Deprivation in East Sussex Indices of Deprivation 2007

Similar documents
Indices of Multiple Deprivation: 2000, 2004 and 2007

Assistant Director Financial Services and Revenues

Intelligence Briefing English Indices of Deprivation 2010 A London perspective. June 2011

Church Urban Fund s vision is to see people and communities all over England flourish and enjoy life in all its fullness.

English Indices of Deprivation 2015 Bradford District in focus

Church Urban Fund s vision is to see people and communities all over England flourish and enjoy life in all its fullness.

Neighbourhoods. The English Indices of Deprivation Bradford District. Neighbourhoods. Statistical Release. June 2011.

Church Urban Fund s vision is to see people and communities all over England flourish and enjoy life in all its fullness.

Deprivation in Rochdale Borough Indices of Deprivation 2004 (Revised)

Indices of Deprivation 2015: Swindon Pharmaceutical Needs Assess Swindon Research Report

The Diocese of Coventry

Church Urban Fund s vision is for every church in every community to be involved in tackling poverty,

The Diocese of Chelmsford

The Diocese of Southwark

Stockport (Local Authority)

The Diocese of London

Stockport (Local Authority)

Local Child Poverty Measurement Frequently Asked Questions

Indices of Deprivation 2010

Indices of Deprivation

Child Poverty: Emerging Issues Paper

Cornwall and Isles of Scilly LEP: Strategy and Business Plan

Marmot Indicators 2015 A preliminary summary with graphs

Housing Market Report

Area Analysis of Child Deprivation 2014 (WIMD Indicators 2014) 1

Ward profile information packs: East Cowes

2016 Statistical Profile. (December 2016 Update) Durham City Major Centre. Altogether better. Durham. Durham Area Action Partnership

Public Health Portfolio Plan 2013/ /16

Age UK Waltham Forest Profile: Deprivation in Waltham Forest 08/01/2013

Wider determinants of health

2017 Statistical Profile. County Durham. Altogether better. Durham

Ward profile information packs: Wootton Bridge

Spending needs, tax revenue capacity and the business rates retention scheme. Neil Amin-Smith David Phillips Polly Simpson

Ageing across the UK. By James Bayliss and Frances Sly, Office for National Statistics. Introduction. Abstract

Understanding household income poverty at small area level

Multiple deprivation in help-seeking UK veterans

Ward profile information packs: Ventnor West

OPJSNA Factsheet 2: Wider determinants of Health in Older People (Income, Benefits and Poverty)

North Warwickshire Local Economic Assessment Summary. October 2011

THANET CCG Analysis of Deprived Areas

Local Transport Body contacts

THINGOE SOUTH ELECTORAL DIVISION PROFILE

The survey was conducted on a self-completion basis through an online survey. Overall 39 valid responses were received.

Cause célèbre or cause for concern? Local enterprise partnerships one year on

INDICATORS OF POVERTY AND SOCIAL EXCLUSION IN RURAL ENGLAND: 2009

Stratford-on-Avon Local Economic Assessment Summary. October 2011

Report Title: Treasury Management - Mid Year Report Assistant Director Financial Services and Revenues

Cambridgeshire County Council. Benchmarking report 24/01/2018

Southampton Partnership: Delivery Board Meeting 10 December 2009 Department for Work & Pensions Financial Inclusion Champions Initiative

REPORT ON GREATER ESSEX ECONOMY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. January 2017

Poverty and health. World Health Organisation 1997

Monitoring poverty and social exclusion 2009

FOCUSONLONDON 2011 POVERTY:THEHIDDENCITY

Dundee Partnership Fairness Strategy

Dundee City Electoral Wards Poverty Profile

Nuneaton & Bedworth Local Economic Assessment Summary. October 2011

Census 2011 Profile Number Four

Vital Issues. A report commissioned by East End Community Foundation. Written by Dr Megan Ryburn London School of Economics

Local Government Pension Scheme (England and Wales) Actuarial valuation as at 31 March 2013 Report on data used for experience analysis

