Advanced Microeconomics

Similar documents
6.254 : Game Theory with Engineering Applications Lecture 3: Strategic Form Games - Solution Concepts

6.207/14.15: Networks Lecture 10: Introduction to Game Theory 2

Basic Game-Theoretic Concepts. Game in strategic form has following elements. Player set N. (Pure) strategy set for player i, S i.

Economics 171: Final Exam

An introduction on game theory for wireless networking [1]

Strategies and Nash Equilibrium. A Whirlwind Tour of Game Theory

Microeconomics II. CIDE, MsC Economics. List of Problems

10.1 Elimination of strictly dominated strategies

Rationalizable Strategies

Game Theory: Normal Form Games

Preliminary Notions in Game Theory

GAME THEORY. Department of Economics, MIT, Follow Muhamet s slides. We need the following result for future reference.

FDPE Microeconomics 3 Spring 2017 Pauli Murto TA: Tsz-Ning Wong (These solution hints are based on Julia Salmi s solution hints for Spring 2015.

Answers to Problem Set 4

Microeconomics Comprehensive Exam

Stochastic Games and Bayesian Games

Game Theory Fall 2003

Game theory and applications: Lecture 1

Games of Incomplete Information ( 資訊不全賽局 ) Games of Incomplete Information

ECONS 424 STRATEGY AND GAME THEORY HANDOUT ON PERFECT BAYESIAN EQUILIBRIUM- III Semi-Separating equilibrium

Game Theory: Additional Exercises

SI 563 Homework 3 Oct 5, Determine the set of rationalizable strategies for each of the following games. a) X Y X Y Z

On Existence of Equilibria. Bayesian Allocation-Mechanisms

Sequential Rationality and Weak Perfect Bayesian Equilibrium

G5212: Game Theory. Mark Dean. Spring 2017

Notes on Game Theory Debasis Mishra October 29, 2018

HW Consider the following game:

CS711: Introduction to Game Theory and Mechanism Design

Introduction to game theory LECTURE 2

Stochastic Games and Bayesian Games

G5212: Game Theory. Mark Dean. Spring 2017

Introduction to Industrial Organization Professor: Caixia Shen Fall 2014 Lecture Note 5 Games and Strategy (Ch. 4)

Strategy -1- Strategy

Problem 3 Solutions. l 3 r, 1

Sequential-move games with Nature s moves.

1 R. 2 l r 1 1 l2 r 2

University of Hong Kong

In the Name of God. Sharif University of Technology. Microeconomics 2. Graduate School of Management and Economics. Dr. S.

CMSC 474, Introduction to Game Theory 16. Behavioral vs. Mixed Strategies

PAULI MURTO, ANDREY ZHUKOV

Lecture 3 Representation of Games

Mixed Strategies. In the previous chapters we restricted players to using pure strategies and we

Not 0,4 2,1. i. Show there is a perfect Bayesian equilibrium where player A chooses to play, player A chooses L, and player B chooses L.

Extensive-Form Games with Imperfect Information

Repeated Games. September 3, Definitions: Discounting, Individual Rationality. Finitely Repeated Games. Infinitely Repeated Games

General Examination in Microeconomic Theory SPRING 2014

SF2972 GAME THEORY Infinite games

Noncooperative Market Games in Normal Form

Game Theory for Wireless Engineers Chapter 3, 4

d. Find a competitive equilibrium for this economy. Is the allocation Pareto efficient? Are there any other competitive equilibrium allocations?

6.207/14.15: Networks Lecture 9: Introduction to Game Theory 1

Game Theory Fall 2006

CS711 Game Theory and Mechanism Design

Introduction. Microeconomics II. Dominant Strategies. Definition (Dominant Strategies)

Microeconomic Theory III Final Exam March 18, 2010 (80 Minutes)

Advanced Micro 1 Lecture 14: Dynamic Games Equilibrium Concepts

Lecture 1: Normal Form Games: Refinements and Correlated Equilibrium

Introduction to Game Theory

MS&E 246: Lecture 2 The basics. Ramesh Johari January 16, 2007

Game theory for. Leonardo Badia.

INTERIM CORRELATED RATIONALIZABILITY IN INFINITE GAMES

Regret Minimization and Security Strategies

Duopoly models Multistage games with observed actions Subgame perfect equilibrium Extensive form of a game Two-stage prisoner s dilemma

Beliefs and Sequential Rationality

Economics 109 Practice Problems 1, Vincent Crawford, Spring 2002

The Ohio State University Department of Economics Econ 601 Prof. James Peck Extra Practice Problems Answers (for final)

Game Theory. VK Room: M1.30 Last updated: October 22, 2012.

