BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER. Exhibit 1 Utah STEP Pilot Program Instructions

Similar documents
Energy Transition Long-Short Strategy

Rocky Mountain Power Exhibit RMP (JKL-5) Docket No Witness: Jeffrey K. Larsen BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH

BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER. Direct Testimony of Michael G. Wilding

Deutsche Bank Clean Tech, Utilities & Power Conference. May 14, 2012

Depreciable assets 361 Structures. Easements. Depreciable assets 366 Structures. and easements. Mains and TBS. includes services.

2019 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) Public Input Meeting January 24, 2019

Utility Asset Securitization: Helping Consumers, Utilities and Affected Energy Communities

Rocky Mountain Power Exhibit RMP (SRM-1R) Docket No ER-15 Witness: Steven R. McDougal BEFORE THE WYOMING PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

/s/ John L. Carley Assistant General Counsel

Evercore ISI Utility CEO Retreat

SECOND QUARTER 2017 RESULTS. August 3, 2017

Q. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND BUSINESS ADDRESS. A. My name is Suzanne E. Sieferman, and my business address is 1000 East Main

FOURTH QUARTER AND FULL-YEAR 2017 RESULTS. February 23, 2018

Washington Gas Light Company Utility Rate Requests District of Columbia Formal Case No Decision May 15, 2013

Public Service Company of Colorado. Proceeding No. 14AL-0660E

2017 Integrated Resource Plan. Portfolio Development Detail September 8, 2016

Portland General Electric Reports 2017 Financial Results and Initiates 2018 Earnings Guidance

Electric Price Outlook for Indiana Low Load Factor (LLF) customers December 2016

Rocky Mountain Power Exhibit RMP (GND-5) Docket No ER-15 Witness: Gregory N. Duvall BEFORE THE WYOMING PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

Electric Price Outlook for Indiana High Load Factor (HLF) customers December 2016

DEUTSCHE 2017 CLEAN TECH, UTILITIES & POWER CONFERENCE

BC HYDRO S APPLICATION FOR 2004/05 AND 2005/06 REVENUE REQUIREMENTS BCOAPO et al. INFORMATION REQUESTS

) ) ) ) ) SHORT TITLE

BEFORE THE WYOMING PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER. Direct Testimony of Cindy A. Crane

Pacific Power & Light Company Revised Cal.P.U.C.Sheet No E Portland, Oregon Canceling Revised Cal.P.U.C.Sheet No E

GUIDELINES FOR ACCOUNTING RELATED TO COSTS OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT

FOURTH QUARTER AND FULL-YEAR 2016 RESULTS. February 24, 2017

FERC Accounting and Reporting Issues

FortisBC Inc. Annual Review of 2018 Rates Project No British Columbia Utilities Commission Information Request No. 1

Portland General Electric

BEFORE THE WYOMING PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER. Rebuttal Testimony of Bruce N. Williams

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C FORM 10-Q

2015 General Rate Case

PacifiCorp Utah All Source Request for Proposal 2016 Resource. Issued January 6, 2012 Responses May 9, 2012

North Carolina Eastern Municipal Power Agency 2013 Financial Report

FOURTH QUARTER AND FULL-YEAR 2018 RESULTS. February 22, 2019

PINNACLE WEST CAPITAL CORP

2015 Connecticut Legislative Session and June Special Session NICHOLAS CICALE LEGISLATIVE COMMISSIONERS OFFICE

Colorado PUC E-Filings System

REVIEWING THE SUSTAINABLE FINANCE LANDSCAPE INSIGHT BRIEF October 2015

BUSINESS INCOME TAX MEASURES

FIRST QUARTER 2014 RESULTS. May 2, 2014

Xcel Energy Fixed Income Meetings

January 3, Ms. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C.

Approval of the Annual Report to the Board on the Regionally Competitive Rates Policy

General Business and Investment Provisions

AN ACT. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Ohio:

H I G H L I G H T S. Financial Strength: Strong Asset Base Strong Capital Structure. High Credit Quality

Statement of Statutory Accounting Principles No. 89. Accounting for Pensions, A Replacement of SSAP No. 8

UTILITY ACCOUNTING 101

Fiscal Policy and Financial Support Schemes for Clean Energy Mini Grids (CEMG)

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * * * DIRECT TESTIMONY AND ATTACHMENTS OF LISA H.

