ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT AND FLOOD MITIGATION

Similar documents
CITY OF PLANTATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM NO

10/5/2015. What Makes a Sound Floodplain Management Program? What are the Flood Problems in your Community?

Sources of FEMA Funding

FEMA FLOOD MAPS Public Works Department Stormwater Management Division March 6, 2018

Resources for Disaster Recovery Terry Lunn Hazard Mitigation Division Director

Floodplain Management Plan

WELCOME!! Please sign in on one of the attendance rosters

A CASE STUDY ON FLOOD INSURANCE AFFORDABILITY AND MITIGATION IN THE CITY OF BIRMINGHAM, AL. Edwin Revell, CFM

Disaster Insurance: Are States and Insurance Companies Prepared?

David A. Stroud, CFM AMEC Earth & Environmental Raleigh, NC

Upper Joachim Creek Public Survey on Potential Flood Risk Reduction

Michael Taylor, PE, CFM Project Manager, AECOM August 25, 2015

The National Flood Insurance Program and Flood Insurance Rate Map for San Francisco. Presentation at Treasure Island Community Meeting

Mitigation Success Publications

ADVISORY BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS (ABFEs)

Erie County Flood Risk Review Meeting. January 18, 2018

Floodplain Management 101. Mississippi Emergency Management Agency Floodplain Management Bureau

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

FINANCING MITIGATION: A ROLE FOR LINKING RISK REDUCTION AND RISK TRANSFER. Carolyn Kousky Wharton Risk Center University of Pennsylvania

Vision to Action: Creating and Using a Flood Risk Assessment for Identifying Mitigation Options

Short Course on Floodplain Management

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

State of Vermont FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT WORK PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. Five-Year Floodplain Management Work Plan

Interagency Nonstructural Flood Risk Management Workshop. Carey Johnson Kentucky Division of Water

AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 50: FLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Public Meeting Impact of Hurricane Irma on Central Beach

G318 Local Mitigation Planning Workshop. Module 2: Risk Assessment. Visual 2.0

Sea Level Rise and the NFIP

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT. MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT. MUNICIPAL PROFILE

In 1993, spring came in like a lion, but refused

Federal Emergency Management Agency

Mitigation 101. KAMM Regional Training. February March Esther White, Speaker

Federal Flood Insurance Changes (National Flood Insurance Program NFIP)

University Drive Flood Risk Management Project Phase I 58 th Ave S to 500 S of 64 th Ave S City of Fargo Project FM-15-C1

FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT PLAN 2015 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT

10526 Bermuda Isle Dr. Tampa, FL 33647

Truckloads (at 25 tons/truck) of building debris 90

This survey is expected to take approximately 20 minutes and must be completed in one session.

DES MOINES CITY OF TWO RIVERS. Flooding Risk & Impact to Development

CITY OF VESTAVIA HILLS

INTRODUCTION 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING 1.2 PLANNING REQUIREMENTS Local Mitigation Plans

Key Fundamentals of Flood Insurance in the NFIP!

Flood Risk Review and Resilience Meeting: Allegheny County

Georgia Flood M.A.P. Program Risk MAP Plenary Session GAFM 2011

Floodplain Management Plan State of Utah

Flood Plain Management Services (FPMS) Program

Hazard Mitigation Overview

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Findings/Debrief Meeting September 9, CDOT R4 Headquarters Big Thompson Conference Room W 10 th St. Greeley, CO 80634

Action Items for Flood Risk Management on Wildcat Creek Interagency success with floodplain management plans and flood forecast inundation maps

TS18 Mitigation Grant Application and Benefit Cost Analysis Development - Support Documentation - Governor s Hurricane Conference 2017

Flood Analysis Memo. 629 Orangewood Dr. Dunedin, FL BFE = 21 ft

10526 Bermuda Isle Dr. Tampa, FL 33647

Chapter 7 Appendix B: National Flood Insurance Program Summary for Kaua'i County, 2015 Update

Bucks County, PA Flood Risk Review Meeting. November 2014

Use of FEMA Non regulatory Flood Risk Products in Planning

Durham County Preliminary Flood Hazard Data Public Meeting. July 28, 2016

Cumberland County, NJ. Risk MAP Project Status Update April 22, 2013

9.2 ALBURTIS BOROUGH. This section presents the jurisdictional annex for Alburtis Borough. A. HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT

ASFPM Update OUR CHALLENGE. Floods are 'acts of God,' but flood losses are largely acts of man. Fall, 2016

Kevin Wagner Maryland Department of the Environment

Hazard Mitigation Grants. Technical Assistance Session Middlesex County, NJ December 7, 2011

National Flood Insurance Program and Biggert-Waters 2012

This survey is expected to take approximately 20 minutes and must be completed in one session.

