SAFETY OF NAVIGATION CONFERENCE

Similar documents
Risk calculation project

INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION S REGIONAL SENIOR MARITIME ADMINISTRATORS WORKSHOP. Montego Bay, Jamaica February 2013

APPLICATION OF FORMAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT IN THE LEGAL ACTIVITY OF INTERNATIONAL MARITIME

Marine THIS INFORMATION IS INTENDED FOR INSURANCE BROKERS AND OTHER INSURANCE PROFESSIONALS ONLY. Global reach, local service.

Marine Protection Rules Part 143 Shipboard Marine Pollution Emergency Plans for Noxious Liquid Substances

Cowal Gold Project Addendum to the Transport of Hazardous Materials Study

REPORT OF THE MEETING TENTH PROJECT COORDINATION COMMITTEE MEETING UNDER THE COOPERATIVE MECHANISM ON THE STRAITS OF MALACCA AND SINGAPORE

THE 35 TH TRIPARTITE TECHNICAL EXPERTS GROUP (TTEG) MEETING ON THE SAFETY OF NAVIGATION IN THE STRAITS OF MALACCA AND SINGAPORE

YACHTING AUSTRALIA. Club Risk Management Template. A Practical Resource for Clubs and Centres

enavigation IUMI International Union of Marine Insurance The Insurance Perspective

The Standard Club An introduction to P&I. Anna Doumeni Senior Claims Executive

CMP for Special Regs and Safety Issues. 1. INTRODUCTION Purpose Scope Submissions to Australian Sailing:...

FINAL REPORT: VTRA

E-Navigation & Risk Management The Insurance Industry Perspective

Enforcement of international maritime legal instruments

Recommendation for Improving Maritime Transport Safety in the ESCAP

Notice to Mariners No. 71

RISK MANAGEMENT. Budgeting, d) Timing, e) Risk Categories,(RBS) f) 4. EEF. Definitions of risk probability and impact, g) 5. OPA

Rapid Response Damage Assessment. 24/7 Casualty Response

ST. VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES MARINE CASUALTY REPORT

12 October The European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation

Maritime Rules Part 21: Safe Ship Management Systems

Marine Terrorism. A re-evaluation of the risks. Tim Allmark Engineering Manager ABS Consulting Europe & Middle East

Canada s Ship-Source Oil Spill Preparedness and Response

A multi-layered risk estimation routine for strategic planning and operations for the maritime industry

FORMAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT GENERAL CARGO SHIP SAFETY. Report of the FSA Experts Group

Transport Canada Update. CBMU Fall Conference 2018

COMMENTS ON BILL C-64 (AN ACT RESPECTING WRECKS, ABANDONED, DILAPIDATED OR HAZARDOUS VESSELS AND SALVAGE OPERATIONS

RISK EVALUATIONS FOR THE CLASSIFICATION OF MARINE-RELATED FACILITIES

Practical aspects of determining and applying a risk appetite for SMEs

UNMANNED VESSELS LEGAL ASPECTS TO

Risk Management Policy

Part Objective. The rules are made pursuant to sections 386, 387 and 388 of the Maritime Transport Act 1994.

Cost Risk Assessment Building Success and Avoiding Surprises Ken L. Smith, PE, CVS

Procedure: Risk management

MARINE INSURANCE SOLUTIONS SPECIALTY

ALL SHIPOWNERS, OPERATORS, MASTERS AND OFFICERS OF MERCHANT SHIPS AND AUTHORIZED CLASSIFICATION SOCIETIES.

Risk analysis as an integrated operational and legal instrument with respect to the safety of maritime traffic

Kidsafe NSW Risk Management Plan. August 2014

RISK MANAGEMENT ON USACE CIVIL WORKS PROJECTS

IMO SLF 53 Agenda Preview

IMO FORMAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT. Report of the FSA Experts Group

APPENDIX 21 EFFECTS ON MARINE SPILL RISK

Scouting Ireland Risk Management Framework

IMO WORK PROGRAMME. Damage stability verification of oil, chemical and gas tankers

California Department of Transportation(Caltrans)

Overview of the Marine Services Fees Project. July 3, 2013

What do Coin Tosses, Decision Making under Uncertainty, The VTRA 2010 and Average Return Time Uncertainty have in common?