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

BEFORE THE WYOMING PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER. Rebuttal Testimony of Dana M. Ralston

Emera Investor Day. Tampa, FL June 21, 2018

Q Earnings Review August 9, 2016

FortisBC Energy Inc. An indirect subsidiary of Fortis Inc. Consolidated Financial Statements For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012

Actual neighborhood of Sunrun customer homes

9M QUARTERLY STATEMENT Financial Year

Rocky Mountain Power Exhibit RMP (JRS-3SS) Docket No EA-17 Witness: Joelle R. Steward BEFORE THE WYOMING PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

EVERCORE ISI UTILITY CEO RETREAT. January 12 & 13, 2017

Management recommends the following enhancements to these modifications to the provisions for commitment costs:

9M QUARTERLY STATEMENT Financial Year

CASE 17-M-0178 Draft Discussion Document, November 2017 Session, Publicly Released November 15, 2017 STATE OF NEW YORK PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION

Resource Planning Update. May 12, 2016 Board Meeting Presentation

MICHIGAN CONSOLIDATED GAS COMPANY Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and for each of the three years in the period

FIRST QUARTER 2016 RESULTS. April 29, 2016

BUSINESS PLANNING ASSUMPTIONS

2017 Session (79th) A AB206 R Senate Amendment to Assembly Bill No. 206 Second Reprint (BDR )

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * * *

Powering Beyond. EEI Finance Conference November 11 13, 2018

Suite 314 P.O. Box 350 Trenton, NJ Suite 314 P.O. Box 350 Trenton, NJ

January 17, 2004 Revision 4

Public Service Enterprise Group

Vermont Department of Public Service Testimony of Commissioner June E. Tierney FY 2019 PSD Budget. February 2, 2018

Electric price outlook for Indiana Low Load Factor (LLF) customers February 2013

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION

Rocky Mountain Power Docket No Witness: Douglas K. Stuver BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER

Third Quarter 2017 Financial Results

Green Bond Guidelines for the Real Estate Sector

Half Year Results 6 Months Ended 30 June July 2018

Electric Price Outlook for Indiana High Load Factor (HLF) customers September 2015

Brooklyn Union Gas Company d/b/a National Grid NY Consolidated Financial Statements For the years ended March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2011

State Legislation and Regulations Supporting Nuclear Plant Construction

Exhibit 99.1 MICHIGAN CONSOLIDATED GAS COMPANY

EPA s Proposed Federal Plan and Model Trading Rules. Stakeholder Meeting Iowa DNR Air Quality Bureau November 16, 2015

Solar Gr G e r en n Bond n s s Webinar July 2016

2017 Earnings Webcast February 13, 2018

Attachment 3 - PECO Statement No. 2 Direct Testimony and Exhibits of Alan B. Cohn

Draft letter to Finance Minister regarding renewable energy and the EU Budget cc. Energy Minister

Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. A Division of MDU Resources Group, Inc. 400 N 4 th Street Bismarck, ND 58501

Portland General Electric Company Sheet No SCHEDULE 201 QUALIFYING FACILITY 10 MW or LESS AVOIDED COST POWER PURCHASE INFORMATION

ORCAS POWER AND LIGHT COOPERATIVE 2018 Q3 FINANCIALS Q3 Financial Report Page 1 of 20

UBS Natural Gas & Electric Utilities Conference March 2, 2016

Macquarie Capital (USA), Inc. Global Infrastructure Conference May 25-26, 2010

Updates & Milestones re: Peak Demand Reduction. EEAC Consultants (with PA contributions) (Revised, 3/13/17)

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * * *

04/16/2014- AMENDED AND REPORTED OUT TO THE FLOOR 04/04/14-AMENDED AND REPORTED OUT TO THE COMMITTEE ON RULES AND JUDICIARY 09/13/13-NO ACTION TAKEN

Rocky Mountain Power Docket No Witness: Bruce N. Williams BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER

Transcription:

Exhibit RMP (SRM-1) BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER Exhibit 1 Utah STEP Pilot Program Instructions October 2016

Exhibit RMP (SRM-1) Page 1 of 6 Utah STEP Pilot Program Instructions Table of Contents Purpose... 1 Fund Category... 1 Accounting Treatment... 2 Standard Program Expense... 2 Capital Projects... 2 Gadsby Curtailment... 2 Carrying Charges... 3 Charges Not Eligible for STEP Funding... 3 SAP WBS Structure... 3 STEP Project Checklist... 5 Purpose This document describes how costs will be tracked for the Utah STEP pilot ( STEP ) program. The instructions are intended to allow departments involved with STEP to follow their existing project management procedures to the extent possible, while still tracking costs to meet potential regulatory reporting requirements. Each department, depending on preferences or needs, may choose whether to use internal orders or Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) elements to process STEP expenditures. However, to properly account for and track STEP project costs it is important to ensure that all related SAP internal orders and WBS elements are set up properly and only authorized spend is charged to the projects. Fund Category STEP projects are assigned to a funding category in order to properly track the 10 million annual expenditures mandated by the STEP legislation. Funding is allocated in the following manner: 2 million annually for the electric vehicle incentive program 1 million annual average for clean coal technology research 3.4 million annual average for innovative utility programs such as economic development, solar generation, battery storage or other innovative grid projects, commercial line extensions, plant emissions curtailment, additional electric vehicle programs, additional clean coal programs, or any other technology program 2.6 million for unrecovered costs from the Utah Solar Incentive Program ( USIP ).

