Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, California; Sales Tax

Similar documents
April 10,

Connecticut; Gas Tax

Summary: Windsor, Connecticut; General Obligation. Table Of Contents. Rationale Outlook Related Research. March 12,

28 ИЮНЯ 2012 Г. 1

Friendswood, Texas; General Obligation

Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District, Oregon; Miscellaneous Tax

Summary: San Benito, Texas; General Obligation

Apex Town, North Carolina; General Obligation

Gabriel Petek, CFA Managing Director U.S. Public Finance Copyright 2016 by S&P Global. All rights reserved.

Summary: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Hospital. Table Of Contents. Rationale Outlook Related Criteria And Research.

Southern California Metropolitan Water District; General Obligation; Water/Sewer

Summary: San Mateo County Community College District, California; Appropriations; General Obligation. Table Of Contents

Springfield, Michigan; General Obligation

Puerto Rico; General Obligation; General Obligation Equivalent Security

Montebello Public Financing Authority Montebello, California; Appropriations; General Obligation

Canton, Massachusetts; General Obligation; Note

Shenandoah, Texas; General Obligation

Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority, California; Ports/Port Authorities

National Public Finance Guarantee Corp., MBIA Inc. Ratings Raised On Reentry Into Financial Markets; Outlooks Are Stable

Jacksonville, Florida; General Obligation; Miscellaneous Tax

Connecticut; State Revolving Funds/Pools

Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago; General Obligation

S&P's Views Of GASB's Proposed Changes In Government Pension Accounting

Summary: Fresno, California; Appropriations; General Obligation. Table Of Contents. Rationale Outlook Related Criteria And Research.

PPPs, Contingent Liabilities And Sovereign s Credit Quality

Frederick City, Maryland; General Obligation

Prince William County, Virginia; Appropriations; General Obligation

Albany County Airport Authority, New York Albany International Airport; Airport

Monrovia, California; Appropriations; General Obligation

Sovereign Rating Trends In Central America

Summary: Orleans Parish Law Enforcement District, Louisiana; General Obligation. Table Of Contents. Rationale Outlook Related Research

Mound, MInnesota; General Obligation

Hartford County Metropolitan District, Connecticut; General Obligation

Wicomico County, Maryland; General Obligation

Brightwaters Village, New York; General Obligation

Linden-Kildare Consolidated Independent School District, Texas; General Obligation

Providence Water Supply Board, Rhode Island; Water/Sewer

Navigators International Insurance Co. Ltd. Assigned 'A' Ratings; Outlook Stable

Burlington, Massachusetts; General Obligation; Note

Build NYC Resource Corp. YMCA Of Greater New York; Non-Profit Organizations

RMBS ARREARS STATISTICS

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority, North Carolina; CP; Joint Criteria; System

Prince William County, Virginia; Appropriations; General Obligation

Cuyahoga County, Ohio; Sales Tax

Parker Water & Sanitation District, Colorado; General Obligation

Snohomish County Public Utility District No. 1, Washington; Retail Electric

St. Marys County, Maryland; General Obligation

Illinois Finance Authority UNO Charter School Network; Charter Schools

Standard & Poor s Presentation Virginia GFOA

Chicago Board of Education; General Obligation

Lubbock, Texas; Retail Electric

Interactive Brokers LLC

Lyndhurst Township, New Jersey; General Obligation

Research Update: Grupo de Inversiones Suramericana S.A. 'BBB-' Ratings Affirmed, Off CreditWatch On Successful Capitalization Plan.

Stonington, Connecticut; General Obligation; Note

Research Update: Kingdom of Belgium Outlook Revised To Negative On Political Deadlock; 'AA+/A-1+' Rating Affirmed.

Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority, California; Ports/Port Authorities

Santa Monica Public Financing Authority, California Santa Monica; Appropriations; General Obligation

Bristol, Connecticut; General Obligation; Note

Bay City, Michigan; General Obligation

Mont Blanc Capital Corp. (As Of June 2014)

ING Verzekeringen N.V.