MONITORING POVERTY AND SOCIAL EXCLUSION IN SCOTLAND 2015

Stephen Butler. Renewal notice. Charity and Community Insurance renewal pack

District Demographic Profile: Forest Heath

Healthy life expectancy: key points (new data this update)

For review, comment and to spark conversations.version as at 01 September 2016

Version 1.0. Published December Health Intelligence Unit, NHS Dumfries & Galloway. For more information please visit

HIDDEN NEEDS. Hidden Needs in Suffolk Five Years On ( ) A REPORT TO SUFFOLK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION. University of Suffolk

Tyne & Wear s. Work. Vital Issues communityfoundation.org.uk. Serving Tyne & Wear and Northumberland

West Lothian Health and Wellbeing Profiles key indicators and overview

POLICE FEDERATION OF ENGLAND AND WALES SURVEY OF MEMBERS 2006 TOP-LINE REPORT

Statistical Analysis of Worklessness in Southampton Executive Summary

London s Poverty Profile 2011

Report on the results of auditors work 2015/16. Local government bodies

EDA Redevelopment Area Analysis. Lawrence Wood Amy Glasmeier Fall 2003 One Nation, Pulling Apart

City of Edinburgh Health and Wellbeing Profiles key indicators and overview

Aberdeen City Health and Wellbeing Profiles key indicators and overview

South Lanarkshire Health and Wellbeing Profiles key indicators and overview

North Lanarkshire Health and Wellbeing Profiles key indicators and overview

Contracted-out reconciliation

Key findings from the Northern Rock Foundation Third Sector Trends Study in North East England

Dumfries & Galloway Health and Wellbeing Profiles key indicators and overview

Shetland Islands Health and Wellbeing Profiles key indicators and overview

MONITORING POVERTY AND SOCIAL EXCLUSION 2013

Inverclyde Health and Wellbeing Profiles key indicators and overview

Dundee City Poverty Profile

Michelle Jones, Stephanie Tipping

Profile of Virginia s Uninsured, 2014

Quantification of the economic impact of plain packaging for tobacco products in the UK

Hinckley and Bosworth Priority Neighbourhood Profile

INTRODUCTION. Economic Value of the Independent Museum Sector: Toolkit

Characteristics of children in need in England: Data quality and uses

Enterprise Adviser (EA) Network Enterprise Adviser profile

State of the City 2016

CPAG in Scotland response to the Scottish Government s consultation on a Child Poverty Bill for Scotland

Targeting Social Exclusion (June 2001) Rebecca Tunstall, Joseph Murray, Ruth Lupton and Anne Power, CASE. This research summary by Michael Clegg.

Concentrated Disadvantage

Communities and Local Government Committee. Reforming Local Authority Needs Assessment. Paper 1 Simplifying the Needs Assessment Formula

Haxby and Wigginton Ward Profile York Summary

Suffolk s Flexible Eligibility Statement of Intent

Early Years National Funding Formula: Technical note

Profile of Westy situated in Latchford East, Warrington. Map 1: Westy the Big Local Area

Transcription:

