PART B Details of ICT collections

Similar documents
Community Survey on ICT usage in households and by individuals 2010 Metadata / Quality report

Sweden 2000: Survey Information

PRESS RELEASE INCOME INEQUALITY

The coverage of young children in demographic surveys

FINAL QUALITY REPORT EU-SILC

Public Health Monograph Series No. 28 ISSN

Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia FINAL QUALITY REPORT RELATING TO EU-SILC OPERATIONS

Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia INTERMEDIATE QUALITY REPORT EU-SILC 2011 OPERATION IN LATVIA

Current Population Survey (CPS)

Response Mode and Bias Analysis in the IRS Individual Taxpayer Burden Survey

Special Survey s Division Division des enquêtes spéciales Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0T6. Microdata User's Guide. Survey of 1981 Work History

CYPRUS FINAL QUALITY REPORT

Labour force, Employment and Unemployment First quarter 2018

RESEARCH NZ TRUST & CONFIDENCE POLL

CYPRUS FINAL QUALITY REPORT

CYPRUS FINAL QUALITY REPORT

A Profile of Payday Loans Consumers Based on the 2014 Canadian Financial Capability Survey. Wayne Simpson. Khan Islam*

The American Panel Survey. Study Description and Technical Report Public Release 1 November 2013

LABOUR FORCE EMBARGO: 11.30AM (CANBERRA TIME) THURS 13 JUL 2006 F I G U R E S TREND ESTIMATES (MONTHLY CHANGE)

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Household Component Statistical Estimation Issues. Copyright 2007, Steven R. Machlin,

THE CAYMAN ISLANDS LABOUR FORCE SURVEY REPORT SPRING 2017

CONSUMPTION POVERTY IN THE REPUBLIC OF KOSOVO April 2017

Injury Statistics Work-related Claims: 2008

Labour force, Employment and Unemployment First quarter 2017

Usual Resident Population Count , , ,253. Usual Resident Population Change , % ,

Guide for Investigators. The American Panel Survey (TAPS)

Final Quality report for the Swedish EU-SILC. The longitudinal component

Injury Statistics Work-related Claims: 2011

THE CAYMAN ISLANDS LABOUR FORCE SURVEY REPORT FALL. Published March 2017

Introduction to Survey Weights for National Adult Tobacco Survey. Sean Hu, MD., MS., DrPH. Office on Smoking and Health

Community Survey on ICT usage in households and by individuals Quality report

Final Quality report for the Swedish EU-SILC. The longitudinal component. (Version 2)

Design of a Multi-Stage Stratified Sample for Poverty and Welfare Monitoring with Multiple Objectives

INCOME DISTRIBUTION DATA REVIEW SPAIN 1. Available data sources used for reporting on income inequality and poverty

A brave new world. CDANZ 9 May Shamubeel Eaqub, CFA fb.me/seaqub

Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES) Module 4: Design Report (Sample Design and Data Collection Report) September 10, 2012

SMEs in New Zealand: Structure and Dynamics 2011

(Revised version: 4th September 2013) INCOME DISTRIBUTION DATA REVIEW - TURKEY 1

Survey Methodology. - Lasse Sluth, - Søren Kühl,

1 Preface. Sample Design

Day 1, Session 3, UN Workshop on Improving the Intergation of a Gender Perspective inti Official Chiba, Japan April 2013

Original data included. The datasets harmonised are:

PERCEPTIONS OF EXTREME WEATHER AND CLIMATE CHANGE IN VIRGINIA

Chile. A: Identification. B: CPI Coverage. Title of the CPI: IPC base 2009 = 100. Organisation responsible: Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas

ECONOMIC INEQUALITIES IN HEALTH

Understanding the Margin of Errors and the Coefficient of Variance in the American Community Survey U.S. Census Bureau Workshop at SACOG

Ministry of Economic Development SMEs in New Zealand: Structure and Dynamics

Final Quality Report. Survey on Income and Living Conditions Spain (Spanish ECV 2010)

CONTENTS. I) IMPROVEMENTS ON THE BASIC INDICATORS OF THE YEARS 2002 & Text II) THE RESULTS OF THE YEAR Text

Dynamics of Income and Deprivation in New Zealand,

1. The Armenian Integrated Living Conditions Survey

Final Quality Report. Survey on Income and Living Conditions Spain (Spanish ECV 2009)

