest on such loan would have been subject to Israeli tax at a flat rate of 40% with no right whatsoever to exemption, deduction or set off in respect of the tax (certain exceptions applied to certain hybrid instruments) in accordance with section 3(j) of the ITO. As a result of recent legislative changes in Section 3(j) of the ITO, the section no longer applies to loans that are subject to section 85A of the ITO (international transactions between related parties). On the other hand, such loan will be subject to the requirements stipulated under section 85A of the ITO (i.e., arm s length standards). Interest IL US IP Loan With respect to 2007 only, the ITA decided to interpret the law such that section 85A may not apply to certain hybrid instruments that have been classified as fixed assets in the hands of the lender. Slide 10

Impact of Recent U.S. Tax Developments on Common Structures of Investment Common Structures of Investment Israeli Parent Classification of Software Transactions Withholding Tax Implications Substantial Right is transferred? Make copies for distribution Make derivatives Make public performance of program Make public display Copyright right Yes No Copyrighted Article IL US IP Transfer of Software? Substantially all rights are transferred? Benefits & burdens of ownership are transferred? Sale to U.S. Customers Yes No Yes No Sale Capital Gain License Sale Lease Royalties Business Income Rent Characterization of rental income as business income under the US/Israel treaty and possible exemption if no PE. Slide 11

Impact of Recent U.S. Tax Developments on Common Structures of Investment Common Structures of Investment US Parent Tax Considerations Israel Approved Enterprise. Financing. OCS. US U.S. Controlled Foreign Corporation ( CFC ) issues. Withholding Tax Activity performed within the U.S. by IL sub Permanent Establishment. TP US also as a LRD. Financing Issues. US Parent / IL Sub IP owned by IL Sub Distribution R&D IP / AE US IL Summary Tax efficient, until distributions (or deemed distributions) are made to the U.S. Small tax cost when group is in overall loss position. Slide 12

Impact of Recent U.S. Tax Developments on Common Structures of Investment Common Structures of Investment US Parent Foreign Base Company Sales Income Under certain conditions a U.S. parent company is required to include in its taxable income, on a current basis, certain income generated as a result of its Controlled Foreign Corporation subsidiary s activity. One of such types of income is foreign base company sales income. Foreign base company sales income ( FBCSI ) is defined as income arising from the purchase or sale of personal property where: 1. The property is both produced outside the CFC's country of incorporation and sold for use, consumption or disposition outside such country*; and 2. The property is either bought from a related person and sold to any person, bought from any person and sold to a related person, or purchased or sold on behalf of a related person. FBCSI does not include income from the sale of personal property that is manufactured, produced or constructed by the CFC from personal property that it has purchased (the Manufacturing Exception ). Slide 13

Impact of Recent U.S. Tax Developments on Common Structures of Investment Common Structures of Investment US Parent Contract Manufacturing Proposed Regulations: Example Facts: At all times, Israel Co. retains control of the raw material, work-in-process, and finished goods, as well as the intangibles used in the conversion process. Israel Co. retains the right to oversee and direct the physical conversion of products by the Unrelated Manufacturers. Under the Proposed Regulations: If Israel Co. does not regularly exercise, through its employees, its powers of oversight or direction of Taiwan unrelated manufacturer manufacturing exception does not apply. If Israel Co. employees regularly exercise the right to oversee and direct the activities of Taiwan Unrelated Manufacturers in the manufacture of the products manufacturing exception does apply. 100% US Israel Co Contract Manufacturing arrangement Sale Swiss Co Taiwan Unrelated Manufacturers Manufacturing CFC Sale to unrelated customers outside of Israel (e.g., EU customers) 100% CFC Sale to unrelated customers Slide 14

Impact of Recent U.S. Tax Developments on Common Structures of Investment Common Structures of Investment US Parent Tax Considerations Israel Approved Enterprise. TP. US NOLs. Financing Intercompany balances U.S. debt/equity issues; WHT implications. Summary An inefficient tax structure. Small tax cost when group is in overall loss position. US Parent / IL Sub IP owned by US Parent R&D IP AE Manufacturing US IL Slide 15

Deferred Compensation 409A Final Regulations International Tax Aspects

Deferred Compensation 409A Final Regulations General Section 409A Section 409A generally applies to nonqualified deferred compensation that is earned and vested after December 31, 2004. Section 409A requires that nonqualified deferred compensation plans meet specific requirements. If the plan s document fails the requirements of Section 409A, then upon vesting, all participants are subject to tax on the deferred compensation balance plus an additional 20% tax plus interest charges. Additional Tax plus interest charges Slide 17

