Highlights of the Financial Monitoring Report. for Financial Services Agency July 2015

Similar documents
Financial System Report Annex Series. inancial ystem eport. Annex. Financial Results of Japan s Banks for Fiscal 2016

Bank of Japan March 2007

Financial Highlights under Japanese GAAP for 3rd Quarter of Fiscal Year Ending March 31, 2018

Strategic Directions and Priorities

Star Asia Investment Corporation

Financial Innovation and Global Market Turmoil ~Preparing for the Post-Subprime World of Finance~

Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.

FSA Newsletter April 2009

News Release Survey on Privately Placed Real Estate Funds in Japan July 2012 Results

Negative Interest Rate Policy and Sophistication of Risk Control

inancial ystem eport Bank of Japan

Haruhiko Kuroda: Quantitative and qualitative monetary easing and the financial system toward realisation of a vigorous financial system

Financial Results for the Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2018

Economic Monthly [Japan]

CVA Risk Management Working Group Report -Towards the Introduction of Market-based CVA-

Invesco Office J-REIT Investment Corporation (3298)

Notice concerning Debt Financing. Invincible Investment Corporation ( INV ) has determined to obtain new debt financing. Details are as follows.

ZENKOKU HOSHO Co., Ltd.

SUMITOMO MITSUI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.

1. Consolidated Financial Results for the First Half of Fiscal Year 2017 (April 1, September 30, 2017)

The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ

The total of major banks, regional banks, and shinkin banks covered in this Report is as follows (as at September 30, 2017).

Basel III Disclosure (Consolidated)

2QFY2017 Financial Summary

Basel II and Recent Market Development

Summary of Financial Results for Fiscal 2017 <Under Japanese GAAP> May 15, 2018

Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. (SMFG)

Shareholders equity ratio Million yen Million yen % As of June 30, ,447 89, As of March 31, ,352 90,

ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURE FOR THE FINANCIAL RESULTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 (Unaudited)

Aozora Reports Net Income of 46.3 Billion for FY2011; Increased 41.1% compared to previous year; Forecast for FY2012

inancial ystem eport Bank of Japan

Interim Consolidated Summary Report <under US GAAP> For the Fiscal Year Ending March 31, 2018

System for Dissemination of Reference Statistical Prices. (Yields) for OTC Bond Transactions

The Group s Medium-term Management Plan Covering Fiscal Years 2015 to 2017

The Final Report (Framework) of the Working Group concerning Review of Fails Practice for Bond Trading

3QFY2017 Financial Summary

2QFY2018 Financial Summary

Financial Results for the Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2004

Overview 1. Economy and Market Trends 3. 1 Economic Overview 3. 2 Stock Market 6. 3 Bond Market 9. 4 Investment Trusts Derivative Market 13

Medium-term Management Plan (Fiscal Year 2019/3 to Fiscal Year 2021/3)

Aozora Reports Interim Net Income of 22.6 Billion - Increased 59.1% compared to previous year -

To Our Shareholders, Employees and Customers

Aozora Reports 50% Increase in First Quarter Earnings; Net Income of 11.0 Billion Yen; ~ Positive Direction Continues ~

CONTENTS FACT BOOK 2014 Overview Ⅰ Economy and Market Trends Ⅱ Securities Industry Overview Statistical Data

Aozora Reports Net Income of 32.8 Billion; Forecasts for FY2011

Revision of Earnings and Dividends Forecasts for the Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2009

Financial and Economic Environment

Financial Information for the 1st Quarter of the Fiscal Year Ending March 31, 2005

Economic Monthly [Japan]

Investor Presentation

Unaudited Quarterly Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the nine months ended December 31, 2017

Notice regarding the making of SMBC Friend Securities into a wholly-owned subsidiary of SMFG

Aozora Reports Net Income of 10.4 Billion for the First Three Months of FY Steady progress of 26.1% towards the full-year forecast -

SUMITOMO MITSUI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

Resona Holdings, Inc. Consolidated Financial Results for Fiscal Year 2016 (April 1, March 31, 2017/ Unaudited) <under Japanese GAAP>

Financial Summary for the 1st Half of Fiscal Year November 21, 2018

Financial Statements for the Second Quarter of Fiscal 2008 (Six months ended September 30, 2008) <under Japanese GAAP>

Financial Results for the Six Months Ended September 30, ZENKOKU HOSHO Co., Ltd. November 2017