Planning Commission April 19, 2017 Erin Cooper, Floodplain Specialist Varda Blum, Floodplain Program Manger

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Changes Coming to the National Flood Insurance Program What to Expect. Impact of changes to the NFIP under Section 205 of the Biggert-Waters Act

IN THIS ISSUE SPRING FLOODS. Black River, Pocahontas, Arkansas

MSD Quick Buy Program. Lori Rafferty, PE, CFM

Flood Risk in the Schuylkill Watershed. Planning for Resilient Communities

Post Disaster Floodplain Administrator Response 2 Hours

CDBG-DR, BW-12, CRS and Dauphin County, PA: What do they have in common? 2015 FMA Annual Conference

FEMA s Flood Map Modernization Preparing for FY09 and Beyond: Integrated Flood Data Update, Risk Assessment, and Mitigation Planning

Pinellas County Local Mitigation Strategy Progress Report

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

M1015 Lord Hoole Fema 6/2012

210 W Canal Dr Palm Harbor, FL 34684

Historic Structures in the Floodplain

Mitigation Measures: Sound Investments in Disaster Recovery

Flood Risk Management and Nonstructural Flood Risk Adaptive Measures

Using GISWeb to Determine Your Property s Flood Zone

Public Meeting No. 2 Flood Mitigation Strategies for Central Beach

9.10 HEIDELBERG TOWNSHIP

Floodplain Development Permit Application

ASFPM Annual National Conference 2015 Atlanta, GA, John E. Bourdeau Jr: FEMA Region 6, Risk Analysis Branch

ASFPM Partnerships for Statewide Mitigation Actions. Alicia Williams GIS and HMP Section Manager, Amec Foster Wheeler June 2016

Justification for Floodplain Regulatory Standards in Illinois

Flood Insurance vs. Disaster Assistance. Janice Mitchell FEMA, Region

Volusia County Floodplain Management Plan 2012

Name Title/ Department Address Telephone Fax

9.28 Village of New Berlin

The New Maryland Model Floodplain Management Ordinance

Transcription:

ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT AND FLOOD MITIGATION CITY OF BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA EDWIN REVELL, CFM FLOOD PLAIN ADMINISTRATOR DENISE PRUITT, CFM PROJECT PLANNER

PRESENTATION OUTLINE 1. BACKGROUND/LOCATION 2. FLOODPLAIN PROGRAM PROFILE 3. PROGRAM PERFORMANCE MEASURES 4. LOSS AVOIDANCE ANALYSIS APPLICATION 5. CONCLUSIONS 6. QUESTIONS/DISCUSSIONS

FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT/MITIGATION PROGRAM PROFILE JOINED NFIP MARCH 1981 JOINED CRS PROGRAM OCT 1994 (CRS CLASS 6) CONSTRUCTED VILLAGE CREEK LINEAR PARK PHASE I 1995 AMENDED FLOODPLAIN ORDINANCE MARCH 95 ADOPTED COUNTY-WIDE ALL NATURAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN APRIL 2004 ADOPTED CITY-WIDE FLOOD MITIGATION/STORWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN OCTOBER 2004 PLAN IMPLEMENTATION (PUBLIC OUTREACH PROGRAM & FEMA FLOOD MITIGATION PROJECTS ($8.5 MILLION))

FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT PROGRAM OBJECTIVES MINIMIZE NEGATIVE IMPACTS OF FLOODING TO EXISTING/PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT PROVIDE PUBLIC AWARENESS INFORMATION AND ASSISTANCE TO ALL AFFECTED AND INVOLVED PARTIES GET PROPERTIES WITH MOST SEVERE FLOODING OUT OF HARMS WAY THROUGH PROPERTY BUYOUTS REUSE ACQUIRED LAND AS COMMUNITY ASSETS/AMENITIES REDUCE FLOOD INSURANCE COSTS TO FLOOD POLICY HOLDERS REDUCE COSTS & ENHANCE QUALITY

FLOOD MITIGATION BUYOUT PROJECTS USACE BUYOUTS 1988-1992 (~800 PROPERTIES) FEMA VILLAGE CREEK BUYOUTS 1996-2000 (255 PROPERTIES) FMA REPETITIVE LOSS PROPERTIES PROJECTS 2001-2004 2003 PDM VALLEY & VILLAGE CREEK BUYOUTS (135 PROPERTIES) 2003 HMGP FLOODWAY BUYOUTS (46 PROPERTIES) 2005 PDM VALLEY & VILLAGE CREEK BUYOUTS (108 PROPERTIES) 2005 HMGP VILLAGE, VALLEY, FIVE MILE CREEK BUYOUTS (37 PROPERTIES)