Random Group Variance Adjustments When Hot Deck Imputation Is Used to Compensate for Nonresponse 1

Insolvency Statistics and Debtor Profile Report 1 JULY 2013 TO 30 JUNE 2014

Sample Design of the National Population Health Survey

Israel Review on Social Indicators in the Mediterranean region

Description of the Sample and Limitations of the Data

Labour Market Statistics: June 2017 quarter

COUNTRY REPORT - MAURITIUS

Unemployment rate fell in November compared with one year earlier

Impressions of Canadians on US Election and presidential candidates. National survey released November 2016 Project NANOS SURVEY

Injury Statistics Work-related Claims: 2009

Intermediate Quality Report for the Swedish EU-SILC, The 2007 cross-sectional component

Aspects of Sample Allocation in Business Surveys

Economic Standard of Living

A Report on Changes in New Zealanders Opinions about Key National Issues

District Demographic Profile: Forest Heath

Economic Standard of Living

Results from the 2009 Virgin Islands Health Insurance Survey

Canadians opinions on the impact of international trade agreements on the Canadian economy Nanos Trade Survey Summary

Economic Standard of Living

10. Hundertwasser Art Centre Survey

Correcting for non-response bias using socio-economic register data

International Workshop on Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) Indicators Beijing, China June 2018

P R E S S R E L E A S E Risk of poverty

Discussion paper 1 Comparative labour statistics Labour force survey: first round pilot February 2000

Mission Report for a short-term mission of the specialist in sampling for household surveys From 10 to 31 October 2015 David J.

THE VALUE OF AN INVESTMENT & INSURANCE CUSTOMER TO A BANK

Field Operations, Interview Protocol & Survey Weighting

LOCALLY ADMINISTERED SALES AND USE TAXES A REPORT PREPARED FOR THE INSTITUTE FOR PROFESSIONALS IN TAXATION

NATIONAL EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL OFFICE. QUALITY REPORT on the Structure of Earnings Survey 2006 in Hungary

Applications of Data Analysis (EC969) Simonetta Longhi and Alita Nandi (ISER) Contact: slonghi and

The economic value and impacts of informal care in New Zealand. For Carers NZ and the NZ Carers Alliance

Insolvency Statistics and Debtor Profile Report 1 JULY 2014 TO 30 JUNE 2015

LISA, Anticipating the Next Generation of Longitudinal Data

Efficiency and Distribution of Variance of the CPS Estimate of Month-to-Month Change

Auckland Region Socio-Demographic Profile Report prepared for the Auckland Region by Professor Natalie Jackson

Insolvency Statistics and Debtor Profile Report 1 JULY 2015 TO 30 JUNE 2016

Comparison of Income Items from the CPS and ACS

INTERMEDIATE QUALITY REPORT

Insolvency Statistics and Debtor Profile Report 1 JULY 2016 TO 30 JUNE 2017

Projections for Palmerston North

Quality Report. The Labour Cost Survey Norway

GTSS. Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) Sample Weights Manual

Registered voters Gender Age (4 category) Race (4 category)

questions for written response

Views on Canada s role in peacekeeping missions. National survey released October, 2016 Project NANOS SURVEY NANOS SURVEY

2006 Family Income and Expenditure Survey (Final Results)

Standard Report on Methods and Quality. for the Labour Force Survey (LFS)

HELLENIC REPUBLIC HELLENIC STATISTICAL AUTHORITY

Transcription:

PART B Details of ICT collections Name of collection: Household Use of Information and Communication Technology 2006 Survey Nature of collection If possible, use the classification of collection types shown above e.g. ICT use collection business. For other collections, provide details e.g. Other ICT collection ISPs. Collection agency General references to collection material Metadata, questionnaires etc Survey basis or vehicle E.g. Labour Force supplement, standalone survey, administrative byproduct data ICT use collection Household/individual Statistics New Zealand Frequency of collection Two-yearly from 2006. Collection history Reference dates and/or periods from the first to the latest collection Whether collection is mandatory or voluntary Scope and coverage of collection Target population in terms of size, industry, population groups etc The Household Use of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Survey will collect information on New Zealand households and individuals access and use of ICTs this includes the Internet, computers and mobile phones. As the questionnaire is in electronic format, there is no official paper based questionnaire however attached is a list of questions and routings used in the survey: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/60/60/40025947.pdf Supplement to Household Labour Force Survey (HLFS). No previous collection. Some isolated data are collected in the 5 yearly Census of Dwellings and Individuals. Mandatory The Household Use of ICT Survey: 2006 was a supplement to the Household Labour Force Survey (HLFS) during the December 2006 quarter. The supplement was asked of all households and people eligible to take part in the HLFS. Two questionnaires were used. A household ICT questionnaire asked about that household s access to computers and to the Internet. An individual ICT questionnaire was then asked of all eligible individuals within the HLFS sample. Proxy responses were not accepted for the ICT questionnaires. The survey was carried out from 8 October 2006 to 6 January 2007 (the December 2006 quarter) via personal and telephone interviews. The target population for the Household Use of ICT Survey is the same as the HLFS target population. This is the civilian, usually resident, non-institutionalised population aged 15 years and over. This means that the statistics in this release do not cover long-term residents of homes for older people, hospitals and psychiatric institutions; inmates of penal institutions; members of the permanent armed forces; members of the non-new Zealand armed forces; overseas diplomats; overseas visitors who expect to be resident in

New Zealand for less than 12 months; and those aged under 15 years. The target population for the household portion of the survey is all households from the scope outlined above with at least one eligible individual. The HLFS sample contains about 15,000 private households and about 30,000 individuals each quarter. Households are sampled on a statistically representative basis from rural and urban areas throughout New Zealand, and information is obtained for each member of the household. Main classifications used E.g. industry, size, commodity, occupation In the classifications used, HLFS refers to the Statistics New Zealand Household Labour Force Survey. Age in Years Age - 5 Year Groupings Australian and New Zealand Standard Industrial Classification Employment Districts New Zealand Standard Classification of Ethnicity HLFS Relationship to Occupier/Reference Person Classification HLFS Age Groups - 5 year intervals HLFS Country of Birth HLFS Eligibility Status HLFS Ethnic Group Household Labour Force Survey Family Codes HLFS Full-time Part-time code HLFS Personal Participation Code HLFS Yes/No Indicator HLFS Interview Mode Codes HLFS Labour Force Status HLFS Local Government Region HLFS Month in Quarter HLFS Marital Status HLFS Household Participation Code HLFS.Q18 - Reason why not working normal hours HLFS.Q19 - Yes/No/Don't Know indicator HLFS.Q20 - Reason not working more hours HLFS.Q21 - Main job type HLFS.Q30 - Qualifications since school HLFS.Q31 - Qualifications since leaving school HLFS.Q51 - When starting new job HLFS.Q53 - Activity last week HLFS.Q54 - If offered a job would have started HLFS.Q55 - Main reason looking for work HLFS.Q57 - When to start looking for work HLFS.Q58 - What done in last 4 weeks HLFS.Q63 - Why not available to work last week HLFS.Q64 - How long since worked HLFS.Q65 - What doing in last job HLFS.Q70 - Why left last job HLFS - Relationship to reference person codes HLFS Scope Codes OECD ICT STATISTICS METADATA QUESTIONNAIRE Page 2 of 5

New Zealand Standard Institutional Sector Classification New Zealand Standard Classification of Occupations Collection methodology E.g. face-to-face, mail, Web, telephone interview Reporting and Statistical units Enterprise, establishment, household, etc Sample frame used Around one eighth of the interviews were conducted face to face using Computer Aided Personal Interviewing (CAPI), with centralised Computer Aided Telephone Interviewing (CATI) used for the remaining respondents. Household and individual Sample of all households in New Zealand see scope and coverage. Stratification The total land area of the North and South Islands is divided into 37,000 meshblocks. These meshblocks are collapsed into 19,100 primary sampling units (PSUs). PSUs are divided into 120 groups or strata according to various characteristics derived from the last Census. There are two stages in the stratification procedure: Sampling method E.g. stratified random sampling, cluster sampling Sample size For the most recent collection Response rate The responding proportion of the live in-scope Super-stratification New Zealand is divided into 14 regions, based on Regional Council Authorities. The Regional Council Authorities are divided into rural and non-rural strata. These strata are divided into high and low Maori population strata. A high Maori stratum is defined as a stratum with a Maori population of 15% or more. Auckland and Wellington are also divided into high and low Pacific Island population strata. Auckland, Wellington and Christchurch also contained a high and low Asian population breakdown. A total of 56 super-strata are formed. Sub-stratification The super-strata are stratified further by clustering PSUs on the basis of a number of socio-economic variables (e.g. geographic region, age, family type, ethnicity, education, employment status and amenities) to form the final set of 120 strata. The particular variables used varied from region to region. There are 1,760 PSUs selected and sampled each quarter for the lifetime of the design. Each PSU is allocated to one of eight rotation groups. One-eighth of the sample, or one rotation group, is replaced every quarter with new dwellings from the same PSU. At the end of any quarter one rotation group will have been in the survey for one quarter, another for two quarters, another for three quarters, and so on until the last rotation group has been in the survey for its eighth and final quarter. This means there is always an overlap of seven-eighths of the sample from one survey quarter to the next. This improves the quarterly estimates of changes in the labour force. 15,000 households, 30,000 individuals The target response rate for the Household Use of ICT Survey 2006 was 75 percent. The achieved response rate for households was 94 percent of those households which OECD ICT STATISTICS METADATA QUESTIONNAIRE Page 3 of 5

