Hidden in Plain Sight: Equity Price Discovery with Informed Private Debt

Similar documents
Hidden in Plain Sight: Equity Price Discovery with Informed Private Debt

Size Matters, if You Control Your Junk

Daily Winners and Losers by Alok Kumar, Stefan Ruenzi, and Michael Ungeheuer

Betting against Beta or Demand for Lottery

Revisiting Idiosyncratic Volatility and Stock Returns. Fatma Sonmez 1

What Does Risk-Neutral Skewness Tell Us About Future Stock Returns? Supplementary Online Appendix

Online Appendix for Overpriced Winners

Internet Appendix to Leverage Constraints and Asset Prices: Insights from Mutual Fund Risk Taking

Volatility Appendix. B.1 Firm-Specific Uncertainty and Aggregate Volatility

Common Risk Factors in the Cross-Section of Corporate Bond Returns

This paper investigates whether realized and implied volatilities of individual stocks can predict the crosssectional

Debt/Equity Ratio and Asset Pricing Analysis

Decimalization and Illiquidity Premiums: An Extended Analysis

Internet Appendix. Table A1: Determinants of VOIB

Implied Funding Liquidity

High Idiosyncratic Volatility and Low Returns. Andrew Ang Columbia University and NBER. Q Group October 2007, Scottsdale AZ

Is Information Risk Priced for NASDAQ-listed Stocks?

Do Retail Trades Move Markets? Brad Barber Terrance Odean Ning Zhu

Cross Sectional Variation of Stock Returns: Idiosyncratic Risk and Liquidity

Liquidity and IPO performance in the last decade

Appendix Tables for: A Flow-Based Explanation for Return Predictability. Dong Lou London School of Economics

Asubstantial portion of the academic

Trading Costs of Asset Pricing Anomalies

Online Appendix. Arbitrage Asymmetry and the Idiosyncratic Volatility Puzzle

Liquidity skewness premium

A Lottery Demand-Based Explanation of the Beta Anomaly. Online Appendix

Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance: Analysis of Holdings Returns

Does market liquidity explain the idiosyncratic volatility puzzle in the Chinese stock market?

Finansavisen A case study of secondary dissemination of insider trade notifications

Optimal Debt-to-Equity Ratios and Stock Returns

Liquidity Risk and Bank Stock Returns. June 16, 2017

Should Benchmark Indices Have Alpha? Revisiting Performance Evaluation. Martijn Cremers (Yale) Antti Petajisto (Yale) Eric Zitzewitz (Dartmouth)

In Search of Distress Risk

Market Frictions, Price Delay, and the Cross-Section of Expected Returns

Internet Appendix to The Booms and Busts of Beta Arbitrage

Volatility Jump Risk in the Cross-Section of Stock Returns. Yu Li University of Houston. September 29, 2017

Internet Appendix for The Joint Cross Section of Stocks and Options *

Problem Set 4 Solutions

The Idiosyncratic Volatility Puzzle: A Behavioral Explanation

The New Issues Puzzle

Smart Beta #

Measuring Performance with Factor Models

Dispersion in Analysts Earnings Forecasts and Credit Rating

Internet Appendix to Is Information Risk Priced? Evidence from Abnormal Idiosyncratic Volatility

Investment Performance of Common Stock in Relation to their Price-Earnings Ratios: BASU 1977 Extended Analysis

Further Test on Stock Liquidity Risk With a Relative Measure

MUTUAL FUND PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS PRE AND POST FINANCIAL CRISIS OF 2008

Betting Against Beta

Does the Stock Market Fully Value Intangibles? Employee Satisfaction and Equity Prices

Trading Costs of Asset Pricing Anomalies Appendix: Additional Empirical Results

Appendix. A. Firm-Specific DeterminantsofPIN, PIN_G, and PIN_B

Liquidity Creation as Volatility Risk

The Liquidity Style of Mutual Funds

Internet Appendix for Arbitrage Asymmetry and the Idiosyncratic Volatility Puzzle *

DOES ACADEMIC RESEARCH DESTROY STOCK RETURN PREDICTABILITY?

The High Idiosyncratic Volatility Low Return Puzzle

Online Appendix What Does Health Reform Mean for the Healthcare Industry? Evidence from the Massachusetts Special Senate Election.

Supplementary Appendix for Outsourcing Mutual Fund Management: Firm Boundaries, Incentives and Performance

Internet Appendix for: Change You Can Believe In? Hedge Fund Data Revisions

Variation in Liquidity and Costly Arbitrage

The Effect of Kurtosis on the Cross-Section of Stock Returns

Does Transparency Increase Takeover Vulnerability?