Deferred Compensation 409A Final Regulations What is Deferred Compensation? Deferred compensation is compensation that the service provider has a legally binding right to receive and that is payable in a later tax year Compensation including certain stock options and Share Appreciation Rights. Service provider including employees. Legally binding right may exist even if the right is subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture. Payable in a later tax year Arrangement that may provide for payment after shortterm deferral period (2 ½ months following year of vesting) is deferred compensation. Exclusion from being regarded as deferred compensation Certain qualified retirement plans, bona fide vacation leave, sick leave, compensatory time, disability pay or death benefit plans as well as certain severance pay plans, certain foreign plans, certain payments under the short-term deferral rule, and fair market value options and stock appreciation rights are excluded from being regarded as deferred compensation. Slide 18

Deferred Compensation 409A Final Regulations Implications on International Employees Section 409A applies to any U.S. taxpayer, among others to U.S. citizens and resident aliens working in the U.S. for either a U.S. based or a foreign based employer U.S. citizens and resident aliens working abroad for either a U.S. based or a foreign based employer Nonresident or resident aliens working in the U.S who participate in a plan maintained by current or former employer based in foreign country The final 409A regulations provide some relief and rights for participant of an Internationally sponsored plan and arrangements. However, they do not apply an overall exemption from Section 409A Employer, whether U.S.-based or foreign-based, whose employees are potentially subject to U.S. income tax should,as good practice, analyze all of its deferred compensation plans for compliance with 409A or else possibly subject its employees to adverse tax consequences Slide 19

Deferred Compensation 409A Final Regulations 409A Regulations Specific International Aspects The final regulations provide that compensation vested prior to becoming subject to U.S. taxation is not treated as deferred compensation under 409A even if such compensation is received at a time when the individual is subject to U.S. federal income taxation. This special provision does not mean that such compensation is exempt from U.S. income taxation when actually received. The final regulations provide for a de minimis exception for compensation deferred by a nonresident alien under a "foreign plan" for a given calendar year. Under the regulations, amounts deferred (within the de minimis limitation) are not treated as subject to 409A. Slide 20

Deferred Compensation 409A Final Regulations Applicability of 409A Matrix Residency of Employee Place of Employment Grantor of Deferred Compensation Application of 409A Employee is a U.S. citizen or a U.S. tax resident Within the U.S. Outside the U.S. U.S. Corporation Non-U.S. Corporation U.S. Corporation Non-U.S. Corporation Section 409A applies Employee is neither a U.S. citizen nor a U.S. tax resident Within the U.S. Outside the U.S. U.S. Corporation Non-U.S. Corporation U.S. Corporation Non-U.S. Corporation In most cases, nonapplicable N/A Slide 21

Venture Capital Funds Highlight of Tax Considerations

Venture Capital Funds Highlight of Tax Considerations Israeli Domestic Taxation Overview Under Israeli domestic law, a non-israeli resident is only subject to Israeli tax on income accrued or derived in Israel ( i.e., income from an Israeli source). Dividend income paid by Israeli corporations is generally considered Israeli source income and subject to a 20% - 25% tax rate*. Capital gains from non-traded Israeli securities derived by a non-israeli resident individual are generally subject to a 20% tax rate unless reduced by a tax treaty. Where the person directly or indirectly holds at least 10% of the company s shares during the 12 months preceding the sale, a 25% tax rate would apply. Foreign residents are generally exempt from tax on capital gains from the sale of securities traded on an exchange in Israel, to the extent that such gain is not attributable to a permanent establishment in Israel. U.S. INVESTORS Onshore Fund (U.S.) Common Structure IL Co (Israel) NON-U.S. INVESTORS EXEMPT INVESTORS Offshore Fund (Cayman) * The rate is mainly determined by the holding percentage of the interests in the company and may be reduced by an applicable treaty. Slide 23

Venture Capital Funds Highlight of Tax Considerations Israeli Domestic Taxation Certain Exemptions / Relieves Certain exemptions or relief may be available under Israeli domestic law and double taxation treaties, as follows: Section 16A ruling; Section 97 (b3) Exemption for Treaty Investors; Section 97 (b1) R&D Company; Section 97 (b2) Exemption for traded securities; Tax treaties U.S. INVESTORS Onshore Fund (U.S.) Common Structure NON-U.S. INVESTORS EXEMPT INVESTORS IL Co (Israel) Offshore Fund (Cayman) Slide 24

Venture Capital Funds Highlight of Tax Considerations Exemptions / Relieves Section 16A Main Aspects Section 16A rulings offer a measure of certainty for funds with regard to their tax positions, and facilitate the tax structuring of their activities in Israel. Generally, the ITA grants pre-rulings, according to which foreign investors in venture capital funds are exempt from tax in Israel and investors in private equity funds may enjoy reduced rates (15% for individuals, 25% for corporations, and exemption for tax exempt entities). The existence of a PE in Israel would not create adverse Israeli tax consequences for the fund. As such, the fund would be able have a local representative who would not be restricted with respect to the activities that they may perform in Israel. Slide 25

