REASSESSMENT MARKET UPDATE IMPACT

Similar documents
Report to: General Committee Date: February 5, Reassessment Market Update (Year 2 of 4) & Relative Property Tax Impact Report

To establish a policy that guides City assessment review activities to help ensure stability and accuracy of the assessment base.

2017 PROPERTY TAX RATIO POLICY

Corporate Report. Recommendation That Council approve the property tax rates as detailed in Appendix 1; and

SCHEDULE 20: Taxation Information

Council Report #

Region of Durham. Finance Department Presentation to Township of Scugog, February 21, 2018

Report to: General Committee Report Date: May 22, Tax Write-offs in Accordance with Section 354 of the Municipal Act, 2001

2018 Property Tax Rates and Related Matters

Year-End Tax File. Product/Service

Region of Peel Property Tax Policy Handbook

Report to: General Committee Meeting Date: February 21 st, Shane Manson, Senior Manager, Revenue & Property Tax Ext. 7514

Administration. October 2, 2015 CL , October 1, 2015 CSC , September 23, 2015 Report CSD

2007 Property Assessment and Tax Analysis of 2006 Data. Prepared for Real Property Association of Canada. November 23, 2007

Municipality of Chatham-Kent. Finance, Budget and Information Technology Services. Financial Services

How Economic Development and Assessment Work Together

Swampscott Board of Selectman

2006 Property Assessment and Tax Analysis of 2005 Data. Prepared for Real Property Association of Canada. December 14, 2006

2018 Budget Public Budget Consultation Meeting November 16 th, 2017

2013 Mill Rates and Property Taxes

Tax Supported Preliminary Operating Budget. Book 1. Budget Summary Report FCS17001

INFORMATION REPORT. Update Respecting Multi Residential Taxation (FCS18002) (City Wide) (Outstanding Business List Item)

GENERAL COMMITTEE AGENDA BUDGET MEETING #5 Tuesday, January 21, :30-8:30 p.m. Council Chambers

The 2011 Budget was constructed assuming a status

Pre-Amalgamated Tecumseh Area

TheCounty PRINCE EDWARD COUNTY * ONTARIO

Service Level Agreement between MPAC and Ontario Municipalities

By-law Whereas the total taxable assessment within the City of Markham is $69,456,056,905;

BY-LAW BE IT THEREFORE ENACTED BY THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF MARKHAM THE FOLLOWING:

Planning and Growth Management Committee Item PG17.5, as adopted by City of Toronto Council on October 2, 3 and 4, 2012 CITY OF TORONTO

THE CITY OF VAUGHAN BY-LAW BY-LAW NUMBER

Councillor Pam McConnell Budget Overview. February 24, 2010

The Corporation of the Town of Essex. By-Law Number additional charges for Municipal, County. and Education purposes for the year 2017

The City of Sarnia TRANSIT SERVICE & PROPERTY TAXATION. People Serving People

THE CITY OF EDMONTON BYLAW PROPERTY TAX AND SUPPLEMENTARY PROPERTY TAX BYLAW

Determining Reasons for Change Part 1 Generating a Zero Phase-in List

Agreement with the University of Toronto for Voluntary Payments Relating to its Revenue-Producing Properties

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF BONFIELD BY-LAW NO

PROPERTY TAX AND WATER BILLING

Municipality of Bluewater Draft Budget

Ministry of Finance Update

2018 Operating Budget Process

February 11, 2015 Revenue Overview

MITIGATING ASSESSMENT LOSSES. Grace Marsh, Town of Newmarket Casey Brendon, City of Toronto James Krauter, City of Guelph

2018 PRELIMINARY BUDGET April 16, 2018 Public Budget Review

GENERAL ISSUES COMMITTEE MINUTES :30 a.m. May 3, 2017 Council Chambers Hamilton City Hall 71 Main Street West

LONG-TERM FINANCIAL MASTER PLAN. City of Brampton. HEMSON C o n s u l t i n g L t d.

Infrastructure, Development and Enterprise Services Development Priorities Plan Summary

Strategies for the Future

The City of Hamilton Reviewing Vacant Unit Tax Rebate Program and Discounts for Excess/Vacant Land

Town of Nipawin 2018 Municipal Property Tax Policy

HOW THE BUDGET AFFECTS THE AVERAGE HOMEOWNER'S TAX BILL

COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL SARNIA, ONTARIO

EX30.5 REPORT FOR ACTION. Tax Policy Tools to Support Businesses SUMMARY

Tax Guide. for the Acquisition, Lease, and Sale. of Real Estate in Japan. by Non-Resident Individuals

Nith Peninsula, Brant County Fiscal Impact Study

Monthly Indicators. Monthly Snapshot. July % % + 6.6%

Operating and Capital Budgets

Presented by: Brian T. Ford, CPCU, MBA of Insurance Resources and Ashley Tharp of Wright Flood

A By-law of The Corporation of the City of Barrie to levy and collect taxes for municipal purposes of the City of Barrie for the year 2018.