Foreign Capital Investment in Korea and Issues in Asian Capital Markets. Korea Institute of Finance

Semi-annual Securities Report

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group

Notice of Capital and Business Partnership and Private Placement of New Shares

ORIX JREIT Announces New Debt Financing

2. Dividends on Common Stock Dividends per Share 1st Quarter-end Quarter-end Quarter-end Year-end. January 31, 2018

Footnotes [page 1] The Basic Discount Rates and Basic Loan Rates [page 6] <Memo> Amount and Number of Banknotes Issued

Summary October 2016 Bank of Japan

Results for the Fiscal Year Ended March May 18, 2017

Outlook for the Japanese Economy in 2007

1 Economic Overview. Securities Market in 2009

Summary of Financial Results for the First Quarter of Fiscal 2017 Under Japanese GAAP. July 31, 2017

Financial Results for FY2012 & Business Plan. May 2013

Consolidated Financial Information <consistent with Japanese GAAP> For the nine months ended December 31, (Reference) For the fiscal

Impacts of interest rate environment on Japanese insurance sector

Financial Results. Fiscal Year 3/2013 -Supplementary Information- Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation

Aozora Reports Net Income of 34.2 billion for the First Nine Months of FY2014

Disclosure of European Embedded Value as of September 30, 2015

(Summary) 2. Necessity of Reorganizing J-REITs through Mergers and Other Measures

SMFG s Management Strategy

Financial Results for the Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2015

Aozora Reports Net Earnings of 43.1 billion for FY2017, 100% of Forecast; Announces FY2017 Dividend Payment, FY2018 Earnings and Dividend Forecast

Announcement of New Medium-term Management Plan

Semi-annual Securities Report

Japan Economic Monthly

Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. (SMFG) Consolidated Financial Results for the Nine Months Ended December 31, 2017 <Under Japanese GAAP>

Financial Results for the Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2016

Economic Monthly [Japan]

Consolidated Financial Results April 1, 2012 December 31, 2012

Basel III Disclosure FISCAL 2015

Summary of Financial Results for the Third Quarter of Fiscal 2018 Under Japanese GAAP. January 31, 2019

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group

Financial Results for the First half of FY2017 Appendix

Financial Results in FY2003 & Management Policies and Strategies. June 2, 2004 Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group

Survey on Private Real Estate Funds in Japan

Single Stock Options: A Vibrant Sector of the Japanese Market. March, 2014 Japan Exchange Group

Financial Highlights under Japanese GAAP for Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2018

Financial and Operation Review

Management Strategy. Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. February & March 2018

Japan Securities Dealers Association

(P.4) Next is the macro environment in Japan. Although there are both positive and negative factors, generally speaking, the Japanese economy continue

Transcription:

Highlights of the Financial Monitoring Report for 214-215 Financial Services Agency July 215

1. Economic and market environment for financial sectors 2. Business trends of deposit-taking financial institutions 3. Three major bank groups 4. Regional banks 5. Roles of boards of directors 6. Issues of investment managers Objective To publish the main results and challenges of financial monitoring from July 214 to June 215 based on the FSA s Financial Monitoring Policy (announced in 214). Outline 7. Issues of sales of investment trusts 8. Effective cyber security measures This translation is only for reference purposes. In cases where there are any differences between this translation and the original highlights in Japanese, the latter shall prevail. 1

1. Economic and market environment for financial sectors The global economy is recovering, mainly in advanced countries. The economic growth rate is lower than the rate before the Lehman Crisis. The price of risk assets is rising under the global low interest rate. Due to changes in market structure, liquidity in the bond market became lower. Volatility of asset prices, which have been decreasing, is now undergoing a slightly upward trend. 4 3 (%) Trend of interest rates of 1-year government bonds Japan Germany US 225 175 Trend of stock prices Japan (Nikkei 225) US (DJI) Germany (DAX) 1 8 (%) Volatility of bond futures Japan US Germany 6 2 125 4 1 75 2 14/1 14/4 14/7 14/1 15/1 15/4 Source: Bloomberg 25 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 (year) Source: Bloomberg 12/3 12/9 13/3 13/9 14/3 14/9 15/3 Source: Bloomberg As some advanced countries move toward normalization of monetary policies, particular attention should be paid to further rises in market volatility and increases of debt in emerging countries. We also need to pay attention to unstable factors such as the debt crisis in Greece and geopolitical risks. 2