Epistemic Game Theory

CUR 412: Game Theory and its Applications Final Exam Ronaldo Carpio Jan. 13, 2015

1 Games in Strategic Form

Outline Introduction Game Representations Reductions Solution Concepts. Game Theory. Enrico Franchi. May 19, 2010

Prisoner s Dilemma. CS 331: Artificial Intelligence Game Theory I. Prisoner s Dilemma. Prisoner s Dilemma. Prisoner s Dilemma.

S 2,2-1, x c C x r, 1 0,0

In the Name of God. Sharif University of Technology. Graduate School of Management and Economics

January 26,

MKTG 555: Marketing Models

In Class Exercises. Problem 1

ECON 459 Game Theory. Lecture Notes Auctions. Luca Anderlini Spring 2017

ECE 586GT: Problem Set 1: Problems and Solutions Analysis of static games

Chapter 11: Dynamic Games and First and Second Movers

CS 331: Artificial Intelligence Game Theory I. Prisoner s Dilemma

Optimal Auctions. Game Theory Course: Jackson, Leyton-Brown & Shoham

arxiv: v1 [cs.gt] 12 Jul 2007

Econ 711 Homework 1 Solutions

So we turn now to many-to-one matching with money, which is generally seen as a model of firms hiring workers

Simon Fraser University Spring 2014

Microeconomic Theory May 2013 Applied Economics. Ph.D. PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION MICROECONOMIC THEORY. Applied Economics Graduate Program.

MA300.2 Game Theory 2005, LSE

Best-Reply Sets. Jonathan Weinstein Washington University in St. Louis. This version: May 2015

B w x y z a 4,4 3,3 5,1 2,2 b 3,6 2,5 6,-3 1,4 A c -2,0 2,-1 0,0 2,1 d 1,4 1,2 1,1 3,5

Game Theory. Analyzing Games: From Optimality to Equilibrium. Manar Mohaisen Department of EEC Engineering

MA200.2 Game Theory II, LSE

Exercises Solutions: Game Theory

Extensive Form Games II

PAULI MURTO, ANDREY ZHUKOV. If any mistakes or typos are spotted, kindly communicate them to

Introduction to Game Theory

Microeconomic Theory II Preliminary Examination Solutions Exam date: August 7, 2017

Game Theory. Lecture Notes By Y. Narahari. Department of Computer Science and Automation Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, India October 2012

Microeconomics III Final Exam SOLUTIONS 3/17/11. Muhamet Yildiz

(a) (5 points) Suppose p = 1. Calculate all the Nash Equilibria of the game. Do/es the equilibrium/a that you have found maximize social utility?

Transcription:

Advanced Microeconomics ECON5200 - Fall 2014

Introduction What you have done: - consumers maximize their utility subject to budget constraints and firms maximize their profits given technology and market prices; - no strategic behavior. What we will do: - in many interesting situations, agents optimal behavior depends on the other agents behavior; - strategic behavior. Game theory provides a language to analyze such strategic situations; Countless number of examples! Auctions, Bargaining, Price competition, Civil Conflicts...

Introduction Road map Static Game: 1. With Complete Information (I); 2. With Incomplete Information (II). Dynamic Game: 1. With Complete Information (II-III); 2. With Incomplete Information (III).

Strategic Game with Pure Strategies N players with i I ; s S u i (s) payoff; S i pure strategy profile, s i S i ; i=1,..,n G I, {S i } i, {u i (s)} i strategic formof finite game with pure strategy.

Strategic Game with Mixed Strategies σ (S) (S i ) mixed strategyprofile, σ i (S i ); i=1,..,n u i (σ) = σ j (s j ) u i (s j ) expected utility; s S j=1,..,n G I, { (S i )} i, {u i (σ)} i strategic form of finite game with mixed strategy; Interpreting mixed strategies: - as object of choice; - as pure strategies of a perturbed game (see later in Bayesian Games); - as beliefs.

Equilibrium Concepts Nash Equilibrium it is assumed that each player holds the correct expectation about the other players behavior and act rationally (steady state equilibrium notion); Rationalizability players beliefs about each other s actions are not assumed to be correct, but are constrained by consideration of rationality; Every Nash equilibrium is rationalizable.

Rationalizability Definition In G, s i is rationalizableif there exists Z j S j for each j I such that: 1. s i Z i ; 2. every s j Z j is a best response to some belief µ j (Z j ). Common knowledge of rationality; An action is rationalizable if and only if it can be rationalized by an infinite sequence of actions and beliefs.

Example (1 - Rationalizability - See notes!)...