The Good News in Short Interest: Ekkehart Boehmer, Zsuzsa R. Huszar, Bradford D. Jordan 2009 Revisited

Asset Pricing Anomalies and Financial Distress

Appendix. In this Appendix, we present the construction of variables, data source, and some empirical procedures.

Is Economic Uncertainty Priced in the Cross-Section of Stock Returns?

The Liquidity Style of Mutual Funds

Online Appendix for. Short-Run and Long-Run Consumption Risks, Dividend Processes, and Asset Returns

Is Stock Return Predictability of Option-implied Skewness Affected by the Market State?

Liquidity and Return Reversals

A Tough Act to Follow: Contrast Effects in Financial Markets. Samuel Hartzmark University of Chicago. May 20, 2016

Online Appendix to. The Structure of Information Release and the Factor Structure of Returns


Idiosyncratic volatility and stock returns: evidence from Colombia. Introduction and literature review

Asset Pricing in the Dark: The Cross Section of OTC Stocks

Returns, Volatility, and Information Transmission Dynamics in Public and Private Real Estate Markets

Robert Engle and Robert Ferstenberg Microstructure in Paris December 8, 2014

Daily Data is Bad for Beta: Opacity and Frequency-Dependent Betas Online Appendix

Income Inequality and Stock Pricing in the U.S. Market

Liquidity Creation as Volatility Risk

An Online Appendix of Technical Trading: A Trend Factor

Core CFO and Future Performance. Abstract

Treasury Illiquidity and Funding Liquidity Risk

FF hoped momentum would go away, but it didn t, so the standard factor model became the four-factor model, = ( )= + ( )+ ( )+ ( )+ ( )

Changes in Analysts' Recommendations and Abnormal Returns. Qiming Sun. Bachelor of Commerce, University of Calgary, 2011.

Problem Set 7 Part I Short answer questions on readings. Note, if I don t provide it, state which table, figure, or exhibit backs up your point

Corporate bond liquidity before and after the onset of the subprime crisis. Jens Dick-Nielsen Peter Feldhütter David Lando. Copenhagen Business School

Is Default Risk Priced in Equity Returns?

Characterizing the Risk of IPO Long-Run Returns: The Impact of Momentum, Liquidity, Skewness, and Investment

Maxing Out: Stocks as Lotteries and the Cross-Section of Expected Returns

What Does Risk-Neutral Skewness Tell Us About Future Stock Returns?

Variation in Liquidity, Costly Arbitrage, and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns

A Comparison of the Results in Barber, Odean, and Zhu (2006) and Hvidkjaer (2006)

Corporate bond liquidity before and after the onset of the subprime crisis. Jens Dick-Nielsen Peter Feldhütter David Lando. Copenhagen Business School

Differential Pricing Effects of Volatility on Individual Equity Options

Anomalies and Liquidity

The Cross-Section of Credit Risk Premia and Equity Returns

Problem Set p.20, Figure How does the behavior of opportunistic traders contrast with those of HFT and intermediaries?

Interpreting factor models

The Finansavisen Inside Portfolio

Transcription:

Hidden in Plain Sight: Equity Price Discovery with Informed Private Debt Jawad M. Addoum 1 Justin R. Murfin 2 1 Cornell University 2 Yale University Chicago Financial Institutions Conference 2018 April 6, 2018 Syndicated Loans and Stock Returns CFIC 2018 1 / 18

Introduction Motivation Motivation: Longstanding Question in Finance How is information about firm value embedded in one security transmitted across markets/asset classes with diverse participants? Cross-listed equity: Gagnon and Karolyi (2010) Derivatives and equity: Easley, O Hara, and Srinivas (1998), etc. Bonds and equity: Kwan (1996), Hotchkiss and Ronen (2002) CDS and equity: Longstaff et al. (2005), Acharya and Johnson (2007) Generally think of modern markets in the U.S. as being well-integrated This paper: We show this is not necessarily the case Use the syndicated loan market as a laboratory to document the transmission of private information into markets for related public claims (equity) Document economically important predictability: Long Short alphas of 1.4 2.2% per month Explore the frictions to market integration Syndicated Loans and Stock Returns CFIC 2018 2 / 18