Since the government and the Bank of Japan are taking holistic approaches to overcome deflation, the Japanese economy is recovering gradually. Interest rates of JGBs remain low, but volatility has temporarily shown a rise. The upward trend is continuing in the stock market as a result of better financial performance of enterprises and on-balance buying by trust banks/overseas investors. The price and transaction volume of real estate are growing, especially in the Tokyo market. Loans for the real estate industry are growing modestly. Investment from overseas is also increasing, and we need to continue paying attention to its trend. Purchase and sales of real estate by sectors of buyers J-REIT SPC/private REIT, etc. Real estate, construction Industrial corporation, public corporation, etc. (Hundred million yen) Foreign enterprises, fund, etc. Not identified 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 Source: Urban Research Institute Corporation (year) 2 15 1 5 5 1 (%) Loans for real estate (year-on-year) Real estate industry All industries 5/3 6/3 7/3 8/3 9/3 1/3 11/3 12/3 13/3 14/3 15/3 (End of Month) Note 1: Total loans of banks and shinkin banks in Japan (excluding loans for the Government of Japan) Note 2: Excluding loans for local governments, households, overseas yen loans and domestic loans transferred overseas. Source: BOJ 3

2. Business trends of deposit-taking financial institutions Deposit-taking financial institutions maintain their financial soundness overall. Low credit costs and profits from sales of securities contribute to high net income. Financial results of deposit-taking financial institutions Major banks (Trillion yen) 6. 4. 2.. 2. 4. 6. 6/3 7/3 8/3 9/3 1/3 11/3 12/3 13/3 14/3 15/3 (FY) (Trillion yen) Regional banks 2.5 2. 1.5 1..5..5 1. 1.5 2. 2.5 6/3 7/3 8/3 9/3 1/3 11/3 12/3 13/3 14/3 15/3 (FY) Operating profits from core business Realized gains/losses on bondholdings Realized gains/losses on stockholdings Credit cost Others Net income Source: FSA 4

For major banks and regional banks, JPY interest rate risk remains flat. For shinkin banks and credit cooperatives, average remaining maturity of securities has become longer and interest rate risk has been on a rising trend. Despite the decline in corporate bankruptcies, the rate of allowance for credit losses remains flat overall because some financial institutions are reviewing the policy of allowance for potential risks in the future. Appropriate management of JPY interest rate risk remains important. JPY interest rate risk Rate of allowance for credit losses (Trillion yen) 8 6 Major banks Regional banks Shinkin banks, Credit cooperatives (Trillion yen) 8 6 (Trillion yen) 4 (%) 75 7 Major banks Regional banks 4 2 2 4 2 2 2 65 6 55 4 8/3 9/3 1/3 11/3 12/3 13/3 14/3 15/3 (End of Month) 4 8/3 9/3 1/3 11/3 12/3 13/3 14/3 15/3 (End of Month) 2 8/3 9/3 1/3 11/3 12/3 13/3 14/3 15/3 (End of Month) 5 8/3 9/3 1/3 11/3 12/3 13/3 14/3 15/3 End of Month Loans Securities Deposits Net of Derivatives Net of Other Funding and Investment Total Note: The graphs show the change in net present value on the assumption that the interest rate has shifted upward by one percent in a parallel manner. Source: FSA Note: The rate based on the amount of loans classified in Category III potentially bankrupt borrowers Source: FSA 5

(1) Overseas businesses 3. Three major bank groups The FSA conducted a horizontal review regarding overseas businesses and stock price sensitivity among the three major bank groups. The three major bank groups are expanding their overseas businesses, mainly through foreign currency denominated loans (especially in Asia). In response to rapid growth of foreign currency denominated loans, it is essential for the groups to develop a stable funding capacity and a liquidity risk management for foreign currencies. The three major bank groups should develop global governance, credit risk management and local hires such as compliance officers in line with their overseas business expansions. Profits from overseas businesses Foreign currency denominated loans/deposits 1% 8% 6% 8 7 6 5 4 (Trillion yen) Loans Deposits 4% 2% 15% 15% 17% 2% 27% 33% 3 2 1 % 1/3 11/3 12/3 13/3 14/3 15/3 (FY) Note: Rate of profits from international business to net FG operating profits for MUFG, consolidated net banking business profits for SMFG, and net banking business profits for MHFG Source: Three major bank groups 1/3 11/3 12/3 13/3 14/3 15/3 (FY) Note 1: Foreign loans here refer to average loan balance of global business division for MUFG (total of bank and trust bank), average loan balance of international banking division for SMFG (bank), and average loan balance of international banking division for MHFG (bank). Note 2: Foreign currency denominated deposits here refer to average deposit balance of global business division for MUFG (bank), average foreign deposit balance of internal administration base for SMFG (bank), and average balance of foreign currency denominated customer deposits of internal administration base for MHFG (bank). For SMFG and MHFG, the figures are converted at 1 yen to 1 USD. Source: Three major bank groups 6