Health Care Service Corp. d/b/a Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas and Montana Downgraded

Lancaster County Hospital Authority, Pennsylvania Masonic Villages of the Grand Lodge of Pennsylvania; Long Term Care

S&P Global Ratings: Natural Disasters Credit Update

Overview Rating Action Rationale Outlook Related Criteria And Research Ratings List Teleconference Information

White Plains Capital Company, LLC (As Of April 2014)

Swiss Financial Services Provider PostFinance AG Assigned 'AA+/A-1+' Ratings; Outlook Stable

Illinois Finance Authority Rush University Medical Center Obligated Group; Joint Criteria; System

Ratings On International Finance Corporation Affirmed At 'AAA/A-1+' On Criteria Revision; Outlook Stable

U.K. Life Insurer Scottish Equitable 'A+' Rating Affirmed; Outlook Remains Negative

Sales Tax Securitization Corporation of Chicago Chicago; Sales Tax

2017 State and Local Government Outlook. Copyright 2017 by S&P Global. All rights reserved.

Three Euler Hermes Companies Upgraded To 'AA' From 'AA-' Due To Revised Status Within The Allianz Group; Outlook Stable

U.K.-Based Housing Association Notting Hill Home Ownership Assigned 'AA' Rating; Outlook Stable

Asia-Pacific Credit Outlook 2017: Banks and Corporates

Illinois Housing Development Authority; Multifamily Whole Loan

R.V.I. Guaranty Co. Ltd. Upgraded To 'BBB+'; Outlook Stable

Research Update: Germany's Daimler AG Outlook Revised To Stable From Negative On Strengthening Credit Ratios; 'BBB+/A-2' Ratings Affirmed

Evaluating Sovereign Risk in Infrastructure Projects

Chubb Insurance Singapore Ltd.

Standard & Poor s Approach To Pension Liabilities In Light Of GASB 67 And 68

City of Windsor 'AA' Ratings Affirmed On Low Debt Burden And Exceptional Liquidity; Outlook Stable

Dell Inc. Corporate Credit Rating Affirmed; Outlook Revised To Positive On Debt Reduction Expectations

Territory of Yukon 'AA' Rating Affirmed On Exceptional Liquidity And Very Low Debt Burden

Bond Ratings 101. Minnesota Government Finance Officers Association. Arrowwood Resort Alexandria, Minnesota September 28, 2017

Eagle River Water & Sanitation District, Colorado; General Obligation

Marine Insurer The Swedish Club Outlook Revised To Positive On Continuing Solid Operating Performance; Ratings Affirmed

Dutch Energy Distribution Network Operator Enexis Holding N.V. Assigned 'A-1' Short-Term Rating

Mediobanca SpA. Primary Credit Analyst: Regina Argenio, Milan (39) ;

Oak Park Village, Illinois; General Obligation

City of Winnipeg 'AA' Ratings Affirmed; Outlook Remains Stable

African Reinsurance Corp. 'A-' Ratings Affirmed After Insurance Criteria Change; Outlook Stable

Dutch Bank LeasePlan 'BBB+/A-2' Ratings Placed On Watch Negative On Potential Ownership Change

Qatar-Based Doha Bank Assurance 'BBB+' Ratings Affirmed; Outlook Remains Negative

Research Update: Austria-Based KA Finanz 'A/A-1' Ratings Affirmed, Outlook Stable. Table Of Contents

Highmark Inc. Outlook Revised To Positive From Stable; 'A-' Ratings Affirmed

Spain-Based Banco Popular Espanol Ratings Raised To 'BBB+/A-2' On Acquisition By Santander; Outlook Positive

Vier Gas Transport GmbH (Open Grid Europe Group)

Ameritas Life Insurance Corp.

Transcription:

October 11, 2010 Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, California; Sales Tax Primary Credit Analyst: David G Hitchcock, New York (1) 212-438-2022; david_hitchcock@standardandpoors.com Secondary Credit Analyst: Gabriel Petek, CFA, San Francisco (1) 415-371-5042; gabriel_petek@standardandpoors.com Table Of Contents Rationale Outlook Leading Employers in Los Angeles County The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Related Criteria And Research www.standardandpoors.com/ratingsdirect 1