Introduction Syndicated Loan Market Why Syndicated Loans? Investors include banks, finance companies, and institutional investors Investors can choose to be on the public or private side Private investors receive monthly disclosures detailing covenant compliance, amendment requests, financial projections, acquisition plans, and monthly financial statements Private investors cannot trade in both loans and stocks Public investors commit to receiving only public information Beginning in 1998, increasing liquidity of loans as an asset class generated demand for mark-to-market pricing LSTA began aggregating quotes reported by dealer desks Majority of dealers are on the private side Price quotes may incorporate information that is not yet publicly available Research question: Do syndicated loan market quotes reveal private information useful in predicting stock returns? Syndicated Loans and Stock Returns CFIC 2018 3 / 18

Introduction Anecdotal Result Anecdotal Result May 6, 2012: Green Mountain s loan facility starts trading with Bid of 96 Jan 14, 2014: Bid on loan jumps to 97.5 (after no prior movement) Feb 5, 2014: GMCR closes at $80.88, 10-year agreement with Coca-Cola announced after close Feb 6, 2014: GMCR opens at $110.00, closes at $102.10 Feb 28, 2014: GMCR closes month at $109.78, up 35.5% from beginning-of-month price ($81.00) Syndicated Loans and Stock Returns CFIC 2018 4 / 18

Main Questions Key Findings Main Questions and Key Findings 1. Do syndicated loan market quotes reveal private information useful in predicting stock returns? Long Short strategy generating 1.4 2.2% per month 2. What is the friction preventing value-relevant information from being incorporated into stock prices? Attention vs. expertise Pricing lag persists even when loan returns publicly reported in WSJ However, trading strategy cannot survive development of cross-market funds with expertise in loans and equity Big picture takeaway: market integration occurs when portfolios/trading desks are integrated Syndicated Loans and Stock Returns CFIC 2018 5 / 18

Data Data Sources Data Sources Monthly Syndicated Loan Returns Source: Loan Syndications and Trading Association (LSTA) Mark-to-Market Pricing Data Period: September 1998 - August 2015 Monthly Stock Returns Source: Center for Research on Security Prices (CRSP) Matched to syndicated loans using Chava and Roberts Dealscan-Compustat links extended through 2015 Quarterly Mutual Fund Holdings: Stocks and Syndicated Loans Source: CRSP Mutual Fund Database, Holdings Table Period: September 2010 - June 2015 Syndicated Loans and Stock Returns CFIC 2018 6 / 18

Main Results Portfolio Formation Each month t, for each stock i with a syndicated loan outstanding: Calculate SyndLoanReturn i,t = (MidQuote i,t MidQuote i,t 1 )/MidQuote i,t 1 Sort all stocks on SyndLoanReturni,t into quintiles Long high SyndLoanReturn stocks, short low SyndLoanReturn stocks Hold for one month, until end of month t + 1, and repeat Syndicated Loans and Stock Returns CFIC 2018 7 / 18