Exhibit RMP (SRM-1) Page 2 of 6 1.0 million for other conservation, efficiency, or new technology programs the commission determines are cost effective and in the public interest. Accounting Treatment Accounting treatment is determined by the nature of the costs. Based on currently planned programs costs fit into one of three categories: 1. Standard program expenses 2. Capital projects 3. Gadsby curtailment Standard Program Expense STEP project expenses result when PacifiCorp pays out funds without establishing a capitalizable asset, and if not related to Gadsby curtailment the costs are deemed standard program expenses. STEP project costs will be expensed as incurred in accordance with regulatory balance accounting. STEP project examples likely to be expensed as incurred include incentive payments towards customer owned electric vehicle charging stations, payment to R&D entities for research grants or services, Gadsby curtailment, and certain clean coal technology projects. Capital Projects STEP capital projects will be set up in SAP to initially settle to Construction Work In Progress (CWIP), similar to standard capital projects. A monthly accounting reconciliation will identify STEP capital projects that have incurred costs and journal entries will be prepared to charge the STEP balancing account (including the corresponding STEP WBS element) and reduce CWIP as Contributions In Aid of Construction (CIAC). Costs are considered capitalizable when the following criteria are met: 1. Asset must be used in the company s operations (otherwise classify as non utility property) or provide benefit to the company. 2. Asset must have an expected useful life of one year or greater. 3. Asset must be identifiable as a property retirement unit (PRU), as determined by asset accounting PRU catalogs. Examples of projects that may be considered capital include grid battery storage equipment, grid smart metering equipment, commercial line extensions, and certain clean coal technology projects. Gadsby Curtailment During periods the Utah Department of Air Quality has identified as non attainment events, RMP may elect to curtail the use of Gadsby units 1, 2, and 3. Units 4, 5, and 6 will not be part of the program due to reliability requirements, and units 1, 2, and 3 may not be curtailed in emergency situations. If a STEP Gadsby qualifying curtailment event occurs, the Energy Supply Management (ESM) team will identify the incremental increase to net power costs from the curtailment. Accounting will then charge this amount to the STEP balancing account (including the designated STEP WBS element) and reduce net power costs. 2

Exhibit RMP (SRM-1) Page 3 of 6 Carrying Charges The STEP legislation provides for carrying charges to be applied to 3 separate balances: Regulatory asset balancing account for unamortized Demand Side Management (DSM) expenditures Regulatory liability balancing account for accelerated thermal plant depreciation Regulatory balancing account for STEP program allocations, STEP program expenditures, and unrecovered USIP costs. The balancing accounts for DSM expenditures (regulatory asset) and accelerated plant depreciation (regulatory liability) will have carrying charges with a rate equal to the most recent commission approved pre tax weighted average cost of capital. Carrying charges for the regulatory asset and regulatory liability are netted against each other, and any remaining amount is applied to the regulatory account which carries the greater balance. This net application occurs for both the balance sheet and income statement accounts. The USIP/STEP pilot programs balancing account will have a separate carrying charge rate set by the commission. On a monthly basis the carrying charge is applied to the full beginning balance for the period and to half of the current month s collections and expenditures, or in other words, to the average of the current month s activity. Charges Not Eligible for STEP Funding Since STEP projects are funded through a surcharge tariff, the following costs should not be charged to STEP projects: 1. Internal labor 1 2. Capital Surcharges 3. Allowance for Funds Used During Construction (AFUDC) 2 4. Grant funds used in connection with STEP projects SAP WBS Structure STEP expenditures will use an SAP WBS structure to track projects. When processing costs for a STEP program, it is important to know the: 1. Nature of the expenditure (i.e. capital vs. expense; see Standard Program Expense and Capital sections above) 1 Incremental STEP program costs or employees who are either partially or fully not included in base rates (such as Customer Solutions employees) may be allowable STEP costs. This exception will be determined based on commission STEP program approvals. Please contact the applicable STEP project manager to determine if any internal labor may have been approved to be charged to STEP projects. 2 AFUDC is not applicable either because funds have already been received from customers, or if collections have not been received a regulatory asset earns a return through a carrying charge. 3