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, California; Sales Tax Credit Profile US$604.6 mil sr sales tax rev bnds (taxable babs) (Measure R) ser 2010A due 04/01/2039 Long Term Rating AAA/Stable New US$133.86 mil sr sales tax rev bnds (Tax-exempt) (Measure R) ser 2010B due 04/01/2018 Long Term Rating AAA/Stable New Rationale Standard & Poor's Ratings Services has assigned its 'AAA' long-term rating, with a stable outlook, to Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA), Calif.'s $738.46 million Measure R senior sales tax revenue bonds, series 2010A (taxable Build America bonds) and series 2010B (tax-exempt). A gross first-lien on Measure R sales and use tax revenues, less costs of collection and 15% of revenues allocated to local governments, secures the bonds. Collection of Measure R sales taxes, approved by county voters in 2008, began on July 1, 2009, and is scheduled to expire on June 30, 2039. Measure R sales taxes are collected at a rate of 0.5% on retail sales throughout Los Angeles County. The authority will issue the series 2010-A bonds as taxable Build America bonds eligible for a 35% federal interest subsidy. The federal interest subsidy is not pledged to the bonds, but the LACMTA intends to use actual receipts of the interest subsidy as an offset to the need to make future debt service fund deposits. The rating on Measure-R-supported sales tax debt reflects our opinion of: The deep and diverse Los Angeles County economy, with a growing population of 10.39 million residents; Very strong 10.6x maximum annual debt service (MADS) coverage based on the most recent 12 months' collection of historical pledged revenues; A strong 2.5x additional parity bonds test (ABT), which offsets significant future bonding plans; and Recent pro forma decreases in pledged revenue of 9.2% in fiscal 2009 and 9.9% in 2010, balanced against two recent quarters of increasing sales taxes. Separately, LACMTA collects an additional 0.5% sales tax pursuant to Proposition A, approved by voters in 1980, and issues bonds secured by Proposition A revenues (rated 'AAA') under a different indenture. Those bonds have a 2.46x ABT. In addition, LACMTA also collects another 0.5% sales tax pursuant to Proposition C, approved by the voters in 1990, which separately secures bonds issued under another indenture (rated 'AA+'). Proposition C bonds have a 1.3x ABT. Proposition A and C sales tax revenues are not pledged to the Measure R sales tax bonds. The state estimates the population of Los Angeles County (issuer credit rating 'AA-') at 10.39 million as of 2009, up 1.7% over the previous three years. In our view, county employment is diverse, with 15.4% of 2009 county employment in wholesale and retail trade, 15.7% in government, 10.2% in manufacturing, 10.0% in leisure and hospitality, 10.5% in health care and social assistance, and 6.5% in professional services (according to county figures). We believe the county is experiencing an economic downturn, as evidenced by an unadjusted county Standard & Poor s RatingsDirect on the Global Credit Portal October 11, 2010 2