FLOOD MITIGATION BUYOUT PROJECTS (CONT D) ACQUIRED OVER 1100 FLOODPLAIN PROPERTIES TO DATE 1400 PROPERTIES IF 2005 BUYOUT PROJECTS ARE FUNDED SPENT OVER $48 MILLION IN PROPERTY BUYOUTS TO DATE $56 MILLION IF 2005 BUYOUT PROJECTS ARE FUNDED

KEY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE MEASURES CRS PROGRAM--REDUCTION IN FLOOD INSURANCE COSTS TO POLICY HOLDERS (COST SAVINGS OF $170,000/YEAR) FLOOD MITIGATION PROJECTS--REMOVAL & RELOCATION OF OVER 1100 FLOODPLAIN PROPERTIES FLOOD MITIGATION PROJECTS---REDUCTION IN FLOOD MITIGATION LOSSES DUE TO LESS RESPONSE & RECOVERY AND PROPERTY MITIGATION ACTIONS BUT HOW DO WE MEASURE COST SAVINGS FROM PAST FLOOD MITIGATION PROJECTS?

LOSS AVOIDANCE ANALYSIS FOR BIRMINGHAM, AL LOSSES AVOIDED ANALYSIS: AN APPROACH FOR QUANTIFYING THE DIRECT COST SAVINGS FROM IMPLEMENTED FLOOD MITIGATION PROJECTS. (QUANTIFY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE) PAST APPLICATION: LOSSES AVOIDED IN BIRMINGHAM, AL ANALYSIS OF 735 ACQUISITIONS ON VILLAGE CREEK (518-USACE/217-FEMA BUYOUTS) CURRENT APPLICATION: EXTENDED LOSSES AVOIDED ANALYSIS FOR FEMA BUYOUTS

LOSS AVOIDANCE ANALYSIS FOR BIRMINGHAM, AL CONT. PAST APPLICATION 518 PROPERTIES EVALUATED USING 5 FLOOD EVENTS (1996-2000) USACE BUYOUT 217 PROPERTIES EVALUATED USING 2 FLOOD EVENTS (1999, 2000) FEMA BUYOUT USACE-$36 MILLION.... $23.4 MILLION (FED); $12.6 MILLION (CITY) FEMA-$7 MILLION $5.3 MILLION (FED), $1.7 MILLION (CITY) USACE TOTAL LOSSES AVOIDED = $60 MILLION OR 166 % OF TOTAL ACQUISITION COSTS FEMA TOTAL LOSSES AVOIDED = $3.4 MILLION OR 48% OF TOTAL ACQUISITION COSTS

LOSS AVOIDANCE ANALYSIS FOR BIRMINGHAM, AL CONT. CURRENT APPLICATION STUDY OBJECTIVE: WHAT S THE CURRENT COST SAVINGS FOR FEMA BUYOUT PROJECT? STUDY ASSUMPTIONS: ECONOMIC ASSUMPTION/DEPTH- DAMAGE DATA ASSUMPTIONS STUDY APPROACH: DATA COLLECTION & TOTAL ACQUISITION COST & LOSSES AVOIDED CALCULATIONS STUDY RESULTS: 2 STORM EVENTS LOSSES AVOIDED = $3.4 MILLION WHAT S LOSSES AVOIDED BASED ON 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 STORM EVENTS?????

STUDY AREA

KEY STUDY ASSUMPTIONS FLOOD EVENTS ARE INDEPENDENT CRAWL SPACE STRUCTURES WITH UTILITIES FIA DEPTH DAMAGE FUNCTION ARE APPLICABLE CONTENT VALUE IS APPROXIMATELY 30% OF PROPERTY VALUE

STUDY APPROACH DATA COLLECTION: PROJECT MITIGATION COSTS, VULNERABILITY, FLOOD HAZARD, & BUILDING DATA Flood Event Date Flood Event Frequency Flood Event Elevation June 1999 5 to10 Year 519 Feet March 2000 10 to 25 Year 520 Feet April 2001 5 to 10 Year 519 Feet September 2001 5 Year 518.5 Feet May 2003 10 Year 519.5 Feet February 2004 September 2004 10 to 25 Year 520.5 Feet 10 Year 519.5 Feet Number of Properties Finished Floor Elevation Total Property Value 1 516 Feet $19,921 23 517 Feet $788,104 70 518 Feet $2,862,450 75 519 Feet $3,396,051 25 520 Feet $1,146,216 13 521 Feet $458,266 5 522 Feet $140,200 5 523 Feet $133,652 217 $8,944,860

STUDY APPROACH CONT. DATA COMPUTATIONS: TOTAL PROJECT ACQUISITION COSTS Property Type Tenant Occupied Homes Formulae for Total Acquisition Cost Calculation Purchase price + Relocation cost + Appraisal fee + Title fee + Legal fee + Demolition cost + Project management fee