Exhibit RMP (SRM-1) Page 4 of 6 2. Program for the expenditure (i.e. line extension, EV charging infrastructure, grid battery, etc.) WBS elements will be created for each STEP program that has been approved by the commission. All WBS elements describe the program it is associated with, and whether the expenditures are capital or expense. If a STEP cost is capital, the internal order or WBS element used to process the cost should NOT settle to the STEP WBS structure. Instead, the settlement rules should be set up in the same manner as a standard capital project to settle to CWIP. The only difference in creating the capital project will involve the investment reason assignment: If the project is for a T&D project other than a commercial line extension, the Investment reason should be ST. If the project is a generation project, the investment reason should be SG. If the project is a commercial line extension, the investment reason should be selected using the standard line extension instructions. In cases when a program contains both capital and expense components, the capital setup instructions and expense setup instructions should be used by creating separate WBS elements/internal orders that settle to CWIP for capital and to the appropriate STEP WBS element for expense. 4

Exhibit RMP (SRM-1) Page 5 of 6 All expense STEP program costs should settle to the relevant WBS element listed in the following STEP project structure: 1 Electric Vehicle Programs 2 CREG/2017/D/STP/EVECI Expense Charging Infrastructure Incentives Capital expenditures use standard capital settlements and STEP investment reason 1 Clean Coal Technology 2 Expense NOx Control Technology 3 CREG/2017/D/STP/CCENO01 Expense NOx Neural Network 3 CREG/2017/D/STP/CCENO02 Expense NOx Alternative 2 Expense CO2 Reduction 3 CREG/2017/D/STP/CCECOR01 Expense Woody Waste Test Burn 3 CREG/2017/D/STP/CCECOR02 Expense Solar assisted Feedwater Heating 2 Expense CO2 Capture 3 CREG/2017/D/STP/CCECOC01 Expense CO2 Capture Cryogenic 2 Expense CO2 Sequestration 3 CREG/2017/D/STP/CCECOS01 Expense CO2 Coal Bed Methane 3 CREG/2017/D/STP/CCECOS02 Expense CO2 USTAR Sequestration Capital expenditures use standard capital settlements and STEP investment reason 1 Innovative Utility Programs 2 CREG/2017/D/STP/IUESI Expense Solar (Grid Performance) 2 CREG/2017/D/STP/IUEBS Expense Battery (Grid Performance) 2 CREG/2017/D/STP/IUECP Expense Circuit Performance Meters 2 CREG/2017/D/STP/IUECL Expense Commercial Line Extension 2 CREG/2017/D/STP/IUEGE Expense Gadsby Emissions Curtailment 2 CREG/2017/D/STP/IUEEV Expense Additional Electric Vehicle Programs 2 CREG/2017/D/STP/IUECC Expense Additional Clean Coal Technology Capital expenditures use standard capital settlements and STEP investment reason 1 Utah Solar Incentive Program 2 CREG/2017/D/STP/USECR Utah Solar Incentive Program Cost Recovery 1 Conservation, Efficiency and Other New Technology Programs 2 WBS elements to be determined A listing of all STEP program WBS elements will be periodically distributed by the STEP program manager as changes occur. STEP Project Checklist 2,600,000 Total 10,000,000 1. Confirm expenditure qualifies for STEP funding (i.e. is part of an approved STEP project, does not include internal labor, etc.). 2. When submitting an APR for a STEP capital project, include cost detail in the project that breaks out the amount of the project funded by STEP. 3. When creating STEP internal orders or WBS elements for costs to be treated as expense, confirm settlement WBS selected is for the correct STEP fund category, project, and expense designation. Capital STEP WBS elements created should settle to CWIP like a standard capital project and use appropriate investment reason (see below). 4. For all STEP capital projects the investment reason should be selected as follows: 2,000,000 1,000,000 3,400,000 1,000,000 5

Exhibit RMP (SRM-1) Page 6 of 6 SG for Generation projects ST for T&D projects other than commercial line extension projects Commercial line extension projects should have the investment reason selected using standard T&D project guidelines 5. If creating a STEP capital project, ensure separate WBS elements are created for expenditures funded by STEP vs expenditures funded by PacifiCorp. WBS elements funded by STEP should not accrue AFUDC or Capital surcharge, and PacifiCorp funded WBS elements will follow standard AFUDC/Capital surcharge instructions. 6