HNS TANKER OWNER S DUTY IN JAPAN S INCE APRIL 1 ST, Maritime Disaster Prevention

General Average - an introduction

TIDE TABLES FOR THE PORT OF WARRENPOINT (CARLINGFORD LOUGH)

ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT (ERM) The Conceptual Framework

MARINE SAFETY SAFETY AND INTERVENTION RELATED TO PETROLEUM PRODUCT TRANSPORT

Risk Management Framework

REGULATION ON IMPLEMENTATION OF INTERNATIONAL SAFETY MANAGEMENT CODE FOR TURKISH FLAGGED VESSELS AND THEIR MANAGEMENT COMPANIES PART ONE

Chapter 7: Risk. Incorporating risk management. What is risk and risk management?

The causes of maritime accidents in the period

Common Safety Methods CSM

AN OVERVIEW OF THE HNS CONVENTION

REPORT OF THE MINISTRY OF HOUSING AND LANDS REPUBLIC OF MAURITIUS 14 TH NORTH INDIAN OCEAN HYDROGRAPHIC COMMISSION

Formal Safety Assessment

FISHERIES MEASURES FOR MARINE NATURA 2000 SITES A consistent approach to requests for fisheries management measures under the Common Fisheries Policy

JUNEAU RIM PROGRAM SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT APRIL 11, 2017

IMO ANY OTHER BUSINESS. FSA Study on ECDIS/ENCs: Details on Risk Assessments and Cost Benefit Assessments. Submitted by Denmark and Norway

China s 2009 Regulation on the Prevention and

IMO REVIEW OF RESOLUTIONS A.744(18) AND A.746(18) Note by Norway

ADMINISTRATIVE ARRANGEMENT. between THE MINISTER XXXXXXXXXX OF XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX. and XXXXXXX IN THE FIELD OF HYDROGRAPHY AND NAUTICAL CARTOGRAPHY

NETWORK OF DANUBE WATERWAY ADMINISTRATIONS South-East European Transnational Cooperation Programme STATUS QUO REPORT ON WATERWAY ADMINISTRATION

SCAF Workshop Integrated Cost and Schedule Risk Analysis. Tuesday 15th November 2016 The BAWA Centre, Filton, Bristol

MARITIME ZONES ACT 2012

Risk Management Procedure

LP News. The key to safe ECDIS operation Part 3: Legal implications UK P&I CLUB

DGE 2 EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 22 November 2017 (OR. en) 2016/0050 (COD) PE-CONS 42/17 TRANS 307 MAR 145 EDUC 310 SOC 525 ETS 52 MI 541 CODEC 1192

Exam Spring 2009: Marine Insurance

Legal Briefing. Chinese marine pollution laws JULY 2010 MARINE POLLUTION

LAURENTIAN PILOTAGE AUTHORITY SUMMARY OF THE CORPORATE PLAN SUMMARY OF THE OPERATING BUDGET SUMMARY OF THE CAPITAL BUDGET

Application of risk-based decision making on planning VTS

GAC Ras Al Khaimah Professional shipping and logistics support at the heart of Ras Al Khaimah s business community

2. Definitions 2.1 For the purpose of these Instructions, unless expressly provided otherwise:

The Nairobi International Convention on the Removal of Wrecks. Dr. Matthew Attard GANADO ADVOCATES

COORDINATING WORKING PARTY ON FISHERY STATISTICS. Twenty-third Session. Hobart, Tasmania February 2010 REVIEW OF FISHERY STATISTICS

GOVERNMENT OF RAS AL KHAIMAH RAK PORTS PILOTAGE DIRECTIONS RAK PORTS INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

A8-0338/131. Gesine Meissner Recognition of professional qualifications in inland navigation COM(2016)0082 C8-0061/ /0050(COD)

Risk Management Strategy January NHS Education for Scotland RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY

Table of Contents Advantages Disadvantages/Limitations Sources of additional information. Standards, textbooks & web-sites.

PROTECTION AND PRESERVATION OF THE MARINE ENVIRONMENT

QUALITY POLICY. All Company employees are responsible for implementing the Company s Quality Policy.