Nikkei 225 (yen) (2) Stock market risk Compared to G-SIFIs in Europe and the US, the three major bank groups have a higher rate of shareholdings to equity capital. This means that particular attention needs to be paid to the impact on equity capital due to a decline in the stock price. Currently, soundness of equity capital of the three major bank groups is as sufficient as that of G-SIFIs in Europe and the US, partly due to the net unrealized gains from shareholdings. In the past, economic/market downturns affected financial conditions of financial institutions through a drop in stock price, and restricted sufficient function of financial institutions. (occurrence of procyclicality) It is necessary for the three major bank groups to further strengthen their financial bases especially through reducing the risk of stock price fluctuation in order to be able to adequately respond to the economic/market changes and business support needs of enterprises during hard times. Nikkei 225 and ratio of net assets to total assets 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, Nikkei 225 Ratio of net assets to total assets of city banks (net assets/total assets) 1. 96 98 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 (FY) Source: Bloomberg and Japanese Bankers Association 6. 5. 4. 3. 2. Ratio of net assets to total assets of city banks (%) Judgment of bank lending attitude and ratio of net assets to total assets Judgment of bank lending attitude based on the BOJ's short term economic survey of enterprises (Accommodative at top, severe at bottom) 3 2 1-1 -2 Judgment of bank lending attitude DI (all scales, all industries) Ratio of net assets to total assets of city banks (net assets/total assets) -3 1. 96 98 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 (FY) Source: BOJ and Japanese Bankers Association 6. 5. 4. 3. 2. Ratio of net assets to total assets of city banks (%) Ratio of shareholdings to equity capital (comparison between Japan and Europe / US) Note: Shareholdings (market value) divided by Tier 1 (based on the end of each term) is the ratio of shareholdings to equity capital. Source: published data from each company Common Equity Tier 1 Ratio (comparison between Japan and Europe / US) 12 9 6 3 Three major bank groups Three major bank groups (deducting net unrealized gains on stocks) G-SIFIs in Europe and the US Note1: Common Equity Tier 1 ratio is estimated on the assumption of full implementation of Basel III (at the end of FY 214, excluding some G- SIFIs in Europe and the US) Note2: Common Equity Tier 1 ratio which deducts net unrealized gains on stocks is estimated on the assumption that the net unrealized gains of domestic stocks in the category of available-forsale securities are zero. Source: FSA and published data from each company 7

4. Regional banks (1) Mid- and long-term sustainability of business model Since the Japanese population is predicted to shrink, the FSA monitored regional banks from the aspect of development of the mid- and long-term (5 to 1 years) sustainable business model. Due to low yield from loans, regional banks profitability of lending is declining overall. On the other hand, the influence the securities business of regional banks has on the entire management is increasing. As the interest rate is lowered, loans with relatively high yields tend to be repaid one after another to be replaced with new loans with lower interest rates. Assuming that this trend continues, the ordinary profits of about 2 percent of all the regional banks in the future (fiscal year ending March 218) are calculated to be less than or half of what they are now (fiscal year ending March 214). The extent of the decrease in yield from loans differs depending on banks. Since business models are different, some banks still maintain appropriate interest rates. Trends of yield from loans for regional banks Trends of average contract interest rates on loans and discounts for regional banks Distribution of increase-decrease rate of ordinary profits for regional banks (estimated) 2.% 1.5% 1.%.5%.% 1.88% 1.15% Source: FSA 1.77% 1.6% 1.65%.99% 1.53% 1.44% 1.9% 1.6% 11/3 12/3 13/3 14/3 15/3 Yield from loans (FY) Yield from securities 4.5% 4.% 3.5% 3.% 2.5% 2.% 1.5% 1.%.5% Stock.% 95/4 97/4 99/4 1/4 3/4 5/4 7/4 9/4 11/4 13/4 Source: BOJ Flow (FY) 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 Number of banks 125% 1% 75% 5% 25% % 25% Note: Increase-decrease rate of estimated figures in 218/3 to actual figures in 214/3 Source: FSA 8