lphas, as well as 3, 6, and 8-factor alphas for each of the portfolios. The 3-factor model includes the excess market return (RMRF), the value actor (HML), and the size factor (SMB). The 6-factor model Main adds Results the momentum Performance factor (UMD) Evaluation as well as the short- and long-term reversal factors STR and LTR). Finally, the 8-factor model further includes the liquidity (LIQ) and betting against beta (BAB) factors. The t-statistics reported n parentheses below the coefficient estimates are computed using Newey and West (1987) adjusted standard errors. Performance: Raw and Risk-Adjusted alue Weighted Portfolio Returns. This table reports performance estimates of a trading strategy that sorts stocks on matched non-zero loa able 3 eturns into quintiles. We report the performance of six value-weighted portfolios: (i) the Short portfolio contains the quintile of stocks with th Equal-weighted strategy Raw Return CAPM Alpha 3-factor Alpha 6-factor Alpha 8-factor Alpha west observed loan returns, (ii) the Long portfolio contains the quintile of stocks with the highest observed loan returns, (iii) the Long Short ortfolio, which captures the difference in returns of the Long and Short portfolios, and (iv)-(vi) portfolios 2-4, which contain the second throug 1 (Short) -0.535-1.289-1.527-1.259-1.289 urth quintiles, respectively, of stocks sorted on observed loan returns. We report the raw returns for each of the portfolios. We also report CAPM lphas, as well as 3, 6, and 8-factor alphas for (-0.75) each of the portfolios. (-3.26) The 3-factor (-3.59) model includes (-3.71) the excess market (-3.54) return (RMRF), the valu ctor (HML), and 2 the size factor (SMB). The 6-factor 0.922 model adds 0.352 the momentum 0.116 factor (UMD) as well 0.230 as the short- and 0.185 long-term reversal factor TR and LTR). Finally, the 8-factor model further (1.77) includes the(0.91) liquidity (LIQ) and (0.39) betting against(0.78) beta (BAB) factors. (0.58) The t-statistics reporte parentheses below 3 the coefficient estimates are0.926 computed using0.358 Newey and West 0.188 (1987) adjusted 0.280 standard errors. 0.163 (1.75) (1.06) (0.62) (0.88) (0.58) able 3 4 1.052 0.469 0.233 0.308 0.245 alue Weighted Portfolio Returns. This table reports performance estimates of a trading strategy that sorts stocks on matched non-zero loa (1.88) (1.54) (0.81) (1.05) (0.81) turns into quintiles. We report the performance of six value-weighted portfolios: (i) the Short portfolio contains the quintile of stocks with th 5 Value-weighted (Long) strategy Raw1.580 Return CAPM 0.964 Alpha 3-factor 0.628Alpha 6-factor 0.889Alpha 8-factor 0.812Alpha west observed loan returns, (ii) the Long portfolio contains the quintile of stocks with the highest observed loan returns, (iii) the Long Short (2.40) (2.12) (1.70) (3.09) (2.86) ortfolio, which captures the difference in returns of the Long and Short portfolios, and (iv)-(vi) portfolios 2-4, which contain the second throug Long 1 (Short) - Short -0.482 2.115 2.253-1.224 2.155-1.253 2.148-1.061 2.101-1.079 urth quintiles, respectively, of stocks sorted on observed loan returns. We report the raw returns for each of the portfolios. We also report CAPM (-0.60) lphas, as well as 3, 6, and 8-factor alphas for each (4.63) of the portfolios. (4.83) (-3.07) The 3-factor (4.77) (-3.25) model includes (4.89) (-2.92) the excess market (4.52) (-3.09) return (RMRF), the valu ctor (HML), and 2 the size factor (SMB). The 6-factor 0.391 model adds -0.189 the momentum factor -0.309 (UMD) as well -0.316 as the short- and -0.279 long-term reversal factor TR and LTR). NFinally, months the 8-factor model further (0.71) 204includes the(-0.68) liquidity 204 (LIQ) and (-1.09) 204 betting against(-1.09) 204 beta (BAB) factors. (-0.91) 204The t-statistics reporte parentheses below 3 the coefficient estimates are0.772 computed using0.197 Newey and West 0.114 (1987) adjusted standard 0.187 errors. 0.140 (1.50) (0.62) (0.36) (0.54) (0.39) 4 0.383-0.185-0.284-0.317-0.403 (0.61) (-0.58) (-0.87) (-0.95) (-1.23) Value-weighted 5 (Long) strategy Raw0.874 Return CAPM 0.341 Alpha 3-factor 0.212 Alpha 6-factor 0.338 Alpha 8-factor 0.289 Alpha (1.50) (1.01) (0.62) (1.05) (0.84) 1 Long (Short) - Short -0.482 1.356-1.224 1.565-1.253 1.465-1.061 1.400-1.079 1.369 (-0.60) (2.78) (-3.07) (3.31) (-3.25) (3.23) (-2.92) (3.26) (-3.09) (3.09) 2 0.391-0.189-0.309-0.316-0.279 N months (0.71) 204 (-0.68) 204 (-1.09) 204 (-1.09) 204 (-0.91) 204 3 0.772 0.197 0.114 0.187 0.140 (1.50) (0.62) (0.36) (0.54) (0.39) 4 0.383-0.185-0.284-0.317-0.403 Syndicated Loans and Stock Returns (0.61) (-0.58) CFIC 2018 (-0.87) (-0.95) (-1.23) 8 / 18

Main Results Performance Evaluation Performance: Time Series 1998m1 1999m1 2000m1 2001m1 2002m1 2003m1 2004m1 2005m1 2006m1 2007m1 2008m1 2009m1 2010m1 2011m1 2012m1 2013m1 2014m1 2015m1 EW Long Short CAR (%) 0 100 200 300 400 500 Syndicated Loans and Stock Returns CFIC 2018 9 / 18