SOFTWARE RADIO TECHNOLOGY PLC ( SRT or the Company ) (AIM: SRT) FINAL RESULTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2015

ANNUAL REPORT 2013/14

MONTENEGRO. Enhanced control and management of fisheries INSTRUMENT FOR PRE-ACCESSION ASSISTANCE (IPA II)

REPUBLIC OF LIBERIA BUREAU OF MARITIME AFFAIRS

E14 RISK MANAGEMENT FOR RAILWAY OPERATIONS

RISK ASSESSMENT IN SHIP OPERATIONS

Risk Management User Guide. Prepared By: Neville Turbit Version Feb /01/2009 Risk Management User Guide Page 1 of 36

FORMAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT, INCLUDING GENERAL CARGO SHIP SAFETY. Reporting of Accidents and Incidents

Group of Experts on Maritime Narcotrafficking

2 nd Co-operation Forum under the Co-operative Mechanism on the 15 October 2009 Straits of Malacca and Singapore October 2009

Integrating Contract Risk with Schedule and Cost Estimates

STANDARDISATION OF RISK ASSESSMENT PROCESS BY MODIFYING THE RISK MATRIX

EBRD s Environmental & Social (E&S) Risk Management Procedures for Insurance

Transcription:

SAFETY OF NAVIGATION CONFERENCE Cape Town, South Africa, 29 August 2016 Session 2-4: IALA Risk Management Tools 28/08/2016

Coastal State Obligations SOLAS V/12-13 to Provide Aids to Navigation in accordance with Traffic Volume and Degree of Risk 2

How to measure Traffic Volume? How to Quantify Risk? What are the major risk contributions? Where in our waterway are these risks located? What can we do to mitigate the risk? How much does waterway geometry matter? What Aids to Navigation are most effective? Do Visual Aids really make any difference? What if traffic volume doubles? What if we get a 20% increase in tankers? 3

What is Risk? Any activity that might lead to an unwanted outcome involves risk.examples? Driving to work Smoking Navigation at sea Risks are unwanted events in the future that can be avoided or reduced or mitigated (lessen the severity) driving within speed limits not smoking VTS and/or improved aids to navigation 4

Definition of Risk Risk is the chance of injury or loss defined as a measure of probability or likelihood and severity or impact on health, property or the environment 5

RISK? 6

Basic Risk Equation R = P C R = Risk P = Probability that undesired incident occurs C = Consequences of undesired incident 7

IALA Risk Management Toolbox: Qualitative Tool - PAWSA Simulation Tools Quantitative Tool IWRAP (Project) - SQUART Different approaches to model waterways in terms of incident probability and risk 8

The IALA Risk Management Tools PAWSA Port and Waterway Safety Assessment tool 28/08/2016 Cape Town, 29 August 2016 Risk Management Tools 9 - JM

Port and Waterway Safety Assessment (PAWSA) Tool Developed by US Coast Guard to: Identify major waterway hazards Estimate risk levels and consequences Evaluate possible risk reduction (mitigation) measures Prepare for implementation of selected measures Expert opinion of groups of stakeholders (2 day workshop) follow the PAWSA Workshop Guide Based on 7 Excel TM Workbooks to determine whether existing risks are: Acceptable until circumstances change Not acceptable but risk control options identified Not acceptable and more data required 10

PAWSA : Objective The purpose of PAWSA is to provide Authorities and waterway communities with an effective tool to evaluate risk and work toward long term solutions tailored to local circumstances. The assessment should identify solutions that are cost effective and meet the needs of waterway users and stakeholders. 11

PAWSA: the risk model Since risk is defined as the product of the probability of a casualty by its consequences R = P x C the Waterway Risk Model includes variables dealing with both the causes of waterway casualties and their effects. 12

PAWSA in brief Basically, it is a two day meeting (16 hours) of experts representative of all stakeholders/users of a waterway to discuss its safety aspect and the associated risks, and the way to improve. Exchanges of opinions between experts. Need to be organised: the facilitator. 6 categories and 4 factors, i.e. 24 risk factors. Use of matrix and rating assessment from 1 to 9 analyzed with the Excel workbook (PAWSA software). / 13

14 Lisbon Seminar 2-3 May 2016.jc

TEAM EXPERTISE Waterway User Stakeholder Regulator 15 Lisbon Seminar 2-3 May

PAWSA in brief / There are five steps («books») 1 evaluation of the experts 2 evaluation of the estimation of risks 3 evaluation of the waterway 4 evaluation of the waterway with the measures already adopted 5 proposal and evaluation of new measures. 16