Venture Capital Funds Highlight of Tax Considerations Exemptions / Relieves Cont Section 16A Main Requirements There should be at least 10 investors in the Fund (foreign and Israeli) and each investor should hold no more than 20% of the fund s capital; and No more than 15% of the Fund s total investment in Israel should be invested in one entity. In other words, the Fund is required to hold at least seven Israeli portfolio companies; For VC Funds, at least 75% of the investment in each Israeli portfolio company should be performed by way of a capital contribution (i.e., not by way of a stock purchase). The ITA requires submission of certain generic investor information (e.g. entity type, name, residence). Slide 26

Venture Capital Funds Highlight of Tax Considerations Exemptions / Relieves Cont Section 97(b3): Generally, Section 97(b3) of the Israeli Income Tax Ordinance ( ITO ) provides an exemption for non-residents regardless of their holding percentage in an Israeli company with respect to capital gains from the sale of securities (even where not traded on a stock exchange in Israel) which were purchased between July 1, 2005 through December 31, 2008. The list of requirements outlined in Section 97(b3) include the requirement that the gain does not arise from a PE in Israel, and the requirement that the seller be a resident of a treaty country.* the receipt of the ruling under this section would generally not be available in case of conducting on going activities in Israel. Another disadvantage of this ruling is that in practice, the ITA typically requires a full disclosure of the investor information. * Additionally, the security cannot have been purchased form a related party or by means of a tax-free reorganization, and the taxpayer must comply with certain tax filing requirements. Slide 27

Venture Capital Funds Highlight of Tax Considerations Exemptions / Relieves Cont Section 97(b2): Generally, Section 97(b2) of the ITO provides an exemption for nonresidents regardless of their holding percentage in the Israeli investment with respect to capital gains from the sale of traded securities. If the traded securities were purchased prior to their registration for trade, the portion of the capital gain which would have been generated if the stocks were sold immediately prior to the registration for trade is subject to tax (unless other exemptions apply). The requirements outlined in Section 97(b2) include the requirement that the gain did not arise from a PE in Israel. Further, the exemption does not apply to stock of a Real-Estate Investment Trust ( REIT ). Slide 28

Venture Capital Funds Highlight of Tax Considerations Exemptions / Relieves Cont Section 97(b1): An additional exemption from tax is available to foreign investors on gains arising from the disposition of shares in Research and Development intensive company*. Under this section, an exemption is available, irrespective whether or not the foreign resident is a resident of a treaty country, where such interest was acquired through an allotment of shares. One of the main advantages of this provision is that it applies to the investee company, and there are no requirements with respect to the investors in such company. * Israeli income tax regulations include a detailed definition of an R&D intensive company. Slide 29

Venture Capital Funds Highlight of Tax Considerations Exemptions / Relieves Cont Utilization of an intermediate treaty country entity Due to the difficulties associated with the ability to enjoy the exemptions / relief mentioned above (i.e., the need to invest through an injection of capital; the differences in tax rates which lead to harsh disclosure requirements, and the applicability to treaty countries only, in some of the cases (mainly in private equity investments), it may be preferable to invest through an intermediate entity located in a treaty country, e.g., Luxembourg. The fact that many investment funds already have business presence in Luxembourg together with the fact that Luxembourg is the second most important investment fund domicile in the world after the U.S. may also contribute to the Decision to utilize a Luxembourg intermediate entity. Slide 30

Venture Capital Funds Highlight of Tax Considerations Exemptions / Relieves Treaty Exemption Examples Luxembourg / Israel tax treaty: The use of a suitable offshore intermediate company structure, such as investment through a Luxembourg holding vehicle, for an Israeli investment may: - increase flexibility in terms of future exit options; and - offer tax treaty protection on future repatriations / capital gains from the investment. It is important to note that such intermediary company should generally meet certain substance requirements. Substance!!! Foreign investors Fund Luxembourg Israeli Portfolio Under the unique circumstances of a Israel Luxembourg Treaty Benefits recent case, the Israeli court has determined that the ITA may rely on Dividends Capital Gain domestic law (specifically, section 86 of WHT the ITO) in determining eligibility for treaty Israel (non-treaty) 20% / 25% 20% / 25% benefits even in a case of a treaty with no Limitation of Benefits clause. Treaty rate 5% - 15% 0% Slide 31

Thank you THIS DOCUMENT WAS NOT INTENDED OR WRITTEN TO BE USED, AND IT CANNOT BE USED, FOR THE PURPOSE OF AVOIDING TAX PENALTIES THAT MAY BE IMPOSED ON THE TAXPAYER. 2008. All rights reserved. refers to the network of member firms of International Limited, each of which is a separate and independent legal entity. *connectedthinking is a trademark of LLP (US).