Deprivation in East Sussex Indices of Deprivation 2007 The new Indices of Deprivation 2007 (ID 2007) have recently been released by the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG). They update the previous indices which were published in 2004. The indices are used widely to analyse patterns of deprivation and to identify areas that would benefit from special initiatives or programmes. They are also an important tool in determining eligibility for specific funding streams. This note highlights some key findings for East Sussex and gives details of how to access more detailed information on East Sussex in Figures. Key findings for East Sussex Problems of multiple deprivation appear to have increased in all parts of East Sussex since 2004. Nearly 80% of the super output areas (SOAs) in East Sussex have a worse ranking for multiple deprivation in 2007 than they did in 2004. In East Sussex, 15 SOAs out of a total of 327 are within the 10% most deprived SOAs in England. This represents nearly 5% of the county s SOAs and is two more than in 2004. Fourteen of these 15 most deprived SOAs are in Hastings; the other one is in Eastbourne. Nearly 67,000 of the county s residents are income deprived while just under 25,000 experience employment deprivation. Change in levels of multiple deprivation since 2004 Every local district in East Sussex has declined in its national ranking. Lewes and Rother have both dropped by 25 places, Wealden by 23 places, Eastbourne by 13 places and Hastings by 7 places. In East Sussex, there are now 2 more SOAs within the most deprived 10% nationally and 6 more in the most deprived 20% than there were in 2004. National ranking (out of 354 LAs) Number of SOAs in worst 10% nationally Number of SOAs in worst 20% nationally SOAs with a worse ranking in 2007 2007 2004 2007 2004 2007 2004 Number Percent Eastbourne 104 117 1 1 8 6 49 83% Hastings 31 38 14 12 21 20 28 53% Lewes 218 243 - - - - 52 84% Rother 166 191 - - 3 1 45 78% Wealden 284 307 - - 1-81 85% East Sussex 94 101 15 13 33 27 255 78% Of the 327 SOAs in East Sussex, 255 (78%) have a worse deprivation ranking in 2007 than in 2004. Whilst the extent and levels of deprivation remain greatest in Hastings, the proportion of SOAs with a worse ranking in 2007 is lower in Hastings than in any other district in East Sussex.

East Sussex and the national picture Nationally, East Sussex s ranking dropped from the 11th to the 7th most deprived county in England out of 34 counties (excluding unitaries). The counties which rank 1 to 6 are Durham, Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly, Lancashire, Cumbria, Northumberland and Nottinghamshire respectively. Of all the counties in England, East Sussex has experienced the greatest fall in its ranking. East Sussex and the regional picture East Sussex has the highest levels of deprivation of all the counties in the South East. In East Sussex, 5% of SOAs are in the most deprived 10% nationally, compared to just 2% for the South East as a whole. Similarly, 10% of the East Sussex SOAs are in the most deprived 20% nationally, compared to 6% in the South East. Of the 95 SOAs in the South East ranked in the most deprived 10%, more than one in seven is located in Hastings. Across the greater South East, it appears that southern and eastern counties have fared worst over the last 3 years, with Essex, Kent and West Sussex also falling in the national rankings. Index of Multiple Deprivation 2007 SOAs in East Sussex Deciles of IMD (England) 100019601, 2007 District boundary

Multiple deprivation in Hastings Hastings national rank has declined from 38 in 2004 to 31 today - moving it from amongst the 20% most deprived local authority areas in England to the 10% most deprived category. Hastings remains the most deprived local authority area in the region. Hastings SOAs that are in the most deprived 10% nationally are most concentrated in Central St. Leonards, Castle and Gensing, but also affect 5 other wards in the borough. The most deprived SOA in the county is in Baird ward. Just over one quarter of SOAs (26%) in Hastings fall within the 10% most deprived category and almost 40% fall in the most deprived 20%. Index of Multiple Deprivation 2007 SOAs in Hastings Deciles of IMD 2007 (England) 100019601, 2007 Poverty affecting children The child poverty index or the Income Deprivation Affecting Children Index (IDACI) measures the proportion of children aged 0-15 years that are living in income-deprived households. This includes households in receipt of income support or tax credits. Although in relative terms, child poverty in East Sussex appears to be improving, the actual number of children living in low-income households has risen by over 800 to more than 17,000. Nearly one-in-five children (19%) in East Sussex live in low-income households. While almost 30% of children in Hastings live in low-income households, their number has actually decreased since 2004.