Status of Outstanding Payment in Lieu of Tax Amounts for Federal, Provincial and Municipal Properties

THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BOOKE-ALVINSTON BY-LAW NUMBER 29 of 2017

CITY OF KAMLOOPS Council Budget Meeting Agenda March 14, 2017, at 9:00 am in Council Chambers at 7 Victoria Street West, Kamloops, BC, V2C 1A2

THE CITY OF VAUGHAN BY-LAW BY-LAW NUMBER

CHAIR AND MEMBERS CORPORATE SERVICES COMMITTEE MEETING ON APRIL 3, 2018

Operating and Capital Budgets

Tax Letter THE FIRST-TIME HOME BUYER S CREDIT CAPITAL GAIN OR INCOME? Since capital gains are only half taxed, the distinction

Calgary Young Practitioners Group

Restoring Multi-Dwelling and Large Losses Improving Knowledge and Efficiency

BY-LAW PASSED: May 7,2013

City of Kingston Report to Council Report Number

Ministry of Finance August 18, 2015

B Y-LAW NO Being a by-law to establish municipal and education tax rates for the year 2015.

SUBMITTED BY: Ryan Hagey, Director of Financial Planning, x 7353

A G E N D A BUDGET COMMITTEE November 21, :30 p.m. Council Chamber MEETING NO. 8


CITY OF BRAMPTON Budget Highlights. As Approved by City Council on February 23, 2011

Revenues. Property Tax. Property Tax Revenue vs. Assessed Valuations

By-Law Number A By-Law to Levy Taxes for Year 2018

The Residential Assessment Rate and the Gallagher Amendment

Municipal Capital Facilities Exemption of City Properties from Realty Taxes

Resolution # City of Fernley BUSINESS LICENSE FEE SCHEDULE Exhibit A Effective May 4, 2017

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF MIDLAND BY-LAW

DECLARATION OF THE MUNICIPAL TREASURER

INVESTOR PRESENTATION. November 2018

SCHEDULE A 2017 COUNTY-WIDE PROPERTY TAX POLICIES

Monthly Indicators. June Monthly Snapshot - 3.6% % + 4.1%

Innovative Approaches to Automating Mobility Administration

CITY OF DALLAS MASTER LEASE PROGRAM. BUDGET, FINANCE & AUDIT COMMITTEE February 3, 2014

Committee of Council Budget December 6, 9 and 10, 2013

Staff Reports, By-laws and Motions:

SCHEDULE 72: Continuity of Taxes Receivable

The University of Central Florida

Andrew Nazareth General Manager, Finance & Corporate Services Robert Gonzalez, P.Eng. General Manager, Engineering & Public Works

Southern California Edison Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No.

Update. Tax UK-REITS. January 2006

Glossary of Property Tax Terms

Schedule 27 OUTDOOR LIGHTING SERVICE HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM VAPOR

Executive Summary. Preliminary Financial Forecast

Proof of Asset Value Maximum value $200, subject to Housing Services Act Regulation 367 / 11 Section 35

Transcription:

REASSESSMENT MARKET UPDATE IMPACT 2017 Tax Year Year 1 of 4 of the Assessment Phase-in & Relative Tax Impact General Committee, February 6, 2017

2 AGENDA 1. REASSESSMENT FOUR YEAR MARKET UPDATE (2017 2020) 2. 2017 MARKET UPDATE CITY IMPACT SUMMARY 3. PROPERTY TAX IMPACTS 4. SUMMARY

3 1. REASSESSMENT FOUR YEAR MARKET UPDATE (2017 2020) MPAC is responsible for assigning a current value assessment (CVA) for all properties The CVA of a property is based on a valuation date of January 1 st, 2016, which was updated from January 1 st, 2012. Properties that have increased in value will have the CVA increase phased-in by 25% in each of the four years of the current reassessment phase-in cycle (2017 2020) Properties that experience a decrease in CVA will realize the change immediately in the first year of the reassessment cycle (2017) 2017 tax year marks the first year in the current phase-in cycle (2017-2020) Combination of the reassessment and the annual updates completed by MPAC equate to the results in the market update

4 1. REASSESSMENT FOUR YEAR MARKET UPDATE (2017 2020) In 2016, every property owner in the City of Markham received an updated property assessment notice from MPAC, which provided the reassessment values for their property over the four-year taxation period (2017 2020) In Year 1 of the reassessment cycle there are three types of properties: 1. Properties with an assessment increase; 2. Status quo properties (no change in assessment); and 3. Properties with an assessment decrease