Amounts of lending and expenses have a strong correlation. Economies of scale can also be seen. On the other hand, regarding the relationship between amounts of lending and the profitability rates of lending, relatively small-sized banks have a distribution of profitability rates with greater spread. Some banks utilize their business strategies with economies of scale, while other banks utilize their business strategies to clarify the differences between each other using their business models without depending on business expansion. Relationship between loans and expenses in regional banks Relationship between loans and rate of interest income from loans in regional banks Distribution of changes in yield from loans in regional banks (11/3-15/3 1,2 1, Expenses (Hundred million yen) 3.5% 3.% Rate of interest income from loans 45 4 Number of banks 8 6 2.5% 2.% 35 3 25 4 1.5% 1.% 2 15 2 Loans (average balance) 2 4 6 8 1 (Trillion yen).5%.% Loans (average balance) 2 4 6 8 1 (Trillion yen) 1 5.7.6.5.4.3.2 (%P).1 Note: As of the end of March 215 Note: As of the end of March 215 Rate of interest income from loans = Source: FSA (interest income from loans provision for allowance for credit losses write-offs of loans to bankrupt borrowers) / loans Source: FSA Source: FSA 9

(2) Evaluation of customers business potential The FSA reviewed how regional banks considered, provided and supported effective solutions based on an appropriate assessment of companies business profiles and growth potential (evaluation of customers business potential). Regarding the evaluation of customers business potential, some banks have good practices they have been carrying out throughout their organizations with a strong commitment of management, such as developing policies in line with business strategy, establishing control frameworks and sharing with branch employees. (Example 1) A regional bank placed focus not on the achievement of target value but on business operations of each sales branch and established its performance evaluation system. The regional bank made a self-assessment that setting target values could sometimes lead to a business attitude which places importance on short-term profit, rather than providing financial services for customers and understanding customers viewpoints. Some branches focused more on the evaluation of operational process (whether or not branch employees understand their customers business, find customers issues, or provide appropriate solutions). As a result, their target values were also achieved. Given that such initiatives were successfully achieved, the regional bank has decided to do the same thing for all branches. (Example 2) Branch employees recognized the need for the evaluation of customers business potential, and developed methods for evaluation of customers business potential on their own. The regional bank set up a management policy such that they would continue to work together with major regional industries, and branch employees understood the necessity of the evaluation of customers business potential in order to achieve the policy. They have developed methods for an evaluation of customers business potential on their own, as seen below. 1) Branch employees did specific interviews which focused on 1-1 qualitative items when supporting the development of customers business plan. 2) Branch employees conducted simple interviews on qualitative items as part of its customers communication toolset. 3) Branch employees conducted qualitative analysis on an extensive number of relevant companies in major industries that could have a large influence on regional economies. 1

5. Roles of boards of directors With the revised Companies Act and Japan s Corporate Governance Code in mind, the FSA reviewed the composition of the boards of directors in financial institutions and nomination/performance of outside directors. Large financial institutions, mainly the three major bank groups, are taking initiatives to encourage their boards of directors to perform their roles properly. Ensure effective discussions by boards of directors regarding important management matters. Increase the number of outside directors and provide support for outside directors. Enhance effective discussion at the nominating committee where more than half of the members are outside directors (clarification of personnel requirements, and consideration/planning of successors of top management). It is important for regional banks to address the following issues in order to enhance their governance. Tone at the top management to listen carefully to and reflect outside directors opinions. Selection of outside directors who have the expertise, experience and knowledge necessary to overcome management issues. Measures for selection of outside directors through the clarification of roles expected of outside directors or use of outside human networks in local regions where it is strongly understood that there are few personnel to be outside directors. 11