PAWSA PROCESS Book 1: Team Expertise Establish weighting factors. Book 2: Risk Factor Rating Scales Provide input for aggregate risk measuring scales. Book 3: Baseline Risk Levels Establish risk levels and identify locations. Book 4: Mitigation Effectiveness Assess effectiveness of current mitigations. Book 5: Additional Mitigations Assess effectiveness of potential mitigations. PAWSA Day One PAWSA Day Two 17 Lisbon Seminar 2-3 May

PAWSA in brief The main difficulties of the exercise are the organization (A CD, available to IALA Members, is extremely well done and useful), the choice and availability of the participants, and the facilitator s role. It is an oral procedure, which implies using the local language. How to become a facilitator. The case of Douglas Perkins. 18

AGENDA Day One AM Workshop Overview PAWSA Background Risk Model Definitions Expertise Evaluation Rating Scales Evaluation Day One PM Discuss and Evaluate Waterway Risks Day Two AM Discuss and Evaluate Existing Mitigations Day Two PM Discuss and Evaluate New Risk Mitigations Re-evaluate Expertise Workshop Critique 19 Lisbon Seminar 2-3 May 2016.jc

MITIGATION CATEGORIES Coordination / Planning Improve long-range and/or contingency planning and better coordinate activities / improve dialogue between port stakeholders Voluntary Training Establish / use voluntary programs to educate mariners / boaters in topics related to waterway safety (Rules of the Road, ship/boat handling, etc.) Rules & Procedures Establish / refine rules, regulations, policies, or procedures (nav rules, pilot rules, standard operating procedures, licensing, required training and education, etc.) Enforcement More actively enforce existing rules / policies (navigation rules, vessel inspection regulations, standards of care, etc.) Nav / Hydro Info Improve navigation and hydrographic information (ports, charts, coast pilots, AIS, tides & current tables, etc.) / 20 Lisbon Seminar 2-3 May 2016.jc

/ MITIGATION CATEGORIES Radio Communications Improve the ability to communicate bridge-to-bridge or shipto-shore (radio reception coverage, signal strength, reduce interference & congestion, etc.) Active Traffic Mgmt Establish/improve a Vessel Traffic Service (info, advice & control) or Vessel Traffic Information Service (information & advice only) Waterway Changes Widen / deepen / straighten the channel and/or improve the aids to navigation (buoys, ranges, lights, DGPS, etc.) Other Actions Risk mitigation measures needed do NOT fall under any of the above strategy categories 21 Lisbon Seminar 2-3 May 2016.jc

PAWSA : end of the session Conclusions Critics by participants PAWSA workshop report Actions : ressources - implementation 22

IALA Risk Management Tool PAWSA The CD is free of charge for IALA Members. They have to give indication for what, where, when they intend to use the model and to undertake to provide the detailed results. However, it is strongly recommended to be trained prior to organize a PAWSA session. A new manual guide will be issue end of 2016. 23

Simulation 24

IALA Guideline on Use of simulators 25

Definition Simulation is the process of designing a model of a real system and conducting experiments with this model for the purpose either of understanding the behaviour of the system or of evaluating various strategies (within the limits imposed by a criterion or set of criteria) for the operation of the system (R.E. Shannon,1975) 26

Different simulation tools are available for design studies and have different capabilities, functionalities and applications : Fast-time simulation Desktop simulation Part-task simulation Full-mission simulation Traffic-flow simulation 28/08/2016 Lisbon Seminar 2-27 3 May

Ship Simulators 28

29

30

31

32

Use of Ship Simulators for: 1. Waterway design and planning 2. AtoN design and planning 33

IALA Waterway Risk Assessment Program IWRAP Mk2 Software tool Quantitative approach Probabilistic algorithm Scenario based 34

IWRAP.. Probability ~ Frequency R = P C 35

The aim of the IWRAP project To provide to IALA members and the maritime world with: Internationally recognized tool, capable of estimating the annual number of collisions and groundings in a specified navigational area. 36

Undesired Incidents - IWRAP Powered Groundings Drifting Groundings Overtaking Collisions Head On Collisions Crossing Collisions Merging Collisions Bend Collisions Area Collisions 37

Basic Methodology X Gnd = N Gnd P C N Gnd = Number of Grounding Candidates P c = Causation Probability X Gnd = Number of Annual Groundings 38