5 1. REASSESSMENT FOUR YEAR MARKET UPDATE (2017 2020) Example of the four-year assessment phase-in program Property Type 2016 Full Assessment 2017 Full Assessment Market Increase 2017 Phased-In Assessment (Tax Year) 2018 2019 2020 Increasing Property 500,000 600,000 100,000 525,000 550,000 575,000 600,000 Decreasing Property 500,000 400,000 0 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 Properties that increase will have the assessment value phased-in by 25% in each of the four years of the cycle. Properties that experience a decrease in assessment value will realize the reassessment change immediately in the first year of the cycle. It is important to note that the City average assessment increase of 9.79%, is weighted by both increasing and decreasing assessments

6 2. 2017 MARKET UPDATE- CITY WIDE IMPACT SUMMARY 2017 City average assessment change Property Class Overall Reassessment Impact (2017 2020) 2017 Impact (Year 1 of 4) Residential 44.00% 11.07% Commercial 17.57% 4.01% Industrial 12.93% 2.35% Multi-Residential 25.34% 5.99% Farm 22.81% 5.56% Managed Forest (3.49)% (4.02)% Pipeline 9.66% 2.42% Total Taxable 39.62% 9.79% 1. Properties that have increased more than the City average will experience a tax increase 2. Properties that have increased at the City average will experience no change 3. Properties that have increased less than the City average will experience a tax decrease

2. 2017 MARKET UPDATE- CITY WIDE IMPACT SUMMARY Average CVA change for residential homes in Markham Property Type Property Count # 2016 Average CVA 2017 Average CVA Average Change in Phased CVA (2016-2017) % Single Detached 52,412 722,844 809,471 86,626 11.98% Link Home 13,068 485,803 543,988 58,185 11.98% Freehold Townhouse 8,340 458,869 509,627 50,758 11.06% Semi-Detached 6,164 467,601 519,856 52,255 11.18% Residential Condominium 18,611 347,824 364,454 16,630 4.78% Residential Homes 98,595 582,350 646,811 64,461 11.07% Below or Above City Average (9.79%) 1. 4 out of the 5 residential homes types will experience a property tax increase as they are above the City average of 9.79% 2. Average residential condominiums will experience a tax decrease as they are below the City average 3. Average residential homes in Markham will experience property tax increase as they are above the City average 7

8 2. 2017 MARKET UPDATE- CITY WIDE IMPACT SUMMARY Average CVA change for residential homes by ward Ward 2016 Average CVA 2017 Average CVA Year-Over-Year Change % 1 624,976 688,893 63,917 10.23% 2 719,422 805,851 86,428 12.01% 3 607,456 676,324 68,867 11.34% 4 545,350 605,924 60,574 11.11% 5 512,921 564,849 51,928 10.12% 6 627,908 702,329 74,421 11.85% 7 558,119 621,690 63,571 11.39% 8 474,684 523,986 49,302 10.39% Average Residential Home 582,350 646,811 Below or Above City Average (9.79%) Based on the City average of 9.79%, average homes in all wards will experience a tax increase due to the market update

9 3. PROPERTY TAX IMPACTS Tax Impact Example Due to Market Value Update Tax Year CVA Tax Rate % 2016 589,135 0.197612% 1,164 2017 646,811 0.180242% 1,164 Change % 9.79% -8.91% 0.00% Tax Tax Change 0 The 2017 market update in phased CVA for this example has been increased by the City average of 9.79% The 2017 tax rate is decreased to ensure the City collects the same amount of property tax as it did before the reassessment Tax impacts as a result of the market update are independent of the annual budget process

3. PROPERTY TAX IMPACTS Illustration of Tax Impact due to Market Value Update 2016 Phased CVA Value 2017 Phased CVA Value Change in Phased CVA % (Average City of Markham 9.79%) Property Tax Impact - As a result of the Change in Phased CVA (2016 vs. 2017 Phased CVA) Impact on City share of Tax Only (2016 to 2017) 589,135 659,831 12.00% 12% is greater than the 9.79% City-wide average; therefore this property experienced an increase in property tax due to reassessment. (12.00% - 9.79% = 2.21%) +23 589,135 646,811 9.79% 9.79% is the same as the 9.79% City-wide average; therefore this property will not experience a change in property tax due to reassessment. (9.79% - 9.79% = 0.00%) 0 589,135 618,592 5.00% 5% is lower than the 9.79% City-wide average increase; therefore this property experienced a decrease in property tax due to reassessment. (5.00% - 9.79% = (4.79%)) -51 10

11 4. SUMMARY The 2017 tax year marks the first year of the current phase-in cycle The City-wide average increase between the 2016 and 2017 tax years is 9.79% The average residential home in Markham will experience an increase in property tax due to the market update, as they are above the City-wide average increase of 9.79% The average residential condominium will experience a tax decrease as they are below the City-wide average increase of 9.79% The commercial class increased by 4.01% and the industrial class increased by 2.35% between 2016 and 2017. The average commercial and industrial property in all wards will experience a tax decrease as they are both below the City-wide average of 9.79% Tax impacts due to reassessment and the phasing in of assessment are independent of the City s annual budget process

QUESTIONS 12