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, California; Sales Tax unemployment rate of 13.0% as of August 2010, above the August 2010 unadjusted state unemployment rate of 12.4% and the national rate of 9.5%, according to the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics. However, county median home prices, which had taken, in our view, a large 42.8% drop from 2007 to the first quarter of 2009, rose 9.1% in the second quarter of 2010 compared with same period the previous year. County median household effective buying income was good at 105.6% of the national level in 2009, while per capita effective buying income was 96.6%. County sales tax collections have been falling for the past three fiscal years. Although Measure R revenues have only been collected for one year, they are collected by the state on substantially the same basis and rates as the Proposition C sales tax, providing a pro forma historical record of county sales tax collections. In the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010, Proposition C revenue fell 9.9% on an accrual basis, after falling 9.2% in fiscal 2009 and 0.4% in fiscal 2008. Previously, Proposition C sales taxes rose 2.6% in 2007, 8.0% in 2006, and 7.4% in 2005. Measure R sales tax collections were reduced in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 by the start-up lag in collection of receipts, as the tax first began to be implemented. However, collections for the 12 months beginning the second quarter of fiscal 2009 through the second quarter of fiscal 2010, produced pledged cash basis revenue of $537.1 million, after the deduction of the 15% local allocation, providing, in our view, very strong 10.6x coverage of MADS on the Measure R bonds to be outstanding after this sale, and even higher if the federal interest subsidy were included as a pledged revenue. LACMTA reports that fiscal 2011 Proposition C cash basis sales tax collections in the quarters ending March 31, June 30, and Sept. 30 decreased 5.6%, increased 1.9%, and increased 4.2%, respectively compared with the same period a year earlier, indicating, in our opinion, that fiscal 2011 could see a small increase in pledged sales taxes. Currently, Measure R sales taxes are projected by LACMTA to generate $35 billion cumulatively through 2040. LACMTA plans to use 60% of this for capital purposes, 25% for operations, and 15% for local transportation. LACMTA expects to issue about $2.7 billion of Measure-R-secured debt in the first decade of the program, but it does not plan to issue additional new money Measure R sales tax debt for the next three to four years. In our opinion, the large size of the potential capital program is offset by what we view as a restrictive ABT, which requires historical revenues for 12 of the most recent 18 months immediately preceding the issuance debt to cover MADS 2.5x. For purposes of calculating the ABT, the indenture allows the deduction of the federal interest subsidy from the calculation of debt service; however, the federal interest subsidy is not pledged to debt service. Also, for purposes of the ABT, the definition of MADS excludes principal payments and related interest payments that LACMTA designates it plans to refund with a future issue of bonds or to retire from nonpledged revenues, such as a federal grant or other sources that, in the authority's opinion, it may rely on. The definition of MADS for purposes of the additional bonds test also assumes that interest rates on variable-rate debt are either the average of the previous five years or adjusted for interest rate swap agreements and excludes the principal amount of "put" tender options for additional parity debt. However, the current issue of debt consists of all fixed rate debt with a level amortization. The lack of a debt service reserve is offset, in our opinion, by the high debt service coverage and restrictive ABT. The indenture allows the LACMTA the opportunity to add a debt service reserve for future series of debt, if it so chooses. After scheduled monthly payments of pledged revenue to a fund to pay debt service and related expenses, excess pledged revenues may be used by LACMTA for any lawful purpose. www.standardandpoors.com/ratingsdirect 3

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, California; Sales Tax Outlook The stable outlook reflects Standard & Poor's expectation that the breadth of economic activity within Los Angeles County should continue to support what we view as strong coverage levels, even if there are moderate further decreases in pledged revenue. In addition, we anticipate that the strong additional bonds test will help maintain a minimum level of strong coverage despite the LACMTA's substantial future bonding plans. The rating also reflects our expectation that debt service coverage will not be diluted below 2.5x by LACMTA issuance of parity debt outside the definition of MADS because LACMTA expects to retire such debt from future grants or other nonpledged revenue sources. Leading Employers in Los Angeles County The deep and diverse Los Angeles County economy includes significant health care, international trade, defense, education, tourism, entertainment, and financial service activity. The 10 largest private sector employers include Kaiser Permanente (34,179 employees in Los Angeles County), Northrup Grumman Corp. (19.137), Boeing (14,400), Kroger Co. (14,000), University of Southern California (13,044), Target Corp. (13,000), the Home Depot (10,000), Providence Health & Services (9,715), Vons (9,688), and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (9,300), according to the county. Other notable employers include Wells Fargo (9,100), AT&T Inc. (8,950), California Institute of Technology (8,504), Amgen (6,500), and JP Morgan Chase (4,700). The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority The LACMTA was established in 1993 as the successor to the Southern California Rapid Transit District and the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission. It serves as the transportation planner, designer, builder, and operator for the county for bus, rail, highway, and commuter rail activities in the county. Its governing board consists of 13 voting members, including the five Los Angeles County board of supervisors, the mayor of the city of Los Angeles and one city councilman, two public members, and four members from cities other than Los Angeles. It operates more than 2,400 buses, five light rail lines, and commuter rail to surrounding counties and finances highway improvements. Related Criteria And Research USPF Criteria: Special Tax Bonds, June 13, 2007 Standard & Poor s RatingsDirect on the Global Credit Portal October 11, 2010 4

Copyright 2010 by Standard & Poor's Financial,<FONT COLOR="BLUE">Services LLC (S&P)</FONT>, a subsidiary of The McGraw-Hill Companies, No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of S&P. The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P, its affiliates, and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions, regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an "as is" basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT'S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages. Credit-related analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P's opinions and analyses do not address the suitability of any security. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process. S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain credit-related analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees. www.standardandpoors.com/ratingsdirect 5