Strictly Dominance Definition s i is not strictly dominatedif it does not exist a strategy σ i : u i (σ i, s i ) > u i (s i, s i ), s i S i

Strictly Dominance A unique strictly dominant strategy equilibrium (D, D): It is Pareto dominated by (C, C ). Does it really occur??

Iterative Elimination of Strictly Dominated Strategies Definition Set S 0 = S, then for any m > 0 s i Si m any σ i such that: iff there does not exist u i (σ i, s i ) > u i (s i, s i ), s i S m 1 i Definition For any player i, a strategy is said to be rationalizable if and only if s i Si Si m. m 0

Example (2 - Beauty Contest - See notes!)...

Iterated Weak Dominance There can be more that one answer for iterated weak dominance; Not for iterated strong dominance.

Example (3 - Cournot vs Bertrand Competition - Proposed as exercise) Example n profit-maximizer-firms produce q i quantity of consumption good at a marginal cost equal to c > 0; demand function is P = max {1 Q, 0} with Q Find: 1. The rationalizable equilibria when n = 2; 2. The rationalizable equilibria when n > 2; q i ; i=1...n 3. Compare your results with the Bertrand competition outcome.

Nash Equilibrium Definition σ i (S i ) is a best responseto σ i (S i ) if: u i (σ i, σ i ) u i (s i, σ i ) for all s i S i Let B i (σ i ) (S i ) be the set of player i best response. Definition σ is a Nash equilibriumprofile if for each i I. σ i B i (σ i )

Nash Theorem Theorem (Nash (1950)) A Nash equilibrium exists in a finite game. Theorem (Kakutani Fixed Point Theorem) Let X be a compact, convex and non-empty subset of R n, a correspondence f : X X has a fixed point if: 1. f is non-empty for all x X ; 2. f is convex for all x X ; 3. f is upper hemi-continuous (closed graph).

Best Response Correspondence Example

The Kitty Genovese Problem/Bystander Effect n identical people; x > 1 benefits if someone calls the police; 1 cost of calling the police; What is the symmetric mixed strategy equilibriumwith p equal to the probability of calling the policy? In equilibrium each player must be indifferent between calling or not the police; If i calls the police, gets x 1 for sure; If i doesn t, gets: 0 with Pr (1 p) n 1 x with Pr 1 (1 p) n 1

The Kitty Genovese Problem/Bystander Effect Indifference when: x 1 = x (1 (1 p) n 1) Equilibrium symmetric mixed strategy is p = 1 (1/x) 1/(n 1) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/murder_of_kitty_genovese

Zero-Sum Game Definition A N-player game G is a zero-sum game(a strictly competitive game) if u i (s) = K for every s S. i=1,..,n

Zero-Sum Game Definition σ i (S i ) is maxminimizerfor player i if: min u i (σ i, σ i ) min u ( ) i σ i, σ i for each σi (S i ) σ i (S i ) σ i (S i ) A maxminimizer maximizes the payoff in the worst case scenario Theorem Let G be a zero-sum game. Then σ (S) is a Nash Equilibrium iff, for each i, σ is a maxminimizer.

Example (4 - All-Pay Auction - Proposed as exercise) Two players submit a bid for an object of worth k; b i [0, k] individual strategy space where b i is the bid; The winner is the player with the highest bid; If tie each player gets half the object, k/2; Each player pays her bid regardless of whether she wins; Find that: 1. No pure Nash equilibria exist; 2. The mixed strategy equilibrium is equal to the one represented here below.

Example (4 - All-Pay Auction - Proposed as exercise)

Extensive Form Games Representation of a Game Normal or strategic form; Extensive form. The Extensive form contains all the information about a game: who moves when; what each player knows when he moves; what moves are available to him; where each move leads. whereas a normal form is a summary representation.

Extensive Form Games Extensive Form Definition A treeis a set of nodes and directed edges connecting these nodes such that: 1. for each node, there is at most one incoming edge; 2. for any two nodes, there is a unique path that connect these two nodes. Definition An extensive form game consists of i) a set of players (including possibly Nature), ii) a tree, iii) an information set for each player, iv) an informational partition, and v) payoffs for each player at each end node (except Nature).

Extensive Form Games Extensive Form Definition An information setis a collection of points (nodes) such that: 1. the same player i is to move at each of these nodes; 2. the same moves are available at each of these nodes. Definition An information partitionis an allocation of each node of the tree (except the starting and end-nodes) to an information set. Definition A (behavioral) strategyof a player is a complete contingent-plan determining which action he will take at each information set he is to move.

Extensive Form Games Extensive Form vs Normal Form