the time series average of cross-sectional R s. The t-statistics reported in parentheses below Main Results Performance Evaluation the coefficient estimates are computed using Newey and West (1987) adjusted standard errors using a six-month lag. Performance: Fama-MacBeth Predictive Regressions Excess Stock Return (t+1) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) Synd Loan Return (t) 0.468 0.444 0.407 0.494 0.414 0.667 (2.84) (2.46) (2.14) (2.61) (2.27) (3.14) Size -0.245-0.265-0.225-0.245-0.203 (-1.75) (-1.80) (-1.73) (-1.72) (-1.25) Book-to-market -0.505-0.481-0.437-0.543-0.452 (-1.46) (-1.38) (-1.31) (-1.59) (-1.17) Lagged 6mRet 0.281 0.183 0.164 0.311 0.128 (0.32) (0.19) (0.19) (0.38) (0.14) Stock Return (t) -0.007-0.013 (-0.54) (-1.06) Market Leverage -0.201-0.218 (-1.46) (-1.61) SUE 0.058 0.040 (2.46) (1.65) Synd Loan Return Size -0.254 (-1.86) Constant 0.879 4.097 4.326 3.984 4.136 3.740 (1.72) (1.98) (1.99) (2.14) (1.99) (1.53) Avg R-squared 0.028 0.108 0.133 0.141 0.130 0.200 N obs 18,335 18,335 18,335 17,883 18,335 17,883 N months 204 204 204 204 204 204 Syndicated Loans and Stock Returns CFIC 2018 10 / 18

Avg R-squared 0.151 0.142 0.153 0.138 0.268 Syndicated Loans and Stock N Returns obs CFIC18,329 2018 18,335 17,986 18,335 17,980 11 / 18 at the end of month t. Illiquidity is calculated as the average ratio of daily absolute return to dollar trading volume in the prior Main year Results (Amihud, Performance 2002). We report Evaluation the time series average of cross-sectional R 2 s. The t-statistics reported in parentheses below the coefficient estimates are computed using Newey and West (1987) adjusted standard errors using a six-month lag. Performance: Arbitrage Constraints Excess Stock Return (t+1) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Synd Loan Return (t) 0.377 0.630 0.465 0.783 0.635 (2.03) (2.78) (2.09) (3.03) (2.42) Size -0.286-0.256-0.281-0.342-0.261 (-1.90) (-1.83) (-2.14) (-2.43) (-1.64) Book-to-market -0.440-0.500-0.819-0.633-0.824 (-1.25) (-1.41) (-2.09) (-1.72) (-2.00) Lagged 6mRet 0.537 0.248 0.125 0.246 0.357 (0.62) (0.30) (0.16) (0.28) (0.47) IVOL -0.271-0.209 (-2.22) (-1.42) Log(IO) -1.210-0.945 (-1.04) (-0.71) Bid-Ask Spread -0.306-0.308 (-0.34) (-0.28) Illiquidity -0.146-0.315 (-0.86) (-1.76) Synd Loan Return IVOL -0.047-0.197 (-0.29) (-0.95) Synd Loan Return Log(IO) -0.733-4.063 (-0.73) (-1.52) Synd Loan Return Bid-Ask Spread 0.333 2.271 (0.32) (1.28) Synd Loan Return Illiquidity 0.152-0.244 (0.57) (-0.59) Synd Loan Return Size -0.096 (-0.49) Constant 5.206 5.090 4.859 5.576 5.675 (2.36) (2.37) (2.67) (2.80) (2.24)

Economic Mechanism Potential Channels Potential Channels Investor Inattention Perhaps equity investors are just unaware of the LSTA data Or events in the syndicated loan market are not salient If information in the syndicated loan market is made salient, then the predictability should disappear (e.g., if loan returns printed in the WSJ) Cross-Market Information Processing Constraints Even if the syndicated loan market information is presented on a platter, specialized equity investors may not know what to do with it Equity vs. debt market specializations may prevent equity investors from taking advantage Syndicated Loans and Stock Returns CFIC 2018 12 / 18

Economic Mechanism Potential Channels: Investor Inattention Wall Street Journal Aug 2000 - Aug 2015: WSJ printed a weekly table of 25 Biggest Movers Syndicated Loans and Stock Returns CFIC 2018 13 / 18