STUDY APPROACH CONT. DATA COMPUTATIONS: TOTAL LOSSES AVOIDED Formulae for Losses Avoided Calculation Damage to structure + Damage to contents + Displacement cost From Depth Damage Table = (Bldg DDF) x (Property Value) = (Content DDF) x (Content Value) = ($500 per month) x (Displacement Period) Note: DDF = Depth Damage Function

STUDY APPROACH CONT. Flood Depth-Damage Table Used (For One-story Homes w/raised First Floor) Flood Depth (ft) Bldg (DDF) Contents (DDF) Displacement (days) -2 6% 0% 0-1 6% 0% 0 0 13% 14% 0 1 16% 21% 62 2 23% 33% 126 3 27% 41% 166 4 35% 44% 182 5 45% 45% 365 Sample Flood Elevation 520 ft First Floor Elevation 518 ft Flood Depth 2 ft Building DDF 23% Contents DDF 33% Displacement Period 126 days

RESULTS Losses Avoided By Finished Floor Elevation (FFE) Number of Properties Finished Floor Elevation (FFE) Property Value (Structure & Contents) Total Acquisition Cost Total Losses Avoided 1 516 Feet $19,921 $15,313 $67,911 23 517 Feet $788,104 $605,894 $1,882,256 70 518 Feet $2,862,450 $2,201,579 $4,870,694 75 519 Feet $3,396,051 $2,643,708 $3,835,352 25 520 Feet $1,146,216 $886,250 $661,899 13 521 Feet $458,266 $447,091 $181,015 5 522 Feet $140,200 $136,808 $16,824 5 523 Feet $133,652 $133,652 $0 217 $8,944,860 $7,070,295 $11,515,949

RESULTS CONT. Losses Avoided by Finished Floor Elevation 6% 2% 0% 1% 0% 16% 33% 42% 516ft 517 518 519 520 521 522 523ft

RESULTS CONT. Average Loss Avoidance By FFE $90,000 $80,000 Average Loss Avoidance $70,000 $60,000 $50,000 $40,000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 $0 516ft 517 518 519 520 521 522 523ft Series1 $67,911 $81,849 $69,581 $51,138 $26,476 $13,924 $3,365 $0 Finished Floor Elevation (FFE) feet

RESULTS CONT. Event & Cumulative Losses Avoided $14,000,000 $12,000,000 $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 Event Losses Avoided Cumulative Losses Avoided $0 Jun-99 Apr-01 May-03 Sep-04

CUMULATIVE LOSSES AVOIDED Total Project Cost..$7,070,295 Federal Cost...$5,302,721 City Cost.$1,767,574 Flood Event Losses Avoided Cumulative Losses Avoided Observations June 1999 $1,352,914 $1,352,914 77 % of City Cost March 2000 $2,038,498 $3,391,412 Twice City Cost Half of TP Cost April 2001 $1,352,914 $4,744,326 89% of Fed Cost >2.5 City Cost September 2001 $1,036,529 $5,780,855 Exceeds Fed Cost 82% of TP Cost May 2003 $1,691,502 $7,472,357 Exceeds TP Cost February 2004 $2,352,090 $9,824,447 5.5 City Cost September 2004 $1,691,502 $11,515,949 1.5 TP Cost Twice Fed Cost 6.5 City Cost

CONCLUSIONS ANNUAL LOSS AVOIDANCE FOR PERIOD EXAMINED IS $2.3 MILLION PER YEAR EVENT MEAN LOSS AVOIDANCE FOR PERIOD EXAMINED IS $1.65 MILLION PER EVENT COST SAVINGS FROM PAST FEMA FLOOD BUYOUT PROJECT PROVIDED 10 TO 14 TIMES MORE ANNUAL SAVINGS THAN ANNUAL CRS FLOOD INSURANCE SAVINGS ($170,000)

FUTURE INTERESTS/ OPPORTUNITIES PERFORM LOSS AVOIDANCE ANALYSIS FOR ALL FEMA BUYOUT PROJECTS EXPLORE USE OF LOSS AVOIDANCE ANALYSIS FOR NON-BUYOUT FLOOD MITIGATION PROJECTS AND FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES SEEK TO DEVELOP AS FEMA SUCCESS STORY SEEK TO WORK WITH AEMA & FEMA TO FURTHER DEVELOP LOSS AVOIDANCE ANALYSIS METHODS FOR USE BY ALL CONTINUE TO REPORT RESULTS AS A MEASURE OF PROGRAM PERFORMANCE TO LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL STAKEHOLDERS

QUESTIONS/DISCUSSIONS Contact Information EDWIN REVELL, FLOODPLAIN ADMINISTRATOR PLANNING, ENGINEERING & PERMITS (205-254-2470) or Edwin.Revell@birminghamal.gov DENISE PRUITT, PROJECT PLANNER PLANNING, ENGINEERING & PERMITS (205-254-2022) or Denise.Pruitt@birminghamal.gov www.birminghamal.gov