BASIC Methodology Number of Grounding Candidates (Report from COWI Consult AS, 2006) 39

Head-on and overtaking col. Speed Breadth Number of ships Leg length Speed Breadth Number of ships Head-on and overtaking collision In the figure to the left we have a shipping lane with ships to the right sailing north east and ships to the left sailing south eastward. Using AIS-data we can calculate the number of ships located at different distances from the centre of the lane. This produces two histograms, green and blue in the figure. The histograms show that most of the ships sail some distance from the centre of the lane. However a few ships sail very close to the centre line. The histograms can be fitted to a statistical distribution, for example a normal distribution. It is then possible to calculate the probability that a ship will be at a certain distance from the centre line. Using both distributions we can calculate the number of ships that are on a collision course. This value, called the geometrical number of collisions, is then multiplied by a human factor value in the order of 0.0001. Instead of head-on collision ships can also collide when overtaking each other. This is modelled the same way as head-on collision. N col = N geometric x P causation 40

Lateral Distribution of Vessels 28/08/2016 41

Lateral Distribution of Vessels 42

43

44

Basic Methodology X Gnd = N Gnd P C N Gnd = Number of Grounding Candidates P c = Causation Probability 45

Elements of Causation Probability Factors Human Factors 46

Elements of Causation Probability Factors Organisational/Structural 47

IWRAP Default Causation - Probabilities Fujii, Fujii et Mizuki, Matsui, Mac Duff, Cowi Consult, Karlson et al., Pedersen et al., etc. 48

The IALA Risk Management Tools Running IWRAP Mk2 49

50

First step is AIS data import Data can be imported as raw NMEA sentences or as decoded comma separated files DateTime mmsi lon lat cog heading sog imo typeofshipandcargo sizea sizeb sizec sized draught 30-09-2012 02:28:07 331394000-51.7236 64.17075 338 176 0.1 9606065 70 198 62 9 23 4 30-09-2012 02:32:30 331394000-51.7236 64.17078 351 176 0 9606065 70 198 62 9 23 4 30-09-2012 02:36:21 331394000-51.7236 64.17074 351 175 0 9606065 70 198 62 9 23 4 Static data can be imported seperatly If you have AIS data in several formats they can be imported one after the other. 51

Second step is usually a Density plot 52

Adding legs Decide what AIS data belongs to each leg -Width of box -Angle to leg 53

IWRAP extracts traffic volumes and lateral distributions 54

Ship types and ship lengths Each leg has traffic in two directions If a detailed static ship table does not exist IWRAP categorises: All tankers as Oil products tankers Container ships, Bulk carriers, Ro-Ro cargo ships as General cargo ships The ship types are not that important as IWRAP does not estimate consequences 55

Cape Town, 29 August 2016 Risk Management Tools - JM 28/08/2016 56

IWRAP results 57

58

IWRAP Mk2 Past/present traffic distribution and waterway geometry Historical Casualty data Running IWRAP Mk2 Results: Collision/ Grounding frequencies Verification Time 59

IWRAP Mk2 The programme is available free of charge for IALA Members A commercial version can be purchased with a one year license (GateHouse) 60

SQUART Simple Qualitative Assessment of Risk (project) 61

Risk An Existing Hazards The Control SQUART Principles should be assessed on the worst possible scenario in a defined zone (region), port or waterway on any one day analysis of each Zone is conducted by the Competent Authority in consultation with available stakeholders AtoN; hydrographic and meteorological data; traffic route, density and mix statistics and other factors are obtained from all available sources are identified and prioritised frequency (probability) and impact of each risk is agreed options are proposed for each risk 62

IMPACT Level of Risk Matrix PROBABILITY LOW (1) MEDIUM (2) HIGH (3) SEVERE (3) 3 6 9 MODERATE (2) 2 4 6 MINOR (1) 1 2 3 Risk = Probability * impact or consequence 1; 2 = acceptable: 3; 4 = caution: 6; 9 = unacceptable Aim to reduce risks to As Low As is Reasonably Practicable (ALARP) 63

The next IALA WWA training seminar on the use of the IALA Risk Management Tools will take place in Panama, 14 18 November 2016 Thank you. Chief Engineer (er) Jacques Manchard IALA Senior Adviser, IALA World-Wide Academy 64