Sample. This table reports performance estimates of the Long Short portfolio formed using only names reported in the Wall Street Journ Economic Mechanism Potential Channels: Investor Inattention est Movers column. In Panel A, the portfolio returns are value-weighted. In Panel B, the portfolio returns are equal-weighted. We rep w returns for each of the portfolios. We also report CAPM alphas, as well as 3, 6, and 8-factor alphas for each of the portfolios. The 3-fac l includes the excess market return (RMRF), the value factor (HML), and the size factor (SMB). The 6-factor model adds the moment (UMD) Wall as well Street as the short- Journal: and long-term reversal Portfolio factors (STR and Returns LTR). Finally, the 8-factor model further includes the liquidity (L etting against beta (BAB) factors. The t-statistics reported in parentheses below the coefficient estimates are computed using Newey a (1987) adjusted standard errors. VW Long-Short Portfolio Returns Raw Return CAPM Alpha 3-factor Alpha 6-factor Alpha 8-factor Alpha WSJ List 2.334 2.404 2.249 2.384 2.088 (3.00) (3.04) (2.84) (3.41) (2.85) Non-WSJ List 1.315 1.451 1.226 1.222 1.107 (2.44) (2.76) (2.73) (2.67) (2.45) EW Long-Short Portfolio Returns Raw Return CAPM Alpha 3-factor Alpha 6-factor Alpha 8-factor Alpha WSJ List 2.458 2.564 2.349 2.514 2.092 (3.16) (3.32) (3.45) (4.30) (3.28) Non-WSJ List 1.767 1.904 1.643 1.710 1.556 (3.70) (4.18) (4.61) (4.60) (4.22) Syndicated Loans and Stock Returns CFIC 2018 14 / 18

Economic Mechanism Potential Channels: Integrated Funds Potential Channels Investor Inattention Perhaps equity investors are just unaware of the LSTA data Or events in the syndicated loan market are not salient If information in the syndicated loan market is made salient, then the predictability should disappear (e.g., if loan returns printed in the WSJ) Cross-Market Information Processing Constraints Even if the syndicated loan market information is presented on a platter, specialized equity investors may not know what to do with it Equity vs. debt market specializations may prevent equity investors from taking advantage Syndicated Loans and Stock Returns CFIC 2018 15 / 18

Economic Mechanism Potential Channels: Integrated Funds Stocks held by Integrated Funds Integrated Funds Search post-2010 mutual fund holdings data for hybrid funds that own both equities and syndicated loans Flag stocks held by integrated funds in month prior to portfolio formation Prediction: if loan market information is used by investors with cross-market expertise, then expect lower predictability among stocks held by integrated funds Caveat: Flagged equities may be observably (and unobservably) different (e.g., size) Syndicated Loans and Stock Returns CFIC 2018 16 / 18

integrated mutual fund indicator equal to one if an integrated fund owned the corresponding Economic Mechanism Potential Channels: Integrated Funds stock in the prior month, and zero otherwise. Integrated funds are defined as funds holding both stocks and syndicated funds. We report the time series average of cross-sectional R 2 s. The t-statistics reported in parentheses below the coefficient estimates are computed using Newey and West (1987) adjusted standard errors using a six-month lag. Integrated Funds: Active in both markets Excess Stock Return (t+1) (1) (2) (3) Synd Loan Return (t) 1.738 1.417 2.235 (3.11) (2.64) (2.66) Synd Loan Return Integrated Fund -1.840-1.436-2.461 (-3.11) (-2.40) (-2.58) Integrated Fund 0.193 0.158 0.690 (0.40) (0.29) (1.26) Size 0.055 0.081 (0.29) (0.33) Book-to-market -0.857-0.598 (-2.32) (-1.86) Lagged 6mRet 0.368 0.336 (0.37) (0.41) IVOL -0.250 (-1.17) Log(IO) -0.145 (-0.20) Bid-Ask Spread 1.027 (0.39) Illiquidity -0.161 (-0.43) Synd Loan Return Size 0.784 (2.74) Synd Loan Return IVOL -0.087 (-0.23) Synd Loan Return Log(IO) -0.950 (-0.68) Synd Loan Return Bid-Ask Spread 3.832 (0.68) Synd Loan Return Illiquidity 0.109 (0.12) Constant 1.182 0.730 0.067 (1.69) (0.24) (0.02) Avg R-squared 0.061 0.132 0.267 N obs 5,633 5,633 5,631 N months 60 60 60 37 Syndicated Loans and Stock Returns CFIC 2018 17 / 18

Conclusion Conclusion 1. Demonstrate that stock returns can be predicted using private information revealed in syndicated loan market quotes 2. Show that attention is not enough to integrate these markets - pricing lag persists even when loan returns are publicly reported in the WSJ 3. Provide evidence that integrated investors (i.e., those with ability to interpret information in both markets) eliminate the predictable pattern Syndicated Loans and Stock Returns CFIC 2018 18 / 18