6. Issues of investment managers The FSA reviewed governance, product origination, human resources development, etc., from the viewpoint of whether financial institutions engaged in the investment management business fulfilled their roles and responsibilities (i.e., fiduciary duty) adequately. Many Japanese investment managers were established as affiliated companies of sales companies providing financial services. Therefore, investment managers and such sales companies have strong relationships. Many CEOs, directors and audit committee members* are from affiliated sales companies. A large number of investment trusts were sold through affiliated sales companies. In the process of product origination, sales companies are engaged in research on customers needs and product design. The FSA has observed quite a few cases of provision of investment trusts which are easy for sales companies to sell and obtain high sales commissions. The FSA expects investment managers to ensure independence of their business from affiliated sales companies so as to develop financial products that are truly beneficial for their customers (i.e., appointment of professionals who are familiar with asset management business as members of management, as well as enhancement of checking functions by appointing independent outside directors, etc.). *Note: Audit committee member in this slide indicates kansayaku specified in the Companies Act. 12

7. Issues of sales of investment trusts The FSA reviewed business objectives, performance assessment systems, sales promotion, and sales commission structures of financial institutions from the viewpoint of the development of solicitation and sales to support customers asset building for the mid- and long-term. While many customers prefer safety in their investments, investment trusts with relatively high risk have been selling well. Some sales companies, which focused on consultative sales in order to recommend their customers to diversify their investment, cited balanced-type investment as a wellselling line. While many customers feel dissatisfaction with sales commissions, average sales commission rate has been increasing year by year due to increases in sales of investment trusts with complicated structures. It is necessary for sales companies to review once more whether they provide appropriate services proportional to their fees. Investment trusts that have been selling well in Japan (based on net increase) Trends of sales commission rates in Japan (weighted average balance) Investment strategy Dividend Net increase (1 million yen) Maximum sales commission (tax included) Global equities for certain sectors Semiannually 1,49 3.24% (%) 3. 2.95 2.93 2.95 2.96 Equities for Asia/Oceania Monthly 713 3.24% 2.9 2.86 2.87 Asia REIT Monthly 568 3.78% 2.85 US REIT Monthly 359 3.78% Foreign equities (currency-selectionable) Monthly 349 4.32% Emerging market bonds Monthly 332 3.24% Domestic stocks (with options) Monthly 31 3.24% 2.8 2.75 2.7 2.74 Emerging market equities Monthly 273 3.24% 2.65 Diversified investment to global bonds/stocks Annually 272 3.24% Foreign REIT Monthly 252 3.24% 2.6 1/3 11/3 12/3 13/3 14/3 15/3 (FY) Note 1: Net increase per month as of March 215 Note 2: Investment trusts in this table are publicly offered equity investment trusts (excluding ETFs) that exclude new investment trusts offered for the first time in March Source: QUICK Note: Investment trusts in this graph are publicly offered equity investment trusts (excluding ETFs) Source: QUICK 13

8. Effective cyber security measures Threats in cyberspace have become borderless and rapidly more complex. The FSA reviewed measures for cyber security taken by financial institutions. The three major banks have arranged a set of measures for cyber security, taking into account their research on G-SIFIs proactive approach. It is important to enhance the effectiveness of cyber security measures not only as an individual bank but also as an entire group. For other financial institutions, it is significant to improve the countermeasures against cyber attacks as well as the sharing of information. More specifically, administration according to the criticality of information, Defense-in-Depth (i.e., combination of information security at various stages throughout not only entry but also middle and exit of monitoring), and training of initial response for cyber attacks are important. Since it is becoming harder to prevent cyber attacks, it is necessary to continue addressing the issue under management s proactive initiatives to develop cyber attack countermeasures. 14

Definitions of categories of the financial institutions used in the highlights Deposit-Taking Financial Institutions: Domestic banks, other banks, Citibank Japan, Shinhan Bank Japan, Shinkin Banks, Credit Cooperatives Domestic Banks: City Banks, Regional Banks (First-tier), Second-tier Regional Banks, Trust Banks City Banks: Mizuho Bank, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, Resona Bank, Saitama Resona Bank Major Banks: Mizuho Bank, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, Resona Bank, Mitsubishi UFJ Trust and Banking, Mizuho Trust and Banking, Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Bank, Shinsei Bank, Aozora Bank Three Major Bank Groups: Mizuho Financial Group (MHFG), Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (MUFG), Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group (SMFG) G-SIFIs: G-SIBs (Global Systemically Important Banks) excluding Three Major Bank Groups Regional Banks: Regional Banks (First-tier), Second-tier Regional Banks, Saitama Resona Bank 15