population, most recent collection Methods for dealing with non-response (item and unit) Indicate whether imputations are made for nonresponse and a short description of methods used. Weighting of results Weighting method e.g. by employment, number of enterprises, revenue Relative standard errors (or coefficients of variation) on main aggregates For the most recent collection. These can be expressed as a range of values. For a given variable, the RSE or CV is equal to the ratio of the square root of the estimate of the sampling variance to the estimated value. It can be expressed as a fraction or a percentage. Known data quality issues with this collection E.g. non-response bias, comparability problems over time, definitional issues, coverage deficiencies, timeliness of frame, high item nonresponse (identify topics which are particularly problematic). Output details Please list (or link to) relevant publications for completed the HLFS (13,757 households). The achieved rate for individuals was 89 percent, or 24,855 of those individuals who completed the HLFS personal questionnaire. No follow-up contact was made with respondents. Weighting was used to impute for unit non-response based on household and individual benchmarks for the New Zealand population. Nearest neighbour imputation was used to calculate item non response for two individual-questionnaire questions to allow for derivation of household access to mobile phones and household income. Integrated weights were used to adjust the weights of all the individuals within a household to have the same weight. This is done so that household estimates could be calculated. Sampling errors are calculated for each cell in the published tables. For example, the estimated total number of households with access to the Internet in the December 2006 quarter was 1,011,000. This estimate is subject to a sampling error of plus or minus 15,000 or 1 percent (measured at the 95 percent confidence level). This means that we can be 95 percent confident that the true number of households with access to the Internet lies between 996,000 and 1,026,000. Smaller estimates, such as the total number of rural centre households with access to the Internet in the December 2006 quarter (20,000), are subject to larger relative sampling errors than larger estimates. This estimate is subject to a sampling error of plus or minus 7,000 or 8 percent (measured at the 95 percent confidence level). This means that we are 95 percent confident that the true value of rural centre households with access to the Internet lies between 13,000 and 27,000. For households, all geographic areas of New Zealand are represented. For individuals, the groups that are excluded from the survey sample are: those living in non-private dwellings, long-term residents of old people s homes, hospitals and psychiatric institutions; inmates of penal institutions; members of the permanent armed forces; members of the non-new Zealand armed forces; overseas diplomats; overseas visitors who expect to be resident in New Zealand for less than 12 months; those aged under 15 years of age; and people living on offshore islands (except for Waiheke Island). Although no one less than 15 is interviewed, individual demographics are collected. Those over 65 are asked a shorter number of questions for the HLFS questionnaire, but the ICT questionnaires are identical for all members of the target population. The retirement age in NZ is currently 65. Young males tend to be under-represented because their high mobility makes them difficult to get hold of. A Hot off the Press publication was released on 27 April 2007 and can be accessed here: OECD ICT STATISTICS METADATA QUESTIONNAIRE Page 4 of 5

this collection. You can also email relevant files to the OECD. Other comments Contact/s Where available, provide names and email addresses. http://www.stats.govt.nz/products-and-services/mediareleases/household-use-of-information-and-communicationtechnologies-survey-2006/household-use-ict-06-mr.htm None. Stephanie.Cropp@stats.govt.nz OECD ICT STATISTICS METADATA QUESTIONNAIRE Page 5 of 5