Ten of the county s SOAs are ranked within the 10% most deprived nationally for child poverty. This is 3 fewer than in 2004. The number of East Sussex SOAs in the worst 20% of areas has also reduced by 3 since 2004, from 38 to 35. Eight of the 10 SOAs with the highest levels of child poverty in East Sussex are in Hastings (in Baird, Tressell, Central St. Leonards, Gensing, Hollington and Ore); the other 2 are both in Sidley ward in Bexhill. Some of the worst affected areas for child poverty in 2004 have, however, seen some improvement over the past three years. Six of the county s SOAs that were previously amongst the 10% worst affected areas nationally for child poverty now come into the 20% most deprived category. Four of these six SOAs are in Hastings (in Hollington, Castle and Gensing wards). Poverty affecting children in 2007 SOAs in East Sussex Deciles of IDACI (England) 100019601, 2007. District boundary Poverty affecting older people The older people poverty index or Income Deprivation Affecting Older People Index (IDAOPI) measures the proportion of people aged 60 years and over who are in receipt of means-tested benefits (including their partners if also aged 60+). There are approximately 18,000 older people living in low-income households in East Sussex. The proportion of older people living in low-income households in East Sussex has increased from just under 11% in 2004 to nearly 14% today. In Hastings, more than one-in-five older people live in low-income households. Seven SOAs in East Sussex are amongst the 10% most deprived nationally, compared to just 3 in 2004.

Poverty affecting older people in 2007 SOAs in East Sussex Deciles of IDAOPI (England) 100019601, 2007. District boundary How deprivation is measured As in 2004, the ID 2007 measure deprivation at small-area level for super output areas (SOAs). These are areas that have been defined solely for statistical purposes. They are smaller than local authority wards and typically contain around 1,500 people. There are 327 SOAs in East Sussex and just under 32,500 in England. The ID 2007 measure seven different aspects (or domains ) of deprivation that cover a range of key economic, social and living environment issues. These domains relate to: income deprivation employment deprivation health deprivation and disability education skills and training deprivation barriers to housing and services living environment deprivation crime. The Index of Multiple Deprivation 2007 combines the scores from each of these seven separate domains to give an overall single multiple deprivation score for every SOA. Summary results for local authority areas are based on the scores and rankings for each SOA in their area. The ID 2007 also presents two supplementary indices measuring income deprivation amongst children and older people the Income Deprivation Affecting Children Index (IDACI) and the Income Deprivation Affecting Older People Index (IDAOPI). They measure the proportion of residents aged 0-15 or 60+ who are dependent on means-tested benefits support.

The ID 2007 are based on the same approach, structure and methodology used to create the previous 2004 Indices. Most of the indicators used to create the ID 2007 are based on data for 2005. However, some of the indicators are based on average data for a number of years (e.g. 2003-2005) and a small number are still based on 2001 Census data. Although the new indices update and are generally compatible with the ID 2004, both indices only provide relative measures of deprivation with the score for any one area being affected by the scores for every other area. It is therefore impossible to tell whether any change in score between 2004 and 2007 is due to a real change in the level of deprivation in an area or whether it is due to the scores of other areas going up or down. More details can be found in a summary description of The English Indices of Deprivation 2007 that has been published by the DCLG and is available at http://www.communities.gov.uk/communities/neighbourhoodrenewal/deprivation/deprivation07/ DCLG has also published a guidance note on Using the English Indices Deprivation 2007 (which can be downloaded from the same address) and will be publishing a full report in Spring 2008. Deprivation information on East Sussex in Figures We have published comprehensive information on the ID 2007 results for East Sussex on East Sussex in Figures (ESiF). Under the Deprivation folder in the Tables, charts and maps section of ESiF, this includes: detailed results for the IMD 2007 and the seven associated deprivation domains information on the results for the various sub-domains that relate to the main deprivation domains for education, skills and training, the living environment and barriers to housing and services detailed results for the two poverty indexes relating to children and to older people summary results at county and district level (based on the SOA scores and rankings for each area). We have also produced a large number of high quality maps for the county and each district that show the national rankings for every SOA in East Sussex to highlight those areas which are worst affected by: multiple deprivation income deprivation affecting children income deprivation affecting older people. These PDF files can be downloaded from the Published maps section of ESiF from the 2007 Indices of Deprivation section under Thematic maps. Further information For further information on the Indices of Deprivation 2007, please contact Tim Stephens in the Transport and Environment Department s Research and Information Team on 01273 481619 or email tim.stephens@eastsussex.gov.uk